Skip to main content
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity logoLink to Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
. 2020 Dec 19;2020:6627752. doi: 10.1155/2020/6627752

Skin-Related Properties and Constituents from the Aerial Parts Extract of Persicaria senticosa

Yun-Hyeok Choi 1, Jae Yeon Lee 2, Ji Eun Lee 1, Yeon Woo Jung 1, Wonsik Jeong 1, Seong Su Hong 1, Young-Rak Cho 2, Chun Whan Choi 1,
PMCID: PMC7769672  PMID: 33414895

Abstract

In the course of screening for cosmetic ingredients by measuring antioxidant and antiwrinkle and whitening and anti-inflammatory activities, skin-related activity was tested using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging, elastase inhibition, tyrosinase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay. Several Polygonaseae extracts were found to show potent activity. The results showed that the Persicaria senticosa methanolic extract has the 1,1­diphenyl-2­picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ABTS radical scavenging activities (IC50 61.0 and 17.5 μg/mL). In the elastase inhibition assay and nitric oxide assay, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Persicaria senticosa was 739.7 μg/mL and 71.8 μg/mL. The Persicaria senticosa 70% ethanolic extract partitioned with n-hexane, CH2Cl2, EtOAc, n-BuOH, and aqueous fractions. The purification of EtOAc soluble layer was by column chromatography separation and MPLC analysis of Compounds 1-7. It was identified as loliolide (1), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (2), quercetin-3-O-glucuronide (3), 4-methoxy caftraric acid (4), kaempferol-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (5), quercetin-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (6), and quercetin (7). Structure was elucidated by a combination of 1D and 2D NMR and MS spectrometry as well as comparison with reported literatures. Radical scavenging effect on DPPH, tyrosinase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay on several compounds from Persicaria senticosa was found to show potent activity. The results showed that Compound 7 has the NO assay (IC5029.7 μM). For DPPH, the IC50 of Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 7 was 39.6, 31.2, 37.0, and 22.7 μM. In tyrosinase inhibitory activity, the IC50 of Compound 7 was 14.3 μM.

1. Introduction

Persicaria senticosa is an annual plant in the family Polygonaseae, which is distributed in the whole of Korea. Since early times, this plant has been used as folk medicine with beneficial effects for the treatment of various diseases such as removing the swelling parts of the wound or carbuncles and cellulitis and circulating blood and removing blood stagnation. Recent studies have shown that Persicaria senticosa had anti-inflammatory effects [1]; however, this plant has not been reported as bioactive cosmetic ingredients. And previous phytochemical studies on the flowers, stem, and roots of the genus Polygonum have revealed that various flavonoids and phenolic compounds such as hydroxybenzoic acid, rutin, quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, quercetin-3-O-glucoside, and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside were considered the major active components [2, 3]. These active compounds exhibit diverse pharmacological effects, such as anti-inflammatory, antiulcer, antihypertensive, and anticancer effects [4]. During the screening for cosmetic ingredients by measuring the radical scavenging effect on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ABTS radical scavenging, elastase inhibition, tyrosinase inhibition and nitric oxide assay, several Polygonum extracts were found to show potent activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and General Procedures of Natural Products

Persicaria senticosa was collected from Seo-myeon, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Korea, in 2016 (GPS: N 37° 55′ 30.1, E 127° 37′ 57.0, altitude: 434 m). Voucher specimens (G071) were authenticated by Dr. Chun Whan Choi. Persicaria senticosa were deposited at the herbarium of Biocenter, Gyeonggido Business & Science Accelerator, Suwon, South Korea (Fig. S3). The 99.9% methanol extract of thirty-four Polygonum was obtained from the Korea Plant Extract Bank at the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Daejeon, Korea). 1H and 13C NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Ascend 700 MHz spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS). LC-ESI-MS was obtained on a Triple TOF 5600+ instrument (AB SCIX, USA) and HRESI-MS on a LTQ Orbitrap XL instrument (Thermo, USA). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was conducted on Silica gel 60 F254 (Merck, Germany) and Silica gel 60 RP-18 F254S (Merck, Germany) plates. Column chromatography(CC) was performed using Silica gel 60 (70~230 mesh, Merck, Germany), ODS-A (12 nm S-7 μm, YMC GEL, Japan), and preparative HPLC was performed on LC-8A (Shimadzu, Japan).

2.2. NO Assay

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well) and were treated with sample for 1 h prior to LPS (1 μg/mL) stimulation for 24 h. The negative control was treated with serum-free media. The amount of nitrite, a stable metabolite of NO, was measured by using Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide and 0.1% naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride in 2.5% phosphoric acid). Absorbance was subsequently measured at 540 nm using an ELISA reader. The quantity of nitrite was determined from a standard curve for sodium nitrite [57].

2.3. Cell Cytotoxicity Assay

RAW 264.7 cells were plated at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in 96-well plates. Cells were treated with samples for 1 h prior to LPS (1 μg/mL) stimulation for 24 h. MTT (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well and incubated for 2 hr. The medium was removed from the wells by aspiration, DMSO was added to each well, and the plate was shaken. The absorbance of each well was measured at a wavelength of 540 nm using an ELISA reader. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.

2.4. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

DPPH radical scavenging activity was measured by using the method described by Blois [8] and Ozgen et al. [9]. DPPH solution dissolved in methanol was added to the sample, which was diluted to the required concentration, and the reaction was carried out at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 517 nm using an ELISA reader. The antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) was used as a positive control, and the IC50 value of the sample was determined.

2.5. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

ABTS radical scavenging activity was measured by using a previously described method [10, 11]. ABTS+ was formed by mixing 7 mM ABTS solution and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) solution with ABTS: K2S2O8 (2 : 1 ratio) for 12–16 h to form a cation (ABTS+). The absorbance was measured at 734 nm using an ELISA reader. BHA, an antioxidant, was used as the positive control.

2.6. Tyrosinase Inhibition Assay

Tyrosinase inhibitory activity was measured by using the method described by Yagi et al. [12]. The reaction was carried out in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 1.5 mM L-tyrosine and 1250 units/mL mushroom tyrosinase. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The test samples were assayed for tyrosinase inhibition by measuring its effect on tyrosinase activity using SpectraMax 190PC microplate ELISA reader at 490 nm. Arbutin and kojic acid were used as a positive control, and the IC50 value of the sample was determined.

2.7. Elastase Inhibition Assay

The reaction was carried out in 0.5 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.5) containing 1 mg/mL N-succinyl-(Ala)3-p-nitroanilide and 0.6 unit/mL elastase. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25°C for 10 min. The test samples were assayed for elastase inhibition by measuring its effect on elastase activity using an ELISA reader at 405 nm. Ursolic acid was used as a positive control, and the IC50 value of the sample was determined [13].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by PRIZM5 software (GraphPad, CA, USA), and data are presented as mean ± SD. One-tailed Student's t-test was used for analyzing the significance of difference between groups, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Skin-Related Properties of Plants Extracts in the Family Polygonaseae

Radical scavenging effect on DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging, elastase inhibition, tyrosinase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay on several Polygonum extracts were found to show potent activity. The results showed that the Persicaria japonica and Rumex longifolius has the NO assay (IC50 45.3 and under 25.0 μg/mL). For DPPH, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Polygonum ciliinerve, Polygonum alpinum, and Persicaria chinensis was 36.9, 15.4, and 19.2 μg/mL, respectively. In the ABTS radical scavenging activity, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Polygonum cuspidate and Polygonum alpinum was 5.2 and 5.3 μg/mL, respectively. In tyrosinase inhibitory activity, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Polygonum sachalinens root and Polygonum cuspidata was 289.0 and 483.9 μg/mL, respectively. In the elastase inhibition assay, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Polygonum sachalinense, Polygonum cuspidatum, Persicaria hydropiper, Persicaria sieboldi, Polygonum orientale, Persicaria lapathifolia, Persicaria dissitiflora, Rumex acetosella, Rumex crispus, Polygonum alpinum, Persicaria longiseta, Persicaria chinensis, Persicaria japonica, Persicaria viscofera, Persicaria conspicua, Rheum palmatum, and Persicaria lapathifolia was under 100 μg/mL (Table 1).

Table 1.

Skin-related properties of plants extracts in the family Polygonaseae.

No. Name Parts Anti-inflammatory Antioxidant Whitening Anti-wrinkle
NO (μg/mL) MTT (μg/mL) DPPH (μg/mL) ABTS (μg/mL) Tyrosinase assay (μg/mL) Elastase assay (μg/mL)
1 Polygonum sachalinense Fruits 71.1 ± 6.9 >100 98.5 ± 2.4 6.0 ± 0.1 308.8 ± 9.2 <100
Root >100 >100 54.3 ± 1.7 9.3 ± 0.2 289.0 ± 6.1 <100
2 Rumex japonicus Whole plants >100 >100 >100 31.1 ± 0.3 >1000 400.6 ± 4.3
3 Polygonum ciliinerve Whole plants >100 >100 36.9 ± 1.2 6.6 ± 0.1 >1000 216.0 ± 5.0
4 Polygonum manshuriense Whole plants >100 >100 86.3 ± 1.5 23.5 ± 0.1 >1000 564.0 ± 9.3
5 Polygonum cuspidatum Whole plants >100 >100 43.3 ± 0.9 6.8 ± 0.0 >1000 <100
6 Persicaria hydropiper Whole plants 83.2 ± 3.6 >100 35.1 ± 1.1 10.5 ± 0.3 >1000 <100
7 Polygonum senticosum Whole plants >100 >100 91.7 ± 0.3 25.7 ± 0.2 >1000 263.9 ± 3.8
Aerial parts 71.8 ± 3.7 >100 61.0 ± 0.6 17.5 ± 0.1 >1000 739.7 ± 6.5
8 Persicaria sieboldi Whole plants >100 >100 >100 26.8 ± 0.2 >1000 <100
9 Polygonum orientale Fruits 54.5 ± 2.3 >100 50.6 ± 3.3 14.4 ± 0.1 445.4 ± 5.3 <100
Whole plants 73.5 ± 5.2 >100 30.8 ± 0.2 8.8 ± 0.1 391.7 ± 2.3 <100
10 Polygonum cuspidata Seed 64.8 ± 1.9 >100 24.0 ± 0.7 5.2 ± 0.1 483.9 ± 4.2 189.5 ± 7.3
11 Persicaria tinctoria Flora >100 >100 44.8 ± 0.4 11.6 ± 0.1 >1000 129.5 ± 7.5
12 Rumex conglomeratus Aerial parts >100 >100 48.2 ± 1.6 18.9 ± 0.2 >1000 536.9 ± 2.9
Root >100 >100 37.2 ± 0.3 11.6 ± 0.1 >1000 348.0 ± 7.3
13 Persicaria lapathifolia Whole plants >100 >100 29.3 ± 0.5 10.4 ± 0.1 >1000 <100
14 Persicaria dissitiflora Whole plants >100 >100 30.0 ± 1.0 10.8 ± 0.1 411.2 ± 4.8 <100
15 Persicaria thunbergii Aerial parts 65.7 ± 12.3 >100 >100 49.4 ± 0.2 >1000 >1000
Whole plants 60.3 ± 1.3 >100 >100 40.2 ± 0.2 >1000 >1000
16 Polygonum aviculare Whole plants 74.5 ± 4.2 >100 22.6 ± 0.3 9.3 ± 0.1 >1000 133.3 ± 3.2
17 Polygonum emaginatum Whole plants 79.3 ± 1.3 >100 >100 20.4 ± 0.1 >1000 832.9 ± 9.8
18 Rumex obtusifolius Aerial parts >100 >100 >100 59.5 ± 0.8 >1000 >1000
Root >100 >100 42.0 ± 0.1 14.1 ± 0.1 >1000 348.8 ± 4.7
19 Rumex acetosella Whole plants >100 >100 34.2 ± 0.5 9.4 ± 0.2 733.1 ± 16.5 <100
Whole plants >100 >100 45.0 ± 0.5 11.9 ± 0.1 876.2 ± 7.9 <100
20 Rumex crispus Aerial parts 90.4 ± 4.3 >100 30.5 ± 0.3 10.8 ± 0.2 >1000 <100
Root >100 >100 71.1 ± 0.1 22.7 ± 0.4 >1000 438.1 ± 9.8
Whole plants >100 >100 39.1 ± 1.1 15.4 ± 0.4 >1000 318.1 ± 7.6
21 Persicaria nepalensis Whole plants 90.8 ± 3.1 >100 50.3 ± 0.2 17.2 ± 0.1 >1000 >1000
22 Polygonum alpinum Aerial parts 83.3 ± 6.8 >100 28.3 ± 0.3 9.8 ± 0.1 >1000 <100
Aerial parts 71.6 ± 7.9 >100 15.4 ± 0.5 5.3 ± 0.1 564.8 ± 4.7 <100
Whole plants 72.1 ± 5.3 >100 22.2 ± 0.1 9.0 ± 0.2 >1000 <100
23 Persicaria longiseta Whole plants >100 >100 44.9 ± 0.4 12.2 ± 0.1 >1000 <100
24 Persicaria chinensis Whole plants 72.1 ± 9.3 >100 19.2 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 0.0 726.4 ± 6.9 <100
25 Persicaria japonica Whole plants 45.3 ± 5.5 >100 24.4 ± 0.7 9.4 ± 0.1 431.1 ± 7.8 <100
Leaf, stem >100 >100 26.4 ± 1.0 10.7 ± 0.3 >1000 <100
26 Persicaria viscofera Whole plants 86.5 ± 2.7 >100 39.1 ± 0.6 11.4 ± 0.0 694.9 ± 6.8 <100
27 Rumex longifolius Aerial parts <25 >100 >100 78.2 ± 0.2 >1000 >1000
Aerial parts 82.4 ± 5.8 >100 >100 82.0 ± 1.1 >1000 >1000
28 Persicaria conspicua Whole plants >100 >100 48.1 ± 0.6 16.8 ± 0.2 >1000 <100
29 Persicaria sieboldi Whole plants >100 >100 80.3 ± 0.8 21.9 ± 0.4 >1000 406.2 ± 7.4
30 Persicaria perfoliata Aerial parts 52.2 ± 6.4 >100 68.8 ± 0.5 17.4 ± 0.4 >1000 352.1 ± 3.2
Whole plants >100 >100 50.4 ± 2.4 15.4 ± 0.1 >1000 164.0 ± 4.1
31 Rheum palmatum Whole plants 71.8 ± 6.8 >100 27.3 ± 0.8 8.6 ± 0.2 >1000 <100
32 Rumex acetosa Whole plants >100 >100 >100 59.8 ± 1.2 >1000 >1000
33 Polygonum multiflorum Whole plants >100 >100 51.7 ± 0.9 16.1 ± 0.1 >1000 647.4 ± 7.4
34 Persicaria lapathifolia Whole plants 86.9 ± 5.2 >100 24.5 ± 0.8 11.1 ± 0.1 >1000 <100
P.C. L-NMMA 36.3 ± 6.1 μM L-NMMA >100 μM BHA 15.6 ± 0.2 BHA 2.9 ± 0.1 Arbutin 135.0 ± 19.9 Ursolic acid 53.2 ± 6.1

3.2. Skin-Related Properties of Persicaria senticosa Fractions

Radical scavenging effect on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl(DPPH), ABTS radical scavenging, elastase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay on several Persicaria senticosa fractions was found to show potent activity. The results showed that the CH2Cl2 and EtOAc fractions have the NO assay (under 25 and 44.64 μg/mL, respectively). The DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities of EtOAc fractions were 13.7 and 5.0 μg/mL. In the elastase inhibition assay, the IC50 of n-hexane and CH2Cl2 fractions was under 100 μg/mL (Table 2).

Table 2.

Skin-related properties of Persicaria senticosa fractions.

Fractions Anti-inflammatory Antioxidant Antiwrinkle
NO (μg/mL) MTT (μg/mL) DPPH (μg/mL) ABTS (μg/mL) Elastase assay
Persicaria senticosum Hx fr. 57.72 ± 5.54 >100 43.48 ± 1.20 22.71 ± 0.46 <100
Persicaria senticosum CH2Cl2 fr. <25 >100 20.19 ± 0.39 7.88 ± 0.24 <100
Persicaria senticosum EtOAc fr. 44.64 ± 7.86 >100 13.69 ± 0.74 4.97 ± 0.09 713.56 ± 36.44
Persicaria senticosum BuOH fr. 32.66 ± 3.95 >100 33.87 ± 1.36 11.51 ± 0.25 123.55 ± 87.76
Persicaria senticosum H2O fr. >100 >100 >100 >100 >1000
P. C. L-NMMA 37.63 ± 6.10 μM L-NMMA >100 μM BHA 14.58 ± 0.06 BHA 4.03 ± 0.05 Ursolic acid 38.97 ± 7.12

3.3. Isolation and Determination of Compounds from Persicaria senticosa Extract

Persicaria senticosa aerial parts (1.4 kg), dried in the shade and powdered, were added to 40 L of 70% ethanol (HPLC grade) and two times at room temperature (each time for 2 days) and were concentrated in vacuum at 40°C to yield 180.4 g of extracts. The extracts were suspended in distilled water and then partitioned with n-hexane (4.0 L×3), CH2Cl2 (4.0 L × 3), EtOAc (4.0 L × 3), and n-butanol (4.0 L × 3) to give n-hexane (11.7 g), CH2Cl2 (7.4 g), EtOAc (21.7 g), n-butanol (22.5 g), and water-soluble fractions (110.1 g), (Scheme 1). The fraction of EtOAc (21.7 g) was separated by MPLC that used gradient mixtures as eluents (F001-003). Compounds 1 (3.2 mg) and 5 (3.9 mg) were isolated from F002 that used by prep-HPLC. The fraction F001 was separated by MPLC that used gradient mixtures as eluents (F011-F018). Compound 6 (1.5 mg) was isolated from F016 that was used by preparative HPLC. Compound 7 (2.7 mg) was isolated from F017 that was used by preparative HPLC. F012 was separated by using MPLC which used gradient mixtures as eluents (F121-F124). Compound 4 (10.8 mg) was isolated from F124 that used by preparative HPLC. In addition, F014 was separated by preparative HPLC using gradient mixtures as eluents (F141-F143). Compound 3 (2.3 mg) was isolated from F141 using preparative HPLC. Compound 2 (4.8 mg) was isolated from F142 using semipreparative HPLC. The purification of the EtOAc soluble layer was performed by column chromatography separation and MPLC analysis to Compounds 1-7. It was identified as loliolide (1) [14], quercetin-3-O-glucoside (2) [15], quercetin-3-O-glucuronide (3) [16], 4-methoxy caftraric acid (4) [17], kaempferol-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (5) [18], quercetin-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (6) [19, 20], and quercetin (7) [21]. Structure was elucidated by a combination of 1D and 2D NMR and MS spectrometry as well as comparison with reported literatures (Figure 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Isolation of the Compounds 17 from aerial parts of Persicaria senticosa.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of the Compounds 17 from aerial parts of Persicaria senticosa.

3.4. Skin-Related Properties of Compounds from Persicaria senticosa

Radical scavenging effect on DPPH, tyrosinase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay on several compounds from Persicaria senticosa was found to show potent activity (Fig. S4–7). The results showed that Compound 7 has the NO assay (IC50 29.7 μg/mL). For DPPH, the IC50 of Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 7 was 39.6, 31.2, 37.0, and 22.7 μg/mL, respectively. In tyrosinase inhibitory activity, the IC50 of Compound 7 was 14.3 μg/mL (Table 3).

Table 3.

Skin-related properties of compounds from Persicaria senticosa.

Sample NO assay IC50 (μM) MTT assay IC50 (μM) DPPH assay IC50 (μM) Elastase inhibition assay IC50 (μM) Tyrosinase inhibition assay IC50 (μM)
Comp. 1 >100 >100 >1000 >1000 >100
Comp. 2 >100 >100 39.56 ± 4.10 >1000 >100
Comp. 3 >100 >100 31.15 ± 0.47 >1000 >100
Comp. 4 >100  84.56 ± 9.85 >1000 >1000 >100
Comp. 5 >100 >100 36.99 ± 0.16 >1000 >100
Comp. 6 >100 >100 >1000 >1000 >100
Comp. 7 29.69 ± 7.07 >100 22.71 ± 0.53 >1000 14.31 ± 3.93
P. C. L-NMMA 14.56 ± 3.46 L-NMMA >100 BHA 271.70 ± 19.45 Ursolic acid 86.3 ± 9.90 Kojic acid 11.38 ± 4.16

4. Conclusions

Persicaria senticosa is an annual plant in the family Polygonaseae which is distributed in whole Korea. Since early times, this plant has been used as folk medicine with beneficial effects for the treatment of various diseases. This study evaluated skin-related properties and constituents from the aerial part extract of Persicaria senticosa and thirty-four Polygonaseae plants. In the course of screening for cosmetic ingredients by measuring the radical scavenging effect on DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging, antiwrinkle was evaluated using elastase inhibition, whitening was studied by tyrosinase inhibition, and anti-inflammatory was tested on nitric oxide assay. Several Polygonum extracts were found to show potent activity. The results showed that the Persicaria senticosa methanolic extract has the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities (IC50 61.0 and 17.5 μg/mL). In the elastase inhibition assay and nitric oxide assay, the IC50 of methanolic extract of Persicaria senticosa was 241.5 μg/mL and 71.8 μg/mL, respectively. The Persicaria senticosa 70% ethanolic extract was partitioned with n-hexane, CH2Cl2, EtOAc, n-BuOH, and aqueous fractions.

EtOAc soluble fraction showed a potent skin-related activity (Figure 2 and Table 3). These results suggested that active components in Persicaria senticosa responsible for the skin-related activity were concentrated in the EtOAc soluble fraction of Persicaria senticosa (Scheme 1). On the other hand, the n-hexane, dichloromethane soluble fraction, and the BuOH soluble fraction derived from the extract of Persicaria senticosa showed equipotent activity on nitric oxide assay, DPPH, and ABTS radical scavenging activity, whereas remaining water fraction demonstrated poor inhibitory effects (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Skin-related activity of EtOAc soluble fraction of Persicaria senticosa. A ::(a) nNitric oxide assay, . B ::(b) MTT assay, . C ::(c) DPPH radical scavenging, . D ::(d) ABTS radical scavenging, . E ::(e) eElastase inhibition activity.

Thus, bioassay-guided purification of three active fractions, i.e., the EtOAc soluble fraction of Persicaria senticosa was conducted to purify the active principles responsible for the skin-related activity followed by the process described in Scheme 1, respectively.

The purification of the EtOAc soluble layer from Persicaria senticosa 70% ethanolic extract was performed by column chromatography separation and MPLC analysis to Compounds 1-7. It was identified as loliolide (1), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (2), quercetin-3-O-glucuronide (3), 4-methoxy caftraric acid (4), kaempferol-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (5), quercetin-3-(6-methylglucuronide) (6), and quercetin (7). Structure was elucidated by a combination of 1D and 2D NMR and MS spectrometry as well as comparison with reported literatures (Fig. S2). Radical scavenging effect on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl(DPPH), tyrosinase inhibition, and nitric oxide assay on several compounds from Persicaria senticosa was found to show potent activity. The results showed that Compound 7 has the NO assay (IC50 29.7 μM). For DPPH, the IC50 of Compounds 2, 3, 5, and 7 was 39.4, 32.1, 37.0, and 22.7 μM, respectively. In tyrosinase inhibitory activity, the IC50 of Compound 7 was 14.3 μM. As shown in Figure 3, Compounds 2 and 5 are the main compounds in the EtOAc soluble fraction of Persicaria senticosa(Fig. S1). And Compounds 2 and 5 showed excellent antioxidant activity(Figure 4), which is consistent with previous studies [18, 22].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HPLC profile of EtOAc fraction of Persicaria senticosa.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

DPPH radical scavenging activity of compounds 2 and 5 from EtOAc soluble fraction of Persicaria senticosa.

This present study demonstrated that Persicaria senticosa and Polygonaseae contain chemical compounds with good skin-related activities and could be interesting as a novel source of bioactive agents for cosmetic industries.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ013183)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the Supplemental Information File.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Attached is the NMR as supplementary data for this research work (Supplementary Materials). Figure S1: specimen photo of Persicaria senticosum. Figure S2: DPPH radical scavenging activity assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S3: tyrosinase inhibition assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S4: NO assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S5: cell cytotoxicity assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S6: spectral data of isolated compounds Persicaria senticosum (Compounds 1–7). Figure S7: high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) condition and profile of EtOAc fraction of Persicaria senticosum.

References

  • 1.Jung S. M., Park J. R., Ra M. J., Kim Y. H., Yu J. H., Lee Y. J. Persicaria senticosa Ameliorates Imiquimod-induced Psoriasis-like Skin Lesions in Mice via Suppression of IL-6/STAT3 Expression and Proliferation of Keratinocytes. Natural Product Sciences. 2020;26(2):136–143. doi: 10.20307/nps.2020.26.2.136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sano S., Chan K. S., Carbajal S., et al. Stat3 links activated keratinocytes and immunocytes required for development of psoriasis in a novel transgenic mouse model. Nature Medicine. 2005;11(1):43–49. doi: 10.1038/nm1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim S. Y., Won D. H., Park S. N. Antibacterial activity and component analysis of Persicaria perfoliata extracts. The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;38:278–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El-Hawary S. A., Sokkar N. M., Ali Z. Y., Yehia M. M. A profile of bioactive compounds of Rumex vesicarius L. Food Science. 2011;76(8):C1195–C1202. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kawamata H., Ochiai H., Mantani N., Terasawa K. Enhanced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase by Juzen-taiho-to in LPSactivated RAW 264.7 cells, a murine macrophage cell line. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2000;28(2):217–226. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X0000026X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Callender V. D., St Surin-Lord S., Davis E. C., Maclin M. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: etiologic and therapeutic considerations. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2011;12(2):87–99. doi: 10.2165/11536930-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Panich U., Tangsupa-a-nan V., Onkoksoong T., et al. Inhibition of UVA-mediated melanogenesis by ascorbic acid through modulation of antioxidant defense and nitric oxide system. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2011;34(5):811–820. doi: 10.1007/s12272-011-0515-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blois M. S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 1958;181(4617):1199–1200. doi: 10.1038/1811199a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ozgen U., Mavi A., Terzi Z., Yildirim A., Coşkun M., Houghton P. J. Antioxidant Properties of Some Medicinal Lamiaceae (Labiatae) Species. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2006;44(2):107–112. doi: 10.1080/13880200600592061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miller N. J., Rice-Evans C., Davies M. J., Gopinathan V., Milner A. A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clinical Science. 1993;84(4):407–412. doi: 10.1042/cs0840407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dudonné S.´., Vitrac X., Coutière P., Woillez M., Mérillon J. M. Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57(5):1768–1774. doi: 10.1021/jf803011r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yagi A., Kanbara T., Morinobu N. Inhibition of mushroom-tyrosinase by Aloe Extract. Planta Medica. 1987;53(6):515–517. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-962798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pedrosa T. D., Barros A. O., Nogueira J. R., et al. Anti-wrinkle and anti-whitening effects of jucá (Libidibia ferrea Mart.) extracts. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2016;308(9):643–654. doi: 10.1007/s00403-016-1685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hong Y. H., Wang S. C., Hsu C., Lin B. F., Kuo Y. H., Huang C. J. Phytoestrogenic compounds in alfalfa sprout (Medicago sativa) beyond coumestrol. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011;59(1):131–137. doi: 10.1021/jf102997p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gao D. F., Xu M., Yang C. R., Xu M., Zhang Y. J. Phenolic antioxidants from the leaves of Camellia pachyandra Hu. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58(15):8820–8824. doi: 10.1021/jf101490r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin H. Y., Kuo Y. H., Lin Y. L., Chiang W. Antioxidative effect and active components from leaves of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57(15):6623–6629. doi: 10.1021/jf900950z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Opitz S., Schnitzler J. P., Hause B., Schneider B. Histochemical analysis of phenylphenalenone-related compounds in Xiphidium caeruleum (haemodoraceae) Planta. 2003;216:881–889. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0941-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jung H. A., Kim J. E., Chung H. Y., Choi J. S. Antioxidant principles of Nelumbo nucifera stamens. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2003;26(4):279–285. doi: 10.1007/BF02976956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He Z., Lian W., Liu J., et al. Isolation, structural characterization and neuraminidase inhibitory activities of polyphenolic constituents from Flos caryophylli. Phytochemistry Letters. 2017;19:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2016.12.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan X. T., Ding Y., Li W., et al. Two new phenolic compounds from Artemisia iwayomogi. Helvetica Chimica Acta. 2014;97(2):283–289. doi: 10.1002/hlca.201300170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Min B. S., Cuong T. D., Lee J. S., Shin B. S., Woo M. H., Hung T. M. Cholinesterase inhibitors from Cleistocalyx operculatus buds. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2010;33(10):1665–1670. doi: 10.1007/s12272-010-1016-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dai X., Huang Q., Zhou B., Gong Z., Liu Z., Shi S. Preparative isolation and purification of seven main antioxidants from Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (Du-zhong) leaves using HSCCC guided by DPPH-HPLC experiment. Food Chemistry. 2013;139(1-4):563–570. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Attached is the NMR as supplementary data for this research work (Supplementary Materials). Figure S1: specimen photo of Persicaria senticosum. Figure S2: DPPH radical scavenging activity assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S3: tyrosinase inhibition assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S4: NO assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S5: cell cytotoxicity assay data of isolated compounds from Persicaria senticosum. Figure S6: spectral data of isolated compounds Persicaria senticosum (Compounds 1–7). Figure S7: high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) condition and profile of EtOAc fraction of Persicaria senticosum.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the Supplemental Information File.


Articles from Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES