Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;11(6):e02582-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02582-20

TABLE 1.

Significant effects of neonatal gut metabolites on C. parvum growth

Rank order of fold changea Metabolite name Concn (mM) Avg growth ratio (mean ± SD)b P value
11 Docosahexaenoic acid 0.1 1.44 ± 0.29 <0.0001
18 Linolenic acid 0.5 1.40 ± 0.02 <0.0001
13 Linoleic acid 0.5 1.33 ± 0.07 <0.0001
35 Dihydroxyacetone 0.5 1.22 ± 0.05 <0.0001
42 Behenic acid 0.02 1.22 ± 0.08 0.0003
31 Hexadecane 0.5 1.20 ± 0.07 0.0002
41 Benzylalcohol 0.5 1.19 ± 0.22 0.0006
34 N-acetyl-d-mannosamine 0.5 1.19 ± 0.10 0.0006
32 Pentadecanoic acid 0.1 1.18 ± 0.11 0.0009
23 Glucose-6-phosphate 0.5 1.18 ± 0.35 0.0022
17 Diphosphoric acid 0.5 1.16 ± 0.24 0.0089
20 Nicotinamide 0.5 1.15 ± 0.15 0.0150
29 Maltose 0.5 1.14 ± 0.12 0.0310
27 UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 0.5 1.14 ± 0.22 0.0390
15 Oxamic acid 0.5 1.13 ± 0.07 0.0488
10 1-Monostearin 0.5 0.78 ± 0.13 <0.0001
2 1-Monopalmitin 0.1 0.77 ± 0.21 <0.0001
19 Palmitic acid 0.1 0.77 ± 0.07 <0.0001
5 Myristic acid 0.5 0.68 ± 0.16 <0.0001
6 Lauric acid 0.5 0.61 ± 0.08 <0.0001
1 Monomyristin 0.5 0.59 ± 0.08 <0.0001
14 Capric acid 0.5 0.32 ± 0.07 <0.0001
a

Rank order of metabolites by fold change in abundance from week 1 to week 3 as shown in Table S1.

b

Ratio of C. parvum growth relative to the DMSO control averaged across three independent experiments, with two to three technical replicates per experiment, as shown in Fig. 3. Two way ANOVA with Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons.