Abstract
Herein, we successfully synthesized a series of LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) and LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs by modifying the amount of NaOH and the reaction time. Hexagonal LaF3 nanocrystals with uniform particle sizes and bright UC emissions were obtained. The crystal structures of the lanthanide-doped LaF3 UCNPs were investigated using wide-angle X-ray diffraction. The morphologies and particle sizes of the nanocrystals were determined using transmission electron microscopy. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the LaF3 nanocrystals could be tuned by altering the doping ratio of Er3+, Ho3+, and Tm3+. In addition, the PL intensities increased after coating the UCNP cores with an active shell. The fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs synthesized via a one-hour reaction with the addition of 2.5 or 5 mmol NaOH increased by up to 17 times compared with the sample prepared without the addition of NaOH. By modifying the doping ratio of Yb/Tm, UV-emissive LaF3 nanocrystals were obtained. After surface modification by ligand exchange, the hydrophobic LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs became water-dispersible. These colloid UCNPs could be utilized as a fluorescent probe for the detection of Hg2+ ions under 980 nm near-infrared irradiation.
Keywords: LaF3, core/shell, UCNP, hexagonal, ligand exchange
1. Introduction
In recent years, lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted significant attention due to their extensive applications in various fields, such as catalysis, electronics, and biomedicine [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Upconversion (UC) is a nonlinear optical process characterized by the sequential absorption of multiple photons for high-energy anti-Stokes emission. Lanthanide-doped UCNPs are dilute guest–host materials that can convert near-infrared (NIR) light into higher-energy ultraviolet, visible, or NIR luminescence [8,9]. For this type of UCNP, trivalent lanthanide ions are typically used as guest ions in appropriate dielectric host lattices with dimensions of less than 100 nm.
Owing to the 4f inner shell configuration of trivalent lanthanide ions, lanthanide-doped UCNPs with abundant and unique energy levels can exhibit numerous distinctive characteristics, including narrow emission bandwidths, long lifetimes, high resistance to photobleaching, large anti-Stokes shifts, superior photostability, and high tissue penetration depths [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,10,11]. In addition, the intensity and wavelength of UC luminescence can be adjusted by changing the lanthanide dopants and the host matrix [1,2,6]. Due to the favorable abovementioned properties, lanthanide-doped UCNPs have immense potential for biological applications [1,3,4,7,12].
The selection of appropriate host materials is crucial to obtain UCNPs that can exhibit high-efficiency emissions by reducing the nonradiative rate. Hence, the incorporation of lanthanide ions into dielectric host materials with very low-frequency phonons has attracted substantial interest. Among the hosts investigated thus far, fluoride materials have the lowest phonon cutoff energy and typically the highest UC efficiency. Lanthanide-doped rare-earth fluoride nanoparticles exhibit unique UC luminescence properties under 980 nm NIR irradiation.
Recently, rare-earth fluorides, such as binary REF3 and ternary AREF4 (RE = rare-earth, A = alkali) compounds, have attracted considerable attention because they are excellent luminescent host matrices for optically active Ln3+ ions [1,2,6,13,14]. Due to the exceptionally low vibration energy arising from the high ionicity of the La–F bond, LaF3 is considered as a promising host matrix for both, down- and UC fluorescence [13,15,16,17,18]. In particular, LaF3 host materials can suppress the nonradiative loss of photon energy to achieve a high quantum efficiency of luminescence.
Recently, to produce small and well-defined LaF3 nanocrystals for biological applications, the controlled synthesis of LaF3 nanoparticles has been widely studied. LaF3 nanocrystals with good uniformity and shape cannot be obtained by synthetic methods, including the hydrothermal route and molten salt synthesis [18,19,20,21]. In particular, no significant improvement in the fluorescence of LaF3 has been achieved [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Yan et al. reported a kind of LaF3 nanoplates with high uniformity [26]. Although these nanoplates possessed a well-defined structure and high uniformity, the products were inactive under UC luminescence. For in vivo bioimaging applications, the luminescent nanocrystals must meet certain essential requirements, such as small particle size and high brightness at NIR excitation wavelengths [2,4,27,28,29,30].
However, the most effective UC hosts, such as NaYF4, have a large size above 20 nm; this makes them difficult to be cleaned out from the body, thus limiting their applications in many biomedical fields [27,28]. In addition, although LaF3 nanocrystals have long been considered as effective UC host materials, LaF3 nanoparticles synthesized using several methods usually exhibit a plate-shaped morphology with a large size of 20–50 nm [23,24,25,31]. Therefore, the synthesis of lanthanide-doped LaF3 UCNPs with a uniformly small size and desirable luminescence properties remains a challenge.
In 2013, Bao et al. fabricated uniform LaF3 nanocrystals with polyhedral, nanorod, and nanoplate shapes by adjusting the amount of NaOH and/or capping ligands. By doping lanthanide ions into these LaF3 NPs, satisfactory UC emission results were obtained [32]. However, in this study, only two types of UCNPs, that is, single-doped and core-type UCNPs, were prepared and studied, and their crystal structures remained unsatisfactory. Consequently, extensive study by researchers is underway for the fabrication of LaF3 UCNPs with a hexagonal prism structure, uniform size, and bright UC luminescence.
Alternatively, because mercuric ions (Hg2+) are toxic to human health and the environment, it is imperative to develop an efficient and highly sensitive approach for the detection of Hg2+. As a result, the applications of NIR-based chemosensors in bioanalysis, such as in the detection of Hg2+, have recently attracted considerable attention owing to the high detection sensitivity of these chemosensors [33,34].
To the best of our knowledge, few studies have reported the synthesis of uniform hexagonal lanthanide-doped core/shell LaF3 UCNPs with bright UC luminescence. In this study, we successfully synthesized Yb/Er co-doped LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs via a thermal decomposition method by modifying the amount of NaOH and the reaction time. In addition, a series of LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ UCNPs were prepared for comparison. An active core/active shell strategy was adopted to restrain surface-related deactivations and intensify the energy-transfer UC of the LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+@LaF3:Yb3+ core/shell UCNPs [35,36,37]. The crystal structure, particle size, and morphology of the core UCNPs and core/shell UCNPs were evaluated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The emission spectrum and photoluminescence (PL) efficiency of the core UCNPs and core/shell UCNPs were investigated using a 980 nm NIR laser. The oleate-capped LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs were further modified with hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG), and the resulting PEG-modified core/shell nanoparticles were used as chemosensors for the detection of Hg2+ under NIR irradiation.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Materials
The synthesis was carried out using standard oxygen-free procedures and commercially available reagents. La2O3 (99.99%), Yb2O3 (99.99%), Er2O3 (99.99%), Ho2O3 (99.99%), Tm2O3 (99.99%), CF3COOH (99.99%), oleic acid (90%), octadecene (90%), HgCl2 (98%), and glutathione (98%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA) and used without any further purification. NaOH (99.99%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals used were of reagent grade.
2.2. Synthesis of LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ UCNPs and LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+@LaF3:Yb3+ Core/Shell UCNPs
Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+-co-doped LaF3 UCNPs were synthesized by the thermal decomposition approach. By adjusting the amount of NaOH and reaction time, a series of LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ UCNPs were prepared using lanthanide oxides and trifluoroacetate precursors in the presence of oleic acid as a coordinating ligand and 1-octadecene as a noncoordinating solvent. The typical synthesis procedure of LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+@ LaF3:Yb3+ UCNPs was as follows: 0.78 mmol La2O3, 0.20 mmol Yb2O3, and 0.02 mmol Er2O3 were dissolved in 50% trifluoroacetic acid in a three-necked flask at 90 °C. Subsequently, a certain amount of NaOH was added to the abovementioned solution, and the resulting solution was evaporated to dryness under an argon gas purge.
Next, 15 mL of oleic acid and 15 mL of 1-octadecene were added to the resulting solution in a three-necked flask followed by heating to 120 °C under magnetic stirring for 30 min to remove water and oxygen. A light-yellow solution was obtained, which was then heated to 320 °C at a rate of approximately 20 °C/min−1 under argon gas protection and maintained at 320 °C under vigorous stirring for approximately 1 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature (RT) and precipitated with ethanol. The solid was collected by centrifugation, dispersed in hexane, and reprecipitated using ethanol twice to obtain the oleate-capped LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+ core UCNPs. The LaF3:Yb3+ shell was developed in a similar manner except that only 0.80 mmol La2O3 and 0.20 mmol Yb2O3 were used to achieve the oleate-capped LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs.
2.3. Synthesis of PEG–Imidazole
The synthesis of PEG–imidazole was described in our previous study [38]. Briefly, a certain amount of CH3-PEG-COOH (MW: 5000 g/mol) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) under argon protection. Subsequently, a mixture of N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide, histamine, and N-hydroxysuccinimide in DMF was added to the flask containing the abovementioned solution followed by heating to 75 °C. After a day of reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered to remove the solvent and recrystallized using ethanol/ether to obtain the purified product.
2.4. Preparation of Hydrophilic UCNPs via Ligand Exchange with PEG–Imidazole
A LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNP solution was mixed with the PEG–imidazole solution in chloroform at RT under vigorous stirring for 30 min. Next, a mixture of ethanol/hexane (1:4, v/v) was added to the abovementioned solution to produce precipitates, which were collected by filtration and then dissolved in phosphate buffer. The PEG-capped core/shell UCNPs were filtered and obtained using a polyethersulfone membrane with 0.2 µm pore size followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min.
2.5. Assay for the Detection of Hg2+
The experiment for the detection of Hg2+ was conducted as follows. Typically, 100 mg as-synthesized UCNPs were dissolved in 250 mL of 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid buffer (0.1 M, pH = 6.0) at RT followed by the addition of a calculated amount of HgCl2 to produce 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mg/L Hg2+ solutions. Under 980 nm NIR irradiation, luminescence quenching spectra were obtained for each concentration. After the addition of glutathione (GSH) to the 0.8 mg/L Hg2+ solution, fluorescence emission measurements were performed in a similar manner. A calculated amount of GSH was dissolved in DMF to produce 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mg/mL GSH solutions. After separately adding the GSH solution at each concentration to the 0.8 mg/mL Hg2+ solution, fluorescence emission spectra were acquired for each case.
2.6. Characterization
Wide-angle X-ray diffractograms (WAXD) were obtained using a Bruker D8 (Bruker Axs GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) ADVANCE diffractometer using CuKα radiation with a step size of 0.05° and a scanning speed of 4°/min. TEM images were acquired using a JEOL JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) PL spectra were obtained using a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The emission spectra of the nanocrystals were obtained under 980 nm NIR excitation using a SDL-980-LM-5000T laser diode (980 nm, 3 W/cm2, Shanghai Dream Lasers Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis of LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 core UCNPs
As the thermal decomposition method is considered the best method for the controlled synthesis of highly monodisperse nanoparticles with well-defined nanostructures [39], the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 core UCNPs and LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs were prepared via this approach. However, our preliminary study indicated that the LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+ core UCNPs synthesized by the thermal decomposition approach did not exhibit good morphology, crystal structure, and luminescence properties. Therefore, we attempted to optimize several reaction parameters to improve the quality of the synthesized LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+ core UCNPs. A significant improvement in the quality of the synthesized UCNPs was achieved after adjusting the precursor solution. The addition of NaOH to the precursor solution yielded good results; therefore, initially, we explored the optimal reaction parameters for the synthesis of the LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+ core UCNPs.
Based on our previous study on the synthesis of lanthanide-doped LiYF4-type UCNPs, we adopted a fixed ratio of LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 and increased the reaction temperature to 320 °C. The synthesized core UCNPs were characterized by XRD, TEM, and PL spectroscopy for comparison. Herein, five experimental conditions were selected, and the results were compared: 1 h reaction without NaOH (the control sample), 2.5 mmol NaOH and 30 min reaction, 5.0 mmol NaOH and 30 min reaction, 2.5 mmol NaOH and 1 h reaction, and 5.0 mmol NaOH and 1 h reaction.
For the addition of NaOH, we referred to the above-mentioned article [32] and presumed that the pH value could change the exact amount of CF3COO− ions in the solution. The increase of NaOH amount would accelerate the release of CF3COO− ions, and the fast provision of CF3COO− ions could accelerate the growth of LaF3 nanocrystals. However, we found that too much NaOH and/or a longer reaction time would induce the formation of other impurities. Therefore, in our study when the amount of NaOH was increased up to 2.5 mmol and the reaction was run for one hour, some β-NaYbF4 was also formed, i.e., a mixture of LaF3 and β-NaYbF4 was produced. With further increasing the amount of NaOH up to 5.0 mmol and the reaction time for one hour, more β-NaYbF4 impurity was yielded. This implies that too much NaOH and/or a longer reaction time produces impurities in this system. Therefore, both the suitable amount of NaOH and reaction time are necessary to fine-tune to acquire the LaF3 type UCNPs.
3.2. XRD of LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs
To understand the effect of different experimental parameters on the crystal structure of the UCNPs, we employed XRD to determine the phase structure of the synthesized UCNPs. As shown in Figure 1, the diffraction peaks corresponding to the (002), (110), (111), (112), (211), (300), (113), (302), (221), (114), (223), (304), (115), and (411) planes of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs closely match the standard peaks of LaF3 (JCPDS No. 32-0483), confirming the successful synthesis of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs with a hexagonal crystal structure. The particle size was calculated using the Scherrer equation: , where Dhkl is the mean crystallite size along the [hkl] direction, K is the shape factor, λ is the X-ray wavelength, βhkl is the line breadth (usually taken as the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of an (hkl) diffraction), and θ is the Bragg angle. The upper two sharp diffraction patterns indicate that the UCNPs synthesized under both the designated synthetic conditions were well crystallized; however, the pattern of the trace by-product β-NaYbF4 was also present.
In the lowest pattern acquired for the case when the reaction was performed for 1 h without NaOH, the obtained diffraction peaks exhibited broader FWHMs, indicating a smaller crystallite size of the resulting UCNPs. After the addition of NaOH to the reaction mixture, the FWHM of the diffraction peaks became narrower, the crystallites (also referred to as grains) became larger, and the morphology of the crystal structure was improved. On the other hand, for the case where a fixed amount of NaOH was added, we observed that the longer the reaction time, the smaller the FWHM of the diffraction peak, implying the formation of bigger crystallites.
After adding NaOH and performing the reaction for 1 h, additional diffraction peaks appeared in the XRD patterns. We compared these XRD patterns with those of the possible byproducts using the information from the database and found that the additional diffraction peaks originated from the β-NaYbF4 crystal (JCPDS No. 27-1427). β-NaYbF4 showed a similar crystal structure (hexagonal) and UC emission spectra to those of LaF3-type nanoparticles, which have been reported in relevant studies [40,41,42]. Therefore, β-NaYbF4 would not affect the crystal morphology and peak positions of the UC emissions of the LaF3 UCNPs, as confirmed in the following section based on the PL spectra (Figure 4).
Based on the abovementioned results, we speculated that the addition of NaOH to the precursor solution facilitated the dissociation of CF3COOH and produced CF3COONa such that more CF3COO− in the solution could participate in the formation reaction of LaF3. Hence, the growth rate of the LaF3 crystallites was promoted, leading to a more uniform phase structure of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs. In addition, with an increase in reaction time, more uniform and larger grains were formed. However, because of the presence of Na+ in the solution, some β-NaYbF4 was also formed.
3.3. Crystal Morphology of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs
Subsequently, the effects of different reaction parameters on the crystal morphology of the UCNPs were investigated using TEM. Figure 2a,b shows the bright-field TEM image obtained with 60,000× magnification and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image obtained with 200,000× magnification for the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs synthesized by a one-hour reaction without the addition of NaOH. Figure 2c,e,g,i presents the bright-field TEM images of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs synthesized using 2.5 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 30 min, 2.5 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 1 h, 5.0 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 30 min, and 5.0 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 1 h, respectively. The corresponding HRTEM images obtained with 300,000× magnification are shown in Figure 2d,f,h,j. All these images show that the synthesized UCNPs were single-crystal particles, and, owing to the coordination of long-chain oleic acid molecules on the crystal surface, van der Waals forces allow these UCNPs to be close-packed while being well separated from each other. As all the synthesized UCNPs are arranged in a random, isotropic manner, the TEM images (Figure 2) show a mixed type of hexagonal, rectangular, and irregular prism-like structures, confirming the formation of hexagonal-phase LaF3.
Figure 2a shows that the UCNPs obtained after 1 h of the thermal decomposition reaction without adding NaOH had a mixed type of structure, as mentioned above. In Figure 2a, “side-to-side” and “face-to-face” patterns were observed, indicating that the LaF3 crystals were arranged in a random assembly. As observed in this figure, some of the UCNPs are in the form of thin nanoplates arranged in a “face-to-face” manner; moreover, these nanoplates are hexagonal in shape when viewed from their frontal planes. This can be attributed to the fact that the synthesized UCNPs have small prism thicknesses, and, from the side view, these hexagonal prisms appear like thin plates, with a mean edge length of 16.6 ± 2.0 nm and a mean thickness of 1.4 ± 1.0 nm.
As shown in Figure 2b, the lattice spacing was approximately 0.37 nm, which corresponds to the (002) plane of hexagonal LaF3 (JCPDS No. 32-0483). Subsequently, after adding 2.5 mmol NaOH followed by the thermal decomposition reaction for 30 min, more uniform hexagonal prismatic UCNPs began to appear, and the mean side length of the hexagon was approximately 7.1 ± 2.0 nm (Figure 2c). As presented in Figure 2d, the measured lattice spacing was approximately 0.35 nm, which corresponds to the (110) plane of hexagonal LaF3 (according to the JCPDS No. 32-0483).
Figure 2e shows that, after adding 5.0 mmol NaOH followed by the thermal decomposition reaction for 30 min, hexagonal prismatic UCNPs with a large particle size distribution were formed. The hexagonal side length was ca. 7.5 ± 2.0 nm, and the prism height was approximately 10.5 ± 1.0 nm. Figure 2f shows the basal planes and side planes (inset) of the LaF3 hexagonal prism crystals. The lattice spacing of the basal planes was measured to be approximately 0.35 nm, which corresponded to the (110) plane of hexagonal LaF3. On the other hand, the lattice spacing of the (002) plane (inset) of hexagonal LaF3 was approximately 0.37 nm.
Figure 2g shows that, after adding 2.5 mmol NaOH followed by 1 h reaction, hexagonal prismatic UCNPs with a uniform particle size were obtained. The mean side length of the hexagon was approximately 9.4 ± 1.0 nm, and the prism height was approximately 11.7 ± 1.0 nm. As shown in Figure 2h, the lattice spacing was approximately 0.35 nm, which also corresponds to the (110) plane of hexagonal LaF3. Figure 2i shows that after adding 5.0 mmol NaOH followed by the thermal decomposition reaction for 1 h, hexagonal prismatic UCNPs with larger sizes were achieved, indicating that the LaF3 crystals grew continuously under these conditions.
The side length of the hexagonal prism was approximately 10.0 ± 1.5 nm and the prism height was approximately 15.2 ± 2.0 nm. Due to the better uniformity of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 core UCNPs synthesized by adding 2.5 mmol NaOH followed by reaction for 1 h, we used these UCNPs as the representative UCNPs during selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) to confirm that the synthesized UCNPs had a single-crystal structure (Figure 3); moreover, the spots of the diffraction rings were indexed to the (hkl) planes of the XRD pattern according to the standard JCPDS No. 32-0483.
From the abovementioned results, we found that the addition amount of NaOH was the key factor affecting the growth rate of the LaF3 grains along the (110) and (002) planes, and there was a competition between the growth of the grains along these lattice planes. The grain growth along the (110) plane can be attributed to an increase in the prism height, while the grain growth along the (002) plane indicates an increase in the side length and surface area of the basal plane of the hexagonal prism. These grain growths agree with the peak heights in the corresponding XRD patterns.
In addition, the reaction time affected the synthesis of the LaF3 UCNPs, and a reaction time of 1 h resulted in the formation of more uniform and larger hexagonal crystals, as shown in Figure 2g,i. By comparing the results obtained by XRD and TEM, we speculated that the addition of NaOH would cause the dissociation of more CF3COOH in the precursor solution, and accordingly, primitive LaF3 grains were observed to grow along the (110) direction (base plane), thereby, rapidly increasing the surface area of the (002) plane. Consequently, as more CF3COO− ions were attached to the (002) plane and participated in the reaction, the surface area of the LaF3 grains along the (002) plane increased, as evident from Figure 2a,c.
Hence, by comparing the lower two XRD patterns shown in Figure 1, we observed that the peak of the (002) plane emerged after adding NaOH to the reaction mixture. By comparing Figure 2c,e, we observed that, after adding up to 5.0 mmol NaOH, more uniform and larger hexagonal crystals were produced, which agrees with the FWHM values and XRD patterns shown in Figure 1.
On the other hand, compared to the case of Figure 2c, when the amount of NaOH was kept constant and the reaction time was increased to 1 h, the growth of the crystals was promoted, resulting in crystals with better uniformity and a more defined crystal structure as shown in Figure 2g. However, when the reaction time was kept constant at 1 h and the amount of NaOH was increased up to 5.0 mmol, the growth rate of each LaF3 crystallite in the solution significantly varied because of the participation of more CF3COO− ions in the reaction. As a result, compared to the case of Figure 2g, the crystals grew larger, and the particle size distribution also became larger, as shown in Figure 2i.
3.4. Optical Properties of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs
To understand the luminescence properties of the UCNPs synthesized under different conditions, we dispersed 1 mg of UCNPs in a 2 mL mixture of n-hexane/ethanol (1:1, v/v) and analyzed the resulting solution using a fluorescence spectrometer. Figure 4 shows the PL spectra of the UCNPs obtained under the abovementioned five reaction conditions and 3 W/cm2 980 nm laser irradiation. All five samples exhibited characteristic luminescence in the green and red regions. The characteristic emission peaks at 523, 542, and 656 nm were attributed to 2H11/2→4I15/2, 4S3/2→4I15/2, and 4F9/2→4I15/2 transitions, respectively, caused by the doping of Er3+.
The fluorescence intensity of the control sample was the lowest among those of the five samples. The fluorescence intensities of the samples synthesized using 2.5 and 5 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 30 min were high, approximately three to six times that of the control sample, and the fluorescence intensity of the sample prepared using 5 mmol NaOH was slightly higher than that of the sample prepared using 2.5 mmol NaOH. The fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs synthesized by the 1 h reaction with the addition of 2.5 and 5 mmol NaOH were significantly high, approximately 17 times that of the control sample. Most importantly, from Figure 4, under the abovementioned two synthetic conditions, the positions of the characteristic emission peaks did not change because β-NaYbF4 exhibited UC emission peaks similar to those of the LaF3 nanocrystals [40,41,42].
The increase in the fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs can be explained based on the XRD and TEM results. The fluorescence principle of UCNPs is based on an energy-transfer UC process, in which a sensitizer (Yb3+ in this case) absorbs a pump photon and is excited from the ground state to its metastable energy level. The harvested energy of the sensitizer is then transferred to the ground state and the excited state of the activator (Er3+ in the present case). Subsequently, the transferred energy excites the activator to its upper emitting state, and the sensitizer returns to the ground state twice [43].
The energy is released in the form of light. Hence, the defects in the LaF3 host material have a considerable influence on the fluorescence efficiency of UCNPs. As observed in Figure 1, the XRD peaks of the UCNPs formed by the addition of NaOH exhibit a narrower FWHM, which indicates that the as-prepared UCNPs are larger, and more defined grains and fewer surface defects can avoid slight energy losses during the energy transfer. As observed in Figure 2, the morphology of the UCNPs synthesized by the reaction involving the addition of NaOH changed from the original plate shape to a hexagonal prism shape. This may suggest that because of the reduction in the specific surface area of these UCNPs, the loss of energy from the surface decreases.
As the fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs obtained using 2.5 and 5 mmol NaOH followed by the reaction for 1 h were similar, and the UCNPs achieved using 2.5 mmol NaOH possessed a relatively uniform particle size, defined morphology, and pristine crystal structure, we used these reaction conditions to synthesize the other seven types of UCNPs. For comparison, the reaction parameters and the doping compositions for the eight kinds of UCNPs are listed in Table 1, and their corresponding PL spectra are shown in Figure 5.
Table 1.
Nanoparticle Samples | Ion Concentration (mmol) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yb3+ | Er3+ | Ho3+ | Tm3+ | ||
No. 1 | LaF3:/ | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
No. 2 | LaF3:/ | 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 |
No. 3 | LaF3:/ | 0.20 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 |
No. 4 | LaF3:// | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 |
No. 5 | LaF3:// | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 |
No. 6 | LaF3:// | 0.20 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
No. 7 | LaF3:/// | 0.20 | 0.0067 | 0.0067 | 0.0067 |
No. 8 | LaF3:/ | 0.30 | 0 | 0 | 0.005 |
Figure 5a shows the PL spectra of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 UCNPs with green fluorescence at 523 and 542 nm and red fluorescence at 656 nm, resulting from the 2H11/2→4I15/2 (523 nm), 4S3/2→4I15/2 (542 nm), and 4F9/2→4I15/2 (656 nm) transitions of Er3+. The mixed emission appeared orange. The luminescence characteristics of LaF3 single-doped with Tm3+ were due to 3F3→3H6 (700 nm) and 3H4→3H6 (800 nm) transitions, as shown in Figure 5b. The mixed red and infrared emissions appeared magenta (inset). In the case of LaF3 single-doped with Ho3+, the characteristic emission peaks originated from 5S2/5F4→5I8 (542 nm) and 5F5→5I8 (645 nm) transitions (Figure 5c), and the mixed emission appeared light green (inset). By comparing Figure 5a,c, we suggest that the dopant Ho3+ leads to green fluorescence, while the dopant Er3+ results in green and red fluorescence.
Next, the effect of multiple doping (Er3+, Ho3+, and Tm3+) on the PL spectra of the UCNPs was investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 5d–g. The Er3+/Tm3+, Er3+/Ho3+, and Tm3+/ Ho3+ double-doped UCNPs exhibited green, green–pink, and magenta emissions, respectively, resulting from the mixing of their respective emissions. For the Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ tri-doped UCNPs, three emission peaks (green, red, and infrared) were observed, and the emitted light was green.
More importantly, to synthesize a kind of UCNPs that can emit UV light and can be applied as a trigger for photoresponsive materials, some preliminary experiments were conducted. As our previous study indicated that UV-emissive LiYF4-type UCNPs can be obtained by the single doping of Tm3+ [38,44], we optimized the doping concentrations of Yb3+ and Tm3+ to synthesize LaF3 UCNPs with luminescence characteristics in the UV region. As the UC emission is strongly related to the cross-relaxation of the doping ions, we increased the concentration of Yb3+ (sensitizer) and decreased the concentration of Tm3+ (activator) based on the doping concentrations shown in Figure 5b.
Consequently, UV-emissive UCNPs were successfully synthesized, as shown in Figure 5h. As shown in Figure 5h, the characteristic peaks of UV emission at 361 nm, blue emission at 451 nm and 477 nm, and red emission at 647 nm and 698 nm originated from 1D2→3H6, 1D2→3F4, and 1G4→3H6, and 1G4→3F4 and 3F3→3H6 transitions of Tm3+, respectively. The inset showed blue emission. Although the intensity of the UV peak was lower than those of the other visible peaks, these UCNPs can still be used to trigger photoresponsive materials for applications, such as controlled drug release [44].
3.5. Structural, Morphological, and Optical Properties of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@ LaF3:Yb3+0.20 Core/Shell UCNPs
As mentioned above, because the core UCNPs prepared using 2.5 mmol NaOH followed by the reaction for 1 h showed a relatively uniform particle size, high fluorescence intensity, defined morphology, and pristine crystal structure, we used these reaction conditions to synthesize LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs. For comparison, the XRD patterns, TEM images, and PL spectra of the LaF3-type core UCNPs and core/shell UCNPs are shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively.
Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 core UCNPs and the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs. As observed in the figure, the positions of the diffraction peaks before and after the shell coverage are approximately the same, and both UCNPs had hexagonal crystal structures. After coating the core UCNPs with the shell, the FWHMs of the diffraction peaks became narrower, which indicated a larger particle size and crystal growth of the core/shell UCNPs. Although the diffraction peaks of β-NaYbF4 were also observed, the formation of β-NaYbF4 did not affect the PL spectrum of the LaF3 UCNPs, as stated above. The XRD results confirmed the grain growth and successful shell coverage of the core UCNPs.
Figure 7 shows the TEM images of the core UCNPs and core/shell UCNPs at 80,000× magnification. After coating the core UCNPs with the LaF3:Yb3+ shell, both the side length of the hexagon and the prism height for the core UCNPs significantly increased. Before shell coverage, the mean side length of the hexagon was approximately 9.4 ± 1.0 nm, and the prism height was approximately 11.7 ± 1.0 nm. After shell coverage, the mean side length of the hexagon was approximately 13.5 ± 2.0 nm, and the prism height was ca. 15.6 ± 1.0 nm. The TEM results confirmed that, after shell coverage, the particle size of the UCNPs increased, and core/shell-type UCNPs were successfully synthesized.
Figure 8 shows the PL spectra of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02 core UCNPs and LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs. As shown in Figure 8, the fluorescence intensities of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs increased in both the green and red regions, after shell coverage; this may be because the reduction in the surface defects of UCNPs led to a decrease in the energy loss during energy transfer.
3.6. Detection of Hg2+ in Aqueous Media
To detect Hg2+ in an aqueous environment, the hydrophobic UCNPs must be converted into hydrophilic colloids via a surface modification approach. As the as-synthesized oleate-capped UCNPs were hydrophobic, they could not be readily dispersed in aqueous solutions. Therefore, the utilization of surface modification techniques was imperative to make these UCNPs water-dispersible for aqueous applications. As PEG exhibits strong hydrophilicity, PEG–imidazole was synthesized and used as a hydrophilic ligand to modify the surfaces of UCNPs via ligand exchange [45,46,47].
The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of oleate-capped UCNPs and PEG-imidazole capped UCNPs are shown in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1). The dynamic light scattering (DLS) data of PEG-imidazole capped UCNPs is shown in Figure S2 (Supplementary Materials). After ligand exchange, the water dispersibility of the as-prepared UCNPs was substantially enhanced owing to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the water and oxygen atoms of the PEG chains. The imidazole moiety of PEG–imidazole possesses a pyrrolic nitrogen atom and a pyridinic nitrogen atom. The pyridinic nitrogen atom provided a lone pair of electrons for the coordination of PEG–imidazole to La3+ [48]. Consequently, after ligand exchange, the hydrophilic PEG segments were capped to the core/shell UCNPs, allowing the UCNPs to easily disperse in water.
Thus, the synthesized LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs can function as a chemosensor to detect Hg2+ in aqueous solutions. As the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs exhibited strong green emission, as illustrated in Figure 9, a sensitivity titration was carried out in aqueous media to obtain the standard curve for different Hg2+ concentrations in the range from 0 to 0.8 mg/L. After separately adding Hg2+ at each concentration to the UCNP solution and irradiating the resulting UCNP solutions with a 980 nm NIR laser, we observed that the intensities of all the emission peaks of UCNPs decreased with an increase in the Hg2+ concentration.
As shown in Figure 9a, upon increasing the concentration of Hg2+ for each addition, the intensities of the green and red emissions of UCNPs gradually decreased under 980 nm NIR irradiation, indicating that the present sensing system exhibited high sensitivity for the detection of Hg2+. Figure 9b shows a linear relationship between the intensity of UC emissions at approximately 540 nm and the Hg2+ concentration. Assuming that the intensity of the green emission band can be reliably detected to the amount as low as 0.1 mg/L based on the variation of the PL intensity and from the standard curve, it might be reasonable that the accepting detection level of Hg2+ ions is approximately 0.1 mg/L or 0.5 µM.
To employ the developed fluorescent sensor for the quantitative detection of GSH, further investigation was performed to analyze the fluorescence response of the UCNPs/Hg2+ system with the addition of GSH. We found that, after adding a certain amount of GSH to the UCNPs/Hg2+ system, the fluorescence intensity immediately recovered (Figure 9c). When the concentration of GSH was increased from 0 to 0.8 mg/mL, the fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs increased. Figure 9d shows a linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity of the UCNPs measured at approximately 540 nm and GSH concentration in the range from 0 to 0.8 mg/mL.
The results of Hg2+ sensing and fluorescence quenching can be explained according to the following phenomenon: when Hg2+ was present in close proximity to the UCNPs, UCNP–Hg2+ complexes were formed. The fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs decreased due to the formation of the UCNP–Hg2+ coordination complexes, which caused the static quenching of green emission via electron transfer from the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 UCNPs to Hg2+ [49,50,51,52]. The static quenching mechanism can result in linear Stern-Volmer plots as shown in Figure S3 of the Supplementary Materials.
Except for the electron transfer, the ion-bonding may lead to PL quenching; however, the former effect may play a more important role [50]. Upon increasing the loading of Hg2+, the fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs decreased, whereas the fluorescence quenching increased. However, the fluorescence intensity could be recovered after adding a certain amount of GSH to the UCNPs/Hg2+ solution. As GHS and Hg2+ formed a stable Hg–S bond [53,54], the UCNP–Hg2+ coordination complexes were removed, leading to the recovery of the fluorescence intensity.
4. Conclusions
In this study, various hexagonal-phase LaF3:Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+ UCNPs were prepared by single-doping, double-doping, and triple-doping LaF3:Yb3+ using UC lanthanide ions via the thermal decomposition approach. In particular, LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs with a hexagonal prism structure, a uniform size, and bright UC luminescence were obtained. The effects of the amount of NaOH and reaction time on the crystal structure and particle size of these UCNPs were studied in detail. By adjusting the conditions for the synthesis of Yb/Er co-doped LaF3 nanocrystals, pure hexagonal-phase UCNPs were obtained by adding 5.0 mmol NaOH to the reaction mixture followed by reacting for 30 min.
In addition, the fluorescence intensities of the UCNPs were up to 17 times that of the control sample when 2.5 and 5.0 mmol NaOH and a reaction time of 1 h were employed. By modifying the composition and concentration of the dopants, the UC emissions obtained under 980 nm NIR laser irradiation could be precisely adjusted. By tuning the doping ratio of Yb/Tm, UV-emissive LaF3:Yb3+0.30, Tm3+0.005 UCNPs were successfully synthesized. The hydrophobic LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNPs capped using oleic acid were surface-modified with PEG–imidazole via ligand exchange and converted into water-dispersible UCNPs. The present system was effectively applied in the detection of Hg2+ under NIR irradiation.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/12/2477/s1. Figure S1: Fourier transform infrared spectra of oleate-capped UCNPs and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-imidazole capped UCNPs (after ligand exchange). Figure S2: Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 core/shell UCNP. Figure S3. Stern-Volmer plots of two main emission bands for Hg2+ induced quenching of the LaF3:Yb3+0.20, Er3+0.02@LaF3:Yb3+0.20 UCNPs.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.-W.C., C.-H.Y., and T.-L.W.; Data curation, C.-H.H. and C.-H.Y.; Formal analysis, C.-H.H.; Funding acquisition, T.-L.W.; Investigation, C.-H.H.; Resources, H.-W.C.; Supervision, T.-L.W.; Validation, C.-H.Y.; Writing—original draft, H.-W.C.; Writing—review and editing, T.-L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Authors are grateful to the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan through Grant MOST 105-2221-E-390-029.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sun L., Wei R., Feng J., Zhang H. Tailored lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles and their promising bioapplication prospects. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018;364:10–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fan Y., Liu L., Zhang F. Exploiting lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles with core/shell structures. Nano Today. 2019;25:68–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bagheri A., Arandiyan H., Boyer C., Lim M. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles: Emerging intelligent light-activated drug delivery systems. Adv. Sci. 2016;3:1500437. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen C., Li C., Shi Z. Current advances in lanthanide-doped upconversion nanostructures for detection and bioapplication. Adv. Sci. 2016;3:1600029. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang Q., Yang F., Xu Z., Chaker M., Ma D. Are lanthanide-doped upconversion materials good candidates for photocatalysis? Nanoscale Horiz. 2019;4:579–591. doi: 10.1039/C8NH00373D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kang D., Jeon1 E., Kim S., Lee J. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanomaterials: Recent advances and applications. BioChip J. 2020;14:124–135. doi: 10.1007/s13206-020-4111-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee G., Park Y.I. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:511. doi: 10.3390/nano8070511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen G., Qiu H., Prasad P.N., Chen X. Upconversion nanoparticles: Design, nanochemistry, and applications in theranostics. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:5161–5214. doi: 10.1021/cr400425h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DaCosta M.V., Doughan S., Han Y., Krull U.J. Lanthanide upconversion nanoparticles and applications in bioassays and bioimaging: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;832:1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feng W., Sun L.D., Zhang Y.W., Yan C.H. Synthesis and assembly of rare earth nanostructures directed by the principle of coordination chemistry in solution-based process. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010;254:1038–1053. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chatterjee D.K., Gnanasammandhan M.K., Zhang Y. Small upconverting fluorescent nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Small. 2010;6:2781–2795. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen Z., Chen H., Hu H., Yu M., Li F., Zhang Q., Huang C. Versatile synthesis strategy for carboxylic acid−functionalized upconverting nanophosphors as biological labels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:3023–3029. doi: 10.1021/ja076151k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li C., Lin J. Rare earth fluoride nano-/microcrystals: Synthesis, surface modification and application. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:6831–6847. doi: 10.1039/c0jm00031k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mai H.X., Zhang Y.W., Si R., Yan Z.G., Sun L.D., You L.P., Yan C.H. High-quality sodium rare-earth fluoride nanocrystals: Controlled synthesis and optical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:6426–6436. doi: 10.1021/ja060212h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hu H., Chen Z., Cao T., Zhang Q., Yu M., Li F., Yi T., Huang C. Hydrothermal synthesis of hexagonal lanthanide-doped LaF3 nanoplates with bright upconversion luminescence. Nanotechnology. 2008;19:375702. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/37/375702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lv R., Yang G., He F., Dai Y., Gai S., Yang P. LaF3:Ln mesoporous spheres: Controllable synthesis, tunable luminescence and application for dual-modal chemo-/photo-thermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2014;6:14799–14809. doi: 10.1039/C4NR04336G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nie L., Shen Y., Zhang X., Wang X., Liu B., Wang Y., Pan Y., Xie X., Huang L., Huang W. Selective synthesis of LaF3 and NaLaF4 nanocrystals via lanthanide ion doping. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:9188–9193. doi: 10.1039/C7TC02362F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kasturi S., Marikumar R., Vaidyanathan S. Trivalent rare-earth activated hexagonal lanthanum fluoride (LaF3:RE3+, where RE = Tb, Sm, Dy and Tm) nanocrystals: Synthesis and optical properties. Luminescence. 2018;33:897–906. doi: 10.1002/bio.3488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Secu C.E., Matei E., Negrila C., Secu M. The influence of the nanocrystals size and surface on the Yb/Er doped LaF3 luminescence properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;791:1098–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng X., Ma X., Zhang H., Ren Y., Zhu K. Optical temperature sensing properties of Yb3+/Er3+ codoped LaF3 upconversion phosphor. Physica B Condens. Matter. 2017;521:270–274. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pudovkin M.S., Koryakovtseva D.A., Lukinova E.V., Korableva S.L., Khusnutdinova R.S., Kiiamov A.G., Nizamutdinov A.S., Semashko V.V. Luminescence nanothermometry based on Pr3+:LaF3 single core and Pr3+:LaF3/LaF3 core/shell nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019:2618307. doi: 10.1155/2019/2618307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Razumkova I.A., Denisenko Y.G., Boyko A.N., Ikonnikov D.A., Aleksandrovsky A.S., Azarapin N.O., Andreev O.V. Synthesis and upconversion luminescence in LaF3:Yb3+, Ho3+, GdF3: Yb3+, Tm3+ and YF3:Yb3+, Er3+ obtained from sulfide precursors. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2019;645:1393–1401. doi: 10.1002/zaac.201900204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li C., Yang J., Yang P., Lian H., Lin J. Hydrothermal synthesis of lanthanide fluorides LnF3 (Ln= La to Lu) nano-/microcrystals with multiform structures and morphologies. Chem. Mater. 2008;20:4317–4326. doi: 10.1021/cm800279h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tian Y., Jiao X., Zhang J., Sui N., Chen D., Hong G. Molten salt synthesis of LaF3: Eu3+ nanoplates with tunable size and their luminescence properties. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010;12:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9590-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang L., Li P., Li Y. Down- and up-conversion luminescent nanorods. Adv. Mater. 2007;19:3304–3307. doi: 10.1002/adma.200700144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang Y.W., Sun X., Si R., You L.P., Yan C.H. Single-crystalline and monodisperse LaF3 triangular nanoplates from a single-source precursor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:3260–3261. doi: 10.1021/ja042801y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Longmire M., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: Considerations and caveats. Nanomedicine. 2008;3:703–717. doi: 10.2217/17435889.3.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kobayashi H., Ogawa M., Alford R., Choyke P.L., Urano Y. New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:2620–2640. doi: 10.1021/cr900263j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu Q., Sun Y., Yang T., Feng W., Li C., Li F. Sub-10 nm hexagonal lanthanide-doped NaLuF4 upconversion nanocrystals for sensitive bioimaging in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:17122–17125. doi: 10.1021/ja207078s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou J., Liu Z., Li F. Upconversion nanophosphors for small-animal imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1323–1349. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15187H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stouwdam J.W., van Veggel F.C. Near-infrared emission of redispersible Er3+, Nd3+, and Ho3+ doped LaF3 nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2002;2:733–737. doi: 10.1021/nl025562q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bao L., Li Z., Tao Q., Xie J., Mei Y., Xiong Y. Controlled synthesis of uniform LaF3 polyhedrons, nanorods and nanoplates using NaOH and ligands. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:145604. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/14/145604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Long L., Tan X., Luo S., Shi C. Fluorinated near-infrared fluorescent probes for specific detection of Hg2+ in an aqueous medium and mitochondria of living cells. New J. Chem. 2017;41:8899–8904. doi: 10.1039/C7NJ01327B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rodrigues E.M., Gálico D.A., Mazali I.O., Sigoli F.A. Temperature probing and emission color tuning by morphology and size control of upconverting β-NaYb0. 67Gd0. 30F4: Tm0. 015: Ho0. 015 nanoparticles. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2017;5:024012. doi: 10.1088/2050-6120/aa716f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vetrone F., Naccache R., Mahalingam V., Morgan C.G., Capobianco J.A. The active-core/active-shell approach: A strategy to enhance the upconversion luminescence in lanthanide-doped nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:2924–2929. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200900234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ghosh P., Oliva J., Rosa E.D.L., Haldar K.K., Solis D., Patra A. Enhancement of upconversion emission of LaPO4:Er@Yb core−shell nanoparticles/nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2008;112:9650–9658. doi: 10.1021/jp801978b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang F., Shi Q., Zhang Y., Shi Y., Ding K., Zhao D., Stucky G.D. Fluorescence upconversion microbarcodes for multiplexed biological detection: Nucleic acid encoding. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:3775–3779. doi: 10.1002/adma.201190129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chien H.W., Wu C.H., Yang C.H., Wang T.L. Multiple doping effect of LiYF4: Yb3+/Er3+/Ho3+/Tm3+@LiYF4:Yb3+ core/shell nanoparticles and its application in Hg2+ sensing detection. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;806:272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Eom Y., Abbas M., Noh H., Kim C. Morphology-controlled synthesis of highly crystalline Fe3O4 and CoFe2O4 nanoparticles using a facile thermal decomposition method. RSC Adv. 2016;6:15861–15867. doi: 10.1039/C5RA27649G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baziulyte-Paulaviciene D., Traskina N., Vargalis R., Katelnikovas A., Sakirzanovas S. Thermal decomposition synthesis of Er3+-activated NaYbF4 upconverting microparticles for optical temperature sensing. J. Lumin. 2019;215:116672. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.116672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kostiv U., Engstová H., Krajnik B., Šlouf M., Proks V., Podhorodecki A., Ježek P., Horák D. Monodisperse core-shell NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+@NaYF4:Nd3+-PEG-GGGRGDSGGGY-NH2 nanoparticles excitable at 808 and 980 nm: Design, surface engineering, and application in life sciences. Front. Chem. 2020;8:497. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Runowski M., Stopikowska N., Szeremeta D., Goderski S., Skwierczyńska M., Lis S. Upconverting lanthanide fluoride core@shell nanorods for luminescent thermometry in the first and second biological windows: β-NaYF4:Yb3+–Er3+@SiO2 temperature sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:13389–13396. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b00445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Joubert M.F. Photon avalanche upconversion in rare earth laser materials. Opt. Mater. 1999;11:181–203. doi: 10.1016/S0925-3467(98)00043-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chung Y.C., Yang C.H., Lee R.H., Wang T.L. Dual stimuli-responsive block copolymers for controlled release triggered by upconversion luminescence or temperature variation. ACS Omega. 2019;4:3322–3328. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Generalova A.N., Rocheva V.V., Nechaev A.V., Khochenkov D.A., Sholina N.V., Semchishen V.A., Zubov V.P., Koroleva A.V., Chichkov B.N., Khaydukov E.V. PEG-modified upconversion nanoparticles for in vivo optical imaging of tumors. RSC Adv. 2016;6:30089–30097. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25304G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boyer J.C., Manseau M.P., Murray J.I., van Veggel F.C.J.M. Surface modification of upconverting NaYF4 nanoparticles with PEG−phosphate ligands for NIR (800 nm) biolabeling within the biological window. Langmuir. 2010;26:1157–1164. doi: 10.1021/la902260j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gee A., Xu X. Surface functionalisation of upconversion nanoparticles with different moieties for biomedical applications. Surfaces. 2018;1:9. doi: 10.3390/surfaces1010009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sundberg R.J., Martin R.B. Interactions of histidine and other imidazole derivatives with transition metal ions in chemical and biological systems. Chem. Rev. 1974;74:471–517. doi: 10.1021/cr60290a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhou L., Lin Y., Huang Z., Ren J., Qu X. Carbon nanodots as fluorescence probes for rapid, sensitive, and label-free detection of Hg2+ and biothiols in complex matrices. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:1147–1149. doi: 10.1039/C2CC16791C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xia Y.S., Zhu C.Q. Use of surface-modified CdTe quantum dots as fluorescent probes in sensing mercury (II) Talanta. 2008;75:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang C., Zhao J., Wang Y., Lou N., Ma Q., Su X. Sensitive Hg (II) ion detection by fluorescent multilayer films fabricated with quantum dots. Sens. Actuators B. 2009;139:476–482. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang L.J., Yu R.Q., Chu X. DNA-functionalized upconversion nanoparticles as biosensors for rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of Hg2+ in complex matrices. Analyst. 2015;140:4987–4990. doi: 10.1039/C5AN00635J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mah V., Jalilehvand F. Mercury(II) complex formation with glutathione in alkaline aqueous solution. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2008;13:541–553. doi: 10.1007/s00775-008-0342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mah V., Jalilehvand F. Glutathione complex formation with mercury (II) in aqueous solution at physiological pH. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010;23:1815–1823. doi: 10.1021/tx100260e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.