ABSTRACT
Background
Polyphenols are natural compounds with anticarcinogenic properties in cellular and animal models, but epidemiological evidence determining the associations of these compounds with thyroid cancer (TC) is lacking.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relations between blood concentrations of 36 polyphenols and TC risk in EPIC (the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition).
Methods
A nested case–control study was conducted on 273 female cases (210 papillary, 45 follicular, and 18 not otherwise specified TC tumors) and 512 strictly matched controls. Blood polyphenol concentrations were analyzed by HPLC coupled to tandem MS after enzymatic hydrolysis.
Results
Using multivariable-adjusted conditional logistic regression models, caffeic acid (ORlog2: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.93) and its dehydrogenated metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (ORlog2: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.99), were inversely associated with differentiated TC risk. Similar results were observed for papillary TC, but not for follicular TC. Ferulic acid was also inversely associated only with papillary TC (ORlog2: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.91). However, none of these relations was significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. No association was observed for any of the remaining polyphenols with total differentiated, papillary, or follicular TC.
Conclusions
Blood polyphenol concentrations were mostly not associated with differentiated TC risk in women, although our study raises the possibility that high blood concentrations of caffeic, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic, and ferulic acids may be related to a lower papillary TC risk.
Keywords: polyphenol, biomarkers, thyroid cancer, EPIC, nested case–control study
Introduction
Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common endocrine cancer and is classified into 2 main groups: differentiated (mostly papillary and follicular) and nondifferentiated (e.g., anaplastic) carcinomas (1). TC is more frequent in women than in men, and its incidence has been increasing over the last 3 decades (2), which is partially attributable to overdiagnosis (3). To date, only few risk factors have been established (i.e., benign thyroid disease, radiation exposure, and body size) (4, 5). However, the role of dietary factors in TC carcinogenesis is not clearly understood (1).
Polyphenols are bioactive phytochemicals, abundant in the human diet and showing a high variability in their chemical structure. Over 500 individual polyphenols have been identified from dietary sources, almost exclusively plant-based foods (6). Once ingested, polyphenols are partially absorbed and conjugated in both the gut mucosa and liver. Many of the nonabsorbed compounds reach the colon, undergo extensive catabolism reactions by the microbiota, and finally can be absorbed as simple phenolic acids (7, 8).
Established biological properties of polyphenols include antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and chemopreventive effects (9). Polyphenols have been shown to induce apoptosis and inhibit cell proliferation and invasion in TC cells (10). However, epidemiological evidence on the association between polyphenol intake and TC risk is scarce and inconclusive. In a US cohort, dietary flavan-3-ol intake was negatively, whereas flavanones were positively, related to TC risk (11). In a previous analysis of dietary polyphenol intake and differentiated TC risk in the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) cohort the results were null, except in subjects with BMI (in kg/m2) ≥25, where inverse associations with intake of phenolic acids were detected (12). However, the assessment of polyphenol exposures using dietary questionnaires and food composition databases has well-known limitations. Polyphenol biomarkers constitute an alternative and objective way to estimate polyphenol exposures, taking into account interindividual variations in bioavailability (13, 14).
We hypothesized that polyphenols may have a preventive role in differentiated TC and polyphenol biomarkers may capture dietary exposure better than questionnaires. Therefore, our aim was to explore the associations between 36 blood polyphenol concentrations and differentiated TC risk, and the difference between TC histological subtypes, in women in a nested case–control study within the EPIC cohort.
Methods
Study population, sample, and data collection
EPIC is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study that enrolled 521,324 men and women, mainly between the ages of 35 and 70 y, predominantly from the general population of 10 European countries in the 1990s (15). All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and by the local ethical committees of the individual EPIC centers.
At baseline, habitual food and nutrient intake over the previous year was assessed via a validated center/country-specific dietary questionnaire (15) and the standardized EPIC Nutrient Database (16). Anthropometric data were measured, except in EPIC-Oxford, Norway, and France, where they were self-reported (15). Blood samples, from ∼80% of the EPIC cohort, were collected at recruitment according to standardized procedures and stored at the IARC under liquid-nitrogen (−196°C) for all countries, except in Denmark where they were stored under nitrogen-vapor (−150°C) (15).
Endpoint assessments
Primary incident TC cases were identified through record linkage with regional cancer registries in most of the centers, except in France, Germany, Greece, and Naples (Italy), where follow‐up was based on a combination of methods, including health insurance records, cancer and pathology registries, and active follow‐up evaluation of study participants and their next‐of‐kin. TC was defined as code C73 in the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). This analysis focused on differentiated TC, i.e., papillary (morphologic codes: 8050, 8130, 8260, 8340–8344, and 8350) and follicular carcinomas (morphologic codes: 8290 and 8330–8335), and not otherwise specified, which are likely to also be papillary carcinomas (8000, 8010, 8140). TC cases with rare or missing histological types (medullary, anaplastic, lymphoma, other morphologies) were not included. For each EPIC center, closure dates of the study period were defined as the latest dates of complete follow-up for both cancer incidence and vital status (between February 2011 and December 2015).
Nested case–control design
Only incident female TC cases were selected among participants with available blood samples at baseline, because the number of TC cases in men is very low in EPIC (n = 76) (17). Female controls were selected by incidence density sampling from all cohort members alive and free of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) at the time of diagnosis of the corresponding case and were also matched by study center, duration of follow‐up, age (±1 y), date of blood collection (±3 mo), time of blood collection (±1 h), and fasting status at the time of blood collection [<3 h (not fasting), 3–6 h (in between), or >6 h (fasting)]. For every case, 2 matched controls were identified. For some controls, there was not sample available as they were leftovers from a previous study (17).
Laboratory measurements
Samples—cases and matched controls—were leftovers of a previous EPIC study (17). No samples from Sweden remained for the analysis. Therefore, all samples experienced 1 freeze–thaw cycle before polyphenol analyses at the IARC. Polyphenol concentrations in biological samples are generally stable after freeze–thaw cycles (18, 19). Citrated plasma was used for the laboratory analyses except for the samples from Denmark (serum). Table 1 lists the 36 polyphenols measured. Blood polyphenols were measured by differential isotope labeling and LC electrospray ionization tandem MS. Detailed information on the method has been published elsewhere (20). Limits of quantification (LOQs) for the polyphenols varied between 0.11 nmol/L for daidzein and 44.4 nmol/L for quercetin and isorhamnetin. Blood polyphenol concentrations that fell below the LOQ were set to values corresponding to half the LOQ. All intrabatch CVs were <10%; whereas, all interbatch CVs were <20% (except for phloretin and enterodiol, for which the CVs were 22.0% and 21.5%, respectively). Samples from cases and matched controls were analyzed together, within the same analytical batch.
TABLE 1.
Median [IQR] plasma polyphenol concentrations and numbers of samples with concentrations below the LOQ among differentiated thyroid cancer cases and controls1
| Cases (n = 273) | Controls (n = 512) | P for differences2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma concentrations, nmol/L | n (%) < LOQ | Median [IQR] | n (%) < LOQ | Median [IQR] | |
| Flavonoids | |||||
| Apigenin | 1 (0.2) | 10.9 [10.1–12.4] | 0 | 11.2 [10.0–12.7] | 0.26 |
| Catechin | 112 (41) | 12.0 [5.6–18.2] | 215 (41) | 12.2 [5.6–16.9] | 0.61 |
| Daidzein | 0 | 7.9 [5.2–17.5] | 2 (0.4) | 8.0 [5.6–16.9] | 0.61 |
| Epicatechin | 132 (48) | 11.4 [5.6–15.4] | 292 (55) | 5.6 [5.6–15.0] | 0.11 |
| Epigallocatechin3 | 252 (91) | — | 496 (94) | — | — |
| Equol | 41 (15) | 0.4 [0.2–0.7] | 58 (11) | 0.4 [0.2–0.7] | 0.61 |
| Gallocatechin3 | 271 (99) | — | 523 (99) | — | — |
| Genistein | 0 | 4.3 [2.0–11.4] | 3 (1.1) | 4.1 [2.2–10.3] | 0.97 |
| Hesperetin | 68 (25) | 2.3 [1.1–19.3] | 142 (27) | 2.2 [1.1–15.2] | 0.67 |
| Kaempferol | 0 | 84.0 [73.0–97.0] | 0 | 84.0 [74.0–94.5] | 0.91 |
| Naringenin | 8 (1.6) | 3.1 [1.3–11.9] | 6 (2.2) | 3.4 [1.6–9.4] | 0.84 |
| Phloretin | 179 (65) | 1.1 [1.1–2.6] | 334 (63) | 1.1 [1.1–2.8] | 0.59 |
| Quercetin | 0 | 142.0 [123.0–161.0] | 0 | 142.0 [123.0–165.0] | 0.61 |
| Phenolic acids | |||||
| 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 2 (0.4) | 17.3 [10.8–30.9] | 2 (0.7) | 16.7 [10.9–26.3] | 0.53 |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0 | 348.0 [313.0–399.0] | 0 | 346.0 [314.5–392.5] | 0.71 |
| 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 3 (0.6) | 21.2 [12.3–40.7] | 1 (0.4) | 19.1 [11.6–41.3] | 0.70 |
| 3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 17 (3.3) | 53.0 [20.8–101.8] | 35 (13) | 56.5 [21.5–108.3] | 0.67 |
| 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 3 (0.6) | 249.0 [178.0–341.0] | 27 (10) | 233.5 [182.0–306.0] | 0.22 |
| 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid | 1 (0.2) | 21.8 [16.8–28.4] | 2 (0.4) | 21.9 [16.9–28.0] | 0.75 |
| 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid | 13 (2.5) | 18.0 [14.3–26.4] | 17 (6.2) | 19.3 [14.6–30.4] | 0.053 |
| 3,5-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid | 2 (0.4) | 27.1 [17.0–48.8] | 7 (2.6) | 26.5 [17.0–53.5] | 0.73 |
| Caffeic acid | 0 | 131.0 [116.0–151.0] | 0 | 135.0 [118.0–157.0] | 0.054 |
| m-Coumaric acid | 40 (15) | 5.7 [2.6–10.9] | 77 (15) | 5.0 [2.1–12.2] | 0.63 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 0 | 25.4 [21.2–31.1] | 1 (0.4) | 25.6 [21.5–31.5] | 0.50 |
| Ferulic acid | 0 | 104.0 [71.0–183.0] | 0 | 110.5 [71.0–206.5] | 0.38 |
| Gallic acid | 16 (3.1) | 16.2 [13.7–20.3] | 26 (9.5) | 16.1 [13.6–19.9] | 0.76 |
| Gallic acid ethyl ester3 | 235 (85) | — | 415 (79) | — | — |
| Homovanillic acid | 0 | 82.0 [65.0–106.0] | 1 (0.4) | 79.0 [64.0–106.0] | 0.59 |
| Isorhamnetin | 4 (0.8) | 65.0 [57.0–76.0] | 1 (0.4) | 66.0 [57.0–76.0] | 0.77 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 0 | 232.0 [215.0–255.0] | 2 (0.7) | 230.5 [214.0–257.0] | 0.88 |
| Vanillic acid | 0 | 197.0 [178.0–225.0] | 2 (0.4) | 195.0 [176.0–230.0] | 0.97 |
| Stilbenes | |||||
| Resveratrol | 106 (38) | 2.5 [1.1–3.9] | 199 (38) | 2.5 [1.1–3.8) | 0.91 |
| Lignans | |||||
| Enterodiol | 62 (23) | 1.0 [0.5–2.0] | 110 (21) | 1.0 [0.5–2.1] | 0.55 |
| Enterolactone | 4 (0.8) | 8.6 [3.7–15.4] | 5 (1.8) | 8.3 [3.8–15.8] | 0.98 |
| Tyrosols | |||||
| Hydroxytyrosol | 117 (42) | 12.0 [5.6–15.2] | 222 (42) | 12.2 [5.6–15.5] | 0.37 |
| Tyrosol | 0 | 3.5 [2.7–5.1] | 3 (1.1) | 3.7 [2.7–5.3] | 0.25 |
LOQ, limit of quantification.
From Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests.
LOQ = 11.1 nmol/L for epigallocatechin and gallocatechin; LOQ = 1.11 nmol/L for gallic acid ethyl ester.
Statistical analyses
Medians [IQRs] of blood polyphenol concentrations of cases and controls were calculated and compared using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the correlations among blood polyphenol concentrations in the controls. Means ± SDs, medians [IQRs], or frequencies (where appropriate) of baseline characteristics were computed and compared between cases and controls. Baseline characteristic differences between cases and controls were tested by conditional logistic regression.
According to our power analysis calculations, a total of 273 cases and matched controls (1:2) will allow us to detect an exposure–disease association with a β = 0.80 for an OR of 0.6 for the highest compared with lowest quartiles of exposure in the control population, assuming α = 0.05 (21). The estimated disease prevalence is 0.2% (12).
Multivariable conditional logistic regression, stratified by case–control set, was used to compute ORs and the corresponding 95% CIs for the associations between blood polyphenol concentrations and differentiated TC risk. The quality of the models was checked using graphical methods and a goodness-of-fit test. Blood polyphenol concentrations were categorized into quartiles based on the distribution of blood concentrations in controls. Tests for linear trend were performed by assigning the medians of each quartile as scores and entering this variable as a continuous term in the logistic regression models. Blood polyphenol concentrations were also analyzed as continuous variables, after log2 transformation. ORlog2 estimates can be interpreted as the RR associated with a doubling in the blood polyphenol concentration. Possible nonlinear associations were tested using restricted cubic spline models. The basic model was conditioned on matching factors only, whereas the multivariable model was further adjusted for BMI, alcohol consumption (g/d), and age of menarche (y). Other lifestyle, anthropometric, and reproductive variables such as smoking status (never, current, former, unknown), physical activity using the Cambridge index (inactive and moderately inactive, moderately active and active, unknown) (22), education level (none, primary, technical/professional, secondary, higher education, unknown), menopausal status [premenopausal, postmenopausal, perimenopausal, surgical postmenopausal (bilateral oophorectomy)], parity (no, yes, unknown), number of full-term pregnancies (nulliparous, 1, 2, 3, ≥4, unknown), breastfeeding (no, yes, unknown), ever oral contraceptives use (no, yes, unknown), ever hormonal replacement therapy use (no, yes, unknown), and prevalent diabetes (no, yes, unknown) were evaluated as potential confounders, but were not included in the final model because they were not different (P value > 0.1) between cases and controls in the logistic regressions conditional on matching variables. Missing values were retained by creating a separate category (unknown) for categorical variables.
Similar conditional logistic regression models were conducted for polyphenols (caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid) which were significantly associated with differentiated TC risk by tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (low: T1–T2 compared with high: T3–T4) and histological type (papillary compared with follicular), and heterogeneity by subgroups was tested using the Wald test assessed with the SAS macro %subtype (23). Moreover, modification of the ORs by age at blood collection (<48, 48–55, >55 y), education level (primary or lower compared with secondary or higher), smoking status (never compared with ever), physical activity (inactive or moderately inactive compared with moderately active or active), BMI (<25 compared with ≥25), menopausal status (premenopausal, perimenopausal, postmenopausal), alcohol consumption (≤5 g/d compared with >5 g/d), time to diagnosis (<4, 4–7, >7 y), and countries (high compared with low incidence for differentiated TC) was evaluated using a likelihood ratio test. EPIC countries with TC incidence rates per year of >1 in 10,000 in women (i.e., France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Spain) were considered to have high TC incidence, whereas the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway were considered to have low TC incidence.
To account for multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was applied, giving a stricter P value threshold for statistical significance at 0.0015, based on the 33 polyphenols analyzed (P value < 0.05/33 = 0.0015). Blood polyphenol concentrations associated with differentiated TC risk at P values between <0.05 and 0.0015 were selected as candidates for independent validation studies. All analyses were performed using SAS Software version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc.).
Results
The current study included 273 incident differentiated TC cases (210 papillary, 45 follicular, and 18 not otherwise specified TC tumors) and 512 matched controls after a median follow-up time of 12.6 y (Supplemental Figure 1). All cases and controls were women with a mean age at blood collection of 50 y. At baseline, controls tended to have a lower BMI and to consume more alcohol than cases (Table 2). Moreover, controls were more likely to have experienced menarche at an older age than cases, although the difference was not significant. The rest of the baseline characteristics were comparable in cases and controls.
TABLE 2.
Baseline characteristics among differentiated thyroid cancer cases and controls1
| Characteristic | Cases (n = 273) | Controls (n = 512) | P value2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at blood collection, y | 50.0 ± 8.6 | 50.0 ± 8.7 | Matched |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.4 ± 4.7 | 25.6 ± 4.6 | 0.007 |
| Alcohol intake, g/d | 1.4 [0.1–8.1] | 2.6 [0.2–11.2] | 0.019 |
| Coffee intake, g/d | 120 [41–296] | 129 [60–300] | 0.82 |
| Age at menarche, y | 12.7 ± 1.5 | 12.9 ± 1.5 | 0.069 |
| Physical activity | 0.14 | ||
| Inactive or moderately inactive | 192 (70.3) | 341 (66.6) | |
| Moderately active or active | 80 (29.3) | 167 (32.6) | |
| Smoking status | 0.77 | ||
| Never | 162 (59.3) | 311 (60.7) | |
| Former | 53 (19.4) | 98 (19.1) | |
| Smoker | 53 (19.4) | 99 (19.3) | |
| Highest educational level | 0.26 | ||
| None | 28 (10.3) | 46 (9.0) | |
| Primary school completed | 98 (35.9) | 180 (35.2) | |
| Technical/professional school | 54 (19.8) | 86 (16.8) | |
| Secondary school | 38 (13.9) | 92 (18.0) | |
| Longer education | 49 (18.0) | 103 (20.1) | |
| Menopausal status | 0.47 | ||
| Premenopausal | 128 (46.9) | 242 (47.3) | |
| Postmenopausal | 100 (36.6) | 194 (37.9) | |
| Perimenopausal | 35 (12.8) | 64 (12.5) | |
| Surgical postmenopause | 10 (3.7) | 12 (2.3) | |
| Full-term pregnancies | 239 (88.5) | 440 (86.4) | 0.48 |
| Full-term pregnancies, n | 0.84 | ||
| 0 | 31 (11.5) | 69 (13.6) | |
| 1 | 46 (17.1) | 85 (16.8) | |
| 2 | 122 (45.4) | 214 (42.2) | |
| 3 | 48 (17.8) | 96 (18.9) | |
| ≥4 | 22 (8.2) | 43 (8.5) | |
| Breastfeeding | 191 (71.3) | 377 (74.8) | 0.25 |
| Ever use of OCs | 127 (46.5) | 242 (47.3) | 0.62 |
| Ever use of HRT | 34 (12.8) | 69 (13.9) | 0.71 |
| Fasting status | Matched | ||
| <3 h | 105 (38.5) | 187 (36.5) | |
| 3–6 h | 41 (15.0) | 82 (16.0) | |
| >6 h | 125 (45.8) | 240 (46.9) | |
| Prevalent diabetes | 10 (2.1) | 5 (1.9) | 1.00 |
Values are means ± SDs, medians [IQRs], or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. Numbers may not sum to totals owing to missing values. HRT, hormone replacement therapy; OC, oral contraceptive.
From logistic regression conditional on matching variables.
Thirty-six polyphenols were measured in blood samples from cases and controls. Three of them (epigallocatechin, gallocatechin, and gallic acid ethyl ester) were excluded from the association analyses because >75% of samples were below the LOQ (Table 1). Most polyphenols showed similar blood concentrations in cases and controls, except caffeic acid was found in slightly lower concentrations in differentiated TC cases than in controls (Table 1). Moderate correlations were observed between caffeic and ferulic acids (mainly originating from coffee intake) (24) and coffee intake (r = 0.39 and r = 0.50, respectively) and between 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (a metabolite of caffeic acid formed in the gut) and coffee intake (r = 0.38).
Several strong correlations were observed between polyphenol concentrations in blood, such as between 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (r = 0.85), genistein and daidzein (r = 0.77), naringenin and hesperetin (r = 0.72), caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (r = 0.64), and caffeic acid and ferulic acid (r = 0.68), reflecting co-occurrence in their main food sources or biotransformation (Supplemental Table 1).
In the multivariable models, blood concentrations of caffeic acid (ORlog2: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.93) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (ORlog2: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.99) were inversely associated with differentiated TC risk (Table 3), although they did not reach the Bonferroni threshold. In the restricted cubic spline model, no evidence of nonlinearity was observed for the relations between both caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid and differentiated TC risk (data not shown). All other polyphenol concentrations were not related to differentiated TC risk.
TABLE 3.
ORs and 95% CIs of differentiated thyroid cancer for log2-transformed polyphenol concentrations1
| Basic model2 | Multivariable model3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols, nmol/L | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value |
| Flavonoids | ||||
| Apigenin | 0.84 (0.59, 1.20) | 0.34 | 0.83 (0.58, 1.19) | 0.32 |
| Catechin | 1.06 (0.90, 1.26) | 0.47 | 1.13 (0.95, 1.35) | 0.17 |
| Daidzein | 0.96 (0.85, 1.09) | 0.56 | 0.96 (0.84, 1.09) | 0.54 |
| Epicatechin | 1.11 (0.93, 1.33) | 0.27 | 1.13 (0.95, 1.36) | 0.17 |
| Epigallocatechin | — | — | — | — |
| Equol | 0.95 (0.85, 1.05) | 0.29 | 0.95 (0.85, 1.05) | 0.32 |
| Gallocatechin | — | — | — | — |
| Genistein | 1.01 (0.91, 1.11) | 0.92 | 1.00 (0.91, 1.10) | 0.98 |
| Hesperetin | 1.03 (0.96, 1.09) | 0.43 | 1.02 (0.95, 1.08) | 0.62 |
| Kaempferol | 1.07 (0.57, 1.98) | 0.84 | 1.05 (0.56, 1.96) | 0.89 |
| Naringenin | 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) | 0.59 | 1.01 (0.94, 1.10) | 0.71 |
| Phloretin | 0.96 (0.82, 1.11) | 0.56 | 0.94 (0.81, 1.09) | 0.41 |
| Quercetin | 0.73 (0.40, 1.35) | 0.32 | 0.81 (0.44, 1.51) | 0.51 |
| Phenolic acids | ||||
| 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 1.05 (0.90, 1.23) | 0.55 | 1.08 (0.92, 1.27) | 0.34 |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 1.24 (0.66, 2.34) | 0.50 | 1.25 (0.65, 2.37) | 0.50 |
| 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) | 0.87 | 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) | 0.88 |
| 3-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 0.99 (0.91, 1.09) | 0.91 | 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) | 0.85 |
| 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 1.08 (0.86, 1.36) | 0.49 | 1.08 (0.86, 1.36) | 0.52 |
| 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic acid | 0.82 (0.60, 1.10) | 0.19 | 0.83 (0.61, 1.14) | 0.25 |
| 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid | 0.84 (0.71, 0.99) | 0.032 | 0.84 (0.71, 0.99) | 0.039 |
| 3,5-Dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid | 0.99 (0.85, 1.17) | 0.94 | 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) | 0.96 |
| Caffeic acid | 0.52 (0.31, 0.86) | 0.011 | 0.55 (0.33, 0.93) | 0.025 |
| m-Coumaric acid | 1.01 (0.93, 1.09) | 0.89 | 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) | 0.76 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 0.88 (0.62, 1.26) | 0.49 | 0.93 (0.64, 1.34) | 0.68 |
| Ferulic acid | 0.82 (0.64, 1.04) | 0.10 | 0.82 (0.64, 1.04) | 0.10 |
| Gallic acid | 0.98 (0.73, 1.32) | 0.91 | 1.06 (0.79, 1.43) | 0.71 |
| Gallic acid ethyl ester | — | — | — | — |
| Homovanillic acid | 1.02 (0.76, 1.38) | 0.88 | 1.07 (0.79, 1.45) | 0.67 |
| Isorhamnetin | 0.76 (0.37, 1.57) | 0.47 | 0.71 (0.34, 1.47) | 0.36 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 0.69 (0.20, 2.40) | 0.56 | 0.76 (0.22, 2.66) | 0.66 |
| Vanillic acid | 1.05 (0.72, 1.53) | 0.81 | 1.02 (0.70, 1.50) | 0.90 |
| Stilbenes | ||||
| Resveratrol | 0.98 (0.86, 1.11) | 0.74 | 1.03 (0.90, 1.19) | 0.63 |
| Lignans | ||||
| Enterodiol | 0.98 (0.90, 1.08) | 0.71 | 1.00 (0.91, 1.09) | 0.93 |
| Enterolactone | 0.98 (0.89, 1.06) | 0.57 | 0.99 (0.91, 1.09) | 0.87 |
| Tyrosols | ||||
| Hydroxytyrosol | 0.85 (0.67, 1.08) | 0.19 | 0.90 (0.70, 1.14) | 0.37 |
| Tyrosol | 0.88 (0.71, 1.09) | 0.24 | 0.92 (0.74, 1.14) | 0.44 |
No associations exceeded the Bonferroni threshold (P < 0.05/33) = 0.0015.
From conditional logistic regressions, conditioned on matching factors only (basic model).
From multivariable conditional logistic regressions, conditioned on matching factors with additional adjustment for BMI, alcohol consumption, and age of menarche.
In the results divided by TC histological subtype, inverse associations were observed between blood concentrations of caffeic acid (ORlog2: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.68; P-heterogeneity = 0.048), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (ORlog2: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.90; P-heterogeneity = 0.030) (Table 4), and ferulic acid (ORlog2: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.91; P-heterogeneity = 0.062) and papillary TC tumors; but no associations were detected with follicular TC tumors. None of the other blood polyphenols were associated with either papillary or follicular TC tumors (data not shown). In the subgroup analyses, an inverse association was observed with blood concentrations of caffeic and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acids in countries with low TC incidence, but not in countries with high TC incidence (P-heterogeneity < 0.05). However, none of these results reached the Bonferroni threshold (P = 0.0015). Similar inverse associations were observed for the relation between either caffeic acid or 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid and differentiated TC risk across strata of age at blood collection, education level, smoking status, physical activity, BMI, menopausal status, alcohol intake, and years between blood draw and diagnosis, denoting no effect modification (Table 4).
TABLE 4.
ORs and 95% CIs of differentiated thyroid cancer for log2-transformed caffeic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid blood concentrations stratified by selected variables1
| Caffeic acid | 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases, n | Controls, n | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Histological type | ||||||
| Papillary | 210 | 396 | 0.36 (0.19, 0.69) | 0.0482 | 0.74 (0.61, 0.90) | 0.0302 |
| Follicular | 45 | 82 | 1.52 (0.52, 4.49) | 1.26 (0.79, 2.01) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||||
| Low: T1–T2 | 118 | 218 | 0.54 (0.26, 1.10) | 0.152 | 0.73 (0.57, 0.95) | 0.0402 |
| High: T3–T4 | 29 | 56 | 2.16 (0.46, 10.00) | 1.44 (0.90, 2.30) | ||
| Thyroid cancer incidence | ||||||
| High-incidence countries3 | 219 | 415 | 0.86 (0.48, 1.56) | 0.0104 | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.0404 |
| Low-incidence countries5 | 54 | 97 | 0.15 (0.04, 0.54) | 0.55 (0.34, 0.89) | ||
| Age at blood collection, y | ||||||
| <48 | 114 | 211 | 0.43 (0.16, 1.18) | 0.574 | 0.78 (0.58, 1.06) | 0.754 |
| 48–55 | 75 | 135 | 0.45 (0.13, 1.57) | 0.84 (0.59, 1.20) | ||
| >55 | 84 | 166 | 0.64 (0.31, 1.33) | 0.90 (0.69, 1.18) | ||
| Education | ||||||
| Primary or less | 126 | 226 | 0.39 (0.14, 1.14) | 0.344 | 0.82 (0.62, 1.10) | 0.984 |
| Secondary or more | 147 | 286 | 0.59 (0.27, 1.31) | 0.86 (0.64, 1.17) | ||
| Smoking | ||||||
| Never | 162 | 311 | 0.60 (0.24, 1.50) | 0.454 | 0.79 (0.60, 1.04) | 0.994 |
| Ever | 106 | 197 | 0.48 (0.17, 1.32) | 1.04 (0.74, 1.47) | ||
| Physical activity | ||||||
| Inactive or moderately inactive | 192 | 341 | 0.40 (0.18, 0.89) | 0.874 | 0.71 (0.56, 0.91) | 0.314 |
| Moderately active or active | 80 | 167 | 0.19 (0.03, 1.12) | 0.72 (0.41, 1.25) | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||
| <25 | 119 | 264 | 0.56 (0.24, 1.31) | 0.284 | 1.02 (0.78, 1.33) | 0.544 |
| ≥25 | 154 | 248 | 0.56 (0.24, 1.34) | 0.89 (0.69, 1.16) | ||
| Menopausal status at blood collection | ||||||
| Premenopausal | 128 | 242 | 0.31 (0.13, 0.78) | 0.194 | 0.78 (0.58, 1.04) | 0.604 |
| Perimenopausal | 35 | 64 | 1.33 (0.16, 10.76) | 0.84 (0.52, 1.37) | ||
| Postmenopausal (natural and surgical) | 110 | 206 | 0.69 (0.35, 1.34) | 0.92 (0.72, 1.16) | ||
| Alcohol intake, g/d | ||||||
| ≤5 | 176 | 300 | 0.90 (0.40, 2.03) | 0.234 | 0.89 (0.70, 1.13) | 0.614 |
| >5 | 96 | 212 | 0.42 (0.15, 1.12) | 0.83 (0.59, 1.16) | ||
| Years between blood draw and diagnosis | ||||||
| <4 | 49 | 86 | 1.14 (0.40, 3.31) | 0.292 | 1.02 (0.69, 1.53) | 0.174 |
| 4–7 | 56 | 108 | 0.38 (0.10, 1.43) | 1.01 (0.71, 1.43) | ||
| >7 | 168 | 318 | 0.45 (0.23, 0.89) | 0.73 (0.58, 0.91) | ||
TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
P-heterogeneity based on the Wald test.
High-incidence countries for differentiated thyroid cancer: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Spain.
P-interaction based on the likelihood ratio test.
Low-incidence countries for differentiated thyroid cancer: United Kingdom, Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway.
Discussion
In the current prospective nested case–control study, inverse trends were observed between blood concentrations of both caffeic acid and its dehydrogenated metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid (also called dihydrocaffeic acid), and total differentiated TC risk, but they did not reach the Bonferroni threshold for statistically significant associations when corrected for multiple comparisons. The remaining blood polyphenol concentrations were not associated with total differentiated TC risk. Interestingly, the 2 inverse associations were restricted to papillary TC and were more striking in countries with low incidence of TC. For 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid, the negative association was also stronger in stage T1–T2 than in stage T3–T4 carcinomas. Papillary TC and low-stage thyroid tumors are more likely to be related to overdiagnosis than are high-stage TCs in countries with high incidence. However, overdiagnosis is not related with these TC tumor types in countries with low incidence (3).
To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the relations between blood polyphenol concentrations and TC risk. Although no results were statistically significant after Bonferroni correction, concentrations of caffeic, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic, and ferulic acids might be inversely associated with papillary TC risk, but not with follicular TC risk. Caffeic and ferulic acids are abundant in human diets, and are mostly present in an esterified form as chlorogenic and feruloylquinic acids (esters of caffeic or ferulic acids and quinic acid) (25). They contribute 78% and 19% of total hydroxycinnamic acid intake (mean intake in Europe = 541.2 mg/d) (26). Caffeic acid in blood mainly originates from the hydrolysis of chlorogenic acid by the gut microbiota and from the absorption in the gut of the free form of caffeic acid (27). Ferulic acid in blood results from both the hydrolysis of feruloylquinic acid and the O-methylation of caffeic acid in the liver. Dihydrocaffeic acid is only present in the diet in very low amounts (26). Dihydrocaffeic acid in blood is mainly formed by microbial hydrogenation of caffeic acid in the gut (27). All 3 compounds in both blood, in the current study, and urine, in a previous analysis including 475 subjects from the EPIC study (24), showed moderate-to-high correlations with coffee intake and poor or no correlations with any other tested food groups, except for ferulic acid and cereals (24). Indeed, a urinary metabolite of caffeic acid (caffeic acid sulfate) was correlated to whole-grain rye intake (r = 0.58) in a free-living Swedish population (28), whereas urinary ferulic concentrations were increased after an intervention with rye bran bread in humans (29) and with rye bran in mice (30). Unfortunately, data on coffee consumption were not available in these analyses, so the potential confounding effect of coffee on whole-grain cereal was not measured.
In 3 previous EPIC studies, intakes of phenolic acids (mainly hydroxycinnamic acids) (12), coffee (31), or total fiber (32) were not related to the risk of either overall TC or its histological subtypes (papillary and follicular tumors). Moreover, no differences in coffee consumption between differentiated TC cases and controls were observed in our study (Table 2). Furthermore, the consumption of either whole-grain cereals or total grains was not associated with TC risk in a series of hospital-based case–control studies (33) or in a meta-analysis (34). Differences between results obtained with the measurement of intake, and those obtained here with biomarkers might be explained by a more limited accuracy of exposure measurements when relying on intake data rather than biomarker data (9, 13). In fact, it is difficult to accurately estimate polyphenol intake via dietary questionnaires owing to the variability of polyphenol content within the same or similar foods, such as the heterogeneity of polyphenol composition in the different coffee types according to brewing methods (espresso compared with diluted coffee) and cultivars (arabica compared with robusta) (35, 36). Thus, dietary biomarkers should be more accurate and objective measurements than dietary questionnaires, accounting for interindividual variability in phenolic acid bioavailability (14).
Although the associations were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction, they were biologically plausible. The underlying potential mechanisms of action of caffeic, ferulic, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acids in thyroid carcinogenesis could be directly associated with their anticarcinogenic properties (37). In particular, ferulic acid has been shown to modulate cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, invasion, migration, and colony formation on TT medullary TC cells (38). Moreover, they have been indirectly associated with antidiabetic, antiobesity, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties (9). It is important to bear in mind that obesity (5), type 2 diabetes (39), and inflammation (17) are potential risk factors for TC. Plasma concentrations of total and several individual polyphenols (i.e., daidzein, 3,5-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and hydroxytyrosol) were inversely associated with concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in a previous cross-sectional analysis in an EPIC subsample (40), suggesting that these polyphenols may protect against harmful health effects related to inflammation. Moreover, plasma and urinary concentrations of caffeic acid and other coffee polyphenols were associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in 2 cohorts (41, 42). Indeed, caffeic and dihydrocaffeic acids inhibit amyloid formation of human islet amyloid polypeptide in vitro (43), and decrease glucose uptake and the detrimental effects of high glucose concentrations in endothelial cells (44). In addition, caffeic and ferulic acids modulate the activity of several transcriptional regulatory factors (e.g., AMP-activated protein kinase, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ, and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-γ co-activator-1α) and enzymatic pathways (e.g., fatty acid synthase, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase, and acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase) to control obesity (45).
Caffeic, ferulic, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acids are compounds of food origin, but they also come from catabolism by the microbiota (27). Polyphenols can modulate the gut microbiota toward a more healthy composition (46). Indeed, dietary chlorogenic acid supplementation improves gut health in weaned piglets (47). Dysbiosis, an alteration of the gut microbiota, is associated with intestinal and extraintestinal diseases, including cancer and metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes (48, 49). Both TC and thyroid nodules were associated with the composition of the gut microbiome in 2 observational studies in Chinese populations (50, 51).
Major strengths of this study are its prospective design, its long follow-up, its relatively large size for a TC study, and the coverage of several European countries with a wide heterogeneity in polyphenol exposure. Moreover, the direct analysis of 36 polyphenols in blood provides a valid measurement of the endogenous exposure. However, several limitations of this study also warrant mention. 1) Half-lives of polyphenols are short to moderate, suggesting that a single measurement of these biomarkers is more likely to reflect relatively short-term concentrations, except for polyphenols regularly consumed that tend to maintain relatively similar concentrations in blood during the entire day. The 3 phenolic acids inversely associated with TC risk in the present work mainly originate from coffee, a beverage most often consumed on a daily basis. 2) Fasting status affects blood concentrations of polyphenols, particularly polyphenols coming from food and quickly absorbed. However, TC cases were matched with controls by fasting status and time of blood collection to minimize this limitation. 3) We measured blood polyphenols only once for each individual, so we cannot account for intraindividual variability and changes in the exposure along the study follow-up. This issue could be particularly relevant for a few polyphenols, because they have a relatively poor intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.3–0.4), but not for others (ICC > 0.5) (http://exposome-explorer.iarc.fr/reproducibilities). Therefore, our results on a few blood flavonoids may have been attenuated by partial misclassification. 4) Information on history of benign thyroid diseases, thyroidectomy among control subjects, and use of drugs that could interfere with thyroid function was not available in the EPIC study. 5) Although we controlled for a wide range of established TC risk factors, the possibility of residual confounding still exists, although the findings were all little affected by adjustment in our study. 6) We cannot exclude the possibility that our findings were due to chance, because they did not reach the Bonferroni threshold. However, it is often considered to be overly conservative and might have overcorrected the model. Moreover, the findings were similar in both the general and subgroup analyses (except for the risk of follicular TC and high TNM stage differentiated TC) and are biologically plausible. 7) Generalization of the results should be done cautiously, because our study only analyzed European women and other populations may show different genetic backgrounds (e.g., non-European ancestry) and microbiota composition with possible consequences for phenolic acid bioavailability.
In summary, this prospective investigation conducted in a relatively large nested case–control study in women within the EPIC, a European multicountry cohort, shows that blood polyphenol concentrations are mostly not associated with TC risk. However, our study raises the possibility that high blood concentrations of caffeic, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic, and ferulic acids may be related to a lower risk of papillary TC. These 3 compounds are, therefore, interesting candidates for validation in independent studies on papillary TC.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Mr. Bertrand Hémon for his valuable help with the EPIC database. We thank the CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support.
The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—RZ-R: designed the research and drafted the manuscript; D Achaintre: performed the laboratory analysis; LL-B: performed the statistical analysis; SF, AS, SR, and AA: had primary responsibility for the final content; SF, CK, KO, A Tjønneland, TT, LL, M-CB-R, VK, TSJ, MBS, A Trichopoulou, EP, CLV, GM, VP, SP, RT, FR, GS, JRQ, MR-B, PA, M-DC, EA, MA, JH, RV, NJW, TYNT, D Aune, GB, EW, AS, SR, and AA: contributed to the design of the study, data collection, and quality control and analysis; and all authors: read, critically reviewed, and approved the final manuscript. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Notes
Supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) “Miguel Servet” program grant CP15/00100 (cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund) (to RZ-R). The coordination of EPIC (the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) is financially supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by Danish Cancer Society (Denmark); Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale, and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (Netherlands), and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands); Health Research Fund (FIS)—ISCIII, the Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia, and Navarra, and the Catalan Institute of Oncology—ICO (Spain); Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council, and the County Councils of Skåne and Västerbotten (Sweden); Cancer Research UK grant 14136 to EPIC-Norfolk and grants C570/A16491 and C8221/A19170 to EPIC-Oxford, and Medical Research Council grant 1000143 to EPIC-Norfolk and grant MR/M012190/1 to EPIC-Oxford (United Kingdom).
Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer / World Health Organization.
Supplemental Figure 1 and Supplemental Table 1 are available from the “Supplementary data” link in the online posting of the article and from the same link in the online table of contents at https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/.
For information on how to submit an application for gaining access to EPIC data and/or biospecimens, please follow the instructions at http://epic.iarc.fr/access/index.php.
Abbreviations used: EPIC, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; ICC, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer; LOQ, limit of quantification; TC, thyroid cancer; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
Contributor Information
Raul Zamora-Ros, Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Leila Lujan-Barroso, Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
David Achaintre, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Silvia Franceschi, Oncology Referral Center (CRO), Aviano National Cancer Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy.
Cecilie Kyrø, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kim Overvad, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne Tjønneland, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Therese Truong, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University (UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Lucie Lecuyer, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University (UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University (UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Verena Katzke, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Theron S Johnson, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias B Schulze, Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany; Institute of Nutritional Sciences, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany.
Antonia Trichopoulou, Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Eleni Peppa, Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Carlo La Vechia, Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna Masala, Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network—ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Valeria Pala, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore Panico, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Rosario Tumino, Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, “Civic—MP Arezzo” Hospital, ASP Ragusa, Ragusa, Italy.
Fulvio Ricceri, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy.
Guri Skeie, Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
J Ramón Quirós, Public Health Directorate, Asturias, Spain.
Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Pilar Amiano, CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
María-Dolores Chirlaque, CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB)-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Eva Ardanaz, CIBER in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Martin Almquist, Department of Surgery, Endocrine-Sarcoma Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Joakim Hennings, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Roel Vermeulen, Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Public Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nicholas J Wareham, Medical Research Council (MRC) Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tammy Y N Tong, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dagfinn Aune, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway; Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Graham Byrnes, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Elisabete Weiderpass, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Augustin Scalbert, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Sabina Rinaldi, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France.
Antonio Agudo, Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
References
- 1. Dal Maso L, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S. Risk factors for thyroid cancer: an epidemiological review focused on nutritional factors. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:75–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal ML. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:614–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pellegriti G, Frasca F, Regalbuto C, Squatrito S, Vigneri R. Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology and risk factors. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013:965212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kitahara CM, McCullough ML, Franceschi S, Rinaldi S, Wolk A, Neta G, Olov AH, Anderson K, Andreotti G, Beane Freeman LE et al. Anthropometric factors and thyroid cancer risk by histological subtype: pooled analysis of 22 prospective studies. Thyroid. 2016;26:306–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pérez-Jiménez J, Neveu V, Vos F, Scalbert A. Systematic analysis of the content of 502 polyphenols in 452 foods and beverages: an application of the Phenol-Explorer database. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:4959–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Remesy C. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(1 Suppl):230S–42S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Williamson G. The role of polyphenols in modern nutrition. Nutr Bull. 2017;42:226–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zamora-Ros R, Touillaud M, Rothwell JA, Romieu I, Scalbert A. Measuring exposure to the polyphenol metabolome in observational epidemiologic studies: current tools and applications and their limits. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:11–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shin H-J, Hwang K-A, Choi K-C. Antitumor effect of various phytochemicals on diverse types of thyroid cancers. Nutrients. 2019;11:125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Xiao Q, Park Y, Hollenbeck AR, Kitahara CM. Dietary flavonoid intake and thyroid cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1102–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zamora-Ros R, Cayssials V, Franceschi S, Kyrø C, Weiderpass E, Hennings J, Sandström M, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K et al. Polyphenol intake and differentiated thyroid cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:1841–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zamora-Ros R, Rabassa M, Llorach R, Gonzalez CA, Andres-Lacueva C. Application of dietary phenolic biomarkers in epidemiology: past, present, and future. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:6648–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bento-Silva AK, Koistinen VM, Mena P, Bronze MR, Hanhineva K, Sahlstrøm S, Kitrytė V, Moco S, Aura AM. Factors affecting intake, metabolism and health benefits of phenolic acids: do we understand individual variability?. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59:1275–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Riboli E, Kaaks R. The EPIC project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(Suppl 1):6S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Unwin I, Southgate DA, Vignat J, Skeie G, Salvini S, Parpinel M, Moller A, Ireland J et al. The EPIC nutrient database project (ENDB): a first attempt to standardize nutrient databases across the 10 European countries participating in the EPIC study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:1037–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dossus L, Franceschi S, Biessy C, Navionis AS, Travis RC, Weiderpass E, Scalbert A, Romieu I, Tjønneland A, Olsen A et al. Adipokines and inflammation markers and risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the EPIC study. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:1332–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Urpi-Sarda M, Zamora-Ros R, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Cherubini A, Jauregui O, de la Torre R, Covas M, Estruch R, Jaeger W, Andres-Lacueva C. HPLC-tandem mass spectrometric method to characterize resveratrol metabolism in humans. Clin Chem. 2007;53:292–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Magiera S, Baranowska I, Kusa J. Development and validation of UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS method for the determination of selected cardiovascular drugs, polyphenols and their metabolites in human urine. Talanta. 2012;89:47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Achaintre D, Gicquiau A, Li L, Rinaldi S, Scalbert A. Quantification of 38 dietary polyphenols in plasma by differential isotope labelling and liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1558:50–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Murphy N, Achaintre D, Zamora-Ros R, Jenab M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Carbonnel F, Savoye I, Kaaks R, Kühn T, Boeing H et al. A prospective evaluation of plasma polyphenol levels and colon cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:1620–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Schuit J, Mitchell J, Hennings S, Day NE. Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:407–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Wang M, Spiegelman D, Kuchiba A, Lochhead P, Kim S, Chan AT, Poole EM, Tamimi R, Tworoger SS, Giovannucci E et al. Statistical methods for studying disease subtype heterogeneity. Statist Med. 2016;35:782–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zamora-Ros R, Achaintre D, Rothwell JA, Rinaldi S, Assi N, Ferrari P, Leitzmann M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Fagherazzi G, Auffret A et al. Urinary excretions of 34 dietary polyphenols and their associations with lifestyle factors in the EPIC cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pérez-Jiménez J, Fezeu L, Touvier M, Arnault N, Manach C, Hercberg S, Galan P, Scalbert A. Dietary intake of 337 polyphenols in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93:1220–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zamora-Ros R, Rothwell JA, Scalbert A, Knaze V, Romieu I, Slimani N, Fagherazzi G, Perquier F, Touillaud M, Molina-Montes E et al. Dietary intakes and food sources of phenolic acids in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Br J Nutr. 2013;110:1500–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gonthier MP, Verny MA, Besson C, Remesy C, Scalbert A. Chlorogenic acid bioavailability largely depends on its metabolism by the gut microflora in rats. J Nutr. 2003;133:1853–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hanhineva K, Brunius C, Andersson A, Marklund M, Juvonen R, Keski-Rahkonen P, Auriola S, Landberg R. Discovery of urinary biomarkers of whole grain rye intake in free-living subjects using nontargeted LC-MS metabolite profiling. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:2315–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Harder H, Tetens I, Let MB, Meyer AS. Rye bran bread intake elevates urinary excretion of ferulic acid in humans, but does not affect the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation ex vivo. Eur J Nutr. 2004;43:230–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pekkinen J, Rosa-Sibakov N, Micard V, Keski-Rahkonen P, Lehtonen M, Poutanen K, Mykkänen H, Hanhineva K. Amino acid-derived betaines dominate as urinary markers for rye bran intake in mice fed high-fat diet—a nontargeted metabolomics study. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:1550–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zamora-Ros R, Alghamdi MA, Cayssials V, Franceschi S, Almquist M, Hennings J, Sandström M, Tsilidis KK, Weiderpass E, Boutron-Ruault M-C et al. Coffee and tea drinking in relation to the risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58:3303–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zamora-Ros R, Rinaldi S, Tsilidis KK, Weiderpass E, Boutron-Ruault M-C, Rostgaard-Hansen AL, Tjønneland A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Mesrine S, Katzke V et al. Energy and macronutrient intake and risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:65–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Liu ZT, Lin A-H. Dietary factors and thyroid cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66:1165–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Akslen LA, Nilssen S, Kvale G. Reproductive factors and risk of thyroid cancer. A prospective study of 63,090 women from Norway. Br J Cancer. 1992;65:772–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Parras P, Martínez-Tome M, Jiménez AM, Murcia MA. Antioxidant capacity of coffees of several origins brewed following three different procedures. Food Chem. 2007;102:582–92. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Rothwell JA, Loftfield E, Wedekind R, Freedman N, Kambanis C, Scalbert A, Sinha R. Metabolomic study of the variability of the chemical composition of commonly consumed coffee brews. Metabolites. 2019;9:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rothwell JA, Knaze V, Zamora-Ros R. Polyphenols: dietary assessment and role in the prevention of cancers. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20:512–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dodurga Y, Eroğlu C, Seçme M, Elmas L, Avcı ÇB, Şatıroğlu-Tufan NL. Anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects of ferulic acid in TT medullary thyroid cancer cells interacting with URG4/URGCP. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:1933–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yeo Y, Ma S-H, Hwang Y, Horn-Ross PL, Hsing A, Lee K-E, Park YJ, Park D-J, Yoo K-Y, Park SK. Diabetes mellitus and risk of thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Harms LM, Scalbert A, Zamora-Ros R, Rinaldi S, Jenab M, Murphy N, Achaintre D, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K et al. Plasma polyphenols associated with lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations: a cross-sectional study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Br J Nutr. 2020:123:198–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lee AH, Tan LB, Hiramatsu N, Ishisaka A, Alfonso H, Tanaka A, Uemura N, Fujiwara Y, Takechi R. Plasma concentrations of coffee polyphenols and plasma biomarkers of diabetes risk in healthy Japanese women. Nutr Diabetes. 2016;6:e212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sun Q, Wedick NM, Tworoger SS, Pan A, Townsend MK, Cassidy A, Franke AA, Rimm EB, Hu FB, van Dam RM. Urinary excretion of select dietary polyphenol metabolites is associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in proximate but not remote follow-up in a prospective investigation in 2 cohorts of US women. J Nutr. 2015;145:1280–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cheng B, Liu X, Gong H, Huang L, Chen H, Zhang X, Li C, Yang M, Ma B, Jiao L et al. Coffee components inhibit amyloid formation of human islet amyloid polypeptide in vitro: possible link between coffee consumption and diabetes mellitus. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:13147–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Natarelli L, Ranaldi G, Leoni G, Roselli M, Guantario B, Comitato R, Ambra R, Cimino F, Speciale A, Virgili F et al. Nanomolar caffeic acid decreases glucose uptake and the effects of high glucose in endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Alam MA, Subhan N, Hossain H, Hossain M, Reza HM, Rahman MM, Ullah MO. Hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: a potential class of natural compounds for the management of lipid metabolism and obesity. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016;13:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Roopchand DE, Carmody RN, Kuhn P, Moskal K, Rojas-Silva P, Turnbaugh PJ, Raskin I. Dietary polyphenols promote growth of the gut bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and attenuate high-fat diet–induced metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2015;64:2847–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen D, Yu B, Zheng P, Mao X, Luo Y, Li Y, He J. Dietary chlorogenic acid supplementation affects gut morphology, antioxidant capacity and intestinal selected bacterial populations in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 2018;9:4968–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GD, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, Quraishi MN, Kinross J, Smidt H, Tuohy KM et al. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65:330–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano GAD, Gasbarrini A, Mele MC. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 2019;7:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao C, Xu Q, Liang C, Yang Y, Wang H, Shang Y, Wang Y, Mu X et al. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is associated with thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules and correlated with clinical index of thyroid function. Endocrine. 2019;64:564–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Feng J, Zhao F, Sun J, Lin B, Zhao L, Liu Y, Jin Y, Li S, Li A, Wei Y. Alterations in the gut microbiota and metabolite profiles of thyroid carcinoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:2728–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
