Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2020 Dec 21;11:582016. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.582016

Recent Advances in Biosorption of Copper and Cobalt by Filamentous Fungi

Leonce Dusengemungu 1,*, George Kasali 1, Cousins Gwanama 2, Kennedy Ochieng Ouma 2
PMCID: PMC7779407  PMID: 33408701

Abstract

Copper (Cu) and Cobalt (Co) are among the most toxic heavy metals from mining and other industrial activities. Both are known to pose serious environmental concerns, particularly to water resources, if not properly treated. In recent years several filamentous fungal strains have been isolated, identified and assessed for their heavy metal biosorption capacity for potential application in bioremediation of Cu and Co wastes. Despite the growing interest in heavy metal removal by filamentous fungi, their exploitation faces numerous challenges such as finding suitable candidates for biosorption. Based on current findings, various strains of filamentous fungi have high metal uptake capacity, particularly for Cu and Co. Several works indicate that Trichoderma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus species have higher Cu and Co biosorption capacity compared to other fungal species such as Geotrichum, Monilia, and Fusarium. It is believed that far more fungal species with even higher biosorption capability are yet to be isolated. Furthermore, the application of filamentous fungi for bioremediation is considered environmentally friendly, highly effective, reliable, and affordable, due to their low technology pre-requisites. In this review, we highlight the capacity of various identified filamentous fungal isolates for biosorption of copper and cobalt from various environments, as well as their future prospects.

Keywords: copper, cobalt, filamentous fungi, biosorption, bioremediation

Introduction

The biosorption of copper and cobalt by filamentous fungi has received a great deal of attention in recent years, as an emerging technology for minimizing the distribution of these heavy metals from mining wastes, e-wastes, and industrial wastewaters (Hussein et al., 2004; Dhankhar and Hooda, 2011; Ahemad and Kibret, 2013). The presence and persistence of elevated levels of heavy metals in the environment causes harmful effects on humans and other organisms mainly due to moderate accumulation over time. Leenu and Sheela (2016) reported that copper and cobalt bioaccumulation in Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) affects the plant growth, especially physiological processes and metabolism. The results of their study indicated that 800 μM of Cu and Co treatment had detrimental effects on the growth rates of E. crassipes especially on the development of leaves, stomata, and petioles. The reduced growth and size of aquatic fauna due to the presence of significantly harmful levels of heavy metals has also been observed by Nakayama et al., 2010).

Numerous reports have demonstrated that in heavy metal polluted environments, microbial populations develop the ability to adapt to the high contamination levels (Forster, 2003; Narendrula-Kotha and Nkongolo, 2017; Coelho et al., 2020). Nevertheless, there are concerns over heavy metal pollution from industries including mining, electroplating, dyeing, and tannery (Shukla and Vankar, 2014; Kapahi and Sachdeva, 2019). To address the effect of heavy metal contamination, chemical methods such as ion-exchange, electrochemical treatment, and chemical precipitation have been developed to control excess heavy metals in wastewater and agricultural fields (Shukla and Vankar, 2014). These conventional methods are usually expensive and ineffective whenever heavy metal concentrations in the environment occur in very low concentrations. Therefore, the option to complement and integrate conventional methods with biological methods such as filamentous biosorption and bioaccumulation is becoming increasingly attractive (Kapahi and Sachdeva, 2019). The basic and simplified laboratory process for fungal biosorption is demonstrated in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Typical laboratory schematic process of heavy metal biosorption by filamentous fungi (Biosorption analysis is accomplished from experiment 1 to 7).

Filamentous fungi are ubiquitous in the environment. The diameter of fungal hyphae is between 2 and 10 μm while a fungal mycelium comprises an interconnected network of mm- to cm-long hypha. Due to their vegetative features, filamentous fungi are among the most economical biofriendly biosorbents available today (Shah et al., 2020). Also, fungal biomasses can be easily produced by using cheap growth media. Moreover, they are easy to grow at a massive scale, with a considerably high biomass yield. Fungi are highly abundant in industrial waste products after fermentation and possess numerous advantages in comparison to other microorganisms such as bacteria (Table 3; Dhankhar and Hooda, 2011; Cárdenas González et al., 2019). According to Cerino-córdova et al. (2012), Aspergillus terreus Thom (1918), has the capacity to biosorb, 68.52% of copper from aqueous solutions. Although these results indicate that there is a possibility of using Aspergillus terreus as a biosorbent, its capacity is not yet satisfactory and more research are needed to enhance its chelating ability. Luckily, the investigation of biosorption of Cu and Co by Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi can be accomplished at a minimal cost (Drahansky et al., 2016).

TABLE 3.

The primary advantages and disadvantages of using filamentous fungi in bioaccumulation of heavy metals.

Characteristics Advantages Disadvantages References
Temperature Fungi can grow on various carbon sources such as fatty acids and oils which also indicate the capacity to withstand high temperature up to 40°C High efficiency is only observed at high temperatures, Inadequate for cold climates Ban et al., 2001; Iskandar et al., 2011
pH They can grow within a wide range of pH (2–9) which is an advantage since most wastewater varies in pH concentration Some time adjusting pH can increase the efficiency level Ozsoy, 2010
Rate of removal Fast and efficient compared to other means of bioremediation/maximum efficiency for removal of low concentrations of heavy metals from wastewater Depends on the sources of biomass as well as the concentration of heavy metals in wastewaters Barakat, 2011
Selectivity Depending on the type of heavy metal, can be modified through bioengineering Low selectivity Lakshmi et al., 2018; Igiri et al., 2018
Energy requirement Low Requires oxygen Harms et al., 2011; Lakshmi et al., 2018
Effectiveness Highly effective (They can supply a high range of organic substrates Fu and Wang, 2011
Cost Low, can be produced at the minimum operating cost Fan et al., 2008
Reuse and Regeneration It protects the environments allowing recovery of metals and reuses Siddiquee et al., 2015
Long-range transport Fungi adapt with resource heterogeneity by translocating resources between different parts of their mycelium Harms et al., 2011
Contamination -Low sludge generation compared to other removal techniques such as precipitation Might produce toxic substances at low rates compared with other conventional methods Fu and Wang, 2011
Variability Highly variable (can be used in an extremely contaminated environment, too acidic, or too dry) and produce a relatively large amount of biomass Fu and Wang, 2011; Harms et al., 2011

The distinctive characteristics of the rigid cell wall of fungi (Table 1) composed of mineral ions and nitrogens, as well as its filamentous branching growth habit, are what make fungi such great decomposers and great candidates for the biosorption of heavy metals (Naveena and Latha, 2018). Filamentous fungi typically accumulate metal ions into their mycelium and spores through the mechanisms that involve the fungal cell wall (intracellular/biosorption and extracellular/adsorption processes) which also plays a significant role for the existence and performance of the fungi, as well as energetic uptake and valence conversion (Siddiquee et al., 2015; Igiri et al., 2018; Naveena and Latha, 2018). The rigid cell wall has numerous advantageous characteristics. For instance, the chitin contains chitosan, a polymer of N-acetyl D-glucosamine, which enhances metal uptake and binding properties (Table 1; Naveena and Latha, 2018).

TABLE 1.

Types of Microorganisms used in bioremediation and their cell wall characteristics.

Microorganisms Cell wall References
The common groups in the cell wall are: amine, hydroxide, carboxyl, sulfate, and phosphate, sulfhydryl Gupta et al., 2000
Fungi Has chitin, mineral ions, lipids which contain polysaccharides and glycoproteins, which also has: amine, imidazole, phosphate (PO43–), sulfate, sulfhydryl, and hydroxyl (COO) groups (High percentage of cell wall material compared with other microorganisms) Lakshmi et al., 2018
Algae Algal cell walls are mainly cellulosic: the cell walls of brown algae contain fucoidin and alginic acid. The alginic acid offers anionic carboxylate and sulfate sites at neutral pH Gupta et al., 2000
Bacteria An outer layer of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), phospholipids and proteins and Functional groups: ketones, aldehydes, and carboxyl groups Lakshmi et al., 2018
Cyanobacteria Peptidoglycans which consist of linear chains of the disaccharide N-acetylglucosamine-β1,4-N-acetylmuramic acid with peptide chains Vannela and Verma, 2006
Yeast Contain a microfibrillar structure which is composed of more than 90% polysaccharides. Lakshmi et al., 2018

In addition to their ability to bind metals and withstand high variations in nutrient concentrations and other environmental parameters such as pH, anoxic, and temperature, filamentous fungi are usually used in fermentation industries (Dhankhar and Hooda, 2011; Lakshmi et al., 2018). Thus, it is practical to produce and use fungal biomass at large scale for industrial purposes such as bio-removal of metal ions from highly contaminated effluents. According to Lakshmi et al. (2018), the high number of fungal biosorbents is non-toxic and therefore, they are generally safe and easy to handle.

Microbial diversity is highly influenced by the level of contamination as well as contamination events in different locations. It has been demonstrated that long-term contamination is a crucial factor that determines the quality of water, soil, and microbial community besides environmental circumstances and soil characteristics (Crognale et al., 2017). Some studies have confirmed that prolonged contamination of a particular area positively impacts the abundance and immunity of microbial communities (Brandl et al., 1999; Sutton et al., 2013). In contrast, short-term pollution has a deleterious effect on microbial diversity and density (Bourceret et al., 2016). On the other hand, controversial studies have reported that both short-term and long-term exposure of soil to heavy metals results in a detrimental effect on soil microbial diversity (e.g., Narendrula-Kotha and Nkongolo, 2017). However, the fungal community dominated by Ascomycota isolated from aged multi-polluted soils was confirmed to adapt to rich microbial diversity compared to non-polluted areas (Bourceret et al., 2016; Crognale et al., 2017). In this regard, in-depth investigation of fungal tolerance and diversity in heavily contaminated environments especially mining sites is of fundamental importance since fungi represent a large proportion of biodiversity and biological matter. These saprophytes also play an essential role in maintaining proper functioning of the ecological system (Crognale et al., 2017). Taking into account that fungi and other microbial communities are crucial in biogeochemical recycling and influence the availability of metals, it is necessary to acquire in-depth knowledge of the taxonomic and functional diversity of fungal communities in heavy metal contaminated sites (Bourceret et al., 2016; Crognale et al., 2017; Narendrula-Kotha and Nkongolo, 2017).

Several filamentous fungi have been associated with the removal of copper and cobalt from aqueous environments (Table 2). Fungal biomass in large quantities can facilitate clean-up of contaminated waters and restoration of contaminated ecosystems. According to studies by Wang and Chen (2009) and Fu and Wang (2011), fungal biomass has a high affinity for copper and cobalt uptake. Therefore, they are relatively suitable for use in the decontamination of polluted sites. Propositions have been made to use filamentous fungi in combination with other microorganism matrices, such as bacteria, to increase biosorption efficiency. It is suggested that how the combination of fungi and other microorganisms (bacteria, algae, yeast) harvest their full potential for heavy metal biosorption remains a novel research area. The resistance mechanisms developed by these microorganisms mainly for their survival shows that they are highly efficient for detoxifying metal ions in aqueous solutions (Xie et al., 2010; Mohammadian et al., 2017). Developing new technologies for bioremediation is especially relevant in areas with heavy mining activities such as Zambia and The Democratic Republic of the Congo, where copper and cobalt pollutions pose serious public health and environmental hazard. Thus, the restoration of contaminated terrestrial and aquatic environments is necessary in order to reduce the severe impact of copper and cobalt pollution in these areas (Kapungwe, 2013; Ilunga wa Ilunga et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2019).

TABLE 2.

The application of different filamentous fungi for the removal of Cu and Co from different environmental matrices.

Heavy metal Fungal strain Environmental matrix Country Removal capacity (mg/g) References
Cu Acremonium persicinum (Nicot) W. Gams, (1971) Soil samples collected from the surface layer (0–30 cm) of the 69 Anguran lead-zinc mining Iran 50–100 Mohammadian et al., 2017
Alternaria alternata Fr. Keissl. (1912) Samples of water and sediment from five contaminated sites in the Moghogha river (Tangier) Morocco Ezzouhri et al., 2009
Alternaria chlamydosporigena Woudenb. Crous (2013) Soil samples collected from the surface layer (0–30 cm) of the 69 Anguran lead-zinc mining Iran 50–100 Mohammadian et al., 2017
Alternaria tenuis Nees (1816) United Kingdom 22.4 Somers, 1963
Aspergillus awamori (Nakaz, 1907) The Culture Collection of the Institute of Microbiology Bulgaria Tsekova, 2000
Aspergillus carbonarius (Bainier) Thom (1916) Obtained from a fermentation process Canada 11.6 Al-Asheh and Duvnjak, 1995
Aspergillus flavus Link (1809) Soil samples Pakistan 93.65 Iram et al., 2015
Aspergillus flavus ED4 Wise park industrial area, Palakkad India 10 Jayaraman and Arumugam, 2014
Aspergillus fumigatus Fresen. (1863) China 40 Yin et al., 2011
Aspergillus niger Tiegh. (1867) An open water system at the Langat River, Selangor Malaysia 20.910 + 0.581 Iskandar et al., 2011
Aspergillus oryzae (Ahlb.) Cohn (1884) Carolina Biological Supply Company United States 13.8 Huang et al., 1991
Aspergillus tamarii NRC3 Kita (1913) Egyptian soil Egypt Saad et al., 2019
Aspergillus terreus Thom (1918) India 160–180 Gulati et al., 2002
Mexico 15.24 Cerino-córdova et al., 2012
Aspergillus ustus (Bainier) Thom and Church (1926) Soil samples Saudi Arabia 0.6494 ± 0.006 Alothman et al., 2019
Aspergillus versicolor (Vuill.) Tirab. (1908) Soil samples Turkey 10.08 ± 0.7 Taştan et al., 2010
Fomitopsis meliae (Underw.) Gilb. (1981) Gemstone and gold mining sites in Southwestern, Nigeria Nigeria 0.78 Oladipo et al., 2018
Fusarium flocciferum Corda (1828) Portugal 2.3 Raftos and Radford, 2002
Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl. (1824) Romania 2.26 Simonescu and Ferdeş, 2012
Fusarium solani Mart.) Appel and Wollenw. (1910) Topsoil samples near petrol pumps United Kingdom 0.66 ± 0.20 Hong et al., 2010
Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg (1976) Soil samples collected from the surface layer (0–30 cm) of the 69 Anguran lead-zinc mining Iran 100–150 Mohammadian et al., 2017
Geotrichum sp. Link (1809) Agricultural field soil treated with municipal wastewater/industrial effluent India 0.7 Zafar et al., 2007
Hypocrea lixii Pat. (1891) Topsoil samples near petrol pumps United Kingdom 0.54 ± 0.09 Hong et al., 2010
Monilia sp. Bonord. (1851) Agricultural field soil treated with municipal wastewater/industrial effluent India 0.6 Zafar et al., 2007
Mucor rouxii (Calmette) Wehmer (1900) From the company Citric Belge (Tirlemont, Belgium). South Korea 200 Baik et al., 2002
Penicillium brevicompactum Dierckx (1901) The Collection of the Institute of Microbiology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Bulgaria 25.32 Tsekova et al., 2007
Penicillium Chrysogenum XJ-1 Thom (1910) Laboratory strain (GU733711) China 42.83 ± 0.57 Xu et al., 2018
Penicillium cyclopium Westling (1911) The Collection of the Institute of Microbiology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Bulgaria 50.0 Ianis et al., 2006
Penicillium griseofulvum Dierckx (1901) (Immobilized) Supplied by Cadila Healthcare Pvt, Ltd., Gujarat India 20.47 Shah et al., 1999
Penicillium griseofulvum Dierckx (1901) (free) Supplied by Cadila Healthcare Pvt, Ltd., Gujarat India 1.51 Shah et al., 1999
Penicillium italicum Wehmer (1894) Laboratory strain United Kingdom de Rome and Gadd, 1987
Penicillium notatum Westling (1911) 99.999% pure foils obtained from Alfa Products, United States 80 Siegel et al., 1983
Penicillium ochrochloron Biourge (1923) Japan Fuwa et al., 1977
Penicillium simplicissimum (Oudem.) Thom (1930) An open water system at the Langat River, Selangor Malaysia 10.767 ± 0.416 Iskandar et al., 2011
Penicillium spinulosum Thom (1910) 0.4–2 Townsley and Ross, 1985
Rhizopus arrhizus A. Fisch. (1892) From The United States Department of Agriculture Culture Collection Turkey 7.32 Aksu, 2003
Rhizopus arrhizus A. Fisch. (1892) The institute of microbial technology, Chandigarh India Preetha and Viruthagiri, 2007
Rhizopus microsporus Tiegh. (1875) Gemstone and gold mining sites in Southwestern, Nigeria Nigeria 1.02 Oladipo et al., 2018
Rhizopus oryzae Went and Prins.Geerl. (1895) From the company Citric Belge (Tirlemont, Belgium). South Korea 101 Baik et al., 2002
Seimatosporium pistaciae Crous and Mirab. (2014) Soil samples Iran 50–100 Mohammadian et al., 2017
Talaromyces helicus (Raper and Fennell) C.r. Benj. (1955) Co-contaminated sludge of the East Channel, near the YPF-oil Refinery, La Plata, Argentina. Argentina Romero et al., 2006
Trichoderma asperellum Samuels, Lieckf. and Nirenberg (1999) An open water system Malaysia 15.374 ± 0.370 Iskandar et al., 2011
Trichoderma atroviride P. Karst. (1892) Sewage sludge (Water treatment plant) Spain López Errasquín and Vázquez, 2003
Trichoderma ghanense Yoshim.Doi, Y. Abe and Sugiy. (1987) Gold and gemstone mine site soils Nigeria 1.27 Oladipo et al., 2018
Trichoderma harzianum Rifai (1969) Contaminated mining soils 650 Mohammadian et al., 2017
Trichoderma SP2F1 Sediment form Phenchala River Malaysia 28.75 Ting and Choong, 2009
Trichoderma virens (J.H. Mill., Giddens and A.A. Foster) Arx (1987) (PDR-28) Rhizosphere soil South Korea Babu et al., 2014
Trichoderma viride Schumach. (1803) The soil collected from a metal polluted site in New Delhi India 3.4 Anand et al., 2006
Co Aspergillus flavus Link (1809) Obtained from the mycology and plant pathology section, Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyd. N. crassa wild type (4200 a) India 50.8 Rashmi et al., 2004
Aspergillus niger Tiegh. (1867) The polluted air in a fuel station, near to the Faculty of Chemical Science, belonging to the Autonomous University of San Luis Potosı (San Luis Potosi, Mexico) Mexico 33 Cárdenas González et al., 2019
Aspergillus tamarii Kita (1913) NRC3 Egyptian soil Egypt Saad et al., 2019
Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl. (1824) Fungal Genetics Stock Centre (Kansas City, KS India Akthar et al., 1996
Geotrichum sp. Link (1809) Agricultural field soil treated with municipal wastewa-ter/industrial effluent India 0.1 Zafar et al., 2007
Monilia sp. Bonord. (1851) Agricultural field soil treated with municipal wastewa-ter/industrial effluent India 0.1 Zafar et al., 2007
Mortierella Coem. (1863) SPS 403 From serpentine soil samples India 1036.5 + 39.6 Pal et al., 2006
Mucor recemosus Fresen. (1850) Obtained from the mycology and plant pathology section, Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyd. N. crassa wild type (4200 a) India 64 Rashmi et al., 2004
Neurospora Shear and B.O. Dodge (1927) Fungal Genetics Stock Centre (Kansas City, KS India Akthar et al., 1996
Neurospora crassa CSM-1 and CSM-II Shear and B.O. Dodge (1927) Obtained from the mycology and plant pathology section, Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyd. N. crassa wild type (4200 a) India 44–29 Rashmi et al., 2004
Paecilomyces catenlannulatus Culture collection of microbiology laboratory, University of Huangshan, China China Li et al., 2014
Paecilomyces sp. Bainier (1907) The polluted air in a fuel station, near to the Faculty of Chemical Science Mexico 24 Cárdenas González et al., 2019
Penicillium brevicompactum Dierckx (1901) The Collection of the Institute of Microbiology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Bulgaria 54.64 Tsekova et al., 2007
Penicillium citrinum Thom (1910) Obtained from the mycology and plant pathology section, Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyd. N. crassa wild type (4200 a) India 126.4 Rashmi et al., 2004
Penicillium sp. Link (1809) The polluted air in a fuel station, near to the Faculty of Chemical Science Mexico 37 Cárdenas González et al., 2019
Penicillium sp. AND 104 From serpentine soil samples of Saddle hills, Chidyatapu and Rutland of Andaman Islands, India. India 882.4 + 16.4 Pal et al., 2006
Pythium sp.CTS 703 (Pringsh.1858) From serpentine soil samples India 670.6 + 10.7 Pal et al., 2006
Rhizopus arrhizus A. Fisch. (1892) PFBl-Laboratory stock isolates India 190 Suhasini et al., 1999
Rhizopus chinensis Saito (1904) Obtained from the mycology and plant pathology section, Department of Botany, Osmania University, Hyd. N. crassa wild type (4200 a) India 11.5 Rashmi et al., 2004
Talaromyces helicus (Raper and Fennell) C.r. Benj. (1955) Co-contaminated sludge of the East Channel, near the YPF-oil Refinery, La Plata, Argentina. Argentina Romero et al., 2006
Trichoderma sp. SPS 404 Pers. (1801) From serpentine soil samples India 660.4 + 15.0 Pal et al., 2006
Trichoderma viride Schumach. (1803) India 83.2 Rashmi et al., 2004

The present review attempts to enumerate the filamentous fungal species/strains/groups with comparatively high capacity to absorb copper and cobalt metal ions from contaminated environments. Progress in the development of technology to reduce the effect caused by copper and cobalt pollution through filamentous fungi biosorption is also discussed. A wide variety of filamentous fungi described in this article can be easily employed to create advanced heavy metal removal systems together with other biotreatment methods for maximum metal uptake efficiency in the future.

Potential Filamentous Fungi Species and Their Properties in Biosorption of Copper and Cobalt

Biosorption refers to the natural capacity of biological materials to accumulate heavy metals from diverse locations (mineral ores, mining wastes, industrial wastes and wastewaters, etc.). Biosorption occurs naturally in the environment, and recently, researchers have experimented with the ability of microorganisms to biosorb heavy metals and possibly valuable metals from several locations (Iram et al., 2015). Biosorption is one aspect of biohydrometallurgy based on the interactions between living microorganisms and metallic ions (Iskandar et al., 2011). Two principal bacteria families are used in biohydrometallurgy. These are the chemolithotrophic bacteria such as Thiobacillus thiooxidans Waksman and Joffe (1922) and Thiobacillus caldus Hallberg and Lindström (1995). Other heterotrophic microorganisms that can also be used include fungi, yeast, and other associated species (Johnson, 2014).

For reasons not well understood, the role of fungi species in the biosorption of heavy metals and other biohydrometallurgy purposes has been less regarded for extensive scale application (Borja et al., 2016; Liang and Gadd, 2017). This is despite their undeniable advantages over their counterparts, the acidophilic bacteria, such as their ability to grow over a wide range of pH from 1.0 to 9, and their higher sensitivity and capacity to accumulate more heavy metals (0.40–700 mg/g) compared to bacteria biosorption (0.70–500 mg/g) (Ahemad and Kibret, 2013). Numerous researches have published findings on the biosorption of heavy metals by filamentous fungi but mostly under controlled laboratory-scale environments (Zafar et al., 2007; Ezzouhri et al., 2009; Siddiquee et al., 2013; Mohammadian et al., 2017). To understand, clearly and in detail, the progress in biosorption of heavy metals by filamentous fungi, our review has focused mainly on the biosorption of copper and cobalt from heavy metal contaminated environments (Table 2).

Aspergillus Species

The Aspergillus species are filamentous fungi ubiquitous in the environment. They possess many industrial applications, including practical applications in biosorption of heavy metals from contaminated sites. These species have enormous ability to create a metal sink coupled with their capacity to produce organic acids that can bioleach metals. There are four popular species of Aspergillus: A. niger, A. flavus, A. versicolor, and A. tamarii NRC 3 used for biosorption (Oladipo et al., 2018; Table 2).

Aspergillus flavus Link (1809)

Aspergillus flavus isolated from effluent samples obtained from wise park industrial area, India, was examined for its biosorption ability to uptake Cu (II). The results demonstrated that 80% of copper could be biosorbed from an aqueous solution (Jayaraman and Arumugam, 2014). The findings confirmed that A. flavus can be classified among potential biosorbents for the clean-up of copper contaminated environments. Their results showed that biosorbents after the removal of copper or other heavy metals could be reused or regenerated again. In addition, the above results agree with the findings by Rao et al. (2002), which indicated that A. flavus (DSF-8) could also be used in the bioleaching of copper.

In another study by Qayyum et al. (2019), A. flavus isolated from contaminated soil has shown high effectiveness in the biosorption of heavy metals. The study concluded that with sucrose as a carbon source at 30°C and pH of 7, bioleaching of Pb, Cd, and Zn with A. flavus was possible. It was also suggested that the use of A. flavus for contaminated soil bioremediation could be applied for maximum results whenever the optimal conditions for the growth of A. flavus are provided.

Synthetic flocculants can be employed in wastewater treatment, but they mainly have a disadvantage due to their toxicity (David et al., 2019). Therefore, in an attempt to minimize the toxicity and use a more ecofriendly and biodegradable flocculant, A. flavus and Paenibacillus elgii Kim (2004) isolated from wastewater were found more suitable in the production of microbial flocculants which can be used widely for the downstream treatment of wastewater (David et al., 2019).

Aspergillus versicolor (Vuill.) Tirab. (1908)

Aspergillus versicolor has demonstrated significant affinity to heavy metals under certain pH ranges. For instance, it has been demonstrated that for A. versicolor, maximum pH values for optimum heavy metal bioaccumulation are around 6 for 50 mg/L of Cr (VI) and Ni (II) while pH 5 is suitable for Cu (II) ions with the 99.89, 30.05, and 29.06% removal efficiencies, respectively (Taştan et al., 2010). Although the biosorption capacity of A. versicolor is still unsatisfactory for Cu removal from aqueous solution, it has a promising future application in biosorption of heavy metals.

Aspergillus niger Tiegh. (1867)

Previous studies have tested Aspergillus niger for its removal capacity of heavy metals from industrial as well as swine wastewaters. The results indicated that A. niger could absorb 45.54% of Pb and 59.67% of Cd and 91% of the copper from the swine wastewaters (Pal and Basumajumdar, 2002). A study by Kapoor et al. (1999) which also evaluated the ability of live A. niger biomass to uptake Pb, Cd, Cu and Ni from wastewaters and found that the removal of these heavy metals was higher when the Aspergillus biomass was used compared to granular activated carbon (E-400). The above experiments demonstrate that A. niger can be used to accumulate metals from the contaminated environments. However, more research is needed to increase the biosorption capacity of A. niger and enhance more efficient use of the fungal.

Aspergillus tamarii NRC 3 Kita (1913)

Aspergillus tamarii NRC 3 obtained from contaminated Egyptian soil was used as a biosorbent for the bioremoval and bio-recovery of heavy metals (Saad et al., 2019). From the findings, live A. tamarii NRC 3 biomass could absorb 90.94% Cu (II), 29.13 of Pb (II), 60% of Co (II), 40% of Ni (II), 34.47% of Fe (II), and 11.45% of Cr (II) respectively. Their findings concluded that A. tamarii NRC 3 biomass, even though its biosorption process is affected by temperature, pH, metal ions concentration, and changing time through the optimization of these parameters, the performance of A. tamarii can be improved (Saad et al., 2019).

Trichoderma Species

The Trichoderma spp. are among the highly diverse community of filamentous fungi worldwide. They contain teleomorphs and have been classified into the order of Hypocreales in the Ascomycete division. These species are also among the most culturable fungi whose group members are considered very popular for their biocontrol capacity, which can facilitate to eliminate a broad range of plant pathogenic fungi (Table 2; Nongmaithem et al., 2016). They are also known for plant growth enhancement (Yedidia et al., 1999), inducing oriented and systematic plant defense responses against pathogens (Harman et al., 2004; Nongmaithem et al., 2016). Since the Trichoderma spp. are extremely interactive in soil and plant roots, they play a significant role in the environment by facilitating in the decomposition of plant residues, biodegradation of industrial chemicals as well as bioremoval/bioaccumulation of a wide range of heavy metals from wastewaters and soil, due to their unique cell-wall characteristics which are mainly composed of glucan polymers and chitin (Nongmaithem et al., 2016; Akhtar and Mannan, 2020).

Trichoderma atroviride P. Karst. (1892)

Trichoderma atroviride has been used for many industrial processes, including the uptake of heavy metals. Trichoderma atroviride obtained from sewage sludge was tested for its ability to tolerate high concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cd (López Errasquín and Vázquez, 2003). It was found that the autolyzed mycelia of T. atroviride reached the highest values of heavy metal removal while the lowest was recorded when glucose was supplemented. This shows that the composition of the medium has an essential effect on metal uptake (López Errasquín and Vázquez, 2003). In a similar study by Yazdani et al. (2009), Trichoderma atroviride extracted from the copper polluted river sediment was found to biosorb between 0.8 and 11.2 mg/g of Cu from potato dextrose liquid medium. From the above results, it is confirmed that T. atroviride can be used as a bioremediating agent instead of conventional chemical precipitation, chemical oxidation, and reduction methodologies for wastewater treatment.

Trichoderma virens (J.H. Mill., Giddens and A. A. Foster) Arx (1987)

Trichoderma virens is well known for its ability to produce antibiotics and also its mycoparasitic capacity (Harman et al., 2004). Babu et al. (2014) categorized T. virens as a metal tolerant fungus because of its potential to tolerate heavy metals such as Pb, Cd, Cu, As, and Zn from the liquid media comprised of 100 mg/L of heavy metals. Their results also suggested that the T. virens-PDR-28 can be used for plant biomass production as well as phytostabilisations in mine tailing soils with high heavy metal levels.

Trichoderma ghanense Yoshim Doi, Y. Abe and Sugiy. (1987)

Oladipo et al. (2018) assessed Trichoderma ghanense isolated from a gold and gemstone mine site soil for its tolerance to a high, wide range of heavy metals (As, Fe, Cd, Cu, Pb). Their findings established that T. ghanense possesses high resistance to high concentrations of heavy metals, which indicates that it can be used for bioremediation of heavy metal polluted areas. The T. ghanense has also been reported to secrete ligninolytic enzymes that can biodegrade heavy metals and antioxidant enzymes with the capacity to minimize oxidative stress due to heavy metal pollution (Akhtar and Mannan, 2020).

Trichoderma SP2F1

Ting and Choong (2009) isolated Trichoderma SP2F1 from the sediment samples from Penchala River, Malaysia, highly contaminated with industrial effluents. Their results have demonstrated that Trichoderma SP2F1 was capable of removing Cu (II) in aqueous solutions. The bioaccumulation capacity of viable SP2F1 to remove copper ions was 19.6 mg/g while the non-viable SP2F1 cells removal capacity of 28.75 mg/g. This indicates that both viable and non-viable Trichoderma sp. cells can be used to treat sewage wastes or other wastewaters to remove Cu (II). The potential application of the Trichoderma spp. for biosorption purposes have been thoroughly reviewed by Gupta et al. (2014) and Sharma et al. (2019).

Penicillium Species

According to Ianis et al. (2006), the young Penicillium spp., mycelia, have a far greater capacity for heavy metal biosorption than the old mycelia. The potential of Penicillium biomass for removing metal ions from wastewaters was also acknowledged by Zafar et al. (2007) and Iskandar et al., 2011). The data presented from their studies showed that Penicillium sp. had higher bioremediation potential for contaminated ecosystems compared to other filamentous fungi strains such as Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Fusarium, Alternaria, Geotrichum, Rhizopus, and Monilia. Zafar et al. (2007) identified several filamentous fungi, including Penicillium spp. from agricultural soil contaminated by heavy metals. Interestingly, it was also noticed that agricultural soil exposed to heavy metal from municipal and industrial wastewaters for more than 20 years possess a wide variety of metal resistant fungi.

Penicillium simplicissimum (Oudem.) Thom (1930)

Penicillium spp. isolated from contaminated sediment in Malaysia were tested for their potential biosorption capacity (Iskandar et al., 2011). The results indicated promising metal ion inhibitory concentrations of Co, Cr, Cu, Cd, and Ni from aqueous solutions. The inhibitory concentrations ranged from 4 to 8 mg/L for Penicillium simplicissimum isolates. These results confer with the study by Mohammadian et al. (2017), which also confirmed that P. simplicissimum has a higher capacity for Cu (II) uptake compared to other filamentous fungi [Fusarium verticillioides, Acremonium persicinum, Seimatosporium pistaciae Crous and Mirab. (2014), Alternaria chlamydosporigena Woudenb. and Crous (2013)].

Rhizopus arrhizus A. Fisch. (1892)

The Rhizopus arrhizus is zygomycete fungi whose biomass capacity for uptake of metal ions has been previously reported (Tobin et al., 1987; Pal and Basumajumdar, 2002; Cara et al., 2018).

Copper uptake by R. arrhizus biomass ranged between 50 and 150 mg/mL (de Rome and Gadd, 1987) while the results by Preetha and Viruthagiri (2007) recorded that under optimized process conditions (4.14 of pH, 37.75°C of temperature, 53.84 mg/L of initial copper ion concentration, and 8.17 g/L of biomass loading) about 98.34% copper removal from aqueous solution can be achieved.

Hence, Rhizopus arrhizus is one of the most promising fungi for industrial heavy metal biosorption (Preetha and Viruthagiri, 2007). Research has also established that living microbial biomass of R. arrhizus can biosorb 37.785 mg/g of copper with 100 mg biomass and 19.464 mg/g of Cu with 200 mg of biomass (Chauhan et al., 2020).

Biosorption Mechanisms of Heavy Metals by Microbiota

The heavy metal accumulation ability of microorganisms such as bacteria (Kumari et al., 2015; Narendrula-Kotha and Nkongolo, 2017), yeast (Bahafid et al., 2017), algae (Mehta and Gaur, 2005; Kipigroch et al., 2016; Bwapwa et al., 2017), and filamentous fungi (Gadd, 1993; More et al., 2010; Liang and Gadd, 2017) has been studied broadly (Figure 2). Their ability for heavy metal removal is relatively higher compared to the conventional non-biological industrial methods. It has been shown that the primary mechanism through which bacteria, filamentous fungi, algae, and yeast accumulate numerous heavy metals is adsorption, which does not require energy for metabolism. Alternatively, in living cells of some of the bacteria, heavy metals are accumulated through absorption, which generally does depend on energy metabolism. Most microbes show the capacity to rapidly absorb a high quantity of heavy metal ions (Ismail and Moustafa, 2016). The primary mechanisms through which microbes immobilize heavy metals are complex and depend on the type of microorganisms (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Mechanisms of heavy metals absorption by microorganisms.

Biosorption of Heavy Metals by Fungal Species

In recent years, the bioremoval mechanisms of heavy metals by some fungal species has been partially studied (Figures 2, 3) and the efficiency of such fungal species to remove heavy metals determined. But still, some mechanisms are not well understood (Suhasini et al., 1999; Taştan et al., 2010; Mathew et al., 2016; Acosta-Rodríguez et al., 2018). The sophisticated cell wall structure profoundly influences the biosorption of heavy metals by fungal species (Table 1). For example, the adsorption mechanism in fungi comprises of metals ions on the cell surface, from where they can be adsorbed into the cell through one mechanism or combined processes (Dhankhar and Hooda, 2011). There is limited research on the fungal mechanisms for biosorption and the exact performance of fungi has not been clarified (Figure 3). It is also noted that little information is known about the effect of combining fungal biomasses with other microbial biomasses. Therefore, it is assumed that the combinations might improve the removal efficiency in some cases (Dhankhar and Hooda, 2011). However, biosorption competence is also determined by filamentous fungi species and adaptability levels depending on the environmental matrix (air, soil, water) where it was obtained (Oladipo et al., 2018).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Biosorption mechanisms of copper, cobalt and other heavy metals by filamentous fungi, modified from Ahemad and Kibret (2013) and Siddiquee et al. (2015).

The mechanism by which filamentous fungi biosorb metal ions out of aqueous solution is complex due to the fungi cell wall structure (Figure 3; Akthar et al., 1996). The biosorption mechanisms can be classified into two categories based on cell metabolism; the non-metabolism dependent and metabolism-dependent. Depending on the location where the heavy metal ion is extracted from in the solution, biosorption could be arrayed as: (1) Extracellular accumulation (i) adsorption, (ii) ion exchange and complexation, (iii) Redox- reaction; (2) Intracellular accumulation absorption; and (3) Cell surface sorption/Precipitation: metabolic dependent transport.

Further, the past studies on biosorption detected that whenever there was the binding of metal ions on Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium sp., Neurospora crassa, the release of Ca2+ and Mg2+ was consequently triggered within the medium (Akthar et al., 1996).

Factors Affecting Bioremoval of Copper and Cobalt Ions by Filamentous Fungi

Effect of the Initial Concentration of Copper and Cobalt

Earlier studies have shown that the increase of biosorption capacity correlated with both fungal biomasses and the initial cobalt concentration. Cárdenas González et al. (2019) confirmed that the percentage of adsorption decreased whenever Co (II) concentration increased from 300 to 600 mg/L during the biosorption of cobalt ions by Penicillium spp. and A. niger. In similar biosorption studies, it has been reported that maximum Cu (II) and Co (II) uptake by Aspergillus tamarii NRC 3 biomass was 92.40 and 60%, respectively, in a solution comprising 5 g of A. tamarii wet biomass (Saad et al., 2019). It has also been observed that the removal capacity differs with fungal species. For example, during cobalt biosorption by filamentous fungi from the soil (Trichoderma, Penicillium, Paecilomyces, Pythium, Rhizopus, Mortierella, and Aspergillus), the initial concentration of Co (II) resulted in increased removal capacity, achieving the maximum value of about 1036.8 μM of Co (II) uptake by Mortierella SPS 403 biomass at a maximum of 5.0 mM Co (II) concentration (Pal et al., 2006)

In previous studies on the tolerance of filamentous fungi to heavy metals, Trichoderma atroviride was found to tolerate high copper concentrations from 0 to 300 mg/L (López Errasquín and Vázquez, 2003). This correlates with the results by Romero et al. (2006), which suggested that the level of the metal accumulated is directly proportional to the heavy metal concentration due to the difference demonstrated by forces applied in the adsorption process. For example, with Talaromyces helicus (Raper and Fennell) C.r. Benj. (1955), it was remarked that the heavy metal uptake also increased from 100 to 200 mg/L with increasing Co (II) ion concentration from 100 to 600 ppm (Romero et al., 2006). This may be due to the high competition for the functional groups that appear on the surface of the fungal biomass ions (Cárdenas González et al., 2019).

Further studies by Tsekova and Todorova (2002) demonstrated that the microbial growth of Aspergillus niger B-77 related to the initial concentration of Cu (II). They have also shown that the metal uptake increased with the increase of Cu (II) concentrations. Where concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg/L Cu (II) ions were used for 24 h of cultivation, the accumulation levels were 3.7, 7.2, and 19.2 mg/g, respectively. A higher concentration of initial Cu (II) negatively affected the uptake of Cu (II). At 300 mg/L of Cu (II), neither microbial growth nor accumulation of Cu (II) was noticed. The maximum uptake was only observed at 200 mg/L of Cu (II) ions (Tsekova and Todorova, 2002).

Effect of Initial Biomass Concentration for Copper and Cobalt Removal

Jayaraman and Arumugam (2014) demonstrated that the effect of the amount of biomass on the biosorption capacity is increased whenever the amount of fungal biomass is also increased. In the heavy metal solution, when 10 g rather than 5 g of the fungal biomass of Paecilomyces spp. was used, nearly 100% of the heavy metal was absorbed in only 16 h (Figure 4). Other filamentous fungi like Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus niger depicted high metal biosorption capacity at 24 h with 100 and 98% biosorption rates, respectively. In addition, Jayaraman and Arumugam (2014) demonstrated that Aspergillus flavus biomass correlated with the Cu (II) concentration. It was obvious that by increasing the amount of biomass from 1 to 10 mg/L, the metal removal capacity also extensively augmented with the highest recorded value of Cu (II) of 26.27 mg/g metal removal at 4 mg/mL of biosorbents. The increase in the removal capacity is mainly attributed to the amount of the added biosorbents fixed, the available number of binding sites and the adsorption surface area for metal biosorption (Figure 4) (Cárdenas González et al., 2019). Similar observations have been reported elsewhere with the same effect for P. aeruginosa SPB-1 (Paraneeiswaran et al., 2014), and for Cladonia rangiformis hoffm (Horsfall and Spiff, 2005). The same was noted on the biosorption of Co (II) from aqueous solutions by C. nucifera L. (Hymavathi and Prabhakar, 2017).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The effect of fungal biomass concentration on the removal of Co (II) (500 mg/L, 100 rpm, 28°C, pH 5.0, 24 h) Extracted from Cárdenas González et al. (2019).

The desorption percentage from Cu (II) accumulated biomasses was 80% under 0.1 N of NaOH and 0.1 N of HNO3, respectively. The regeneration of heavy metals and biosorbents by desorption is very crucial in applying the biosorption process industrially because it determines the cost of the entire process and the potential metal recovery performance (Ekmekyapar et al., 2006).

Effect of pH and Incubation Time on the Removal of Copper and Cobalt

To understand the effect of both the incubation time and pH on biosorption of Co (II), 200 mg/L of the dried fungal biomass was used to determine the maximum biosorption in 24 h of incubation at pH 5.0 Aspergillus niger, Penicillium spp., and Paecilomyces spp. absorbed 93, 77.5, and 70.4% of Co (II), respectively (Cárdenas González et al., 2019). The above results concur with those obtained from an experiment with Penicillium cyclopium by Westling (1911) whereby the maximum biosorption of Cu and Co was also observed at pH 5 in 24 h of incubation time. It was also found that with Paecilomyces catenlannulatus, the uptake of Co augmented with the increasing pH from 4.5 to 7. The highest biosorption was recorded at pH 7.0. This was probably due to the Co (OH)2(s) precipitation (Li et al., 2014). This process can be justified by the fact that there was less competition among positively charged H+ and Co 2+ functional groups. So as the pH increases, additional ligands are displayed, and a higher number of negatively charged groups on the adsorbent matrix rise, improving the biosorption of every cationic species (Vafajoo et al., 2018).

Using Aspergillus niger for Cu (II) removal, multiple biomass samples were incubated at separate time intervals. The highest maximum removal capacity of A. niger was observed in 18 h of 25.2 mg/g Cu (II). Similar results have been reported with biosorption of Hg (II) by Rhizopus oligosporus Saito (1905) where the maximum biosorption was 33.33 mg/g at pH 6 under 6 h of incubation time (Ozsoy, 2010).

The Effect of the Temperature on the Removal of Co (II) and Cu (II)

Temperature affects the biosorption of heavy metals. For the removal of Co (II), it has been shown that the highest adsorption capacity occurred at 50 ± 1°C: 100, 97.1, and 94.1%, for Paecilomyces sp., Penicillium sp., and A. niger, respectively, over 24 h. These reports are identical to those obtained for P. catenlannulatus, as the biosorption of Co (II) augmented with increasing temperature from 20 to 40°C (Cárdenas González et al., 2019).

During the removal of Cu (II), the biosorption capacity of Aspergillus niger was 26.2 mg/g at 31°C in the adsorption medium because the cell wall components stability is mostly influenced by temperature (Saad et al., 2019). It has also been reported that higher temperatures play a significant role in the enhancement of the adsorption ability of the fungal biomasses, which explains that in environments with elevated temperatures, such as in the tropics, it is favorable and practical to use fungal biomasses for bioremediation. High temperatures increase the activation of the adsorbing surfaces and enhance diffusivity of the heavy metal while catalyzing the movements of metal ions (Jayaraman and Arumugam, 2014; Cárdenas González et al., 2019).

Summary and Prospects

Industrial wastewaters from mining and other industries released without treatments are harmful to the environment. Therefore, the environmental-friendly methods to dispose or recycle the wastewaters are among the emerging research areas, especially in the optimization of parameters (pH, incubation time, temperature, initial concentration, energy requirements, etc.) for metal ions removal and other contaminants from wastewaters. In developing countries, freshwater resources are scarce. Unfortunately, the available resources in mining areas are contaminated by high discharges of mining wastes into the aquatic systems posing a risk to both these ecosystems and human health (Drahansky et al., 2016; Mwaanga et al., 2019). The high Co (II) and Cu (II) concentrations, especially in mining and industrial wastes are among the substances of health concern since these metals are not biodegradable. Both tend to bioaccumulate in the living organisms and biomagnify along the food web resulting in several diseases and disorders (Drahansky et al., 2016).

The use of fungal biomasses for biosorption has attracted the attention of many researchers due to their numerous advantages (Table 3). According to data in Table 2, fungi have a high capacity to accumulate copper and cobalt. For advancements in bioremediation research, more fungal isolates should be obtained from copper and cobalt mining areas and investigated for their potential application. Their mechanisms of biosorption also warrants further research. In addition, the techniques to regenerate and use fungal biomass need further evaluation and improvement for deployment in areas which do not require advanced remediation technologies.

Due to the significant heavy metal pollution in developing countries that rely heavily on mining activities, a possible solution would be to use microorganisms for both biomining and bioremediation due to their eco-friendliness and cost-effectiveness. The information in this review shows that filamentous fungi have an exceptional capacity for exploration in the future for industrial-scale biosorption operations. Therefore, more understanding of microorganisms is needed, for instance in developing countries such as Zambia, one of the developing countries with nearly 6% of the total global reserve of copper and has among the world’s largest cobalt reserves that have been mined since the 1900s. There are minimum reports available of microbial and fungal diversity from the contaminated mining and other industrials sites (Staniland et al., 2010). Still, several reports have mentioned the accumulation of toxic heavy metals in the ecosystems (aquatic environments such as rivers, sediments), soil, atmosphere, and plants that can harmfully impact the human health, but also demonstrate the probability of high microbial diversity in such environments (Syakalima et al., 2001; Ikenaka et al., 2010; Elisha et al., 2012; Mugo and Town, 2013; Lindahl, 2014). Fortunately, according to studies conducted elsewhere in heavily contaminated sites, it was noticed that the long-term toxic impact of heavy metal pollutants usually increases the number of indigenous microbial diversities. In particular, bacteria and fungi in such areas were found with high tolerance potential to heavy metals due to the increased adaptation capacity over longtime exposure to contaminants. Some of the fungi are reported to thrive at high (toxic) metal ions concentrations (Bourceret et al., 2016). Therefore, future research should also focus on identifying and analyzing the potential of these microorganisms in similar sites for potential application in bioremediation.

Based on the data from this review, even though there is considerable knowledge about the fungal community in contaminated areas, there are still numerous gaps in developing countries with high reserves of minerals impacted by the severe effects of high contaminations due to traditional mining and handling of mining wastes. Therefore, further studies are necessary to fill the gaps in our scientific knowledge of these unidentified microbial communities. The wide research and development gap in advanced and environmentally friendly technologies for bioremediation of heavy metal contaminants should also be filled.

Author Contributions

LD researched, wrote, and prepared the tables and figures for the first draft of this review. GK, CG, and KOO contributed to critical inputs, and designed and edited the last draft. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This review article writing was supported by the Copperbelt University, African Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Mining (CBU ACESM).

References

  1. Acosta-Rodríguez I., Cárdenas-González J. F., Rodríguez Pérez A. S., Oviedo J. T., Martínez-Juárez V. M. (2018). Bioremoval of different heavy metals by the resistant fungal strain Aspergillus niger. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2018:3457196. 10.1155/2018/3457196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahemad M., Kibret M. (2013). Recent trends in microbial biosorption of heavy metals: a review. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1 19–26. 10.12966/bmb.06.02.2013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akhtar N., Mannan M. A. (2020). Mycoremediation: expunging environmental pollutants. Biotechnol. Rep. 26:e00452. 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aksu Z. (2003). The effect of Cd (II), Pb (II) and Cu (II) ions on the growth and bioaccumulation properties of Rhizopus arrhizus. Process Biochem. 39 105–110. 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00032-33 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Akthar N., Sivarama Sastry K., Maruthi Mohan P. (1996). Mechanism of metal ion biosorption by fungal biomass. BioMetals 9 21–28. 10.1007/BF00188086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alothman Z. A., Bahkali A. H., Khiyami M. A., Alfadul S. M., Wabaidur S. M., Alam M., et al. (2019). Low cost biosorbents from fungi for heavy metals removal from wastewater. Sep. Sci. Technol. 55 1766–1775. 10.1080/01496395.2019.1608242 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Asheh S., Duvnjak Z. (1995). Adsorption of copper and chromium by Aspergillus carbonarius. Biotechnol. Prog. 11 638–642. 10.1021/bp00036a006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anand P., Isar J., Saran S., Saxena R. K. (2006). Bioaccumulation of copper by Trichoderma viride. Bioresour. Technol. 97 1018–1025. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Babu A. G., Shim J., Bang K. S., Shea P. J., Oh B. T. (2014). Trichoderma virens PDR-28: a heavy metal-tolerant and plant growth-promoting fungus for remediation and bioenergy crop production on mine tailing soil. J. Environ. Manage. 132 129–134. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bahafid W., Joutey N. T., Asri M., Sayel H., Tirry N., Ghachtouli N. (2017). Yeast biomass: an alternative for bioremediation of heavy metals. Yeast - Industrial Applications. ed. Morata A., (Rijeka: IntechOpen; ) 10.5772/intechopen.70559 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baik W. Y., Bae J. H., Cho K. M., Hartmeier W. (2002). Biosorption of heavy metals using whole mold mycelia and parts thereof. Bioresour. Technol. 81 167–170. 10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00148-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ban K., Kaieda M., Matsumoto T., Kondo A., Fukuda H. (2001). Whole cell biocatalyst for biodiesel fuel production utilizing Rhizopus oryzae cells immobilized within biomass support particles. Biochem. Eng. J. 8 39–43. 10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00133-139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Barakat M. A. (2011). New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 4 361–377. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Borja D., Nguyen K. A., Silva R. A., Park J. H., Gupta V., Han Y., et al. (2016). Experiences and future challenges of bioleaching research in South Korea. Minerals 6:128 10.3390/min6040128 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourceret A., Cébron A., Tisserant E., Poupin P., Bauda P., Beguiristain T., et al. (2016). The bacterial and fungal diversity of an aged PAH- and heavy metal-contaminated soil is affected by plant cover and edaphic parameters. Microb. Ecol. 71 711–724. 10.1007/s00248-015-0682-688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brandl H., Bosshard R., Wegmann M. (1999). Computer-munching microbes: metal leaching from electronic scrap by bacteria and fungi. Process Metall. 9 569–576. 10.1016/S1572-4409(99)80146-80141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bwapwa J. K., Jaiyeola A. T., Chetty R. (2017). Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using algae strains: a review. South African J. Chem. Eng. 24 62–70. 10.1016/j.sajce.2017.06.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cara M., Sanzani S. M., Mincuzzi A., Ippolito A., Cara O., Merkuri J. (2018). Isolation of Rhizopus arrhizus from Albanian barley. J. Inst. Brew 124 341–343. 10.1002/jib.521 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cárdenas González J. F., Rodríguez Pérez A. S., Vargas Morales J. M., Martínez Juárez V. M., Rodríguez I. A., Cuello C. M., et al. (2019). Bioremoval of Cobalt(II) from aqueous solution by three different and resistant fungal biomasses. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2019 1–8. 10.1155/2019/8757149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cerino-córdova F. J., García-león A. M., Soto-regalado E., Sánchez-gonzález M. N. (2012). Experimental design for the optimization of copper biosorption from aqueous solution by Aspergillus terreus. J. Environ. Manage. 95 S77–S82. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chauhan J., Saini I., Kaushik P. (2020). Studies on the biosorption potential of copper by Rhizopus arrhizus Biomass. bioRxiv [preprint] 10.1101/2020.07.13.201566 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chileshe M. N., Syampungani S., Festin E. S., Tigabu M., Daneshvar A., Odén P. C. (2019). Physico-chemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations of copper mine wastes in Zambia: implications for pollution risk and restoration. J. For. Res. 31 1283–1293. 10.1007/s11676-019-00921-920 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Coelho E., Reis T. A., Cotrim M., Mullan T. K., Corrêa B. (2020). Resistant fungi isolated from contaminated uranium mine in Brazil shows a high capacity to uptake uranium from water. Chemosphere 248:126068 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crognale S., Annibale A. D., Pesciaroli L., Stazi S. R. (2017). Fungal community structure and as-resistant fungi in a decommissioned gold mine site. Front. Microbiol. 8:2202. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. David O. M., Oluwole O. A., Ayodele O. E., Lasisi T. (2019). Characterisation of fungal bioflocculants and its application in water treatment. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 34 1–9. 10.9734/cjast/2019/v34i630159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Rome L., Gadd G. M. (1987). Copper adsorption by Rhizopus arrhizus, Cladosporium resinae and Penicillium italicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 84–90. 10.1007/BF00282153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dhankhar R., Hooda A. (2011). Fungal biosorption – an alternative to meet the challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Environ. Technol. 32 467–491. 10.1080/09593330.2011.572922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Drahansky M., Paridah M., Moradbak A., Mohamed A., Owolabi F., Abdulwahab T., Asniza M., et al. (2016). “Application of biosorption for removal of heavy metals from wastewater,” in Biosorption, eds Derco J., Vrana B. (London: Intechopen; ). [Google Scholar]
  29. Ekmekyapar F., Aslan A., Bayhan Y. K., Cakici A. (2006). Biosorption of copper(II) by nonliving lichen biomass of Cladonia rangiformis hoffm. J. Hazard. Mater. 137 293–298. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Elisha N., Banda C., Jhonnah M. (2012). Air pollution on the copperbelt province of zambia: effects of Sulphur Dioxide on vegetation and humans. J. Nat. Environ. Sci. 3 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ezzouhri L., Castro E., Moya M., Espinola F., Lairini K. (2009). Heavy metal tolerance of filamentous fungi isolated from polluted sites in Tangier, Morocco. African J. Microbiol. Res. 3 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan T., Liu Y., Feng B., Zeng G., Yang C., Zhou M., et al. (2008). Biosorption of cadmium(II), zinc(II) and lead(II) by Penicillium simplicissimum: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater. 160 655–661. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Forster J. W. C. (2003). Biosorbents for Metal Ions. CRC Press; Available online at: https://books.google.co.zm/books?id=xlTBhuYbkC0C&lpg=PP1&ots=zCRdgIFEdB&dq=Biosorbents%20for%20Metal%20Ions.&lr&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q=Biosorbents%20for%20Metal%20Ions.&f=false [Google Scholar]
  34. Fu F., Wang Q. (2011). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J. Environ. Manage. 92 407–418. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fuwa K., Fukami M., Toda S. (1977). Uptake of heavy metals by a copper-tolerant fungus, penicillium ochro-chloron. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41 17–22. 10.1080/00021369.1977.10862460 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gadd G. M. (1993). Interactions of fungi with toxic metals. New Phytol. 124 25–60. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03796.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gulati R., Saxena R. K., Gupta R. (2002). Fermentation waste of Aspergillus terreus: a potential copper biosorbent. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18 397–401. 10.1023/A:1015540921432 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gupta R., Ahuja P., Khan S., Saxena R. K., Mohapatra H. (2000). Microbial biosorbents: meeting challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Curr. Sci. 78 967–973. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gupta V. G., Schmoll M., Herrera-Estrella A., Upadhyay R. S., Druzhinina I., Tuohy M. (2014). Biotechnology and biology of Trichoderma. Newnes: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  40. Harman G. E., Howell C. R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. (2004). Trichoderma species - opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2 43–56. 10.1038/nrmicro797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Harms H., Schlosser D., Wick L. Y. (2011). Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9 177–192. 10.1038/nrmicro2519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hong J. W., Park J. Y., Gadd G. M. (2010). Pyrene degradation and copper and zinc uptake by Fusarium solani and Hypocrea lixii isolated from petrol station soil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108 2030–2040. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04613.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Horsfall M., Spiff A. I. (2005). Effects of temperature on the sorption of Pb2+ and Cd 2+ from aqueous solution by caladium bicolor (Wild Cocoyam) biomass. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 8 162–169. 10.2225/vol8-issue2-fulltext-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang C., Huang C. P., Morehart A. L. (1991). Proton competition in Cu(II) adsorption by fungal mycelia. Water Res. 25 1365–1375. 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90115-90117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hussein H., Ibrahim S. F., Kandeel K., Moawad H. (2004). Biosorption of heavy metals from waste water using Pseudomonas sp. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 7 45–53. 10.2225/vol7-issue1-fulltext-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hymavathi D., Prabhakar G. (2017). Optimization, equilibrium, and kinetic studies of adsorptive removal of cobalt(II) from aqueous solutions using Cocos nucifera L. Chem. Eng. Commun. 204 1094–1104. 10.1080/00986445.2017.1338570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ianis M., Tsekova K., Vasileva S. (2006). Copper biosorption by penicillium cyclopium: equilibrium and modelling study. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 20 195–201. 10.1080/13102818.2006.10817332 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Igiri B. E., Okoduwa S. I. R., Idoko G. O., Akabuogu E. P., Adeyi A. O., Ejiogu I. K. (2018). Toxicity and bioremediation of heavy metals contaminated ecosystem from tannery wastewater?: a review. J. Toxicol. 2018:2568038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ikenaka Y., Nakayama S. M. M., Muzandu K., Choongo K. (2010). Heavy metal contamination of soil and sediment in Zambia. African J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4 729–739 10.4314/ajest.v4i11.71339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ilunga wa Ilunga E., Mahy G., Piqueray J., Séleck M., Shutcha M. N., Meerts P., et al. (2015). Plant functional traits as a promising tool for the ecological restoration of degraded tropical metal-rich habitats and revegetation of metal-rich bare soils: a case study in copper vegetation of Katanga, DRC. Ecol. Eng. 82 214–221. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Iram S., Shabbir R., Zafar H., Javaid M. (2015). Biosorption and Bioaccumulation of copper and lead by heavy metal-resistant fungal isolates. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40 1867–1873 10.1007/s13369-015-1702-1701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Iskandar N. L., Zainudin N. A. I. M., Tan S. G. (2011). Tolerance and biosorption of copper (Cu) and lead (Pb) by filamentous fungi isolated from a freshwater ecosystem. J. Environ. Sci. 23 824–830. 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60475-60475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ismail I., Moustafa T. (2016). Biosorption of heavy metals by bacteria isolated from activated sludge. Heavy Met. Sources, Toxic. Remediat. Tech. 91 131–174. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jayaraman M., Arumugam R. (2014). Biosorption of Copper (II) by Aspergillus flavus. Int. J. Sci. Res. 3 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  55. Johnson D. B. (2014). Biomining-biotechnologies for extracting and recovering metals from ores and waste materials. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 30 24–31. 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kapahi M., Sachdeva S. (2019). Bioremediation options for heavy metal pollution. J. Heal. Pollut. 9:191203. 10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kapoor A., Viraraghavan T., Cullimore D. R. (1999). Removal of heavy metals using the fungus Aspergillus niger. Bioresour. Technol. 70 95–104. 10.1016/s0960-8524(98)00192-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kapungwe E. M. (2013). Heavy metal contaminated food crops irrigated with wastewater in peri urban areas, Zambia. Open J. Met. 3 77–88. 10.4236/ojmetal.2013.32a1010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kipigroch K., Janosz-Rajczyk M., Skowron-Grabowska B. (2016). The use of algae in the removal of cd and cu in the process of wastewater recovery. Desalin. Water Treat. 57 1508–1514. 10.1080/19443994.2015.1043491 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kumari D., Pan X., Achal V., Zhang D., Al-Misned F. A., Golam Mortuza M. (2015). Multiple metal-resistant bacteria and fungi from acidic copper mine tailings of Xinjiang, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 74 3113–3121. 10.1007/s12665-015-4349-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lakshmi S., Krishna R., Lakshmi S., Krishna R. (2018). “Application of biosorption for for removal removal of heavy metals from wastewater,” in Biosorption, eds Derco J., Vrana B., (London: IntechOpen; ). [Google Scholar]
  62. Leenu S., Sheela D. (2016). Research article impact Of Co And Cu (Heavy Metals) on eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) solms, with special reference to bioaccumulation and phytoremediation’. Asian J. Sci. Technol. 7 2996–2998. [Google Scholar]
  63. Li F., Gao Z., Li X., Fang L. (2014). The effect of environmental factors on the uptake of 60Co by Paecilomyces catenlannulatus. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 299 1281–1286. 10.1007/s10967-013-2827-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Liang X., Gadd G. M. (2017). Metal and metalloid biorecovery using fungi. Microb. Biotechnol. 10 1199–1205. 10.1111/1751-7915.12767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lindahl J. (2014). Environmental Impacts of mining in Zambia, towards better environmental management and sustainable exploitation of mineral resources. Geol. Surv. 127. 10.1111/jicd.12105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. López Errasquín E., Vázquez C. (2003). Tolerance and uptake of heavy metals by Trichoderma atroviride isolated from sludge. Chemosphere 50 137–143. 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00485-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mathew B. B. Jaishankar M. Biju V. G. Krishnamurthy Nideghatta Beeregowda. (2016). Role of bioadsorbents in reducing toxic metals. J. Toxicol. 2016:4369604. 10.1155/2016/4369604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mehta S. K., Gaur J. P. (2005). Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: progress and prospects. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 25 113–152. 10.1080/07388550500248571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mohammadian E., Ahari A. B., Arzanlou M., Oustan S., Khazaei S. H. (2017). Tolerance to heavy metals in filamentous fungi isolated from contaminated mining soils in the Zanjan Province, Iran. Chemosphere 185 290–296. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. More T. T., Yan S., Tyagi R. D., Surampalli R. Y. (2010). Potential use of filamentous fungi for wastewater sludge treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 101 7691–7700. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mugo T., Town C. (2013). Assessment of Water Pollution Arising from Copper Mining in Zambia: A Case Study of Munkulungwe Stream in Ndola, Copperbelt Province. Available online at: https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/27984 (accessed June 23, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  72. Mwaanga P., Silondwa M., Kasali G., Banda P. M. (2019). Preliminary review of mine air pollution in Zambia. Heliyon 5:e02485. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nakayama S. M. M., Ikenaka Y., Muzandu K., Choongo K., Oroszlany B., Teraoka H., et al. (2010). Heavy metal accumulation in lake sediments, fish (Oreochromis niloticus and Serranochromis thumbergi), and crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) in lake itezhi-tezhi and lake Kariba, Zambia. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 59 291–300. 10.1007/s00244-010-9483-9488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Narendrula-Kotha R., Nkongolo K. K. (2017). Bacterial and fungal community structure and diversity in a mining region under long-term metal exposure revealed by metagenomics sequencing. Ecol. Genet. Genom. 2 13–24. 10.1016/j.egg.2016.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Naveena J., Latha L. (2018). Fungal cell walls as protective barriers for toxic metals. Adv. Med. Biol. 53:19. [Google Scholar]
  76. Nongmaithem N., Roy A., Bhattacharya P. M. (2016). Screening of trichoderma isolates for their potential of biosorption of nickel and cadmium. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 47 305–313. 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Oladipo O. G., Awotoye O. O., Olayinka A., Bezuidenhout C. C., Maboeta M. S. (2018). Heavy metal tolerance traits of filamentous fungi isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 49 29–37. 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ozsoy H. D. (2010). Biosorptive removal of Hg(II) ions by Rhizopus oligosporus produced from corn-processing wastewater. African J. Biotechnol. 9 8783–8790. 10.5897/AJB10.530 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pal A., Ghosh S., Paul A. K. (2006). Biosorption of cobalt by fungi from serpentine soil of Andaman. Bioresour. Technol. 97 1253–1258. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Pal T. K., Basumajumdar A. (2002). Biosorption of heavy metals by Rhizopus arrhizus and Aspergillus niger. J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 79?: 747–750.. [Google Scholar]
  81. Paraneeiswaran A., Shukla S. K., Subba Rao T., Prashanth K. (2014). Removal of toxic Co-EDTA complex by a halophilic solar-salt-pan isolate Pseudomonas aeruginosa SPB-1. Chemosphere 95 503–510. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Preetha B., Viruthagiri T. (2007). Application of response surface methodology for the biosorption of copper using Rhizopus arrhizus. J. Hazard. Mater. 143 506–510. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Qayyum S., Meng K., Pervez S., Nawaz F., Peng C. (2019). Optimization of pH, temperature and carbon source for bioleaching of heavy metals by Aspergillus flavus isolated from contaminated soil. Main Gr. Met. Chem. 42 1–7. 10.1515/mgmc-2018-2038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Raftos D., Radford J. (2002). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by tunicates. Int. J. Environ. Chem. 14 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rao D. V., Shivannavar C. T., Gaddad S. M. (2002). Bioleaching of copper from chalcopyrite ore by fungi. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 40 319–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Rashmi K., Sowjanya T. N., Mohan P. M., Balaji V., Venkateswaran G. (2004). Bioremediation of 60Co from simulated spent decontamination solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 328 1–14. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Romero M. C., Reinoso H. E., Urrutia M. I., Moreno Kiernan A. (2006). Biosorption of heavy metals by Talaromyces helicus: a trained fungus for copper and biphenyl detoxification. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 9 10.2225/vol9-issue3-fulltext-11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Saad A. M., Saad M. M., Ibrahim N. A., El-Hadedy D., Ibrahim E. I., El-Din A. Z. K., et al. (2019). Evaluation of Aspergillus tamarii NRC 3 biomass as a biosorbent for removal and recovery of heavy metals from contaminated aqueous solutions. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 43:10 10.1186/s42269-019-0046-45 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Shah M. P., Vora S. B., Dave S. R. (1999). Evaluation of potential use of immobilized Penicillium griseofulvum in bioremoval of copper. Process Metall. 9 2004–2007. 10.1016/S1572-4409(99)80112-80116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Shah S. S., Palmieri M. C., Sponchiado S. R. P., Bevilaqua D. (2020). Enhanced bio-recovery of aluminum from low-grade bauxite using adapted fungal strains. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 51 1909–1918. 10.1007/s42770-020-00342-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sharma S., Kour D., Rana K. L., Dhiman A., Thakur S., Thakur P., et al. (2019). Trichoderma: biodiversity, ecological significances, and industrial applications,” in Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi, Diversity and Enzymes Perspectives, eds Yadav A. N., Mishra S., Singh S., Gupta A., (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 85–120. 10.1007/978-3-030-10480-1_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Shukla D., Vankar P. S. (2014). Role of trichoderma species in bioremediation process: biosorption studies on hexavalent chromium. Biotechnol. Biol. Trichoderma 2014 405–412. 10.1016/B978-0-444-59576-8.00030-38 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Siddiquee S., Aishah S. N., Azad S. A., Shafawati S. N., Naher L. (2013). Tolerance and biosorption capacity of Zn2+, Pb2+, Ni3+ and Cu2+ by filamentous fungi (Trichoderma harzianum, T. aureoviride and T. virens). Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 4 570–583. 10.4236/abb.2013.44075 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Siddiquee S., Rovina K., Azad S. A. (2015). Heavy metal contaminants removal from wastewater using the potential filamentous fungi biomass: a review. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 7 384–393. 10.4172/1948-5948.1000243 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Siegel S. M., Siegel B. Z., Clark K. E. (1983). Bio-corrosion: solubilization and accumulation of metals by fungi. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 19 229–236. 10.1007/BF00599050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Simonescu C. M., Ferdeş M. (2012). Fungal biomass for cu(II) uptake from aqueous systems. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 21 1831–1839. [Google Scholar]
  97. Somers E. (1963). The uptake of copper by fungal cells. Ann. Appl. Biol. 51 425–437. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1963.tb03710.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Staniland S., Coppock M., Tuffin M., van Zyl L., Roychoudhury A. N., Cowan D. (2010). Cobalt uptake and resistance to trace metals in comamonas testosteroni isolated from a heavy-metal contaminated site in the zambian copperbelt. Geomicrobiol. J. 27 656–668. 10.1080/01490450903527994 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Suhasini I. P., Sriram G., Asolekar S. R., Sureshkumar G. K. (1999). Biosorptive removal and recovery of cobalt from aqueous systems. Process Biochem. 34 239–247. 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00090-99 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sutton N. B., Maphosa F., Morillo J. A., Al-Soud W. A., Langenhoff A. A. M., Grotenhuis T., et al. (2013). Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 619–630. 10.1128/AEM.02747-2712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Syakalima M., Choongo K., Nakazato Y., Onuma M., Sugimoto C., Tsubota T., et al. (2001). An investigation of heavy metal exposure and risks to wildlife in the kafue flats of zambia. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63 315–318. 10.1292/jvms.63.315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Taştan B. E., Ertugrul S., Dönmez G. (2010). Effective bioremoval of reactive dye and heavy metals by Aspergillus versicolor. Bioresour. Technol. 101 870–876. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Ting A. S. Y., Choong C. C. (2009). Bioaccumulation and biosorption efficacy of Trichoderma isolate SP2F1 in removing copper (Cu(II)) from aqueous solutions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25 1431–1437. 10.1007/s11274-009-0030-36 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Tobin J. M., Cooper D. G., Neufeld R. J. (1987). Influence of anions on metal adsorption by Rhizopus arrhizus biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30 882–886. 10.1002/bit.260300711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Townsley C. C., Ross I. S. (1985). Copper uptake by Penicillium spinulosum. Microbios 44 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tsekova K., Ianis M., Ganeva S. (2007). Biosorption of binary mixtures of copper and cobalt by Penicillium cyclopium biomass. Comptes Rendus L’Academie Bulg. des Sci. 60 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Tsekova K., Todorova D. (2002). Copper (II) accumulation and superoxide dismutase activity during growth of Aspergillus niger B-77. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 57 319–322. 10.1515/znc-2002-3-421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tsekova K. V. (2000). Copper accumulation by Aspergillus awamori. Folia Microbio 45 217–220. 10.1007/bf02908947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Vafajoo L., Cheraghi R., Dabbagh R., McKay G. (2018). Removal of cobalt (II) ions from aqueous solutions utilizing the pre-treated 2-Hypnea valentiae algae: equilibrium, thermodynamic, and dynamic studies. Chem. Eng. J. 331 39–47. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Vannela R., Verma S. K. (2006). Co2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ accumulation by cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. Biotechnol. Prog. 22 1282–1293. 10.1021/bp060075s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wang J., Chen C. (2009). Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol. Adv. 27 195–226. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Xie X., Fu J., Wang H., Liu J. (2010). Heavy metal resistance by two bacteria strains isolated from a copper mine tailing in China. African J. Biotechnol. 9 4056–4066. 10.5897/AJB2010.000-3286 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Xu X., Zhang Z., Huang Q., Chen W. (2018). Biosorption performance of multimetal resistant fungus Penicillium chrysogenum XJ-1 for removal of Cu2+ and Cr6+ from aqueous solutions. Geomicrobiol. J. 35 40–49. 10.1080/01490451.2017.1310331 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Yazdani M., Yap C. K., Abdullah F., Tan S. G. (2009). Trichoderma atroviride as a bioremediator of Cu pollution: an in vitro study. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 91 1305–1314. 10.1080/02772240802616510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Yedidia I., Benhamou N., Chet I. (1999). Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the Biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 1061–1070. 10.1128/aem.65.3.1061-1070.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Yin Y., Hu Y., Xiong F. (2011). Sorption of Cu(II) and Cd(II) by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from Aspergillus fumigatus. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 65 1012–1018. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Zafar S., Aqil F., Ahmad I. (2007). Metal tolerance and biosorption potential of filamentous fungi isolated from metal contaminated agricultural soil. Bioresour. Technol. 98 2557–2561. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES