Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0232648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232648

Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain

Juan M Requena-Mullor 1,2,, Jose Manuel García-Garrido 3, Pedro Antonio García 4, Estefanía Rodríguez 5,‡,*
Editor: Mirko Di Febbraro6
PMCID: PMC7773261  PMID: 33378350

Abstract

Verticillium wilt, caused by the soil-borne fungus Verticillium dahliae, is one of the most harmful diseases in Mediterranean olive-growing areas. Although, the effects of both soil temperature and moisture on V. dahliae are well known, there is scant knowledge about what climatic drivers affect the occurrence of the pathogen on a large scale. Here, we investigate what climatic drivers determine V. dahliae occurrence in olive-growing areas in southern Spain. In order to bridge this gap in knowledge, a large-scale field survey was carried out to collect data on the occurrence of V. dahliae in 779 olive groves in Granada province. Forty models based on competing combinations of climatic variables were fitted and evaluated using information-theoretic methods. A model that included a multiplicative combination of seasonal and extreme climatic variables was found to be the most viable one. Isothermality and the seasonal distribution of precipitation were the most important variables influencing the occurrence of the pathogen. The isothermal effect was in turn modulated by the seasonality of rainfall, and this became less negative as seasonality increases. Thus, V. dahliae occurs more frequently in olive-growing areas where the day-night temperature oscillation is lower than the summer-winter one. We also found that irrigation reduced the influence of isothermality on occurrence. Our results demonstrate that long-term compound climatic factors rather than “primary” variables, such as annual trends, can better explain the spatial patterns of V. dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean, southern Spain. One important implication of our study is that appropriate irrigation management, when temperature oscillation approaches optimal conditions for V. dahliae to thrive, may reduce the appearance of symptoms in olive trees.

Introduction

Verticillium dahliae Kleb. is a widespread soil-borne pathogen reported for many high-value crops in temperate zones [1, 2]. This pathogen is a highly polyphagous fungus that infects hundreds of dicots, including herbaceous and woody plants, causing, chlorosis, necrosis, stunting, vascular discolouration, and wilting [3, 4]. V. dahliae is of great concern in Mediterranean olive groves [57], where the olive species under cultivation (i.e., Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea) have crucial economic, social and environmental value, and therefore, the European Union’s agricultural policy is mainly aimed at protecting it [8]. Verticillium wilt is considered to be the most damaging disease for olives in Mediterranean countries as it causes yield losses and tree mortality [5, 9]. This disease thrives especially in intensively-farmed olive groves in Andalusia (southern Spain) [10] which is the world's leading olive tree grower, producing 900,000 tons of olive oil and 380,000 tons of table olives per year from 1.5 million hectares of farm land [11]. In western Andalusia, Verticillium wilt affects about 38–39% of crops [12, 13], while in the province of Granada (eastern Andalusia) V. dahliae affects around 14% of crops [14].

Verticillium wilt symptoms are divided into two categories which are associated with its two recognized pathotypes (i.e., virulent forms): defoliating (D), which is potentially lethal to the infested plant, and non-defoliating (ND), which causes a slow decline and partial defoliation [15, 16]. The predominance of virulent forms in Andalusian olive groves has strong implications for managing the disease [10]. Current protective measures for olives combine chemical treatments, resistant or tolerant cultivars or rootstocks, biological control, and physical and cultural solutions [5, 7, 10, 1719]. However, this integrated strategy has not proved fully successful, as the pathogen has a wide range of hosts, and V. dahliae produces resting structures, i.e., microsclerotia, capable of surviving even when there is no host in the soil for years [20]. In fact, inoculum density in the soil is the main factor behind the spread of the disease in olive trees [21].

Verticillium wilt development is driven by several factors such as host plant, inoculum density, pathogen dispersal mechanisms, and environmental conditions [1, 22]. The latter may, in turn, be influenced by climate change [23]. Specifically, the spread of the disease depends on inoculum density in the soil, which is strongly influenced by soil temperature and seasonal fluctuations [24, 25]. Verticillium wilt is mainly observed in the spring, whereas it decreases in the summer due to high temperatures [9, 12, 2631]. Previous studies have identified some abiotic factors behind the occurrence of the pathogen in olive groves in the Granada province [14, 32, 33]. These authors found that V. dahliae was up to 3 times more prevalent in irrigated olive groves than rainfed ones, and was more frequent when plant material came from nurseries than when it did not. In fact, the prevalence of the pathogen in olive plantations whose plant material came from nurseries reached 24.5%. Therefore, these findings highlight the importance of using cuttings which have been certified as free of the pathogen, and the role the infected plant material has in spreading the disease to non-infested cropping areas. Additionally, slope gradients and soil type both influence occurrence of the pathogen. For instance, V. dahliae occurrence was higher in olive groves located in saline, alkaline and steep slope soils [33].

The effects of both soil temperature and moisture on V. dahliae are well known locally (i.e. plot scale). For instance, Verticillium wilt in olive is favored by soil temperatures between 20 – 25°C [1]. The D pathotype is promoted by soil temperatures, ranging from 16 to 24°C whereas the ND pathotype thrived in lower soil temperatures, ranging from 16 to 20°C [25]. Similarly, several studies have shown that disease development, severity and inoculum density in olive fields are usually higher in wetter soils [5, 34, 35]. However, there is scant knowledge about how climatic factors affect the occurrence of the pathogen on a large scale. In fact, fungal plant pathogens are particularly under-represented in climatic niche modeling studies [36] but see [37]. Bridging this gap in knowledge remains a major challenge in research, partly due to the absence of spatially explicit data on the occurrence of V. dahliae on a larger scale. One notable study is that by [38] on the diversity of the pathogen population in southern Spain. Identifying the climatic drivers behind the occurrence of V. dahliae on a large scale will provide an insight into the pathogen ecology and help optimize strategies for managing the disease in olive groves.

Here, we used the data set collected by [14, 32, 33] in the Granada province to determine by modelling what climatic factors affect V. dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain. To this end, we tested a series of models with different combinations of climatic variables representing competing hypotheses, and used information-theoretic methods to select the most parsimonious model [39].

Materials and methods

The sampling survey, isolation and V. dahliae identification protocols used in this research are based on previous studies [14, 32, 33].

Study area and sampling survey design

There are 183,000 ha of olive groves in the province of Granada, making it the third largest olive oil producer in Andalusia [40]. In this province, olives are distributed among olive-growing areas which vary greatly in terms of their physical characteristics, management practices, olive varieties and environmental factors [14]. Thus, a stratified double-sampling technique was designed in order to select the olive groves [14]. This technique is commonly applied to heterogeneous populations and collecting data based on sample sizes that are proportional to the relative size of the strata [41]. Proportions in the first sampling level were based on the surface area (ha) of olive groves in each olive-growing zone. The second level consisted of olive groves whose probability of infection was proportional to their size (PPS). PPS gives a probability of selecting a sampling unit (e.g., olive grove) in proportion to the size of its population [41]. It was assumed a priori that the probability of an olive grove being infected with V. dahliae was 50%. Finally, the sampling survey for evaluating occurrence of V. dahliae in the study area was performed in 779 olive groves (Fig 1), over 2,833 ha with 139 olive trees/ha and a standard error of ≤ 2.48 [14].

Fig 1. The Granada province study area boundary and the location of the 779 survey records that comprised the presence and absence of point locations for V. dahliae used in this study (see Materials and Methods section).

Fig 1

The administrative boundaries were obtained from public spatial data layers of the Environmental Information Network of Andalusia (https://descargasrediam.cica.es/repo/s/RUR?path=%2F). The digital elevation model showed as a base map was downloaded from a public database available in (http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/prodCartografia/bc/mdt.htm). Date accessed: October 1st, 2019. All the data is compatible with the CC-BY 4.0 license.

Isolation and identification of V. dahliae in olive trees

From 2003 to 2005, a sampling survey was carried out during the spring and autumn, the most suitable periods for assessing the occurrence of V. dahliae in plants [29]. Wherever possible, ten olive trees with typical symptoms of V. dahliae were sampled for each olive-grove [14]. Verticillium isolates from olive trees were recovered from twig tissues using the standardized isolation technique [42]. For each tree, six olive twigs were washed thoroughly under running tap water and debarked. 5 mm long olive twigs sections were taken from a laminar flow bench, whose surfaces were sterilized in 10% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and rinsed twice with sterile distilled H2O and dried on sterilized paper. After drying completely, eight twig sections were transferred to 90 mm Petri plates with water agar amended with Aureomycin (1 l of distilled water, 20 g of agar and 30 mg of aureomycin). Three Petri plates were used per tree. All samples were incubated at 25°C in the dark for 30 days [14, 32, 33]. V. dahliae isolates were initially identified on the basis of morphological characteristics of verticillate conidiophores and the formation of microsclerotia.

Fungal DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Kit (Qiagen, Germany) from harvested mycelia of V. dahliae isolates growing in PDB (Potato Dextrose Broth) [14, 32, 33]. DNA was amplified in PCR assays to confirm the identity of the 123 V. dahliae isolates recovered. Primers DB19/DB22 amplified V. dahliae specific DNA bands of 523 or 539 bp [43].

Environmental variables

We checked the correlations between the nineteen available bioclimatic variables in the WorldClim version 2 database (1970–2000) (http://www.worldclim.org/) and selected the five with a Spearman rank-correlation under 0.6 [44], i.e., annual rainfall (AnnualRainfall), intra-annual rainfall seasonality (coefficient of variation) (RainfallSeasonality), intra-annual temperature seasonality (standard deviation x 100) (TempSeasonality), maximum temperature of the warmest month (MaxTemp), and isothermality ((mean diurnal temperature range/temperature annual range) x 100) (Isothermality). Isothermality quantifies the degree to which day-to-night temperatures oscillate in relation to summer-to-winter (annual) oscillations [45] (see S1 Fig). These variables were downloaded in BIL/HDR format at a cell size of 30 arc-seconds (~1 km) using the R package “raster” [46]. We found the average of the climatic variables using a buffer based on the area and centroid of each olive grove, both of which were obtained from the Spanish Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/). Similarly, both watering (i.e., irrigated vs. rainfed) and plant material origin (i.e., annual pruning (traditional propagation of large hard-wood cuttings) vs. young plants from nurseries) were included as covariates in the models. Irrigation was shown to influence the occurrence of V. dahliae in the study area [14]. Likewise, the origin of the propagation material also had a bearing on this [33]. Finally, since plantation size was expected to positively affect pathogen occurrence, the olive grove area (in ha) was also included as a covariate. The data set is available at https://github.com/jmrmcode/Verticillium-wilt-Dataset [47].

Modelling approach

Although pathogens are mainly dependent on the occurrence of their hosts, climate is also an important factor that influences their distribution on a wider scale [48]. Indeed, complex interactions among multiple climatic factors influenced the distribution of a range of plant pathogenic fungi commonly reported in Europe [4952]. Here, we explored the climatic drivers which affected V. dahliae occurrence by testing a series of competing models with different combinations of climatic variables associated with five hypotheses and then, selected the most parsimonious model using information-theoretic methods (see below) [39]. Specifically, we designed a set of forty candidate Generalized Linear Models (GLM) grouped into the following hypotheses: V. dahliae occurrence on a large scale depended on (1) annual trends in climatic variables, (2) seasonality of climatic variables, (3) extreme climatic variables, (4) an additive combination of hypotheses 1, 2, and 3, and (5) an additive and multiplicative (interactions) combination. We showed occurrence of V. dahliae by allocating a “1” to those olive groves where the detection was positive and “0” when it was negative (Fig 1). All predictor variables were standardized to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. We applied the complementary log-log (cloglog) function Eq (1) to link V. dahliae occurrence and the linear combination of predictors and covariates. The cloglog function is not symmetric in the interval [0,1] and therefore, it is frequently used for binary responses when the probability of an event is very low [53].

Cloglog(x)=log(log(1π)) (1)

where π is the probability of V. dahliae occurrence. The information-theoretic approach was used to select the most parsimonious model/s and rank the remaining ones [54]. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) is a measure of model fit that penalizes the likelihood according to the number of parameters in the model. The lower the AIC value, the more parsimonious the model is [54]. Delta AIC (ΔAIC) was calculated as the difference in AIC between each model and the lowest AIC value in the series. Models with ΔAIC < 2 have “considerable” support [54]. In addition, Akaike weights (wi) were calculated to rank models with ΔAIC < 2, in turn. In order to verify whether the interactions between climatic and abiotic factors were significant, we included interaction terms between climatic variables, watering and plant material origin in the top-ranked model (see S1 Table for details).

We assessed how accurate the predictions of the model were by comparing the Log‐Loss [55] achieved by the null-model (i.e., intercept-only) as a baseline with that of the top-ranked model using a 10-fold cross-validation of the presence-absence sampled data. Log‐Loss measures the uncertainty of fitted probabilities by comparing them to actual observations. Each data partition was made by randomly splitting the data into 10 distinct blocks and using 9 to train and 1 to test. A key assumption for regression is that model residuals were not correlated, we checked this assumption by estimating the Moran’s I statistic using the inverse of the distances between observations as weights [56]. All statistical analyses were performed with the R software V. 3.6.2 (R Core Team 2019) using the “qpcR”, “spdep”, “Metrics”, and “stats” packages [5659]. Finally, we carried out a sensitivity analysis to assess how much models performance changes when using a different modeling technique. To do that, we compared the prediction capacity of our top-ranked logistic model (see Table 1) with boosted regression trees using a 10-fold cross-validation (see S1 Appendix for details).

Table 1. Highest ranked competing models for Verticillium dahliae occurrence in olive groves of Granada province (southern Spain).

Ranking Model AIC ΔAIC wi
1 RainfallSeasonality x Isothermality 562.83 0.00 0.273
2 RainfallSeasonality + Isothermality 564.29 1.46 0.132
3 AnnualRainfall x RainfallSeasonality x TempSeasonality 565.23 2.4 0.082
4 RainfallSeasonality x TempSeasonality x Isothermality 565.71 2.88 0.065
5 RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality + Isothermality 565.95 3.12 0.057
6 RainfallSeasonality + MaxTemp + Isothermality 565.99 3.16 0.056
7 MaxTemp + Isothermality 566.62 3.79 0.041
8 Isothermality 566.67 3.84 0.040
9 RainfallSeasonality x MaxTemp x Isothermality 567.51 4.68 0.026
10 RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality + MaxTemp + Isothermality 567.89 5.06 0.022
11 TempSeasonality + MaxTemp + Isothermality 567.92 5.09 0.021
12 TempSeasonality x MaxTemp x Isothermality 567.94 5.11 0.021
13 AnnualRainfall + MaxTemp + Isothermality 568.15 5.32 0.019
14 TempSeasonality x Isothermality 568.35 5.52 0.017
15 AnnualRainfall x Isothermality 568.36 5.53 0.017
16 RainfallSeasonality x TempSeasonality x MaxTemp x Isothermality 568.41 5.58 0.017
17 TempSeasonality + Isothermality 568.47 5.64 0.016
18 AnnualRainfall + Isothermality 568.55 5.72 0.016
19 RainfallSeasonality x MaxTemp 569.02 6.19 0.012
20 AnnualRainfall + RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality + MaxTemp + Isothermality 569.87 7.04 0.008
21 AnnualRainfall + MaxTemp 570.36 7.53 0.006
22 MaxTemp 570.47 7.64 0.007
23 AnnualRainfall x MaxTemp 570.56 7.73 0.006
24 RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality 571.79 8.96 0.003
25 RainfallSeasonality + MaxTemp 572.14 9.31 0.003
26 AnnualRainfall x RainfallSeasonality x TempSeasonality x MaxTemp x Isothermality 572.19 9.36 0.003
27 TempSeasonality + MaxTemp 572.29 9.46 0.002
28 RainfallSeasonality x TempSeasonality x MaxTemp 572.31 9.48 0.002
29 AnnualRainfall x MaxTemp x Isothermality 572.54 9.71 0.002
30 RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality + MaxTemp 572.67 9.84 0.002
31 TempSeasonality x MaxTemp 572.92 10.09 0.002
32 AnnualRainfall + RainfallSeasonality + TempSeasonality 573.29 10.46 0.001
33 TempSeasonality 577.8 14.97 1.5E-04
34 RainfallSeasonality 579.4 16.57 6.9E-05
35 AnnualRainfall + TempSeasonality 579.76 16.93 5.8E-05
36 AnnualRainfall + RainfallSeasonality 580.22 17.39 4.6E-05
37 AnnualRainfall x TempSeasonality 580.46 17.63 4.0E-05
38 AnnualRainfall 580.53 17.7 3.9E-05
39 AnnualRainfall x RainfallSeasonality 581.4 18.57 2.5E-05
40 Intercept only 678.18 115.35 2.5E-26

According to the rule that ΔAIC < 2 suggests the best parsimony in a group of candidate models, two models (marked in bold) was selected to likely explain occurrence of V. dahliae in the study area. AIC: Akaike Information Criterion; ΔAIC: AIC differences; wi: Akaike weights.

Results

V. dahliae was detected in 122 of the 779 olive groves surveyed, yielding a sample occurrence of 0.17, which justified the use of cloglog as the link function in our models. Two models reached the highest parsimony rank according to AIC scores criterion, i.e., ΔAIC < 2 (Table 1). These models consisted of a combination of seasonal (rainfall seasonality) and extreme climatic variables (isothermality) (Hypotheses 4 and 5). Isothermality had a negative effect on V. dahliae, with a predictive decrease in occurrence of 53.9% (p-value = 0.0006) when this variable increased by 0.45% in rainfed olive groves. However, rainfall seasonality had no discernable marginal effect on pathogen occurrence (Fig 2). The top-ranked model included an interaction term between both climatic variables. We found that when rainfall seasonality increased by 4.4 (i.e., standard deviation of 1) the effect of isothermality on V. dahliae occurrence rose by 86.5% (p-value = 0.04) (Figs 2 and 3), and therefore, this effect became less negative. Considering the relative importance of the interaction between climatic factors and watering and plant material origin in the top-ranked model, we found that by including the interaction between isothermality and watering, the overall model performance improved (AIC = 559.8) and there was a significant effect on V. dahliae occurrence (Fig 2 and S1 Table). As olive groves changed from rainfed to irrigated, the effect of isothermality on occurrence became less negative by 66.8% (p-value = 0.04) (Fig 3).

Fig 2. Effect size plot of the climatic variables and abiotic covariates influence on Verticillium dahliae occurrence according to the most plausible model (see Table 1).

Fig 2

Effect sizes are shown on a cloglog scale. Rainfed and annual pruning were treated as reference levels for watering and plant material origin, respectively.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

The predicted effect of Isothermality on Verticillium dahliae occurrence as a function of (a) RainfallSeasonality and (b) Watering according to the most plausible model (see Table 1). Effect sizes are shown on a cloglog scale. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval for the fitted cloglog curve.

As expected, the predictive capacity of the top-ranked model was better than that of the intercept-only model (mean Log-Loss = 0.36 ±0.013 SE and 0.43 ±0.015 SE, respectively; lower Log-Loss values indicate better performance), with an improvement in the predictions of 22.24% ±12.64 SE (see S2 Table). No spatial patterns were found in the model residuals (Moran’s I statistic = 0.027; p-value = 0.008; see S2 Fig) and this indicated that the climatic variables included in the top-ranked model did indeed account for the spatial variation of V. dahliae occurrence. Finally, the model comparison results showed no evidence of improving predictive performance by the BRT models compared to that obtained by the top-ranked binomial model, supporting the linear regression modeling approach adopted in our study (see S3 Table in S1 Appendix).

Discussion

V. dahliae is one of the most harmful pathogens in the Mediterranean region [60], but, surprisingly, no studies have identified what climatic drivers determine the occurrence of this pathogen on a large scale. We found that long-term compound climatic factors rather than ‘primary’ variables, such as annual trends, provided a more comprehensive explanation of the spatial patterns of V. dahliae occurrence in olive-growing areas in southern Spain. Here, compound climatic factors refer to climatic variables that integrate different aspects of climate components at multiple temporal scales. For example, isothermality represents the ratio between temperature oscillations at two temporal scales: daily and seasonal, and it captures wider ecological trends better than the temperature for a given day (i.e., a “primary” variable) due to the inherent variability associated with weather. Isothermality was the most important climatic factor for the pathogen occurrence, suggesting an intricate relationship between V. dahliae and climate as discussed below.

In the Western Mediterranean basin, seasonal rainfall regimes are equinoctial, with a rainy season in autumn and another secondary rainy period in spring [61]. In contrast, maximum and minimum temperatures are reached in summer and winter, respectively. Specifically, in Granada province, precipitation mainly occurs in November and early spring, while there is almost no precipitation in July and August. Summers are extremely hot and winters moderately cold, with large variations in temperature between the day and night (maximum temperature > 30°C; minimum temperature < 20°C) [62]. Thus, high rainfall seasonality and isothermality, i.e., the two climatic factors that determined Verticillium wilt occurrence in Granada province, implies more varied distribution of rainfall throughout seasons, as well as greater differences between cold and hot periods, with mild temperatures in between. Our results, confirmed findings from previous reports, by demonstrating that weather oscillation helped V. dahliae thrive in Mediterranean olive groves, i.e., areas where rainfall mainly occurred in autumn and early spring, and with mild temperatures [6, 35]. According to [6], the optimal temperature range for V. dahliae to thrive is between 22°-25°C. The optimum temperature of the soil for V. dahliae was around 24°C, after which there was a decline in the abundance of the pathogen when soil temperature exceeded 28°C [25]. Several authors observed that a high temperature in summer can suppress V. dahliae in olive trees [29, 30, 63].

We also corroborated previous results that indicated irrigation was a significant abiotic factor for V. dahliae [14], since there was a strong positive correlation between irrigated olive groves and V. dahliae occurrence. Furthermore, we provided new findings on the relationship between climate and watering by showing how irrigation can mitigate the negative effect of isothermality on occurrence. Many studies have shown a relationship between V. dahliae and water abundance in soil. The inoculum of the pathogen was more frequently found in moist soil around drippers [34]. In addition, the disease incidence was positively associated with the number of years of irrigation and water dosage [64]. The damage caused by V. dahliae in Mediterranean olive groves has steadily increased over the last few decades due to the implementation of irrigation systems [12, 65, 66], which may help propagules of the pathogen to disperse [67, 68]. A similar process occurs in cotton, which is not affected by Verticillium wilt under rainfed conditions, although it is with irrigation [20]. In accordance with previous results, we propose that water from irrigation may keep soil temperature close to the optimal range for V. dahliae, and hence help it survive in areas where day-tonight temperature oscillations are higher. Regarding the marginal effect of the plant material origin, our results were also consistent with that found by [33] in which young plants from nurseries were found to increase the probability of V. dahliae occurrence. This result underlines the importance of abiotic factors in reducing disease risk during the early stages of cultivation. Infected planting material from the nursery is one of the main reasons for V. dahliae infestation in free-pathogen growing areas [33]. In order to prevent the pathogen from spreading, particularly the most virulent forms, such as the defoliating pathotype (D), farmers should use only pathogen-tested propagative material. Since the role of non-climatic factors on the pathogen is beyond our study, we recommend reading the above mentioned article for further information.

We expected annual precipitation to be a significant factor affecting the occurrence of the pathogen in olive groves. However, we found that models that included rainfall seasonality had a better fit. This finding may be due to the fact that optimal soil moisture and temperature conditions are required to occur simultaneously. Rainfall in semi-arid areas, such as around Granada, is scarce and irregularly distributed in time and space [6971]. Since V. dahliae thrives in mild temperature conditions [6], rainy periods must coincide with warmer ones. These findings highlight the seasonal nature of the pathogen, as reported in other studies on Mediterranean olive growing-areas, which found V. dahliae caused wilt disease in olive trees in late-spring and early-winter [9, 26, 27, 2931]. Moreover, our results showed that rainfall seasonality modulated the negative effect of isothermality, which became more negative as the seasonality decreased. We propose that the high occurrence of the pathogen found in the northwest of Granada province [14] can be explained by the combination of low rainfall seasonality and high isothermality that characterizes such area.

Our findings have important implications for controlling the spread of V. dahliae in semi-arid Mediterranean olive-growing areas, as the risk of Verticillium wilt can be reduced by managing irrigation. Since irrigation may reduce the negative influence of isothermality on the pathogen occurrence, shifting from rainfed to irrigated olive groves may entails a higher risk in those areas with low isothermality. This combination draws areas potentially susceptible to V. dahliae occurrence, for example, the irrigated growing-olive areas located in the north of the study area which have low isothermality and the highest occurrence of Verticillium wilt in Granada province [14]. In contrast, the low pathogen’s occurrence found in the south [14] may be a result of the conjunction of rainfed olive grove and high isothermality. We showed that V. dahliae is a highly seasonal pathogen that requires rainy and warm periods to occur simultaneously. On this basis, reducing irrigation in spring and autumn could prevent the disease from spreading, particularly in areas with low rainfall seasonality and isothermality. Our results concur with that of [35], who suggested that scheduling irrigation treatment on the basis of rainfall could be a good strategy for maintaining soil moisture below levels which are favourable to the pathogen. They concluded that daily -as opposed to both weekly and biweekly- irrigation helps Verticillium wilt thrives. They also advised that in order to reduce symptoms of the disease, soil water content should be lower than 24% and irrigation should be done on a biweekly basis. However, it should be stressed that although less frequent irrigation could reduce the risk of Verticillium wilt, this will need to be balanced with the water needs of the olive trees in order to achieve good and high-quality oil yields. For instance, irrigation prior to anthesis produced lower fusarium head blight than continuous irrigation throughout anthesis [72]. However, finishing irrigation prior to anthesis resulted in reduced yields in comparison with continuous irrigation. Water stress from inflorescence development (mid-April to the start of June) to fruit set (May to June) should be avoided. Also, the periods of initial fruit growth and oil accumulation in the autumn are sensitive to water deficits (September to October) [73]. Consequently, there are 3 extremely critical periods for crop productivity, during which time soil moisture must be kept optimal. Unfortunately, these periods also coincide with Verticilllium wilt development. Therefore, studies need to be made to determine disease development, soil moisture levels and rainfall during those critical periods to assess influences on the pathogen and olive tree yields. Evidentially the response of any given soil-borne disease to the range of ways of managing irrigation varies widely and must be addressed for each individual plant-pathogen system [74].

Conclusions

Our study is the first to explore what climatic factors influence the occurrence of V. dahliae in Mediterranean olive groves in southern Spain. Isothermality had a negative effect on occurrence, but this was modulated by rainfall seasonality and watering. Since V. dahliae thrives in mild temperature conditions, rainy periods must coincide with warm ones in order to provide optimal conditions for the pathogen to thrive. Therefore, appropriate irrigation management in periods when the pathogen spreads, i.e., spring and autumn, may prevent symptoms of the disease. However, reducing irrigation during spring and autumn may also have undesirable side effects such as decreased yields. Thus, future studies at finer scales that consider microclimate conditions in periods in which Verticillium wilt develop are required to assess how to best manage irrigation.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Comparison of model fit when including interaction terms between climatic variables and covariates.

Each pairwise interaction was separately included in the top-ranked model for V. dahliae occurrence (see Table 1 in the main manuscript). We ordered the models by their AIC values and checked whether the interaction term was significant or not.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Comparison between the top-ranked model and the intercept-only model using 10-fold cross-validation.

The performance of the models was evaluated using the Log‐Loss. Lower values of this model selection index indicate better model performance. Performance measures were averaged throughout the ten data partitions. Improvement was calculated as [(Top-ranked—Only-intercept) / Only-intercept] * 100. Each data partition was made by randomly splitting the data into 10 distinct blocks and using 9 to train and 1 to test.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Map of WorldClim climatic variables averaged for the years 1970–2000 in Granada province (southern Spain).

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Analysis of the top-ranked model residuals.

(a) Bubble plot of the standardized residuals from the top-ranked model (see Table 1 in the main manuscript) including an interaction term between isothermality and watering. (b) Spline correlogram of the residuals using the function spline.correlog in the “ncf” R package [1]. The spatial dependence is tested as a continuous function of distance. The gray shadows represent the 95% confidence interval.

(DOCX)

S1 Appendix. Comparison between boosted regression trees and binomial models for V. dahliae occurrence.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank farmers from Granada province for kindly permitting us to research their olive groves. We also wish to give special thanks to Mr. Antonio León, chief executive officer of Caja Rural in Granada, for encouraging this research and Toby Wakely for reviewing this manuscript in English.

Data Availability

All data are available from the GitHub repository (https://github.com/jmrmcode/Verticillium-wilt-Dataset.git).

Funding Statement

E. Rodríguez; Caja Rural Foundation of Granada; https://www.fundacioncrg.com/; NO.

References

  • 1.Pegg GF, Brady BL. Verticillium wilts Wallingford (United Kingdom) and New York: CABI Publishing; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Daayf F. Verticillium wilts in crop plants: Pathogen invasion and host defence responses. Can J Plant Pathol. 2015;37:8–20. 10.1080/07060661.2014.989908 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhat RG, Subbarao KV. Host range specificity in Verticillium dahliae. Phytopathology. 1999;89: 1218–1225. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McCain AH, Raabe RD, Wilhelm S. Plants resistant or susceptible to Verticillium wilt. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California: Leaflet: 2703. 1981. Available from: http://depts.washington.edu/hortlib/resources/ucdavis_verticillium.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsror L (Lahkim). Review, epidemiology and control of Verticillium wilt on olive. Israel J Plant Sci. 2011;59(1): 59–69. 10.1560/IJPS.59.1.59 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiménez-Díaz RM, Cirulli M, Bubici G, Jiménez-Gasco LM, Antoniou PP, Tjamos EC. 2012. Verticillium wilt, a major threat to olive production: Current status and future prospects for its management. Plant Dis. 2012;96: 304–329. 10.1094/PDIS-06-11-0496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Keykhasaber M, Thomma BPHJ, Hiemstra JA. Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium dahliae in woody plants with emphasis on olive and shade trees. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2017;150: 21–37. 10.1007/s10658-017-1273-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abassi F. Olive oil: A balanced world market. Olivae. 2001;89: 30–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thanassoulopoulos CC, Biris DA, Tjamos EC. Survey of Verticillium wilt of olive trees in Greece. Plant Dis Rept. 1979;63: 936–940. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mercado-Blanco J, López-Escudero FJ. Commentary.Verticillium wilt of olive and its control: The heat is on. Plant Soil. 2012;355: 17–21. 10.1007/s11104-011-1091-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodríguez‐Cohard JC, Sánchez‐Martínez JD, Gallego‐Simón VJ. Olive crops and rural development: Capital, knowledge and tradition. Reg Sci Pol Prac. 2018;11(6): 1–15. 10.1111/rsp3.12115 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blanco-López MA, Jiménez-Díaz RM, Caballero JM. Symptomatology, incidence and distribution of Verticillium wilt of olive trees in Andalucia. Phytopathologia Mediterr. 1984;23(1): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sánchez-Hernández ME, Ruiz-Dávila A, Pérez de Algaba A, Blanco-López MA, Trapero-Casas A. Occurrence and etiology of death of young olive trees in southern Spain. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1998;104: 347–357. 10.1023/A:1008624929989 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodríguez E, García-Garrido JM, García PA, Campos M. Large-scale epidemiological study and spatial patterns of Verticillium wilt in olive orchards in southern Spain. Crop Prot. 2009;28: 46–52. 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.08.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schnathorst WC, Mathre DE. Host range and differentiation of a severe form of Verticillium albo-atrum in cotton. Phytopathology. 1966;56: 1155–1161. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rodríguez-Jurado D, Blanco-López MA, Rapoport HF, Jiménez-Díaz RM. Present status of Verticillium wilt of olive in Andalucia (southern Spain). Bull. OEPP/EPPO. 1993;23(3): 513–516. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1993.tb01362.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klosterman SJ, Atallah ZK, Vallad GE, Subbarao KV. Diversity, pathogenicity, and management of Verticillium Species. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009;47: 39–62. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bubici G, Cirulli M. Control of Verticillium wilt of olive by resistant rootstock. Plant Soil. 2012;352(1): 363–376. 10.1007/s11104-011-1002-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.López-Escudero FJ, Mercado-Blanco J. Verticillium wilt of olive: a case study to implement an integrated strategy to control a soil-borne pathogen. Plant Soil. 2011;344: 1–50. 10.1007/s11104-010-0629-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schnathorst WC. Life cycle and epidemiology of Verticillium In: Mace ME, Bell AA, Beckman CH eds. Fungal wilt diseases of plants. New York: Academic Press; 1981. pp. 81–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.López-Escudero FJ, Blanco-López MA. Relationship between the inoculum density of Verticillium dahliae and the progress of Verticillium wilt of olive. Plant Dis. 2007;91 (11): 1372–1378. 10.1094/PDIS-91-11-1372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Katan J. Diseases caused by soilborne pathogens: biology, management and challenges. J Plant Pathol. 2017:99(2): 305–315. 10.4454/jpp.v99i2.3862 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kocmánková E, Trnka M, Juroch J, Dubrovský M, Semerádová D, Možný M, et al. Impact of Climate Change on the Occurrence and Activity of Harmful Organisms. Plant Protect Sci. 200945: S48–S52. 10.17221/2835-PPS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeVay JE, Forrester LL, Garber RH, Butterfield EJ. Characteristics and concentration of propagules of Verticillium dahliae in air-dried field soils in relation to the prevalence of Verticillium wilt in cotton. Phytopathology. 1974;64: 22–29. 10.1094/Phyto-64-22 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Calderón R, Lucena C, Trapero-Casas JL, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Navas-Cortés JA. Soil temperature determines the reaction of olive cultivars to Verticillium dahliae Pathotypes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10): e110664 10.1371/journal.pone.0110664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilhelm S, Taylor JB. Control of Verticillium wilt of olive through natural recovery and resistance. Phytopathology. 1965;55: 310–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vigouroux A. Verticillium dahliae agent d’un dépréissement de l’olivier en France. Ann Phytopathology. 1975;7: 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Montes F, Páez JI, Vega JM, Duhart ME. Épocas de aislamiento de Verticillium dahliae Kleb. en olivar de la provincia de Sevilla. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal y Plagas. 1997;23: 439–447. Available from: https://www.mapa.gob.es/ministerio/pags/Biblioteca/Revistas/pdf_plagas%2FBSVP-23-03-439-447.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Levin AG, Lavee S, Tsror L. Epidemiology of Verticillium dahliae on olive (cv. Picual) and its effects on yield under saline conditions. Plant Pathol. 2003;52(2): 212–218. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00809.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Navas-Cortés JA, Landa BB, Mercado-Blanco J, Trapero-Casas JL, Rodríguez-Jurado D, Jiménez-Díaz RM. Spatiotemporal analysis of spread of Verticillium dahliae pathotypes within a high tree density olive orchard in southern Spain. Phytopathology. 2008;98(2): 167–180. 10.1094/PHYTO-98-2-0167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bubici G, Nigro F, Ferrara M, Cirulli M. Epidemiological study on Verticillium wilt of olive in southern Italy. J Plant Pathol. 2009;91(4 Suppl): S4–S51. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rodríguez E, García-Garrido JM, García PA, Campos M. Agricultural factors affecting Verticillium wilt in olive orchards in Spain. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2008;122: 287–295. 10.1007/s10658-008-9287-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rodríguez E, García-Garrido JM, García PA, Campos M. Implications of plant material origin, land use history and soil properties in the incidence of Verticillium wilt in olive groves. J Plant Pathol. 2011;93(1): 111–118. 10.4454/jpp.v93i1.280 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.López-Escudero FJ, Blanco-López MA. Effects of drip irrigation on population of Verticillium dahliae in olive orchards. J Phytopathol. 2005;153(4): 238–239. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.00961.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pérez-Rodríguez M, Serrano N, Arquero O, Orgaz F, Moral J, López-Escudero FJ. The Effect of Short Irrigation Frequencies on the Development of Verticillium Wilt in the Susceptible Olive Cultivar ‘Picual’ under Field. Plant Dis. 2016;100(9): 1880–1888. 10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1018-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ireland KB, Kriticos DJ. Why are plant pathogens under-represented in eco-climatic niche modelling?. Int J Pest Manage. 2019;65(3): 207–216. 10.1080/09670874.2018.1543910 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hao T, Guillera-Arroita G, May TW, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J. Using Species Distribution Models For Fungi. Fungal Biol Rev. 2020;34(2): 74–88. 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jiménez-Díaz RM, Olivares-García C, Landa BB, Jiménez-Gasco MM, Navas-Cortés JA. Region-wide analysis of genetic diversity in Verticillium dahliae populations infecting olive in southern Spain and agricultural factors influencing the distribution and prevalence of vegetative compatibility groups and pathotypes. Phytopathology. 2011;101(3): 304–315. 10.1094/PHYTO-07-10-0176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Greaves RK, Sanderson RA, Rushton SP. Predicting species occurrence using information-theoretic approaches and significance testing: An example of dormouse distribution in Cumbria, UK. Biol Conserv. 2006;130: 239–250. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sánchez-Martínez JD, Gallego-Simón VJ, Araque-Jiménez E. El olivar andaluz y sus transformaciones recientes. The andalusian olive grove and its recent change. Estudios Geográficos. 2011;270: 203–229. 10.3989/estgeogr.201109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bejarano-Alcázar J, Blanco-López MA, Melero-Vara JM, Jiménez-Díaz RM. Etiology, importance, and distribution of Verticillium wilt of cotton in southern Spain. Plant Dis. 1996;80(11):1233–1238. 10.1094/PD-80-1233 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carder JH, Morton A, Tabrett AM, Barbara DJ. Detection and differentiation by PCR of subspecific groups within two Verticillium species causing vascular wilts in herbaceous hosts In: Schots A, Dewey FM, Oliver R eds. Modern Assays for Plant Pathogenic Fungi: Identification, Detection and Quantification. Oxford: CAB International; 1994. pp. 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gallien L, Douzet R, Pratte S, Zimmermann NE, Thuiller W. Invasive species distribution models–how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012;21(11): 1126–1136. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00768.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O’Donnell MS, Ignizio DA. Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous United States: U.S Geological Survey Data Series; 691 2012. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/691/ds691.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hijmans RJ. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.0–12. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Requena-Mullor JM, García-Garrido JM, García PA, Rodríguez E. Verticillium-wilt-Occurrence-Dataset v.1. 10.5281/zenodo.4004906 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Guernier V, Hochberg ME, Guégan JF. Ecology Drives the Worldwide Distribution of Human Diseases. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(6): e141 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Reynaud G, Déqué M, Badeau V, Piou D, et al. Simulating the effects of a climate-change scenario on the geographical range and activity of forest-pathogenic fungi. Canadian J Plant Pathol. 2007;29(2): 101–120. 10.1080/07060660709507447 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bosso L, Luchi N, Maresi G, Cristinzio G, Smeraldo S, Russo D. Predicting current and future disease outbreaks of Diplodia sapinea shoot blight in Italy: species distribution models as a tool for forest management planning. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2017;400: 655–664. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Doohan FM, Brennan J, Cooke BM. Influence of climatic factors on Fusarium species pathogenic to cereals In: Xu X, Bailey JA, Cooke BM eds. Epidemiology of Mycotoxin Producing Fungi. Springer, Dordrecht: 2003. pp. 755–768. 10.1007/978-94-017-1452-5_10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Launay M, Caubel J, Bourgeois G, Huard F, Garcia de Cortazar-Atauri I, Bancal MO, et al. Climatic indicators for crop infection risk: Application to climate change impacts on five major foliar fungal diseases in Northern France. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2014;197: 147–158. 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hardi JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions. Texas: A Stata Press Publication, StatCorp LP; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Phillips SJ, Dudík M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31(2): 161–175. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bivand RS, Wong DWS. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST. 2018;27(3): 716–748. 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: 2019. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Spiess Andrej-Nikolai. qpcR: Modelling and Analysis of Real-Time PCR Data. R package version 1.4–1. 2018. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=qpcR [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hamner B, Frasco M. Metrics: Evaluation Metrics for Machine Learning. R package version 0.1.4. 2018. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Metrics [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hiemstra JA, Harris DC. A compendium of Verticillium wilts in tree species. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lionello P, Boscoso R, Malanotte-Rizzoli P. Mediterranean Climate Variability Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sumner G, Homarb V, Ramis C. Precipitation seasonality in eastern and southern coastal Spain. International J Climatol. 2001;21: 219–247 10.1002/joc.600 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tosi L, Zazzerini A. An epidemiological study on Verticillium wilt of olive in central Italy. Olivae. 1998;71: 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pérez-Rodríguez M, Alcántara E, Serrano N, Lorite I, Arquero O, Orgaz-Rosua F, et al. The influence of irrigation frequency on the onset and development of Verticillium wilt of olive. Plant Dis. 2015;99(4): 488–495. 10.1094/PDIS-06-14-0599-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Al-Ahmad MA, Mosli MN. Verticillium wilt of olive in Syria. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO. 1993;23: 521–529. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Serrhini MN, Zeroual A. Verticillium wilt in Morocco. Olivae. 1995;58: 58–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rodríguez-Jurado D, Bejarano-Alcázar J. Dispersión de Verticillium dahliae en el agua utilizada para el riego de olivares en Andalucía. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal, Plagas. 2007;33: 547–562. Available at: https://www.mapa.gob.es/ministerio/pags/biblioteca/revistas/pdf_Plagas/BSVP_33_04_547_562.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 68.García-Cabello S, Pérez-Rodríguez M, Blanco-López MA, López-Escudero FJ. Distribution of Verticillium dahliae through watering systems in widely irrigated olive growing areas in Andalucia (southern Spain). Eur J Plant Pathol. 2012;133: 877 10.1007/s10658-012-0011-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bracken LJ, Cox NJ, Shannon J. The relationship between rainfall inputs and flood generation in south–east Spain. Hydrol Process. 2008;22(5): 683–696. 10.1002/hyp.6641 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lázaro R, Rodrigo FS, Gutiérrez L, Domingo F, Puigdefábregas J. Analysis of a 30-year rainfall record (1967–1997) in semiarid SE Spain for implications on vegetation. J. Arid Environ. 2001;48: 373–395. 10.1006/jare.2000.0755 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Molina-Sanchis I, Lázaro R, Arnau-Rosalén E, Calvo-Cases A. Rainfall timing and runoff: The influence of the criterion for rain event separation. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 2016;64(3): 226–236. 10.1515/johh-2016-0024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Turkington TK, Orr DD, Kuzyk A, Dunn R, Kumar K, Xi K, et al. Fusarium head blight survey of wheat, Alberta 2003. Canadian Plant Disease Survey. 2004;84: 68–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.FAO. Crop Yield Response to Water. Rome, Italy: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 66. Steduto P, Hsiao T C, Fereres E, Raes D eds. 2012.
  • 74.Café-Filho AC, Lopes CA, Rossato M. Management of Plant Disease Epidemics with Irrigation Practices, Irrigation in Agroecosystems, Ondrašek G, IntechOpen; 2018. 10.5772/intechopen.78253 Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/irrigation-in-agroecosystems/management-of-plant-disease-epidemics-with-irrigation-practices [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mirko Di Febbraro

15 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-11197

Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rodríguez,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both referees are overall positive about the manuscript, although some important concerns have been raised about specific methodological aspects and the discussion of the main findings. Specifically, one of the referee suggested to explore more sophisticated modelling techniques (e.g. Boosted regression trees) to account for covariates interactions. In addition, the choice of environmental predictors has been judged inappropriate with respect of the spatial scale of the study. Even more importantly, the link between study results and species ecology was not adequately emphasized and discussed. I strongly suggest to take comprehensively into account such valuable suggestions, which can surely improve the overall quality of the study.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 29 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mirko Di Febbraro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

3.1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

3.2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this study I appreciated the attempt to investigate the correlation between climatic variables and the probability of occurrence V. dahliae pathogen by applying modelling and statistic approaches. Moreover, the results of your study may be very helpful to provide information about how irrigation could be better managed in order to modulate the effect of climate on fungus’s thrive and reduce the risk of pathogen’s spread.

Nevertheless, before I recommend this paper for publication, the authors should address some issues that I detected.

Introduction

- Line 47: I would write “in Andalusia (southern Spain) which is the world’s leading olive tree grower…”

Methods

- Line 139: A citation about the application of the Spearman rank-correlation is needed.

- Line 159: There are other studies that have investigated how climatic factors might affect the distribution of plant

pathogenic fungi, e.g.: Bosso, L., Luchi, N., Maresi, G., Cristinzio, G., Smeraldo, S., & Russo, D. (2017). Predicting current and future disease outbreaks of Diplodia sapinea shoot blight in Italy: species distribution models as a tool for forest management planning.

- Line 186: Please, clarify if you have used the Log Loss with presence-only test data.

- Line 198 and line 212: Please, remove citations from results session and eventually move them to discussion session.

- Lines 228-229: Authors should show the full results of log loss evaluation in supplementary materials.

Discussion

- Lines 236-237: Authors should specify why they use the term “sophisticated” and “primary” for the different variables.

- Line 248: Please, a citation is needed.

- Lines 257-259: Authors say that irrigation mitigate the negative effect of isothermality on V. dahliae occurrence, however, if I have correctly understood, from fig.2 it results that the combination between isothermality and watering showed an increasing negative effect on occurrences. Please, could you better explain this sentence?

Reviewer #2: Dear authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript titled ‘Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain’. This manuscript presents a straightforward study, using species distribution modelling techniques to interrogate conditions potentially favourable to the studied organism. The methods used in this paper are simple but corrected executed. However, there is an argument to be made that with such comprehensive data and well-supported knowledge on drivers of occurrence, more nuanced techniques could be used to explore the research question further (e.g. boosted regression trees are especially suited for interrogating covariate interactions – given that interacting conditions are found to be very important, I think you should consider trying such models).

Furthermore, the study tries to interrogate landscape-scale drivers of species occurrence with broad WorldClim climatic variables. This is difficult, because climate effects are often more important/easily-observed on larger scales – one would imagine that monthly or even weekly temperature and precipitation averages may have a more pronounced effect on this scale. Even better, soil moisture instead of precipitation, and fine-grained terrain relief data, may also prove to be important to the species, based on previous research highlighted in this manuscript. If possible, the authors should consider using these variables instead of WorldClim.

I find the conclusions in this study not fully supported by its results – the authors discussed management implications based on previous research and knowledge around the species, but the link between those discussions and the result in this study requires contextual and confirmatory knowledge of the species’ ecology. I strongly suggest including additional results, such as response curves and prediction maps, to further explain what precise environmental conditions are predicted to be favourable by the model.

Please find below a list of specific comments, in relation to line #

#44 this sentence can be shortened and merged with the previous

#86 considering the amount of available data per taxa, pathogenic species are not particularly under-represented in species distribution modelling, see e.g. 10.1016/j.fbr.2020.01.002 for a summary

#146-147 depending on the size of groves, within-grove climatic variations could be important and considered as a covariate

#150 it appears that ‘covariate’ is used to refer to factor variables in this manuscript, I suggest using only ‘covariate’ or ‘variable’ to refer to all predictors, as commonly practised by the species distribution modelling community

#188-189 are the data partitions sampled with replacement? Why not a standard 10-fold CV (dividing data into 10 distinct blocks and using 9 to train and 1 to test)

#231 I think these supplementary figures help readers a lot – mapped rasters of all continuous predictors can also be included in the Appendix, to better contextualise the environment in the study area

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Mirko Di Febbraro

23 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-11197R1

Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Rodríguez,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

One of the referees still highlighted a couple of minor amendments that need to be done in the manuscript. I am more than confident you will handle them very quickly.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 07 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mirko Di Febbraro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I congratulate with the authors for the excellent work. All my comments have been successfully addressed.

Reviewer #2: Dear authors,

Thank you for the opportunity to re-review the manuscript titled ‘Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas

of southern Spain’. I am satisfied with the authors’ responses to the recommendations I raised in the first round. I believe this manuscript is now robust and valuable, with only a few minor tweaks, it can make a nice addition to the journal.

Although the changes from the previous version are not substantial, I am convinced by the authors’ responses to my previous comments, which demonstrated their comprehensive knowledge of the study system and I can now better appreciate the reasonings behind their conclusions. Below I detail my updated views on the concerns I raised in my previous review.

Regarding trialling more complicated modelling method: I am impressed that the authors fitted BRTs with multiple sets of parameters, and tested model performance rigorously. I think this result (that GLMs beat BRTs in performance) is worth mentioning in the text, or at least in an appendix, because other model-focused readers may also be interested in whether different modelling methods are tried for this research problem.

Regarding choice of covariates: I am convinced by the authors’ response that the covariates tried here are most suited to the study. Although I am still wondering whether seasonal and/or monthly climate data should be tested, since the authors identified that warm and wet conditions are most imported to V.dahliae, so maybe the specific susceptible month(s) are worth focusing on.

Regarding better contextualising the favourable conditions to V.dahliae: I think the new appendix maps of predictors will suffice, and I agree with the authors that occurrence prediction maps are not needed for this study.

I have a few other minor suggestions:

In table 1, I am not sure whether the hypothesis column is necessary, I believe the information is better conveyed in text, through a more detailed elaboration on how the top models supported the specific hypothesis.

Line 245: I suggest “compound” or “composite” over “sophisticated”, but I agree with the “primary” wording.

Line 286-290: I think the observed effect of plant nursery origin in the model deserves more discussion. Although it is beyond the scope of this study, it hints that non-climatic factors are also significant in moderating disease risk, this is worthwhile knowing from a management perspective.

Appendix S2: the colour scale on the last figure is confusing (it looks intuitively like a value that ranges from 0 to 1), I suggest changing it.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Mirko Di Febbraro

14 Dec 2020

Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain

PONE-D-20-11197R2

Dear Dr. Rodríguez,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mirko Di Febbraro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mirko Di Febbraro

17 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-11197R2

Climatic drivers of Verticillium dahliae occurrence in Mediterranean olive-growing areas of southern Spain  

Dear Dr. Rodríguez:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mirko Di Febbraro

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Comparison of model fit when including interaction terms between climatic variables and covariates.

    Each pairwise interaction was separately included in the top-ranked model for V. dahliae occurrence (see Table 1 in the main manuscript). We ordered the models by their AIC values and checked whether the interaction term was significant or not.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Comparison between the top-ranked model and the intercept-only model using 10-fold cross-validation.

    The performance of the models was evaluated using the Log‐Loss. Lower values of this model selection index indicate better model performance. Performance measures were averaged throughout the ten data partitions. Improvement was calculated as [(Top-ranked—Only-intercept) / Only-intercept] * 100. Each data partition was made by randomly splitting the data into 10 distinct blocks and using 9 to train and 1 to test.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Map of WorldClim climatic variables averaged for the years 1970–2000 in Granada province (southern Spain).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Analysis of the top-ranked model residuals.

    (a) Bubble plot of the standardized residuals from the top-ranked model (see Table 1 in the main manuscript) including an interaction term between isothermality and watering. (b) Spline correlogram of the residuals using the function spline.correlog in the “ncf” R package [1]. The spatial dependence is tested as a continuous function of distance. The gray shadows represent the 95% confidence interval.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Appendix. Comparison between boosted regression trees and binomial models for V. dahliae occurrence.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers (2).docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data are available from the GitHub repository (https://github.com/jmrmcode/Verticillium-wilt-Dataset.git).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES