Skip to main content
Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation logoLink to Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation
. 2020 Dec 31;2020:baaa115. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa115

HeartBioPortal2.0: new developments and updates for genetic ancestry and cardiometabolic quantitative traits in diverse human populations

Bohdan B Khomtchouk 1,*, Christopher S Nelson 2, Kasra A Vand 3, Salvator Palmisano 4, Robert L Grossman 5
PMCID: PMC7774463  PMID: 33382884

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide for all genders and across most racial and ethnic groups. However, different races and ethnicities exhibit different rates of CVD and its related cardiorenal and metabolic comorbidities, suggesting differences in genetic predisposition and risk of onset, as well as socioeconomic and lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, etc.) that act upon an individual’s unique underlying genetic background. Here, we present HeartBioPortal2.0, a major update to HeartBioPortal, the world’s largest CVD genetics data precision medicine platform for harmonized CVD-relevant genetic variants, which now enables search and analysis of human genetic information related to heart disease across ethnically diverse populations and cardiovascular/renal/metabolic quantitative traits pertinent to CVD pathophysiology. HeartBioPortal2.0 is structured as a cloud-based computing platform and knowledge portal that consolidates a multitude of CVD-relevant genomic data modalities into a single powerful query and browsing interface between data and user via a user-friendly web application publicly available to the scientific research community. Since its initial release, HeartBioPortal2.0 has added new cardiovascular/renal/metabolic disease–relevant gene expression data as well as genetic association data from numerous large-scale genome-wide association study consortiums such as CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, TOPMed, FinnGen, AFGen, MESA, MEGASTROKE, UK Biobank, CHARGE, Biobank Japan and MyCode, among other studies. In addition, HeartBioPortal2.0 now includes support for quantitative traits and ethnically diverse populations, allowing users to investigate the shared genetic architecture of any gene or its variants across the continuous cardiometabolic spectrum from health (e.g. blood pressure traits) to disease (e.g. hypertension), facilitating the understanding of CVD trait genetics that inform health-to-disease transitions and endophenotypes. Custom visualizations in the new and improved user interface, including performance enhancements and new security features such as user authentication, collectively re-imagine HeartBioPortal’s user experience and provide a data commons that co-locates data, storage and computing infrastructure in the context of studying the genetic basis behind the leading cause of global mortality.

Database URL: https://www.heartbioportal.com/

Introduction

The world’s aging population (>65 years old) is projected to triple by the year 2050, creating an impending rise in future demand for health care innovation within the cardiovascular disease (CVD) market sector, since the most important determinant of cardiovascular health is a person’s age (1), which is why age is such a critical component of CVD etiology. Specifically, age is known to be the largest risk factor of CVD (2), as it lowers the threshold for CVD manifestation (3). CVDs are comprised of a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels and include coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease (stroke), heart failure and other conditions, including cardiorenal and cardiometabolic comorbidities and complications such as chronic kidney disease and type II diabetes. Given the rise in the aging population, coupled with the continuous decline of sequencing costs, genetics will continue to occupy an increasingly important role in the clinic. Many cardiology practice guidelines already incorporate genetic data in recommendations for diagnosis and personalized clinical management (4). Already it is well-recognized by clinicians and researchers alike that the roadmap to future implementation of personalized, or precision, medicine in cardiovascular/renal/metabolic disease must take into account individual and subgroup variability in genetic architecture, environment, clinical measures, lifestyle, cost-effectiveness and treatment burden, e.g. in disorders with substantial phenotypic heterogeneity such as type II diabetes (5) or heart failure (6, 7). A step one to this process involves making it computationally feasible to figure out what is currently known about any given gene of interest in any specific CVD phenotype using the latest publicly available datasets/publications, and providing the tools/infrastructure to do so, effectively leveraging for secondary analysis existing clinical and genetic datasets from federally funded NIH(National Institutes of Health) and NSF (National Science Foundation) research grants to provide an easily searchable and accessible data commons for all. Such a computational framework and cardioinformatics initiative (8) would mark a significant advance in traversing not only the bench-to-bedside divide but also the informatics-to-medicine divide that still exists in contemporary biomedicine and biomedical data science. The vision of HeartBioPortal (9) has always been to bridge these gaps by heralding in a data-driven future for cardiovascular clinical patient care, effectively building the computational supply needed to address future demand at the population levels projected in 2050 and beyond.

The HeartBioPortal project originally began as a way to lower the barriers to complex biological discovery from existing clinical and genetic datasets, similar to the dynamic provided by cancer genomics resources such as cBioPortal (10, 11) and the Genomic Data Commons (12, 13). Resources such as the American Heart Association’s Precision Medicine Platform (14) or Broad’s Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Portal (15) either specialize on a single data modality [e.g. genome-wide association study (GWAS)] or simply do not provide intuitive visualization and analysis of large-scale CVD datasets, instead relying on users to pinpoint relevant datasets themselves and generate their own independent analyses on them, putting these resources out of reach from biologists with no programming or bioinformatics expertise. This trend can still very much be observed in recently launched emerging resources such as the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s (NHLBI) BioData Catalyst (BDC) (16), which does not provide a simple interface for users who simply wish to perform gene or variant-level search across existing CVD genomic datasets, which is an unmet need adequately addressed in HeartBioPortal. In essence, HeartBioPortal effectively democratizes CVD genomics data, by enabling gene- and variant-level search across various heart disease and stroke phenotypes for the broader research community.

At the same time, HeartBioPortal is also directly useful to power users interested in seeing CVD genetics information at scale, given that the platform already bioinformatically preprocesses and distills down terabyte-scale publicly available genomic data across multiple heterogeneous modalities into easy-to-interpret figures and charts, including tidy data downloads provided in simple .csv format. Essentially, initiatives such as NHLBI’s BDC and knowledge portals such as HeartBioPortal serve different needs and purposes—one (BDC) provides access to CVD datasets and workspaces that support large-scale genomic pipelines and the other (HeartBioPortal) provides an easy-to-use capability to search, analyze and visualize annotated CVD variants that have been uniformly processed and curated. As detailed on BDC’s Zenodo launched on 31 August 2020: ‘Over the last several decades, NHLBI has invested in creating a significant resource for research and development by supporting the creation of many observational, epidemiological, and longitudinal datasets related to heart, lung, blood and sleep phenotypes, with the aim of uncovering insights that may be leveraged toward novel therapeutic, interventional, or preventive strategies resulting in improved patient outcomes. New technologies and favorable cost trajectories have enabled detailed characterization of these study participants including whole genome sequencing (and other omics) and imaging on hundreds of thousands of participants. Together this data coupled with animal and cellular models increase opportunities for data-driven translational science.’ HeartBioPortal provides a simple and intuitive way to search, analyze and visualize some of the most important CVD-relevant genomic variants in these data.

New developments and updates

Since its initial debut in May 2019, HeartBioPortal2.0 has more than tripled its number of unique CVD phenotypes (from 12 to 37), increased its clinical genetic variant count by three orders of magnitude (from 5792 to 6 906 292), almost doubled the number of human genic and intergenic regions featured (from 23 606 to 44 988), added 54 diverse subpopulations across 27 new studies/cohorts, introduced 9641 more genes from differential expression analyses of various new high-quality CVD-relevant gene expression studies published between now and initial debut, and added 56 cardiometabolic quantitative traits such as lipids, electrolytes, ECG/MRI traits, etc. to facilitate complex exploratory data analyses such as those presented in Figure 1. Given that the CVD research community continues to rely heavily on publicly available GWAS data and summary statistics, we have focused a lot of our software engineering effort on developing custom JavaScript visualizations such as the data-intensive interactive Venn diagram in Figure 1 to help make sense of GWAS data at scale in a fast and responsive user interface (UI) that drives biological insight. We have also made other substantial UI improvements such as a new P-value dropdown menu directly in the Genetic Association panel at the top of HeartBioPortal2.0’s gene pages to allow users to visually filter displayed GWAS results according to desired levels of statistical stringency. Finally, HeartBioPortal2.0’s search feature now integrates intergenic polymorphisms, which are valuable phenotype-associated variants that can be located between genes. It is known that most of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in GWAS as being associated with quantitative traits such as blood pressure are pleiotropic and mapped to noncoding regions of the genome (17). Intergenic polymorphisms are displayed in ‘gene1-gene2’ intergenic segments and we recommend investigating the intergenic data available flanking a gene of interest.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

HeartBioPortal2.0’s shared genetic architecture feature. The gene ADD1 is known to be associated with salt-sensitive essential hypertension—here we see the shared genetic architecture of that gene’s variants (represented as unique reference SNP ID number (rsID) accession identifiers) across the continuous cardiometabolic spectrum from health (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) to disease (hypertension), facilitating the understanding of CVD trait genetics underlying health-to-disease transitions and endophenotypes. HeartBioPortal’s frontend design philosophy has always been to keep the user interface clean and minimalistic to ensure viewer comprehension and avoid potential confusion; therefore, additional details can be acquired from the hyperlinked data download, which is presented in a tidy .csv format amenable to follow-up analyses.

Methods

HeartBioPortal2.0 is comprised of >200 KLOCs written in a mixture of R, Python-3.8, JavaScript and Rust. The frontend framework is Vue.js and the backend is implemented in a combination of Django, Aerospike, ElasticSearch and PostgreSQL. HeartBioPortal2.0 is a cloud-based computing platform hosted on Amazon Web Services and DigitalOcean servers that source and sync its CVD-relevant genomics data from biological databases such as Ensembl, ClinVar, NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog, gwasATLAS, OMIM, dbGaP, GTEx, CREEDS, HapMap, 1000Genomes, gnomAD, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), ArrayExpress and OmicsDI. It also contains CVD-relevant data from large-scale GWAS consortiums such as CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, TOPMed, FinnGen, AFGen, MESA, MEGASTROKE, UK Biobank, CHARGE, Biobank Japan and MyCode, among others (including individual publications in top-tier journals that make GWAS datasets and summary statistics publicly available for secondary analysis). This includes highly specialized GWASs for CVD phenotypes such as tetralogy of Fallot, which can be found under the congenital heart disease phenotype category in HeartBioPortal2.0.

Genetic association

GWAS summary statistics for cardiovascular and renal/metabolic-related (e.g. kidney function) traits were downloaded and filtered down for markers with reported P ≤ 0.05. We did not attempt to further harmonize the P-values from different studies but present them as downloaded from each source. Our P-value filtering is intended to remove most markers with no phenotype-association signal but is not intended to signal genome-wide significance, which typically uses a much more stringent threshold. Users looking to see only the most significant association results (e.g. P < 1E-5 or P < 1E-8) should consider using the P-value slider on the HeartBioPortal2.0 gene pages. To annotate the filtered genetic markers, we queried myvariant.info (18) via post requests and parsed the returned status and JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) using a custom Python script. Where possible, we attempted to use Reference SNP cluster IDs (rsIDs) from the original GWAS to annotate each marker of interest. Where this was not possible, we queried using the chromosomal coordinates and Ref/Alt alleles (genomic HGVS). Returned annotated results for multiallelic markers were split into the child biallelic markers, each keeping the original P-value for convenience. We chose to primarily rely on SnpEff (19) annotations because these were the most complete in terms of number of variants covered for the most relevant annotation fields presented in the data downloads.

In contrast to disease states that have a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ value for each patient, quantitative traits involve a continuous variable for each patient. For example, hypertension is a disease state while systolic blood pressure is a quantitative trait. Instead of the P-value indicating the association of a variant with risk of disease, quantitative GWASs report the association of a variant with a raised or lowered clinical value such as systolic blood pressure or some other trait. We have processed quantitative trait GWAS summary statistics the same as for disease state summary statistics. Both data types are present in new HeartBioPortal2.0 visualizations such as the variant viewer lollipop plot (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

HeartBioPortal2.0’s variant viewer chart feature. The gene MYH7 is known to be associated with cardiomyopathy—here we see an interactive lollipop plot showing all known clinical genetic variants in MYH7 across multiple biological databases such as ClinVar, NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog, Ensembl, gnomAD, etc. The user can learn more information about any variant by hovering over the circles to display, e.g. the MYH7:p.Arg869His variant in this newly updated variant viewer chart. In addition, HeartBioPortal2.0 users can save their chart (for figures/diagrams in publications, seminars, etc.) and press the data download button to obtain additional details/metadata presented in a tidy .csv format amenable to additional follow-up data analyses. There are often multiple accession identifiers present in the dropdown menu of the variant viewer plot (e.g. for the gene DSP or TTN) to display variants found in both the canonical transcript of the gene as well as its alternative splice isoforms. Therefore, the variant viewer plot depicts variants found in all transcripts that have a known protein product associated with the respective CVD phenotype.

Gene expression

HeartBioPortal2.0 uses the GEO2R tool from GEO (20, 21), which relies on the limma (22) Bioconductor package to identify genes that are differentially expressed across experimental conditions (e.g. case/control) and applies a Benjamini and Hochberg [False discovery rate (FDR)] (23) adjustment to the P-values, reporting only those top differentially expressed genes whose adjusted P-values are <0.05. Therefore, the expression results presented in HeartBioPortal2.0 are of high stringency to minimize the presence of any false positives.

Through the HeartBioPortal2.0 data-processing pipeline, initial parsing of GEO for studies associated with CVD keywords returned a list of 685 CVD studies hosted on the GEO platform. Removal and manual curation of duplicate studies due to the presence of multiple CVD keywords was performed, resulting in 541 unique CVD studies. Due to diversity in experimental type and study designs, manual curation of the remaining studies was performed to: (i) verify the type of experimental data, (ii) verify that the research question was appropriate for the associated CVD keyword and (iii) verify proper selection of case/control subjects for differential gene expression analysis with respect to the CVD phenotype of interest.

This curation procedure ensured that the 142 remaining studies were appropriate for the gene expression feature of the HeartBioPortal2.0 platform, and these studies were input into the HeartBioPortal2.0 data-processing pipeline. This pipeline utilizes the GEOquery (24) and limma packages in R through the GEO2R web tool to download experiment results and perform differential expression analysis and includes downstream processing to ensure a uniform standardized format. Differential expression analysis resulted in 60 carefully selected and curated studies with 9641 more significant differentially expressed genes in HeartBioPortal2.0’s gene expression suite. Results are presented in a simple UI (Figure 3) with additional metadata such as FDR adjusted P-value, fold change, PubMed ID (PMID), etc. obtainable from the Data Download link in the top right.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HeartBioPortal2.0’s differential gene expression feature. Users can visually explore the landscape of up- and downregulation of any gene across a variety of CVD-relevant phenotypes from GEO studies that have been further manually curated and harmonized for HeartBioPortal inclusion via a uniform data-processing pipeline (as described in Methods section). In addition, the Data Download button provides actionable metadata such as FDR adjusted P-value, fold change (presented as logFC) and PMID to facilitate exploratory data analyses.

System performance and security

Using the Rust programming language in HeartBioPortal2.0, we experienced 20× speedups (relative to Python in HeartBioPortal1.0) in creating a customized NoSQL database for our users to filter/download hundreds of gigabytes of genetic variant data in less than a few seconds. For example, registered users experience blazingly fast data downloads (<1 second, 107 variants). Therefore, the Data Download button now has much faster performance across all major browsers (Firefox, Chrome and Safari), in addition to being protected by reCAPTCHA and requiring user login/registration for authentication credentials. The NIH Genomic Data Sharing policy encourages minimal barriers to access genomic summary results. Therefore, investigators are able to see and query data at the summary level within HeartBioPortal2.0 without needing to go through a data access request process, since the data are de-identified. However, logging in via an authorized account is required before a user can download the de-identified data. Similar to other resources like dbGaP, this enables logging and monitoring of users and provides an opportunity to remind users of the three principles for responsible research use and compliance (no attempt to re-identify, use only for research or health purposes, and review of the responsible genomic data use information materials). The data provided in HeartBioPortal2.0 are available under the Open Data Commons (ODC) Open Database License (ODbL). Users are free to share and modify the data so long as they properly attribute any public use of the database, or works produced from the database; keep the resulting datasets open; and offer their shared or adapted version of the dataset under the same ODbL license.

Discussion

Future directions in HeartBioPortal’s software development (in version 3.0 and above) will include further refining and updating complex visualizations like the genetic ancestry and variant geography maps (Figure 4), as well as including new bioinformatics pipelines and frontend support for harmonizing and visualizing CVD-relevant single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and ATAC sequencing (scATAC-seq) datasets from multiple studies. For visualizations such as the shared genetic architecture Venn diagram (Figure 1), note that the overlapping association may be of different strengths, and divergent association signals show that multiple allelic effects might be in play, or the genotyped marker sets do not overlap perfectly between different studies. As with many association results, users should be cautious in over-interpreting overlapping association signals. There is no strict guarantee that a given element associated with two phenotypes is regulating the same gene, though it would be a parsimonious hypothesis for further mechanistic investigation. Therefore, future versions of HeartBioPortal will focus on the dominant signal at each locus where possible (lead SNP, or credible set) when analyzing the overlapping genetic architecture of phenotypes. In the meantime, we encourage users to make use of the Venn diagram download functionality to further examine the highlighted association signals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

HeartBioPortal2.0’s genetic ancestry and variant geography feature. CVD-relevant exome/genome population allele frequency data displayed in the Ancestry and Variant Geography maps from dozens of studies/cohorts ranging from gnomAD to ‘Genome of the Netherlands Release 5’ to ‘Korean population from KRGDB’ among many others. In total, 54 diverse subpopulations across 27 new studies/cohorts have been added, relative to gnomAD alone in HeartBioPortal’s initial debut in May 2019. Users can now search individual mutations (rsID accession identifiers) as well as toggle a Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) slider bar that interactively displays the proportion of rare vs. common variants at user-selected MAF thresholds.

Future versions of HeartBioPortal may also introduce metrics such as effect size (beta) and standard error to downloadable files by interoperating HeartBioPortal with rich GWAS-centric resources such as the Broad Institute’s Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Portal (15), including the recently launched Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal (25), as part of Broad Institute’s emerging Human Genetics Amplifier initiative (26), which will continue to develop further over time. As such, we strongly encourage HeartBioPortal users to consult and cross-reference these additional resources to facilitate higher reproducibility in exploratory data analyses of existing CVD-relevant GWASs. Currently, GWAS model fit statistics such as beta are difficult to provide because many publicly available GWASs do not report them, and sometimes these studies are not run in a way that returns a uniform set of model statistics. In the meantime, we encourage users interested in a particular association signal or dataset to refer to the source publication for a deeper evaluation of association effect size and robustness.

Furthermore, to augment the wealth of CVD-relevant SNP data from various GWAS efforts, we plan to add CVD-relevant structural variation (copy number variants, complex short substitutions, inversions, mobile elements, translocations, etc.), including drug discovery support (early target discovery genetics), to facilitate data-driven systematic target identification and prioritization of CVD drugs, effectively expanding the HeartBioPortal platform into a digital drug discovery dashboard for cardiovascular/renal/metabolic disease. This includes broadening the focus of HeartBioPortal beyond human CVD data into publicly available model organism studies, which will ultimately aid and de-risk preclinical to phase I clinical transitions by helping users look for biological mechanisms that are consistent across species. Conserved effects are a robust signal that a target is tractable from a drug development perspective.

In addition, we have constructed a product roadmap to interoperate HeartBioPortal with controlled-access data commons such as NHLBI’s BDC, leveraging open-source tools such as Fence (27) to provide downstream authentication and authorization of Gen3 services (28), with the end-goal of transforming HeartBioPortal into a Gen3 client of BDC. This will give BDC users access to uniformly processed CRAM/VCF file results from a wide range of available human studies present in HeartBioPortal. Similar to our project, an existing resource called the eQTL Catalogue (29) processes public datasets using its uniform computational pipeline, and we aim to create a similar sort of dynamic for interoperating BDC with HeartBioPortal using uniform bioinformatics pipelines developed and deployed securely at scale in the cloud. These computational innovations will create substantial real-world impact by introducing a novel hybrid computing strategy that turns a public database user login (e.g. from HeartBioPortal’s authentication page) into a secure key for unlocking additional controlled-access datasets in a safe and secure manner within the same UI (e.g. to see gene- or variant-level results in HeartBioPortal from data ecosystems like BDC, for users that have been pre-approved by BDC via a formal data access request made to an NHLBI data access committee to view specific datasets/cohorts).

Conclusions

HeartBioPortal2.0 constitutes a major upgrade to HeartBioPortal, both data-wise and features-wise, from frontend to backend. Plans are set in place to continue advancing the project rapidly along multiple development fronts, with the goal of harmonizing and integrating large-scale CVD genomic datasets that drive analytical insight on the complex biology of cardiovascular, cardiorenal and cardiometabolic disorders.

Acknowledgements

B.B.K. would like to thank Andrey Rzhetsky, Ph.D. for financial support for HeartBioPortal’s DigitalOcean cloud hosting servers from May 2019 to March 2020. S.P. would like to thank Yoonseo Lee and Maria Krunic for technical support and useful discussions.

Contributor Information

Bohdan B Khomtchouk, Department of Medicine, Section of Computational Biomedicine and Biomedical Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Christopher S Nelson, Independent Researcher, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

Kasra A Vand, Independent Researcher, Istanbul, Turkey.

Salvator Palmisano, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1012 WX, The Netherlands.

Robert L Grossman, Department of Medicine, Section of Computational Biomedicine and Biomedical Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the University of Chicago Center for Translational Data Science Pilot Award (Khomtchouk) since April 2020.

Conflict of interest.

None declared.

References

  • 1. North B.J. and Sinclair D.A. (2012) The intersection between aging and cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res., 110, 1097–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Steenman M. and Lande G. (2017) Cardiac aging and heart disease in humans. Biophys. Rev., 9, 131–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Strait J.B. and Lakatta E.G. (2012) Aging-associated cardiovascular changes and their relationship to heart failure. Heart Fail. Clin., 8, 143–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Otto C.M., Savla J.J. and Hisama F.M. (2020) Cardiogenetics: a primer for the clinical cardiologist. Heart, 106, 938–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Philipson L.H. (2020) Harnessing heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., 16, 79–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Francis G.S., Cogswell R. and Thenappan T. (2014) The heterogeneity of heart failure: will enhanced phenotyping be necessary for future clinical trial success?  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,  64, 1775–1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rosch S., Rommel K.P. and Scholz M. (2020) Transcriptomic research in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current state and future perspectives. Card. Fail. Rev., 6, e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Khomtchouk B.B., Tran D.T., Vand K.A.  et al. (2019) Cardioinformatics: the nexus of bioinformatics and precision cardiology. Brief. Bioinform., 21, bbz119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Khomtchouk B.B., Vand K.A., Koehler W.C.  et al. (2019) HeartBioPortal: an internet-of-omics for human cardiovascular disease data. Circ.: Genomic Precis. Med., 12, e002426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cerami E., Gao J., Dogrusoz U.  et al. (2012) The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov., 2, 401–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gao J., Aksoy B.A., Dogrusoz U.  et al. (2013) Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal., 6, pl1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Grossman R.L., Heath A.P., Ferretti V.  et al. (2016) Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. N. Engl. J. Med., 375, 1109–1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Jensen M.A., Ferretti V., Grossman R.L.  et al. (2017) The NCI genomic data commons as an engine for precision medicine. Blood, 130, 453–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kass-Hout T.A., Stevens L.M. and Hall J.L. (2018) American Heart Association precision medicine platform. Circulation, 137, 647–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Portal. http://www.broadcvdi.org/ (22 December 2020, date last accessed).
  • 16. BioData Catalyst Consortium The NHLBI BioData Catalyst. Zenodo (31  August  2020, date last accessed).
  • 17. Padmanabhan S. and Dominiczak A.F. (2020) Genomics of hypertension: the road to precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. Online ahead of print: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33219353/ doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00466-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Xin J., Mark A., Afrasiabi C.  et al. (2016) High-performance web services for querying gene and variant annotation. Genome Biol., 17, 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cingolani P., Platts A., Wang L.L.  et al. (2012) A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin), 6, 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Edgar R., Domrachev M. and Lash A.E. (2002) Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 207–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Barrett T., Wilhite S.E., Ledoux P.  et al. (2012) NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D991–D995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D.  et al. (2015) Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res., 43, e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Benjamini Y. and Hochberg Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Davis S. and Meltzer P. (2007) GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics, 14, 1846–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard. Common metabolic diseases knowledge portal.  https://hugeamp.org/ (22  December  2020, date last accessed).
  • 26. The Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard. Human genetics amplifier.  https://kp4cd.org/ (22  December  2020, date last accessed).
  • 27. University of Chicago. Fence.  https://github.com/uc-cdis/fence (22  December  2020, date last accessed).
  • 28. Hughes L., Grossman R.L., Flamig Z.  et al. (2019) Harmonization of clinical data across Gen3 data commons. J. Clin. Oncol., 37, e18094. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kerimov N., Hayhurst J.D., Manning J.R.  et al. (2020) eQTL catalogue: a compendium of uniformly processed human gene expression and splicing QTLs. BioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES