Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an important therapeutic option for morbidly obese patients. Although LSG promotes sufficient weight loss, how LSG changes plasma metabolites remains unclear. We assessed changes in plasma metabolite levels after LSG. We collected plasma samples from 15 morbidly obese Japanese patients before and 3 months after LSG. A total of 48 metabolites were quantified using capillary electrophoresis time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry‐based metabolomic profiling. Branched chain amino acids, several essential amino acids, choline, 2‐hydroxybutyric acid, 2‐oxoisovaleric acid and hypoxanthine were significantly decreased after LSG. Tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites, including citric acid, succinic acid and malic acid, were significantly elevated after LSG. This is the first report to show dynamic alterations in plasma metabolite concentrations, as assessed using capillary electrophoresis time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, in morbidly obese patients after LSG. Our results might show how LSG helps improve obesity, in part through metabolic status changes, and propose novel therapeutic targets to ameliorate obesity.
Keywords: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Metabolites, Obesity
Dynamic alterations in plasma metabolite concentrations in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of obesity has increased to pandemic levels over the past 50 years 1 . Obesity represents one of the most important chronic diseases worldwide, and is associated with adverse health consequences throughout an individual’s life 1 , 2 , 3 . Given its dramatically escalating prevalence, therapeutic interventions are increasingly being considered for treating obesity and its associated metabolic diseases 2 .
In particular, surgical interventions have rapidly gained popularity 4 , 5 . A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis showed surgery substantially reduces long‐term (>10 years) bodyweight 6 . Furthermore, bariatric surgery reduces long‐term mortality 7 . Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), which is a simple procedure and has a lower complication rate than other bariatric operations, results in stable and adequate weight loss, and improves comorbidities in morbidly obese patients 8 , 9 , 10 . In Japan, LSG is the only procedure covered by insurance; thus, it has garnered significant attention. Although a substantial body of evidence shows that LSG is beneficial for reducing bodyweight and ameliorating metabolic disorders, little is known about systemic metabolic changes after LSG. Consequently, the present study aimed to compare plasma metabolite concentrations from before and 3 months after LSG using capillary electrophoresis time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (CE‐TOFMS), which relatively and absolutely evaluates 916 and 110 ionic metabolites, respectively, to evaluate changes in obesity pathogenesis.
METHODS
Study participants
Between May 2019 and October 2019, morbidly obese patients scheduled to undergo LSG at Chibune General Hospital were consequently recruited for this study. All included patients provided oral and written informed consent; the study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Kobe University (No. 180355) and Chibune General Hospital (No. 20190422A), and was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000035635). LSG procedure was carried out following the guidelines of the Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity: patients whose body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 or BMI ≥32 kg/m2 with comorbidities. All patients received a dietary intervention for approximately 6 months before LSG. The definition of remission of diabetes was as follows: fasting plasma glucose <126 mg/dL and glycohemoglobin <6.5% with the absence of treatment.
Plasma metabolite extraction and CE‐TOFMS analysis
Blood samples, taken in a fasting state, were collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt. CE‐TOFMS analysis was carried out using an Agilent capillary electrophoresis system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) by Human Metabolome Technologies 11 . The systems were connected by a fused silica capillary (50 μm i.d. × 80 cm total length) with a commercial electrophoresis buffer as the electrolyte. Spectrometry analysis was carried out over a range from 50 to 1,000 m/z. Peaks were extracted using MasterHands automatic integration software version 2.17.1.11 (Keio University, Yamagata, Japan), and analyzed to determine their m/z, peak area and migration time 12 . The areas of annotated peaks were subsequently normalized based on internal standard levels and sample amounts, and used to calculate absolute metabolite concentrations. The list of metabolites we evaluated is listed online (https://humanmetabolome.com/jp/services/annotation‐en).
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data. Postoperative results were compared with preoperative baseline data using a paired t‐test. The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated to discover a link between two parameters. For all tests, P‐values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Principal coordinate analysis and z‐scores were calculated using JMP version 14 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All other data supporting the study findings are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
RESULTS
Baseline patient characteristics
Baseline patients characteristics, comorbidities, medications and laboratory data before LSG are listed in Table 1. The mean patient age was 52.2 ± 6.5 years, 12 patients were women. The mean BMI before LSG was 40.8 ± 6.6 kg/m2.
Table 1.
Changes in clinical parameters for 15 patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
| Variables | Before LSG | After LSG | P‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 52.2 ± 6.5 | – | |
| Sex (female), n (%) | 12 (80) | – | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 40.8 ± 6.6 | 33.5 ± 6.1 | <0.0001 |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | 10 (67) | 5 (33) | 0.14 |
| Hypertension | 11 (73) | 9 (60) | 0.70 |
| Dyslipidemia | 13 (87) | 12 (80) | >0.99 |
| Sleep apnea syndrome | 4 (27) | 4 (27) | >0.99 |
| Medication, n (%) | |||
| ACE‐I/ARB | 9 (60) | 5 (33) | 0.27 |
| Calcium channel blocker | 7 (47) | 6 (40) | 0.99 |
| Antiplatelet/anticoagulant | 2 (13) | 2 (13) | 0.99 |
| PPI/H2 blocker | 6 (40) | 10 (67) | 0.27 |
| Statin/fibrate | 12 (80) | 5 (33) | 0.025 |
| Insulin analogs | 4 (27) | 1 (7) | 0.33 |
| DPP4 inhibitor | 2 (13) | 0 (0) | 0.48 |
| SGLT2 inhibitor | 7 (47) | 2 (13) | 0.11 |
| GLP‐1 analogs | 3 (20) | 1 (7) | 0.60 |
| Metformin | 6 (40) | 0 (0) | 0.017 |
| α‐Glucosidase inhibitors | 2 (13) | 0 (0) | 0.48 |
| Laboratory data | |||
| Aspartate transaminase (U/L) | 31.5 ± 15.8 | 20.6 ± 4.8 | 0.013 |
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 32.2 ± 14.7 | 19.3 ± 6.0 | 0.0032 |
| γ‐Glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L) | 30.7 ± 17.0 | 19.1 ± 8.9 | 0.011 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) | 192.1 ± 58.6 | 164.7 ± 33.1 | <0.0001 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 214.4 ± 43.7 | 246.3 ± 58.6 | 0.0033 |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) | 14.2 ± 4.2 | 14.4 ± 5.6 | 0.84 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.87 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 119.2 ± 20.4 | 118.7 ± 32.3 | 0.95 |
| Glycohemoglobin (%) | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 6.1 ± 0.9 | 0.021 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 176.9 ± 35.3 | 205.4 ± 45.7 | 0.048 |
| HDL‐C (mg/dL) | 48.8 ± 15.1 | 56.9 ± 15.0 | <0.0001 |
| LDL‐C (mg/dL) | 103.8 ± 33.9 | 127.7 ± 42.7 | 0.056 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 168.1 ± 101.2 | 131.3 ± 73.8 | 0.069 |
| C‐reactive protein (mg/dL) | 1.0 ± 1.9 | 0.44 ± 0.7 | 0.27 |
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data, or n (%). Analysis was carried out using the paired t‐test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
ACE‐I, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4; GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LSG, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; SGLT2, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2.
Changes to body composition and metabolic status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
The mean follow‐up period was 92.1 ± 2.2 days. Changes to body composition and other parameters are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1a,b. BMI (40.8 ± 6.6 kg/m2 vs 33.5 ± 6.1 kg/m2, P < 0.0001), body fat mass (48.1 ± 13.2 kg vs 37.1 ± 13.2 kg, P < 0.001) and body muscle mass (51.2 ± 11.1 kg vs 46.2 ± 9.6 kg, P < 0.001) decreased significantly after LSG. Post‐surgery liver function, as assessed by aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase, improved significantly. Furthermore, glycohemoglobin levels decreased significantly, despite efforts to wean patients off antidiabetic medications. The remission rate of diabetes was 50% (patients 1, 6, 10, 12 and 15). In contrast, with the high discontinuation rates of statin/fibrate, total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein were elevated. C‐reactive protein levels, an indicator for systemic inflammation, tended to be decreased after LSG (1.0 ± 1.9 mg/dL vs 0.44 ± 0.7 mg/dL, P = 0.27).
Figure 1.

Alterations in body composition after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). (a) Changes in body mass index (BMI). (b) Changes in muscle weight and fat weight. ***P < 0.001. The paired t‐test was used.
Changes in plasma metabolites after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Overall, 185 metabolites were detected, of which 48 could be quantified (Table S1). Principal coordinate analysis showed a dramatic change in the metabolite profile after LSG (Figure 2a). A volcano plot comparing the statistical significance and the post‐LSG metabolite fold‐change shows that 19 metabolite concentrations significantly changed after LSG. Plasma levels of 14 metabolites, including branched chain amino acids (BCAA; valine, leucine, isoleucine) and other essential amino acids (EAA; tryptophan and phenylalanin), tyrosine, choline, creatine, ornithine, hypoxanthine, 2‐oxoisovaleric acid, 2‐hydroxybutyric acid, N,N‐dimethylglycine and uridine decreased significantly after LSG. In contrast, plasma levels of five metabolites, including citric acid, succinic acid, malic acid, arginine and glycine, increased significantly after LSG (Figure 2b). A heatmap of the z‐scores for BMI and each metabolite show that LSG altered metabolites related to the tricarboxylic acid cycle and essential amino acids (Figure 2c).
Figure 2.

The alteration of plasma metabolites after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. (a) Principal coordinate analysis was carried out to compare the distribution of metabolites before (dot) and after (circle) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). (b) A volcano plot of statistical significance compared with the post‐LSG fold‐change of concentrations. (c) A heatmap of z‐scores for body mass index (BMI) and 48 metabolites. Arg, arginine; CA, citric acid; Cr, creatine; DG, dimethylglycine; Gly, glycine; HA, hydroxybutyric acid; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; MA, malic acid; Met, methionine; N.S., not significant; OA, oxoisovaleric acid; Orn, ornithine; Phe, phenylalanine; SA, succinic acid; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; Trp, tryptophan; Tyr, tyrosine; Val, valine.
Associations of plasma metabolites with clinical indices
Figure 3 shows the association between BMI and laboratory data and 48 metabolites. Several metabolites concentrations were significantly correlated with liver function, lipid profile, glucose, glycohemoglobin and C‐reactive protein.
Figure 3.

Associations of plasma metabolites with clinical indices. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the strength and direction of a link between two parameters. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. γ‐GTP, γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; Arg, arginine; AST, aspartate transaminase; BMI, body mass index; CA, citric acid; Cr, creatine; CRP, C‐reactive protein; DG, dimethylglycine; Glu, glucose; Gly, glycine; HA, hydroxybutyric acid; HbA1c, glycohemoglobin; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MA, malic acid; Met, methionine; OA, oxoisovaleric acid; Orn, ornithine; Phe, phenylalanine; SA, succinic acid; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; T‐Cho, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; Trp, tryptophan; Tyr, tyrosine; Val, valine.
DISCUSSION
This is the first report of non‐targeted plasma metabolomics analysis using CE‐TOFMS, and to identify metabolomic changes in morbidly obese patients before and after LSG 13 . In the present study group, 50% of patients showed remission of diabetes, which is consistent with a previous report 14 . Our key findings showed that: (i) LSG decreased plasma BCAA and EAA levels; and (ii) LSG increased plasma tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, such as citric acid, succinic acid and malic acid. Furthermore, we identified several metabolites that are significantly associated with clinical indices.
We observed a significant reduction of BCAA and EAA after LSG. There are several studies showing that BCAA and EAA contribute to the development of obesity. Previous reports from other Asian countries showed that Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass also significantly decreased blood BCAA levels, as assessed by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry in obese patients 15 , 16 . BCAA levels are regulated by BCAA catabolic enzyme activity in adipose tissues, and can be used as predictive biomarkers for obesity and insulin resistance 17 , 18 ; thus, decreased BCAA levels might reflect improved adipose tissue function. Furthermore, EAA and choline, which are predominantly present within eggs, red meat and fish 19 , were reduced after LSG. These results might derive from reduced food intake after LSG. Otherwise, gut microbiota can metabolize EAA and choline 19 , 20 , 21 ; thus, alterations in the gut microbiota after LSG, as has been previously reported 22 , 23 , 24 , might help explain the reductions in EAA and choline levels. Given that gut microbiota differ among ethnicities, it might be better to establish evidence in each country.
Interestingly, levels of metabolites related to the tricarboxylic acid cycle were significantly elevated after LSG. Previous human trials also showed increased serum citric acid levels, as assessed by liquid or gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry after LSG and Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass 25 , 26 . Furthermore, a study in mice showed that compared with a normal chow‐fed diet, a high‐fat diet depressed levels of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in the blood and liver 27 . Collectively, these indicate that LSG and its associated weight loss might improve mitochondrial function.
In summary, we identified dynamic alterations in plasma metabolite concentrations 3 months after LSG in 15 morbidly obese Japanese patients. Although food intake and the changes of medication might affect the plasma metabolite concentrations 28 , 29 , the present results support LSG as an effective therapeutic strategy for treating obesity not only as a weight loss surgery, but also as a metabolomic intervention 30 . The present findings have the potential to show how LSG ameliorates obesity and present novel therapeutic targets for treating obesity.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Table S1 | Alteration of plasma metabolites after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. LSG, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the study participants and grateful to the medical staff for their cooperation. We also thank Shinsuke Nakajima, Hiroyuki Sato and Reiko Oshima for their excellent support. This work was supported by PRIME from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (18069370, TY), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 19K23944 (NY), 19H03653 (TY), and Japan Innovative Bioproduction Kobe from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology, Hyogo Science and Technology Association (TY).
J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 123–129
Clinical Trial Registry University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000035635
References
- 1. Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019; 15: 288–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 254–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Abarca‐Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, et al Worldwide trends in body‐mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population‐based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017; 390: 2627–2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sjöström L. Surgical intervention as a strategy for treatment of obesity. Endocrine 2000; 13: 213–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kral JG, Näslund E. Surgical treatment of obesity. Nat Clin Pract Endoc 2007; 3: 574–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. O'Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al Long‐term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single‐centre review of 20‐year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 3–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pontiroli AE, Morabito A. Long‐term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 484–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Braghetto I, Korn O, Valladares H, et al Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical technique, indications and clinical results. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1442–1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Karmali S, Schauer P, Birch D, et al Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an innovative new tool in the battle against the obesity epidemic in Canada. Can J Surg 2010; 53: 126–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chopra A, Chao E, Etkin Y, et al Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: can it be considered a definitive procedure? Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 831–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ohashi Y, Hirayama A, Ishikawa T, et al Depiction of metabolome changes in histidine‐starved Escherichia coli by CE‐TOFMS. Mol Biosyst 2008; 4: 135–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sugimoto M, Wong DT, Hirayama A, et al Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry‐based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer‐specific profiles. Metabolomics 2010; 6: 78–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Samczuk P, Ciborowski M, Kretowski A. Application of metabolomics to study effects of bariatric surgery. J Diabetes Res 2018; 2018: 6270875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Min T, Prior SL, Churm R, et al Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on static and dynamic measures of glucose homeostasis and incretin hormone response 4‐years post‐operatively. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 46–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Luo P, Yu H, Zhao X, et al Metabolomics study of Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) to treat type 2 diabetes patients based on ultraperformance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2016; 15: 1288–1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tan HC, Khoo CM, Tan MZ‐W, et al The effects of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass on branched‐chain amino acid metabolism 1 year after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 1830–1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, et al A branched‐chain amino acid‐related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab 2009; 9: 311–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Herman MA, She P, Peroni OD, et al Adipose tissue branched chain amino acid (BCAA) metabolism modulates circulating BCAA levels. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 11348–11356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, et al Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 2011; 472: 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tang WH, Wang Z, Levison BS, et al Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1575–1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shoaie S, Ghaffari P, Kovatcheva‐Datchary P, et al Quantifying diet‐induced metabolic changes of the human gut microbiome. Cell Metab 2015; 22: 320–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sanmiguel CP, Jacobs J, Gupta A, et al Surgically induced changes in gut microbiome and hedonic eating as related to weight loss: preliminary findings in obese women undergoing bariatric surgery. Psychosom Med 2017; 79: 880–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ejtahed H‐S, Angoorani P, Hasani‐Ranjbar S, et al Adaptation of human gut microbiota to bariatric surgeries in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review. Microb Pathogen 2018; 116: 13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kikuchi R, Irie J, Yamada‐Goto N, et al The impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass on intestinal microbiota differs from that of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients with obesity. Clin Drug Investig 2018; 38: 545–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Samczuk P, Luba M, Godzien J, et al “Gear mechanism” of bariatric interventions revealed by untargeted metabolomics. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2018; 151: 219–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wijayatunga NN, Sams VG, Dawson JA, et al Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery alters serum metabolites and fatty acids in patients with morbid obesity. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev 2018; 34: e3045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Patel DP, Krausz KW, Xie C, et al Metabolic profiling by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry of energy metabolism in high‐fat diet‐fed obese mice. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0177953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Safai N, Suvitaival T, Ali A, et al Effect of metformin on plasma metabolite profile in the Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial. Diabetic Med 2018; 35: 944–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Myoenzono K, Yoshikawa T, Kumagai H, et al Changes in plasma amino acid concentrations in overweight and obese men after weight loss program including dietary modification and aerobic exercise. J Phys Fitness Sports Med 2020; 9: 43–51. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Frühbeck G. Bariatric and metabolic surgery: a shift in eligibility and success criteria. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2015; 11: 465–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1 | Alteration of plasma metabolites after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. LSG, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
