Corrigendum to “An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions” [Forensic Sci. Int. Synergy 2 (2020) 107–109]

The authors regret that there is an error on p.108 of their published article:

“For example, Kukucka and Kassin (2014) do not report the age, gender and/or any other demographic information about their participants; except that they were undergraduate students in psychology."

The authors stated that Kukucka and Kassin in their work did not report demographic information about their participants beyond their status as psychology undergraduate students. This was an error and the authors wish to make clear that they were referring to information in the Pilot Study only and not Study 1 or Study 2. To clarify, Kukucka and Kassin did report demographic information in Study 1 and Study 2.

The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.