Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244486

Long-term effects of severe acute malnutrition during childhood on adult cognitive, academic and behavioural development in African fragile countries: The Lwiro cohort study in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Pacifique Mwene-Batu 1,2,3,4,*, Ghislain Bisimwa 1,3, Marius Baguma 4,5, Joelle Chabwine 4,6,7, Achille Bapolisi 1,4, Christine Chimanuka 1, Christian Molima 1, Michèle Dramaix 2, Nicolas Kashama 3, Jean Macq 8, Philippe Donnen 2
Editor: Frédéric Denis9
PMCID: PMC7774943  PMID: 33382748

Abstract

Introduction

Little is known about the outcomes of subjects with a history of severe acute malnutrition (SAM). We therefore sought to explore the long-term effects of SAM during childhood on human capital in adulthood in terms of education, cognition, self-esteem and health-related disabilities in daily living.

Methodology

We traced 524 adults (median age of 22) in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, who were treated for SAM during childhood at Lwiro hospital between 1988 and 2007 (median age 41 months). We compared them with 407 community controls of comparable age and sex. Our outcomes of interest were education, cognitive function [assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) for literate participants, or its modified version created by Ertan et al. (MMSE-I) for uneducated participants], self-esteem (measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and health-related social and functional disabilities measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). For comparison, we used the Chi-squared test along with the Student’s t-test for the proportions and means respectively.

Results

Compared with the community controls, malnutrition survivors had a lower probability of attaining a high level of education (p < 0.001), of reporting a high academic performance (p = 0.014) or of having high self-esteem (p = 0.003). In addition, malnutrition survivors had an overall mean score in the cognitive test that was lower compared with the community controls [25.6 compared with 27.8, p = 0.001 (MMSE) and 22.8 compared with 26.3, p < 0.001(MMSE-I)] and a lower proportion of subjects with a normal result in this test (78.0% compared with 90.1%, p < 0.001). Lastly, in terms of health-related disabilities, unlike the community controls, malnutrition survivors had less social disability (p = 0.034), but no difference was observed as regards activities of daily living (p = 0.322).

Conclusion

SAM during childhood exposes survivors to low human capital as regards education, cognition and behaviour in adulthood. Policy-deciders seeking to promote economic growth and to address various psychological and medico-social disorders must take into consideration the fact that appropriate investment in child health as regards SAM is an essential means to achieve this.

Background

Malnutrition is a public health problem in low-income countries (LICs). Every year, more than 5.9 million children under the age of five die worldwide, and 45% of those deaths are attributed to undernutrition [1]. A malnourished child’s risk of mortality is 11 times higher than that of a child with a good nutritional status [2]. Two million deaths a year are currently attributed to severe emaciation [3]. Mortality is even higher in cases of emaciation combined with chronic malnutrition [2]. In addition to the consequences in terms of mortality, undernutrition has serious adverse effects on physical development in terms of delayed growth and physical disability, and is associated with cognitive and behavioural disorders in children, particularly when it occurs during childhood [46].

In high- and medium-income countries (HMICs), it has been shown that subjects with a low birth weight and/or low weight gain in childhood are at risk of being smaller, having reduced cognitive development, a low level of education and a lower socio-economic status in adulthood, and of giving birth to underweight children, unlike children who have a good nutritional status [5, 7]. Indeed, in follow-up studies conducted in HMICs, it was observed that adults with a low birth weight and/or low weight gain during childhood scored significantly lower in various cognitive tests and attained a significantly lower level of education than adults who had no history of undernutrition. They were also at higher risk of developing dementia in old age [5, 810]. The reason for this is that undernutrition in childhood affects brain development and leads to less efficient brain function due to myelin deficiency, reduced dendrite branches, alteration in the function of certain neurotransmitters (serotonin and dopamine), as well as the presence of underdeveloped connectivity patterns [11, 12].

Despite growing evidence of the negative long-term effects of childhood undernutrition in HMICs on behaviour, and academic and cognitive performance [5, 810], little is known about the long-term outcomes of children treated for SAM in LICs. The few studies that have examined this issue are mostly old and only concern subjects who were pre-pubertal at the time of follow-up, and in most cases, only considered growth delay during childhood as an indicator of malnutrition [6, 9, 1315].

According to these studies, undernutrition survivors attain fewer years of education and have deficiencies in vocabulary and mathematics, along with other learning or intellectual disabilities [6, 1315]. This poor cognitive and academic development may give them a lower probability of accessing better-paid professions, leading to reduced economic productivity in adulthood. This could create social and economic issues in disadvantaged communities that lead to the vicious circle of intergenerational poverty that hinders the economic development of the majority of LICs [5, 1620]. However, little research has focused on the potential long-term consequences of childhood SAM on cognitive, behavioural and academic development in adulthood in LICs.

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), malnutrition is still a major public health problem, with a chronic malnutrition prevalence of 41.8% among children under the age of five [21]. In 2017, UNICEF estimated the number of children with SAM at 1.9 million, and those with moderate acute malnutrition at 1.5 million [22]. In South Kivu, one of the 26 provinces of the DRC (located in the east of the country), malnutrition has been endemic since the 1960s [23]. Half of all children under the age of five are affected by chronic malnutrition [21].

Lwiro paediatric hospital (HPL) was one of the first facilities to be involved in treating chronic malnutrition in the DRC. A team of researchers supported by the “Centre Scientifique et Médical de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles pour ses Activités de Coopération” (CEMUBAC) developed a SAM treatment model in the 1980s, and began computerising clinical data in 1986. The electronic records contain sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical and biological data gathered from patients hospitalised between 1988 and 2007, from the time of admission through to their discharge from hospital. Previous research studied various specific aspects of malnutrition in the DRC in general and in South Kivu in particular [2428], but none had investigated the potentially harmful effects of SAM during childhood on long-term outcomes, particularly education, and cognitive and behavioural development in adulthood.

Our study aims therefore to evaluate the long-term effects of childhood SAM on the adult human capital of a group of young adults studied 11 to 30 years after nutritional rehabilitation, in a context of no nutrition transition (environment with a monotonous, undiversified and low-quality food situation), living in the east of the DRC. We primarily assessed the effects of childhood SAM on education, cognitive development, self-esteem, and various functional and social disabilities in adulthood.

Methods

Study framework

The study was conducted at the Centre de Recherche en Science Naturelle de Lwiro (CRSN-Lwiro), in the health zones of Katana and Miti-Murhesa, in South Kivu, DRC. The health zones of Miti-Murhesa and Katana are located 33 and 40 km from the city of Bukavu (capital of the province of South Kivu), respectively. The CRSN was created in 1947 and its activities are grouped under four research departments: Biology, Geophysics, Nutrition and Documentation. The Nutrition Department has a paediatric hospital and four integrated health centres which monitor the health and nutrition of children in the community. The main economic activities of the population in the health zones of Miti-Murhesa and Katana are farming, livestock, fishing and small trade [23].

Study design and population

The initial cohort comprised 1,981 patients treated for SAM in childhood at the HPL between 1988 and 2007 [29]. On admission to the hospital, the median age was 41 months with 70.8% of patients aged between 6 and 59 months [29]. The nutrition diagnosis made at the time (based on the weight-to-height ratio plotted on the local growth curve established by De Maeyer in 1959, the presence of nutritional oedema, and serum albumin levels) [28] was reassessed using ENA (Emergency Nutrition Assessment) Software for SMART (version October 2007) for standardisation according to the World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards [30]. Based on the WHO standards, only 84% of the children were classed as having SAM [29]. The others, classed as moderate acute malnutrition or not suffering from acute malnutrition, were excluded. All of the patients hospitalised had been treated according to the guidelines at that time [28].

During the follow-up of these now-adult subjects, 11 to 30 years after nutritional rehabilitation, 524 subjects from the initial cohort still living in the health zones of Miti-Murhesa and Katana were surveyed [29]. These SAM survivors constitute the case group for this study. To assess their long-term growth in the follow-up study, these survivors were compared with 407 controls randomly selected from the same community [29]. The 407 subjects make up the community control group in this study. The community control was defined as a subject who had not been admitted to HPL for SAM, was the same sex, was living in the same community, and was no more than 24 months younger or older than the case. To identify these subjects, community health workers spun a bottle at the case’s home, then went door to door starting with the nearest house in the direction shown by the bottle until they found a subject that met the criteria [29].

Outcomes of interest

Our main outcomes of interest were education, cognition, self-esteem and health-related functional and social disabilities. Secondarily, we assessed access to information through the frequency with which subjects listened to the radio and used social networks.

Education was defined according to the level of education attained and their self-reported academic performance. To assess this academic performance, each participant (literate) gave his impression of his academic performance based on the last academic results obtained. This performance was divided into 3 categories: poor, average and high [31]. The self-reported academic performance was linked with the level of education attained [31, 32]. It was shown that the subjects who reported a poorer academic performance had a higher probability of abandoning education and a low level of cooperative participation in class, unlike those who considered themselves to have a higher level of academic performance [31, 32]. Additionally, this self-reported academic performance served as an indirect way for us to assess academic success independently of the level of education attained due to the fact that, with the persistent socio-economic vulnerability of households aggravated by wars in the region, the education of certain children has been compromised due to lack of financial resources.

Cognition was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (French consensual MMSE version of the GRECO) [33]. This test, initially developed in 1975 by Folstein and McHugh for screening dementia, is used to rapidly assess the cognitive capacities of educated subjects [34]. It comprises a series of thirty questions divided into 6 sections: orientation (10 points), registration (3 points), attention and calculation (5 points), recall (3 points), language (8 points), and repetition (1 point) [33, 34]. For uneducated subjects, Ertan et al. created a modified version (MMSE-I) [35]. For each of the thirty questions, a correct answer gave a score of 1 and an incorrect or near answer, a score of 0. The maximum score was 30. For the interpretation, a result was considered normal if the overall score was between 26 and 30 (for MMSE) and between 23 and 30 (for MMSE-I). A score below 26 for educated subjects and 23 for uneducated subjects was considered abnormal [34, 35]. The MMSE and its modified version for illiterate subjects (MMSE-I) have been used on several occasions in HMICs with a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha) ranging from 0.77 for uneducated subjects in Turkey and Tunisia [36, 37] to 0.88 in uneducated Chinese subjects [8].

Self-esteem was measured using the French version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [38]. This scale is a psychological tool developed by Morris Rosenberg, who worked particularly on self-esteem and self-concept [39]. This scale is based on ten affirmations that give a better understanding of how an individual values himself and the satisfaction he has with himself. The answers to each question were based on a scale of 1 to 4 (1: ‘totally disagree’, 2: ‘somewhat disagree’, 3: ‘somewhat agree’, 4: ‘totally agree’). We then added the points obtained in questions 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 (the positive questions). The score was reversed for the so-called negative questions, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10: give 4 if you choose 1, 3 if you choose 2, 2 if you choose 3, and 1 if you choose 4. In the end, we added the totals to obtain a final score. The score obtained varied between 10 and 40. If the score was lower than 25, self-esteem was very low. Between 25 and 30, self-esteem was low. Between 31 and 34, self-esteem was average. Between 35 and 39, self-esteem was high. Lastly, if the score was 40, self-esteem was very high [38, 39]. Given that we had very few subjects in the categories ‘very high self-esteem’ and ‘very low self-esteem’ (less than 2% per group), we deemed it appropriate to regroup the scores into 3 categories for the analysis: ≤ 30 = low self-esteem, 31–34 = average self-esteem and ≥ 35 = high self-esteem. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale has been validated and frequently used in low- and middle-income countries [38, 40, 41], with a high degree of worldwide internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha) of 0.81 in 28 languages, ranging from 0.58 in the DRC (in French) to 0.85 in Tanzania (in Swahili) among students and in the community [38].

To assess health-related functional (household and professional tasks) and social (getting along with those in their immediate environment) disability, we used 2 of the components of the WHO Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS 2.0). The WHODAS is a multidimensional and intercultural questionnaire comprising 36 items for assessing cognition, mobility, self-care, relationships with people, activities of daily living and participation in society. WHODAS 2.0 has been approved and frequently used in low- and middle-income countries [4244], with a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha) ranging from 0.77 in South African women [45] to between 0.82 and 0.98 in people with several mental disorders and their caregivers in rural Ethiopia [46]. WHODAS 2.0 is also able to detect small changes over time [46]. In addition, there is a Swahili version, which was recently used in South Kivu in the east of the DRC [43].

As regards functional disabilities, we considered a subject as having: no difficulty if his score was between 6 and 10, moderate difficulty between 11 and 14, and severe difficulty between 15 and 24. Lastly, for social disabilities, depending on the score obtained, we considered a subject as having: no disability if their score was between 5 and 10, moderate disability between 11 and 15, and severe disability between 16 and 25. For the scores, the respondent judged the level of difficulty on a five-point scale (none = 1, slight = 2, moderate = 3, severe = 4, extreme/unable = 5). At the end of the questionnaire, the participant was asked to give an overall assessment of the degree of disruption to their life as regards activities of daily living and social activities according to the difficulties they had encountered in the last thirty days. For activities of daily living, there were a total of six questions. The first four questions were scored from 1 to 5, and for the last two questions, the subject obtained ‘1’ if the answer was No and ‘2’ for a Yes. For social disabilities, however, there were a total of five questions, all scored from 1 to 5.

To assess access to information, we used the frequency with which they listened to the radio and used social networks. To measure the frequency with which they listened to the radio, the participant chose one of the following responses: never, rarely, often or always. We then grouped the assertions into two categories (‘Yes’ for answers often and always; ‘No’ for never and rarely). Lastly, for social network use, each participant said whether they used (Yes) or did not use (No) the most common social networks in the region (Facebook, WhatsApp, Yahoo or Gmail).

Data collection

Data collection was carried out in two phases between January 2019 and April 2019. It was carried out by 20 trained community health workers and 2 supervising doctors and assisted by neighbourhood leaders, licensed nurses and community relays. The community health workers were the same ones that had helped identify malnutrition survivors during the creation of the cohort [29].

The first phase involved home visits. During these visits, the community health workers administered a questionnaire, which had been translated into Swahili (national language spoken in the east of the DRC), to the participants, concerning demographic data that included education and health-related functional and social disabilities. They then gave the participants an appointment 24 to 48 hours later in a health facility for the second phase.

During the second phase, a questionnaire concerning self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and cognition (MMSE and MMSE-I) were administered to the participants.

The general questionnaire contained variables relating to the participant’s identity, education, self-reported academic performance, cognitive function assessed using the MMSE and MMSE-I tests, self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), and health-related daily functional and social disabilities. The final data concerned the frequency with which they listened to the radio and used social networks.

The basic structured questionnaire in French was translated into Swahili according to a rigorous translation protocol to ensure intercultural and conceptual equivalence. A French-speaking translator from the language school of the Université Catholique de Bukavu, and whose first language is Swahili, carried out the translation. A bilingual panel composed of the principal researcher, key health professionals working in the field of health in the two zones covered by our study, and community health officers examined the translated version in order to correct any intercultural issues in terms of incomprehensibility or lack of clarity. The resulting document was then translated into French by an independent bilingual reviser. Once translated, a native French speaker compared this French back-translation with the original French version to confirm its equivalence. Before proceeding with the study, itself, the questionnaire was revised and modified following tests in the field, and a pilot study was conducted with a subgroup of 30 people from the region, selected from within the community. The interviews lasted between 30 and 45 minutes.

As regards the cognition assessment using the MMSE and its modified version (MMSE-I), scores were entered directly in the grid at the time of the assessment. Literacy was assessed on the basis of the level of education attained. Subjects who had not completed primary education were considered illiterate. Due to copyright on the use of the MMSE [47, 48] and our limited means, we only used it in a subgroup. To select them, we took subjects who were older than 25 years old and of comparable sex, regardless of their level of education. According to this criterion, out of the initial 524 cases, only 100 were selected. A total of 100 individuals aged more than 25 years, out of the initial 407, were selected as controls. This threshold was used because, beyond the age of 25, humans start to lose their first neurons and a slight decrease in cognitive performance can be observed: decline in memory efficiency, slight slowing of thought, more difficult perception and slower perceptual identification, etc. [49]. In addition, at age 25, an individual is expected to have completed his or her education in our context.

Statistical analysis

We used Stata version 13.1 software for our analyses. The size of the sample was determined by the number of patients admitted for SAM to the Lwiro paediatric hospital from 1998 to 2007 and living in Miti-Murhesa and Katana in 2018. Categorical variables were summarised in the form of frequency and proportion. Quantitative data were presented in the form of a mean and standard deviation (SD) or a median and minimum-maximum (min-max) depending on whether the distribution was symmetrical. Pearson’s Chi-Squared Test (or Fischer’s Exact Test if the criteria for the use of the Chi-Squared were not met) was used to compare the category variables, and the Student t-test to compare the mean between the two groups.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Université Catholique de Bukavu, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Respondents provided signed informed consent for participation in the study, either by written signature or by fingerprints, depending on literacy. Child assent was obtained for respondents below 18 years of age, after a parent or guardian’s consent. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethical committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of our two groups. The median age in the two groups was 22, and males accounted for 52.1% and 50.6% of the cases and controls respectively. Nearly all of our subjects were from the Shi ethnic group in both groups. Approximately two thirds of our population sample were from occupational category three (farmer, fisher, market vendor).

Table 1. Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of the population under study.

  Cases Community Controls  
  N (total) % N (total) % p-value
Age (year) 22 (16–40) * 22 (16–40) * 0.541
Male 524 52.1 407 50.6 0.341
Civil status
Living alone 54.2 62.1
Living in a couple 45.8 37.9 0.129
Tribe 515 403
Shi 99.0 98.2
Other 1.0 1.8 0.879
Religion
Catholic 44.8 45.2
Protestant 50.3 52.1 0.798
Other 4.9 2.7
Occupational category 479 359
Management 3.1 7.5
Administrative + office worker 0.8 1.1 0.137
Farmer + fisher + market vendor 64.9 62.1
Unskilled workers   31.1   29.2  

*Data are Median (Min–Max).

Education, cognitive function and self-esteem

Differences in terms of education, cognitive function and self-esteem between the cases and the community controls are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Difference in education, self-esteem and cognition between cases and controls.

  Cases Community Controls p-value
  N (total) % Mean (SD) N (total) % Mean (SD)
*EDUCATION
1. Level of education 524 407
    None 27.8 20.0
    Primary 37.1 33.6 < 0.001
    Secondary 34.2 42.0
    University 1.0 4.4
2. SR academic performance 378 325
    Low 23.8 15.2
    Average 45.1 49.0 0.014
    High 31.0 35.8
*COGNITION 100 100
    Mean MMSE score (SD) 50.0 25.6 (2.6) 72.0 27.8 (2.2) 0.001
    Mean MMSE-I score (SD) 50.0 22.8 (2.1) 28.0 26.3 (2.9) < 0.001
    Normal 78.0 90.1 < 0.001
*SELF-ESTEEM 518 405
    Low 20.5 12.1
    Average 72.6 78.5 0.003
    High 6.9 9.4
*Listens to the news
    Listens to the radio news (yes) 40.0  49.2 0.007
    Uses social networks 14.0   21.7   0.003 

As regards education, the level attained was significantly lower in the cases compared with the controls. Self-reported academic performance was also significantly lower in the cases compared with the controls.

Comparing the cognitive function of the two groups using the MMSE and MMSE-I, we noted that the global mean scores were significantly lower in the cases compared with the controls. The proportion of individuals who had a normal test was significantly lower in the cases compared with the controls.

Overall, the cases had statistically significant lower self-esteem than the controls.

Lastly, compared with the controls, a significantly lower proportion of cases regularly listened to the news on the radio or used social networks.

Health-related disabilities in the past 30 days

In terms of health-related disabilities in the past 30 days, summarised in Table 3, we observed no difference in disability in carrying out activities of daily living between the two groups. However, the cases had significantly less disability in terms of social relationships than the community controls.

Table 3. Difference in terms of health-related disabilities between cases and controls.

  Cases Community Controls p-value
  N (total) % N (total) %
HEALTH-RELATED DISABILITIES
1. Activities of daily living 523 401
No disability 71.3 68.6
Moderate disability 16.4 17.0  0.322
Severe disability 12.2 14.5
2. Social aspects 521 398
No disability 94.2 91.0
Moderate disability 5.0 8.8 0.034
Severe disability   0.8   0.3  

Discussion

The purpose of our study was to explore the long-term effects of childhood SAM on, primarily, education, cognitive function, self-esteem and health-related social and functional disabilities in adulthood in the context of the DRC, and secondarily, on information seeking.

Our results suggest that SAM during childhood has long-term negative effects on cognitive function and exposes survivors to being less competitive academically as well as having lower self-esteem. Nevertheless, in terms of health-related disabilities, they have less disability on a social level than the general population, but no difference was observed as regards activities of daily living. Lastly, SAM survivors listen to the news less and use social networks infrequently compared with the controls.

To our knowledge, our study is the first in an LIC to assess the long-term effects of childhood SAM in adults after a long period (between 11 and 30 years), after discharge from hospital in a context of endemic malnutrition and crisis. Our study is original in that it: 1) assesses self-esteem, self-reported academic performance, information seeking, and health-related disabilities in addition to education and cognitive functions, 2) has a large sample size, and 3) considers SAM as an exposure.

As regards education and cognitive function, we observed that compared with the community controls, malnutrition survivors were less likely to attain a high level of education, and had a lower mean score on the cognitive test and a higher proportion of subjects with an abnormal cognitive test result. Our findings are consistent with those of several other studies that have shown a strong link between undernutrition during childhood and reduced human capital in later life as regards education and cognitive function [5, 6, 16, 17]. One reason for this is that undernutrition during childhood has an irreversible negative impact on brain development due to a decrease in myelin, an increase in neuronal mitochondria, a decrease in cortical dendrites in the neural spines and a lower ratio of granule cells to Purkinje cells in the cerebellum, altering motor and cognitive development [50]. In addition to SAM, 94% of cases suffered delayed growth in childhood [29]. It has been shown that delayed growth is associated with altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity with high levels of cortisol, a fast heart rate and a high level of urinary epinephrine, which can also lead to reduced cognitive abilities in school-age children [51]. In addition, children with malnutrition do not have sufficient energy or the essential motor skills to thrive at school and therefore complete fewer years of education, which in turn affects their cognition in adulthood [52]. Lastly, malnutrition survivors mostly return to the same disadvantaged conditions after their nutritional rehabilitation [53]. As such, in addition to the effects of malnutrition on academic performance, there are precarious economic conditions which mean that parents cannot pay the school fees to send their children to school [54].

Another relevant point is the inverse relationship between education and cognitive disorders in adulthood measured using cognitive tests [55]. Indeed, it has been shown that education in early life promotes brain growth over the years of learning and helps the brain network to function more efficiently, offering protection against cognitive decline later in life [56]. Moreover, higher levels of education often lead to professions that involve cognitive challenges and practices, which could further improve or maintain the cognitive reserve in adulthood [57]. Consequently, given that malnutrition survivors are less likely to attain a high level of education, but also due to the fact that brain alterations become more significant as age advances [49], we believe that these malnutrition survivors could run a greater risk of developing senile dementia than the general population, as has been observed in other studies [8, 50, 57]. As such, tackling childhood malnutrition could have an impact on preventing dementia in LICs. It is therefore important to initiate early neurodevelopmental follow-up of SAM survivors in order to screen for any difficulties early on and to refer such cases to the appropriate health facilities.

In terms of self-esteem and self-reported academic performance, our results show that malnutrition survivors have a higher probability of having lower self-esteem as adults and of reporting poor academic performance in relation to their community controls. We believe that one reason for this is the fact that SAM is stigmatising in society. In addition, the occurrence of SAM is often linked with a precarious socio-economic status in Africa and, unfortunately, the majority of these subjects return to the same disadvantaged conditions after nutritional rehabilitation [8, 50, 57], which has a negative impact on education. Later, this lower level of education reduces the likelihood of accessing better-paid professions, exposing these subjects to precarious living conditions, to lower household spending and, lastly, a greater risk of poverty [16]. All this leads malnutrition survivors to have lower self-esteem than the general population, in addition to the poor academic performance they self-report.

Lastly, by comparing malnutrition survivors with community controls in terms of health-related disabilities in daily living (both on the social and functional level), we observed that malnutrition survivors had relatively few social problems in terms of getting on with those in their immediate environment, than their controls, contrary to our hypotheses. This suggests that malnutrition survivors are probably more resilient than their controls as they need social bonds due to the stigmatising nature of SAM in the community. Furthermore, community controls have relatively high self-esteem, boosted by a higher level of education and consequently have a tendency to believe they have the monopoly over knowledge. This would probably create much more problems for them in the community, unlike malnutrition survivors who may tend to be more submissive, and to be less involved in discussions due to the fact that they listen to the news less and use social networks less. Consequently, they are more attentive to what others say, do not draw attention to themselves due to their low self-esteem, and are therefore less likely to have social problems. However, on the functional level, no difference was observed. This is consistent with the findings of studies conducted in HMICs, which observed that undernutrition in childhood was not associated with disabilities in carrying out daily tasks (household and professional) in adulthood [58, 59]. This may be due to the benefit of nutritional rehabilitation and catch-up growth after treatment, promoting the social reintegration of malnutrition survivors by making them autonomous in daily life, despite their cognitive disabilities.

However, certain limitations in relation to our findings are worth mentioning. Firstly, our biggest limitation is the bias of ‘lost-to-follow-up’. Indeed, only 524 of the 1,981 subjects from the initial cohort were studied, and they may have different characteristics to those of the subjects not studied. It is therefore difficult for us to form an opinion on the impact of their data on negative long-term effects given that we do not have any information on their outcomes. Nevertheless, we estimate that this would not be significantly different to our main findings given that the characteristics on admission do not differ between those lost to follow-up and the subjects who were traced [29].

Secondly, the lack of information on the social and environmental conditions in which the participants grew up is another important limitation of the study. The study design is incapable of separating mechanisms due to SAM per se from mechanisms due to persistent effects of the child's early environment or persistent living in the same poor environment.

Thirdly, there is uncertainty as to whether all of the control recruited were in good health. Although they did not present with Kwashiorkor and were not treated for SAM, some of them may have presented with moderate malnutrition linked to unfavorable socio-economic conditions in the region, but not to the point of being admitted to a hospital. The constant unfavorable situation in which the two groups lived may have substantively affected any inter-group differences.

Fourthly, we used psychometric tests (MMSE and MMSE-I) that have not been validated in the Congolese population. Consequently, we do not know how much of an impact this had on the results. Nevertheless, having used a rigorous process with pre-tests and a pilot study to correct possible intercultural issues in terms of incomprehensibility or lack of clarity, we do not think that the lack of validation will have significantly altered our main conclusions.

Fifthly, we do not have demographic information concerning infancy, including gestational age, birth weight and height, rate of growth in the first two years of life, episodes of infectious diseases (particularly diarrhoeal) as well as socio-economic data concerning their mothers (level of education and age on birth). These items of information could be potential confounding factors, because they are linked with both malnutrition and negative long-term effects on education and cognition [60].

Sixthly, we have not assessed iron, folate and iodine status in our study. Given that SAM is associated with micronutrient deficiencies which are also risk factors for cognitive disabilities [60], we cannot exclude the possible effects of these deficiencies on the different cognitive disorders.

To conclude, survivors of childhood SAM have reduced human capital later in life in terms of education, self-esteem and cognitive function. However, they have less social disabilities in daily life and their daily activities are not compromised. Policy-deciders and funders seeking to promote economic growth and combat various complex psychological and medico-social disorders must be aware of the fact that appropriate investment in child health as regards SAM is an essential means to reducing the burden associated with extreme poverty and with the health costs of psychological and medico-social disorders.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Professor Philippe Hennart and the CEMUBAC team who initiated the system for collecting and computerizing data on malnutrition at Lwiro Hospital since 1988. Our thanks also go to the entire team of doctors and nurses who participated in the treatment of malnourished children between 1988 and 2007. We also thank the Van Buren Foundation which used to contribute to the functioning of Lwiro Hospital. Finally, we express gratitude to all community health workers for the data collection and administrative support during this work. We appreciate the support of Sud-Kivu Health authorities, CRSN authorities, and all village leaders involved in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This study is part of a Research for Development Project entitled: ‘Implementation study of a model of psycho-medico-social care at the health centre level: the case of people with chronic diseases and the mother-child malnourished couple, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo’ and funded by Belgian Development Cooperation through the Académie de Recherche et d’Enseignement Supérieur (ARES). JM received a grant from ARES.the funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report."

References

  • 1.WHO. children:reducing mortality. 2016. p. 178. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDonald CM, Olofin I, Flaxman S, Fawzi WW, Spiegelman D, Caulfield LE, et al. The effect of multiple anthropometric deficits on child mortality: meta-analysis of individual data in 10 prospective studies from developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(4):896–901. 10.3945/ajcn.112.047639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child under nutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61693-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Richter L, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):340–57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ampaabeng SK and Tan CM. The long-term cognitive consequences of early childhood malnutrition: The case of famine in Ghana. J Health Econ. 2013;32(6):1013–27. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Z, Gu D, and Hayward MD. Childhood nutritional deprivation and cognitive impairment among older Chinese people. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(5):941–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fink G and Rockers PC. Childhood growth, schooling, and cognitive development: further evidence from the Young Lives study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:182–8. 10.3945/ajcn.113.080960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song S, Wang W, Hu P. Famine, death, and madness: Schizophrenia in early adulthood after prenatal exposure to the Chinese Great Leap Forward Famine. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(7):1315–21. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang C, Phillips MR, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Shi Q, Song Z, et al. Malnutrition in Early Life and Adult Mental Health: Evidence From a Natural Experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2014;1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song Z, Zhang J, Ding Z, Martorell R, Zhang Y, Huang C, et al. Malnutrition in early life and adult mental health: Evidence from a natural experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2013;97:259–66. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lelijveld N, Seal A, Wells JC, Kirkby J, Opondo C, Chimwezi E, et al. Chronic disease outcomes after severe acute malnutrition in Malawian children (ChroSAM): a cohort study. Lancet Glob Heal. 2016;4(9):e654–62. 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30133-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Asiki G, Newton R, Marions L, Kamali A, Smedman L. The effect of childhood stunting and wasting on adolescent cardiovascular diseases risk and educational achievement in rural Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1). 10.1080/16549716.2019.1626184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akombi BJ, Agho KE, Hall JJ, Wali N, Renzaho AMN, Merom D. Stunting, Wasting and Underweight in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1–18. 10.3390/ijerph14080863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoddinott J, Behrman JR, Maluccio JA, Melgar P, Quisumbing AR, Ramirez-zea M, et al. Adult consequences of growth failure in early childhood. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1170–8. 10.3945/ajcn.113.064584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martorell R, Melgar P, Maluccio JA, Stein AD, Rivera JA. The Nutrition Intervention Improved Adult Human Capital and Economic Productivity 1, 2. J Nutr. 2018;411–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martínez R, Fernández A. Model for analysing the social and economic impact of child undernutrition in Latin America. CEPAL Serie Manuales. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Franke R.H.; Barrett G. The economic implications of malnutrition: Comment. Econ Dev Cult Chang. 1975;23:341–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wells JC, Sawaya AL, Wibaek R, Mwangome M, Poullas MS, Yajnik CS, et al. The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet. 2019;6736(19):1–14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32472-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.INS, USAID et UNICEF. MICS-Palu,RDC,2017–2018,rapport de résultats de l’enquête. 2019.
  • 22.UNICEF. Cinq questions à l’Unicef sur la malnutrition. République Démocratique du Congo. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Action Contre la Faim. Enquête Nutritionnelle Anthropométrique dans la Zone de Santé de Miti-Murhesa, Province du Sud-Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dramaix M, Hennart M, Brasseur D, Bahwere P, Mudjene O, Tonglet R DP et al. Serum albumin concentration, arm circumference, and oedema and subsequent risk of dying in children in central Africa lo. BMJ. 1993;307:710–3. 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Owino VO, Bahwere P, Bisimwa G, Mwangi CM, Collins S. Breast-milk intake of 9–10-mo-old rural infants given a ready-to-use complementary food in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo 1–3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93:1300–4. 10.3945/ajcn.110.006544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bisimwa G, Owino VO, Bahwere P, Dramaix M, Donnen P, Dibari F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a soybean-maize-sorghum–based ready-to-use complementary food paste on infant growth in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Am Soc Nutr. 2012;95:1157–64. 10.3945/ajcn.111.028704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fondu P, Hariga-Muller C, Mozes N, Neve J, Van Steirteghem A, Mandelbaum IM. Protein-energy malnutrition and anemia in Kivu. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978;31(1):46–56. 10.1093/ajcn/31.1.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Paluku B. Contribution à l’amelioration et à l’évaluation de la prise en charge globale de l’enfant hospitalisé en afrique centrale (Sud-Kivu). Université Libre de Bruxelles; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mwene-batu P, Bisimwa G, Ngaboyeka G, Dramaix M, Macq J, Lemogoum D, et al. Follow-up of a historic cohort of children treated for severe acute malnutrition between 1988 and 2007 in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):1–17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight- for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. Geneva; 2006.
  • 31.Korhonen J, Linnanmäki K, Aunio P. Learning difficulties, academic well-being and educational dropout: A person-centred approach. Learn Individ Differ. 2014;31:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaudonville T. L ‘impact de la qualité de vie sur les performances scolaires et le développement. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Derouesné C, Po J, Hugonot L, Kalafat M, Dubois B, Laurent B. Le Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): un outil pratique pour l’évaluation de l’état cognitif des patients par le clinicien Version française consensuelle. Presse Med. 1999;28:1141–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Folstein M., Folstein S. MPR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ertan T, Eker E GC and Güngen C. The standardised Mini-Mental Examination for illiterate Turkish elderly population. Paper presented at 2nd International Symposium on Neurophysiological and Neurophysiological Assessment of Mental and Behavioral Disorders, August 28–30, Kirazlıyayla, Burs. In 1999.
  • 36.Babacan-Yıldız G, Ur-Özçelik E, Kolukısa M, Işık AT, Gürsoy E, Kocaman G, et al. Validity and Reliability Studies of Modified Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-E) For Turkish Illiterate Patients with Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease. Turkish J psychiatry. 2015;1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bellaj T, Jemaa BS, Romdhane AN, Dhiffallah M, Ali BN, Bouaziz AM. Version arabe du mini mental state examination (A-MMSE): Fidélité, Validité et données normatives. Tunis Med. 2008;86(07):768–76.19472769 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schmitt DP and JA. Simultaneous Administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 Nations: Exploring the Universal and Culture-Specific Features of Global Self-Esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(4):623–42. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. 1965; [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Makhubela M, Mashegoane S. Psychological validation of the Rosenberg Self- Esteem Scale (RSES) in South Africa: Method effects and dimensionality in black African and white university students. J Psychol Africa. 2017; [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martín-albo J, Núñez JL, Navarro JG, Grijalvo F. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and Validation in University Students. Span J Psychol. 2007;10(2):458–67. 10.1017/s1138741600006727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Werfalli M, Kassanjee R, Kalula S, Kowal P, Phaswana-Mafuya N LN. Diabetes in south African older adults: prevalence and impact on quality of life and functional disability–as assessed using SAGE wave 1 data. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1449924 10.1080/16549716.2018.1449924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Malembaka EB, Karemere H, Balaluka GB, Lambert A, Muneza F, Deconinck H, et al. A new look at population health through the lenses of cognitive, functional and social disability clustering in eastern DR Congo: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(93):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gomez-Olive FX, Schröders J, Aboderin I, Byass P, Chatterji S DJ, Debpuur C, et al. Variations in disability and quality of life with age and sex between eight lower income and middleincome countries: data from the INDEPTH WHO-SAGE collaboratione. BMJ Glob Heal. 2017;2(4):000508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schneider M, Baron E, Davies T, Bass J LC. Making assessment locally relevant: measuring functioning for maternal depression in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(5):797–806. 10.1007/s00127-014-1003-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Habtamu K, Alem A, Medhin G, Fekadu A, Dewey M, Prince M HC. Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia. Heal Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):64 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Newman CJ, and Feldman R. Copyright and Open Access at the Bedside. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(26):2447–9. 10.1056/NEJMp1110652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martin R, O'Neill D. Taxing your memory. Lancet. 2009;373:2009–10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60349-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thompson JJ, Blair MR, Henrey AJ. Over the Hill at 24: Persistent Age-Related Cognitive- Motor Decline in Reaction Times in an Ecologically Valid Video Game Task Begins in Early Adulthood. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Moceri VM, Kukull WA, Emanuel I, van Belle G LE. Early-life risk factors and the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2000;54:415–20. 10.1212/wnl.54.2.415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sudfeld CR, Mccoy DC, Danaei G, Fink G, Ezzati M. Linear Growth and Child Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e1266 10.1542/peds.2014-3111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mendez MA, Adair LS. Severity and Timing of Stunting in the First Two Years of Life Affect Performance on Cognitive Tests in Late Childhood. J Nutr. 1999;129:1555–62. 10.1093/jn/129.8.1555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Somassè YE, Dramaix M, Bahwere P, Donnen P. Relapses from acute malnutrition and related factors in a community-based management programme in Burkina Faso. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12(pp):908–17. 10.1111/mcn.12197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Keita M. Pauvreté et arbitrage entre scolarisation et travail des enfants au Mali Moussa Keita. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cagney KA LD. Education, wealth, and cognitive function in later life. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 2002;57B:163–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fritsch T, McClendon MJ, Smyth KA, Lerner AJ, Friedland RP LJ. Cognitive functioning in healthy aging: the role of reserve and lifestyle factors early in life. Gerontologist. 2007;47(3):307–22. 10.1093/geront/47.3.307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Andel R, Kareholt I, Parker MG, Thorslund M GM. Complexity of primary lifetime occupation and cognition in advanced old age. J Aging Health. 2007;19:397–415. 10.1177/0898264307300171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Spence D, Alderdice FA, Stewart MC, Halliday HL, Bell AH. Does intrauterine growth restriction affect quality of life in adulthood? Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:700–3. 10.1136/adc.2006.102947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gascoin G, Flamant C. Conséquences à long terme des enfants nés dans un contexte de retard de croissance intra-utérin et / ou petits pour l ‘ âge gestationnel. J Gynecol Obstet Biol la Reprod. 2013;42(8):911–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McCarthy A, Hughes R, Tilling K, Davies D, Smith GD, Ben-Shlomo Y. Birth weight; postnatal, infant, and childhood growth; and obesity in young adulthood.pdf. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(4):907–13. 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Frédéric Denis

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

23 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-21141

Long-term effects of Severe Acute Malnutrition during childhood on adult cognitive, academic and behavioural development in African fragile countries: The Lwiro Cohort Study in Democratic Republic of the Congo

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Mwene-Batu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 07 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Frédéric Denis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The present manuscript summarises the findings of a retrospective case control study in the DRC. Despite the study limitations, the paper is a useful addition to the current literature and provide unique insights for public health from an understudied population.

The lack of information on the social and environmental conditions in which the participants grew up is an important limitation of the study. It is quite likely that the cases grew up in more disadvantaged child caring, social and living conditions which predisposed them to adverse development outcomes later in life. Although this is acknowledged briefly as a study limitation, I would like to see a stronger discussion on these aspects. For instance, did you assert that the controls grew up in the same villages as the cases? Did you assess malnutrition history in the controls? Please discuss possible bias.

In addition, more detail is needed regarding the selection of the control. “407 controls randomly selected from the community”. Confirm that this is the same community. In addition, explain how the random selection was done. There seems to be discrepancy with the sampling approach described in the next lines (which indicate not a random, but a systematic sampling).

Selection of subsample of the 200 participants for the assessment of the MMSE. Did you do this randomly? Are these both sub-samples also comparable in terms of socio-demographic conditions.

The findings of the analysis are essentially based on statistical difference. A discussion regarding the practical significance of these difference (vs the bias of assessment) would be informative.

Minor

Verify use of acronyms (and avoid where possible) Eg. Abstract: explain DRC, Chronic malnutrition (CM) abbreviated twice

Reference style needs to be consistent and verified (some first names are mentioned, some last names are all caps etc

Line 390 and following “This could be explained by the fact that” or “Another explanation could be the fact that” , “This could probably be explained by” could be removed to improve readability

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Carl Lachat

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244486.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Dec 2020

Dear Sir,

We submit the revised version of our manuscript entitled “Long-term effects of Severe Acute Malnutrition during childhood on adult cognitive, academic and behavioural development in African fragile countries: The Lwiro Cohort Study in Democratic Republic of the Congo” [PONE-D-20-21141] by Pacifique Mwene-Batu et al.

First of all, we would like to thank the Reviewer for his very insightful comments that helped improving the quality of the manuscript. We implemented his suggestions and comments, and provide below detailed answers:

Answers to reviewer

Reviewer #1: The present manuscript summarises the findings of a retrospective case control study in the DRC. Despite the study limitations, the paper is a useful addition to the current literature and provide unique insights for public health from an understudied population.

1) The lack of information on the social and environmental conditions in which the participants grew up is an important limitation of the study. It is quite likely that the cases grew up in more disadvantaged child caring, social and living conditions which predisposed them to adverse development outcomes later in life. Although this is acknowledged briefly as a study limitation, I would like to see a stronger discussion on these aspects. For instance, did you assert that the controls grew up in the same villages as the cases? Did you assess malnutrition history in the controls? Please discuss possible bias.

Answer: We thank the Reviewer for this pertinent remark and we accordingly have added some aspects in terms of limitations in the discussion to raise some points that were not clearly elucidated long before.

Please see Page 12, lines 436-444: “Secondly, the lack of information on the social and environmental conditions in which the participants grew up is another important limitation of the study. the study design is incapable of separating mechanisms due to SAM per se from mechanisms due to persistent effects of the child's early environment or persistent living in the same poor environment.

Thirdly, there is uncertainty as to whether all of the control recruited were in good health. Although they did not present with Kwashiorkor and were not treated for SAM, some of them may have presented with moderate malnutrition linked to unfavorable socio-economic conditions in the region, but not to the point of being admitted to a hospital. The constant unfavorable situation in which the two groups lived may substantively affected any inter-group differences”

2) In addition, more detail is needed regarding the selection of the control. “407 controls randomly selected from the community”. Confirm that this is the same community. In addition, explain how the random selection was done. There seems to be discrepancy with the sampling approach described in the next lines (which indicate not a random, but a systematic sampling).

R/ Thanks for the suggestion.

We confirm that controls were from the same community as cases. We have clarified this in the revised version of manuscript. See page 3, lines 149-150: “…these survivors were compared with 407 controls randomly selected from the same community [29]”.

The random selection of the control group has been explained in the manuscript, on page 3 lines 151-155: “The community control was defined as a subject who had not been admitted to HPL for SAM, was the same sex, was living in the same community, and was no more than 24 months younger or older than the case. To identify these subjects, community health workers (CHWs) spun a bottle at the case’s home, then went door to door starting with the nearest house in the direction shown by the bottle until they found a subject that met the criteria [29]”.

3) Selection of subsample of the 200 participants for the assessment of the MMSE. Did you do this randomly?

R/ Thanks for the question.

As mentioned in the manuscript, we limited the cognitive function evaluation (using the MMSE) only 200 participants because of financial reasons. In fact, the MMSE test is copyrighted. Clinicians and researchers have to pay for its usage. Due to limited funds, we could afford only the cost of 200 tests.

To choose the 200 participants (including 100 cases and 100 controls), we first decided to include only participants aged 25 years and above. This threshold was chosen as most subjects are supposed to have completed their studies at this age. Furthermore, it has been reported that some changes occur in neurons in terms of aging, and these changes start beyond the age of 25.

Out of a total of 931 participants (524 cases and 407 controls) aged 25 years and above, 200 were selected as follows:

1°. Firstly, the reduced choice of subjects is explained by the fact that the use of the MMSE is paid for when our means were limited, which is why we wanted to do it in a subgroup.

2°. Second, in terms of subgroup identification, we thought it would be best to consider an age at which subjects would have already completed most of the studies and at which certain changes in neurons occur in terms of aging. That is why we took into account the age of 25 years.

3°. Finally, taking into account age 25 years and above as inclusion criteria in this subgroup for the MMSE, we identified 100 cases among the 524 at baseline (identified) as well as 100 controls among the 407 (randomly identified at baseline), of comparable age and sex and living in the same community.

This was explained in the revised manuscript of line 273 to 281.

“Due to copyright on the use of the MMSE [47,48] and our limited means, we only used it in a subgroup. To select them, we took subjects who were older than 25 years old and of comparable sex, regardless of their level of education. According to this criteria, out of the initial 524 cases, only 100 were selected. A total of 100 individuals aged more than 25 years, out of the initial 407, were selected as controls. This threshold was used because, beyond the age of 25, humans start to lose their first neurons and a slight decrease in cognitive performance can be observed: decline in memory efficiency, slight slowing of thought, more difficult perception and slower perceptual identification, etc. [49]. In addition, at age 25, an individual is expected to have completed his or her education in our context”.

4) Are these both sub-samples also comparable in terms of socio-demographic conditions.

R/Thanks for the question.

With regard to the socio-demographic characteristics of the different individuals in the subgroup, prior analyses were done to see if there were any differences in education between the two subgroups that could justify the observed difference in scores. After analysis, no difference in educational attainment was observed between cases and controls for the educated. For the uneducated, this was not necessary.

Below are the results comparing education between cases and controls for the educated.

Cases Community Controls p-value

N (total) % N (total) %

Level of education 50 72

None

Primary 38.0 36.1 �����

Secondary 62.0 59.7

University 0.0 4.2

Minor

Verify use of acronyms (and avoid where possible) Eg. Abstract: explain DRC, Chronic malnutrition (CM) abbreviated twice.

Reference style needs to be consistent and verified (some first names are mentioned, some last names are all caps etc.

Line 390 and following “This could be explained by the fact that” or “Another explanation could be the fact that”, “This could probably be explained by” could be removed to improve readability.

R/ Thanks for the remarks.

All comments, suggestions and instructions have been implemented into the revised version.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers-PONE-D-20-21141.docx

Decision Letter 1

Frédéric Denis

11 Dec 2020

Long-term effects of Severe Acute Malnutrition during childhood on adult cognitive, academic and behavioural development in African fragile countries: The Lwiro Cohort Study in Democratic Republic of the Congo

PONE-D-20-21141R1

Dear Dr. Mwene-Batu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Frédéric Denis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Frédéric Denis

16 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-21141R1

Long-term effects of Severe Acute Malnutrition during childhood on adult cognitive, academic and behavioural development in African fragile countries: The Lwiro Cohort Study in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Dear Dr. Mwene-Batu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Frédéric Denis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers-PONE-D-20-21141.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES