Table 6. Schirmer Test in Eyes with Pterygium Pre-excision vs. Post-excision.
Year | Author | n = No. patients, No. eyes | Surgical Technique | Follow-up Period (m) | Results post-surgery | Eyelid position | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schirmer I Test | |||||||
2020 | Zhao et al.(12) | n = 35, 40 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 1, 3 | Improvement | O | |
2020 | Patkar et al.(13) | n = 100, 200 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 10d, 1, 2 | Improvement | O | |
2019 | Li et al.(17) | n = 108, 108 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 1, 3, 6 | Improvement | C | |
2019 | Jeong et al.(5) | n = 30, 30 | Conjunctival autograft | 1, 3 | Improvement† | U | |
2017 | Drvmvrvprasadarao et al.(40) | n = 80, 80 | Conjunctival autograft | 3, 12, 18 | Improvement1 | U | |
2017 | Mittal et al.(41) | n = 43, 43 | Conjunctival autograft | 6 | Improvement | U | |
2016 | Julio et al.(42) | n = 32, 32 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 1 | No Improvement | U | |
2013 | Türkyılmaz et al.(45) | n = 74, 74 | Dissociated edges of conjunctiva sutured together | 3, 12, 18 | Improvement1 | U | |
2009 | Dong et al.(48) | n = 12, 12 | Not Reported | 1 | Improvement2 | U | |
2007 | Li et al.(49) | n = 70, 70 | Bare-sclera | 1 | Not Reported | U | |
Basic Secretion Test | |||||||
2015 | Kampitak et al.(44) | n = 40, 40 | Amniotic membrane graft | 1 | Improvement† | U | |
2006 | Kiliç et al.(50) | n = 14, 14 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 1, 6 | Improvement3 | U | |
Schirmer II Test | |||||||
2020 | Patkar et al.(13) | n = 100, 200 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 10d, 1, 2 | Improvement | O | |
2017 | Mittal et al.(41) | n = 43, 43 | Conjunctival autograft | 6 | Improvement | U | |
Unspecified | |||||||
2017 | Wang et al.(51) | n = 56, 56 | Conjunctival autograft | 1d, 1w, 1, 6 | Improvement | U | |
2011 | Wang et al.(47) | n = 60, 60 | Limbal-conjunctival autograft | 1 | No difference | U |
m = months, d = days, w = weeks, O = open, C = closed, U = unspecified
Statistically significant
Not significant for both no recurrence of pterygium and recurrence of pterygium
Study included pingueculum only
1m: No improvement, 6m: Improvement