Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244792

Intense light as anticoagulant therapy in humans

Yoshimasa Oyama 1, Sydney Shuff 1, Pavel Davizon-Castillo 2, Nathan Clendenen 1, Tobias Eckle 1,*
Editor: Paul A Bartell3
PMCID: PMC7775081  PMID: 33382840

Abstract

Blood coagulation is central to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury. Studies on the light elicited circadian rhythm protein Period 2 (PER2) using whole body Per2-/- mice found deficient platelet function and reduced clotting which would be expected to protect from myocardial IR-injury. In contrast, intense light induction of PER2 protected from myocardial IR-injury while Per2 deficiency was detrimental. Based on these conflicting data, we sought to evaluate the role of platelet specific PER2 in coagulation and myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. We demonstrated that platelets from mice with tissue-specific deletion of Per2 in the megakaryocyte lineage (Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE) significantly clot faster than platelets from control mice. We further found increases in infarct sizes or plasma troponin levels in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice when compared to controls. As intense light increases PER2 protein in human tissues, we also performed translational studies and tested the effects of intense light therapy on coagulation in healthy human subjects. Our human studies revealed that intense light therapy repressed procoagulant pathways in human plasma samples and significantly reduced the clot rate. Based on these results we conclude that intense light elicited PER2 has an inhibitory function on platelet aggregation in mice. Further, we suggest intense light as a novel therapy to prevent or treat clotting in a clinical setting.

Introduction

The role of platelets in the thrombotic occlusion of coronary vessels leading to myocardial ischemia is well understood [13]. Further, microembolization and platelet accumulation within the affected microcirculation of the myocardium during ischemia and reperfusion (IR) lead to secondary tissue damage [2, 3]. Interestingly, the early morning surge in blood pressure is accompanied by endothelial dysfunction, a peak in clinical thrombosis, and adverse cardiovascular events [4, 5]. These events correspond to oscillations in circadian gene and protein expressions, implicating a critical role of the circadian clock in these processes [69].

The circadian ‘master’ clock in mammals is in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). A hallmark of the mammalian circadian pacemaker is its ability to be synchronized by light [10]. Photic stimuli are transmitted from the retina to target neurons in the brain, where they are transduced to the molecular clockwork [11, 12]. Light activation of melanopsin receptors in the retinal ganglion cells leads to the transcriptional induction of Period 2 (PER2) and concomitant synchronization. Peripheral tissues display oscillations in PER2 expression similar to those of the brain [13, 14], probably through secreted signaling molecules [11, 15, 16]. Only light with an intensity >180 LUX can synchronize the human circadian system [17], where intense light (>10,000 LUX) is most effective.

Recently, the light-regulated circadian rhythm protein PER2 was identified as a critical endogenous protective mechanism to dampen the consequences of myocardial IR injury [14, 1820]. Studies using tissue-specific mouse models for Per2 identified a specific role for endothelial expressed PER2 in intense light elicited protection from myocardial IR injury [18]. Further, human studies found intense light elicited increases of PER2 protein and associated PER2-mechanisms [18].

Studies evaluating the role of PER2 for platelet function using PER2 whole body deficient mice found that PER2 deficiency was associated with a defective platelet function [21]. It was found that Per2-/- mice had prolonged bleeding times and platelet aggregation in vitro was significantly compromised in Per2-/- mice. As compromised platelet aggregation reduces myocardial IR-injury [22], these findings stand in contrast to recent findings on PER2 as an endogenous protective mechanism during myocardial ischemia [18]. Thus, we thought to investigate the tissue-specific role of PER2 for platelets. Using a recently described floxed mouse model for PER2 [18] we generated a tissue-specific mouse with a Per2 deletion in the megakaryocyte lineage using the Platelet factor 4 (PF4) Cre recombinase mouse [23]. Using this novel mouse line, we evaluated platelet numbers, in vitro platelet aggregation, and myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in vivo. Also, we used intense light therapy which increases PER2 in human tissues and studied the effects of light on human plasma proteins and blood clotting. These studies reveal novel insights into the role of intense light elicited PER2 for blood clot formation.

Material and methods

Mouse experiments

Experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee [IACUC]) at the University of Colorado Denver, USA. They were following the AAALAC regulations, the US Department of Agriculture Animal Welfare Act, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the NIH. All mice were housed in a 14 h (hours):10 h L(light):D(dark) cycle and we routinely used 12- to 16-week old male mice. To be able to compare new data with previous findings a LD14:10 light cycle was chosen which is the standard housing condition at the University of Colorado. Moreover, a LD14:10 cycle is commonly used and recommend by Jackson Laboratories to reduce mouse stress. All mice had a C57BL/6J background. C57BL/6J, Per2-/- [Per2tm1Brd Tyrc-Brd/J [24]], mice were purchased from Jackson laboratories. Per2loxp/loxp were generated by Ozgene (Perth, Australia) [18]. PF4-CRE [C57BL/6-Tg(Pf4-icre)Q3Rsko/J [23]], Lyz2-CRE [B6.129P2-Lyz2tm1(cre)Ifo/J [25]], tamoxifen-inducible Myosin-CRE [Tg(Myh6-cre/Esr1*)1Jmk/J [26]] or VE-Cadherin-Cre [B6.Cg-Tg(Cdh5-cre)7Mlia/J [27]] were purchased from Jackson laboratories. To obtain platelet, bone marrow, myocyte, or endothelial tissue-specific mice, we crossbred Per2loxp/loxp mice with the PF4-Cre, Lyz2-Cre, Myosin-Cre, or VE-Cadherin-Cre recombinase mouse. All mouse experiments were conducted at the same time point (ZT8, Zeitgeber Time corresponding to 2 PM based on ‘light ON’ at 6 AM) unless specified otherwise. Mice were bred in the vivarium at Denver for optimal acclimatization and housed in cages of 5 at 21°C with food (Harlan diets, formulation 2920x, soy-free) and water ad libitum. As studies have shown that thrombotic vascular occlusion in mice is circadian controlled and significantly slowed down at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 8 [28], we chose this time point for our all studies on murine platelet aggregation.

Platelet aggregation

Human blood was obtained by venipuncture into Vacutainer EDTA tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) from healthy volunteers. Blood sample from mice was drawn by cardiac puncture with sodium citrate. The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was separated by centrifugation at 100 x g for 10 min, and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was collected by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 20 min. Platelet counts in PRP were adjusted to 2.5×105/μl with PPP. PRP was stirred (1200 rpm) at 37°C in a Chrono-log model 700 (Chronolog, Havertown, PA). Aggregation was induced with 2μg/ml of collagen or 5μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Aggregation was recorded as the percent change in light transmission using Aggrolink software (Chronolog, Havertown, PA).

Murine model for cardiac ischemia

Murine in situ myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury (60-min ischemia/120 min reperfusion) and troponin-I (cTnI) measurements were performed as described [2931]. Infarct sizes were determined by calculating the percentage of infarcted myocardium to the area at risk (AAR) using a double staining technique with Evan’s blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride. AAR and the infarct size were determined via planimetry using the NIH software Image 1.0 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA). For troponin I (cTnI) measurements blood was collected by central venous puncture and cTnI was analyzed using a quantitative rapid cTnI assay (Life Diagnostics, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA). Note: cTnI is highly specific for myocardial ischemia and has a well-documented correlation with the infarct size in mice [29, 3133] and humans [34].

Human light exposure

Based on strategies using intense light therapy [10,000 LUX] to treat seasonal mood disorders in humans [35], we adopted a similar protocol. Timing of light therapy has been shown to be critical as light therapy e.g. if given at night can cause insomnia and hyperactivity and therefore the morning hours are recommended. Healthy human volunteers were exposed to intense light (10,000 LUX) for 30 min every morning for five days from 8:30 AM– 9:00 AM. 5 mL blood was drawn on day one at 8:30 AM and 9:00 AM (before and after light exposure). While light exposure was repeated every morning for the five days, the next blood draws were on days three and five at 9:00 AM as indicated. Blood was collected in EDTA-plasma tubes and spun at 3,000 rpm for 8 minutes to separate plasma. We obtained approval from the Institutional Review Board (COMIRB #13–1607) for our human studies before written informed consent from everyone was obtained. A total of 6 healthy volunteers were enrolled (3 females and 3 males) [36].

Proteomics screen

We analyzed plasma samples on day 1, day 3, and day 5 from healthy human volunteers exposed to 30 minutes of intense light in the morning on 5 consecutive days using the Slow Off-rate Aptamer (SOMAmer)-based capture array called SOMAscan [37, 38] (SomaLogic, Inc., CO, USA). The SOMAscan uses a protein signal present in the human plasma and transforms it into a nucleotide signal that can be quantified using fluorescence on microarrays. The SOMAscan assay is one of the most comprehensive protein discovery tools available and measures 1319 plasma proteins (full list of light-regulated proteins published in [36]).

Sonoclot coagulation analyzer

To measure clot formation and strength as well as the interaction between platelet and fibrin, a Sonoclot Coagulation Analyzer, a viscoelastic test instrument, was used with a glass bead test (Sienco® gbACT Kit) [39]. Citrated blood was re-calcified moments prior to the test assays to reverse the citrate’s anticoagulant effect. An aliquot of 1 mL of citrated blood was mixed with 40 μL of CaCl2 0.25 M and then 330 μL of the re-calcified blood was added to the cuvette. A probe moves up and down along the vertical axis and as the sample starts to clot, changes in impedance to movement are measured. The time-based graph (Sonoclot signature) that is generated reflects different steps in the clotting of the whole blood sample in three different variables. Test variability of the Sonoclot analyses was determined to be 6–10%. The following variables were measured, with the defined normal values in parentheses: Activated clotting time (ACT) (100−155 s) is the time required for the first fibrin to form. Clot rate (CR) (9−35 units/min) is the rate of increase in the clot impedance due to fibrin formation and polymerization [39].

Data analysis

Two groups comparisons were analyzed using a Student’s t-test. The protein array data were analyzed via linear regression with false discovery rate correction of the p values using the Benjamini and Hochberg method to control for multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean (±SD). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to confirm normal distribution. For statistical analysis, GraphPad Prism 7.0 or JMP 14 software were used.

Results

Platelet counts in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice are unchanged

Studies using whole-body Per2 deficient mice found increased bleeding time, compromised platelet function, and reduced total platelet counts [21]. To further understand the role of PER2 for platelet function we used a novel floxed mouse model for PER2 [18] (Fig 1) and crossbred Per2loxP/loxP with the platelet factor 4 (PF4)-CRE mouse [23] to obtain a tissue-specific deletion of Per2 exclusively in the megakaryocytic lineage (Fig 1). As studies in Per2 whole-body knockout mice found reduced platelet counts when compared to controls, we first analyzed platelet numbers and mean platelet volume in blood samples from Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE mice. As shown in Fig 1, platelet counts, or mean platelet volume did not differ between Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE controls. However, Per2-/- had indeed lower platelet numbers as seen in previous studies. Together, tissue-specific deletion of Per2 in the megakaryocytic lineage does not change blood platelet counts.

Fig 1. Platelet counts in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice.

Fig 1

(A) Per2loxp/loxp -strategy: deletion of exons 10, 11 and 12 in the Per2 gene removes half of the PAS2 domain and all the PAC domain. This deletion also results in a frameshift mutation introducing an early stop codon. (B) Generation of mice with a tissue-specific deletion of Per2 exclusively in the megakaryocytic lineage. (C) Platelet numbers and mean platelet volume 9MPV) from PF4-CRE, Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and Per2-/- mice (mean±SD, n = 3–4).

Increased platelet aggregation in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice

We next isolated platelets from Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE controls and analyzed ADP mediated platelet aggregation using an aggregometer. As studies have shown that thrombotic vascular occlusion in mice is circadian controlled and significantly slowed down at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 8, which is abolished in Clock mutant mice [28], we chose this time point for our following studies. We demonstrated that ADP mediated platelet aggregation from isolated Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE-platelets was significantly enhanced at ZT8 when compared to platelets isolated from PF4-CRE controls (Fig 2). Similarly, collagen-induced platelet aggregation was also significantly increased in platelets from Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice at ZT8 (Fig 2). Together, platelet aggregation is significantly enhanced in platelets isolated from mice with tissue-specific deletion of Per2 in the megakaryocytic lineage at ZT8.

Fig 2. Platelet aggregation in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice.

Fig 2

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained from Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE controls. Aggregation was induced with 5μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (A-C) or 2μg/ml of collagen (D-F) and recorded as the percent change in light transmission using an aggregometer (mean±SD; n = 6).

Increased myocardial damage in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice

After we found enhanced platelet clot formation at ZT8 in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE, we next exposed Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE controls to in-situ myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury at ZT8. We exposed mice to 60 minutes of myocardial ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion using a hanging weight system [30]. Following reperfusion, mouse cardiac tissue was stained using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). As shown in Fig 3, Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE had lager infarct sizes than PF4-CRE controls, which was however not significant (54%±7% vs 45%±7%, mean±SD, p = 0.1087). Similarly, plasma troponin levels were also -but not significantly- increased in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice (204±94 ng/ml vs 110±67 ng/ml, mean±SD, p = 0.1). Together, while not significant, Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice have larger infarct sizes and serum troponin levels following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury at ZT8 when compared to controls.

Fig 3. Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE mice.

Fig 3

Infarct sizes (A) or serum troponin-I (D) in Per2loxP/loxP-PF4-CRE and PF4-CRE controls mice after 60 min of in situ myocardial ischemia and 2h reperfusion at ZT8. (B-C) Representative infarct staining (mean±SD; n = 5).

Intense light therapy inhibits procoagulant pathways in humans

Based on reports that humans clot more in the early morning than in the afternoon [40], we next compared platelet aggregation in humans at 9 AM versus 4 PM. Indeed, as shown in Fig 4, platelet aggregation was enhanced at 9 AM vs 4 PM in healthy human subjects. As 9 AM appeared to be the time point where therapy would be desirable, we next evaluated intense light therapy as a strategy to reduce coagulation in healthy human subjects at 9 AM (Fig 4). Recent studies demonstrated that 5 days of intense light therapy enhances PER2 protein expression in tissue samples from healthy human subjects at 9 AM [18]. Using the SomaScan protein array, we analyzed intense light-regulated plasma proteins following 5 days of 30 minutes intense light therapy between 8.30–9.00 AM [36]. Several pathway analyses, as shown in Fig 4, indicated that intense light significantly inhibited procoagulant pathways. As shown in Fig 5, volcano plot analysis of our proteomics screen confirmed the findings of our pathway analyses and suggested a strong regulation of platelet factor 4 (PF4) by intense light. Taken together, intense light therapy, which increases PER2 in humans, inhibits procoagulant proteins in human plasma samples.

Fig 4. Proteomics from human plasma samples after intense light therapy.

Fig 4

(A) Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained from human healthy volunteers. Aggregation was induced with 1 μl/ml collagen and recorded as the percent change in light transmission using an aggregometer. (B) Healthy human volunteers were exposed to 30 minutes of intense light (10,000 Lux) at 8:30 AM on 5 consecutive days. A blood draw was performed before light exposure on the first day (8:30 AM) and 3 or 5 days after light exposure (9.00 AM). Plasma samples were analyzed using the SOMAscan platform. (C) Reactome analysis of intense light-regulated proteins. (D) Ingenuity analysis of intense light-regulated proteins. (E) All light-regulated proteins affecting coagulation (n = 3 individual subjects, n = 12 of total samples/arrays).

Fig 5. Volcano plot analysis of a proteomic screen from human plasma sample following intense light therapy.

Fig 5

Healthy human volunteers were exposed to 30 minutes of intense light (10,000 Lux) at 8:30 AM on 5 consecutive days. A blood draw was performed before light exposure on the first day (8:30 AM) and 3 or 5 days after light exposure (9.00 AM). Plasma samples were analyzed using the SOMAscan platform. Shown are volcano pot analyses of the all light regulated proteins. Red arrows mark the strong effect of intense light on platelet factor 4 (PF4; n = 3 individual subjects, n = 12 of total samples/arrays).

Intense light therapy inhibits clot rate in humans

After we found that intense light inhibited procoagulant proteins in human plasma samples, we next tested the effect of intense light on whole blood coagulation using the Sonoclot. As shown in Fig 6, 30 minutes of intense light therapy on day one demonstrated an immediate effect on activated clotting time (initial phase, the time required for the first fibrin to form, non-platelet dependent) and clot rate (second phase, the rate of increase in the clot impedance, platelet dependent). After 5 days of intense light therapy, the clot rate was further significantly reduced when compared to post light treatment on day 1. However, activated clotting time on day 5 returned to baseline values from day 1 (Fig 6). Together, 5 days of intense light therapy significantly reduces the clot rate in healthy human subjects.

Fig 6. Whole blood coagulation studies in human subjects during intense light therapy.

Fig 6

Healthy human volunteers were exposed to 30 minutes of intense light (10,000 Lux) at 8:30 AM on 5 consecutive days. A blood draw was performed before light exposure on the first day (8:30 AM) and 3 or 5 days after light exposure (9.00 AM). Activated clotting time (ACT) and Clot rate (CR) were determined from whole blood using the Sonoclot Coagulation Analyzer (mean±SD; n = 6 individual subjects).

Discussion

Acute coronary thrombosis can result in nonfatal myocardial infarction or sudden death [41]. This process is well defined in patients with heart failure, patients with coronary artery disease, and those dying of sudden cardiac death. Circadian mechanisms regarding thrombosis have been reported but are not well defined due to the lack of tissue-specific studies [24, 42]. In the current study we observed that tissue-specific deletion of the circadian and light-regulated protein PER2 in the megakaryocyte lineage results in increased platelet aggregation and increased myocardial damage. Further, we demonstrated that intense light therapy -which increases PER2 protein tissue levels- inhibited procoagulant pathways and reduced the clot rate in healthy human subjects.

Mechanistic studies on how circadian proteins influence coagulation are scarce. Moreover, most studies have used whole body knockout mouse models evaluating the circadian clock in hemostasis. As such, a study using whole-body Per2 knockout mice found that Per2-null mice had reduced platelet counts and platelets were compromised in their ability to aggregate [21]. Furthermore, an ultrastructural examination of Per2-null megakaryocytes revealed many vacuoles in demarcation membranes and a reduction in platelet granules [21].

In a different study, it was found that there was a diurnal rhythm in the expression of thrombopoietin in wildtype mice while in Clock mutant mice thrombopoietin expression was disrupted [42]. In contrast to the study using whole body Per2-/- mice, however, Clock mutant mice showed an increase in thrombopoietin, a significant increase in megakaryocyte numbers and significant higher platelet counts at ZT8. Unfortunately, no analysis of the platelet function was performed.

In our current study using mice with a Per2 deletion in the megakaryocyte lineage, we did not see changes in platelet counts but found increased platelet aggregation at ZT8. We chose this time point as wildtype mice have prolonged thrombotic vascular occlusion times (reduced clotting) at ZT8 [28]. Indeed, Clock mutant mice show abolished diurnal variation of thrombotic vascular occlusion with enhanced in vivo thrombosis at ZT8 [28].

Another study using whole-body Bmal1-/- found enhanced platelet aggregation upon ADP stimulation [43]. Surprisingly, disruption of endothelial BMAL1 expression was found to significantly shorten thrombotic vascular occlusion at ZT8 [28]. These data indicate that different clock proteins control different functions in different tissues. Further, these data show that results from whole-body null mice affecting circadian core clock proteins are difficult to interpret. Nevertheless, all these studies highlight a critical role of the circadian system in thrombosis generation.

The contribution of platelet activation to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury has been well documented [1]. Transfusion of myocardial ischemia-activated platelets from wildtype into wildtype mice resulted in increased myocardial damage [1]. Possible mechanisms include upregulation of platelet surface receptors and release of immunomodulatory mediators, microembolization or modification of the cardiac vascular endothelium, which all can lead to aggravation of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury [44]. While in the current studies we found that a tissue-specific deletion of the circadian and light-regulated protein PER2 in the megakaryocyte lineage results in increased platelet aggregation, the myocardial damage, however, was moderate. In fact, this is in line with recent studies that found endothelial expressed PER2 as the dominant player in protection from myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury [18]. On the other side, PER2 appears to play an important role during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in general, as tissue-specific deletion of Per2 in myocytes, bone marrow cells, megakaryocytes or endothelial cells increase myocardial damage (Fig 3, S1 Fig). Future studies would have to test the interaction and the importance of PER2 in different tissues and analyze thrombotic vascular occlusion in mice that are deficient in endothelial PER2.

The importance of light as a regulator of the circadian system has been well described [8, 9, 16, 18, 20]. Our group recently found that intense light provides robust protection from myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury [18]. These studies identified endothelial expressed Per2 as a critical component of intense light-mediated cardioprotection. Interestingly, studies on platelet turnover found that megakaryopoiesis is regulated by light signals emanating from the master oscillator within the SCN of the hypothalamus [45]. Our studies have shown that light increases PER2 levels in peripheral tissues in mice and humans [18]. Based on these observations we evaluated intense light as a therapy to increase PER2 and to possibly affect coagulation. We found that intense light creates an anti-thrombotic signature in plasma samples and that the clot rate, which is platelet dependent, is significantly reduced after 5 days of intense light therapy in human healthy subjects. Despite our first promising results from healthy human subjects, further research will be necessary to understand the mechanisms of intense light in inhibiting coagulation fully.

While mice are nocturnal and humans are diurnal, our group has shown that myocardial ischemia leads to bigger infarct sizes and plasma troponin values in the early morning hours like studies in humans [46]. In fact, circadian rhythms function independently of a diurnal or nocturnal behavior due to multiple yet parallel outputs from the SCN [47]. As such, very basic features of the circadian system are the same in apparently diurnal and nocturnal animals, including the molecular oscillatory machinery and the mechanisms responsible for pacemaker entrainment by light [47]. Further, we have shown that PER2 levels reciprocally correlate with infarct sizes and troponin levels in mice and men [14, 18]. These findings highlight that activity levels do not affect the diurnal pattern of myocardial ischemia events, as proposed by some authors that the increased morning incidence of myocardial ischemia in humans is purely stress related [48]. Also, PER2 is hypoxia-regulated in mice and humans, which supports similar biological roles in both species [14]. Further, important hypoxia adaptive mechanism such as hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1A) regulation and function are PER2 dependent [49] and also seem to be independent of a nocturnal nature [50], despite HIF1A expression being under circadian control [51]. Indeed, human and mouse studies on HIF1A find similar responses to cardiovascular ischemic events [50].

Our data are not without limitations and should be interpreted with caution. While we found an anti-thrombotic effect of intense light elicited PER2 or intense light in mice or humans, respectively, differences in size and physiology, as well as variations in the homology of targets between mice and humans, may lead to translational limitations. Further limitations of our work are small sample sizes, only using one time point for mice or human studies and not evaluating clotting events in humans in the evening following intense light exposure in the morning. Moreover, the anti-thrombotic signature observed in human plasma might not reflect the real coagulation status. Besides, low sample size and test limitations (selection of 1319 proteins) of our proteomics platform might make our conclusions on light having an impact on humans appear premature. Nevertheless, we have analyzed 12 plasma samples from 4 healthy volunteers over a week in our SomaScan assay. For our clotting studies using the Sonoclot, we analyzed whole blood from 6 healthy subjects over one week. While intense light therapy has been validated for the treatment of seasonal disorders, studies on the biological effects of intense light are scarce. In fact, to our knowledge, there are no studies that have performed a wide protein screen from plasma samples following intense light therapy in humans. The SOMAscan platform, which we chose, is a highly multiplexed, aptamer-based assay optimized for protein biomarker discovery, which is made possible by the simultaneous measurement of a broad range of protein targets. This assay has been successful in the identification of biomarker signatures in a variety of recent biomedical applications [52]. As such, despite the limitations of our analysis, our results will hopefully stimulate future research on the role of intense light therapy in the regulation of pro or anti-coagulant processes.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that tissue-specific deletion of Per2 in the megakaryocyte lineage increases platelet aggregation and thus, PER2 could represent a novel drug target to treat procoagulant disease states. Further, our human studies indicate that intense light -which is the dominant regulator of circadian rhythms and PER2- could potentially be a novel therapy to prevent or treat blood clotting in a clinical setting.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Myocardial ischemia in mice with a tissue specific deletion in endothelia, myocytes or bone marrow.

Serum troponin-I from Per2loxP/loxP-VE Cadherin Cre (endothelial specific), Per2loxP/loxP-Myosin Cre (cardiomyocyte sepcfic), Per2loxP/loxP-Lyz2 Cre (bone marrow specific) after 60 min of in situ myocardial ischemia and 2h reperfusion (mean±SD; n = 5).

(PDF)

Data Availability

Data are uploaded to figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13424414.

Funding Statement

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH-NHLBI) 5R01HL122472 Grant to TE and American Heart Association (AHA) Postdoctoral Fellowship 19POST34380105 to YO.

References

  • 1.Xu Y, Huo Y, Toufektsian MC, Ramos SI, Ma Y, Tejani AD, et al. Activated platelets contribute importantly to myocardial reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290(2):H692–9. Epub 2005/10/04. 10.1152/ajpheart.00634.2005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gawaz M. Role of platelets in coronary thrombosis and reperfusion of ischemic myocardium. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(3):498–511. Epub 2004/02/14. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.036 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eltzschig HK, Eckle T. Ischemia and reperfusion—from mechanism to translation. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1391–401. 10.1038/nm.2507 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paschos GK, FitzGerald GA. Circadian clocks and vascular function. Circ Res. 2010;106(5):833–41. Epub 2010/03/20. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211706 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White WB. Cardiovascular risk and therapeutic intervention for the early morning surge in blood pressure and heart rate. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6(2):63–72. Epub 2001/07/04. 10.1097/00126097-200104000-00001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takeda N, Maemura K. Circadian clock and vascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2010;33(7):645–51. Epub 2010/05/08. 10.1038/hr.2010.68 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartman CM, Eckle T. Circadian-Hypoxia Link and its Potential for Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(10):1075–90. Epub 2019/05/18. 10.2174/1381612825666190516081612 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brainard J, Gobel M, Scott B, Koeppen M, Eckle T. Health implications of disrupted circadian rhythms and the potential for daylight as therapy. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):1170–5. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000596 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brainard J, Gobel M, Bartels K, Scott B, Koeppen M, Eckle T. Circadian rhythms in anesthesia and critical care medicine: potential importance of circadian disruptions. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;19(1):49–60. 10.1177/1089253214553066 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jakubcakova V, Oster H, Tamanini F, Cadenas C, Leitges M, van der Horst GT, et al. Light entrainment of the mammalian circadian clock by a PRKCA-dependent posttranslational mechanism. Neuron. 2007;54(5):831–43. Epub 2007/06/08. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takahashi JS, Hong HK, Ko CH, McDearmon EL. The genetics of mammalian circadian order and disorder: implications for physiology and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(10):764–75. Epub 2008/09/20. 10.1038/nrg2430 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guler AD, Ecker JL, Lall GS, Haq S, Altimus CM, Liao HW, et al. Melanopsin cells are the principal conduits for rod-cone input to non-image-forming vision. Nature. 2008;453(7191):102–5. Epub 2008/04/25. 10.1038/nature06829 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bendova Z, Sumova S. Photoperiodic regulation of PER1 and PER2 protein expression in rat peripheral tissues. Physiol Res. 2006;55(6):623–32. Epub 2006/02/25. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eckle T, Hartmann K, Bonney S, Reithel S, Mittelbronn M, Walker LA, et al. Adora2b-elicited Per2 stabilization promotes a HIF-dependent metabolic switch crucial for myocardial adaptation to ischemia. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):774–82. 10.1038/nm.2728 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang J, Kaasik K, Blackburn MR, Lee CC. Constant darkness is a circadian metabolic signal in mammals. Nature. 2006;439(7074):340–3. Epub 2006/01/20. 10.1038/nature04368 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bonney S, Hughes K, Harter PN, Mittelbronn M, Walker L, Eckle T. Cardiac period 2 in myocardial ischemia: clinical implications of a light dependent protein. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(3):667–71. 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.12.022 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lewy AJ, Wehr TA, Goodwin FK, Newsome DA, Markey SP. Light suppresses melatonin secretion in humans. Science. 1980;210(4475):1267–9. Epub 1980/12/12. 10.1126/science.7434030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oyama Y, Bartman CM, Bonney S, Lee JS, Walker LA, Han J, et al. Intense Light-Mediated Circadian Cardioprotection via Transcriptional Reprogramming of the Endothelium. Cell Rep. 2019;28(6):1471–84 e11. Epub 2019/08/08. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.020 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oyama Y, Bartman CM, Gile J, Sehrt D, Eckle T. The circadian PER2 enhancer Nobiletin reverses the deleterious effects of midazolam in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury. Curr Pharm Des. 2018. Epub 2018/09/25. 10.2174/1381612824666180924102530 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bartman CM, Oyama Y, Brodsky K, Khailova L, Walker L, Koeppen M, et al. Intense light-elicited upregulation of miR-21 facilitates glycolysis and cardioprotection through Per2-dependent mechanisms. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176243 Epub 2017/04/28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176243 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Wang S, Hua Z, Zhang J. The clock gene Per2 is required for normal platelet formation and function. Thromb Res. 2011;127(2):122–30. Epub 2010/12/28. 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.11.025 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weig HJ, Bott-Flügel L, Städele C, Winter K, Schmidt R, Gawaz M, et al. Impaired platelet function reduces myocardial infarct size in Galphaq knock-out mice in vivo. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44(1):143–50. Epub 2007/11/21. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.09.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tiedt R, Schomber T, Hao-Shen H, Skoda RC. Pf4-Cre transgenic mice allow the generation of lineage-restricted gene knockouts for studying megakaryocyte and platelet function in vivo. Blood. 2007;109(4):1503–6. Epub 2006/10/13. 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020362 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zheng B, Larkin DW, Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Sage M, Eichele G, et al. The mPer2 gene encodes a functional component of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature. 1999;400(6740):169–73. Epub 1999/07/17. 10.1038/22118 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Forster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8(4):265–77. Epub 2000/01/06. 10.1023/a:1008942828960 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hall ME, Smith G, Hall JE, Stec DE. Systolic dysfunction in cardiac-specific ligand-inducible MerCreMer transgenic mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301(1):H253–60. Epub 2011/05/04. 10.1152/ajpheart.00786.2010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alva JA, Zovein AC, Monvoisin A, Murphy T, Salazar A, Harvey NL, et al. VE-Cadherin-Cre-recombinase transgenic mouse: a tool for lineage analysis and gene deletion in endothelial cells. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(3):759–67. Epub 2006/02/02. 10.1002/dvdy.20643 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Westgate EJ, Cheng Y, Reilly DF, Price TS, Walisser JA, Bradfield CA, et al. Genetic components of the circadian clock regulate thrombogenesis in vivo. Circulation. 2008;117(16):2087–95. Epub 2008/04/17. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.739227 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eckle T, Grenz A, Kohler D, Redel A, Falk M, Rolauffs B, et al. Systematic evaluation of a novel model for cardiac ischemic preconditioning in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291(5):H2533–40. 10.1152/ajpheart.00472.2006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Eckle T, Koeppen M, Eltzschig H. Use of a hanging weight system for coronary artery occlusion in mice. J Vis Exp. 2011;(50). 10.3791/2526 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Eckle T, Krahn T, Grenz A, Kohler D, Mittelbronn M, Ledent C, et al. Cardioprotection by ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) and A2B adenosine receptors. Circulation. 2007;115(12):1581–90. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.669697 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eckle T, Kohler D, Lehmann R, El Kasmi K, Eltzschig HK. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is central to cardioprotection: a new paradigm for ischemic preconditioning. Circulation. 2008;118(2):166–75. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.758516 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kohler D, Eckle T, Faigle M, Grenz A, Mittelbronn M, Laucher S, et al. CD39/ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 provides myocardial protection during cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circulation. 2007;116(16):1784–94. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690180 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vasile VC, Babuin L, Giannitsis E, Katus HA, Jaffe AS. Relationship of MRI-determined infarct size and cTnI measurements in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 2008;54(3):617–9. Epub 2008/03/04. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.095604 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yorguner Kupeli N, Bulut NS, Carkaxhiu Bulut G, Kurt E, Kora K. Efficacy of bright light therapy in bipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 2017;260:432–8. Epub 2017/12/22. 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oyama Y, S S; Maddry J, Schauer S; Bebarta V; Eckle T. Intense light pretreatment improves hemodynamics, barrier function and inflammation in a murine model of hemorrhagic shock lung. Mil Med. 2020;in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Powell K. New platform for cataloging hundreds of proteins gets test drive. Nat Med. 2014;20(10):1082–3. 10.1038/nm1014-1082 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Loffredo FS, Steinhauser ML, Jay SM, Gannon J, Pancoast JR, Yalamanchi P, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 is a circulating factor that reverses age-related cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 2013;153(4):828–39. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.015 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bagge A, Schött U, Kander T. High-dose omega-3 fatty acids have no effect on platelet aggregation or coagulation measured with static and flow-based aggregation instruments and Sonoclot; an observational study in healthy volunteers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018;78(7–8):539–45. 10.1080/00365513.2018.1516477 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Budkowska M, Lebiecka A, Marcinowska Z, Wozniak J, Jastrzebska M, Dolegowska B. The circadian rhythm of selected parameters of the hemostasis system in healthy people. Thromb Res. 2019;182:79–88. Epub 2019/09/02. 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.08.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takada A, Saito K, Ro A, Kobayashi M, Hamamatsu A, Murai T, et al. Acute coronary syndrome as a cause of sudden death in patients with old myocardial infarction: a pathological analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003;5 Suppl 1:S292–4. Epub 2003/08/26. 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00153-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tracey CJ, Pan X, Catterson JH, Harmar AJ, Hussain MM, Hartley PS. Diurnal expression of the thrombopoietin gene is regulated by CLOCK. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(4):662–9. Epub 2012/01/31. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04643.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Somanath PR, Podrez EA, Chen J, Ma Y, Marchant K, Antoch M, et al. Deficiency in core circadian protein Bmal1 is associated with a prothrombotic and vascular phenotype. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(1):132–40. Epub 2010/07/27. 10.1002/jcp.22314 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lindsey ML, Bolli R, Canty JM Jr., Du XJ, Frangogiannis NG, Frantz S, et al. Guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;314(4):H812–h38. Epub 2018/01/20. 10.1152/ajpheart.00335.2017 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hartley PS, Sheward J, Scholefield E, French K, Horn JM, Holmes MC, et al. Timed feeding of mice modulates light-entrained circadian rhythms of reticulated platelet abundance and plasma thrombopoietin and affects gene expression in megakaryocytes. Br J Haematol. 2009;146(2):185–92. Epub 2009/05/15. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07722.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reiter R, Swingen C, Moore L, Henry TD, Traverse JH. Circadian dependence of infarct size and left ventricular function after ST elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2012;110(1):105–10. Epub 2011/11/19. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.254284 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kronfeld-Schor N, Bloch G, Schwartz WJ. Animal clocks: when science meets nature. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280(1765):20131354 Epub 2013/07/05. 10.1098/rspb.2013.1354 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Braunwald E. On circadian variation of myocardial reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2012;110(1):6–7. Epub 2012/01/10. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.260265 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kobayashi M, Morinibu A, Koyasu S, Goto Y, Hiraoka M, Harada H. A circadian clock gene, PER2, activates HIF-1 as an effector molecule for recruitment of HIF-1alpha to promoter regions of its downstream genes. The FEBS journal. 2017;284(22):3804–16. Epub 2017/10/01. 10.1111/febs.14280 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:39–56. Epub 2013/08/31. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170322 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu Y, Tang D, Liu N, Xiong W, Huang H, Li Y, et al. Reciprocal Regulation between the Circadian Clock and Hypoxia Signaling at the Genome Level in Mammals. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1):73–85. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Candia J, Cheung F, Kotliarov Y, Fantoni G, Sellers B, Griesman T, et al. Assessment of Variability in the SOMAscan Assay. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14248 Epub 2017/10/29. 10.1038/s41598-017-14755-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Paul A Bartell

4 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-20729

Intense light as anticoagulant therapy in humans

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Eckle,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

In particular, it is important that you note the sample sizes used for all experiments and how the small sample sizes for humans may limit your findings. Additionally, it would be important for you to comment on the particular phasing of the normal cardiovascular cycles for the diurnal humans and nocturnal mice, as has been denoted in the reviews. Similarly, you should also denote the limitations of only having samples from one phase of the circadian cycle.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 19 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Paul A. Bartell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The first part of the Abstract (and Introduction) needs clarification. Why are statements made in the first two sentences regarded as representing “conflicting data”? On the one hand, mice lacking PER2 have deficient platelet function (which can be expected since the circadian clock is impaired). On the other hand, intense light induction of PER2 protected from myocardial IR-injury (which can also be expected since the circadian system is boosted). In what way are these results contradictory?

2. All experiments in mice were carried out at ZT8, or 8 hours after light onset on an L14:D10 schedule.

a. Why was an L14D10 schedule chosen rather than L10D14 since mice are nocturnally active? ZT8 would roughly correspond to mid-rest.

b. Under Results, it is explained that ZT8 was chosen because thrombotic vascular occlusion is slowed down in mice at that time. It would help to also have some additional information for the choice of both ZT8 and L14D10 in the Methods section.

c. One question related to this choice, however, is that in humans, the incidence of myocardial infarctions peaks during the first few hours after awakening, not in the middle of the night. Addressing this issue in the Discussion may be helpful.

3. All variables investigated in this study are circadian periodic. Testing at a single circadian stage (in both mice and humans) is likely to have yielded only partial information. Repeating the measurements at different circadian stages would have been ideal. Mentioning this limitation in the Discussion is recommended.

4. Humans were exposed to light in the morning. Blood sampling was also done in the morning.

a. Would similar results be obtained should blood be sampled later in the day or during the night? Not all myocardial infarctions occur in the morning.

b. Adding information why exposure to light is preferred in the morning would be helpful (light at night is associated with circadian disruption and is usually seen as being harmful).

Reviewer #2: This article is very interesting and significant. In my opinion the study was planned very well.

I have some doubts about:

- small numer of human volunteers – too small?

- number of mice used in experiments - there is no information?

- tests which were used to perform a statistical analysis - a small number of healthy human volunteers

This requires some explanation.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: GERMAINE CORNELISSEN

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244792.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Nov 2020

Point by point response

Editor

1. It is important that you note the sample sizes used for all experiments and how the small sample sizes for humans may limit your findings.

Thank you so much for pointing this out. We agree that the small sample size for humans limits our findings. We have added this limitation to the discussion. All n numbers are added to the figure legends.

‘Further limitations of our work are small sample sizes, only using one time point for mice or human studies and not evaluating clotting events in humans in the evening following intense light exposure in the morning’

‘Besides, low sample size and test limitations (selection of 1319 proteins) of our proteomics platform might make our conclusions on light having an impact on humans appear premature.’

2. It would be important for you to comment on the particular phasing of the normal cardiovascular cycles for the diurnal humans and nocturnal mice, as has been denoted in the reviews.

We agree that this is an important point. Thus, we have expanded on this in more detail in the discussion. In fact, we and others have found similar timing of events in humans and mice. As such humans have larger infarcts and troponin levels in the morning hours and we have shown in several studies that this is true for mice as well (e.g. Nature Medicine 2012, Cell Reports 2019). In fact, very fundamental features of the circadian system are the same in apparently diurnal and nocturnal animals, including the molecular oscillatory machinery and the mechanisms responsible for pacemaker entrainment by light. As such, circadian rhythms function independently of a diurnal or nocturnal behavior due to multiple yet parallel outputs from the SCN (suprachiasmatic nuclei).

‘While mice are nocturnal and humans are diurnal, our group has shown that myocardial ischemia leads to bigger infarct sizes and plasma troponin values in the early morning hours like studies in humans [46]. In fact, circadian rhythms function independently of a diurnal or nocturnal behavior due to multiple yet parallel outputs from the SCN [47]. As such, very basic features of the circadian system are the same in apparently diurnal and nocturnal animals, including the molecular oscillatory machinery and the mechanisms responsible for pacemaker entrainment by light [47]. Further, we have shown that PER2 levels reciprocally correlate with infarct sizes and troponin levels in mice and men [14, 18]. These findings highlight that activity levels do not affect the diurnal pattern of myocardial ischemia events, as proposed by some authors that the increased morning incidence of myocardial ischemia in humans is purely stress related [48]. Also, PER2 is hypoxia-regulated in mice and humans, which supports similar biological roles in both species [14]. Further, important hypoxia adaptive mechanism such as hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1A) regulation and function are PER2 dependent [49] and also seem to be independent of a nocturnal nature [50], despite HIF1A expression being under circadian control [51]. Indeed, human and mouse studies on HIF1A find similar responses to cardiovascular ischemic events [50].’

3. You should also denote the limitations of only having samples from one phase of the circadian cycle.

Thank you for pointing this out. We agree that using only one phase limits our data and we added this to the discussion section.

‘Further limitations of our work are small sample sizes, only using one time point for mice or human studies and not evaluating clotting events in humans in the evening following intense light exposure in the morning.’

Reviewer #1

1. The first part of the Abstract (and Introduction) needs clarification. Why are statements made in the first two sentences regarded as representing “conflicting data”? On the one hand, mice lacking PER2 have deficient platelet function (which can be expected since the circadian clock is impaired). On the other hand, intense light induction of PER2 protected from myocardial IR-injury (which can also be expected since the circadian system is boosted). In what way are these results contradictory?

Thank you so much for this excellent point. We apologize for not being clearer. The conflicting results are that PER2 KO mice clot less than wildtype mice. As less clotting would be associated with a benefit during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury, those findings conflict with findings showing larger infarct sizes following myocardial ischemia in PER2KO mice. We have clarified this in the abstract and the introduction.

‘Blood coagulation is central to myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury. Studies on the light elicited circadian rhythm protein Period 2 (PER2) using whole body Per2-/- mice found deficient platelet function and reduced clotting which would be expected to protect from myocardial IR-injury. In contrast, intense light induction of PER2 protected from myocardial IR-injury while Per2 deficiency was detrimental. Based on these conflicting data, we sought to evaluate the role of platelet specific PER2 in coagulation and myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury.’

‘As compromised platelet aggregation reduces myocardial IR-injury [22], these findings stand in contrast to recent findings on PER2 as an endogenous protective mechanism during myocardial ischemia [18].’

2. All experiments in mice were carried out at ZT8, or 8 hours after light onset on an L14:D10 schedule.

a. Why was an L14D10 schedule chosen rather than L10D14 since mice are nocturnally active? ZT8 would roughly correspond to mid-rest.

Thank you so much for pointing this out. The reason for this time schedule was that all our studies in mice have been conducted using a L10D14 light cycle. To be able to compare the new data with our own findings we felt it was critical to keep this light cycle. In addition, 14-hour light/10-hour dark cycle is a commonly used light cycle in animal facilities and recommended by Jackson laboratories to reduce mouse stress.

b. Under Results, it is explained that ZT8 was chosen because thrombotic vascular occlusion is slowed down in mice at that time. It would help to also have some additional information for the choice of both ZT8 and L14D10 in the Methods section.

Thank you so much for this excellent point. We have further expanded on his in the method section.

‘To be able to compare new data with previous findings a LD14:10 light cycle was chosen which is the standard housing condition at the University of Colorado. Moreover, a LD14:10 cycle is commonly used and recommend by Jackson Laboratories to reduce mouse stress.’

‘As studies have shown that thrombotic vascular occlusion in mice is circadian controlled and significantly slowed down at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 8 [28], we chose this time point for our all studies on murine platelet aggregation.’

c. One question related to this choice, however, is that in humans, the incidence of myocardial infarctions peaks during the first few hours after awakening, not in the middle of the night. Addressing this issue in the Discussion may be helpful.

Thank you for this excellent point. Our data have shown that MIs and troponin values peak in the early morning hours in mice and men and correlate with PER2 levels. We have expanded on this in the discussion.

‘While mice are nocturnal and humans are diurnal, our group has shown that myocardial ischemia leads to bigger infarct sizes and plasma troponin values in the early morning hours like studies in humans [46]. In fact, circadian rhythms function independently of a diurnal or nocturnal behavior due to multiple yet parallel outputs from the SCN [47]. As such, very basic features of the circadian system are the same in apparently diurnal and nocturnal animals, including the molecular oscillatory machinery and the mechanisms responsible for pacemaker entrainment by light [47]. Further, we have shown that PER2 levels reciprocally correlate with infarct sizes and troponin levels in mice and men [14, 18]. These findings highlight that activity levels do not affect the diurnal pattern of myocardial ischemia events, as proposed by some authors that the increased morning incidence of myocardial ischemia in humans is purely stress related [48]. Also, PER2 is hypoxia-regulated in mice and humans, which supports similar mechanisms in both species [14]. Further, important hypoxia adaptive mechanism such as hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF1A) regulation and function are PER2 dependent [49] and also seem to be independent of a nocturnal nature [50], despite HIF1A expression being under circadian control [51]. Indeed, human and mouse studies on HIF1A find similar responses to cardiovascular ischemic events [50].’

3. All variables investigated in this study are circadian periodic. Testing at a single circadian stage (in both mice and humans) is likely to have yielded only partial information. Repeating the measurements at different circadian stages would have been ideal. Mentioning this limitation in the Discussion is recommended.

We fully agree and added this as limitation to the discussion section.

‘Further limitations of our work are small sample sizes, only using one time point for mice or human studies and not evaluating clotting events in humans in the evening following intense light exposure in the morning.’

4. Humans were exposed to light in the morning. Blood sampling was also done in the morning.

a. Would similar results be obtained should blood be sampled later in the day or during the night? Not all myocardial infarctions occur in the morning.

This is an excellent point. We don’t know the answer to this as we are at the beginning to understand how light therapy can affect important physiological processes. Since our data are so new, we felt that it would be important to share the data with the research community. Regarding light exposure and PER2 levels in humans, we have published that the short light exposure increases PER2 in humans in the morning and in the evening (way after any light exposure). So, we could speculate that this would also be the case for the anticoagulatory effects. However, these clearly needs further evaluation.

b. Adding information why exposure to light is preferred in the morning would be helpful (light at night is associated with circadian disruption and is usually seen as being harmful).

Yes, this is an excellent point and have added this to the method section.

‘Based on strategies using intense light therapy [10,000 LUX] to treat seasonal mood disorders in humans [35], we adopted a similar protocol. Timing of light therapy has been shown to be critical as light therapy e.g. if given at night can cause insomnia and hyperactivity and therefore the morning hours are recommended.’

Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2: This article is very interesting and significant. In my opinion the study was planned very well.

Thank you so much.

I have some doubts about small number of human volunteers – too small?

Thank you so much for pointing this out. The human volunteer number for the protein array is clearly limited. This is mainly due to the cost of the array. However, 12 samples from 4 volunteers were enough to reach statistical significance in a large amount of proteins. In addition, an n of 3 per timepoint/condition for arrays is not unusual. Since we have 12 arrays and a time kinetic, we think our data are in fact quite strong.

For the clotting studies in human volunteers we had in fact an n of 6 individuals for each time point which also resulted in statically significant data points.

- number of mice used in experiments - there is no information.

The n numbers are all mentioned in the figure legends in bold. We have used an n of 4 to 6 which has been sufficient to reach statistical significance based in a large experience from in prior studies.

- tests which were used to perform a statistical analysis - a small number of healthy human volunteers

2 group analysis, which were most of the experiments, were analyzed using a t test. The protein array data were analyzed via linear regression with false discovery rate correction of the p values using the Benjamini and Hochberg method to control for multiple comparisons.

Decision Letter 1

Paul A Bartell

17 Dec 2020

Intense light as anticoagulant therapy in humans

PONE-D-20-20729R1

Dear Dr. Eckle,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Paul A. Bartell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Paul A Bartell

21 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-20729R1

Intense light as anticoagulant therapy in humans

Dear Dr. Eckle:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Paul A. Bartell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Myocardial ischemia in mice with a tissue specific deletion in endothelia, myocytes or bone marrow.

    Serum troponin-I from Per2loxP/loxP-VE Cadherin Cre (endothelial specific), Per2loxP/loxP-Myosin Cre (cardiomyocyte sepcfic), Per2loxP/loxP-Lyz2 Cre (bone marrow specific) after 60 min of in situ myocardial ischemia and 2h reperfusion (mean±SD; n = 5).

    (PDF)

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are uploaded to figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13424414.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES