Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2020 Dec 31;7(Suppl 1):S369–S370. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.811

617. Physician Perspective: Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) in the ID Workforce

Alison M Beieler 1, Alison M Beieler 1, Leah H Yoke 2, Leah H Yoke 2, Catherine Liu 3, Steven A Pergam 3, Anna Wald 4, Anna Wald 4, Shireesha Dhanireddy 4, Shireesha Dhanireddy 4
PMCID: PMC7776608

Abstract

Background

Applicants entering Infectious Disease (ID) fellowships are declining and shortages of ID physicians is a challenge recognized by the clinical workforce and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). There is increased awareness of more Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) being used within ID to expand and extend existing practices. However, little is known about APP utilization, APP clinical scope of practice, specific roles, and opportunities for education.

Methods

To evaluate physician perspectives on APP utilization in ID, we created an anonymous and voluntary survey using the REDCap data tool that was distributed by social media, key stakeholder emails, and IDSA online community forum between 12/1/2019-1/31/2020. In addition to collecting geographic information and the type of ID practice, participants were also surveyed about the use of APPs and any perceived barriers that may limit their use.

Results

218 practicing ID physicians responded to the survey (Figure 1). 155 (71%) physicians work with APPs in their current practice (Figure 2); specifically, 56 (27%) with 1 APP, 62 (30%) with 2-4 APPs, 28 (13%) with 5-9 APPs, and 11 (5%) with > 10 APPs. Of respondents, 104 (48%) practiced at University/Medical schools, 80 (37%) in hospitals/clinics, and 28 (13%) in private practice (Table 1); most work in adult inpatient/outpatient ID. The main reasons selected by respondents for not using APPs in their practice included concerns around a lack of formal ID training 22 (15%), lack of time/lack of ability to assist with APP training 29 (20%), practice is already sufficiently staffed 19 (13%), and concern for physician revenue loss 16 (11%) (Table 1).

Figure 1. Physician Responses by Region, n = 218

graphic file with name 1-f943.jpg

Figure 2. Physicians Utilizing APPs in Practice, n = 210 (*no response, 8)

graphic file with name 1-f944.jpg

Table 1. Physician ID Practice Type, Setting, and Concerns

graphic file with name 1-f945.jpg

Conclusion

Results suggest that while collaboration between ID physicians and APPs exists to meet current needs, a lack of ID training is a limiting factor. Our findings demonstrate there is an opportunity for formal ID education and resource development both to enhance APPs clinical skills and address perceived knowledge gaps. Inclusion of APPs in the ID workforce may allow physicians to expand ID care into more resource limited areas to continue to provide high quality patient care.

Disclosures

Steven A. Pergam, MD, MPH, Chimerix, Inc (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Global Life Technologies, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi-Aventis (Other Financial or Material Support, Participate in clinical trial sponsored by NIAID (U01-AI132004); vaccines for this trial are provided by Sanofi-Aventis)


Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES