Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0230401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230401

Podocyte-specific knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) results in differential protection depending on the model of glomerulonephritis

James F Dylewski 1,2,*, Pantipa Tonsawan 3, Gabriela Garcia 1, Linda Lewis 1, Judith Blaine 1
Editor: Zhanjun Jia4
PMCID: PMC7769425  PMID: 33370294

Abstract

Podocytes have been proposed to be antigen presenting cells (APCs). In traditional APCs, the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is required for antigen presentation and global knockout of FcRn protects against glomerulonephritis. Since podocytes express FcRn, we sought to determine whether the absence of podocyte FcRn ameliorates immune-mediated disease. We examined MHCII and costimulatory markers expression in cultured wild type (WT) and FcRn knockout (KO) podocytes. Interferon gamma (IFNγ) induced MHCII expression in both WT and KO podocytes but did not change CD80 expression. Neither WT nor KO expressed CD86 or inducible costimulatory ligand (ICOSL) at baseline or with IFNγ. Using an antigen presentation assay, WT podocytes but not KO treated with immune complexes induced a modest increase in IL-2. Induction of the anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) model resulted in a significant decrease in glomerular crescents in podocyte-specific FcRn knockout mouse (podFcRn KO) versus controls but the overall percentage of crescents was low. To examine the effects of the podocyte-specific FcRn knockout in a model with a longer autologous phase, we used the nephrotoxic serum nephritis (NTS) model. We found that the podFcRn KO mice had significantly reduced crescent formation and glomerulosclerosis compared to control mice. This study demonstrates that lack of podocyte FcRn is protective in immune mediated kidney disease that is dependent on an autologous phase. This study also highlights the difference between the anti-GBM model and NTS model of disease.

Introduction

Despite glomerulonephritis being the third leading cause of end stage kidney disease in the United States [1], treatment options are limited and typically involve systemic immunosuppressive medications which are variably effective and have multiple side effects. Treatment of these diseases is limited, in part, by the incomplete understanding of how the immune system recognizes and targets the kidneys.

Prior studies have demonstrated that glomerulonephritis are dependent on CD4+ T cell and the adaptive immune system [24]. Stimulation of the CD4+ T cells have been shown to be carried out by intrinsic renal cells that express major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) [5]. Goldwich et al published data showing that podocytes express MHCII and suggesting that podocytes act as non-hematopoietic professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) that can stimulate CD4+ T cells [6]. Podocytes are able to express CD80, which is a well-known costimulatory marker needed for activation of T cells, and CD80 expression has been associated with certain glomerular diseases [7, 8]. Given these findings, podocytes have been proposed as candidates for the intrinsic renal cells that trigger an immune response and lead to glomerulonephritis. However, a better understanding of the mechanism by which podocytes can cause an immune response is needed to provide targeted therapies for these devastating disorders.

A promising area of study is the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). FcRn is a major histocompatibility class I-like protein that was initially described and discovered as a means for infant enterocytes to obtain passive immunity through breast milk [9, 10]. Since its initial description, FcRn has been found to play important roles in albumin and IgG recycling and has been shown to be expressed in several other cell types [9, 1118]. In the kidneys, FcRn is expressed in endothelial cells, podocytes and proximal tubular cells [1315, 17, 19].

FcRn also plays an important role in adaptive immunity [12, 2024]. Studies in dendritic cells have established that FcRn is necessary for trafficking antigen-antibody complexes for degradation as well as presentation on MHCII [10, 20, 25, 26]. Furthermore, studies have shown that when FcRn is absent, dendritic cells cannot present antigen for antigen presentation [25]. Interestingly, when FcRn is globally knocked out of mice, glomerulonephritis is attenuated [27]. However, it remains unclear whether lack of FcRn in dendritic cells, endothelial cells, or podocytes provides this protective effect. Knowledge of precisely in which cells FcRn is required for induction of glomerulonephritis would allow for the development of targeted therapies.

In this study, we investigated whether podocytes can function as APCs and whether knockout of FcRn specifically in podocytes attenuates the progression of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) nephritis and nephrotoxic serum nephritis (NTS). We chose these models as both are well-characterized models of immune mediated kidney disease. In addition, using the anti-GBM model, Goldwich et al. had previously found that podocyte-specific knockout of MHCII attenuated renal disease but whether this can be observed in other disease models and the exact mechanism is unknown [28]. Since in dendritic cells, FcRn is required for antigen presentation via MHCII, we hypothesized podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn would ameliorate antibody-mediated immune kidney disease.

The anti-GBM model is characterized by a heterologous phase which lasts 4–5 days post anti-GBM antibody injection and is characterized by neutrophil invasion and complement deposition [29, 30]. The initial heterologous phase is followed by an autologous phase in which T helper cells enter the kidney in response to autologous antibodies produced to the anti-GBM antibody. In the anti-GBM model, the autologous antibody phase only lasts 4–6 days as the anti-GBM model is a severe model of disease with mice not surviving beyond 10 days [31, 32]. We examined the effects of podocyte-specific FcRn KO at both day 3 and day 8 after induction of anti-GBM nephritis to determine whether lack of FcRn had an effect on either phase of the disease.

The NTS model has relatively mild heterologous phase and is more dependent on autologous antibody production [33, 34]. Since this model is more dependent on the humoral immune system and takes longer to develop, we examined the effects of the podocyte-specific FcRn KO at 28 days after induction to ensure adequate time for humoral response.

Methods

Cell culture

Generation of conditionally immortalized WT and FcRn KO podocytes

Podocytes were isolated from WT or global FcRn KO mice and then underwent immortalization using a thermosensitive polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen as previously described [3537]. Primary podocytes were allowed to replicate at 33°C. To induce differentiation, podocytes were placed at 37°C for 8–10 days. To verify expression of podocyte markers, podocytes were stained with podocin or WT1 and synaptopodin expression was checked by Western blot. Conditionally immortalized WT or KO podocytes were allowed to differentiate at 37°C for 9–10 days prior to being used in experiments.

Flow cytometry

Multiparameter flow cytometry (FACS) was performed using a Beckman Coulter Gallios 561 compensated with single fluorochromes and analyzed using Kaluza™ software (Beckman Coulter). Differentiated transformed mouse WT and FcRn KO podocytes populations were identified by their characteristic forward scatter/side scatter (fsc:ssc) properties. Monoclonal anti-mouse antibodies anti-CD80-FITC (clone 16-10A1), anti-MHCII-APC (clone MS/114.15.2), anti-CD86-PE-Cy5 (clone GL1) were purchased from eBiosciences and anti-PE-ICOSL (clone 9F.8A4) was purchased from BioLegend. The Live/Dead Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen) was used to assess the number of live cells. Cells were detached, washed and stained for surface antigen expression at 4°C in the dark for 60 minutes and then washed again prior to flow cytometry. Unstained cells and fluorescence minus one (FMO) samples were used as controls.

Antigen presentation assay

1 x 103 WT or FcRn KO podocytes per well were plated in a collagen coated 96 well plate and allowed to differentiate. After differentiation, podocytes were treated for 24 hours with IFNγ (100 units/ml) media. Subsequently, podocytes were treated for 6 hours with media alone, an 4-Hydoxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-ovalbumin (NP-ovalbumin) specific mouse IgG2c antibody (kindly provided by Raul Torres, PhD, University of Colorado Denver) alone at a concentration of 20 μg/ml or immune complexes made by incubating mouse IgG2a antibody (20 μg/ml) with NP-ovalbumin (40 μg/ml). After treatment, podocytes were rinsed well. The NP-ovalbumin specific CD4+ hybridoma cell line BO80.1 (kindly provided by Philippa Marrack, PhD, National Jewish) was added to each well at a density of 1 X 104 for 24 hrs. The plate was then spun down and supernatants transferred to a clean 96 well plate and frozen to remove any residual T cells. IL-2 concentration in the supernatant was measured by ELISA. Each experimental condition was repeated in triplicate and an n of at least 4 experiments was performed.

Animals

podFcRn KO mice were obtained by crossing C57BL/6J FcRn floxed mice [38] (a kind gift from Dr. Sally Ward, UT Southwestern) with C57BL/6J podocin-Cre mice (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, Maine) as previously described [36]. Genotype was determined by PCR. All experimental mice were homozygous for the floxed (fl) FcRn gene. podFcRn KO mice (FcRn fl/fl;Pod-cre/+) were double transgenic resulting in no FcRn expression in podocytes. Control mice (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) were single transgenic (no Cre expression) resulting in unchanged FcRn expression in podocytes. Male mice were used for all experiments. Euthanasia was achieved by euthanasia solution overdose. All procedures involving animals were performed using protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Colorado, Denver. All experiments were performed in accordance with regulations and policies as laid out by PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as well as the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Colorado, Denver.

For the anti-GBM experiments mortality was as follows: one control and two podocyte-specific FcRn Ko mice died during the experiment. Starting numbers were 11 control and 12 podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice.

For the NTS experiments, one control and one podocyte-specific FcRn KO mouse died during the experiment so starting numbers were as follows: 9 control and 8 podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice

Anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis model

The anti-GBM nephritis model was induced as previously described [2931]. Briefly, 8–12-week-old podFcRn KO or control mice were primed with 1 mg/mouse of normal rabbit IgG in Freund's complete adjuvant, followed 5 days later by an intravenous injection of 0.2 mg/g of rabbit anti-mouse GBM antibody provided by Dr. Gabriela Garcia. Mice were sacrificed at 8 days after GBM antibody injection. Prior to sacrifice urine and blood were collected. Urine albumin was measured using the Albuwell assay (Exocell), urine creatinine was measured using the assay and BUN was measured on an Alpha Wasserman auto analyzer. Titers of rabbit IgG in control and podFcRn KO mice were measured as previously described [39]. Briefly, a 96 well plate was coated with 10 ug/ml rabbit IgG. Coated wells were incubated with serum from control or podFcRn KO mice diluted 1:10,000. Mouse anti-rabbit total IgG titers were measured by ELISA (Biolegend).

Nephrotoxic serum nephritis model

The nephrotoxic serum nephritis model is a newer but increasingly utilized model of glomerulonephritis in mice [33, 4045]. Briefly, 8–12 week old podFcRn KO or control mice were given an intravenous injection of 100μL of sheep anti-Rat glomerular basement membrane antibody made by Probetex Inc. (San Antonio, TX) at day 0. Mice were sacrificed on day 28 after injection. Prior to sacrifice, urine and blood were collected. Urine albumin, urine creatinine, and serum BUN were measured using the same methods as described above under the anti-GBM nephritis model.

Histology

Three micrometer (μm) sections were cut from paraffin embedded tissue and stained using the periodic acid Schiff reagent. All histologic analysis was performed in a blinded fashion. Crescent formation, defined as the presence of two or more layers of cells in Bowman’s space, was evaluated in 20–30 random glomeruli for each mouse. Glomerulosclerosis was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system. The glomerular score was determined from a mean of at least 20–30 glomeruli sampled at random. The severity of glomerulosclerosis was graded on a scale (0 to 4) as follows: grade 0, normal glomerulus; grade 1,mild hyalinosis/sclerosis involving < 25% of the glomerulus; grade 2, moderate segmental hyalinosis/sclerosis involving < 50% of the glomerulus; grade 3, diffuse glomerular hyalinosis/sclerosis involving more than 50% of the glomerulus; grade 4, diffuse glomerulosclerosis with total glomerular obliteration. Histologic analysis was performed using Aperioscope.

Immunofluorescence

Confocal microscopy images were acquired using Zeiss 780 laser-scanning confocal/multiphoton-excitation fluorescence microscope with a 34-Channel GaAsP QUASAR Detection Unit and non-descanned detectors for two-photon fluorescence (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). The imaging settings were initially defined empirically to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio and to avoid saturation. In comparative imaging, the settings were kept constant between samples. Images were captured with a Zeiss C-Apochromat 40x/1.2NA Korr FCS M27 water-immersion lens objective. The illumination for imaging was provided by a 30mW Argon Laser using excitation at 488 nm, Helium Neon (HeNe) 5mW (633 nm) and 1mW (543 nm). Image processing was performed using Zeiss ZEN 2012 software. Images were analyzed in Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, Maryland).

For the in vivo immunolocalization studies, the kidneys were cleared of blood by perfusion of PBS and then with 4% PFA in PBS (pH 7.4). The kidneys were then removed, immersed in 4% PFA for 24hr, infused with 5% (2 hr), 10% (2 hr) and 25% (overnight) sucrose, frozen in liquid nitrogen and cryosectioned (3 μm). Kidney sections were blocked (10% normal goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS) and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody ((Ly6G, 1:10; BD/Pharmingen), FITC-C3 (1:200; MP Biomedical), CD68 (1:200; Bio-Rad), CD4 (1:50; Biolegend). After washing, the sections were incubated (60 min, room temperature) with appropriate mix of Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgG (1:500; Invitrogen), Hoechst 33342 (1:1000; ThermoFisher) and Alexa 633-conjugated phalloidin (1:250; Invitrogen). Sections were then washed with PBS and mounted in VectaShield (Vector Labs). Fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ. Number of macrophages or CD4+ T cells were determined by counting nuclei, identified by Hoechst, that were also positive for CD68 or CD4 staining.

Data analysis

Data are presented as means ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests for two groups and one-way analysis of variance for 3 or more groups, using Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Tukey's post hoc test was applied to the ANOVA data. Values were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

MHCII and costimulatory marker expression in WT and FcRn KO podocytes

Podocytes were isolated from wild type (WT) and global FcRn KO (KO) mice and immortalized using the thermosensitive polyomavirus simian virus (SV40) T antigen as described previously [36, 37]. Murine podocytes are not known to express MHCII at baseline. However, it is well established that cells, including podocytes, can express MHCII after exposure to INFγ [6, 4652]. In order to determine if the absence of FcRn alters podocytes ability to express MHCII or costimulatory markers which, in turn, could affect antigen presentation, WT and KO podocytes underwent flow cytometry for MHCII, cluster of differentiation 80 (CD80), cluster of differentiation 86 (CD86) or inducible costimulatory ligand (ICOSL) expression at baseline and after treatment of IFNγ.

Both WT and KO podocytes had minimal MHCII expression at baseline. After treatment with IFNγ, both WT and KO had a significant increase in MHCII expression compared to untreated cells. (26.5% +/- 7.6% for WT + IFNγ vs. 23.9% +/- 2.6% for KO + IFNγ, Fig 1).

Fig 1. MCH II and co-stimulatory marker expression in cell lines in WT and FcRn KO podocytes.

Fig 1

Flow cytometry data showing MHC II, CD80, CD86 and ICOSL expression in WT and FcRn KO podocytes at baseline and after treatment with IFNγ. Treatment with IFNγ results in increased MHCII expression in WT and KO podocytes (a, p = 0.0036). Both WT and FcRn KO podocytes express CD80 at baseline and this is not significantly increased after treatment with IFNγ. WT and FcRn KO podocytes do not express CD86 or ICOSL at baseline or after treatment with IFNγ (n = 3 to 4 experiments for all conditions).

Both WT and KO podocytes expressed cluster of differentiation 80 (CD80) at baseline (25.8 +/- 2.1% for WT versus 26.8 +/- 3.2% for KO) and expression was not significantly changed with IFNγ treatment (Fig 1B). Both WT and KO podocytes did not express cluster of differentiation 86 (CD86) or inducible costimulatory ligand (ICOSL) at baseline or after treatment with IFNγ (Fig 1).

WT podocytes were weak antigen presenting cells in vitro whereas KO podocytes did not present antigen at all

In addition to T cells binding to the APC’s MHCII and costimulatory markers, CD4+ T cells need autocrine cytokine production (such as interleukin 2 (IL2)) to act as a third signal for T cell activation. To determine whether podocytes can act as APCs, an in vitro antigen presentation assay was performed using WT and KO podocytes. CD4+ T cell activation was measured by determining the amount of IL2 produced by the T cells when WT or KO podocytes were used as APCs. WT podocytes treated with media alone and immunoglobulin G (IgG) alone induced minimal IL2 production when co-cultured with CD4+ T cells. When WT podocytes were treated with IgG + ovalbumin (immune complexes, ICs) there was a significant increase in IL2 production by CD4+ T cells (6.8 +/- 0.9 pg/ml versus 3.3 +/- 0.7 pg/ml for WT + IC vs. WT + media, p < 0.05, Fig 2). T cell production of IL2, however, was significantly less when WT podocytes were used as APCs compared to splenocytes (S1 Fig), suggesting that podocytes are inefficient APCs. KO podocytes treated with media or IgG alone also induced minimal IL2 production by CD4+ T cells. In contrast to WT podocytes, when FcRn KO podocytes were used as APCs, there was no significant increase in IL2 production by CD4+ T cells (Fig 2), suggesting that KO podocytes are unable to present antigen.

Fig 2. Antigen presentation in WT and FcRn KO podocytes.

Fig 2

Treatment of podocytes with immune complexes (IgG + NP-Ova) resulted in a significant increase in T cell IL2 production in WT but not FcRn KO podocytes. a, p < 0.05 compared to WT + media alone; b, p = 0.0016 compared to WT + immune complexes.

Podocyte-specific KO of FcRn did not alter neutrophil invasion or complement component 3 (C3) deposition after induction of anti-GBM nephritis

In order to determine whether podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn would protect against induction of glomerulonephritis, we generated podocyte-specific FcRn KO (podFcRn KO) mice by crossing podocin-Cre mice with FcRn floxed mice to create FcRn fl/fl:Podocin-Cre/+ mice (Fig 3) as previously described [37]. FcRn floxed mice lacking the Cre transgene (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) served as littermate controls. Podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn did not alter renal histology at 3 months of age (for the anti-GBM model mice were used between 8 and 12 weeks of age; Fig 3A). Since FcRn is known to play an important role in IgG recycling, rabbit IgG titers were checked in podFcRn KO mice and controls 3 days after injection of rabbit anti-mouse anti-GBM antibodies to ensure that antibody levels were similar. There was no difference in anti-rabbit IgG titers in controls versus podFcRn KO, indicating that knockout of FcRn in podocytes does not significantly alter IgG metabolism (Fig 3B).

Fig 3. Characterization of podocyte-specific FcRn knockout mice and induction of anti-GBM nephritis.

Fig 3

A. Left Panels: Representative images of glomeruli from 3 month old control (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) and podocyte-specific FcRn KO (FcRn fl/fl;Pod-Cre/+). Scale bar 10 μm. Right Panel: minimal glomerulosclerosis at 3 months (n = 3 control and n = 3 KO mice) and no crescents were observed. B, Anti-rabbit IgG titers obtained from control and podFcRn KO mice demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups 3 days after the injection of the rabbit anti-mouse GBM antibody. C, Left panels: Representative immunofluorescent staining images of podFcRn KO and control mice for C3 (green) and actin (red) 3 days after injections of anti-mouse GBM antibody. Scale bar 20 μm. There was no difference in C3 staining intensity between control and podFcRn KO (right panel; n = 6 control and n = 7 podocyte specific KO mice). D, Left panels: Representative images of immunofluorescent staining for Ly6 (green) for neutrophil quantification. Actin is blue. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: there was no significant difference in the number of neutrophils per glomerular cross section between the podFcRn KO and controls (numbers of mice same as in E).

Neutrophil invasion and complement component 3 (C3) deposition occurs in the heterologous phase of the anti-GBM model (within 1–4 days of anti-GBM injection) [30]. To determine if podocyte-specific KO of FcRn had any effect on the early inflammatory response, glomerular neutrophil invasion and C3 deposition were assessed in control and podFcRn KO mice. There was no significant difference in C3 deposition (Fig 3C) or the number of neutrophils per glomerular cross section (Fig 3D) in control or podFcRn KO mice 3 days after injection of anti-GBM antibody, indicating that podocyte-specific KO of FcRn does not attenuate the early inflammatory response.

Podocyte specific FcRn knockout protects against crescents formation at 8 days after anti-GBM induction

To examine the effects of podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn on the autologous phase of anti-GBM nephritis, markers of renal function and disease severity were examined in podFcRn KO and control mice 8 days after injection of anti-GBM antibodies. At day 8 after induction of anti-GBM nephritis, there was no significant difference in albuminuria, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glomerulosclerosis scores, glomerular C3 staining, CD4+ T cell or macrophage infiltration, in control versus podFcRn KO (Fig 4A–4F, n = 10 control and n = 10 PodFcRn KO mice). However, PodFcRn KO mice showed a significant decrease in the percentage of glomerular crescents at day 8 compared to control mice (8.5 +/- 2.0% crescents in control vs. 3.4 +/- 1.1% crescents in KO, p = 0.04, Fig 4G). Of note, although the anti-GBM model resulted in significant albuminuria in both control and podFcRn KO mice, the percentage of crescents seen in the control mice was relatively low. These findings are in accord with some other studies of this model in mice [5356], making this model less ideal to study glomerulonephritis.

Fig 4. Podocyte specific KO of FcRn results in a significant decrease in glomerular crescents 8 days after anti-GBM disease induction.

Fig 4

A, Urine albumin to creatinine ratios in control and podFcRn KO mice (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRnKO mice per group). B, BUN in control and podFcRn KO mice. (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRnKO mice per group). C, Left panel: representative images of histology in control and podFcRn KO and control mice at day 8. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Glomerulosclerosis score in control and podFcRn KO mice (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRnKO mice per group). D, Left panel: representative images of C3 staining (green) in control and podFcRn KO mice 8 days after anti-GBM disease induction. Actin is stained blue. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Quantification of C3 intensity normalized for glomerular area in control and podFcRn KO mice (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRn KO mice). E, Left panel: representative images of staining for macrophages (green) in control and podFcRn KO mice 8 days after anti-GBM disease induction. Actin is stained red and nuclei are stained blue. Scale bare 20 μm. Right panel: Quantification of number of macrophages per glomerulus in control and podFcRn Ko mice (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRn KO mice). F, Left panel: representative images of glomerular staining for CD4+ T cells (green) in control and podFcRn KO mice at day 8 after anti-GBM induction. Actin is stained red. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Quantification of CD4+ cells per glomerulus in control and podFcRn KO mice (n = 10 control and n = 10 podFcRnKO mice per group). G, Left panels: representative images of crescents in control mice. Middle Panels: representative images of crescents podFcRn KO mice shown at low and high power. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Percentage of crescents in control and podFcRn KO mice (numbers of mice are same as in C). Podocyte-specific KO of FcRn results in a significant decrease in the number of crescents (a, p = 0.035).

Podocyte specific FcRn knockout protects against crescent formation and glomerulosclerosis at 28 days after NTS induction

To examine the effects of podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn in a disease with a disease with a prolonged autologous phase, we measured markers of renal function and disease severity 28 days after the induction of nephrotoxic serum nephritis (NTS). At 28 days after induction of NTS, there was a significant reduction in albuminuria in the podoFcRn KO mice compared to control (872.9 +/- 65.40 in controls (n = 8) vs 668.7 +/- 66.45 in podFcRn KO mice (n = 7), p = 0.048, Fig 5A) but not blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (75.13 +/- 5.96 in controls (n = 8) vs 67.18+/-6.50 in podoFcRn (n = 6), p = 0.3897, Fig 5B). PodFcRn KO also had significantly lower glomerulosclerosis scores (1.94 +/- 0.24 in controls vs 1.10 +/- 0.24 in KO, p = 0.03, Fig 5C) and percentage of glomerular crescents (31.98 +/- 5.26% in controls vs 6.34 +/- 1.18% in KO, p = 0.0007, Fig 5D) compared to controls.

Fig 5. Podocyte specific KO of FcRn results in a significant decrease in albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and glomerular crescents after nephrotoxic serum nephritis induction.

Fig 5

A, Urine albumin to creatinine ratios in control were significantly higher than podFcRn KO mice (n = 8 control and n = 7 podFcRnKO mice), p = 0.0480. B, BUN in control and podFcRn KO mice were similar (n = 8 control and n = 6 podFcRnKO mice), p = 0.3897. C, Left panel: representative images of histology in control mice at day 28. Middle panel: representative image of histology in podFcRn KO at day 28. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Glomerulosclerosis score in control and podFcRn KO mice (n = 8 control and n = 7 podFcRnKO mice per group). Podcyte-specific KO of FcRn results in significant decrease in glomerulosclerosis score compared to control mice (p = 0.03). D, Left panel: representative images of crescents in control mice. Middle Panel: representative images of crescents podFcRn KO mice shown. Scale bar 20 μm. Right panel: Percentage of crescents in control and podFcRn KO mice (numbers of mice are same as in C). Podocyte-specific KO of FcRn results in a significant decrease in the number of crescents (p = 0.0007).

Discussion

Glomerulonephritis have long provided therapeutic challenges and efforts are ongoing to understand the mechanisms involved in these diseases. Within the kidney, podocytes have been proposed to act as APCs since they express some of the molecular machinery required for antigen presentation (MHCII, CD80, FcRn) and podocyte-specific KO of MHC II has been shown to attenuate anti-GBM disease [6]. Here we show that in vitro, WT podocytes have the ability to express MHCII and CD80, which are necessary for T cell stimulation, but that WT podocytes have limited ability to activate T cells in vitro. Though inefficient, antigen presentation by podocytes is dependent on FcRn since the KO podocytes were not able to stimulate T cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the inability of the KO podocytes to present antigen was not due to abnormal MHCII or costimulatory marker expression since both WT and KO podocytes had similar levels (Fig 1).

Our in vivo data demonstrated that the absence of FcRn in podocytes did not protect against anti-GBM nephritis in the early heterologous stage of the disease. In the autologous phase, podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn resulted in a significant decrease in crescent formation without a significant change in albuminuria, BUN or glomerulosclersosis score. One possibility is that podocyte FcRn is not required for induction of anti-GBM nephritis but may play a role in the resolution phase of the disease. Alternatively, the damage caused by the heterologous phase of the anti-GBM nephritis model may have been too extreme and irreversibly impacted the albuminuria, BUN, and glomerulosclerosis scores despite a protective effect during the autologous phase provided by knocking out FcRn.

By utilizing the NTS model, we were able to demonstrate that podocyte FcRn plays a significant role in glomerulonephritis diseases that are more autologous in nature. Since there was significantly less albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and crescents in the podocyte-specific FcRn knockout mice using the NTS model suggests that the albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis observed in our anti-GBM nephritis model was driven mostly by the heterologous phase. Our nephrotoxic serum nephritis findings also suggest that podocyte FcRn is mainly involved in autologous phase and not during the induction phase.

These findings are significant because it demonstrates a significant difference between the anti-GBM model and the NTS model when investigating the role podocytes play in glomerulonephritis. It further supports the notion that therapies need to be tailored not only to the specific disease but also the particular mechanism underlying each disease process. We found that the anti-GBM model induced a rapid illness in the mice that was often fatal (up to 50% of animals) in a relatively short period of time. The severity of the anti-GBM model may result from the injection with normal rabbit IgG in Freund's complete adjuvant prior to the anti-GBM antibody. This pre-sensitization step may lead to a more severe disease not only due to the immune system being primed to react to the rabbit IgG but also due to the non-specific inflammatory effect from Freund’s complete adjuvant.

The NTS model does have a heterologous phase, as reported by the manufacturer, which behaves similarly to the anti-GBM in that it results in IgG and C3 deposition in the glomerulus and proteinuria within a few days. However, contrary to the anti-GBM model, the NTS model had a much lower mortality rate, which could be due to the lack of the pre-sensitization step, thus allowing us to evaluate the disease in the autologous phase. Given the more indolent nature of most glomerulonephritis in humans, NTS seems like the more clinically similar model to study for human application.

Additionally, it has been suggested that podocytes are involved in making glomerular crescents [5761]. Our observed decrease in glomerular crescents in the podocyte-specific FcRn knockout mice in both models is provocative as it would suggest FcRn is involved in crescent formation. To our knowledge, no prior study has investigated the role of FcRn in crescent formation. The exact mechanisms by which the absence of FcRn prevents crescent formation may have to do with impaired podocyte mobility, alterations in actin dynamics or impaired intracellular signaling. The mechanism underlying how FcRn may affect these pathways is unknown but we have found that knockout of FcRn KO in cultured podocytes alters mobility and actin dynamics [37]. In addition, when comparing the relative quantity of the crescents between the two models, we found significantly fewer glomeruli in the anti-GBM had crescents compared to the NTS model, which is suggestive that crescent formation is more dependent on the autologous phase than the heterologous phase of glomerulonephritis. This information may prove valuable when trying to determine the exact mechanism leading to crescent formation.

A potential area for future study could be aimed at investigating if there is a difference in other models of disease. An example of this might be achieved by breeding our podFcRn KO mouse onto a spontaneous lupus nephritis model which could yield interesting findings. Another area of study would be to create an inducible knockout of podocyte-specific FcRn. This would allow investigation into whether knocking out or blocking FcRn in podocytes after disease onset would modulate the disease course and thus suggest a therapeutic option to treat glomerulonephritis.

In summary, we have shown that induction of anti-GBM nephritis is not dependent on podocyte FcRn but that podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn leads to a significant reduction in crescent formation. Furthermore, we have shown that podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn can significantly reduce albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and crescent formation in the autologous phase of NTS, suggesting podocyte FcRn plays a significant role in disease progression.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. IL-2 assay using splenocytes as antigen presenting cells.

There is no T cell production of IL-2 when splenocytes are treated with media or IgG alone but there is a significant increase in IL-2 production when splenocytes are incubated wth immune complexes (IgG + Ova). a, p<0.001.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Histologic analysis of control and podocyte FcRn KO mice injected with IgG control and saline.

There was no difference in glomerulosclerosis scores between control mice and podocyte FcRn KO mice injected with saline (sal) nor with control IgG (IgG). n = 2 mice per group. Scale bars in lower left corner are 20μm.

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK) [grants 1R01DK104264-01A1, 5R01DK082509-05, and 5T32DK007135-42] a Norman Coplon Satellite Healthcare grant, and a Denver Health Medical Center Pilot Grant.

References

  • 1.Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, Ayanian J, Balkrishnan R, Bragg-Gresham J, et al. US Renal Data System 2014 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2015;66(1 Suppl 1):Svii, S1-305. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tipping PG, Huang XR, Qi M, Van GY, Tang WW. Crescentic glomerulonephritis in CD4- and CD8-deficient mice. Requirement for CD4 but not CD8 cells. The American journal of pathology. 1998;152(6):1541–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muller GA, Muller CA, Markovic-Lipkovski J, Kilper RB, Risler T. Renal, major histocompatibility complex antigens and cellular components in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis identified by monoclonal antibodies. Nephron. 1988;49(2):132–9. 10.1159/000185039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li S, Holdsworth SR, Tipping PG. MHC class I pathway is not required for the development of crescentic glomerulonephritis in mice. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2000;122(3):453–8. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01387.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li S, Kurts C, Köntgen F, Holdsworth SR, Tipping PG. Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Expression by Intrinsic Renal Cells Is Required for Crescentic Glomerulonephritis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1998;188(3):597–602. 10.1084/jem.188.3.597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goldwich A, Burkard M, Olke M, Daniel C, Amann K, Hugo C, et al. Podocytes are nonhematopoietic professional antigen-presenting cells. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2013;24(6):906–16. 10.1681/ASN.2012020133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reiser J, von Gersdorff G, Loos M, Oh J, Asanuma K, Giardino L, et al. Induction of B7-1 in podocytes is associated with nephrotic syndrome. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2004;113(10):1390–7. 10.1172/JCI20402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Salant DJ. Podocyte Expression of B7-1/CD80: Is it a Reliable Biomarker for the Treatment of Proteinuric Kidney Diseases with Abatacept? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2016;27(4):963–5. 10.1681/ASN.2015080947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roopenian DC, Christianson GJ, Sproule TJ, Brown AC, Akilesh S, Jung N, et al. The MHC class I-like IgG receptor controls perinatal IgG transport, IgG homeostasis, and fate of IgG-Fc-coupled drugs. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2003;170(7):3528–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pyzik M, Rath T, Lencer WI, Baker K, Blumberg RS. FcRn: The architect behind the immune and non-immune functions of IgG and albumin. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2015;194(10):4595–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim J, Bronson CL, Hayton WL, Radmacher MD, Roopenian DC, Robinson JM, et al. Albumin turnover: FcRn-mediated recycling saves as much albumin from degradation as the liver produces. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2006;290(2):G352–60. 10.1152/ajpgi.00286.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Montoyo HP, Vaccaro C, Hafner M, Ober RJ, Mueller W, Ward ES. Conditional deletion of the MHC class I-related receptor FcRn reveals the sites of IgG homeostasis in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(8):2788–93. 10.1073/pnas.0810796106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Akilesh S, Huber TB, Wu H, Wang G, Hartleben B, Kopp JB, et al. Podocytes use FcRn to clear IgG from the glomerular basement membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(3):967–72. 10.1073/pnas.0711515105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haymann JP, Levraud JP, Bouet S, Kappes V, Hagege J, Nguyen G, et al. Characterization and localization of the neonatal Fc receptor in adult human kidney. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2000;11(4):632–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sarav M, Wang Y, Hack BK, Chang A, Jensen M, Bao L, et al. Renal FcRn reclaims albumin but facilitates elimination of IgG. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2009;20(9):1941–52. 10.1681/ASN.2008090976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tenten V, Menzel S, Kunter U, Sicking EM, van Roeyen CR, Sanden SK, et al. Albumin is recycled from the primary urine by tubular transcytosis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2013;24(12):1966–80. 10.1681/ASN.2013010018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weflen AW, Baier N, Tang QJ, Van den Hof M, Blumberg RS, Lencer WI, et al. Multivalent immune complexes divert FcRn to lysosomes by exclusion from recycling sorting tubules. Molecular biology of the cell. 2013;24(15):2398–405. 10.1091/mbc.E13-04-0174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tian Z, Sutton BJ, Zhang X. Distribution of rat neonatal Fc receptor in the principal organs of neonatal and pubertal rats. Journal of receptor and signal transduction research. 2014;34(2):137–42. 10.3109/10799893.2013.865745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dickson LE, Wagner MC, Sandoval RM, Molitoris BA. The proximal tubule and albuminuria: really! Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2014;25(3):443–53. 10.1681/ASN.2013090950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baker K, Qiao S.-W., Kuo T. T., Aveson V.G., Platzer B., Andersen J-T, et al. Neonatal Fc Receptor for IgG (FcRn) Regulates Cross-presentation of IgG Immune Complexes by CD8-CD11b Dendritic Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(24):9927–932. 10.1073/pnas.1019037108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dalloneau E, Baroukh N, Mavridis K, Maillet A, Gueugnon F, Courty Y, et al. Downregulation of the neonatal Fc receptor expression in non-small cell lung cancer tissue is associated with a poor prognosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):54415–29. 10.18632/oncotarget.10074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frigo G, Tramentozzi E, Orso G, Ceolotto G, Pagetta A, Stagni C, et al. Human IgGs induce synthesis and secretion of IgGs and neonatal Fc receptor in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Immunobiology. 2016;221(12):1329–42. 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kuo TT, Baker K, Yoshida M, Qiao SW, Aveson VG, Lencer WI, et al. Neonatal Fc receptor: from immunity to therapeutics. Journal of clinical immunology. 2010;30(6):777–89. 10.1007/s10875-010-9468-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.M P, T R, WI L, K B, RS B. FcRn: The Architect Behind the Immune and Nonimmune Functions of IgG and Albumin. Journal of Immunology. 2015;194(10):4595–603. 10.4049/jimmunol.1403014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qiao SW, Kobayashi K, Johansen FE, Sollid LM, Andersen JT, Milford E, et al. Dependence of antibody-mediated presentation of antigen on FcRn. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(27):9337–42. 10.1073/pnas.0801717105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rath T, Baker K, Pyzik M, Blumberg RS. Regulation of immune responses by the neonatal fc receptor and its therapeutic implications. Frontiers in immunology. 2014;5:664 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Olaru F, Luo W, Suleiman H, St John PL, Ge L, Mezo AR, et al. Neonatal Fc receptor promotes immune complex-mediated glomerular disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2014;25(5):918–25. 10.1681/ASN.2013050498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goldwich A, Burkard M, Ölke M, Daniel C, Amann K, Hugo C, et al. Podocytes Are Nonhematopoietic Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2013;24(6):906–16. 10.1681/ASN.2012020133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schrijver G, Bogman MJ, Assmann KJ, de Waal RM, Robben HC, van Gasteren H, et al. Anti-GBM nephritis in the mouse: role of granulocytes in the heterologous phase. Kidney international. 1990;38(1):86–95. 10.1038/ki.1990.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Assmann KJ, Tangelder MM, Lange WP, Schrijver G, Koene RA. Anti-GBM nephritis in the mouse: severe proteinuria in the heterologous phase. Virchows Archiv A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology. 1985;406(3):285–99. 10.1007/BF00704298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Truong LD, Trostel J, Garcia GE. Absence of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha7 subunit amplifies inflammation and accelerates onset of fibrosis: an inflammatory kidney model. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2015;29(8):3558–70. 10.1096/fj.14-262493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Trostel J, Truong LD, Roncal-Jimenez C, Miyazaki M, Miyazaki-Anzai S, Kuwabara M, et al. Different effects of global osteopontin and macrophage osteopontin in glomerular injury. American journal of physiology Renal physiology. 2018;315(4):F759–f68. 10.1152/ajprenal.00458.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoppe JM, Vielhauer V. Induction and analysis of nephrotoxic serum nephritis in mice. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). 2014;1169:159–74. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0882-0_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Corradetti C, Jog NR, Gallucci S, Madaio M, Balachandran S, Caricchio R. Immune-Mediated Nephropathy and Systemic Autoimmunity in Mice Does Not Require Receptor Interacting Protein Kinase 3 (RIPK3). PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163611 10.1371/journal.pone.0163611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dobrinskikh E, Lewis L, Brian Doctor R, Okamura K, Lee MG, Altmann C, et al. Shank2 Regulates Renal Albumin Endocytosis. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(9). 10.14814/phy2.12510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dylewski J, Dobrinskikh E, Lewis L, Tonsawan P, Miyazaki M, Jat PS, et al. Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo. PloS one. 2019;14(2):e0209732 10.1371/journal.pone.0209732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tonsawan P, Dylewski J, Lewis L, Blaine J. Knockout of the neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn) in cultured podocytes alters IL-6 signaling and the actin cytoskeleton. American journal of physiology Cell physiology. 2019. 10.1152/ajpcell.00235.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Montoyo HP, Vaccaro C, Hafner M, Ober RJ, Mueller W, Ward ES. Conditional deletion of the MHC class I-related receptor FcRn reveals the sites of IgG homeostasis in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(8):2788–93. 10.1073/pnas.0810796106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry. 1971;8(9):871–4. 10.1016/0019-2791(71)90454-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thurman JM, Tchepeleva SN, Haas M, Panzer S, Boackle SA, Glogowska MJ, et al. Complement alternative pathway activation in the autologous phase of nephrotoxic serum nephritis. American journal of physiology Renal physiology. 2012;302(12):F1529–36. 10.1152/ajprenal.00422.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xia Y, Campbell SR, Broder A, Herlitz L, Abadi M, Wu P, et al. Inhibition of the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway attenuates renal disease in nephrotoxic serum nephritis. Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla). 2012;145(2):108–21. 10.1016/j.clim.2012.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goto K, Kaneko Y, Sato Y, Otsuka T, Yamamoto S, Goto S, et al. Leptin deficiency down-regulates IL-23 production in glomerular podocytes resulting in an attenuated immune response in nephrotoxic serum nephritis. International immunology. 2016;28(4):197–208. 10.1093/intimm/dxv067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Eller K, Schroll A, Banas M, Kirsch AH, Huber JM, Nairz M, et al. Lipocalin-2 expressed in innate immune cells is an endogenous inhibitor of inflammation in murine nephrotoxic serum nephritis. PloS one. 2013;8(7):e67693 10.1371/journal.pone.0067693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chalmers SA, Chitu V, Herlitz LC, Sahu R, Stanley ER, Putterman C. Macrophage depletion ameliorates nephritis induced by pathogenic antibodies. Journal of autoimmunity. 2015;57:42–52. 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dai Y, Chen A, Liu R, Gu L, Sharma S, Cai W, et al. Retinoic acid improves nephrotoxic serum-induced glomerulonephritis through activation of podocyte retinoic acid receptor alpha. Kidney international. 2017;92(6):1444–57. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Scott NA, Zhao Y, Krishnamurthy B, Mannering SI, Kay TWH, Thomas HE. IFNgamma-Induced MHC Class II Expression on Islet Endothelial Cells Is an Early Marker of Insulitis but Is Not Required for Diabetogenic CD4(+) T Cell Migration. Frontiers in immunology. 2018;9:2800 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Steimle V, Siegrist CA, Mottet A, Lisowska-Grospierre B, Mach B. Regulation of MHC class II expression by interferon-gamma mediated by the transactivator gene CIITA. Science (New York, NY). 1994;265(5168):106–9. 10.1126/science.8016643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Boehm U, Klamp T, Groot M, Howard JC. Cellular responses to interferon-gamma. Annual review of immunology. 1997;15:749–95. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Baudeau C, Delarue F, Hé CJ, Nguyen G, Adida C, Peraldi MN, et al. Induction of MHC class II molecules HLA-DR, -DP and -DQ and ICAM 1 in human podocytes by gamma-interferon. Exp Nephrol. 1994;2(5):306–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Collins T, Korman AJ, Wake CT, Boss JM, Kappes DJ, Fiers W, et al. Immune interferon activates multiple class II major histocompatibility complex genes and the associated invariant chain gene in human endothelial cells and dermal fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1984;81(15):4917–21. 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Giroux M, Schmidt M, Descoteaux A. IFN-γ-Induced MHC Class II Expression: Transactivation of Class II Transactivator Promoter IV by IFN Regulatory Factor-1 is Regulated by Protein Kinase C-α. The Journal of Immunology. 2003;171(8):4187–94. 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Steimle V, Siegrist C, Mottet A, Lisowska-Grospierre B, Mach B. Regulation of MHC class II expression by interferon-gamma mediated by the transactivator gene CIITA. Science. 1994;265(5168):106–9. 10.1126/science.8016643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang Q, Luan H, Wang L, He F, Zhou H, Xu X, et al. Galectin-9 ameliorates anti-GBM glomerulonephritis by inhibiting Th1 and Th17 immune responses in mice. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 2014;306(8):F822–F32. 10.1152/ajprenal.00294.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Müller R, Daniel C, Hugo C, Amann K, Mielenz D, Endlich K, et al. The mitogen-activated protein kinase p38α regulates tubular damage in murine anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e56316–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Du Y, An S, Liu L, Li L, Zhou XJ, Mason RP, et al. Serial non-invasive monitoring of renal disease following immune-mediated injury using near-infrared optical imaging. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e43941–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Toda N, Mori K, Kasahara M, Ishii A, Koga K, Ohno S, et al. Crucial Role of Mesangial Cell-derived Connective Tissue Growth Factor in a Mouse Model of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Glomerulonephritis. Scientific reports. 2017;7:42114-. 10.1038/srep42114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Moeller MJ, Soofi A, Hartmann I, Le Hir M, Wiggins R, Kriz W, et al. Podocytes populate cellular crescents in a murine model of inflammatory glomerulonephritis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2004;15(1):61–7. 10.1097/01.asn.0000102468.37809.c6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Thorner PS, Ho M, Eremina V, Sado Y, Quaggin S. Podocytes contribute to the formation of glomerular crescents. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2008;19(3):495–502. 10.1681/ASN.2006101115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sistani L, Rodriguez PQ, Hultenby K, Uhlen M, Betsholtz C, Jalanko H, et al. Neuronal proteins are novel components of podocyte major processes and their expression in glomerular crescents supports their role in crescent formation. Kidney international. 2013;83(1):63–71. 10.1038/ki.2012.321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gaut JP, Hoshi M, Jain S, Liapis H. Claudin 1 and nephrin label cellular crescents in diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Human pathology. 2014;45(3):628–35. 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.10.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rizzo P, Novelli R, Rota C, Gagliardini E, Ruggiero B, Rottoli D, et al. The Role of Angiotensin II in Parietal Epithelial Cell Proliferation and Crescent Formation in Glomerular Diseases. The American journal of pathology. 2017;187(11):2441–50. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Zhanjun Jia

6 Mar 2020

PONE-D-20-05364

Podocyte-specific knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) results in differential protection depending on the model of immune-mediated kidney disease

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Dylewski,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Apr 20 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Zhanjun Jia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please address the concerns from the experts.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide method(s) of sacrifice/euthanasia in the Methods section of your manuscript.

3. As part of your revision, please complete and submit a copy of the ARRIVE Guidelines checklist, a document that aims to improve experimental reporting and reproducibility of animal studies for purposes of post-publication data analysis and reproducibility: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines. Please include your completed checklist as a Supporting Information file. Note that if your paper is accepted for publication, this checklist will be published as part of your article.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"NO"

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support received during this specific study (whether external or internal to your organization) as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  

  2. Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funder. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting and significant research work. The authors demonstrated that induction of anti-GBM nephritis is not dependent on podocyte FcRn and lack of podocyte FcRn was protective in immune mediated kidney disease that is dependent on an autologous phase. Their findings suggested that specific therapies should be tailored according to the specific disease and the certain stage. The experiments were performed by utilizing two different mouse models of immune-mediated nephritis, the methodologies used were adequate.

Suggestions:

1. Since authors mentioned in the discussion that podocytes are involved in making glomerular crescents and FcRn deficiency alters mobility and actin dynamics in cultured podocytes, it seems logical to check the situation of podocyte injury in vivo in their own FcRn KO mice with or without anti-GBM antibody treatment.

2. The NTS model also has a heterologous phase although within a few days, since authors propose podocyte FcRn as a renoprotective factor mainly involved in autologous phase but not the heterologous phase, it is better to examine the effects of podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn in the heterologous phase of NTS model.

3. The Fig 4 lacks the panel H.

4. Please explain why the control groups were missed in the in vivo experiments (anti-GBM nephritis and NTS neohritis models).

5. At the beginning of this muscript, authors mentioned that immune-mediated nephritis is the third leading cause of end stage kidney disease in the United States (1). While in the Ref 1, authors seems not mention the third leading cause of end stage kidney disease in US. Could the authors provide the detail of its source?

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript entitled as “Podocyte-specific knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) results in differential protection depending on the model of immune-mediated kidney disease”, the authors first proved that podocyte could function as antigen presenting cells. FcRn was implicated in this process by using FcRn KO podocytes. Results in the NTS mice model demonstrated that podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn reduced albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and crescent formation. They fairly interpreted the data and clearly presented the results in the manuscript. The quality of the manuscript could be further improved once the following issues had been addressed.

Major concerns:

1. The quality of the images should be improved.

2. Please provide profile of the KO podocyte, e.g. the knockout efficiency, the cellular characteristics of the podocytes, in Figure 1. Does the FcRn knockout affect the morphology of the podocytes?

3. Please prove that FcRn was specifically knocked out in the podocyte in the animal model.

4. The authors collected urine for the analysis of albuminuria. How was the urine collected? Was it 12h or 24h urine?

5. Other than what described in Figure 3, is there any abnormality in the renal function in the FcRn fl/fl;Pod-Cre mice?

6. Normal controls that were not injected with anti-GBM antibody should be included in Figure 3 &4 to prove the establishment of model.

7. The quality of the immunofluorescent staining shown in Figure 3D should be improved, as the green fluorescence with the similar intensity as the positive staining also present in the tubular.

Minor concerns:

1. Was the person who performed the histological scoring of glomeruli blinded to the grouping?

2. Please describe the successful rate and mortality rate of anti-GBM nephritis model and nephrotoxic serum nephritis models in the Methods section. How many mice per group were used at the start of modeling?

3. In the Methods for the immunofluorescence for fixed cells, please name the type of normal serum used for blocking.

4. In Figure 1, the authors found that IFNγ-stimulation induced significant increase of MHCII in the podocytes. Please specify the control used for comparison.

5. Please discuss the results in Figure 1.

6. The numbering of the images in Figure 3 was not consistent with the figure legend.

7. What is the unit of the Y axis in Figure 3B?

8. Please counter-stain the nuclei in the Figure 3C.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0230401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230401.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Dec 2020

We appreciate the reviewers’ detailed and thoughtful comments that have helped to improve this manuscript. Below is our response to the reviewers:

Reviewer #1:

Since authors mentioned in the discussion that podocytes are involved in making

glomerular crescents and FcRn deficiency alters mobility and actin dynamics in

cultured podocytes, it seems logical to check the situation of podocyte injury in vivo

in their own FcRn KO mice with or without anti-GBM antibody treatment.

We have provided histologic analysis of control and podocyte specific FcRn KO mice injected with saline as well as a non-specific rabbit IgG control in supplemental figure 2. We observed no difference in glomerulosclerosis scores between the control and podocyte specific FcRn KO mice injected with saline or rabbit IgG.

The NTS model also has a heterologous phase although within a few days, since

authors propose podocyte FcRn as a renoprotective factor mainly involved in

autologous phase but not the heterologous phase, it is better to examine the effects

of podocyte-specific knockout of FcRn in the heterologous phase of NTS model.

Our aim in this paper was to determine the ability of podocytes to act as antigen presenting cells and whether targeting the podocytes ability to present antigen could attenuate the adaptive immune response leading to glomerulonephritis. The heterologous phase of the NTS consists of the innate immune response which should not be dependent on antigen presentation by podocytes. As such, we feel the study of the podocyte FcRn on the innate immune response extends beyond the scope of this paper and should be investigated separately.

The Fig 4 lacks the panel H.

This was a labeling error and it has been corrected.

Please explain why the control groups were missed in the in vivo experiments

(anti-GBM nephritis and NTS nephritis models).

The in vivo experiments were performed in podocyte specific FcRn knockout mice and control mice (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) which lacked the cre expression and thus had normal FcRn expression. All analysis compared the control mice (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) and the podocyte specific FcRn knockout mice (podoFcRn fl/fl;Cre/+) to determine the relative effect podocyte FcRn had on disease severity.

“Sham” controls of intravenous saline and non-specific IgG were performed and now included in Supplemental Figure 2.

At the beginning of this manuscript, authors mentioned that immune-mediated

nephritis is the third leading cause of end stage kidney disease in the United States

(1). While in the Ref 1, authors seems not mention the third leading cause of end

stage kidney disease in US. Could the authors provide the detail of its source?

The United States Renal Data Systems (USRDS), lists glomerulonephritis as the third leading cause for End Stage Kidney disease in the United States. We have changed our wording of “immune mediated kidney disease” to “glomerulonephritis” in order to be more specific to the type of diseases we are investigating.

Reviewer #2

Major concerns:

The quality of the images should be improved.

Representative images using the highest resolution of the images available were included in this resubmission. Furthermore, the PDFs containing these images are now saved as ‘Press Quality’ to ensure the resolution is preserved during the uploading process. Some images are more pixelated because these images were obtained at a lower power magnification that resulted in the loss of resolution when zoomed in to focus on individual glomeruli.

Please provide profile of the KO podocyte, e.g. the knockout efficiency, the

cellular characteristics of the podocytes, in Figure 1. Does the FcRn knockout affect

the morphology of the podocytes?

WT and KO podocytes were characterized in the following paper: Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo Dylewski et al., PLoS One 2019, PMCID: PMC6392300. KO podocytes have similar morphology to KO podocytes but do have differences in the actin cytoskeleton (Knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor in cultured podocytes alters IL-6 signaling and the actin cytoskeleton. Tonsawan et al., AJP Cell Physiol, 2019 PMCID: PMC6879880).

Please prove that FcRn was specifically knocked out in the podocyte in the animal

model.

Podocyte-specific KO mice were characterized in: Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo Dylewski et al., PLoS One 2019, PMCID: PMC6392300. Additional characterization as well as details on genotyping and generation of these mice are described in Generating a Podocyte-Specific Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn) Knockout Mouse. Blaine J. Methods Molecular Biology, Vol. 2224, ShreeRam Singh et al. (Eds): Mouse Genetics, Springer Nature, 2020, accepted. In this chapter we show that staining for FcRn in vivo is absent in the glomerular locations in which podocytes are found in podocyte-specfic FcRn KO mice but is present in the endothelium. We also demonstrate that staining for FcRn is minimal in podocytes isolated from podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice compared to podocytes isolated from control mice.

The authors collected urine for the analysis of albuminuria. How was the urine

collected? Was it 12h or 24h urine?

The urine was a spot (random collection)

Other than what described in Figure 3, is there any abnormality in the renal

function in the FcRn fl/fl;Pod-Cre mice?

In our previous paper, Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo Dylewski et al., PLoS One 2019, PMCID: PMC6392300, we show that 3 month old podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice have normal levels of serum albumin, similar albuminuria and similar GFRs compared to control mice. In the experiments described in this paper we used mice that were 10 – 12 weeks of age.

Normal controls that were not injected with anti-GBM antibody should be included

in Figure 3 &4 to prove the establishment of model.

The in vivo experiments were performed in podocyte specific FcRn knockout mice and control mice (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) which lacked the cre expression and thus had normal FcRn expression. All analysis compared the control mice (FcRn fl/fl;+/+) and the podocyte specific FcRn knockout mice (podoFcRn fl/fl;Cre/+) to determine the relative effect podocyte FcRn had on disease severity.

“Sham” controls of intravenous saline and non-specific IgG were performed and now included in Supplemental Figure 2.

The quality of the immunofluorescent staining shown in Figure 3D should be

improved, as the green fluorescence with the similar intensity as the positive

staining also present in the tubular.

The staining in Figure 3D has been redone.

Minor concerns:

1. Was the person who performed the histological scoring of glomeruli blinded to the

grouping?

Yes, all histologic analysis was performed in a blinded fashion.

2. Please describe the successful rate and mortality rate of anti-GBM nephritis

model and nephrotoxic serum nephritis models in the Methods section. How many

mice per group were used at the start of modeling?

For the anti-GBM mice mortality was as follows: one control and two podocyte-specific FcRn Ko mice died during the experiment. Starting numbers were 11 control and 12 podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice.

For the NTS experiments, one control and one podocyte-specific FcRn KO mouse died so starting numbers were as follows: 9 control and 8 podocyte-specific FcRn KO mice. This information has been added to the Methods section.

3. In the Methods for the immunofluorescence for fixed cells, please name the type

of normal serum used for blocking.

This section was included in error. In this manuscript there is no immunofluorescence on fixed cells so this section of the Methods has been removed.

4. In Figure 1, the authors found that IFNγ-stimulation induced significant increase

of MHCII in the podocytes. Please specify the control used for comparison.

The control used was podocytes treated with regular media without any IFN�.

5. Please discuss the results in Figure 1.

It is established that cells, including podocytes, can express MHCII after exposure to INF�. Since FcRn is involved in antigen loading on MHCII, the experiments in Figure 1 were performed to ensure that knockout of FcRn did not alter the podocytes ability to express MHCII and co-stimulatory markers and thus impair the FcRn KO podocytes ability to present antigen. This has been added to the discussion section.

6. The numbering of the images in Figure 3 was not consistent with the figure

legend.

The numbering has been changed to ensure they are correct and aligned with what is described in the text.

7. What is the unit of the Y axis in Figure 3B?

The units for the Y axis in Figure 3B is OD450 and have been added to the figure.

8. Please counter-stain the nuclei in the Figure 3C.

Figure 3C is demonstrating the presence of C3 within the kidney. Since C3 deposition is not specific to the location of cells, nuclei staining was not performed in this portion of the analysis. Staining for actin was performed to identify structural components within the kidney.

Decision Letter 1

Zhanjun Jia

9 Dec 2020

Podocyte-specific knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) results in differential protection depending on the model of glomerulonephritis

PONE-D-20-05364R1

Dear Dr. Dylewski,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Zhanjun Jia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Zhanjun Jia

14 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-05364R1

Podocyte-specific knockout of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) results in differential protection depending on the model of glomerulonephritis.

Dear Dr. Dylewski:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Zhanjun Jia

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. IL-2 assay using splenocytes as antigen presenting cells.

    There is no T cell production of IL-2 when splenocytes are treated with media or IgG alone but there is a significant increase in IL-2 production when splenocytes are incubated wth immune complexes (IgG + Ova). a, p<0.001.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Histologic analysis of control and podocyte FcRn KO mice injected with IgG control and saline.

    There was no difference in glomerulosclerosis scores between control mice and podocyte FcRn KO mice injected with saline (sal) nor with control IgG (IgG). n = 2 mice per group. Scale bars in lower left corner are 20μm.

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES