Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244483

Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes

Giacomo Zoppini 1,*, Corinna Bergamini 2, Maddalena Trombetta 1, Alessandro Mantovani 1, Giovanni Targher 1, Anna Toffalini 1, Cristina Bittante 1, Enzo Bonora 1
Editor: Yoshihiro Fukumoto3
PMCID: PMC7769446  PMID: 33370380

Abstract

Insulin dose has been found to associate to several cardiometabolic risk factors in type 1 diabetes. Changes over time in body weight and composition may partly explain this association. However, no data are available on the relationship between insulin dose and echocardiographic parameters of both systolic and diastolic function in type 1 diabetes. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine systolic and diastolic echocardiographic parameters in relation to insulin dose in young patients with type 1 diabetes. The study was carried out on 93 consecutive outpatients with type 1 diabetes with a mean age of 32.8 ± 9.8 years. All patients were examined with a transthoracic echocardiography. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. The median value of daily insulin dose was used to categorized patients in two groups: high and low insulin dose group. Patients belonging to the high insulin dose group showed higher levels of cardiometabolic risk factors such as BMI, triglycerides and TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Indexes of both systolic and diastolic function were similar in both groups except isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), that was significantly prolonged in patients of the high insulin group (94.4 ± 15.0 vs 86.7 ± 13.1 ms, p = 0.008). In the multivariate regression analysis, insulin dose was positively and significantly associated with IVRT. In this study we report an association between insulin dose and impaired active diastolic myocardial relaxation. Future studies are needed to further explore this observation.

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes has been reported to increase the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [1]. Previous studies in type 2 diabetes have suggested an association between hyperinsulinemia and increased risk of cardiovascular events [2].

Recently, it has been reported an association between insulin dose and several cardiometabolic risk factors in type 1 diabetes [3]. However, despite the adverse trends of the cardiometabolic risk factors, no association has been detected between insulin dose and the incident cardiovascular events [3]. Insulin dose may change over time in relation to different factors, among them there are aging, weight gain and changes in body composition. An underlying common ground may be an increased insulin resistance that could follow body weight and composition changes [4]. Higher insulin dose has been associated with higher blood pressure, BMI, pulse rate and pulse pressure [3, 5].

No data are available on the relationship between insulin dose and echocardiographic indexes of systolic and diastolic function. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate parameters of both systolic and diastolic function according to insulin dose in a well characterized cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out on 93 consecutive outpatients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 32.8 ± 9.8 years) attending our clinic as previously described [6]. Type 1 diabetes was the inclusion criteria. The minimum age was 19 and the maximum age was 60 years. Known heart diseases was an exclusion criteria as well as pregnancy. All participants were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography using an Esaote My Lab 70 (Esaote Spa, Genoa, Italy). The study was approved by the local ethic committee (University and Hospital Trust of Verona), and the informed consent was obtained.

Standard echocardiographic windows were employed to measure left ventricular diameters, wall thickness, end diastolic and systolic volumes of the left ventricle (LV) and left atrial volume (LAV). Mitral pulsed-wave Doppler was used to measure the A and E weave peaks. Pulse-wave tissue Doppler was performed to obtain septal and lateral mitral annulus indexes. The mean value of septal and lateral annulus E’ wave was used for the analysis. Isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) was calculated as the time from aortic valve closure to mitral valve opening by placing the continuous Doppler between the outflow and the inflow tracts.

Clinical data, duration of diabetes, lifestyle attitudes, were collected. Body mass index was calculated by dividing weight in kilogramsa by the square of height in meters. Blood pressure was measure in supine position and hypertension was considered for values ≥ 140/90 mmHg. Laboratory blood measurements were determined by standard laboratory procedures on blood samples drawn in the morning after an overnight fast. Creatinine was measured using a modified Jaffé method and other biochemical blood measurements were determined by standard laboratory procedures. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured by high performance liquid chromatography and standardized according to IFCC. Patients with type 1 diabetes were categorized by the sex-specific median value of the daily insulin dose that was 42 U in men and 32 U in women.

Statistical analysis

Data are summarized by means ± SD, median and proportions. Comparisons between groups were performed by t-test, non-parametric tests and χ2-test for categorical variables. Bivariate linear correlations were tested by Pearson and Spearmen coefficients. Confounding factors were evaluated in a forced entry multivariate linear regression analysis. Covariates for this multivariate regression model were chosen as potential confounding factors based on their significance in univariable regression analyses or based on their biological plausibility. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 32.8 ± 9.8 years) were categorized by the sex-specific median value of the daily insulin dose that was 42 U in men and 32 U in women. Sixteen patients were on insulin pump and the insulin dose was lower in these patients (28.8 ± 15.4 vs 42.5 ± 19.7, p = 0.01). No association was detected between the dichotomous insulin dose variable and sex (p = 0.259). Table 1 shows that subjects with insulin dose above the median value had a higher BMI (25.1 ± 3.9 vs 22.7 ± 3.0 Kg/m2, p = 0.001), a HbA1c above target as shown by the glycated hemoglobin (8.1 ± 1.1 vs 7.4 ± 0.9%, p = 0.001) and a higher level of triglycerides (1.3 ± 0.7 vs 0.9 ± 0.4 mmol/l, p = 002). The TG/HDL ratio was significantly higher in patients in the higher insulin dose group (2.28 ± 1.77 vs 1.30 ± 0.69, p = 0.001). Heart rate was slightly elevated in the group with higher daily insulin dose (77.0 ± 13.2 vs 71.6 ± 11.0 bpm, p = 0.045). The bivariate correlation analysis (Table 2) showed significant correlations of daily insulin dose with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, triglycerides levels and triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL ratio) only in patients of the higher insulin dose group, while a significant correlation with glycated hemoglobin was present only in patients of the low insulin dose group. IVRT did not show linear correlations with diastolic parameters, whereas it was strongly correlated with insulin dose (r = 0.29, p = 0.005).

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the clinical characteristics of subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus according to the sex-specific median insulin dose.

Under the median insulin dose (n = 43) Above the median insulin dose (n = 50) p value
Age, yrs 34.3 ± 8.9 31.5 ± 10.4 0.172
Sex, F/M 21/22 20/30 0.259
BMI, kg/m2 22.7 ± 3.0 25.1 ± 3.9 0.001
Diabetes duration, yrs 17.2 ± 11.5 19.4 ± 9.0 0.310
Systolic pressure, mmHg 124.6 ± 12.4 126.8 ± 12.4 0.512
Diastolic pressure, mmHg 75.0 ± 7.9 76.6 ± 7.0 0.331
Heart rate, bpm 71.6 ± 11.0 77.0 ± 13.2 0.045
HbA1c,% 7.4 ± 0.9 8.1 ± 1.1 0.001
Total Cholesterol, mmol/l 4.5 ± 0.7 4.6 ± 0.9 0.467
HDL cholesterol, mmol/l 1.6 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.4 0.140
Triglycerides, mmol/l 0.9 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.7 0.002
TG/HDL ratio 1.30 ± 0.69 2.28 ± 1.77 0.001
eGFRCKD-EPI, ml/min/1.73 m2 107.4 ± 15.0 110.0 ± 14.2 0.392

Values are means ± SD, percentages or percentage. BMI: body mass index. T1D: type 1 diabetes. HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; eGFRCKD-EPI: estimated glomerular filtration rate. HDL: high-density lipoprotein. TG: triglycerides.

Table 2. Bivariate correlations between insulin dose and cardiovascular risk factors stratified by the sex-specific median value of insulin dose.

Under the median insulin dose (n = 43) p Above the median insulin dose(n = 50) p
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 0.30 0.055 0.35 0.012
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg -0.02 0.894 0.40 0.004
Heart rate, bpm -0,10 0.785 0.25 0.870
BMI, kg/m2 0.16 0.293 0.29 0.035
HDL cholesterol, mmol/l -0.15 0.365 -0.22 0.141
Triglycerides, mmol/l 0.05 0.754 0.30 0.045
TG/HDL ratio 0.05 0.759 0.33 0.029
Glycated Hemoglobin, % 0.39 0.009 -0.13 0.377

BMI: body mass index; HDL: high density lipoprotein. TG/HDL: triglycerides to HDL cholesterol ratio.

Echocardiographic parameters in relation to daily insulin dose are reported in Table 3. Ejection fraction, LV mass, left atrial volume index (LAVI), E/A ratio and E/e’ ratio did not differ between the two groups. IVRT was significantly higher in patients in the higher daily insulin dose group (94.4 ± 15.0 vs 86.7 ± 13.1 ms, p = 0.008). To further analyze the factors associated with the IVRT, we performed a multivariate linear regression model with IVRT as the dependent variable (Table 4). Insulin dose was positively and significantly associated with IVRT (p = 0.005). The results remained the same when insulin dose to weight (U/Kg/day) was used.

Table 3. Echocardiographic characteristics of type 1 diabetic patients according to the sex-specific median insulin dose.

Under the median insulin dose (n = 43) Above the median insulin dose (n = 50) p
Ventricular septal thickness, mm 8.6 ± 1.4 8.8 ± 1.2 0.488
LV mass/BSA, g/m2 64.9 ± 15.5 64.0 ± 15.0 0.778
LA volume index, ml/m2 20.1 ± 4.5 19.4 ± 4.7 0.457
LV ejection fraction, % 63.4 ± 6.0 63.1 ± 5.0 0.773
Septal s’ velocity, cm/s 0.110 ± 0.023 0.108 ± 0.021 0.533
E/A ratio 1.52 ± 0.39 1.51 ± 0.45 0.913
E/e’ ratio 5.12 ± 1.02 5.17 ± 1.19 0.833
IVRT, ms 86.7 ± 13.1 94.4 ± 15.0 0.008

Values are means ± SD or percentages. LV: left ventricular. °LV mass/BSA was calculated using the following formula: (0.8*(1.04*(LVDd+IVSd+PWd)3-(LVDd)3))+0.6/body surface area. IVRT: isovolumetric relaxation time.

Table 4. Multivariate linear regression analysis with IVRT as the dependent variable in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Standardized beta coefficient p
Insulin dose, U/day 0.374 0.005
Age, years 0.042 0.749
BMI, kg/m2 -0.075 0.542
Diabetes duration, years -0.141 0.282
Glycated Hemoglobin, % 0.047 0.709
Heart rate (bpm) -0.259 0.024
TG/HDL cholesterol ratio 0.205 0.104

BMI: body mass index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; bpm: beat per minute.

In this study on type 1 diabetes outpatients, different findings emerged in relation to the daily insulin dose. Consistently with the sex related insulin sensitivity [7], men showed a higher median value of the daily insulin dose with respect to women. In the higher insulin dose group, BMI, heart rate, glycated hemoglobin, TG/HDL ratio and triglycerides were significantly elevated compared to the low insulin dose group. A significant correlation was found between daily insulin dose and blood pressure, BMI, triglycerides and TG/HDL ratio only in the group with higher insulin dose. While, glycated hemoglobin was significantly correlated to daily insulin dose only in patients in the lower insulin dose group. However, the new and more interesting findings of our study were related to the daily insulin dose and echocardiographic parameters. IVRT, a marker of active diastolic ventricular relaxation [8], was significantly higher in the group with higher insulin dose, while septal thickness; LV mass/BSA; LAVI; LV ejection fraction; septal s’ velocity; E/A ratio; E/e’ ratio; did not differ between the two groups.

The association between insulin dose and cardiometabolic risk factors is consistent with a previous study, that showed similar findings in type 1 diabetes [3]. Of interest is the correlation we observed between insulin dose and glycated hemoglobin that was significant only in patients in the low insulin dose group. Patients in the higher insulin dose have a higher body weight and this means that they are more insulin resistant than patients in the low insulin dose group [9]. These correlations seem to suggest that after a certain threshold of insulin resistance, the relation between insulin dose and glycated hemoglobin reaches a sort of plateau. This relation between insulin dose and glycated hemoglobin is intriguing and may be clinically relevant. It could imply that in our patients with type 1 diabetes we should pursue different approaches, such as a stronger control of the body weight or the use of hypoglycemic agents with different mechanisms of action, in order to ameliorate glucose control instead of increasing insulin dose as suggested in a recent study [10].

At the best of our knowledge this is the first observation of a prolonged IVRT in patients with a higher daily insulin dose compared to patients with a low insulin dose. Interestingly, the association between insulin dose and IVRT persisted in the multivariate model after confounders adjustments. Moreover, IVRT prolongation is the only alteration we observed among other indexes of both systolic and diastolic function and this may be due to the fact that IVRT is an index of LV active diastolic relaxation that precedes LV filling [11].

IVRT occurs when both aortic and mitral valves are closed, thus it is characterized by changes in myocardial elasticity, while ventricular volume remains constant [11, 12]. Impaired heart relaxation involves increased ventricular wall stiffness and abnormal cardiac filling [12]. The explanation of the observed association between insulin dose and IVRT prolongation is not straightforward, nevertheless different mechanisms, not mutually exclusive, may be explored. First of all it should be remarked that patients with a higher insulin dose showed a significantly higher body weight, triglycerides, pulse rate and glycated hemoglobin. These alterations may indicate a higher insulin resistance level, a higher activation of sympathetic activity, higher levels of circulating insulin and higher mean blood glucose levels. All the above alterations may impact on the myocardium structure and function [13].

A first mechanism could be an interference of the calcium handling. Calcium handling disturbances appear to be a key feature of diabetic cardiomyocytes [14], consisting in a prolonged SERCA2 mediated Ca2+ removal from cytosol during diastole [14]. A reduced activity and expression of SERCA2 protein have been described in heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy [15]. Altered calcium handling may directly alter cardiac relaxation [16]. However, the precise role of SERCA2 downregulation in the pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy is not yet well described. Insulin resistance and obesity may affect calcium handling and thus alter IVRT [17, 18]. Moreover, increased sympathetic activity may be the cause of the impairment of IVRT as so nicely shown after renal denervation [19]. Concerning our results, it is interesting to remember that hyperinsulinemia, that may occur in patients with a high insulin dose, may cause sympathetic activation [20]. Furthermore, the results of a recent study that showed improved diastolic function, preserved calcium handling and attenuated myocardial insulin resistance after empagliflozin treatment, are of extreme interest [21]. These results were obtained in a hyperinsulinemic animal model of type 2 diabetes. Treatment with empagliflozin significantly reduced the levels of plasma insulin [21].

A second mechanism could be related to cardiac hypertrophy, one of the first structural changes in the diabetic cardiomyopathy [22]. Insulin resistance, hyperactivity of the sympathetic system and hyperinsulinemia were all linked to cardiac hypertrophy [23]. Altered IVRT may be a precocious alteration in the development of cardiac hypertrophy [24]. Brzyżkiewicz et al, in their study showed a positive correlation between insulin dose and BNP levels [25]. Insulin, when elevated, may promote cardiac hypertrophy [24]. This may be a direct effect of insulin through its own receptor or by binding to the igf-1 receptor, which presents large homology with the insulin receptor [26, 27]. Animal models have shown that chronic hyperinsulinemia may induce cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [28, 29]. In a pressure overload mice model, depletion of insulin, obtained with streptozotocin treatment, attenuates systolic dysfunction [29]. Of note, treatment with insulin improved hyperglycemia during pressure overload on one side, while increased cross-sectional area and decreased relative vascular density on the other, thereby exacerbating cardiac hypoxia leading to cardiomyocytes death and inducing heart failure [29]. Moreover, a positive relationship between cardiac hypertrophy and plasma insulin concentration has been reported [30]. An interesting result of our study is that patients in the higher insulin dose group showed significantly elevated level of triglycerides [31]. It has been reported that in the setting of hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridemia, the myocardium ability to use glucose as an energy source is impaired and a switch to use free fatty acids occurs [32]. This switch may compromise the anti-oxidant capacity of the myocardium thus leading to cardiac dysfunction [32].

And finally a third mechanism could concern the content of glycogen of the myocardium. An excess in cardiac glycogen accumulation has been associated to hypertrophy and dysfunction [33]. The occurrence of cardiac glycogen accumulation in human diabetic patients and animal diabetic models is known from many years [3436]. Recently, it has been shown that a sustained exposure to insulin and high glucose concentration can induce glycogen deposition through a process defined “cardiomyocytes glycophagy” [37]. This phenomenon may be relevant to our study. In fact, it has been shown that a long and sustained exposure to insulin only in a high glucose media leads to glycogen accumulation in cardiomyocytes [37]. This experimental model can recall the situation of the group of patients with higher insulin dose that also showed higher glycated hemoglobin. Thus, the situation of this group can suggest a long exposure to insulin in a high glucose milieu.

Interestingly, a recent study in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis, a cardiomyopathy with iron accumulation, has shown a significant reduction of IVRT after a year course of venesection [38].

The present study has limitations, it is a cross-sectional study thus does not allow to infer on the cause-effect relationship. It is a single center study. Due to the low number of patients on insulin pump we could not differentiate the effect of basal-bolus treatment from insulin pump treatment. We cannot exclude a bias effect of the unmeasured variables. Our study has however various strengths, the number of patients was quite high, moreover they were a homogenous group in fairly good metabolic control and with a very few and not advanced chronic complications.

Conclusions

In this study we report a correlation between insulin dose and impaired active diastolic myocardial relaxation. Future studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms underlying this observation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1407–1418. 10.1056/NEJMoa1608664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Després JP, Lamarche B, Mauriège P, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Moorjani S, et al. Hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 952–7. 10.1056/NEJM199604113341504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Braffett BH, Dagogo-Jack S, Bebu I, Sivitz WI, Larkin M, Kolterman O, et al. Association of Insulin Dose, Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes During 30 Years of Follow-up in the DCCT/EDIC Study. Diabetes Care 2019; 42: 657–664. 10.2337/dc18-1574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buzzetti R, Zampetti S, Pozzilli P. Impact of obesity on the increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020. March 10 10.1111/dom.14022 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Purnell JQ, Hokanson JE, Marcovina SM, Steffes MW, Cleary PA, Brunzell JD. Effect of excessive weight gain with intensive therapy of type 1 diabetes on lipid levels and blood pressure: results from the DCCT. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 140–6. 10.1001/jama.280.2.140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zoppini G, Bergamini C, Trombetta M, Sabbagh L, Dauriz M, Mantovani A, et al. Increased aortic stiffness index in patients with type 1 diabetes without cardiovascular disease compared to controls. J Endocrinol Invest 2019; 42: 1109–1115. 10.1007/s40618-019-01032-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Magkos F, Wang X, Mittendorfer B. Metabolic actions of insulin in men and women. Nutrition 2010. Jul-Aug;26(7–8):686–93. 10.1016/j.nut.2009.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elgeti T, Beling M, Hamm B, Braun J, Sack I. Elasticity-based determination of isovolumetric phases in the human heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 60–68. 10.1186/1532-429X-12-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gregory JM, Cherrington AD, Moore DJ. The Peripheral Peril: Injected Insulin Induces Insulin Insensitivity in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes 2020; 69:37–847 10.2337/dbi19-0026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gordon J, Danne T, Beresford-Hulme L, Bennet H, Tank A, Edmonds C, et al. Adverse Changes in HbA1c, Body Weight and Insulin Use in People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Following Dapagliflozin Discontinuation in the DEPICT Clinical Trial Programme.Diabetes Ther 2020; 11: 1135–1146. 10.1007/s13300-020-00807-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thomas JD, Flachskampf FA, Chen C, Guererro JL, Picard MH, Levine RA, et al. Isovolumic relaxation time varies predictably with its time constant and aortic and left atrial pressures: implications for the noninvasive evaluation of ventricular relaxation. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 1305–13. 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90416-s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Little WC, Warner JG Jr, Rankin KM, Kitzman DW, Cheng CP. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function from the pattern of left ventricular filling. Clin Cardiol 1998; 21: 5–9. 10.1002/clc.4960210102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varma U, Koutsifeli P, Benson VL, Mellor KM, Delbridge LMD. Molecular mechanisms of cardiac pathology in diabetes—Experimental insights. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2018; 1864: 1949–1959. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thapa K, Wu KC, Sarma A, Grund EM, Szeto A, Mendez AJ, et al. Dysregulation of the calcium handling protein, CCDC47, is associated with diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cell Biosci 2018; 8: 45–58. 10.1186/s13578-018-0244-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zainisha V, Naranjan D, Netticadan T. Increased inhibition of SERCA2 by phospholamban in the type I diabetic heart. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 2004; 261: 245–249. 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000028762.97754.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zarain-Herzberg A, García-Rivas G, Estrada-Avilés R. Regulation of SERCA pumps expression in diabetes. Cell Calcium 2014; 56; 302–310. 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wold LE, Dutta K, Mason MM, Ren J, Cala SE, Schwanke ML, et al. Impaired SERCA function contributes to cardiomyocyte dysfunction in insulin resistant rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2005; 39: 297–307. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lima-Leopoldo AP, Leopoldo AS, da Silva DC, do Nascimento AF, de Campos DH, Luvizotto RA, et al. Long-term obesity promotes alterations in diastolic function induced by reduction of phospholamban phosphorylation at serine-16 without affecting calcium handling. J Appl Physiol 2014; 117):669–78. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schirmer SH, Sayed MM, Reil JC, Ukena C, Linz D, Kindermann M, et al. Improvements in left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function following renal denervation: effects beyond blood pressure and heart rate reduction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1916–23. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grassi G, Biffi A, Dell'Oro R, Quarti Trevano F, Seravalle G, Corrao G, et al. Sympathetic neural abnormalities in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Hypertens 2020. May 7 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002431 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hammoudi N, Jeong D, Singh R, Farhat A, Komajda M, Mayoux E, et al. Empagliflozin Improves Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in a Genetic Model of Type 2 Diabetes. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017; 31: 233–246. 10.1007/s10557-017-6734-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eguchi K, Boden-Albala B, Jin Z, Rundek T, Sacco RL, Homma S, et al. Association between diabetes mellitus and left ventricular hypertrophy in a multiethnic population. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1787–91. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iso T, Takahashi K, Yazaki K, Ifuku M, Nii M, Fukae T, et al. In-Depth Insight Into the Mechanisms of Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Using Layer-Specific Strain Analysis. Circ J 2019; 83: 1330–1337. 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jia G, DeMarco VG, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016; 12: 144–53. 10.1038/nrendo.2015.216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brzyżkiewicz H, Konduracka E, Gajos G, Janion M. Incidence of chronic heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with hypertension and isolated mild diastolic dysfunction. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2016; 126: 12–28 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Riehle C, Weatherford ET, Wende AR, Jaishy BP, Seei AW, McCarty NS, et al. Insulin receptor substrates differentially exacerbate insulin-mediated left ventricular remodeling. JCI Insight 2020; 5(6). pii: 134920 10.1172/jci.insight.134920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pires KM, Buffolo M, Schaaf C, David Symons J, Cox J, Abel ED, et al. Activation of IGF-1 receptors and Akt signaling by systemic hyperinsulinemia contributes to cardiac hypertrophy but does not regulate cardiac autophagy in obese diabetic mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2017; 113: 39–50. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Samuelsson AM, Bollano E, Mobini R, Larsson BM, Omerovic E, Fu M, et al. Hyperinsulinemia: effect on cardiac mass/function, angiotensin II receptor expression, and insulin signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H787–96. 10.1152/ajpheart.00974.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shimizu I, Minamino T, Toko H, Okada S, Ikeda H, Yasuda N, et al. Excessive cardiac insulin signaling exacerbates systolic dysfunction induced by pressure overload in rodents. J Clin Invest 2010; 120: 1506–14. 10.1172/JCI40096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karason K, Sjöström L, Wallentin I, Peltonen M. Impact of blood pressure and insulin on the relationship between body fat and left ventricular structure. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1500–5 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00312-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vergès B. Dyslipidemia in Type 1 Diabetes: A Masked Danger. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020. March 2 pii: S1043-2760(20)30026-6. 10.1016/j.tem.2020.01.015 [Epub ahead of print] Review [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guo CA, Guo S. Insulin receptor substrate signaling controls cardiac energy metabolism and heart failure. J Endocrinol 2017; 233:R131–R143. 10.1530/JOE-16-0679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Di Rocco M, Buzzi D, Taro M. Glycogen storage disease type II: clinical overview. Acta Myol 2007; 26: 42–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Warren S. The effect of insulin on pathologic glycogen deposits in diabetes mellitus. Am J Med Sci 1930; 179: 482–488. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nakao M, Matsubara T, Sakamoto N. Effects of diabetes on cardiac glycogen metabolism in rats. Heart Vessels 1993; 8: 171–175 10.1007/BF01744738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Laughlin MR, Petit WA Jr, Shulman RG, Barrett EJ. Measurement of myocardial glycogen synthesis in diabetic and fasted rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 1990; 258: E184–E190. 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.258.1.E184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mellor KM, Varma U, Stapleton DI, Delbridge LM. Cardiomyocyte glycophagy is regulated by insulin and exposure to high extracellular glucose. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2014; 306: H1240–5. 10.1152/ajpheart.00059.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Byrne D, Walsh JP, Daly C, McKiernan S, Norris S, Murphy RT, et al. Improvements in cardiac function detected using echocardiography in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 189: 109–117. 10.1007/s11845-019-02032-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yoshihiro Fukumoto

26 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-20811

Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zoppini,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 10 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yoshihiro Fukumoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.Thank you for including your ethics statement:  "The study was approved by the local ethic committee, and the informed consent was obtained".   

Please amend your current ethics statement to include the full name of the ethics committee/institutional review board(s) that approved your specific study.

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

For additional information about PLOS ONE ethical requirements for human subjects research, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research.

3. You indicated that you had ethical approval for your study. In your Methods section, please ensure you have also stated whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting study to evaluate the association between diastolic myocardial relaxation (IVRT) and insulin-dose. The authors observed positive and significant association between insulin dose and IVRT even after adjusting some clinical factors. I have the several comments to the authors.

1. Why the authors focus on IVRT? Did the authors see any associations between other diastolic parameters and insulin-dose? Some diastolic parameters may be significant after adjusting for confounders.

2. Table 4: In the multivariable model, how did the authors select the variables? AIC or BIC based? Stepwise selection? High-dose group has higher heart rate that affects IVRT. I have a concern about the authors detected the difference of heart rate (HR) between high-dose and low-dose groups. The association between IVRT and insulin-dose significant further adjusted for HR?

Reviewer #2: Thank you for allowing me to review this paper titled “Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes”.

This is a cross-sectional study to assess the association between insulin dose and active diastolic myocardial relaxation.

I recommend the manuscript for publications and have a few comments for revision to share:

The aim is to assess the association between cardiac function insulin dose in “young patients” with type 1 diabetes, but there is no mention of age in the abstract.

In the method section, in addition to age, the median insulin dose (u/kg) needs to be provided.

Introduction. I think it will be helpful as well as important to categorize the evidence on cardiovascular events in type 1 vs. since the data is controversial.

Method: Despite citing reference 4, some background about the setting, date range, and patient population will be helpful.

I suggest being more specific about: “Clinical and laboratory data were collected”.

Results:

Instead of “worse glycemic control,” I suggest using HbA1C “above target”.

Was there any patient on a closed-loop system?

Was there any difference in insulin use based on the type of treatment (MDI vs. pump) even with the current sample size?

Can you please provide some info on why the authors decided to use the median to categorize the insulin usage?

Table 3. Does using the variables included in table 4 in the multivariate regression models lead to bias for “unmeasured” variables? Would it be possible to include Table 1 variables in the model?

Discussion: strength: the authors have described the limitations of the study since this analysis indicates a correlation and not a cause-effect relationship.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244483.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-20811

Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes.

PLOS ONE

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

A) The financial disclosure was not changed. No figures.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

A) Done following the style requirements.

2.Thank you for including your ethics statement: "The study was approved by the local ethic committee, and the informed consent was obtained".

Please amend your current ethics statement to include the full name of the ethics committee/institutional review board(s) that approved your specific study.

A) done

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

A) done

3. You indicated that you had ethical approval for your study. In your Methods section, please ensure you have also stated whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study

A) no minors were included in the study.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

A) Thanks. We report the refer of table 4 in the text.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting study to evaluate the association between diastolic myocardial relaxation (IVRT) and insulin-dose. The authors observed positive and significant association between insulin dose and IVRT even after adjusting some clinical factors. I have the several comments to the authors.

Thanks for your comments.

1. Why the authors focus on IVRT? Did the authors see any associations between other diastolic parameters and insulin-dose? Some diastolic parameters may be significant after adjusting for confounders.

A) No linear correlations were detected between IVRT and diastolic parameters. IVRT was significantly correlated to insulin dose. We add a sentence in the results section. Insulin dose was not an independent predictor of E/A, E/e’ or LAVI.

2. Table 4: In the multivariable model, how did the authors select the variables? AIC or BIC based? Stepwise selection? High-dose group has higher heart rate that affects IVRT. I have a concern about the authors detected the difference of heart rate (HR) between high-dose and low-dose groups. The association between IVRT and insulin-dose significant further adjusted for HR?

A) In the statistical section we specified how the variables were chosen. The model was a forced entry model. Thanks for your important suggestion about heart rate. We included heart rate in the model and the IVRT maintained its significance. We report this new model, that includes heart rate, in the revised manuscript and the results were changed accordingly.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for allowing me to review this paper titled “Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes”.

Thanks for your comments.

This is a cross-sectional study to assess the association between insulin dose and active diastolic myocardial relaxation.

I recommend the manuscript for publications and have a few comments for revision to share:

The aim is to assess the association between cardiac function insulin dose in “young patients” with type 1 diabetes, but there is no mention of age in the abstract.

In the method section, in addition to age, the median insulin dose (u/kg) needs to be provided.

A) We added mean age of patients in the abstract section and mean age plus median insulin dose in the methods section.

Introduction. I think it will be helpful as well as important to categorize the evidence on cardiovascular events in type 1 vs. since the data is controversial.

A) We changed the paragraph of the introduction and added two more references. We hope that the controversy is more evident.

Method: Despite citing reference 4, some background about the setting, date range, and patient population will be helpful.

I suggest being more specific about: “Clinical and laboratory data were collected”.

A) We added more information in the method section.

Results:

Instead of “worse glycemic control,” I suggest using HbA1C “above target”.

A) we change the expression.

Was there any patient on a closed-loop system?

A) 16 subjects were on pump.

Was there any difference in insulin use based on the type of treatment (MDI vs. pump) even with the current sample size?

A) thanks for this question. We compared the insulin dose between patients on pump and MDI, patients on pump had a lower insulin dose. We add the results in the result section.

Can you please provide some info on why the authors decided to use the median to categorize the insulin usage?

A) We use the median value because there is not a recognized cutoff level of insulin dose. In the multivariable model we use insulin dose as a continuous variable.

Table 3. Does using the variables included in table 4 in the multivariate regression models lead to bias for “unmeasured” variables? Would it be possible to include Table 1 variables in the model?

A) We add a sentence in the limitation of the study to acknowledge the possible effect of unmeasured variables.

Discussion: strength: the authors have described the limitations of the study since this analysis indicates a correlation and not a cause-effect relationship.

A) thanks for the comment.

________________________________________

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Answers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Yoshihiro Fukumoto

11 Dec 2020

Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes.

PONE-D-20-20811R1

Dear Dr. Zoppini,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Yoshihiro Fukumoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have responded to the comments. I have no additional comments to the revised version of the manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Yoshihiro Fukumoto

15 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-20811R1

Echocardiographic parameters according to insulin dose in young patients affected by type 1 diabetes.

Dear Dr. Zoppini:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yoshihiro Fukumoto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Answers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES