Haemophagocytic syndrome and COVID-19

Abstract

Primary and secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) are hyperferritinaemic hyperinflammatory syndromes with a common terminal pathway triggered by different etiopathogenetic factors. HLH is characterised by a decreased capacity of interferon gamma production with an activated NK phenotype profile similar to other hyperinflammatory syndromes. Viruses are closely linked to the development of HLH as infectious triggers, and the break of tolerance to self-antigens is considered a critical mechanism involved in the development of immune-mediated conditions triggered by viral infections. Emerging studies in patients with COVID-19 are suggesting a key role of monocytes/macrophages in the pathogenesis of this viral infection, and there is a significant overlap between several features reported in severe COVID-19 and the features included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. Therefore, SARS-Cov-2, as other respiratory viruses, may also be considered a potential etiological trigger of HLH. The frequency of HLH in adult patients with severe COVID-19 is lower than 5%, although this figure could be underestimated considering that most reported cases lacked information about some specific criteria (mainly the histopathological criteria and the measurement of NK cell function and sCD25 levels). Because HLH is a multi-organ syndrome, the diagnostic approach in a patient with severe COVID-19 in whom HLH is suspected must be carried out in a syndromic and holistic way, and not in the light of isolated clinical or laboratory features. In COVID-19 patients presenting with persistent high fever, progressive pancytopenia, and hepatosplenic involvement, together with the characteristic triad of laboratory abnormalities (hyperferritinaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, and hypofibrinogenaemia), the suspicion of HLH is high, and the diagnostic workup must be completed with specific immunological and histopathological studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-020-05569-4.

Introduction

In January, 2020, a novel virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified as the causative agent for a cluster of pneumonia cases initially detected in Wuhan City (China). The lack of prior immunity to the virus has resulted in a rapid increase of infected patients across the globe [1], and the current status of this pandemic infection (December 15, 2020) includes more than 70 million confirmed worldwide cases and nearly two millions of deaths (https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=CjwKCAjwrcH3BRApEiwAxjdPTcruNm9OZHGuwIcAzLl6ZMuoBXCXswyh8SI2_DCQiVaAZliNViNrGhoCBKsQAvD_BwE). The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 has a very wide clinical spectrum, the majority of patients (80%) experienced mild disease, 14% severe disease and 5% a critical disease (respiratory and/or systemic failure). Inflammation has a predominant lung-centred pattern, although the loss of “front line” anti-viral defence mechanisms may activate in some patients an exaggerated hyperinflammatory response against the virus that actually contributes to worsening the infectious disease rather than accelerating its resolution [2].

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) can be defined as a hyperferritinaemic hyperinflammatory syndrome that may be primary (a paediatric condition driven by germline mutations impairing granule-mediated cytotoxicity) or secondary (mainly reported in adults, and often driven by infection, malignancy systemic diseases or drugs [3]. Clinically, HLH is a systemic disease characterised by persistent fever, progressive cytopenias and multi-organ dysfunction caused by an uncontrolled immune activation associated with excessive cytokine production [3]. Immunopathologically, HLH is characterised by a decreased capacity of interferon gamma production and an activated NK phenotype profile (increased CD69, ICAM-1, HLADR, CCR5 expression) similar to other hyperinflammatory diseases [4]. CD163 macrophages are involved in hyperferritinaemic syndromes given their role in reticuloendothelial iron signalling, hence sHLH is also known as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) especially in paediatric literature [5].

The frequent description of raised ferritin levels and its association with a worse prognosis stand out in early reported studies of COVID-19 [6], with a reasonable parallelism with HLH (hyperferritinaemic syndrome associated with high mortality), and therefore, several studies have suggested a close relationship between severe COVID-19 and HLH [7]. In this review, we analyse the different types of hyperinflammatory syndromes associated with COVID-19, their similarities and differences with respect to HLH, and the degree of association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and HLH.

Systemic inflammatory syndromes related to COVID-19

The initial stage of direct damage caused by the SARS-CoV-2 in the respiratory tract can be followed by a subsequent hyperinflammatory response to the virus [8], with raised levels of inflammatory markers that have been correlated with poor outcomes (severe disease, mortality) [9]. However, the clinical phenotype of systemic inflammatory syndrome related to COVID-19 is heterogeneous and appears to be mainly driven by the age, being close to Kawasaki disease in children, while in adults it shares significant features with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or HLH.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

In April 2020, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health in the UK described a paediatric syndrome that was called Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome—temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS) [10]; in the USA, this syndrome was referred as Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C) [11], and an additional definition was further provided by the World Health Organization [12]. The three case definitions are similar and describe a population of children with evidence of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection (or exposure to a suspected or confirmed case) presenting with persistent fever, clinical features and laboratory abnormalities reflecting ongoing inflammation, and systemic involvement (including especially cardiac involvement) in the absence of other reasonable aetiologies [13]. In a recently reported consensus, patients with MIS-C have been classified into two main phenotypes (nonspecific phenotype, and Kawasaki disease-like phenotype) [14], although the distinction was mainly based on expert opinion rather than in a clearly-proven differentiated clinical and biological profile [15]. This syndrome has been reported exclusively in children and adolescents with COVID-19, but a recent study [16] have described 27 additional cases in adults (age > 21 years) that fulfilled MIS-C (Table 1). The authors have called the syndrome as MIS-A (Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in adults), all patients but one belonged to racial or ethnic minority groups. In 70% of reported cases, MIS-A was diagnosed 2–5 weeks after the development of the typical COVID-19 symptoms, while the remaining 30% did not present symptoms of acute infection (showing negative PCR) and SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed with SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results, suggesting that MIS-A and MIS-C could be immune-related postinfectious processes [16]. In both children and adults, MIS has a specific phenotype close to Kawasaki disease, with a very limited overlap with HLH.

Table 1.

Definition of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) [30]

Definition of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A)

1) A severe illness requiring hospitalisation in a person aged ≥ 21 years.

2) A positive test result for current or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (nucleic acid, antigen, or antibody) during admission or in the previous 12 weeks.

3) Severe dysfunction of one or more extrapulmonary organ systems (e.g. hypotension or shock, cardiac dysfunction, arterial or venous thrombosis or thromboembolism, or acute liver injury).

4) Laboratory evidence of severe inflammation (e.g. elevated CRP, ferritin, D-dimer, or interleukin-6).

5) Absence of severe respiratory illness (to exclude patients in which inflammation and organ dysfunction might be attributable simply to tissue hypoxia).

- Patients with mild respiratory symptoms who met these criteria were included.

- Patients were excluded if alternative diagnoses such as bacterial sepsis were identified.

Hyperinflammatory syndromes in adults

The clinical progression of COVID-19 towards a critical illness has been linked to the abnormal functioning of the two parts of the immune system (innate and adaptive responses). At early stages of the infection, a weak interferon response may delay the neutrophil recruitment to achieve an effective viral clearance, causing a sustained immune stimulation and the release of an exaggerated amount of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), CCL4 (macrophage inflammatory protein-1β), CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) and CXCL9 (monokine induced by interferon-γ) [17]. Until now, little is known about what genetic and epigenetic factors can be related with the development of a hyperinflammatory syndrome triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection [18], although it seems that IL-6 can play a central etiopathogenic role in severe COVID-19 infection. The IL-6-centred hypercytokinaemia has a close pathogenic link with hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulation responses, promoting the synthesis of several liver proteins, such as pentraxins (i.e. C reactive protein -CRP-) and ferritin, which are multifunctional proteins at the crossroads of immunity and inflammation, and it seems that the excess of circulating “free iron” detectable during severe inflammatory conditions can deteriorate the inflammatory reaction with the particular ability to induce a marked pro-coagulant state [19]. In patients with severe COVID-19 and increased serum levels of inflammatory mediators, the clinical scenario has been compared to that reported in other life-threatening conditions such as CRS, ARDS and HLH.

CRS is a condition associated with the release of large quantities of cytokines due to the dysregulated/perpetuated activation of lymphocytes and macrophages, leading to overwhelming systemic inflammation and multi-organ failure with high mortality [3] and that has been described in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or in those receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies (CAR-T) [20]. Although the mechanisms of severe COVID-19 are still being elucidated [21], the term cytokine storm syndrome has become synonymous with its pathophysiology and even often switched with the term CRS [22]. However, a recent review has compared COVID-19 with other critical illnesses associated with elevated cytokine concentrations, showing that mean IL-6 concentrations were nearly 100 times higher in patients with CRS, 27 times higher in patients with sepsis and 12 times higher in patients with ARDS unrelated to COVID-19 in comparison with IL-6 concentrations reported in patients with COVID-19, questioning the use of the term cytokine storm in COVID-19 [23].

Viral pneumonias may be complicated by ARDS, a severe form of inflammatory pulmonary injury characterised by increased vascular permeability in the lungs, that is clinically defined by severe hypoxaemia and bilateral infiltrates on X-Ray imaging after excluding other etiologies (mainly cardiac failure and volume overload). Some patients with COVID-19 infection may develop a severe, acute lung injury caused by the virus under the umbrella of the hyperinflammatory phenotype of ARDS [24, 25]. Other coronavirus such as severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV) may also produce an acute lung injury associated with an exaggerated pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine systemic response [26]. In COVID-19 ARDS patients, a recent study has demonstrated a severely hyperinflammatory milieu in both the lungs and peripheral blood but characterised by activated lymphocytes in low numbers, a specific immunologic profile was identified in the lungs, consisting of a depleted and exhausted CD4 and CD8 T cell population prevailing those subtypes involved in both reparative and destructive processes [27].

Viruses are closely linked to the development of HLH in adults as infectious triggers. In a review of nearly 2200 reported cases of HLH reported in adults [28], infection was responsible of half the cases, with nearly 70% being linked to viruses, mainly herpesviruses. HLH was associated with viral pneumonias (adenovirus, influenza and parainfluenza viruses) in less than 5% of reported HLH-related infection cases [28]. Since 2000, we have identified 54 reported cases of HLH triggered by respiratory viruses (overwhelmingly related to adenovirus and influenza infections) (Supplementary Table 1); SARS-Cov-2, as other respiratory viruses, may also be considered a potential etiological trigger of HLH.

Haemophagocytic syndrome related to COVID-19

Macrophages are innate immune cells that respond to external threats by producing inflammatory molecules that eliminate microbes and promote tissue repair [29]. However, an exaggerated or dysregulated macrophage response can be damaging to the host, as is seen in the HLH induced by severe infections [30]. Several studies have suggested a pathogenic role of monocytes/macrophages in COVID-19 [31], although the specific drivers of activation of these cells and their specific contribution to the immunomediated damage remain inconclusive [29]. Exaggerated monocyte/macrophage activation can induce an overstated pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine systemic response that may be included under the umbrella of hyperinflammatory syndromes that, like HLH, have a similar etiopathogenic pathway (a specific external agent triggering a systemic immune dysregulation) [32], and a recent review has suggested that the hyperinflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 may have a significant pathogenic overlap with a viral-induced HLH (that is, macrophage activation with a cytokine overproduction and impairment of NK-cells and CD8+ T cells) [8].

In order to analyse the degree of association between SARS infection and HLH, we will first review the overlap of manifestations shared by severe COVID-19 and HLH, and then the available scientific evidence regarding the number of patients with severe COVID-19 who fulfil the criteria commonly used for the diagnosis of HLH in daily practice.

Overlap between severe COVID-19 and HLH

There is a significant overlap between several features reported in patients with severe COVID-19 and those included in the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria (clinical features, laboratory abnormalities, immunological profile and histopathological data), which were developed designed for the HLH diagnosis for paediatric population but that are also used in adults.

Among those clinical features of HLH that can be overlapped with COVID-19, fever is a key marker of COVID-19, while splenomegaly is overwhelmingly not studied or not reported in the largest series of unselected patients with infection [33]. However, a review of recent studies centred on collect HLH-related features in COVID-19 patients has reported a frequency of hepatomegaly/splenomegaly in 15% of patients (Table 2) [33–42], suggesting that in COVID-19, splenomegaly is not much frequent as that reported in HLH patients.

Table 2.

Frequency of the individual HLH-2004 classification criteria according to the data included in studies centred on collect HLH-related features in COVID-19 patients [34–43]

HLH features	N	n	%	First author (reference)
Hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly	152	23	15.1	Hakim [34], Loscocco [35], Prieto-Pérez [36], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Cytopenias (2 lineages)	990	32	3.2	Feld [38], Hakim [34], Loscocco [35], Prieto-Pérez [36], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Cytopenias (3 lineages)	152	6	3.9	Hakim [34], Loscocco [35], Prieto-Pérez [36], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Ferritine > 500 ng/mL	895	738	82.4	Feld [38], Hakim [34], Prieto-Pérez [36], Wood [33]
Ferritine > 1000 ng/mL	855	513	60	Feld [38], Hakim [34], Prieto-Pérez [36]
Ferritine > 10,000 ng/mL	895	57	6.3	Feld [38], Hakim [34], Prieto-Pérez [36], Wood [33]
Ferritine < 2000 ng/mL	135	90	66.6	Loscocco [35], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Ferritine 2000–6000 ng/mL	135	33	24.4	Loscocco [35], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Ferritine > 6000 ng/mL	135	12	8.8	Loscocco [35], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Hypertriglyceridaemia	975	90	9.2	Feld [38], Hakim [34], Loscocco [35], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Hypofibrinogenaemia	1003	14	1.3	Feld [38], Hakim [33], Lee [39], Loscocco [35], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]
Haemophagocytosis	60	19	31.6	Prieto-Pérez [36], Wood [33]
HLH > = 5 criteria	22	0	0	Feld [38]
HScore > 169	428	17	3.9	Clark [41], Giamarellos-Bourboulis [42], Hakim [3], Ruscitti [37], Wood [33]

With respect to haematological abnormalities, lymphopenia is a key feature of COVID-19 infection, not only by their high frequency (around half the cases) but also by their prognostic significance (it has been related to ARDS development, need of ICU care and poor survival), while thrombocytopenia and anaemia have been reported in 24% and 59%, respectively [43]. Cytopenias are overwhelmingly asymptomatic, and symptomatic autoimmune cases (thrombocytopenic purpura, haemolytic anaemia) have been infrequently reported in COVID-19 infection. In contrast to HLH, the frequency of concomitant cytopenias (bicytopenia, pancytopenia) in patients with COVID-19 is very low (3–4%) (Table 2).

Among biochemical parameters, the typical triad of abnormalities in HLH includes hypertriglyceridaemia, hypofibrinogenaemia and hyperferritinaemia. Triglyceride levels are not usually measured in the standard of care of patients with COVID-19, and in studies focused on investigating HLH-related features in COVID-19, 90/975 (9%) patients showed hypertriglyceridaemia (Table 2) [33–35, 37, 38], and one study has reported no significant differences for mean TG levels between non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients [44]. In addition, the use of tocilizumab should always be discarded as a potential cause of hypertriglyceridaemia in patients with COVID-19 [45, 46]. With respect to fibrinogen levels, patients with COVID-19 often have hyperfibrinogenaemia in opposite to HLH, since systemic inflammation and increased IL-6 levels promote the synthesis of fibrinogen. However, some COVID-19 patients with a progressive severe disease may develop hypofibrinogenaemia preceding the development of severe disorders like disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) or HLH [47]. The frequency of hypofibrinogenaemia in COVID-19 reported in several studies is 1.3% [33–35, 37–39], although in severe COVID-19 patients (admitted in the ICU, non-survivors), the frequency raised to 28–30% [48, 49], and most patients with hypofibrinogenaemia fulfilled the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) diagnostic criteria for DIC [48]. Finally, hyperferritinaemia is a frequent laboratory abnormality detected in COVID-19 patients, although most large series expressed the values as a mean, with only two reported categorised results with a frequency of raised ferritin levels in 45–78% of cases using different thresholds for defining hyperferritinaemia [33, 50, 51]. In studies centred on collecting HLH-related features in COVID-19 patients, hyperferritinaemia has reported in 82% of patients, with levels higher than 1000 ng/mL in 60% and higher than 10,000 ng/mL in only 6.3% of patients (Table 2). Since hyperferritinaemia is the hallmark of the “hyperferritinemic syndromes” [19], several authors have suggested that COVID-19 could be included into the umbrella of these syndromes that include systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), catastrophic anti-phospholipid syndrome and HLH/MAS, all sharing a severe clinical presentation with a high mortality rate [52]. There is no specific threshold proposed for differentiating COVID-19 and HLH, although it seems that levels higher than 6000 ng/mL (and especially, higher than 10,000 ng/mL) are infrequently reported in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria included two highly specific immunological criteria (decreased NK cell function and increased levels of IL-2R/CD25s). In viral infections, a defective cytotoxicity leads to the accumulation of antigenic stimuli, perpetuating inflammation and triggering tissue damage, and recent studies in COVID-19 patients have reported a decreased NK cell function, including a negative correlation between number of NK cells and IL-6 levels [53] and a profound depletion of NK cells [42], especially in severe patients [54]. IL-6 and IL-10 have the capacity to reduce NK cell cytotoxicity (IL-6 may reduce the expression of perforin and granzyme B while IL-10 negative correlate with NK cell cytotoxicity, through a reduction in IFN- and IL-2 expression) [55, 56]. With respect to IL-2R levels, CD25 is expressed by T cells during immune activation and its soluble form (also known as IL-2R), is released into the bloodstream [57]. In COVID-19 patients, some studies have reported that sCD25 levels correlated positively with IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and TNF-α, and negatively with lymphocyte count and disease severity [58], especially in patients with diabetes [59] or cancer [60]. Unfortunately, NK cell function and sCD25 levels have not been tested in the main series of COVID-19 patients with suspected HLH, although according to the results obtained in basic studies carried out in patients with COVID-19, it seems reasonable to suppose that we could find a similar immunological profile in patients with HLH associated with COVID-19 (reduced NK cell function and raised levels of CD25s).

Haemophagocytosis (phagocytosis of haematopoietic cells by activated macrophages) is considered the key marker of HLH but is not a sine qua non criterion for its diagnosis and should always be interpreted in the clinical context, since it is a physiological process that may be enhanced in some situations, including blood transfusions, infection, autoimmune diseases and other causes of bone marrow failure or red blood cell destruction. Haemophagocytic activity may not occur at any given time in any given organ during the disease course and may be absent in the initial stages of HLH, and therefore, repeat biopsies are recommended in patients with a high clinical and biological suspicion [28]. Although early studies stated that patients with severe COVID-19 may not be in a good enough condition to undertake a bone marrow examination searching for HLH, the severe clinical scenario is not different from that in HLH patients, and should be carried out when HLH is suspected. Haemophagocytosis can be linked to one of the key immunological abnormalities reported in severe COVID-19 (abnormal macrophage activation) and has been started to be described in patients with COVID-19, both in post-mortem and clinical studies [33, 36, 61–63].

HLH associated with COVID-19

The number of reported cases of HLH in patients with COVID-19 has progressively increased throughout 2020. Table 3 summarises the main features of 60 patients with severe COVID-19 in whom HLH was suspected or diagnosed, and in whom details about the fulfilment of the individual HLH-2004 criteria are available [34, 36, 61, 64–83]. Most cases were men, with a mean age of 56 years, and the main presenting features included hyperferritinaemia (97%), raised AST levels (93%), fever (71%), hypertriglyceridaemia (47%), thrombocytopenia (48%) and splenomegaly (44%). Although most of these cases are reported by the authors as probable or definite HLH, only 8 (13%) fulfilled at least 5 of the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. However, most patients have no data on several HLH criteria, especially biopsy that was carried out in only 30% of patients, and measurement of NK function and sCD35 levels, that were measured in only 5% of cases. Among the reported 60 cases, 8 were ongoing on the ICU, 24 were discharged and 28 died (a mortality rate of 54%).

Table 3.

A summary of the main features of 60 patients with severe COVID-19 in whom HLH was suspected and details about the fulfilment of the individual HLH classification criteria are available [35, 37, 62, 67–86]

		n/N (%)
Total cases		60 (100)
Country	USA	21 (35)
	Spain	8 (13.3)
	Greece	7 (11.6)
	UK	7 (11.6)
	France	4 (6.6)
	Italy	4 (6.6)
	Iran	2 (3.3)
	Brazil	2 (3.3)
	Belgium	1 (1.6)
	Czech Republic	1 (1.6)
	India	1 (1.6)
	Netherlands	1 (1.6)
	Switzerland	1 (1.6)
Age	Mean age (range)	55,6 (7–91)
Sex	Female	19 (31.7)
Known immuno-suppression		14/42 (33.3)
Fever (°C)	Fever (yes)	42/59 (71.1)
	38–39	12/26 (46.1)
	39–40	6/26 (23)
	> 40	8/26 (30.7)
Megalies	Hepatomegaly	1/25 (4)
	Splenomegaly	5/25 (20)
	Both	6/25 (24)
Cytopenias	Nil lineage (0)	29/56 (51.7)
	One-cell lineage	17/56 (30.3)
	Two-cell lineages	6/56 (10.7)
	Three-cell lineages	4/56 (7.1)
Haemoglobin level	> 12	22/44 (50)
	9–12	8/44 (18.1)
	< 9	14/44 (31.8)
Neutrophils count	Normal	32/35 (91.4)
	≤ 1000	3/35 (8.6)
Platelets count	Normal	25/48 (52.1)
	< 100,000	23/48 (47.9)
Ferritin levels (ng/mL)	High	56/58 (96.6)
	< 500	5/56 (8.9)
	500–1000	9/56 (16.1)
	1000–10,000	28/56 (50.0)
	> 10,000	14/56 (25.0)
Hypertriglyceridaemia (> 256 mg/dL, > 3 mmol/L)	No	19/36 (52.7)
	Yes	17/36 (47.2)
Hypofibrinogenaemia (< 1.5 mg/L, < 150 mg/dL))	No	24/33 (72.7)
	Yes	9/33 (27.2)
AST (IU/l)	< 30	3/42 (7.1)
	> 30	39/42 (92.8)
Low sIL-2R levels and/or reduced NK cell function	Present	0/0 (0)
	Absence	6/6 (100)
Haemophagocytosis Bx	Present	15/18 (83.3)
	Absence	3/18 (16.6)
HLH 2004 (number of criteria fulfilled)*	0	1 (1.7)
	1–2	30 (50)
	3–4	21 (35)
	> 5	8 (13.3)
HScore*	< 90	31 (51.6)
	100–160	22 (36.6)
	> 169	7 (11.6)
Outcome	ICU discharge	24/60 (40)
	Death	28/60 (46.6)

*Most patients have no data on several HLH criteria (especially biopsy carried out in only 30% of patients, and measurement of NK function and sCD35 levels, measured in only 5%)

Discussion

The possible association between COVID-19 and HLH has generated an intense scientific debate with highly polarised positions. While some authors have suggested a close association and have recommended that all patients with severe COVID-19 should be screened for HLH [84], others argue that most of these patients actually develop an ARDS, sharing some HLH features, rather than presenting a systemic macrophage activation, the hallmark of HLH [85]. Probably, the clinical and biological scenario of severe COVID-19 is highly heterogeneous, mixing features of other life-threatening conditions like ARDS and HLH, and in fact, some authors are proposing a specific terminology and classification for severe COVID-19, such as that recently proposed by Webb et al. [86] (hyperinflammatory syndrome) including a specific set of criteria that could help to identify patients at higher risk of progression to mechanical ventilation and death (Table 4).

Table 4.

Criteria proposed for hyperinflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 [23]

Panel: proposed cHIS criteria

Fever

Defined as a temperature of more than 38.0 °C

Macrophage activation

Defined as a ferritin concentration of 700 μg/L or more✽

Haematological dysfunction

Defined as a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 10 or more, or both haemoglobin concentration of 9.2 g/dL or less and platelet count of 110 × 109 cells per L or less

Coagulopathy

Defined as a D-dimer concentration of 1.5 μg/mL or more

Hepatic injury

Defined as a lactate dehydrogenase concentration of 400 U/L or more, or an aspartate aminotransferase concentration of 100 U/L or more

Cytokinaemia

Defined as an interleukin-6 concentration of 15 pg/mL or more†, or a triglyceride concentration of 150 mg/dL or more‡, or a CRP§ concentration of 15 mg/dL or more¶

cHIS, COVID-19-associated hyperinflammatory syndrome; CRP, C-reactive protein

^✽Ferritin concentration might be elevated in end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis

^†Original validation used a 10 pg/mL threshold; post-hoc analysis suggested that 15 pg/mL has better discrimination for poor outcomes

^‡Triglycerides might be elevated due to concomitant propofol administration

^§Not high-sensitivity CRP

^¶CRP was not included in the original validation; post-hoc analysis confirmed use as a third surrogate for cytokinaemia

One of the key points for evaluating how close may be the association between HLH and severe COVID-19 is to analyse how many patients with severe COVID-19 fulfil the currently accepted HLH diagnostic criteria. According our review, it is clear that not all patients with severe COVID-19 will develop a fully blown HLH [87]. Less than 5% of adult patients with severe systemic COVID-19 fulfil the HLH criteria, a rate that could be underestimated considering that most reported cases lacked information about several criteria (mainly the histopathological criteria and the measurement of NK cell function and sCD25 levels) and therefore, it is not possible to discard the development of a full HLH in these cases incompletely evaluated. In the view of the limitations for applying the standard HLH criteria, most studies have used the HScore, a classification score developed specifically for secondary, and especially malignancy associated, HLH in adults, that does not include any cytokine-related criteria [3]; a HScore > 169 has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 86% for a HLH diagnosis. In studies searching for HLH in severe COVID-19 patients, there were 17 (4%) out of 428 patients that had a score > 169 [33, 34, 37, 41, 42] (Table 2), while in the individual reported cases summarised in Table 3, 7 (12%) had a score equal or higher than 169. The use of HScore for COVID-19 patients has been questioned after highlighting some limitations regarding temperature, leukopenia (the score does not distinguish between neutropenia and lymphocytopenia), and the lack of published data on hypertriglyceridaemia, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly and BM haemophagocytosis, and therefore, some authors recommend against their use due to a potential lack of sensitivity [35]. In children, the frequency of MAS has been evaluated in those with a severe presentation (MIS-C) and is higher than the figure estimated in adults, with 30 (25%) out of 118 children included in two studies [88, 89].

Despite the very rare occurrence of HLH in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (even in the most severe patients), some recommendations can be proposed in order to facilitate an early diagnosis of HLH in patients with severe COVID-19. An initial presentation consisting of a subacute persistence of high fever, together with enlargement of the liver and spleen, and a progressive severe pancytopenia (including especially thrombocytopenia), should be considered a highly suspicion clinical profile for HLH, always after discarding other etiologies (superimposed infections, cancer). The suspicion will be higher if the patient presents the typical HLH-related triad of laboratory abnormalities (hypertriglyceridaemia, low fibrinogen levels and hyperferritinaemia, especially very high levels, i.e. > 5000 ng/mL). In these patients, a complete study (immunological markers, histopathological confirmation of haemophagocytosis) searching for HLH should be advised.

Once the diagnosis of HLH is confirmed in a patient with COVID-19, a differentiated therapeutic approach with respect to patients without HLH may be considered, since an early intervention could be essential to avoiding irreversible organ-specific damages caused by HLH [90]. Unfortunately, many patients with severe COVID-19 will become critically ill before high-quality evidence of treatment efficacy is available and in daily practice, most physicians are extrapolating therapeutic data from current clinical experience in similar life-threatening conditions (ARDS, sepsis, CRS and HLH). HLH requires a triple therapeutic approach including vital support measures, elimination of potential triggers (mainly infection) and suppression of the exaggerated inflammatory response, an approach that can be applied in patients with severe COVID-19. Glucocorticoids are the key first-line option in patients with HLH [28] and also in those with COVID-19, considering the results of the RECOVERY trial [91], and their effect does not seem to hamper antiviral responses in patients with HLH associated with other viral infections [92]. Biological agents have also been considered for treating HLH. Among anticytokine agents, tocilizumab (anti–IL-6 receptor) has been reported effective in CRS associated with CAR-T therapy, an approach that is being considered for treating severe COVID-19 patients [93]. The use of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, tofacitinib) is currently under investigation in severe COVID-19 [94] with positive results recently reported in a controlled trial in association with remdesivir [95], as well as agents blocking GM-CSF (mavrililumab, lenzilumab) [96, 97]. Finally, emapalumab is a fully human anti-IFN gamma monoclonal antibody that has been approved in the US as second-line treatment of primary HLH [98] and that could be evaluated in adults with HLH-like presentations of COVID-19. Drugs modulating the immune response may be critical for treating HLH associated with severe COVID-19 [8], although neither the optimal timing nor the sequential schedule of using such therapies remains to be defined. Multidisciplinary management of severe COVID-19, with or without associated HLH, is essential.

Conclusions

The development of a life-threatening disease in patients with COVID-19 has brought most hospitals around the world to reach a level of usage of hospital beds (including conventional and intensive care beds) never seen in the modern history of medicine. Although it is a clinical scenario that affect less than 5% of people infected by SARS-CoV-2, this small percentage is critical considering we are dealing with a pandemic that has affected more than 70 million people worldwide in less than a year. The etiopathogenic mechanisms that drive such severe presentation in a such limited percentage of infected people are not fully understood. From a clinical point of view, these patients present with clinical and laboratory features that recall other life-threatening conditions associated with acute viral infections such as HLH. Unfortunately, we have few information regarding the longitudinal course of this specific subset of patients, and it is difficult to state that they present the same course that patients with HLH unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. According to the criteria that are used for the diagnosis of HLH in daily practice, the frequency of patients with severe COVID-19 that have been confirmed as having HLH is very low, something to be expected considering that HLH is per se a very rare condition. However, the current pandemic context can distort this if we consider the huge number of people hospitalised worldwide by severe COVID-19. The total number of COVID-19 patients fulfilling the HLH criteria is, at the time of writing this review, almost 10 times higher than all the cases of HLH reported in 2020 related to other respiratory viruses reported (Fig. 1). From a practical point of view, we recommend to assess the possible development of HLH in patients with severe COVID-19 who present with a highly suspicious clinical and laboratory profile, with the aim of evaluating for them the use of specific therapeutic approaches that could target immunopathological pathways common for both severe COVID-19 and HLH.

Fig. 1.

Viral pneumonias (adenovirus, RSV, metapneumovirus, influenza, and parainfluenza viruses) associated with HLH: reported cases (see references in Supplementary Table 1). Included the 28 reported cases of HLH related to COVID-19 fulfilling at least 5 HLH-2004 criteria and/or having a HScore > 169, and the 30 children fulfilling MAS criteria. Red circles = adults, blue circles = children

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

MR-C reported consultancy for BMS, Gilead; SR not declare, PBZ not declare, ASA not declare, AFC not declare, MJSC not declare.