Abstract
Today, the increasing rate of cancer-related mortality, has rendered cancer a major global challenge, and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Conventional approaches in the treatment of cancer mainly include chemotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, these approaches still come with certain disadvantages, including drug resistance, and different side effects such as gastrointestinal (GI) irritation (e.g., diarrhea, mucositis). This has encouraged scientists to look for alternative therapeutic methods and adjuvant therapies for a more proper treatment of malignancies. Application of probiotics as an adjuvant therapy in the clinical management of cancer appears to be a promising strategy, with several notable advantages, e.g., increased safety, higher tolerance, and negligible GI side effects. Both in vivo and in vitro analyses have indicated the active role of yeast probiotics in mitigating the rate of cancer cell proliferation, and the induction of apoptosis through regulating the expression of cancer-related genes and cellular pathways. Strain-specific anti-cancer activities of yeast probiotics strongly suggest that their administration along with the current cancer therapies may be an efficient method to reduce the side effects of these approaches. The main purpose of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of yeast probiotics in alleviating the adverse effects associated with cancer therapies.
Keywords: Adjuvant therapy, Apoptosis, Bioactive components, Cancer therapy, Probiotic, Yeast
Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines probiotics as “living microorganisms which confer beneficial health effects to the host when administered in adequate amounts” [1]. The currently recognized probiotics are mainly categorized into the lactic acid bacteria and yeast groups. Along with various strains of bacteria [2], a big number of yeast species, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii, Kluyveromyces, Debaryomyces, Candida, Pichia, Hanseniaspora, and Metschnikowia have been shown to possess probiotic properties [3]. The primary salutary effects of yeast probiotics, such as their potential for prevention and treatment of intestinal disorders, along with their immunomodulatory properties, have been reviewed in several studies [4]. Likewise, the anti-cancer properties of yeast probiotics have been extensively investigated by different methods in various studies, including cell-based studies, animal models, and clinical trials. Table 1 summarizes the recent application of probiotics and their strain-specific effects mediated through different mechanisms. In this review, we aim to provide a brief account of the beneficial effects of yeast probiotics, with the emphasis on their anti-cancer properties, particularly in the prevention of Colorectal Cancer (CRC).
Table 1.
Effect | Probiotic strains | Mechanisms of actions |
---|---|---|
Immunomodulation | Lactobacillus | Induce TNF-α secretion by lipoteichoic acid (LTA) [5] |
Bifidobacterium longum | Modulate TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12 and TH17 responses [6] due to its surface exopolysaccharide | |
B. animalislactis Bb-12 | Activated intestinal NF-κB [7] | |
IgA secretion [8] | ||
Improving the immune system and cytokine production in COVID-19 patients | Lactobacillus | As adjuvant nutritional therapies in COVID-19 patients [9–11] |
Protective effects against physiological stress | L. acidophilus (strain LAP5 and LF33) | Bind to the intestinal epithelial cells and blocked the colonization of Salmonella [12] |
L. acidophilus A4 | Antagonize adhesion of the E. coli adhesion to epithelial cells by up-regulation of mucin-2, IL-8, IL-1β and TNF-α [13] | |
Bifidobacterium spp. | Produce acetate and inhibit Shiga toxin–producing E. coli O157:H7 [14] | |
Lactobacilus and Enterococcus | Produce bacteriocins [15, 16] | |
L. salivarius UCC118 | Protect infected mice with L. monocytogenes [17] | |
L. acidophilus La-5 1 | Inhibited autoinducer-2 (AI-2) and decreased the virulence factors expression of E. coli O157:H7 [18] | |
L. acidophilus GP1B | Prevented AI-2 activity of Clostridioides difficile [19] | |
L. reuteri RC-14 | Production of mediators against Staphylococcus aureus QS, blocked its virulence, and expression of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 [20] | |
Suppression of pathogens | L. plantarum | Reduce hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid via regulation of TNF receptor 2 expression and MEK/ERK pathway [21] |
Modulation of gut microbiome and Intestinal Barrier Function | L. fermentum and L. plantarum | In context to Obesity [22, 23], Produce Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) and Acetic acid, improve tight junction proteins, regulating the immune response, and stimulating host defense peptides [24] |
Other mechanisms | Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium | Reduction weight gain, decrease the levels of plasma cholesterol and liver triglycerides [25, 26], bile acids deconjugation [27], impaired glucose tolerance [28] |
L. rhamnosus JB-1 | Modified the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A expression and GABA-B receptors in the brain related to stress and anxiety-related responses [29] | |
L. reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 | Showed an anti-nociceptive effect via transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 -dependent manner [30] | |
L. acidophilus NCFM | Induced expression of μ-opioid and cannabinoid receptors in the gut epithelial cells and presented analgesic impact [31] |
General overview of yeast probiotics
To date, several successful attempts have been made at the isolation and characterization of bacterial probiotics (primarily lactobacillus) from different sources, including traditional dairy products, plants, and human biological samples [2, 32–35]. Regardless of the bacterial source of most probiotics, the therapeutic potential of non-pathogenic yeasts probiotics warrants prospective clinical trials in this field. An important advantage of yeast probiotics is that they are highly resistant against gastrointestinal enzymes, bile salts, pH variations, organic acids, and variations in temperature. For instance, Saccharomyces is a non-bacterial prototype harboring the same beneficial properties as the bacterial probiotics. In comparison with bacterial probiotics, the size of yeast cells is 10 times larger, with an optimal growth pH and temperature of 4.5–6.5 and 37 °C, respectively. The majority of yeast strains are able to grow at a pH equal to 3.0, however, some species can tolerate an even lower pH (<1.5).
Compared to bacterial probiotics, yeasts possess intrinsic resistance to antibiotics. Non-genetic transferring of antibiotic-resistance genes between bacteria and yeasts may render these probiotics more effective for patients who use antibiotics. Besides, the modification of the immune response is considered an important mechanism to explain the positive effects of yeast probiotics. The structure of yeast cell wall and the secretory bioactive compounds such as β-glucan, mannoproteins, chitin, and nucleic acids are responsible for the immunostimulatory effects of these organisms [36]. The majority of reported investigations on yeast probiotics in clinical and animal studies have been carried out on Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, the probiotic effects of Candida strains, Hanseniaspora opuntia, Hortaea werneckii, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Debaryomyces strains have also been documented [37–39]. S. cerevisiae and S. boulardii are mostly adopted in probiotic adjuvant therapies to treat antibiotic-associated diarrhea and bacterial infections, improve the intestinal mucosa, modulate mucosal immune responses, and induce the expression of a heterologous protein with several therapeutic properties [40–42].
S. boulardii is most active in the colon, and it can survive the preceding portion of the GI tract until it reaches the colon [43]. Hence, this yeast probiotic would be suitable for human consumption for the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disorders (IBD), and any type of gastroenteritis [42, 44, 45]. The optimal growth temperature for Saccharomyces strains ranges from 22 °C to 30 °C. However, inside the human body, S. boulardii is able to survive at up to 37 °C. Owing to its intrinsic resistance to the gastric acid and intestinal bile, S. boulardii is highly likely to survive the effects of antibiotics and proteolysis in the intestinal tract, ultimately improving intestinal inflammations. In an study led by Sougioultzis et al., human HT-29 colonocytes and THP-1 monocytes were immunologically induced with IL-1β, TNF-α or LPS combined with the supernatant of S. boulardii. The study reported that S. boulardii hindered the production of IL-8 in HT-29 cells by inducing IL-1β or TNF-α. Moreover, S. boulardii was also able to inhibit the production of IL-8, prevent the degradation of IB-α, and counteract the upregulation of NF-kB-DNA through binding to NF-kB reporter gene. The anti-inflammatory effects of this yeast were shown to result in deactivation of NF-kB, and down-regulation of IL-8 in intestinal epithelial cells and monocytes. These findings suggest S. boulardii as a potential therapeutic candidate to be used either for the treatment of infectious and non-infectious human intestinal diseases [46].
Kluyveromyces lactis is another yeast probiotic with unique features such as resistance to gastrointestinal digestion, β-galactosidase activity, and a high potential for adhesion, prevention of enteric pathogens, and production of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) [42, 47]. Several beneficial effects of K. marxianus strain B0399 have also been investigated, which includes adhesion, metabolic activity, and immunomodulation of gut microbiota. Accordingly, the adhesion of K. marxianus to the Caco-2 cells can ameliorate the inflammatory response by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines, and also improve colonic microbiota by increasing the population of bifidobacteria, and the production of SCFAs (acetate and propionate) [48]. In another investigation, K. marxianus S-2-05 and K. lactis S-3-05 were isolated from traditional cheese and their activity against Salmonella was evaluated in a GI model. Reportedly, these yeasts were able to survive in the GI environment and form a biofilm on polystyrene surfaces, suggesting their potential for adhesion to Caco-2 cells and probiotic properties [49]. An investigation on the anti-inflammatory effects of K. marxianus CIDCA 8154 in IBD concluded that pretreatment of cells with K. marxianus might decrease the levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species and IL-6. Moreover, cellular oxidative stress was reported to be modulated by the activation of the SKN-1 transcription factor via the DAF-2 pathway in nematode models [50].
Debaryomyces hansenii is another yeast probiotic strain with immunostimulatory effects on goat leukocytes through β-glucans. D. hansenii CBS 8339 can survive in bile salts and the acidic pH of the GI tract, and adhere to the intestinal mucosa. The analysis of immunological and antioxidant properties of this strain confirmed the positive effects of D. hansenii on the viability of leukocytes in animal models. On the other hand, a yeast-supplemented diet resulted in the upregulation of TLR receptor genes, modulator genes (such as Raf.1, Syk, and Myd88, AP-1), and cytokine levels (IL-1β and TNF-α). These findings demonstrated that the oral administration of D. hansenii CBS 8339 stimulated immune response, antioxidant agents, and immune-associated signaling pathways genes in a short time [51]. Moreover, the effects of D. hansenii in combination with Qi-Wei-Bai-Zhu powder were investigated on the gut microbiota of mice with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The microbial content was evaluated by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene to demonstrate the species-wise diversity. The results indicated a high frequency of Bacteroidales S24–7 and Bifidobacterium, suppression of Oscillospira and Ruminococcus, and proliferation of Erysipelotrichaceae and Blautia in the murine models of diarrhea [52]. The main functions of gut microbiota including digestion, metabolism, and modulation of immune reactions depend on its diversity [53]. As mentioned earlier, treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea with D. hansenii, as a part of the intragastric flora, improved the operational taxonomic units of intestinal bacteria and recovered the beneficial bacteria, such as Bacteroidaceae [54]. Follow-up analyses confirmed the potential of D. hansenii in the maintenance of the normal microbiome ecology, development of lactase-producing bacteria, and inhibition of opportunistic pathogens [55, 56, 39]. The results obtained from animal studies warrant prospective therapeutic clinical applications of yeast probiotics, with an emphasis on management of diarrhea.
The role of yeast probiotics in the management of cancer
According to the WHO reports, cancer is a global health problem with ~9.6 million deaths in 2018 [57]. The most prevalent cancers include lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, skin, and stomach cancer. Yeast probiotics may have important effects on the molecular and cellular pathways, that could be useful in the prevention and treatment of cancers [58]. The basic mechanisms of signal transmission and sensitization underlying the negative regulatory effects of yeasts on cancer cells include modification of microbiota, degradation of carcinogenic substances in the intestinal lumen, production of anti-carcinogenic components like SCFAs, and conjugation of SCFAs to linoleic acid. Modulation of immune responses, improvement of intestinal barriers, inhibition of cell proliferation, and induction of apoptosis are other mechanisms through which yeast probiotics regulate the growth of cancer cells [59].
Cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer-related mortality with an annual number of 862,000 deaths. Today, there is a rising debate regarding the efficacy of conventional cancer treatment methods. CRC is a multistage malignancy with various risk factors including genetic factors, familial background, age, gender, nutrition, smoking, and limited physical activity. In search of novel therapeutics, the clinical application of safe yeast probiotics is speculated to yield promising results [60, 61]. Probiotics could provide a non-expensive and non-invasive adjuvant therapy for the treatment of CRC by modulating the genes and signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of CRC. In addition, using probiotic yeasts in the treatment of CRC could reduce the side effects of current cancer therapies. The administration of probiotics to CRC patients could enhance the gut flora, produce antimicrobials materials and anti-carcinogenic agents, remove 32–3 carcinogens, provide intestinal permeability, and improve the function of tight junctions and enzyme activity in CRC patients. However, not all of the probiotic strains possess anti-CRC properties. Hence, further studies are required to identify potent probiotics, as probiotic-based therapeutic agents, to prevent and treat CRC [62].
Shamekhi et al. reviewed the promising biotherapeutic effects of yeast probiotics in the prevention and treatment of CRC [63]. In terms of cancer therapy, S. boulardii and S. cerevisiae improve enterocyte tight junctions, modulate host cell signaling, inhibit the activity of ERK1/2 and EGFR signaling, and inactivate tyrosine kinase receptors [64, 65] (Table 2). The β-Glucan of S. cerevisiae was reported to stimulate the mammalian immune system, suggesting potential therapeutic implications in the treatment of infectious diseases and cancer [66]. The immunomodulatory effects associated with yeast probiotics mostly involve receptors like Dectin-1, Complement Receptor 3 (CR3) and TLR-2/6. In addition, the immune systems can be modulated by triggering immune cells including macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, Natural Killer Cells (NKCs), Dendritic cells (DCs), and increasing the opsonic and non-opsonic phagocytosis.
Table 2.
Yeast probiotic/components | Model of study | Anti-cancer effects | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
Heat-killed S. cerevisiae | Breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and ZR-75-1) and non-metastatic breast cancer cells (HCC70) |
Induction of apoptosis Mitochondrial membrane Disruption Activation of caspases (8, 9 and 3) |
[70] |
Squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue (SCC-4 and SCC-9) and adenocarcinomas of the colon (Caco-2 and DLD-1) | Induction of apoptosis | [71] | |
SW480 | Lower the of expression of p-Akt1, Rel A, Bcl-XL, pro-caspase 3, and pro-9, and could rise the BAX, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-9 expression | [72] | |
HeLa | Induction of apoptosis: cell enlargement, membrane bleb, and chromatin condensation | [73] | |
Mice model of Solid Ehrlich Carcinoma tumor (SEC) |
Cause tumor degeneration, apoptosis, and ischemic (coagulative) and liquefactive necrosis Recruitment the leukocytes, macrophages into the tumors Higher the TNF-α and IFN-gamma plasma and lowered the IL-10 levels |
[74] | |
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cells | Cells phagocytized yeast and underwent apoptosis due to elevation of intracellular Ca2+, decreasedBcl-2 expression and increase in Bax expression | [75] | |
Supernatant of S. cerevisiae | HT-29 colon cancer cell line |
Higher the PTEN and Caspas3 expression Lower the Bclxl and RelA genes expression Induce apoptosis and reduce the metastasis |
[76] |
Ergosterol | MCF-7 cells | Produce the oxidation form of ergosterol and inhibit the cancer cells growing | [77] |
β-glucan of S. cerevisiae | CHO-k1 and CHO-xrs5 cell lines | Prevent DNA damage | [78] |
Patients with advanced breast cancer | Induced the proliferation and activation of peripheral blood monocytes | [79] | |
Lung metastasis of colon 26-M3.1 carcinoma or B16-BL6 melanoma cells | Macrophages were induced by IS-2 and produced cytokines (IL-1β, IFN-γ, and IL-12). | [80] | |
Mice feeding with the insoluble β-glucan (1 week), murine hepatoma MH-22a cells | Increase the count of neutrophil blood and reduce the lymphocyte count | [81] | |
S180 tumor-bearing mice |
Decrease the weight and tumor volume Decrease the CD4–CD8 ratio Increase the IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α levels Up-regulate the Bax expression Down-regulate the Bcl-2 expression |
[82] | |
Saccharomyces boulardii | ApcMin mice orally received the yeast | Inhibits EGFR and other receptor tyrosine kinase signaling | [83] |
Carboxymethyl-glucan: soluble derivative of β-glucan | Advanced prostate cancer patients |
Higher the total leukocyte count, red blood cell, hematocrit, hemoglobin and platelet counts. Could be an adjuvant to cancer treatment |
[84] |
Cytoplasmic extract and cell wall of S. cerevisiae and S. boulardi | Cell line K562 | Cell apoptosis and necrosis | [85] |
Selenium-enriched S. cerevisiae | Rats model of CRC | Reduce CRC progression by decrease the number / size of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) and alteration the function of P53, BCL2, and CD31 | [86] |
Mucositis mice induced by 5FU | Selenium-enriched yeast reduced eosinophil peroxidase activity | [87] | |
S. boulardii: Insoluble glucan, cell wall polysaccharides | Male F344 rat CRC model |
↓ACF: prevention biomarkers Reduction of quinone reductase activity |
[60] |
HT-29 cell lines | antiradical and anti-proliferative effect | [60] | |
Herbal medicine and S. cerevisiae | Hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells HepG2 cells- bearing nude mice model |
Anti-proliferation effect Inhibit tumor growth |
[88] |
Paclitaxel in the presence or absence of S. cerevisiae |
Metastatic murine 4 T1 line Murine Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) line Human breast cancer MCF-7 line |
Decreased 4 T1 cell viability, triggered DNA damage, induced the apoptosis, and inhibit cell proliferation Chemosensitizing effect of yeast along with paclitaxel increased Be as novel adjuvant for chemotherapy treatment |
[89] |
An investigation revealed that upon oral administration, animals were not able to digest a specific chain of β-glucans (backbone 1 → 3 linear β-glycosidic). As a result, the excessive β-glucans are transferred to the proximal small intestine, where a small amount of these molecules are captured by macrophages. After internalization and fragmentation of β-glucans within these cells, macrophages migrate to the bone marrow and endothelial reticular system. Different immune responses are activated when small fragments of β-glucans released by macrophages are taken up by other immune cells. It has been confirmed that different sizes of β-glucans and branching patterns have variable immunogenicity. In this regard, to investigate the effect of β-glucans in clinical studies, a careful selection of probiotics is essential [67]. Further studies have indicated that β-glucans of yeasts can induce secretion of cytokines, and lead to production of IL-12 in DCs. In one study, the production of cytokines was noticeably reduced in Myeloid Differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-deficient macrophages and DCs. These findings indicated that β-glucans could be used in adjuvant therapy of cancer due mostly to their bioavailable moiety, and their modulatory effects on the cytokine secretion through DCs, and phagocytosis of iC3b-opsonised tumor cells by macrophages [68]. Another study conducted on animal cancer models confirmed that a combination of yeast β-glucans with anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies would improve the clinical therapeutic efficacy in tumor regression and long-term survival during cancer treatment [69]. It has been revealed that S. cerevisiae is considerably suppressed in CRC. The beneficial effects of yeasts on Colorectal Adenoma (CRA) were validated by in vivo (C57BL/6 and APCMin/+ mouse models) and in vitro cells assays. Murine models of CRA/CRC were divided into test and control groups, with the former receiving S. cerevisiae, along with antibiotics, for 8 weeks. According to the results, the density of S. cerevisiae in CRA and CRC patients were 2.68-fold and 3.94-fold lower in comparison to the control groups, respectively. In addition, the outcomes of in vivo analysis displayed the potential of S. cerevisiae in mitigating the progression of CRC by inducing apoptosis, modulation of gut microbial profiles, and intestinal immunity. Moreover, S. cerevisiae downregulated NF-κB and rapamycin-mediated signaling pathways (mTOR). The apoptotic effects of yeast probiotics and their ability in modulating the mucosal microbial profile in CRC confirmed the important role of probiotic S. cerevisiae in the treatment of CRC, warranting further investigations [9].
Along with the anti-cancer effects of S. cerevisiae and S. boulardii, the inhibitory role of the exopolysaccharide (EPSs) of K. marxianus and P. kudriavzevii on SW-480 (non-metastatic), HT-29 (low-metastatic), and HCT-116 (highly-metastatic), and human embryonic kidney normal cell line (KDR/293) were investigated. According to the results, EPSs considerably induced apoptosis by up-regulation of pro-apoptotic genes (BAX, Caspase-3, and Caspase-8) and down-regulation of anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2). Furthermore, a depressed expression of inflammation pathway genes (AKT-1, JAK-1, and mTOR) in cancer cells treated with both extracted EPSs was detected with insignificant changes when compared to the normal cell lines.
The ferroptosis signaling pathway was assessed by evaluating the Nrf-2 and CoQ10 genes. The Nrf-2 mRNA levels increased, while the CoQ10 mRNA levels were not significantly upregulated. Therefore, it was assumed that these EPSs of probiotic yeast could be applied as therapeutic agents against CRC-targeted molecules [90]. Kourelis et al. evaluated the in vitro ability of probiotic yeasts isolated from different sources (feta cheese or infantile gastrointestinal tract). All strains displayed in vitro probiotic properties including resistance to acid and bile, adhesion to Caco-2 cells, removal of cholesterol, and immunostimulatory activity. Moreover, it was found that beside the Saccharomyces strains, other yeast species such as K. lactis could also be considered as probiotics. Despite these valuable results, further studies are necessary to elucidate the beneficial effects of yeasts on the GI system after oral administration [91]. Shamloo et al. investigated the role of P. fermentans metabolites on the induction of apoptosis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). Similar to cisplatin, the metabolites of this yeast imposed a cytotoxicity of 85% to the tumor cells, while in the normal cells only a cytotoxicity of 21% was recorded. In addition, the effects of S. cerevisiae was not the same as P. fermentans results, which actually pointed to strain-dependent bioactivity of yeasts. The cytotoxicity mentioned here was shown to be due to the effects of the yeast on the mechanisms involved in apoptosis, mediated mostly through the regulation of BAX and CASP genes [92].
Conclusion
According to the recent studies, S. cerevisiae is a safe microorganism that can be used as a promising therapeutic approach for effective inhibition of tumor cell proliferation. More robust and coherent studies on the effects of probiotics on cancer cell types are required to achieve more reliable results. This can be an important step in the treatment and prevention of cancer. Until now, efficient therapies using yeast probiotics have been confirmed for the treatment of different diseases. However, finding the exact dosage and viability potential of yeast probiotics still remains a significant challenge. This requires further well-designed clinical studies to elucidate the exact benefits of probiotics, identify and demonstrate their criteria and strain-specific properties, and assess their biosafety. Furthermore, increasing the half-life of probiotic products, preservation against the GI secretions, and raising the adherence potential of these microorganisms to the GI epithelium are all essential in this context. Gene technology can help discover novel potential yeast strains. Application of a combination of probiotics may leave a greater positive impact on the efficacy of cancer treatment regimens when compared to a single probiotic. Given the confirmed anti-cancer potentials of probiotics, a wide range of these microorganisms has recently been considered for their immunomodulatory effects and antiviral activity, especially against Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, since COVID-19 is a newly spreading viral infection with a high rate of mortality, more researches are necessary to affirm probiotics as a safe and effective therapy against COVID-19.
Author contributions
All authors equally contributed in the wiring of the manuscript.
Funding
Funding was provided by Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Vieira AT, Teixeira MM, Martins FS. The role of probiotics and prebiotics in inducing gut immunity. Front Immunol. 2013;4:445. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nami Y, Vaseghi Bakhshayesh R, Mohammadzadeh Jalaly H, Lotfi H, Eslami S, Hejazi MA. Probiotic properties of enterococcus isolated from artisanal dairy products. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:300. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith IM, Baker A, Arneborg N, Jespersen L. Non-saccharomyces yeasts protect against epithelial cell barrier disruption induced by Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;61(5):491–497. doi: 10.1111/lam.12481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moslehi-Jenabian S, Lindegaard L, Jespersen L. Beneficial effects of probiotic and food borne yeasts on human health. Nutrients. 2010;2(4):449–473. doi: 10.3390/nu2040449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matsuguchi T, Takagi A, Matsuzaki T, Nagaoka M, Ishikawa K, Yokokura T, Yoshikai Y. Lipoteichoic acids from Lactobacillus strains elicit strong tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducing activities in macrophages through Toll-like receptor 2. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10(2):259–266. doi: 10.1128/cdli.10.2.259-266.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.von Ossowski I, Pietilä TE, Rintahaka J, Nummenmaa E, Mäkinen V-M, Reunanen J, Satokari R, de Vos WM, Palva I, Palva A. Using recombinant Lactococci as an approach to dissect the immunomodulating capacity of surface piliation in probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ardita CS, Mercante JW, Kwon YM, Luo L, Crawford ME, Powell DN, Jones RM, Neish AS. Epithelial adhesion mediated by pilin SpaC is required for Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-induced cellular responses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(16):5068–5077. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01039-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Galdeano CM, Perdigon G. The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei induces activation of the gut mucosal immune system through innate immunity. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006;13(2):219–226. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.2.219-226.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morais AHA, Passos TS, Maciel BLL, da Silva-Maia JK. Can probiotics and diet promote beneficial immune modulation and purine control in coronavirus infection? Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1737. doi: 10.3390/nu12061737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mak JW, Chan FK, Ng SC. Probiotics and COVID-19: one size does not fit all. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(7):644–645. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30122-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Conte L, Toraldo DM. Targeting the gut–lung microbiota axis by means of a high-fibre diet and probiotics may have anti-inflammatory effects in COVID-19 infection. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020;14:1753466620937170. doi: 10.1177/1753466620937170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsai CC, Hsih HY, Chiu HH, Lai YY, Liu JH, Yu B, Tsen HY. Antagonistic activity against Salmonella infection in vitro and in vivo for two Lactobacillus strains from swine and poultry. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;102(2):185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim Y, Kim SH, Whang KY, Kim YJ, Oh S. Inhibition of Escherichia coli O157:H7 attachment by interactions between lactic acid bacteria and intestinal epithelial cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(7):1278–1285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K, Oshima K, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, Tobe T, Clarke JM, Topping DL, Suzuki T. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 2011;469(7331):543–547. doi: 10.1038/nature09646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(10):777–788. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hassan M, Diep DB, Javadzadeh Y, Dastmalchi S, Nes IF, Sharifi Y, Yari S, Farajnia S, Lotfipour F. Prevalence of bacteriocin activities and bacteriocin-encoding genes in enterococcal clinical isolates in Iran. Can J Microbiol. 2012;58(4):359–368. doi: 10.1139/w11-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Corr SC, Li Y, Riedel CU, O'Toole PW, Hill C, Gahan CG. Bacteriocin production as a mechanism for the antiinfective activity of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(18):7617–7621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700440104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Medellin-Peña MJ, Wang H, Johnson R, Anand S, Griffiths MW. Probiotics affect virulence-related gene expression in Escherichia coli O157: H7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(13):4259–4267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00159-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yun B, Oh S, Griffiths M. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates the virulence of Clostridium difficile. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(8):4745–4758. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-7921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li J, Wang W, Xu SX, Magarvey NA, McCormick JK. Lactobacillus reuteri-produced cyclic dipeptides quench agr-mediated expression of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in staphylococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(8):3360–3365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017431108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miyamoto J, Mizukure T, Park S-B, Kishino S, Kimura I, Hirano K, Bergamo P, Rossi M, Suzuki T, Arita M. A gut microbial metabolite of linoleic acid, 10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenoic acid, ameliorates intestinal epithelial barrier impairment partially via GPR40-MEK-ERK pathway. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(5):2902–2918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.610733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dahiya DK, Puniya AK. Evaluation of survival, free radical scavenging and human enterocyte adherence potential of lactobacilli with anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory CLA isomer-producing attributes. J Food Process Preserv. 2015;39(6):2866–2877. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yadav H, Lee J-H, Lloyd J, Walter P, Rane SG. Beneficial metabolic effects of a probiotic via butyrate-induced GLP-1 hormone secretion. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(35):25088–25097. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.452516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang J, Ji H, Wang S, Liu H, Zhang W, Zhang D, Wang Y. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum promotes intestinal barrier function by strengthening the epithelium and modulating gut microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1953. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Joyce SA, MacSharry J, Casey PG, Kinsella M, Murphy EF, Shanahan F, Hill C, Gahan CG. Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(20):7421–7426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323599111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Costabile A, Buttarazzi I, Kolida S, Quercia S, Baldini J, Swann JR, Brigidi P, Gibson GR. An in vivo assessment of the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum ECGC 13110402 in normal to mildly hypercholesterolaemic adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CG. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(3):1729–1738. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1729-1738.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sarkar A, Lehto SM, Harty S, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Burnet PW. Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria–gut–brain signals. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(11):763–781. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, Bienenstock J, Cryan JF. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(38):16050–16055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102999108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perez-Burgos A, Wang L, McVey Neufeld KA, Mao YK, Ahmadzai M, Janssen LJ, Stanisz AM, Bienenstock J, Kunze WA. The TRPV1 channel in rodents is a major target for antinociceptive effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. J Physiol. 2015;593(17):3943–3957. doi: 10.1113/JP270229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rousseaux C, Thuru X, Gelot A, Barnich N, Neut C, Dubuquoy L, Dubuquoy C, Merour E, Geboes K, Chamaillard M. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med. 2007;13(1):35–37. doi: 10.1038/nm1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ryan KA, Jayaraman T, Daly P, Canchaya C, Curran S, Fang F, Quigley EM, O’Toole PW. Isolation of lactobacilli with probiotic properties from the human stomach. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;47(4):269–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Duangjitcharoen Y, Kantachote D, Ongsakul M, Poosaran N, Chaiyasut C. Selection of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented plant beverages. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11(4):652. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.652.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nozari S, Faridvand Y, Etesami A, Ahmad Khan Beiki M, Miresmaeili Mazrakhondi SA, Abdolalizadeh J. Potential anticancer effects of cell wall protein fractions from Lactobacillus paracasei on human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2019;69(3):148–154. doi: 10.1111/lam.13198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nozari S, Mohammadzadeh M, Faridvand Y, Tockmechi A, Movassaghpour A, Abdolalizadeh J. The study of extracellular protein fractions of probiotic candidate bacteria on cancerous cell line. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19(11):779–785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ortuño J, Cuesta A, Rodríguez A, Esteban MA, Meseguer J. Oral administration of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enhances the cellular innate immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002;85(1):41–50. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(01)00406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tovar D, Zambonino J, Cahu C, Gatesoupe FJ, Vázquez-Juárez R, Lésel R. Effect of live yeast incorporation in compound diet on digestive enzyme activity in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture. 2002;204(1):113–123. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00650-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vohra A, Syal P, Madan A. Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016;219:31–47. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wu Y, Tang Y, Xiao N-Q, Wang C-H, Tan Z-J. Bacterial lactase gene characteristics in intestinal contents of antibiotic-associated diarrhea mice treated with Debaryomyces hansenii. Med Sci Monit: Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2020;26:e920879–e920871. doi: 10.12659/MSM.920879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhaxi Y, Meng X, Wang W, Wang L, He Z, Zhang X, Pu W. Duan-Nai-An, A yeast probiotic, improves intestinal mucosa integrity and immune function in weaned piglets. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61279-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.van der Aa Kühle A, Skovgaard K, Jespersen L. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;101(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Palma ML, Zamith-Miranda D, Martins FS, Bozza FA, Nimrichter L, Montero-Lomeli M, Marques ET, Douradinha B. Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains as biotherapeutic tools: is there room for improvement? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(16):6563–6570. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6776-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kelesidis T, Pothoulakis C. Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii for the prevention and therapy of gastrointestinal disorders. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2012;5(2):111–125. doi: 10.1177/1756283X11428502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.McFarland LV. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(18):2202. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hatoum R, Labrie S, Fliss I. Antimicrobial and probiotic properties of yeasts: from fundamental to novel applications. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:421. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sougioultzis S, Simeonidis S, Bhaskar KR, Chen X, Anton PM, Keates S, Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP. Saccharomyces boulardii produces a soluble anti-inflammatory factor that inhibits NF-κB-mediated IL-8 gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;343(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oliveira DR, Lopes ACA, Pereira RA, Cardoso PG, Duarte WF. Selection of potentially probiotic Kluyveromyces lactis for the fermentation of cheese whey–based beverage. Ann Microbiol. 2019;69(13):1361–1372. doi: 10.1007/s13213-019-01518-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Maccaferri S, Klinder A, Brigidi P, Cavina P, Costabile A. Potential probiotic Kluyveromyces marxianus B0399 modulates the immune response in Caco-2 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells and impacts the human gut microbiota in an in vitro colonic model system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(4):956–964. doi: 10.1128/aem.06385-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ceugniez A, Coucheney F, Jacques P, Daube G, Delcenserie V, Drider D. Anti-Salmonella activity and probiotic trends of Kluyveromyces marxianus S-2-05 and Kluyveromyces lactis S-3-05 isolated from a French cheese, Tomme d'Orchies. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(6):575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Romanin DE, Llopis S, Genovés S, Martorell P, Ramón VD, Garrote GL, Rumbo M. Probiotic yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CIDCA 8154 shows anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress properties in in vivo models. Benefic Microbes. 2016;7(1):83–93. doi: 10.3920/bm2015.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Angulo M, Reyes-Becerril M, Cepeda-Palacios R, Tovar-Ramírez D, Esteban MÁ, Angulo C. Probiotic effects of marine Debaryomyces hansenii CBS 8339 on innate immune and antioxidant parameters in newborn goats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(5):2339–2352. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09621-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xie G, Wu Y, Zheng T, Shen K, Tan Z. Effect of Debaryomyces hansenii combined with Qiweibaizhu powder extract on the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated mice with diarrhea. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(3):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-2121-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qin Z, Yan L, Er-ha Y, Qiang W, Jin T, Yan Z. Research progress in isolation and identification methods of Bifidobacterium and its application. Anim Husbandry Feed Sci. 2010;3:5. [Google Scholar]
- 54.He L, Long C, Liu Y, Guo Y, Xiao N, Tan Z. Effects of Debaryomyces hansenii treatment on intestinal microorganisms in mice with antibiotics-induced diarrhea. 3 Biotech. 2017;7(5):347. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0953-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.He Y, Tang Y, Peng M, Xie G, Li W, Tan Z. Influence of Debaryomyces hansenii on bacterial lactase gene diversity in intestinal mucosa of mice with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zeng A, Peng M, Liu H, Guo Z, Xu J, Wang S, He L, Tan Z. Effects of Debaryomyces hansenii treatment on intestinal mucosa microecology in mice with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fernández M, Hudson JA, Korpela R, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG. Impact on human health of microorganisms present in fermented dairy products: an overview. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:412714. doi: 10.1155/2015/412714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.dos Reis SA, da Conceição LL, Siqueira NP, Rosa DD, da Silva LL, Peluzio MCG. Review of the mechanisms of probiotic actions in the prevention of colorectal cancer. Nutr Res. 2017;37:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fortin O, Aguilar-Uscanga B, Vu KD, Salmieri S, Lacroix M. Cancer chemopreventive, antiproliferative, and superoxide anion scavenging properties of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii cell wall components. Nutr Cancer. 2018;70(1):83–96. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1380204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Newton PT. New insights into niclosamide action: autophagy activation in colorectal cancer. Biochem J. 2019;476(5):779–781. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20190020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Chaiyasut C. The role of probiotics in colorectal cancer management. Evid-Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:3535982. doi: 10.1155/2020/3535982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shamekhi S, Lotfi H, Abdolalizadeh J, Bonabi E, Zarghami N (2020) An overview of yeast probiotics as cancer biotherapeutics: possible clinical application in colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol:1–13 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 64.Chen X, Yang G, Song J-H, Xu H, Li D, Goldsmith J, Zeng H, Parsons-Wingerter PA, Reinecker H-C, Kelly CP. Probiotic yeast inhibits VEGFR signaling and angiogenesis in intestinal inflammation. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mirone G, Shukla A, Marfe G. Signaling mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-and anti-angiogenic inhibitors cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;97:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vetvicka V. Glucan-immunostimulant, adjuvant, potential drug. World J Clin Oncol. 2011;2(2):115. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i2.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chan GC-F, Chan WK, Sze DM-Y. The effects of β-glucan on human immune and cancer cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2009;2(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-2-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Driscoll M, Hansen R, Ding C, Cramer DE, Yan J. Therapeutic potential of various beta-glucan sources in conjunction with anti-tumor monoclonal antibody in cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(3):218–225. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.3.7337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yan J, Allendorf DJ, Brandley B. Yeast whole glucan particle (WGP) beta-glucan in conjunction with antitumour monoclonal antibodies to treat cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2005;5(5):691–702. doi: 10.1517/14712598.5.5.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ghoneum M, Gollapudi S. Induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the baker's yeast, in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2004;24(3a):1455–1463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ghoneum M, Hamilton J, Brown J, Gollapudi S. Human squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and colon undergoes apoptosis upon phagocytosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the baker's yeast, in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2005;25(2A):981–989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Shamekhi S, Abdolalizadeh J, Ostadrahimi A, Mohammadi SA, Barzegari A, Lotfi H, Bonabi E, Zarghami N. Apoptotic Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on human colon cancer SW480 cells by regulation of Akt/NF-ĸB signaling pathway. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12(1):311–319. doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-09528-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rajan T, Benluvankar V, Vincent S. Saccharomyces cerevisiae-induced apoptosis of monolayer cervical cancer cells. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10(8):63–66. doi: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i8.18818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ghoneum M, Badr El-Din NK, Noaman E, Tolentino L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Baker's Yeast, suppresses the growth of Ehrlich carcinoma-bearing mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57(4):581–592. doi: 10.1007/s00262-007-0398-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ghoneum M, Matsuura M, Braga M, Gollapudi S. S. cerevisiae induces apoptosis in human metastatic breast cancer cells by altering intracellular Ca2+ and the ratio of Bax and Bcl-2. Int J Oncol. 2008;33(3):533–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sambrani R, Abdolalizadeh J, Kohan L, Jafari B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits growth and metastasis and stimulates apoptosis in HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line. Comp Clin Pathol. 2019;28(4):985–995. doi: 10.1007/s00580-018-2855-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Subbiah MT, Abplanalp W. Ergosterol (major sterol of baker's and brewer's yeast extracts) inhibits the growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro and the potential role of its oxidation products. International journal for vitamin and nutrition research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung Journal International de Vitaminologie et de. Nutrition. 2003;73(1):19–23. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.73.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Oliveira RJ, Matuo R, da Silva AF, Matiazi HJ, Mantovani MS, Ribeiro LR. Protective effect of β-glucan extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, against DNA damage and cytotoxicity in wild-type (k1) and repair-deficient (xrs5) CHO cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2007;21(1):41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2006.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Demir G, Klein HO, Mandel-Molinas N, Tuzuner N. Beta glucan induces proliferation and activation of monocytes in peripheral blood of patients with advanced breast cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. 2007;7(1):113–116. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2006.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yoon TJ, Kim TJ, Lee H, Shin KS, Yun YP, Moon WK, Kim DW, Lee KH. Anti-tumor metastatic activity of β-glucan purified from mutated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int Immunopharmacol. 2008;8(1):36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Javmen A, Nemeikaite-Ceniene A, Grigiskis S, Jonauskiene I, Rudenkov M, Kacianauskas D, Mauricas M. S. cerevisiae $\beta $-glucan reduced viability of mouse hepatoma cells in vitro. Turk J Biol. 2015;39(4):562–566. doi: 10.3906/biy-1411-53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mo L, Chen Y, Li W, Guo S, Wang X, An H, Zhan Y. Anti-tumor effects of (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in S180 tumor-bearing mice. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;95:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Chen X, Fruehauf J, Goldsmith JD, Xu H, Katchar KK, Koon HW, Zhao D, Kokkotou EG, Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP. Saccharomyces boulardii Inhibits EGF receptor signaling and intestinal tumor growth in Apcmin mice. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):914–923. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Magnani M, Castro-Gomez RH, Nobrega Aoki M, Pereira Gregório E, Libos F, Ehara Watanabe MA. Effects of carboxymethyl-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the peripheral blood cells of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2010;1(5):859–862. doi: 10.3892/etm.2010.121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Salar M, Amir T, Majid N. Comparison of anti-tumor properties of the cell walls of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardi probiotics, individually and in combination with iron nanoparticles on K562 cancer cell line. Basic Clin Cancer Res. 2014;6(4):37–47. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Abedi J, Saatloo MV, Nejati V, Hobbenaghi R, Tukmechi A, Nami Y, Khosroushahi AY. Selenium-enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces the progression of colorectal cancer. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2018;185(2):424–432. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Porto BAA, Monteiro CF, Souza ÉLS, Leocádio PCL, Alvarez-Leite JI, Generoso SV, Cardoso VN, Almeida-Leite CM, Santos DA, Santos JRA, Nicoli JR, Pessione E, Martins FS. Treatment with selenium-enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae UFMG A-905 partially ameliorates mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;84(1):117–126. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03865-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chan J, Cheung J, Luk S, Wu Y, Pang S, Fung K. Anti-cancer and pro-apoptotic effects of an herbal medicine and Saccharomyces cerevisiae product (CKBM) on human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells in vitro and in vivo. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2004;26(4):597–609. doi: 10.1081/IPH-200042357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Badr El-Din NK, Mahmoud AZ, Hassan TA, Ghoneum M. Baker’s yeast sensitizes metastatic breast cancer cells to paclitaxel in vitro. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17(2):542–550. doi: 10.1177/1534735417740630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Saadat YR, Khosroushahi AY, Movassaghpour AA, Talebi M, Gargari BP. Modulatory role of exopolysaccharides of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii as probiotic yeasts from dairy products in human colon cancer cells. J Funct Foods. 2020;64:103675. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103675. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Kourelis A, Kotzamanidis C, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki E, Scouras ZG, Tzanetakis N, Yiangou M. Preliminary probiotic selection of dairy and human yeast strains. J Biol Res. 2010;13:93. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shamloo HB, Shahabi A, Aghazadeh Z, Yari Khosroushahi A (2020) Pichia fermentans originates apoptosis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma by over-expressing BAX and CASP 9 genes. Cytotechnology:1–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]