Abstract
A 69-year-old male patient who had a history of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) post right hepatectomy presented a year later with iron-deficiency anemia. His anemia work-up included upper endoscopy that revealed multiple gastric polyp a biopsy from the largest demonstrated metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. His magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a gastric "polyp" without evidence of local HCC recurrence within the liver. His subsequent dual imaging with Choline/fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) confirmed the gastric metastases and in addition revealed other sites of unexpected metastatic disease in the right adrenal and the bone that was asymptomatic.
Patient was started on sorafenib and currently he is alive one-and-half-year postdetection of his metastatic disease under palliative care.
This case showed that the possibility of gastric metastases should be kept in mind when confronted with anemia in HCC patient and also highlight the complementary role of molecular imaging modality along with MRI in the metastatic work-up for hepatocellular carcinoma postcurative resection.
Keywords: Gastric wall metastases, HCC, 18F-Choline
Introduction
Extrahepatic metastases (EHM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are now observed frequently because of improved diagnostic methods and prolonged survivals.
The most frequent metastatic sites of HCC are lungs, bone, lymph nodes, and adrenal glands. However, gastrointestinal tract involvement is a rare entity with a poor prognosis that should be kept in mind particularly in patient with unexplained anemia; it can occur via hematogenous route or direct invasion. Here we report a case with HCC after liver resection who presented with unexplained anemia and was found to have gastric metastases.
Molecular imaging modality namely 18F-Choline/PET CT played a major role along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and upper endoscopy to properly evaluate the patient and assess the burden of his recurrent disease.
Case presentation
A 69-year-old male patient who presented with large liver mass involving segment VIII that was consistent with HCC and appeared to be a non-AFP producing HCC. According to Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer Staging system (BCLC Staging of Liver Cancer) he fits the intermediate stage (stage B) at presentation since he has large tumor more than 3 cm, good liver function (Child-Pugh classification: A) with good performance status (ECOG score is 0).
Right hepatectomy was performed; the pathological examination revealed a 10 cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma; the surrounding liver parenchyma revealed mild steatosis.
One year later during the surveillance follow-up post his liver resection, he was noted to have generalized weakness and anemia. His follow-up MRI showed a gastric "polyp" without evidence of local HCC recurrence within the liver (Fig. 1). Subsequently; he underwent upper endoscopy that revealed multiple gastric polyps in the body of the stomach; 2.5 cm polyp in the greater curvature was removed and sent for histopathology. Another gastric body polyp measuring 3 cm was found with evidence of bleeding. Epinephrine injected (2 mL) and bleeding stopped.
Fig. 1.
Enhancing gastric polyp arising from the greater curvature of the stomach (red arrow) seen in the T1 weighted MRI early arterial image (A) that shows intense choline uptake with minimal FDG uptake on fused 18F Choline PET-CT (B) and 18F FDG PET-CT (C).
The biopsy demonstrated metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. His alphafetoprotien (AFP) at that time was 3.3 µg/L, which is normal, his lab was only remarkable for iron-deficiency anemia.
Further staging work-up included dual imaging with 18F-Choline/fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. In addition to the gastric metastasis; he had PET findings of a right adrenal metastasis, as well as bone metastases involving multiple sites at L4-L5, and the right parietooccipital region of the skull (Fig. 2). His bone metastases were asymptomatic. Patient was started on sorafenib and currently he is alive one–and-half-year postdetection of his metastatic disease under palliative care.
Fig. 2.
Right adrenal metastases, L-2, and right parieto-occipital lytic bone metastases (red arrows) in panel A, B, and C respectively; top raw represents CT, middle raw represents fused 18F Choline PET-CT and the bottom raw represents fused 18F FDG PET-CT.
Discussion
HCC is the most prevalent primary malignancy of the liver account for 85%-90% of primary liver cancer that has a poor prognosis owing to its frequent intrahepatic recurrence and EHM [1].
However, with newer treatment modalities including liver transplant, together with advances in imaging techniques, survival from hepatocellular carcinoma have improved, patients might achieve long term survival that is substantially longer than before [2].
Furthermore; EHM of HCC are now observed more frequently because of improved diagnostic methods and prolonged survival.
Because of better control of the primary tumor, the significance of distant metastases to patient management has increased.
Approximately, 13.5%-36.7% patients with HCC will develop EHM particularly in advanced stage disease according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system; lung is the most common site of metastasis in HCC, followed by lymph nodes, bones and the adrenal glands [3,4].
Gastric metastasis from HCC is extremely rare; in a series of 8267 patients with HCC, only 7 cases (0.08%) were found to have gastric metastases [5]. Additionally, among 31 autopsied cases of HCC, gastric metastasis was found in only one case [6].
Metastases are usually concurrent with intrahepatic lesions, but can occur alone in the absence of intrahepatic recurrence. It usually occurs by the direct invasion of a contiguous neoplasm, or by hematogenous spread [7].
Portal-systemic circulation and the retrograde portal vein are mainly the possible routes of hematogenous metastasis to the stomach. Portal vein tumor thrombi lead to releasing cancer cells in the portal vein draining retrograde into the gastric venous system and then becoming implanted into the intramural vein of the stomach [8,9]. In our case, the patient did not have portal vein tumor thrombus; however, he had a sizable tumor measuring 10 cm that is alone considered a risk factor for recurrence or distant hematogenous metastases.
The proper evaluation and detection of intrahepatic spread, involvement of vascular structures and diagnosis of EHM is crucial to optimize potential therapy for patients.
CT/MRI are not recommended as the primary imaging modality for surveillance; except in patients whom ultrasound is limited by body habitus, hepatic steatosis, or severe parenchymal heterogeneity from advanced cirrhosis.
Our patient had steatosis which limit the sensitivity of US therefore MRI of the abdomen with AFP were initially requested when he presented with anemia to exclude recurrent disease.
AFP alone is not recommended because of its poor sensitivity and specificity [10]. The combination of AFP plus US/MRI increase the detection rate compared with US/MRI/CT alone [10]; that was observed in our patient whom AFP was normal at the time of initial recurrence.
His subsequent dual imaging with Choline/FDG PET/CT confirmed the gastric metastases and in addition revealed other sites of unexpected metastatic disease in the right adrenal and the bone.
Role of conventional and molecular imaging in HCC
Conventional CT/MRI
CT and MRI remain the main stay of oncologic imaging of the liver.
In the presence of chronic liver disease, HCCs can be diagnosed on dynamic contrast CT/MR if they display characteristic features like arterial enhancement and portal venous washout regardless of the size [11]. MRI has been shown to be more sensitive than CT scan in a per lesion comparison (80% vs 68%) [12].
Molecular imaging
Molecular imaging particularly with the hybrid imaging technique that combines positron emission tomography and CT/MRI is playing evolving and growing rules in oncological imaging. The forefront and the most widely used radiotracer for PET imaging is FDG. It reflects intracellular glucose metabolism which is usually increased in malignant tissue, known as Warburg effect.
18F-FDG is administered intravenously and is then transported into cells by glucose transporter proteins in a fashion similar to that for unlabeled D-glucose. Subsequently, 18F-FDG is then phosphorylated by hexokinase to form 18F-FDG-6-phosphate. The cell membrane is impermeable to both glucose 6-phosphate and FDG-6-phosphate. However, the latter cannot be further degraded via the glycolysis pathway nor can it easily undergo dephosphorylating by glucose-6-phosphatase. Ultimately, 18F-FDG-6-phosphate remains trapped within the cell and the more 18F-FDG within the cells the more increased uptake within the tumor itself [13].
Low level of glucose-transporter-1 and high glucose-6-phosphatase expression within HCC cells are causing reduced FDG uptake within HCC lesions [14].
The overall detection rate for HCC is ranging from 50% to 65% [15,16]. However; with regard to detection of metastases from HCC, FDG perform reasonably well with 77% sensitivity and 98% sensitivity [17].
Several other radiotracers have been evaluated in HCC to overcome the limitations of FDG PET/CT such 11C-acetate and 11C/18F-Choline.
11C-Acetate
Acetate is a precursor of Acetyl-CoA needed for the synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol to build up the cell membrane [18]. Unlike 18F-FDG PET, the detection rate of well-differentiated type of HCC is high; several authors evaluated the role of dual-tracer PET with 18F-FDG/11C-Acetate in patients with HCC lesions. 11C-Acetated achieved a sensitivity of 70%-80% that can easily exceed 80% to approach nighties when the dual imaging technique (FDG/Acetate) is being performed [19], [20], [21].
The main limitation of 11C-Acetate is represented by the ultra-short half-life of C-11 radionuclide of about 20 minutes so that the use of 11C-Acetate is possible only in PET centers with an on-site cyclotron. To overcome these limitations, a derivative of acetate labeled with 18F-fluorine, which has a significantly longer half-life (110 minutes), has been developed.
18F-Choline
Choline is a precursor of phospholipids, such as sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine (lecithin), which is essential for cell membrane synthesis during the cell proliferation process, the event that is augmented in malignant tissues [22].
18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT seems to be a promising modality in the evaluation of HCC, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 100%, respectively [23]. It is more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of this malignancy, particularly the well-differentiated type [23].
Again; the dual imaging tracer modality (FDG/Choline PET) yielded a higher overall sensitivity exceeding 90% in the detection with much improved specificity [24,25]. It was shown to be superior to CT or MRI for the detection of extrahepatic HCC, with an accuracy of 99% vs 32%, respectively [26].
Interestingly, all the sites of metastases in our patient were choline avid while showing no significant FDG activity.
In conclusion, the possibility of gastric metastasis should be kept in mind particularly in patients with advanced HCC when presenting with unexplained anemia; surveillance work-up should include conventional MRI/CT in combination with AFP and molecular imaging study namely 18F-Choline PET/CT to exclude local recurrence within the liver and distant metastases.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC) (RAC # 2151 003 and RAC # 2130 022). This work was funded in part by King Abdualaziz City for Science & Technology (14-MED 1963-20). Thanks also to the Cyclotron and Radiopharmaceutical Department for the support in providing the needed radiotracer for this study.
Consent for gastric wall metastases from HCC
Authors are confirming that the presented study is under an approved project by the research ethical committee and research advisor board at the institutions. Furthermore, no patient's identification been presented in this manuscript. Yet original consent and permission was signed by the patient for any future need.
References
- 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, J Ferlay, J Lortet-Tieulent, A Jemal. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bruix J, Reig M, Sherman M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:835–853. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uchino K, Tateishi R, Shiina S, Kanda M, Masuzaki R, Kondo Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: clinical features and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2011;117(19):4475–4483. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Senthilnathan S, Memon K, Lewandowski RJ. Extrahepatic metastases occur in a minority of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with locoregional therapies: analysing patterns of progression in 285 patients. Hepatology. 2012;55:1432–1442. doi: 10.1002/hep.24812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu ML, Tai WC, Chuah SK, Chiu YC, Wu KL, Chou YP. Gastric metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via a possible existing retrograde haematogenous pathway. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(2):408–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Terada T, Maruo H. Unusual extrahepatic metastatic sites from hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:816–820. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lin CP, Cheng JS, Lai KH, Lo GH, Hsu PI, Chan HH. Gastrointestinal metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiological and endoscopic studies of 11 cases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:536–541. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakajima K, Hosono T, Murao S, Nakajima T, Hanada M, Yoshii M. Retrograde metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma with an interesting lesion of the stomach–a case report. Gan No Rinsho. 1986;32:203–208. (in Japanese, Abstract in English) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Imai M, Ishikawa T, Okoshi M, Tomiyoshi K, Kojima Y. Hemorrhagic gastric metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma successfully treated using coil embolization of the left gastric artery. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1981;78:1998–2002. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2172-18. (in Japanese, Abstract in English) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A. Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1706. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Omata M, Cheng A-L, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017;11(4):317–370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee YJ, Lee JM, Lee JS, Lee HY, Park BH, Kim YH. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015;275(1):97–109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown RS, Leung JY, Fisher SJ, Frey KA, Ethier SP, Wahl RL. Intratumoral distribution of tritiated-FDG in breast carcinoma: correlation between glut-1 expression and FDG uptake. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1042–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wudel LJ, Jr., Delbeke D, Morris D, Rice M, Washington MK, Shyr Y. The role of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am Surg. 2003;69(2):117–124. discussion 124–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wolfort RM, Papillion PW, Turnage RH, Lillien DL, Ramaswamy MR, Zibari GB. Role of FDG-PET in the evaluation and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma with comparison of tumor size, AFP level, and histologic grade. Int Surg. 2010;95(1):67–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shiomi S, Kawabe J. Clinical applications of positron emission tomography in hepatic tumors. Hepatol Res. 2011;41(7):611–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin CY, Chen JH, Liang JA, Lin CC, Jeng LB, Kao CH. 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting extrahepatic metastases or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(9):2417–2422. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karanikas G, Beheshti M. ¹¹C-acetate PET/CT imaging: physiologic uptake, variants, and pitfalls. PET Clin. 2014;9(3):339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Park JW, Kim JH, Kim SK, Kang KW, Park KW, Choi JI. A prospective evaluation of 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT for detection of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(12):1912–1921. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huo L, Dang Y, Lv J, Xing H, Li F. Application of dual phase imaging of 11C-acetate positron emission tomography on differential diagnosis of small hepatic lesions. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cheung TT, Ho CL, Lo CM, Chen S, Chan SC, Chok KS. 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for clinical staging and selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation on the basis of Milan criteria: surgeon's perspective. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(2):192–200. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.107516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kuang Y, Salem N, Corn DJ, Erokwu B, Tian H, Wang F, Lee Z. Transport and metabolism of radiolabeled choline in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Pharm. 2010;7(6):2077–2092. doi: 10.1021/mp1001922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bieze M, Klümpen HJ, Verheij J, Beuers U, Phoa SS, van Gulik TM, Bennink RJ. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-methylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography for intra- and extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2014;59(3):996–1006. doi: 10.1002/hep.26781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Talbot JN, Fartoux L, Balogova S, Nataf V, Kerrou K, Gutman F. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with PET/CT: a prospective comparison of 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-FDG in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(11):1699–1706. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.075507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Castilla-Lièvre MA, Franco D, Gervais P, Kuhnast B, Agostini H, Marthey L. Diagnostic value of combining 11C-choline and 18F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(5):852–859. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lopci E, Torzilli G, Poretti D, de Neto LJ, Donadon M, Rimassa L. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-choline PET/CT in comparison with CT and/or MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(9):1399–1407. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


