Abstract
Understanding whether organisms will be able to adapt to human-induced stressors currently endangering their existence is an urgent priority. Globally, multiple species moult from a dark summer to white winter coat to maintain camouflage against snowy landscapes. Decreasing snow cover duration owing to climate change is increasing mismatch in seasonal camouflage. To directly test for adaptive responses to recent changes in snow cover, we repeated historical (1950s) field studies of moult phenology in mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in Scotland. We found little evidence that population moult phenology has shifted to align seasonal coat colour with shorter snow seasons, or that phenotypic plasticity prevented increases in camouflage mismatch. The lack of responses resulted in 35 additional days of mismatch between 1950 and 2016. We emphasize the potential role of weak directional selection pressure and low genetic variability in shaping the scope for adaptive responses to anthropogenic stressors.
Keywords: adaptation, climate change, historical resurvey, phenological mismatch, phenotypic plasticity, snow
1. Introduction
Recent climate change has already subjected wild populations to large changes in environmental conditions [1]. Failure of populations to sufficiently track these changes will result in local declines and extinctions [2,3]. Some populations have responded adaptively via phenotypic plasticity and/or evolution [4–7]. However, others have failed to track climate change or seem to have responded in non-adaptive ways [8–10]. Predicting population responses to climate change remains challenging, in part because many interacting factors determine future trajectories of inherently complex natural systems [11]. Yet, understanding whether and how populations will respond to climate change is one of the most urgent challenges facing biologists [12].
In response to climate change, snow cover duration is decreasing in many parts of the Northern Hemisphere [13,14], and consequently imposing changing and potentially novel selection pressures on organisms adapted to seasonally changing environments [15]. A diverse group of birds and mammals moult from summer dark to winter white coat annually to increase crypsis against snow [16,17]. While weather, especially temperature, can fine tune the phenology of those moults each year, changing daylength is the principal driver of the moults across taxa [16,18]. As snow duration declines owing to climate change, colour moulting species become increasingly mismatched with their background [19]. Field studies indicate that mismatch in seasonal coat colour and snow presence or absence has negative individual and population consequences via increased predator-induced mortality [20–25]. For example, snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) experience 7–14% decreased weekly survival when mismatched against their background [23,24]. Given this strong selection against mismatch, persistence of colour moulting species will require adaptation to future changes in global snow cover [26,27].
Climate-mediated phenotypic plasticity, described in several colour moulting species, can, theoretically, buffer against camouflage mismatch [16,19]. However, previous studies that investigated plasticity in response to climate change showed that current levels of plasticity are insufficient to prevent mismatch; snowshoe hares and least weasels (Mustela nivalis) became mismatched during years with fewer days of snow cover [18,19,22,28]. This suggests that adaptive evolution of moult phenology and/or moult plasticity—evolutionary rescue [27,29]—may be crucial for the persistence of colour moulting species. Whether evolutionary shifts in moult phenology (e.g. shifts in the photoperiodic response) or plasticity (e.g. shifts in the sensitivity to temperature) can occur is unknown. However, existing intrapopulation variation in moult phenology and strong selection favouring cryptic coloration suggest evolutionary rescue is possible [23,30].
Historical phenological studies provide some of the only opportunities to test whether organisms have already responded to climate change. Unfortunately, such datasets are extremely rare for moult phenology. Fortunately, Watson [31] and Flux [32] described seasonal moult of wild mountain hares (Lepus timidus scoticus) in the northeast and central highlands of Scotland over spring and autumn seasons during the 1950s and 1960s. To our knowledge, this effort represents the longest-running systematic historical survey of moult phenology in any species. These studies documented intrapopulation variation in hares' moult phenology each year and population-level phenotypic plasticity in response to ambient temperature, especially in the spring [31,32]. The adaptive capacity of mountain hares to mitigate camouflage mismatch via phenotypic plasticity is unknown, however. Similarly, the selective costs of camouflage mismatch in the highly managed Scottish Highlands have not been investigated; but based on insights gained from the study of other populations [33] and other colour moulting species [22,23], extant Scottish mountain hares may have avoided increases in camouflage mismatch via adaptive shifts in response to widespread reductions in snow cover [34].
In this study, we assessed the potential of a wild population of a common, seasonally colour moulting species to adaptively track climate change. We took advantage of the detailed historical surveys of mountain hare moult phenology in the Scottish Highlands to examine population responses to decreasing snow cover over the past 65 years. First, we quantified current population mean moult phenologies and tested whether they have shifted since the 1950s. We hypothesized that mountain hares should have shifted moult phenologies in ways that reduce camouflage mismatch by moulting to white winter fur later in the autumn and to brown summer fur earlier in the spring. Second, we quantified population-level phenotypic plasticity to examine whether it contributes to any potential shifts in mean phenology. Third, we quantified historical and present-day frequency of mismatch as measures of species vulnerability to future environmental change. We end with general conclusions on some key considerations when predicting adaptive responses of wild populations to climate change.
2. Methods
(a). Study areas
Historical surveys were carried out at six sites in the northeast and central highlands of Scotland, UK, from 1951 to the end of 1961 [31,32]. We were unable to resurvey the same sites owing to changes in land management, access restrictions to private land and loss of mountain hares from some historic sites [35]. We, therefore, surveyed different sites with comparable topography, land management practices and vegetation type. The current sites were located in the upland areas of the northeast and central highlands of Scotland and spanned a similar elevational range as the historical sites (table 1; electronic supplementary material, table S1). All historic and current sites were dominated by dwarf heath and subalpine plant communities, common vegetation type of the Scottish uplands and represent the habitat type preferred by mountain hares in the geographical area [36].
Table 1.
Historical and present study sites in northeast and central Scotland, average elevation at the sites in metres above sea level, years when surveys were carried out, latitude and longitude.
| region | site | elev. | survey years | lat. | long. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| historic surveys | |||||
| Angus Glens | Glen Esk high | 610 | 1957–1961 | 56.957 | −2.839 |
| Angus Glens | Glen Esk low | 270 | 1957–1961 | 56.943 | −2.835 |
| Deeside/Strathdon | Corndavon | 450 | 1951, 1955, 1957–1959 | 57.068 | −3.234 |
| Deeside/Strathdon | Glen Muick | 380 | 1958–1959 | 57.022 | −3.046 |
| Deeside/Strathdon | Punchbowl | 310 | 1957–1959 | 56.860 | −2.730 |
| Deeside/Strathdon | Roar Hill | 450 | 1958–1959 | 57.129 | −2.999 |
| current surveys | |||||
| Highland | Findhorn high | 640 | 2016 | 57.235 | −4.136 |
| Highland | Findhorn low | 430 | 2016 | 57.206 | −4.102 |
| Deeside/Strathdon | Lecht | 730 | 2015–2016 | 57.193 | −3.240 |
(b). Field surveys
We followed the original historical field survey methods [31,32]; one surveyor walked along a predetermined route (ca 3–6 km long). Hares were detected as they were either flushed (moved) in response to the surveyor or in reaction to other hares, or less frequently, as the surveyor thoroughly scanned the surroundings with binoculars. Hares are largely inactive during the day and the majority of hares were detected as they flushed. Our experience and that reported in the literature is that hares tend not to flush until an observer is very close to them, or unless disturbed by other fleeing hares; therefore, the large majority of detections were within less than 50 m of the observer [37]. For all hares detected within 200 m of the observer which provided a clear view that allowed coat colour to be assessed, we recorded coat colour (described below). Surveys were repeated twice a month (October–January and March–June) for a total of 5–11 surveys per season in 2016 at the two Findhorn sites and 2015 and 2016 at the Lecht site, giving eight year–season–site combinations (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Surveys were always undertaken in clear and dry conditions so as to reduce the possible effects of weather on detecting hares. The risk of repeat observations of the same individuals within a survey was minimized by visually monitoring flushed individuals as far as possible. Each survey was completed within a single 4–5 h session.
(c). Moult phenology
We recorded, and where possible photographed, the coat colour for each observed hare using the moult score protocol developed by Watson [31]. Each hare was ranked in one of five colour categories; DD (completely dark), D (mostly dark), LD (half-dark and half-white), L (mostly white) or LL (completely white) by the surveyor. Observations accompanied by photographs (greater than 80%) were later verified by a single observer (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Historical surveys at one site used a slightly different method [32] to determine the five colour categories (=colour was scored independently for seven body parts and averaged), but interchangeability of the two scoring methods was confirmed by the site's observer (J. Flux 2015, personal communication) and by agreement with records from similar dates and sites [31]. Finally, to reduce potential bias between observers and to simplify parameter estimation, we reduced the initial five categories into three: white (LL, L), moulting (LD) and brown (D, DD) for all analyses (electronic supplementary material, figure S1).
(d). Statistical analyses
We used R (v. 3.5.2; R Core Team 2016) for all statistical analyses.
(i). Climate variables and analysis
To characterize climate in the study region, we calculated temperature and snow cover variables over the past 65 years. The mean seasonal temperature, tavg was calculated for each year from 1950 to 2016 using gridded 5 × 5 km resolution monthly average temperature (Met Office UKCP09) [38] at each study site. The seasons were defined as spring (1 March–31 May) and autumn (1 September–30 November) and encompassed the main periods when hares underwent moults. Days with snow cover (snow days) were summed for each season of each year; for 1960–2011, snow days were those days when snow cover was present at a site (snow water equivalent greater than 0 mm) based on daily gridded 5 × 5 km resolution data [39]. Because this dataset became unavailable after 2011, for 2012–2016, snow days were defined by days when snow cover was present at a site (grid cells were greater than 50% snow covered) based on daily 1.5 × 1.5 km resolution data [40]. We combined the two snow datasets to span the entire period of interest and verified the compatibility of the two datasets by comparing the period of overlap (2000–2011; electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Next, we calculated for each year and site 25th percentile of snow days in the autumn and 75th percentile of snow days in the spring, as indices for early autumn and late spring snow days, respectively. Lastly, we calculated the number of transitions as the number of changes between snow cover presence and absence at each site by summing the number of times snow days were followed by days without snow and vice versa each year and season. The resulting number of transitions is a measure of environmental stochasticity with snow cover repeatedly falling and melting multiple times during each season. All snow variables were calculated for the main snowfall periods in Scotland; spring snowfall (1 March–31 May), autumn snowfall (1 October–31 December) and autumn-to-spring snowfall period (snow season, 1 October–31 May).
Although high-resolution snow data do not exist for Great Britain prior to 1960, we assumed that the 1950s data were comparable to the 1960s and used the 1960s data as a proxy to calculate historical mismatch. We validated this assumption by comparing number of snow days during 1951–1960 and 1961–1970 which were collected during the Snow Survey of Great Britain [41]. Only records from stations lying within 40 km of any of our study sites and that recorded daily snow cover for at least 6 years during both decades (n = 7) were included in the comparison. We found no difference between the number of snow days during the entire snow season (here referring to the period 1 October–31 May) between the two decades using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuity correction (p = 0.45, W = 1684).
Changes in mean temperature, number of snow days, number of snow transitions and timing of early autumn and late spring snow were quantified using mixed effects models. The mean seasonal temperature, number of snow days, number of transitions and the 25th or 75th percentile snow dates were used as response variables, year as a fixed effect and site as a random effect using the lmer function from the lme4 [42] package in R [43].
(ii). Moult phenology
We developed a hierarchical multinomial logistic regression analysis within a Bayesian framework to describe moult phenology and its phenotypic plasticity [18]. For all models, we estimated the probability of a hare colour y being in colour category i at site j on a Julian day d as
Coat colour was treated as a categorical variable, such that a hare on day d was either brown (pbrown), white (pwhite) or moulting (pmoult) and Σ(p1:3, j,d) = 1. Site was coded as a random covariate si,j to reflect the hierarchical structure of the dataset and admit repeat measures. αi was the intercept and β1i was the effect of Julian day on the probability of being either brown, white or moulting. Autumn and spring moults were modelled separately. Hereafter, we refer to this model without additional covariates as the basic model.
To compare moult phenology between the time periods, we combined colour observations from all years and sites in one dataset and added a fixed effect of time period β2i (1950s or 2010s) on the probability of being in a certain colour category to the basic model. We used the estimated probabilities to derive approximate dates when hares initiated and completed the moults as ‘initiation’ and ‘completion’ dates during each time period. Autumn initiation was specified as the first Julian day when the mean pbrown < 0.9 and completion date when the mean pwhite > 0.9; the opposite condition was used to estimate the spring dates (i.e. initiationd pwhite < 0.9 and completiond pbrown > 0.9).
Next, we investigated the role of phenotypic plasticity in moult phenology in response to ambient temperature. Because ambient temperature is thought to moderate mountain hare moult phenology [31,32], and thereby improve a model's ability to detect differences between time periods, we constructed an additional set of models with temperature as an additional covariate (tavgj,e). tavgj,e was the average seasonal temperature at site j during year e and was added as a fixed effect β3i to the basic model containing time period β2i described above. We standardized tavg to have a mean of 0 and s.d. of 1. Additionally, to explicitly test the effect of tavg, we constructed a univariate model with a single fixed effect β3i (tavgj,e). The resulting β3i coefficients were the slopes of reaction norms of the probabilities of being brown (β3brown) or white (β3white) on tavg.
For all models, we obtained posterior distributions of all parameters along with their 95% credible intervals (CRI) using Markov chain Monte Carlo implemented in JAGS (v. 4.0.1), which we called using the R2jags package [44]. Model convergence was assessed using the Gelman–Rubin statistic, where values less than 1.1 indicated convergence [45]. We generated three chains of 300 000 iterations after a burn-in of 150 000 iterations and thinned by three. Parameters αi, β1i and β3i received a vague prior of N(0, 0.001), while β2i and the standard deviation of random effect si,j received uniform priors of U(−10, 10) and U(0, 100), respectively.
(iii). Phenotypic mismatch
To examine the occurrence of mismatch between hare winter coat colour and snow-free ground between 1951 and 2016, we calculated the number of days of mismatch at each site each year and season. Mismatch occurred on days when hares were white and snow was absent at each site. We defined white hares when the mean pwhite > 0.6 based on the basic model, as this threshold would include completely (LL) and mostly white (L) hares (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) and is consistent with previous studies [18,19]. To test for increase in the mismatch over the 60+ years of climate change, we ran a univariate linear mixed model with mismatch days as the response variable, year as a fixed effect and site as a random effect. Finally, to explore the sensitivity of the definition of white threshold, we repeated the analysis with an alternative threshold at mean pwhite > 0.9.
3. Results
(a). Climate change
Temperature increased and snow cover duration decreased for all sites and seasons over the 1950–2016 period, while snow stochasticity did not change. Seasonal average temperature (tavg) increased by a mean (±s.d.) of 0.17 (±0.018)°C decade−1 during spring and 0.13 (±0.016)°C decade−1 during autumn (p ≪ 0.001; electronic supplementary material, figure S3). This led to increases in average seasonal temperature of 1.15°C in the spring and 0.84°C in the autumn between 1950 and 2016. The number of snow days decreased during both seasons by a mean of −2.79 (±0.33) days decade−1 in spring, and −1.72 (±0.30) days decade−1 in autumn (p ≪ 0.001; electronic supplementary material, figure S4) and by a mean of −6.52 (±0.68) snow days decade−1 for the entire snow season (p ≪ 0.001; figure 1). This led to an average decline of 37.14 days of annual snow cover at our sites between 1960 and 2016. Next, we found that the mean date of early autumn snow occurs about 4 days later (0.069 ± 0.033 days, p = 0.038) and the late spring snow now occurs about 7 days earlier (−0.12 ± 0.039, p = 0.0031) since the 1960s (electronic supplementary material, figure S6). Finally, we found no change in stochasticity of snow, measured by the number of transitions between bare ground and snow cover during the entire snow season (β = −0.018, s.e. = 0.014, p = 0.17) or autumn seasons (β = −0.0075, s.e. = 0.0078, p = 0.33). In the spring, there was a significant decrease in the number of transitions (β = −0.029, s.e. = 0.0063, p ≪ 0.001), although this effect size is small (1.63 fewer transitions between 1960 and 2016), probably owing to the confounding effect of the decreasing number of springtime snow days (electronic supplementary material, figures S4 and S5).
Figure 1.
Number of snow days during the autumn- and spring snowfall season at the study sites between 1960 and 2016. Coloured lines show linear regression slopes for each site with 95% confidence intervals depicted in grey. Solid (dashed) lines indicate sites used in current (historical) surveys. (Online version in colour.)
(b). Moult phenology
We did not detect any significant shifts in spring or autumn moult phenology between 1951 and 2016 (table 2a,b). The effect of the time period covariate on the probabilities of being brown (β2brown) or white (β2white) overlapped zero for both seasons in models with (table 2b), or without seasonal temperature (tavg; table 2a, figure 2). Next, mean population moult initiation dates did not differ significantly between moult phenology of the 1950s and 2010s in spring or autumn as indicated by the overlapping 95% CRI (figure 2); hares initiate autumn moults in late October (mean Julian date = 296) and spring moults around mid-March (mean Julian day = 78). Similarly, the estimated completion dates have not changed between the two time periods for either season with spring moults completing in mid-May (mean Julian day = 135) and autumn moults in mid-December (mean Julian day = 345; figure 2).
Table 2.
Absence of shifts in moult phenology from 1951 to 2016 and some phenotypic plasticity in mountain hares in the highlands of Scotland in autumn and spring. (Mean effect sizes and 95% credible intervals (CRI) estimates for slopes for models including (a) time period only, (b) time period and seasonal average temperature (tavg), and (c) tavg only. β2i indicates the effect of time period and β3i indicates the effect of seasonal temperature tavg on the probability of brown (β3brown) and white (β3white). Asterisks indicate CRIs not overlapping zero.)
| (a) | Pr(y = i) = αi + β1i × day + β2i × time periodj + si,j | ||||
| moult season | β2brown | β2white | |||
| autumn | −0.62 (−2.12, 0.89) | 0.62 (−0.26, 1.56) | |||
| spring | −0.23 (−0.83, 0.35) | 0.01 (−1.00, 1.00) | |||
| (b) | Pr(y = i) = αi + β1i × day + β2i × time periodj + β3i × tavgj,e + si,j | ||||
| moult season | β2brown | β2white | β3brown | β3white | |
| autumn | −0.34 (−1.68, 1.00) | 0.06 (−0.68, 0.92) | 0.25 (−0.05, 0.54) | −0.46* (−0.71, −0.20) | |
| spring | −0.37 (−1.56, 0.60) | −0.05 (−1.30, 0.93) | 1.00* (0.87, 1.14) | −0.78* (−0.92, −0.64) | |
| (c) | Pr(y = i) = αi + β1i × day + β3i × tavgj,e + si,j | ||||
| moult season | β3brown | β3white | |||
| autumn | 0.270 (−0.018, 0.554) | −0.456* (−0.676, −0.288) | |||
| spring | 1.005* (0.870, 1.144) | −0.766* (−0.906, −0.627) | |||
Figure 2.
Similar mean mountain hare moult phenologies during 1950s and 2010s in the highlands of Scotland. Solid lines depict predicted probabilities of being white over time based on the basic model including seasonal average temperature tavg. The shaded areas and dashed lines show 95% credible intervals (CRI) and the perpendicular hash marks along the x-axis depict survey dates, colour coded for each time period. Photographs show mountain hares when probability of being in white pelage is 100% (left) and 0% (right). Dates above plots indicate the mean initiation and completion dates and CRIs. (Online version in colour.)
We found evidence for phenotypic plasticity in response to annual variation in temperature tavg (table 2b,c). In the spring, the effect of tavg (β3i) was significant, indicating that moults were delayed during colder springs. This resulted in up to a 20 day difference in the mean population completion dates between some springs. In the autumn, tavg had a significant effect only on the probability of being white (β3white, table 2c), with non-significant shifts towards earlier initiation and completion of the moult during colder autumns.
(c). Phenotypic mismatch
Estimated mismatch in coat colour increased between 1950 and 2016 at all sites and seasons. The increases were steepest over the entire snow season (1 October–31 May) (βYear = 0.52, p ≪ 0.001) and evident when moulting seasons were considered separately (autumn βYear = 0.14, p ≪ 0.001; spring βYear = 0.18, p ≪ 0.001; figure 3). Since the 1960s, from when gridded snow data are available, the regression slopes translate to 29.7 more days with white hares (mean pwhite > 60%) against snowless background than in the 2010s, with an additional 5.2 days when data are extrapolated to the 1950s (figure 3b). Across all the sites, the mean number mismatch days increased from 44.3 (s.d. = 24.8) days during 1950s and 1960s to 69.9 (s.d. = 30.1) during the 2010s (figure 3a). The results were similar when an alternative mismatch threshold (=mean pwhite > 90%) was used (electronic supplementary material, table S2).
Figure 3.
Estimated number of days when white mountain hares would be found mismatched against snowless background from 1950 to 2016 in the highlands of Scotland. The number of mismatch days is calculated over the entire snow season (1 October–31 May) for each year. (a) Boxplots show the number of mismatch days in the 1950s and 2010s. Horizontal lines within the boxes denote the medians, boxes the first and third quartiles, whiskers extend to the largest and smallest value within 1.5 × the interquartile range and the point represents an outlier. (b) Coloured lines show linear regression slopes for each site with 95% confidence intervals depicted in grey. Solid (dashed) lines indicate sites used in current (historical) surveys. (Online version in colour.)
4. Discussion
Across the northeast and central highlands of Scotland seasonal temperatures have increased and the number of snow days has declined since the 1950s; a trend seen across the Northern Hemisphere [13,14]. Despite the directionality and large magnitude of the observed climate shift documented here, our results suggest that moult phenology did not track the shortening snow seasons to prevent camouflage mismatch. Further, temperature-mediated phenotypic plasticity in moult phenology was detectable, but insufficient to prevent camouflage mismatch. Altogether, this resulted in 35 additional days of phenotypic mismatch whereby mostly white hares inhabited snowless backgrounds. As snow cover is expected to decline by up to additional 50% by 2100 across Scotland [34], mountain hares in the Scottish uplands are very likely to experience further phenotypic mismatch in the future.
The lack of sufficient adaptive phenological responses in mountain hares was unexpected for two main reasons. First, phenotypic plasticity has been commonly documented across taxa in a range of traits [46,47] and some plasticity in moult phenology has been observed in several seasonally colour moulting species [16,18,28]. Yet, the observed levels of plasticity were apparently insufficient to prevent increases in camouflage mismatch—a finding consistent with field studies of snowshoe hares over shorter time periods [18,28,48]. Second, strong natural selection against camouflage mismatch has been documented in other colour moulting species [22–24] and negative population consequences of mismatch were found in mountain hares in Norway [33]. Therefore, evolutionary shifts in moult phenologies are a plausible, if not expected, response to reduced snow cover. Given that these two components of adaptive capacity are so widely observed, our results provide a striking contrast to evidence for adaptive shifts observed in other systems [22,23,27]. Multiple factors may have contributed to the lack of shifts in moult phenology in mountain hares. In the next paragraphs, we discuss the potential contributions of environmental stochasticity, potentially low genetic variance and attenuation of selection pressure against camouflage mismatch in Scotland. We also discuss how the increasing duration of camouflage mismatch in mountain hares might influence these populations in the future.
Adaptive tracking of decreasing snow cover could be slowed or stalled if temporally varying selection pressures prevent the generation of stable optimal phenotypes via phenotypic plasticity or evolutionary adaptation [49,50]. The climate of Scotland's highlands is extremely variable and unpredictable in time and space, subjecting mountain hares to high environmental stochasticity. Although temperature exerts major control over snow cover and depth in Scotland, snowfall is often associated with frontal systems and a cold winter does not necessarily mean a snowy one [51]. Indeed, hares experience high variability in snow cover during each winter, with an average of 14.2 snow cover transitions per winter during our study period. However, the high stochasticity in climate has not increased over the past 60 or more years (electronic supplementary material, figure S5), so environmental stochasticity seems unlikely to be a primary inhibitor of recent adaptive responses.
For moult phenology or its plasticity to evolve by natural selection, sufficient heritable genetic variation must exist in the trait and population must be large enough that selection is not overwhelmed by genetic drift [52,53]. Circannual phenological traits often have a heritable basis [54,55], and the genetic basis for winter colour per se (i.e. winter dark versus white morphs) has been determined for some populations of snowshoe hares [56] and mountain hares [57]. The genetic basis, and response to selection, of moult timing and rate (phenology) has not yet been described, but is similarly likely to be affected by genetic architecture, gene expression and the disruptive effect of genetic drift in small populations [58–60]. Genetic drift owing to small population size may be relevant in this case because recent (i.e. since 1990s) population reductions have been reported for some areas in the northeast and central highlands of Scotland [35,61]. Furthermore, although genetic variation in Scotland populations is unknown, some evidence suggests it is lower than in other mountain hare populations in Europe [62,63]. However, without better information on genetic variance in Scottish hares, we cannot infer whether it might have contributed to the lack of response in moult phenology.
We believe a primary contributing factor for the apparent lack of phenological shifts in mountain hares in Scotland is attenuation of selection pressure. Natural selection for cryptic coloration is one of the strongest drivers of adaptive evolution [64,65], with examples including peppered moths (Biston betularia) in Great Britain [66], mice inhabiting light-coloured substrates [67], and seasonal colour moults in birds and mammals [16]. However, relaxed selection (i.e. reduced effect of phenotypic trait on fitness) can lead to a loss of functional traits or diminished phenotypic plasticity [68,69]. The main adaptive advantage of the winter white moult is predator avoidance (thermoregulatory properties are overwhelmingly controlled by changes in hair length and density, not hair colour; Zimova et al. [16]). Therefore, evolutionary shifts in moult timing would require directional selection imposed by predation.
In Scotland, mountain hares are prey for a range of species including red fox (Vulpes vulpes), wild cat (Felis silvestris), otter (Lutra lutra) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) [70,71]. However, in the northeast and central highlands of Scotland, mountain hares are associated with heather-dominated moorlands managed for commercial shooting of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus) [36,72]. Predator numbers and diversity are severely depressed across these lands owing to legal and illegal predator control over the last century [61,73,74]. Thus, the relatively low predator-induced mismatch costs would be expected to relax natural selection against mismatch in these areas relative to regions with more intact predator communities such as in Norway [33] or Montana, USA [23]. Given the highly altered selection regime on intensively managed moorlands, camouflage mismatch might have little-to-no fitness costs for mountain hares in our study system, now and in the recent past.
If attenuated predation risk is the main contributing factor to what we suggest is a relatively static moult phenology, we expect that a return of predation pressure could lead to negative population consequences. For example, if generalist predators were to increase in response to land use or policy changes, the accumulated duration of camouflage mismatch could threaten hare population persistence. This ‘latent maladaptation’ is, therefore, worth considering when assessing the species vulnerability to climate and land use change [35,75]. Irrespective of any potential increase in predator numbers, we recommend management efforts that favour evolutionary rescue (i.e. large connected populations that harbour high genetic diversity; [27,29]) to achieve evolutionary resilience and long-term persistence in the face of future biotic and abiotic changes [76]. This recommendation is especially relevant for the mountain hare populations in the northeast and central highlands of Scotland, where there is evidence of local population declines [35,61] and additional stressors related to game bird management and woodland/forestry expansion [77,78].
Two potential limitations of our study are worth noting. First, for analyses, we collapsed moult observations into three categories, which may decrease resolution of initiation and completion dates. Second, we only had 2 years of ‘current’ hare moult phenology, making it difficult to eliminate the possibility of plasticity in moult phenology that may manifest at other temperatures. Future studies that include additional years and sites of observations will help elucidate Scottish mountain hares' capacity to respond to a wider range of conditions under current and future climate.
For at least 21 species across the Northern Hemisphere, seasonal coat colour has been shaped directly by climate [27]. The general consensus is that as decreasing snow duration continues to cause winter white animals to be found against dark snowless backgrounds, evolutionary change will be necessary to mitigate the negative effects of increasing camouflage mismatch [19,23,27]. However, here we found little evidence that moult phenology in mountain hares in Scotland has changed despite directional climate change over the past 60 or more years. While more study is necessary to understand the full extent of phenotypic plasticity and why it appears moult phenology has not shifted in response to environmental change, we suggest that relaxed selection for camouflage, potentially coupled with low genetic variance, would be consistent with our findings. If true, we expect that the fitness consequences of climate change will ultimately depend on the strength of selection pressures such as predation. Altogether, our findings underscore that wildlife adaptive responses to anthropogenic stressors will ultimately depend on both abiotic and biotic conditions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank J. Flux and A. Watson for providing the historical data and making this research possible. We thank Glenn Iason and Paulo Celio Alves for assistance with identifying survey locations and discussions about this work, Andreas Dietz for providing downscaled snow cover data, and Denny Becks for help with field surveys. We also thank Z. Cheviron, C. Nadeau, T.L. Morelli, A. Sirén and M. Urban for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Next, we thank Allargue and other estate owners and staff for access, and especially to Andrew Dempster, Kenny Graham and Lewis Rose for logistical support with data collection.
Ethics
This study meets the terms of the ethics committee at the University of Montana.
Data accessibility
Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cc2fqz64m [79].
Authors' contributions
M.Z. and L.S.M. designed the study; M.Z. and S.N. collected the data; M.Z. and J.J.N. analysed the data; M.Z., S.T.G., S.N., J.J.N., M.S. and L.S.M. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of the Interior Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center Global Change Fellowship through Cooperative Agreement no. G10AC00624 to M.Z. and S.T.G.; North Carolina State University, University of Montana; The Explorers Club Exploration Fund to M.Z.; the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology grants 1743871 and 1907022 to L.S.M. and the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Award no. 1736249 to University of Montana. S.N. and M.S. were supported by the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government.
References
- 1.IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change (eds Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM), p. 1535 Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scheffers BR, et al. 2016. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354, aaf7671 ( 10.1126/science.aaf7671) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kovach RP, Gharrett AJ, Tallmon DA. 2012. Genetic change for earlier migration timing in a pink salmon population. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3870–3878. ( 10.1098/rspb.2012.1158) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buckley J, Butlin RK, Bridle JR. 2012. Evidence for evolutionary change associated with the recent range expansion of the British butterfly, Aricia agestis, in response to climate change. Mol. Ecol. 21, 267–280. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05388.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Phillips BL, Muñoz MM, Hatcher A, Macdonald SL, Llewelyn J, Lucy V, Moritz C. 2016. Heat hardening in a tropical lizard: geographic variation explained by the predictability and variance in environmental temperatures. Funct. Ecol. 30, 1161–1168. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.12609) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonnet T, Morrissey MB, Morris A, Morris S, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Kruuk LEB. 2019. The role of selection and evolution in changing parturition date in a red deer population. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000493 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000493) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mayor SJ, et al. 2017. Increasing phenological asynchrony between spring green-up and arrival of migratory birds. Sci. Rep. 7, 1902 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-02045-z) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Evans AE, Forester BR, Jockusch EL, Urban MC. 2018. Salamander morph frequencies do not evolve as predicted in response to 40 years of climate change. Ecography (Cop.) 41, 1687–1697. ( 10.1111/ecog.03588) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lane JE, Kruuk LEB, Charmantier A, Murie JO, Dobson FS. 2012. Delayed phenology and reduced fitness associated with climate change in a wild hibernator. Nature 489, 554–557. ( 10.1038/nature11335) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chevin L-M, Lande R, Mace GM. 2010. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000357 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Urban MC, et al. 2016. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353, aad8466 ( 10.1126/science.aad8466) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kunkel KE, Robinson DA, Champion S, Yin X, Estilow T, Frankson RM. 2016. Trends and extremes in Northern Hemisphere snow characteristics. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 65–73. ( 10.1007/s40641-016-0036-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.IPCC. In press. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. (eds H-O Pörtner et al.). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Williams CM, Henry HAL, Sinclair BJ. 2015. Cold truths: how winter drives responses of terrestrial organisms to climate change. Biol. Rev. 90, 214–235. ( 10.1111/brv.12105) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zimova M, Hackländer K, Good JMJM, Melo-Ferreira J, Alves PCPC, Mills LS. 2018. Function and underlying mechanisms of seasonal colour moulting in mammals and birds: what keeps them changing in a warming world? Biol. Rev. 93, 1478–1498. ( 10.1111/brv.12405) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beltran RS, Burns JM, Breed GA. 2018. Convergence of biannual moulting strategies across birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180318 ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.0318) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zimova M, Sirén APK, Nowak JJ, Bryan AM, Ivan JS, Morelli TL, Suhrer SL, Whittington J, Mills LS. 2020. Local climate determines vulnerability to camouflage mismatch in snowshoe hares. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 503–515. ( 10.1111/geb.13049) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mills LS, Zimova M, Oyler J, Running S, Abatzoglou JTJT, Lukacs PMPM. 2013. Camouflage mismatch in seasonal coat color due to decreased snow duration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7360–7365. ( 10.1073/pnas.1222724110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sultaire SM, Pauli JN, Martin KJ, Meyer MW, Notaro M, Zuckerberg B. 2016. Climate change surpasses land-use change in the contracting range boundary of a winter-adapted mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20153104 ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.3104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Imperio S, Bionda R, Viterbi R, Provenzale A. 2013. Climate change and human disturbance can lead to local extinction of Alpine rock ptarmigan: new insight from the western Italian Alps. PLoS ONE 8, e81598 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0081598) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Atmeh K, Andruszkiewicz A, Zub K. 2018. Climate change is affecting mortality of weasels due to camouflage mismatch. Sci. Rep. 8, 7648 ( 10.1038/s41598-018-26057-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zimova M, Mills LS, Nowak JJ. 2016. High fitness costs of climate change-induced camouflage mismatch. Ecol. Lett. 19, 299–307. ( 10.1111/ele.12568) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilson EC, Shipley AA, Zuckerberg B, Peery MZ, Pauli JN. 2018. An experimental translocation identifies habitat features that buffer camouflage mismatch in snowshoe hares. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12614 ( 10.1111/conl.12614) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Melin M, Mehtätalo L, Helle P, Ikonen K, Packalen T. 2020. Decline of the boreal willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) has been accelerated by more frequent snow-free springs. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10. ( 10.1038/s41598-020-63993-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Danco JF, DeAngelis AM, Raney BK, Broccoli AJ. 2016. Effects of a warming climate on daily snowfall events in the Northern Hemisphere. J. Clim. 29, 6295–6318. ( 10.1175/jcli-d-15-0687.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mills LS, et al. 2018. Winter color polymorphisms identify global hot spots for evolutionary rescue from climate change. Science 359, 1033–1036. ( 10.1126/science.aan8097) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kumar AV, Zimova M, Sparks JR, Mills LS. 2020. Snow-mediated plasticity does not prevent camouflage mismatch. Oecologia 194, 301–310. ( 10.1007/s00442-020-04680-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carlson SM, Cunningham CJ, Westley PAH. 2014. Evolutionary rescue in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 521–530. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2014.06.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Caro T. 2005. The adaptive significance of coloration in mammals. Bioscience 55, 125–136. ( 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)0550125:tasoci[2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Watson A. 1963. The effect of climate on the colour changes of mountain hares in Scotland. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 141, 823–835. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Flux JEC. 1970. Colour change of mountain hares (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. J. Zool. 162, 345–358. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb01270.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pedersen S, Odden M, Pedersen HC. 2017. Climate change induced molting mismatch? Mountain hare abundance reduced by duration of snow cover and predator abundance. Ecosphere 8, e01722 ( 10.1002/ecs2.1722) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brown I. 2019. Snow cover duration and extent for Great Britain in a changing climate: altitudinal variations and synoptic-scale influences. Int. J. Climatol. 39, 4611–4626. ( 10.1002/joc.6090) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Watson A, Wilson JD. 2018. Seven decades of mountain hare counts show severe declines where high-yield recreational game bird hunting is practised. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2663–2672. ( 10.1111/1365-2664.13235) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patton V, Ewald JA, Smith AA, Newey S, Iason GR, Thirgood SJ, Raynor R. 2010. Distribution of mountain hares Lepus timidus in Scotland: results from a questionnaire. Mamm. Rev. 40, 313–326. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00162.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Newey S, Bell M, Enthoven S, Thirgood S. 2003. Can distance sampling and dung plots be used to assess the density of mountain hares Lepus timidus? Wildl. Biol. 9, 185–192. ( 10.2981/wlb.2003.049) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Perry M, Hollis D. 2005. The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK. Int. J. Climatol. A J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 25, 1041–1054. ( 10.1002/joc.1161) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Spencer M. 2016. Reanalysis of Scottish mountain snow conditions. Edinburgh, UK: The University of Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dietz AJ, Kuenzer C, Dech S. 2015. Global SnowPack: a new set of snow cover parameters for studying status and dynamics of the planetary snow cover extent. Remote Sens. Lett. 6, 844–853. ( 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1084551) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Spencer M, Essery R, Chambers L, Hogg S. 2014. The historical snow survey of Great Britain: digitised data for Scotland. Scott. Geogr. J. 130, 252–265. ( 10.1080/14702541.2014.900184) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 48 ( 10.18637/jss.v067.i01) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Su YS, Yajima M.. 2012. R2jags: a package for running jags from R See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags.
- 45.Gelman A, Rubin DB. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–511. ( 10.1214/ss/1177011136) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fox RJ, Donelson JM, Schunter C, Ravasi T, Gaitán-Espitia JD. 2019. Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180174 ( 10.1098/rstb.2018.0174) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Merilä J, Hendry AP. 2014. Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence. Evol. Appl. 7, 1–14. ( 10.1111/eva.12137) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zimova M, Mills LS, Lukacs PMPM, Mitchell MSMS. 2014. Snowshoe hares display limited phenotypic plasticity to mismatch in seasonal camouflage. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140029 ( 10.1098/rspb.2014.0029) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Senner NR, Stager M, Cheviron ZA. 2017. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in climate change limits species' dispersal capabilities and adaptive potential. Ecography (Cop.) 41, 1428–1440. ( 10.1111/ecog.03234) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nadeau CP, Urban MC, Bridle JR. 2017. Climates past, present, and yet-to-come shape climate change vulnerabilities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 786–800. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2017.07.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Spencer M, Essery R. 2016. Scottish snow cover dependence on the North Atlantic Oscillation index. Hydrol. Res. 47, 619–629. ( 10.2166/nh.2016.085) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wright S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM, Kristensen TN. 2017. Revisiting adaptive potential, population size, and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 506–517. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.van Asch M, van Tienderen PH, Holleman LJM, Visser ME. 2007. Predicting adaptation of phenology in response to climate change, an insect herbivore example. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1596–1604. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01400.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tarka M, Hansson B, Hasselquist D. 2015. Selection and evolutionary potential of spring arrival phenology in males and females of a migratory songbird. J. Evol. Biol. 28, 1024–1038. ( 10.1111/jeb.12638) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jones MR, et al. 2018. Adaptive introgression underlies polymorphic seasonal camouflage in snowshoe hares. Science 360, 1355–1358. ( 10.1126/science.aar5273) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Giska I, et al. 2019. Introgression drives repeated evolution of winter coat color polymorphism in hares. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24 150–24 156. ( 10.1073/pnas.1910471116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jones MR, Mills LS, Jensen JD, Good JM. 2020. Convergent evolution of seasonal camouflage in response to reduced snow cover across the snowshoe hare range. Evolution (NY) 74, 2033–2045. ( 10.1111/evo.13976) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ferreira MS, Alves PC, Callahan CM, Marques JP, Mills LS, Good JM, Melo-Ferreira J. 2017. The transcriptional landscape of seasonal coat color molt in the snowshoe hare. Mol. Ecol. 26, 4173–4185. ( 10.1111/mec.14177) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jones MR, Mills LS, Jensen JD, Good JM. 2020. The origin and spread of locally adaptive seasonal camouflage in snowshoe hares. Am. Nat. 196, 316–332. ( 10.1086/710022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Massimino D, Harris SJ, Gillings S. 2018. Evaluating spatiotemporal trends in terrestrial mammal abundance using data collected during bird surveys. Biol. Conserv. 226, 153–167. ( 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.026) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Melo-Ferreira J, Boursot P, Randi E, Kryukov A, Suchentrunk F, Ferrand N, Alves PC. 2007. The rise and fall of the mountain hare during Pleistocene glaciations: expansion and retreat with hybridization in the Iberian Peninsula. Mol. Ecol. 16, 605–618. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03166.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zachos FE, Ben Slimen H, Hackländer K, Giacometti M, Suchentrunk F. 2010. Regional genetic in situ differentiation despite phylogenetic heterogeneity in Alpine mountain hares. J. Zool. 282, 47–53. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00710.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Duarte RC, Flores AA V, Stevens M. 2017. Camouflage through colour change: mechanisms, adaptive value and ecological significance. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160342 ( 10.1098/rstb.2016.0342) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wallace AR. 1879. The protective colours of animals. Science 2, 128–137. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Saccheri IJ, Rousset F, Watts PC, Brakefield PM, Cook LM. 2008. Selection and gene flow on a diminishing cline of melanic peppered moths. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16 212–16 217. ( 10.1073/pnas.0803785105) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Barrett RDH, et al. 2019. Linking a mutation to survival in wild mice. Science 363, 499–504. ( 10.1126/science.aav3824) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Darwin C. 1859. The origin of species. London, UK: John Murray. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lahti DC, Johnson NA, Ajie BC, Otto SP, Hendry AP, Blumstein DT, Coss RG, Donohue K, Foster SA. 2009. Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 487–496. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Flux JEC. 1970. Life history of mountain hare (Lepus timidus scoticus) in north-east Scotland. J. Zool. 161, 75–123. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb02171.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Watson J, Leitch AF, Rae SR. 1993. The diet of golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Scotland. Ibis (Lond. 1859) 135, 387–393. ( 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1993.tb02110.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hesford N, Baines D, Smith AA, Ewald JA. 2020. Distribution of mountain hares Lepus timidus in Scotland in 2016/2017 and changes relative to earlier surveys in 1995/1996 and 2006/2007. Wildl. Biol. 2020 ( 10.2981/wlb.00650) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Thirgood S, Redpath S, Newton I, Hudson P. 2000. Raptors and red grouse: conservation conflicts and management solutions. Conserv. Biol. 14, 95–104. ( 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99013.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thompson PS, Douglas DJT, Hoccom DG, Knott J, Roos S, Wilson JD. 2016. Environmental impacts of high-output driven shooting of red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica. Ibis (Lond. 1859) 158, 446–452. ( 10.1111/ibi.12356) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rehnus M, Bollmann K, Schmatz DR, Hackländer K, Braunisch V. 2018. Alpine glacial relict species losing out to climate change: the case of the fragmented mountain hare population (Lepus timidus) in the Alps. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 3236–3253. ( 10.1111/gcb.14087) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA. 2011. Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol. Appl. 4, 326–337. ( 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Harrison A, Newey S, Gilbert L, Haydon DT, Thirgood S. 2010. Culling wildlife hosts to control disease: mountain hares, red grouse and louping ill virus. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 926–930. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01834.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mustin K, Arroyo B, Beja P, Newey S, Irivine RJ, Kestler J, Redpath SM. 2018. Consequences of game bird management for non-game species in Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2285–2295. ( 10.1111/1365-2664.13131) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zimova M, Giery ST, Newey S, Nowak JJ, Spencer M, Mills LS. 2020. Data from: Lack of phenological shift leads to increased camouflage mismatch in mountain hares. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.cc2fqz64m) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Zimova M, Giery ST, Newey S, Nowak JJ, Spencer M, Mills LS. 2020. Data from: Lack of phenological shift leads to increased camouflage mismatch in mountain hares. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.cc2fqz64m) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cc2fqz64m [79].



