Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
. 2020 Aug 31;117(35-36):575–582. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0575

Vitamin and Mineral Status in a Vegan Diet

Cornelia Weikert 1,*, Iris Trefflich 1, Juliane Menzel 1, Rima Obeid 2, Alessa Longree 1, Jutta Dierkes 3, Klaus Meyer 4, Isabelle Herter-Aeberli 5, Knut Mai 6,7,8,9, Gabriele I Stangl 10, Sandra M Müller 11, Tanja Schwerdtle 11,12, Alfonso Lampen 1, Klaus Abraham 1
PMCID: PMC7779846  PMID: 33161940

Abstract

Background

In Germany, public interest in a vegan diet is steadily growing. There are, however, no current data on the macro- and micronutrient status of vegans.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study entitled “The Risks and Benefits of a Vegan Diet” (RBVD), we investigated the dietary intake, basic laboratory parameters, vitamin status, and trace-element status of 36 vegans and 36 persons on an omnivorous diet. Each group consisted of 18 men and 18 women aged 30–60.

Results

Nearly all the vegans and one-third of the persons on a mixed diet had consumed supplements in the previous 4 weeks. Vegans and non-vegans had similar energy intake but differed in the intake of both macronutrients (e.g., dietary fiber) and micronutrients (e.g., vitamins B12, B2, D, E, and K, as well as folate, iodine, and iron). There were no intergroup differences in the biomarkers of vitamin B12, vitamin D, or iron status. The ferritin values and blood counts indicated iron deficiency in four vegans and three non-vegans. Measurements in 24-hour urine samples revealed lower calcium excretion and markedly lower iodine excretion in vegans compared to non-vegans; in one-third of the vegans, iodine excretion was lower than the WHO threshold value (<20 µg/L) for severe iodine deficiency.

Conclusion

Vitamin B12 status was similarly good in vegans and non-vegans, even though the vegans consumed very little dietary B12. This may be due to the high rate of supplementation. The findings imply a need to also assure adequate iodine intake in the population, especially among persons on a vegan diet.


In recent years, the interest in a vegan diet, avoiding all foods of animal origin, has been growing steadily in Germany. The results of market research surveys indicate that currently approximately 6 million German citizens follow a vegetarian diet (vegetarians) and almost 1 million a vegan diet (vegans) (1, 2). Data of the 7-day Adventist Health Study from the US describe positive effects of these types of diets against the development of obesity, hypertension (lacto-ovo vegetarians: relative risk [RR] 0.45; 95% confidence intervals: [0.44; 0.47]; vegans: RR 0.25 [0.22; 0.28]); diabetes (lacto-ovo vegetarians RR: 0.39 [0.36; 0.42]; vegans RR: 0.22 [0.18; 0.28]) (3) and cardiovascular mortality in males (lacto-ovo vegetarians RR 0.77 [0.59; 0.99]; vegans RR 0.58 [0.38; 0.89]) (4, 5). In addition, a recent review with meta-analysis has shown that a vegetarian diet is associated with a reduced risk of ischemic heart disease (RR: 0.75 [0.68; 0.82]) and cancer (RR: 0.92 [0.87; 0.98]), and a vegan diet with a decreased risk of cancer (RR: 0.85 [0.75; 0.95]) compared to an omnivorous diet, even after adjusting for key confounding factors, such as smoking and body mass index (6). Thus, a meat-free diet would be desirable from the perspective of the health of the entire population. Furthermore, reduced consumption of foods of animal origin could contribute to ensuring food security in the future (7) and combating climate change (8).

However, risks associated with a purely vegan diet are under discussion as well. In its vegan diet position paper, the German Nutrition Society (DGE, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung) describes the following substances as critical nutrients: vitamin B12, vitamin B2 (riboflavin) and vitamin D, protein (essential amino acids), long-chain n-3 fatty acids, as well as calcium and the trace elements iron, iodine, zinc, and selenium (9). By contrast, a vegan diet is expected to ensure a good supply of vitamin C, vitamin E, thiamine and folate, the minerals magnesium and potassium, as well as dietary fiber and secondary plant compounds (9, 10). The lower intake of saturated fatty acids and cholesterol is also regarded as beneficial (10). Up-to-date data on the intake of micronutrients and macronutrients among vegans in Germany are currently not available. Thus, the aim of this cross-sectional study of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung) was to provide first insights into the current micronutrient status in a vegan diet compared to an omnivorous diet.

Methods

Study design

The 72 participants of the study “Risks and Benefits of a Vegan Diet“ (RBVD) were recruited in Berlin at the BfR in the period from January to July 2017 (figure 1) (11). The sample size for this study is based on the power calculation for the primary research question (bone health in vegans compared to omnivores). The observed differences in bone health are part of a further planned publication. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (no. EA4/121/16).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the study “Risks and Benefits of a Vegan Diet“ (RBVD);

BMI, body mass index

Dietary habits were recorded using three-day weighed food protocol. With the help of the German Nutrient Database (BLS, Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel) Version 3.02, the mean daily intake of macronutrients and micronutrients was calculated (12). Information about age, educational attainment, and lifestyle factors was collected using tablet-based questionnaires. Height and body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure were measured using a standardized method (eMethods, eTable 1).

eTable 1. Overview of the methods used to determine the biochemical parameters.

Sample material Measured by: Biomarker Method Additional information
Serum Saarland University, Homburg, Germany Vitamin B12
Holotranscobalamin
Folate
Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay
Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay
Competitive immunoassay
EDTA plasma Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany Parathyroid hormone Commercial ELISA test kits The test measures intact, i.e. biologically active PTH.
Serum Potsdam University, Nuthetal, Germany Selenium


Selenoprotein P
Inductively coupled plasma—tandem mass spectrometry; For quality control, reference serum and Seronorm were also tested.
ELISA kit
Kopp JF, Mülle, SM, Pohl G, Lossow K, Kipp AP, Schwerdtle T: A quick and simple method for the determination of six trace elements in mammalian serum samples using ICP-MS/MS. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2019; 54: 221–5.
EDTA plasma Medical laboratory Labor 28 GmbH, Berlin, Germany Hemoglobin
Hematocrit
Erythrocytes
Leucocytes
Lymphocytes
Platelets
HbA1 c
SLS Photometric Hemoglobin detection (XN)
Impedance measurement with hydrodynamic focusing; Fluorescence flow cytometry (XN)





Turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (XN)
www.labor28.de
NaF blood Medical laboratory
Labor 28 GmbH,
Berlin, Germany
Glucose


Homocysteine
Hexokinase/G6p DH testing


High performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector
www.labor28.de
Serum Medical laboratory
Labor 28 GmbH,
Berlin, Germany
GGT
GOT
GPT
Creatinine
hsCRP
Ferritin
Zinc
Enzyme International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine



Enzymatic method, nephelometry
Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay
Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
www.labor28.de
EDTA-Plasma Bevital AS, Bergen, Norway Methylmalonic acid Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry Windelberg A, Arseth O, Kvalheim G, Ueland PM: Automated assay for the determination of methylmalonic acid, total homocysteine, and related amino acids in human serum or plasma by means of methylchloroformate derivatization and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2005; 51: 2103–9.
Vitamin D3 and D2
Vitamin A
Alpha-tocopherol
Gamma-tocopherol
Vitamin K
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/ mass spectrometry Midttun Ø, Ueland PM: Determination of vitamins A, D and E in a small volume of human plasma by a high-throughput method based on liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2011; 25: 1942–8. Midttun Ø, McCann A, Aarseth O, et al.: Combined measurement of 6 fat-soluble vitamins and 26 water-soluble functional vitamin markers and amino acids in 50 μL of serum or plasma by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2011; 88: 10427–436.
B1 Thiamin Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/ mass spectrometry McCann A, Midttun Ø, Whitfield KC, et al.: Comparable performance characteristics of plasma thiamine and erythrocyte thiamine diphosphate in response to thiamine fortification in rural cambodian women. Nutrients 2017; 9: pii: E676.
B2 riboflavin
B3 nicotinamide
B6 pyridoxal 5‘-phosphate
Liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry/ mass spectrometry Midttun Ø, Hustad S, Ueland PM: Quantitative profiling of biomarkers related to B-vitamin status, tryptophan metabolism and inflammation in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom,2009; 23: 1371–9.
24-hour urine collection Medical laboratory
Labor 28 GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Calcium
Creatinine
Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS NovAA®350) Photometry www.labor28.de
24-hour urine collection ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Iodine Modified Sandell–Kolthoff reaction Pino S, Fang S, Braverman L: Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidising reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clin Chem 1996; 42: 239–43.

GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; SLS, sodium lauryl sulfate

Determination of the micronutrient status using biomarkers

From all participants in the study, 60 mL of blood was obtained. On the same day, a differential blood count was performed and lipid, HbA1c, glucose, liver enzyme, creatinine, homocysteine, (highly sensitive) C-reactive protein, ferritin, and zinc levels were determined in a certified routine laboratory (Labor 28 GmbH, Berlin, Germany). In a 24-hour urine sample, urine creatine and calcium concentrations were determined. All other biochemical analyses were performed on samples stored at a temperature of -80 °C (etable 1).

The vitamin B12 indicator (4cB12), calculated from the concentrations of holotranscobalamin, vitamin B12, homocysteine, and methylmalonic acid, was used to assess the vitamin B12 status (13).

Statistical analysis

The statistical software suite SAS Enterprise Guide Version 7.13 was used for the analysis of the data (eMethods).

Results

Characteristics of study participants

36 vegans and 36 omnivores aged between 30 and 57 years participated in the study. The vegan participants had followed their diet between 1.6 years and 20.2 years. General characteristics of the study participants and important lifestyle factors are summarized in Table 1. Almost all vegans and a third of the omnivores had taken dietary supplements within the preceding four weeks (Figure 2, eTables 2 and 3). A comparison of basic biochemical data revealed significantly lower concentrations of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol among vegans compared to omnivores (table 3).

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants in the cross-sectional RBVD study by diet.

Parameter Vegan Omnivorous p value
Study size, n
Female
Male
36
18
18
36
18
18
Age (years) 37.5 (32.5–44.0) 38.5 (32.0–46.0) 0.75
Duration of vegan diet
(years)
4.8 (3.1–8.7)
Educational attainment
Low (no qualifications)
Moderate (vocational training)
High (university / university of applied sciences)


0 (0)
11 (30.6)
25 (69.4)


1 (2.8)
11 (30.6)
24 (66.6)
0.60
Lifestyle factors
Physical activity (h/week) 2.8 (0.9–3.8) 2.3 (1.2–4.1) 0.69
Walking (h/week) 7.0 (5.0–12.0) 7.0 (3.5–11.8) 0.15
Never smoker
Ex-smoker
Smoker
24 (66.7)
8 (22.2)
4 (11.1)
21 (58.3)
6 (16.7)
9 (25.0)
0.30
Anthropometry
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.9 ± 3.2 24.0 ± 2.1 0.08
Waist circumference men (cm)
Waist circumference women (cm)
84.5 ± 8.9
73.1 ± 6.9
86.0 ± 6.1
77.2 ± 6.2
0.560
0.07
Blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
111.2 ± 11.0
69.8 ± 7.7
114.7 ± 11.9
73.0 ± 7.1
0.210
0.07
Supplement intake 35 (97.2) 12 (33.3) < 0.0001

All results presented as median (interquartile range), mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), p value for Mann–Whitney U test, t-test, chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Supplement use among the participants of the cross-sectional RBVD study within the preceding four weeks

eTable 2. Mean daily intake of vitamins and minerals through supplements in the RBVD study.

Parameter Vegans (n = 36) Omnivores (n = 36) p
Vitamins (mg)
Retinol equ. (µg) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–85.71) 0.06
Vitamin B12 (µg) 82.14 (3.86–286.43) 0.00 (0.00–0.11) <0.0001
Vitamin D (µg) 5.00 (0.00–1250.00) 0.00 (0.00–1.04) 0.07
Folate (µg) 0.00 (0.00–85.71) 0.00 (0.00–41.43) 0.71
Vitamin B1 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.15) 0.30
Vitamin B2 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.13) 0.76
Vitamin B3 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–1.93) 0.14
Vitamin B6 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.20) 0.81
Vitamin C 0.00 (0.00–34.29) 25.71 (0.00–420.00) 0.04
Vitamin E 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–2.57) 0.04
Vitamin K 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–1.50) 0.18
Pantothenic acid 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.40) 0.46
Minerals (mg)
Calcium 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–17.14) 0.25
Zinc 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–3.04) 0.23
Iodine 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–1.25) 0.30
Iron 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.20) 0.64

All values as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3), p values according to Mann–Whitney U test

eTable 3. Vitamin and mineral status depending on the intake of dietary supplements.

Supplement n Vegans n Omnivores
Vitamin B12 Vitamin B12 (pg/mL) Vitamin B12 (pg/mL)
Yes
No
33
3
523 (312–759)
286 (257–456)
3
33
317 (224–521)
362 (310–488)
Vitamin B12 4cB12 4cB12
Yes
No
33
3
0.57 (0.09–1.25)
0.08 (−0.17–0.43)
3
33
0.24 (−0.73–0.69)0.42 (0.20–0.70)
Vitamin D 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L) 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L)
Yes
No
18
18
88 (76–97)
24 (19–60)
4
32
66 (46–79)
44 (35–69)
Folate Folate (ng/mL) Folate (ng/mL)
Yes
No
10
26
10.9 (8.5–19.6)
10.9 (7.6–12.3)
4
32
14.3 (9.5–18.5)
7.5 (6.2–10.6)
Vitamin B1 Thiamine (nmol/L) Thiamine (nmol/L)
Yes
No
4
32
3.7 (2.4–5.5)
2.1 (1.6–2.8)
3
33
2.4 (2.2–5.0)
1.8 (1.4–2.4)
Vitamin B2 Riboflavin (nmol/L) Riboflavin (nmol/L)
Yes
No
6
30
8.2 (5.9–18.1)
5.6 (4.3–10.2)
3
33
13.2 (12.2–33.5)
8.5 (6.8–10.2)
Vitamin B3 Nicotinamide (nmol/L) Nicotinamide (nmol/L)
Yes
No
3
33
234 (123–306)
188 (162–228)
3
33
252 (245–282)
242 (193–305)
Vitamin B6 Pyridoxal 5‘-phosphate (nmol/L) Pyridoxal 5‘-phosphate (nmol/L)
Yes
No
6
30
92 (54–154)
67 (47–84)
3
33
132 (62–218)
78 (46–95)
Vitamin E Alpha-tocopherol (µmol/L) Alpha-tocopherol (µmol/L)
Yes
No
3
33
32.3 (27.2–34.8)
28.5 (25.8–33.9)
4
32
37.6 (35.5–40.6)
33.2 (28.5–41.5)
Vitamin K Vitamin K1 (nmol/L) Vitamin K1 (nmol/L)
Yes
No
3
33
1.54 (1.40–1.62)
1.55 (1.29–2.24)
3
33
1.60 (0.97–1.70)
0.75 (0.53–1.08)
Calcium* Calcium (mg/L) Calcium (mg/L)
Yes
No
4
32
49 (34–42)
57 (35–77)
3
33
75 (42–328)
87 (50–164)
Zinc Zinc (µg/dL) Zinc (µg/dL)
Yes
No
5
28
85 (81–92)
77 (71–89)
5
31
89 (85–91)
83 (81–94)
Selenium Selenium (µg/L) Selenium (µg/L)
Yes
No
3
33
74 (68–101)
67 (58–81)
3
33
82 (70–88)
77 (67–82)
Selenium Selenoprotein P(mg/L) Selenoprotein P (mg/L)
Yes
No
3
33
5.1 (3.4–6.2)
3.0 (2.5–3.8)
3
33
5.2 (4.9–5.9)
5.0 (4.1–5.5)
Iodine* Iodine (µg/L) Iodine (µg/L)
Yes
No
5
31
46 (36–56)
27 (17–36)
3
33
49 (34–166)
78 (43–100)
Iron Ferritin (ng/mL) Ferritin (ng/mL)
Yes
No
6
30
86 (39–110)
56 (30–82)
3
33
49 (31–64)
74 (33–121)

All values as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3); *excretion in 24-hour urine

Table 3. Status of biochemical basic data and selected vitamins and minerals of the participants in the cross-sectional RBVD study by diet.

Parameter Vegans Omnivores p Reference intervals
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13.6 ± 1.2 13.8 ± 1.3 0.47 F: 12.0–15.4; M: 13.5–17.2
Hematocrit (%) 40.6 ± 3.0 41.2 ± 3.2 0.42 F: 35.5–45.0; M: 39.5–50.5
Red blood cells (T/L) 4.5 ± 0.5 4.7 ± 0.3 0.29 F: 3.9–5.15; M: 4.3–5.75
MCV (fl) 91 (88–92) 89 (85–91) 0.09 80–99
MCHC (g/dL) 33.4 ± 0.9 33.4 ± 1.2 0.89 31.5–36.0
Leucocytes (G/L) 4.7 (4.1–6.4) 5.2 (4.6–6.5) 0.15 3.6–10.2
Lymphocytes (%) 31 ± 10 34 ± 8 0.18 20–44
Platelets (G/L) 215 ± 70 239 ± 49 0.11 150–370
Total protein (g/dL) 6.8 ± 0.4 7.0 ± 0.3 0.21 6.2–8.3
hsCRP (mg/L) 0.39 (0.21–0.88) 0.63 (0.24–1.74) 0.25 <1.0
Glucose (mg/dL) 81 (78–87) 83 (77–90) 0.41 55–100
HbA1c (%) 5.1 (5.0–5.2) 5.2 (5.1–5.4) 0.09 <6.5
GGT (U/L) 15 (12–20) 18 (14–24) 0.07 F: <42; M: <71
AST (U/L) 23 (19–25) 22 (18–27) 0.65 F: <35; M: <50
ALT (U/L) 21 (17–27) 19 (15–28) 0.57 F: <35; M: <50
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.82 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.15 0.042 F: <0.95; M: <1.17
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (mU/L) 2.1 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 1.1 0.34 0.27–4.2
Parathyroid hormone (pg/mL) 53 (40–66) 51 (27–58) 0.16 15–65
Iron (µg/dL) 89 ± 31 106 ± 39 0.053 33–193
Ferritin (ng/mL) 60 (31–84) 69 (32–114) 0.23 F: 15–150; M: 30–400
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 157 (137–180) 204 (179–223) <0.0001 <200
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 87 (69–97) 116 (94–136) 0.001
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 57 (51–72) 62 (52–81) 0.21 > 40
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 71 (53–91) 85 (52–121) 0.26 <200
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL) 458 (295–758) 363 (308–494) 0.12 197–771
Holotranscobalmin (pmol/L) 89 (59–205) 84 (68–100) 0.35 <35
Homocysteine (µmol/L) 8.6 (6.7–11.3) 8.8 (7.3–10.5) 0.90 5–15
Methylmalonic acid (µmol/L) 0.17 (0.15–0.22) 0.18 (0.16–0.21) 0.62 <0.26
4cB12*1 0.54 (0.07–1.24) 0.42 (0.19–0.70) 0.47 *1
25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L) 68.6 (21.5–88.1) 45.4 (34.6–68.6) 0.34 20–150
Folate (ng/mL) 10.9 (7.7–12.8) 7.8 (6.4–11.2) 0.03 3.9–26.8
Vitamin A (µmol/L) 1.8 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.5 0.003 1.46–2.84
Vitamin A/cholesterol (µmol/mmol) 0.45 (0.36–0.50) 0.36 (0.33–0.52) 0.19
Alpha-tocopherol (µmol/L) 28.7 (26.0–34.0) 34.8 (28.7–41.5) 0.003 18.9–38.8
Alpha-tocopherol/cholesterol (µmo/mmol) 7.11 (6.51–7.43) 6.72 (6.08–7.23) 0.06
Vitamin K1 (nmol/L) 1.55 (1.30–2.23) 0.78 (0.54–1.13) <0.0001 0.1–8.7
Vitamin B1 thiamine (nmol/L) 7.5 (5.8–8.6) 6.4 (5.0–7.9) 0.15 7–16
Vitamin B2 riboflavin (nmol/L) 6.0 (4.4–10.7) 9.1 (6.8–11.8) 0.03 5–38
Vitamin B3 nicotinamide (nmol/L) 190 (161–239) 243 (194–299) 0.01 92–388
Vitamin B6 pyridoxal 5‘-phosphate (nmol/L) 67 (49–89) 79 (47–100) 0.62 17–102
Selenium (µg/L) 68 (60–82) 77 (68–84) 0.11
Selenoprotein P (mg/L) 3.3 (2.6–4.5) 5.0 (4.2–5.5) <0.0001
Zinc (µg/dL) 80 ± 12 87 ± 13 0.008 60–120
Iodine (µg/L)*2 28 (18–42) 74 (42–102) <0.0001 >100*3
Calcium (mg/L)*2 56 (37–73) 86 (49–166) 0.004

All results reported as median (interquartile range) or mean ± standard deviation; p values according to Mann–Whitney U test or t-test

*1 4cB12, vitamin B12 indicator, combing the four preceding markers, adjusted for age;

(>1.5 increased B12; -0.5 to 1.5 adequate supply; <-0.5 to -2.5 undersupply; <-2.5 deficiency)

*2 Excretion in 24-h urine sample

*3 WHO cut-off value for undersupply; F, women; M, men

Macro- and micronutrient intake

Despite the almost identical energy intake, differences between vegans and omnivores were observed with respect to both macronutrients and micronutrients. Of note is the considerably higher intake of dietary fiber, vitamin E, vitamin K, and folate as well as iron and the very low intake of vitamin B12, vitamin D, and iodine among vegans compared to omnivores (table 2).

Table 2. Daily energy intake as well as macronutrient and micronutrient intake of participants in the cross-sectional RBVD study by diet, based on three-day weighed food records without taking supplement use into account.

Parameter Vegans Omnivores p D-A-CH recommen- dation*
Energy (kcal) 2 270
(1 800–2 762)
2 386
(2 081–2 737)
0.32
Dietary fiber (g) 46 (34–56) 24 (19–30) <0.0001
Protein (g) 72 (55–92) 86 (71–107) 0.02
Carbohydrates (g) 259 (212–371) 230 (199–291) 0.12
Sugar (g) 54 (37–69) 47 (35–69) 0.48
Fat (g) 86 (64–111) 104 (88–143) 0.004
Vitamins (mg)
Retinol equ (µg) 1 841
(1 161–2 609)
1 390
(1 020–1 910)
0.20
Vitamin B12 (µg) 0.29
(0.14–0.85)
5.22
(4.15–7.96)
<0.0001 3.0
Vitamin D (µg) 0.94
(0.29–1.85)
2.53
(1.86–4.29)
<0.0001 20
Folate (µg) 446 (311–607) 296 (249–343) 0.0005 300
Vitamin B1 1.72
(1.26–2.05)
1.28
(1.09–1.68)
0.049 F: 1.0
M: 1.2
Vitamin B2 1.47
(0.96–2.11)
1.98
(1.56–2.26)
0.01 F: 1.0–1.1
M: 1.3–1.4
Vitamin B3 14.2
(11.6–19.4)
17.7
(14.4–22.3)
0.02 12–14
Vitamin B6 2.22
(1.68–2.69)
1.75
(1.41–2.08)
0.02 1.2–1.5
Vitamin C 173 (108–276) 131 (98–174) 0.12 95–110
Vitamin E 25.9
(16.1–37.6)
13.4
(11.1–18.6)
<0.0001 12–14
Vitamin K 0.27
(0.17–0.43)
0.10
(0.07–0.18)
<0.0001 0.06–0.08
Pantothenic acid 4.35
(3.46–5.65)
5.21
(4.30–6.99)
0.02 6
Minerals (mg)
Calcium 899
(650–1 257)
1 049
(822–1 457)
0.04 1 000
Zinc 11.4

(8.8–13.4)
12.3
(10.2–16.3)
0.046 7–10
Iodine 0.08
(0.05–0.10)
0.12
(0.08–0.17)
0.002 0.15–0.18
Iron 22.0
(15.5–26.4)
14.0
(11.5–17.0)
0.0001 10–15

All values as median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3), p values according to Mann–Whitney U test.

*D-A-CH reference value: common reference values of the specialist societies of the three D-A-CH countries (Germany [D], Austria [A], and Switzerland [CH])

F, women; M, men

Micronutrient status (blood and urine)

Among vegans, lower concentrations of vitamin B2, vitamin B3, vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol), vitamin A, selenoprotein P, and zinc in blood as well as a reduced excretion of iodine and calcium in 24-hour urine samples compared to omnivores was observed. By contrast, folate and vitamin K1 blood levels were higher among vegans. Yet, no differences between vegans and omnivores were found with respect to median vitamin B12, 25-hydroxy vitamin D and ferritin concentrations (table 3). In four vegans and three omnivores, however, signs of latent to manifest iron deficiency (lower ferritin levels and blood count changes) were observed. With respect to the vitamin B12 status, the B12 indicator (4cB12) revealed a mild deficiency in two vegans and one omnivore, as well as increased levels in four vegans. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the association between the duration of vegan diet and 4cB12 was 0.30 (p = 0.07).

Riboflavin levels below the reference range were measured in 13 vegans (36%) and 5 omnivores (14%).

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured as an important parameter of calcium, phosphate, and vitamin D metabolism. Ten vegans and three omnivores showed elevated PTH levels (>65 pg/mL). The comparison of calcium excretion found that the excretion in vegans with elevated PTH levels was lower compared to vegans without elevated PTH levels (p = 0.02). There was no correlation between duration of a vegan diet and calcium excretion (r = -0.02, p = 0.88 according to Spearman). With regard to 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels, plasma concentrations of <30 nmol/L (<12 ng/mL) were measured in 12 vegans and 8 omnivores, while plasma levels of <50 nmol/L (<20 ng/mL) were measured in 15 vegans and 19 omnivores. Supplement users showed higher 25-hydroxy vitamin D plasma concentrations (etable 3).

Iodine excretion was lower in vegans compared to omnivores. Only 8% of vegans and 25% of omnivores achieved iodine excretion of ≥100 µg/L. 31% of the vegans excreted less than 20 µg/L. When viewed alone, the screening parameter thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) was found abnormal in two vegans and two omnivores with values of >4mU/L.

Discussion

The focus of our study was on vitamin B12, vitamin B2 and vitamin D as well as calcium and the trace elements iron, iodine, zinc, and selenium, since these have been critically discussed with respect to a vegan diet.

Studies on the nutritional status of vegans are very rare (14–18). In addition, most of these studies only collected data on the intake of macronutrients and micronutrients using dietary food records. Only two of these studies—Elorinne et al. from Finnland and Schüpbach et al. from Switzerland—also looked at specific blood parameters (16, 18) (etable 4).

eTable 4. Overview of the most relevant studies on macronutrient and micronutrient intake and on the status of macronutrients and micronutrients in the blood of vegans and omnivores.

Study characteristics Results macronutrient and micronutrient intake (vegans compared to omnivores)
Higher intake Lower intake No difference
Clarys et al. (2014) (15)
Country: Belgium Dietary fiberIron Alcohol Calcium Cholesterol Energy (kcal) MUFA ProteinPUFA Salt SFA Total fat Carbohydrates Sugar
Vegans/omnivores: n = 104 / n = 155
Design: Cross-sectional
Survey method: FFQ
Kristensen et al. (2015) (17)
Country: Denmark Dietary fiberIron Energy (kJ)* 2 Folate Potassium Magnesium PUFA SaltVitamin B1 Vitamin B6 Vitamin C Vitamin E Beta-carotenoidsCalcium Cholesterol Iodine Carbohydrates*1 MUFA Phosphate Proteins Selenium SFA Total fatTrans fatty acids Vitamin A Vitamin B12 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin D Zinc Sugar Energy (kJ)*1Carbohydrates*2
Vegans/omnivores: n = 70 / n = 1257
Design: Cross-sectional
Survey method: 4-day weighed food protocol
Schüpbach et al. (2017 (18)
Country: Switzerland Dietary fiberIron Folic acid Potassium Carbohydrates Magnesium Pantothenic acid PUFAVitamin B1 Vitamin B6 Vitamin C Vitamin E equ. Sugar CalciumCholesterol Protein SFA Vitamin B12 Vitamin D Chlorine Energy (kcal) MUFA Sodium Phosphorus Retinol equ. Total fatVitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Zinc
Vegans/omnivores: n = 53 / n = 100
Design: Cross-sectional
Survey method: 3-day weighed food protocol
Elorinne et al. (2016) (16)
Country: Finnland Dietary fiberIron Folate Carbohydrates CholesterolProteins Selenium SFA Vitamin B12 Vitamin B2Vitamin B3 Vitamin D Zinc Beta-carotenoidsCalcium Energy (MJ) MUFA PUFA Total fatVitamin A Vitamin B1 Vitamin C Vitamin E
Vegans/omnivores: n = 22 / n = 19
Design: Cross-sectional
Survey method: 3-day weighed food protocol
Allès et al. (2017) (14)
Country: France Dietary fiberIron Folate Iodine Potassium Carbohydrates Copper Magnesium Manganese MUFA PUFA Vitamin A Vitamin B1 Vitamin B6 Vitamin C Vitamin E Vitamin K Alcohol Calcium Cholesterol Sodium Phosphate Proteins Selenium SFATotal fat Vitamin B12 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin D Zinc Pantothenic acid
Vegans/omnivores: n = 789 / n = 90664
Design: Cross-sectional
Survey method: 3-day weighed food protocol
Study characteristics Results macronutrient and micronutrient intake (vegans compared to omnivores)
Increased levels Reduced levels No difference
Schüpbach et al. (2017) (18)
Country: Switzerland FolateMagnesium Vitamin B1 Vitamin C Iodine (urine)Niacin Vitamin A Vitamin E Zinc Beta-carotenoidsBiotin Ferritin Pantothenic acid SeleniumVitamin B12 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B6
Vegans/omnivores: n = 53 / n = 100
Design: Cross-sectional
Elorinne et al. (2016) (16)
Country: Finnland DaidzeinFerulic acid Genistein Caffeic acid Vanillic acid Beta-carotenoidsCholesterol Ferritin Iodine (urine) SeleniumVitamin B12 Vitamin D Vitamin E Folate Homocysteine
Vegans/omnivores: n = 22 / n = 19
Design: Cross-sectional

*1 in females;*2 in males

FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids

Most vegans are aware that a vegan diet is associated with the risk of vitamin B12 deficiency and vitamin B12 is by far their most frequently taken supplement. Based on the vitamin B12 indicator findings, our study did not observe an increased risk of vitamin B12 deficiency among the vegan participants. Most likely, this is due to the high rate of vitamin B12 supplementation among vegans (92%). However, the proportion of dietary supplement users in our study appears to be high compared to those in recent studies from Germany (19, 20) (74% and 81% supplementation rate, respectively) and Denmark (17) (2/3 supplementation rate); only the data of the Finnish cross-sectional study are comparable (supplementation rate of 91%) (16). On the other hand, increased B12 indicator values were found in four vegan participants. Against the backdrop of recent studies about the association between the intake of vitamin B12 supplements and an increased lung cancer risk (21, 22), the intake of vitamin B12 supplements, which was previously regarded as safe, may need to be re-evaluated.

Vitamin B2 is present in larger amounts in animal products; in addition, its absorption from foods of plant origin is lower. In line with our results, recently conducted cross-sectional studies (14, 16, 17) have shown that the absorbed amounts of vitamin B2 tend to be lower in vegans. In the Swiss study (18), vitamin B2 deficiency was diagnosed based on B2 blood levels in one quarter of vegans and 14% der omnivores. However, little is known as yet about the clinical relevance of B2 levels below the cut-off value; further studies are needed to shed light on this question.

Most of the required amount of vitamin D is produced by sun-exposure–dependent endogenous synthesis and only a minor proportion is contributed by nutrition. Since the intake of vitamin D is mainly from animal products, the lower vitamin D uptake among vegans is not surprising. With a vitamin D supplementation rate of 50% among vegans, the rate in our study is rather high compared to other studies (19, 20). Comparable data are only known from the Finnish study which found that serum levels of vitamin D in vegans were 34% lower compared to omnivores, even though in the Finnish study the vitamin D supplementation rate among vegans was with 68% even higher than in our study (16). Without supplementation, a significantly greater proportion of vegans had subnormal 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels compared to omnivores, highlighting the importance of supplementation, especially in a vegan diet.

For many years, calcium deficiency due to the lack of intake of dairy products was regarded as a key risk in vegans (23). Recent studies on calcium uptake have shown conflicting results, with significant differences between vegans and omnivores in some studies (14, 15, 18) and similar calcium intake amounts in others ([16] and in our study). The observation that calcium intake among vegans is higher in recent years compared to older studies is usually attributed to the intake of fortified foodstuffs. However, the evaluation of calcium intake is also more reliable when it includes the corresponding biomarkers. In this context, the lower calcium excretion and the increased PTH levels of nearly every third vegan participant in our study may be interpreted as evidence of a physiological response to low calcium intake.

Especially in the evaluation of iron intake, the importance of using biomarkers is obvious. The bioavailability of iron depends very much on the source of iron, but also on the simultaneous intake of certain secondary plant compounds or of vitamin C. Divalent heme iron from animal products is absorbed two to three times better than trivalent iron from plants. Vitamin C facilitates the absorption of iron, while the simultaneous intake of phytic acid (for example from pulses and grains) or of polyphenols (tea or coffee) reduce the absorption of iron. Iron deficiency is one of the risks associated with a vegan or plant-based diet which is commonly mentioned (9). Signs of iron deficiency were noted in 11% of the vegan participants, which is in line with the results of the two comparable cross-sectional studies from Finnland and Switzerland (16, 18). However, we also observed insufficient iron intake in 8% of the omnivores which is comparable to the findings in the Swiss study (18).

Corresponding to the lower intake of iodine according to the weighed food protocols, iodine excretion in urine was far below the WHO cut-off value for undersupply of iodine (100 µg/L) in three-quarters of the omnivores and almost all vegans (24). Only 5 vegans supplemented iodine (Figure 2, eTable 3). In line with the findings of low iodine intake (16, 17) and iodine undersupply (16, 18, 25) in other recent studies, the results of our study suggest that it is challenging to ensure adequate iodine intake in vegans as there seems to be a lack of awareness of this potential deficiency. Individual monitoring of iodine intake based on iodine excretion is usually not practicable. In line with the literature (26), our study also showed that TSH is not a very sensitive marker—in only four participants with significantly decreased iodine excretion, TSH levels were found increased. Since iodine deficiency is a major cause for the development of goiter, it would need to be considered whether regular clinical assessments of the thyroid should be performed by ultrasound scans (18, 25). Due to the limited availability of natural iodine sources for vegans, it may also be appropriate to recommend iodine supplementation.

In contrast to the study by Schüpbach et al. which found that almost half of the vegans were deficient in zinc (18), we observed lowered zinc concentrations (<60 µg/dL) only in two vegans in our study.

Since selenium has numerous effects on the immune system, thyroid function and the cardiovascular system, and probably also influences carcinogenesis (27, 28), adequate supply of selenium should be ensured. In our study, we used selenoprotein P to assess the selenium status, in addition to the total blood selenium concentrations. As a selenium transport protein, selenoprotein P appears to be well suited as a biomarker to assess the selenium status, especially in patients with low selenium intake (29). Vegans showed lower selenoprotein P levels compared to the omnivores in our study, but also compared to the selenoprotein P levels in the largest European study on nutrition and cancer (The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, EPIC) in which a representative number of selenoprotein P measurements was performed (30). The results indicate a lower selenium intake in vegans compared to omnivores and are consistent with the results of the Finnish cross-sectional study (16). Most studies, however, used the plasma concentration of selenium, a parameter for which we found no difference in our study. Based on the current recommendations for selenium intake, considering 60–70 µg/d as adequate (31), a normal selenium intake is assumed with serum concentrations of >50 µg/L. Selenium supplementation carries the risk of overdosing. According to EFSA, an intake of 300 µg selenium per day is considered acceptable in adults (32).

While vitamin K intake was generally good in both groups, vegans were found to have higher concentrations of vitamin K1 compared to omnivores. Further studies are needed to better understand this finding. Here, the discussion focuses on the positive effect of higher vitamin K1 concentrations on bone health as well as a lower risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (3335).

A special strength of our study is the excellent comparability between vegans and omnivores which was achieved by matching the subjects for age and sex, by the short recruitment period, and by the inclusion criterion of a BMI below 30 kg/m2. Furthermore, our study is notable for its elaborate dietary assessment, using three-day weighed food protocols, and for measuring a wide range of biomarkers. Limitations of our study include: With 72 participants, it is a rather small cross-sectional study with local data collection in the Berlin area. In addition, participants were mainly selected through postings on notice boards (convenience sample). Therefore, the possibility that these participants were particularly health-conscious cannot be excluded. However, since the same recruitment strategy was used for vegans and omnivores and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was chosen as an exclusion criterion, it can be assumed that the level of health consciousness was similar in both groups. Thus, no major differences between the two groups were present with regard to lifestyle characteristics. Consequently, the results of our study provide first insights into the current vitamin and mineral status in vegans versus omnivores in the German population.

Further studies, preferably with longitudinal design and a larger number of participants, are needed to, on the one hand, obtain up-to-date information about the nutritional and health status of a vegan population and, on the other hand, evaluate potential long-term health risks and protective effects.

Supplementary Material

eMethods

Tthe participants of the present (RBVD) study were individuals who had responded to advertisements in (organic/vegan) supermarkets and had contacted the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) via phone or e-mail (n = 161) (figure 1). Following an initial screening by phone, 36 vegans and 36 omnivores (sex-matched and age-matched [to 3 years]) were included in the study (11). The study participants visited the study center twice. During the initial visit, informed consent was obtained and the method of recording the daily food intake (three-day weighed food records) was explained. Also, the container for a 24-h urine collection was handed out to each participant. During the second visit, information about lifestyle factors and the intake of supplements was obtained, besides a physical examination and fasting blood collection.

Determination of basic characteristics, lifestyle factors and dietary data

Information about age, educational attainment and lifestyle factors was collected using tablet-based questionnaires. Trained staff members performed anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Physical activity was determined using the questionnaire of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)–Potsdam study and comprises the total of the average hours per week spent with cycling, sports, or gardening (12). Dietary habits were determined between the first and the second visit, using three-day weighed food protocols on two week days and one weekend day. Participants received a comprehensive introduction, a nutrition diary, and an electronic kitchen scale. Participants were instructed to document for all foodstuffs and beverages detailed information about the time and the place of consumption, brand name, exact product name, packaging, condition at the time of purchase, organic yes/no, weighed quantity and remaining quantity, if any, on the specified days. In addition, participants were asked about their intake of supplements and medications. After completion of the study, the data of the nutrition diaries were entered into the software EAT (University of Paderborn, Version 3.5.5) which assigns a code of the German Nutrient Food Code and Data Base (BLS, Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel, version 3.02) to each food item and calculates the mean daily intake (12).

Power of the study

The sample size was calculated based on the assumption of a clinically relevant difference in bone health of at least 5% (estimated based on differences in the means of broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA]) between vegans and omnivores. At a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, a total of 72 participants (36 vegans, 36 omnivores) was required (G*power, independent-samples t-test).

Statistical analysis

The statistical software suite SAS Enterprise Guide Version 7.13 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., USA) was used for the analysis of the data. All results were reported either as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, separately for the two diets evaluated. Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Accordingly, the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used for continuous variables, while the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Since the two groups matched very well in important characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, energy intake, education, and the recruitment period was short (almost uniform distribution in both groups over the months), no multivariable analyses were performed.

Key messages.

  • The vitamin-B12 status of vegans in this study was largely normal. Given the considerably lower dietary intake, this may be explained by the high vitamin B12 supplementation rate.

  • Based on urinary iodine excretion, the majority of participants showed signs of undersupply which was more severe in vegans compared to omnivores. In the 24-hour urine collection, iodine excretion in 1/3 of vegans was below 20 µg/L, the WHO cut-off value for severe undersupply.

  • In this study, the lower selenoprotein P levels, but not selenium levels, indicated a reduced intake of selenium in vegans compared to omnivores.

  • Despite the significantly higher iron intake of the vegan participants, ferritin levels and blood count changes in both groups were indicative of iron deficiency in every 10th participant in the study.

  • As expected, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were significantly lower in vegans compared to omnivores.

eTable 5. Potentially critical vitamins and minerals in a vegan diet and a selection of food items of plant origin, typically containing large amounts of these vitamins and minerals.

Potentially critical vitamins and minerals in a vegan diet Food items of plant origin with high contents
Vitamin D Some mushrooms
Vitamin B2 Nuts, oilseeds, pulses, various types of vegetables (e.g. broccoli, kale), and whole grains
Calcium Vegetables (e.g. broccoli, kale, rocket salad), nuts, pulses, tofu
Iron Pulses, nuts, oilseeds, whole grains, and various types of vegetable (e.g. spinach, salsifies), berries
Iodine Iodized table salt and food prepared with it, algae*
Zinc Whole grains, pulses, nuts, oilseeds
Selenium Cabbage (e.g. broccoli, white cabbage), bulb vegetables (e.g. garlic, onions), mushrooms, asparagus, pulses
Vitamin B12

This table was modified from to Richter et al. (9). It should be noted that by the consumption of the various food items adequate intake of the respective nutrients is not necessarily ensured.

*Algae may contain iodine in amounts that, when consumed in great quantities, exceed the maximum tolerable intake of iodine per day.

Acknowledgments

Translated from the original German by Ralf Thoene, MD.

Acknowledgement

We thank all participants for their participation in the study. We also thank Elektra Polychronidou for her great commitment in the recruitment of the participants and the conduct of the study. We thank Corinna Genrich and Christel Rozycki for their fast processing of the biospecimens. We extend our thanks to Dr. Mark Lohmann and his expert group for their support in developing the lifestyle questionnaire and Dr. Oliver Lindtner and his expert group for their support in collecting the nutritional data using weighed food protocols. Our special thanks goes to Clarissa Lage-Barbosa and Marjolein Haftenberger (Robert Koch Institute) for their support in analyzing the weighed food protocols.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.Allensbach I. Anzahl der Personen in Deutschland, die sich selbst als Vegetarier einordnen oder als Leute, die weitgehend auf Fleisch verzichten*, von 2014 bis 2019. www.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/173636/umfrage/lebenseinstellung-anzahl-vegetarier/ (last accessed on 1 April 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allensbach I. Personen in Deutschland, die sich selbst als Veganer einordnen oder als Leute, die weitgehend auf tierische Produkte verzichten, in den Jahren 2015 bis 2019. wwwstatista.com/statistik/daten/studie/445155/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zur-anzahl-der-veganer/ (last accessed on 1 April 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets: what do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases? Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1607–1612. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Le LT, Sabate J. Beyond meatless, the health effects of vegan diets: findings from the Adventist cohorts. Nutrients. 2014;6:2131–2147. doi: 10.3390/nu6062131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Orlich MJ, Singh PN, Sabate J, et al. Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1230–1238. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dinu M, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A, Sofi F. Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57:3640–3649. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1138447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leitzmann C. Vegetarian nutrition: past, present, future. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(Suppl 1):496–502. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Richter M, Boeing H, Grünewald-Funk D, et al. Vegan diet. Position of the German Nutrition Society (DGE). Ernahrungs Umschau. 2016;63:92–102. Erratum in 63: M262. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Craig WJ. Health effects of vegan diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1627–1633. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Menzel J, Biemann R, Longree A, et al. Associations of a vegan diet with inflammatory biomarkers. Sci Rep. 2020;10 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58875-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Max-Rubner-Institut. Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel. www.blsdb.de (last accessed on 1 April 2020) [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fedosov SN, Brito A, Miller JW, Green R, Allen LH. Combined indicator of vitamin B12 status: modification for missing biomarkers and folate status and recommendations for revised cut-points. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:1215–1225. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Allés B, Baudry J, Mejean C, et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics between self-reported vegetarians, vegans, and meat-eaters from the NutriNet-Sante Study. Nutrients. 2017;9 doi: 10.3390/nu9091023. pii: E1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clarys P, Deliens T, Huybrechts I, et al. Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diet. Nutrients. 2014;6:1318–1332. doi: 10.3390/nu6031318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elorinne AL, Alfthan G, Erlund I, et al. Food and nutrient intake and nutritional status of finnish vegans and non-vegetarians. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148235. e0148235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kristensen NB, Madsen ML, Hansen TH, et al. Intake of macro- and micronutrients in Danish vegans. Nutr J. 2015;14 doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0103-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schüpbach R, Wegmuller R, Berguerand C, Bui M, Herter-Aeberli I. Micronutrient status and intake in omnivores, vegetarians and vegans in Switzerland. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56:283–293. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1079-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hopp M, Keller T, Lange S, Epp A, Lohmann M, Fleur Böl G. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung. Berlin: 2017. Vegane Ernährung als Lebensstil: Motive und Praktizierung. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vollmer I, Keller M, Kroke A. Vegan diet: utilization of dietary supplements and fortified foods An internet-based survey. Ernahrungs Umschau. 2018;65:144–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brasky TM, White E, Chen CL. Long-term, supplemental, one-carbon metabolism-related vitamin B use in relation to lung cancer risk in the vitamins and lifestyle (VITAL) Cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3440–3448. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ebbing M, Bonaa KH, Nygard O, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality after treatment with folic acid and vitamin B12. JAMA. 2009;302:2119–2126. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Appleby P, Roddam A, Allen N, Key T. Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;611:400–406. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.WHO. World Health Organization. Geneva: 2004. Iodine status worldwide: WHO global database on iodine deficiency. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brantsaeter AL, Knutsen HK, Johansen NC, et al. Inadequate Iodine intake in population groups defined by age, life stage and vegetarian dietary practice in a Norwegian Convenience Sample. Nutrients. 2018;10 doi: 10.3390/nu10020230. pii: E230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zimmermann MB. Iodine deficiency. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:376–408. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rayman MP. Selenium and human health. Lancet. 2012;379:1256–1268. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61452-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schomburg L. The other view: the trace element selenium as a micronutrient in thyroid disease, diabetes, and beyond. Hormones (Athens) 2020;19:15–24. doi: 10.1007/s42000-019-00150-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hurst R, Armah CN, Dainty JR, et al. Establishing optimal selenium status: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:923–931. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hughes DJ, Fedirko V, Jenab M, et al. Selenium status is associated with colorectal cancer risk in the European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition cohort. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:1149–1161. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kipp AP, Strohm D, Brigelius-Flohe R, et al. Revised reference values for selenium intake. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;32:195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.EFSA NDA Panel EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products NaA. Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for selenium. EFSA Journal. 2014;12 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Feskanich D, Weber P, Willett WC, Rockett H, Booth SL, Colditz GA. Vitamin K intake and hip fractures in women: a prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:74–79. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.1.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zwakenberg SR, Burgess S, Sluijs I, et al. Circulating phylloquinone, inactive Matrix Gla protein and coronary heart disease risk: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:1131–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zwakenberg SR, Remmelzwaal S, Beulens JWJ, et al. Circulating phylloquinone concentrations and risk of type 2 diabetes: a mendelian randomization study. Diabetes. 2019;68:220–225. doi: 10.2337/db18-0543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

eMethods

Tthe participants of the present (RBVD) study were individuals who had responded to advertisements in (organic/vegan) supermarkets and had contacted the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) via phone or e-mail (n = 161) (figure 1). Following an initial screening by phone, 36 vegans and 36 omnivores (sex-matched and age-matched [to 3 years]) were included in the study (11). The study participants visited the study center twice. During the initial visit, informed consent was obtained and the method of recording the daily food intake (three-day weighed food records) was explained. Also, the container for a 24-h urine collection was handed out to each participant. During the second visit, information about lifestyle factors and the intake of supplements was obtained, besides a physical examination and fasting blood collection.

Determination of basic characteristics, lifestyle factors and dietary data

Information about age, educational attainment and lifestyle factors was collected using tablet-based questionnaires. Trained staff members performed anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Physical activity was determined using the questionnaire of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)–Potsdam study and comprises the total of the average hours per week spent with cycling, sports, or gardening (12). Dietary habits were determined between the first and the second visit, using three-day weighed food protocols on two week days and one weekend day. Participants received a comprehensive introduction, a nutrition diary, and an electronic kitchen scale. Participants were instructed to document for all foodstuffs and beverages detailed information about the time and the place of consumption, brand name, exact product name, packaging, condition at the time of purchase, organic yes/no, weighed quantity and remaining quantity, if any, on the specified days. In addition, participants were asked about their intake of supplements and medications. After completion of the study, the data of the nutrition diaries were entered into the software EAT (University of Paderborn, Version 3.5.5) which assigns a code of the German Nutrient Food Code and Data Base (BLS, Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel, version 3.02) to each food item and calculates the mean daily intake (12).

Power of the study

The sample size was calculated based on the assumption of a clinically relevant difference in bone health of at least 5% (estimated based on differences in the means of broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA]) between vegans and omnivores. At a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, a total of 72 participants (36 vegans, 36 omnivores) was required (G*power, independent-samples t-test).

Statistical analysis

The statistical software suite SAS Enterprise Guide Version 7.13 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., USA) was used for the analysis of the data. All results were reported either as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, separately for the two diets evaluated. Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Accordingly, the Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used for continuous variables, while the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Since the two groups matched very well in important characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, energy intake, education, and the recruitment period was short (almost uniform distribution in both groups over the months), no multivariable analyses were performed.


Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES