Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;158(6):2546–2555. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.053

Table 3.

Risk Assessment Comparison Between Cardiac Index and Other ESC/ERS Risk Variables

Variable ESC/ERS Risk Category4
P Value (χ2)
Low
Intermediate
High
TDCI ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2 (n = 63) TDCI 2-2.4 L/min/m2 (n = 45) TDCI < 2 L/min/m2 (n = 50) P Value (χ2)
WHO functional class .01
 I/II 28 (44)a 14 (31) 9 (18)
 III 31 (49) 23 (51)a 29 (58)
 IV 4 (6) 8 (18) 12 (24)a
6MWD, m (n = 153) .06
 > 440 10 (17)a 6 (14) 1 (2)
 165-440 44 (73) 28 (64)a 40 (82)
 < 165 6 (10) 10 (23) 8 (16)a
NT-pro BNP, pg/mL (n = 136) .04
 < 300 24 (43)a 13 (35) 6 (14)
 300-1,400 15 (27) 13 (35)a 18 (42)
 > 1,400 17 (30) 11 (30) 19 (44)a
RAP, mm Hg .03
 < 8 33 (53)a 17 (38) 14 (28)
 8-14 23 (37) 18 (40)a 21 (42)
 > 14 6 (10) 10 (22) 15 (30)a
Pericardial effusion 8 (13) 6 (14) 10 (21)a .51

Values are No. (%) or as otherwise indicated. ESC/ERS = European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society; TDCI = thermodilution cardiac index. See Table 1 legend for expansion of other abbreviations.

a

Risk category that are concordant between the cardiac index and the comparator risk variable.