Abstract
Background
The present study was designed to investigate the antigiardial efficacy of low metronidazole dose loaded-D.L-lactide-co-glycolide (LMD-PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) and to compare it with the standard high dose of metronidazole either free (HMD) or loaded on PLGA (HMD-PLGA).
Materials and Methods
PLGA NPs were prepared by single emulsification method, metronidazole (MTZ) was loaded in low and high doses. The nanoparticles were evaluated in vivo for mice model. The Giardia intestinalis infected mice were treated by LMD and HMD either free or PLGA NPs loaded, the parasitic load and ployclonal antigiardial serum antibodies (IgG and IgA) were recorded. Histopathological studies on intestinal and liver sections were applied.
Results
MTZ-PLGA NPs was successfully prepared with 81.68% encapsulation efficiency and with an average particle size of approximately 228.00 ± 43.19 nm and -32.28 ± 0.07 mV Zeta potential. Experimentally, it was observed that Giardia intestinalis infected animals administered with LMD-PLGA had completely eliminated cyst shedding and trophozoite count compared with Giardia-infected mice. Further, it was found that animals belonging to LMD-PLGA group had significantly reduced levels of antigiardial IgA (0.99 ± 0.05) antibodies in serum compared with Giardia-infected. Histopathologyically, also animals belonging to LMD-PLGA treated group had intact mucosal epithelium lining, and normal villi with no detection of G. intestinalis trophozoites. In addition to the less toxic effect on the liver tissue compared to free HMD, HMD-PLGA and infected-untreated groups using Ishak grading system.
Conclusion
Our study showed that PLGA nanoparticles could be atrial delivery systems for antigiardial drugs to improve their therapeutic efficacy and minimize their side effects that results from frequent dosing.
Keywords: Giardia intestinalis, Metronidazole, PLGA nanoparticles
Introduction
Giardia intestinalis is the causal agent of giardiasis which is an intestinal infection correlated with poverty and poor drinking water quality. Giardia infections affect nearly 33% of people in developing countries, 2% of the adult population in the developed world, and treatment options are limited according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention [1]. Giardia infection causes enterocytes damage and loss of brush border of the epithelial cells of the intestine that leads to shortening of microvilli and altered epithelial barrier function. Drug resistance to common antigiardial agents and incidence of treatment failures have increased in recent years. [1]. Standard treatment for giardiasis is commonly with 5-nitroimidazole (5-NI) compounds, or metronidazole (MDZ), but a growing number of refractory cases were being reported [2]. Clinicians are increasingly falling back on second-line and less well-known drugs to treat giardiasis [3]. However, these compounds present side effects associated with residual toxicity in the host. Dose-dependent side effects include leukopenia, headache, vertigo, nausea, insomnia, irritability, metallic taste, and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity [4]. Drug resistance to common antigiardial agents and the incidence of treatment failures have increased in recent years. Therefore, the search for new molecular targets for drugs against Giardia infection is essential [1] and a combination of two or more drugs may be a viable approach [3].
Nanoparticles have become highly attractive for their applications in the fields of medicine and biology in the last few years [5].
The polymer-based nanoparticle is prepared from natural or synthetic polymers and can deliver wide kinds of drugs. Nanoparticles permit a targeted direction to a particular cell or organs or controlled drug delivery [6]. By encapsulating these molecules inside a nano-carrier, the stability and solubility of drugs can be enhanced, providing a chance to re-evaluate the therapeutic potential of drugs because of poor pharmacokinetics [7].
Poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) is considered as one of the most successfully used biodegradable polymers due to its hydrolysis leads to metabolite monomers, lactic acid and glycolic acid. As these two monomers are endogenous and simply metabolized by the body through the Krebs cycle, negligible systemic toxicity is associated with the use of PLGA for drug delivery or biomaterial applications [8,9]. PLGA has a long-standing track record in biomedical functions and well-documented utility for continued drug release in comparison with the conventional devices up to days, weeks or months, and ease of parenteral administration by injection [8].
PLGA-NPs speedily escape the endo-lysosomes and enter the cytoplasm in 10 min of incubation. This helps interactions of nanoparticles with the vesicular membranes leading to a transient and localized deterioration of the membrane resulting in the escape of nanoparticles into the cytosol [9]. It is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicine Agency (EMA) in different drug delivery systems in humans. The polymers are commercially attainable with diverse molecular weights and copolymer compositions. Relying on the molecular weight and copolymer ratio the degradation time can differ from several months to several years [9]. PLGA had proved improvement of the therapeutic efficacy of other antiparasitic drugs [10]. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of MDZ-PLGA NPs as antigiardial treatment to reduce the MDZ dose from (120 mg/kg) to (60 mg/kg) to reduce the possible side effects.
Material and Methods
1. Drugs
1) Metronidazole (MDZ)
MDZ (FLAGYL, Cairo, Egypt) was supplied Sanofi-Aventis Egypt, as suspension. It was administrated in high dose (120 mg/kg) [11] and low dose (60 mg/kg).
2) Preparation of Nanoparticle (NPs)
PLGA with a copolymer ratio of D,L-lactide to glycolide of 50:50 (Mw 40,000 - 100,000 g/mol as indicated by the supplier, Sigma Chemical CO, St. Louis, MO, USA). The NPs prepared from single emulsification process [12] with poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) (87 - 89% hydrolysis degree and molecular mass 12,000 - 13,000 g/mol, Sigma Chemical CO, USA). The organic solvent was methylene chloride (Labsynth Ltd., Sao Paulo, Brazil). As suspending medium, purified water (Milli-Q, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) was used. MDZ was encapsulated either in a high dose (120 mg/kg) or in a low dose (60 mg/kg).
2. Characterization of NPs
1) Particle size and zeta potential
The mean diameter of PLGA NPs in aqueous dispersion was measured utilizing a laser particle analyzer (LAP 3100, Otsuka Electronics, Osaka, Japan) with a photon correlator (LPA 300, Otsuka Electronics). When the diameter was expected to exceed 1 mm, a laser-based time-of transition system (Cis-1, Galai Production Ltd, Israel) was used. Zeta potential was measured using a clear zeta cell.
2) Entrapment efficiency
Entrapment efficiency of MDZ-PLGA NPs was evaluated according to Stolnik et al. [12]. The supernatant and washing solutions from purification were collected. The drug content was then determined in supernatant and washing solutions spectrophotometrically. The entrapment efficiencies (%EE) of NPs were determined according to the following equation:
All measurements were taken in triplicate.
3. Assessment of antigiardial efficacy:
1) Experimental animals
Laboratory bred male, Swiss albino mice strain (weighing 18 - 20 g), were purchased from Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt. Experimental animals were maintained for 8 weeks at (21 ± 2°C) and fed dry food (contain 24% protein). The experimental protocols used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC); Cairo University, Faculty of Science, Egypt (CUIS/26/16). All the experimental procedures were performed according to the internationally valid guidelines.
2) Extraction of Giardia from stool
G. intestinalis cysts used for infection of mice were obtained from diarrheic patients referred to the outpatient clinic of TBRI. The stool samples of infected patients were collected in sterile clean stool cups. The samples chosen for cyst purification were not only with the highest cysts rate (more than 8 cysts in each microscopic field with the magnification of × 40) but they were also without any other gastrointestinal parasite or yeast contaminations. After collection of stool samples, homogeneous suspensions in 0.2 M PBS buffer were made that then purified and centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min and the sediments were the subject to purification by modified two-phase sucrose purification method [13].
3) Animal infection
The mice were infected by oral inoculation with the isolated G. intestinalis cysts in a dose of about 10,000 ± 1 cysts/mouse [14].
Animals were divided into the following groups.
Group 1: Negative-control (normal).
Group 2: Positive-control (G. intestinalis infected- untreated group).
Group 3 (LMD): G. intestinalis infected then treated with low MDZ dose (60 mg/kg) for five consecutive days post infection.
Group 4 (HMD): G. intestinalis infected and then treated with high MDZ dose (120 mg/kg) for five consecutive days post infection [11].
Group 5 (PLGA): G. intestinalis infected and then treated with PLGA NPs only for five consecutive days post infection.
Group 6 (PLGA-LMD): G. intestinalis infected and then treated with low MDZ dose (60 mg/kg) loaded on PLGA NPs for five consecutive days post infection.
Group 7 (PLGA-HMD): G. intestinalis infected and then treated with high MDZ dose (120 mg/kg) loaded on PLGA NPs for five consecutive days post infection.
Animals were anesthetized by xylene ketamine 100 mg/kg (4 weeks post infections). Blood was collected individually from Jugular vein. Blood was allowed to stand for 1hr at 37ºC, then overnight at 4ºC and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 15 min (80-1 Electric Centrifuge). The serum was obtained and kept in aliquots at -20ºC for immunoglobulin assay.
4) Parasitological examination
Stool samples were examined to all groups to detect G. intestinalis cysts to insure the establishment of the infection. Samples were examined using direct smear and Merthiolate-iodine-formaldhyde concentration technique (MIFc) [15].
5) Histopathological studies
Immediately after blood collection, the animals were dissected. Liver and small intestine tissue samples were collected from all mice within the different groups to evaluate the pathological changes according to Drury [16]. Grading of necroinflammation in liver was evaluated according to Ishak scoring system [17]; which assign numbers to the severity of the necroinflammatory features (interface hepatitis, confluent necrosis, parenchymal injury and portal inflammation) and add the numbers to arrive at a grade that can range from 0 to 18.
6) Immunological parameter
Measurement of serum polyclonal antigiardial IgG antibody and IgA antibody by the Enzyme Linked Immune Sorbent Assay (ELISA). Assays were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma Chemical CO, USA).
4. Statistical analysis
The present data were analyzed by IBM SPSS version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse the effect of treatment on the studied parameters. Duncan's test of homogeneity was used to test the similarities between the experimental groups. Correlation coefficient and regression analyses were used to fit the relationships between the studied variables. All the results were expressed as a mean ± standard error of mean (SE).
Results
1. Characterization of PLGA NPs
PLGA NPs were prepared by single emulsion method. The average particle size of MTZ-PLGA NPs was 228 ± 43.19 nm. The external morphology of the nanoparticles studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed that nanoparticles were approximately spherical in shape having a smooth surface. Zeta potential was -32.28 ± 0.07 mV and the %EE was 81.68%.
2. Quantification of cysts before (2 weeks post infection) and after treatment (4 weeks post infection)
The infection was confirmed in all groups inoculated with G. intestinalis and the cysts count in 1 g of stool before the different treatments was recorded in Figure 1. The parasitic load of G. intestinalis in mice showed a significant reduction four weeks post infection (p.i.) in all infected treated groups as compared with infected non treated ones. The treatment with LMD induced (74.76%) (P <0.0001) cyst reduction, but a stronger reduction was encountered with the HMD (98.67%) (P <0.0001). The treatment with PLGA was associated with (57.14%) (P <0.05) reduction in cysts number. On the other hand, the administration of HMD-PLGA showed 86.85% cyst count. Interestingly, the LMD-PLGA group recorded a complete eradication of cysts in stool with 100% cyst reduction.
Figure 1. (A) The oocysts count /1 gram stool. (B) The PR of oocysts count before and after the treatment with free LMD and HMD or loaded on PLGA Nanoparticles in Giardia intestinalis infected mice, 2 weeks post-treatment.
a,b Represent significant difference as compared to the corresponding value before treatment, at (P <0.05) and (P <0.0001), respectively. PR is in relation to the corresponding infected untreated group.
PR, percentage reduction; LMD, low metronidazole dose; HMD, high metronidazole dose; PLGA, D,L-lactide-co-glycolide.
1) Trophozoite count
Trophozoites of G. intestinalis were counted along mucosal surface of the small intestine in all the infected-treated groups and compared to the infected untreated group (Table 1). A significant reduction in trophozoite count was recorded in intestinal tissue following the treatment with LMD (87.2%), and a higher reduction (93.44%) (P <0.05) was obtained following HMD treatment. The administration of the high metronidazole dose but loaded on PLGA nanoparticles (HMD-PLGA) lowered the trophozoite reduction (87.52%), this was not statistically significant as compared to the HMD group (93.44%). The maximal anti-giardial effect and the complete cure were ecorded in the LMD-PLGA group as the treatment was concurrent with (100.00%) reduction of trophozoite count.
Table 1. Effect of free (low and high dose) of metronidazole or loaded on poly (L-lactic acid) copolymer with glycolic acid (PLGA) Nanoparticles on Giardia intestinalis trophozoite count in the small intestine, 4 weeks post infection and 2 weeks after treatment.
| Trophozoite reduction | ||
|---|---|---|
| Group | Number of trophozoites/gram tissue (mean ± SE) | Reduction (%) |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00a | - |
| Infected-untreated | 31.69 ± 4.07b | - |
| LMD | 4.05 + 0.06a | 87.20 |
| HMD | 2.08 ± 0.08a | 93.44 |
| PLGA | 10.76 ± 1.05c | 66.04 |
| LMD-PLGA | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 |
| HMD-PLGA | 3.96 ± 0.36a | 87.52 |
% represents percentage reduction as compared to the infected-untreated group. Means followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different (P >0.05) whereas those marked with different ones are significantly differed (P <0.05).
SE, standard error; LMD, low metronidazole dose; HMD, high metronidazole dose; PLGA, D.L-lactide-co-glycolide.
3. Histopathological examination
Histopathological examination of small intestine sections as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Liver sections from all the studied groups were examined and evaluated according to Ishak score (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 2). HMD-PLGA was the group that recorded maximal liver injury (grade 6).
4. Measurement of serum IgA and IgG levels by ELISA
Serum levels of IgA and IgG antibody against soluble G. intestinalis antigen were measured 4 weeks p.i. by ELISA (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Serum levels of antigiardial IgA and IgG immunoglobulin antibodies in response to the different treatments.
Date are presented as (mean ± SE) of OD.
a (P <0.05) significance versus infected untreated group.
b (P <0.05) significance versus LMD group [ANOVA].
IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; OD, optical density LMD, low metronidazole dose; HMD, high metronidazole dose; PLGA, D.L-lactide-co-glycolide.
Normal controls showed no detectable levels of IgA and IgG antibodies against G. intestinalis (0.25 ± 0.01 and 0.40 ± 0.03, respectively). The levels of serum IgA and IgG for G. lintestinalis infected-untreated group were significantly elevated (1.93 ± 0.07 and 2.93 ± 0.07, P <0.05) as compared to the normal control group. After the treatment with LMD, a significant decrease in the OD values for IgA (1.11 ± 0.02) and IgG (2.33 ± 0.04) antibody levels were recorded (P <0.05). The decrease in IgA and IgG levels was also significant in HMD group (1.09 ± 0.09 and 2.15 ± 0.06, P <0.05) as compared to the infected–untreated control. In contrast, infected mice receiving only PLGA treatment alone did not elicit significant change in serum antigiardial IgA and IgG responses (P >0.05) (1.63 ± 0.08 and 2.65 ± 0.24, respectively) in comparison to infected-untreated mice. The IgA and IgG response of infected mice treated with LMD-PLGA (0.99 ± 0.05 and 2.02 ± 0.05) was comparable to that of the infected mice treated with HMD (1.09 ± 0.05 and 2.15 ± 0.06, respectively) with no significant difference between them (P >0.05).
The treatment of infected mice with HMD-PLGA also demonstrated a significant reduction of IgA and IgG levels (1.37 ± 0.07 and 1.37 ± 0.07, P <0.05) as compared to both the infected-untreated and infected-HMD treated groups.
Discussion
Infection with G. intestinalis is one of the most common human infections, particularly in developing countries; the infection affects mainly preschool and school children. It contributes to increased mortality in the immunocompromised patients [17]. Several families of drugs with good efficacy are used for Giardia treatment, but sometimes dosing regimens are suboptimal and emerging resistance begins to question their clinical value. Moreover, some of these drugs can cause side effects that result in patient discomfort and low adherence to the treatment [18]. MDZ is the central drug of giardiasis therapy; however, it has dose-related CNS toxicity [19]. MDZ has been listed by the United States national toxicology program (NTP) as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen according to WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IAR) [20]. The standard metronidazole therapy is (250 - 500 mg/day × 5 - 10 days) with 60 - 95% efficacy [21]. Bezagio et al. [22] suggested a MDZ therapeutic protocol that was able to maintain the animals free of infection for at least 10 days using (500 mg/kg 3 times a day for 7 days). While a (500 mg/kg once a day for 7 days) therapy failed to completely eliminate the parasite load in infected mice. 120 mg/kg MDZ is the breakpoint below which treatment failure was recorded [21]. So, we applied this dose as the high MDZ dose for the treatment of giardiasis in our model. Furthermore, we tested the validity of the dose reduction to the half (60 mg/kg) in order to minimize MDZ side effects mentioned above.
In the present work MDZ-PLGA NPs were successfully prepared using single emulsification method [12]. MDZ-PLGA NPs sizes observed in our study were smaller than that reported by Singh & Jain [23]. Furthermore, in earlier study Periglaucine A and Betulinic acid were loaded on PLGA NPs with 100 - 500 nm average particle size [10] that was comparable to our result. The ideal range for nanoparticles for drug delivery was found to be from 10 nm to 300 nm otherwise will be eliminated from circulation [24]. The zeta potential and surface charge are also important factors that affect the stability and cell adhesion properties of NPs. The greater the absolute zeta potential is the greater the stability of the NPs. In the present work, MDZ-PLGA NPs recorded a negative zeta potential which can be attributed to the carboxyl on free PLGA-NPs that reported previously [25]. The entrapment efficiency (81.68%) was higher than that reported by Singh & Jain [23] which was approximately (70.30%) and lower than that observed by Mahboob et al. (98.24%) [10].
At the end of the treatment protocol, both the HMD and the LMD were able to reduce the cyst quantity in stool samples and the trophozoite count. The treatment with MTZ as 120 mg/kg twice daily for 5 successive days was also tested by Aly et al. [11] who recorded (93.9 and 94.2%, respectively) and Fahmy et al. [26] who recorded (93.23 and 92.15%, respectively) reduction rates of cysts and trophozoite count, respectively. As infectivity dose of giardiasis may be as low as ten cysts in contaminated food or drinks [27], the MDZ based treatment applied in this study (HMD or LMD) may be associated with recurrence of infection as it wasn't able to completely eliminate the parasite from the intestine.
NPs have recently gained interest in various biomedical fields. NPs containing therapeutic agents have been used for site-targeted drug delivery and optimization of drug treatment effects [28]. PLGA NPs have several advantages over other natural and synthetic polymers; it is biocompatible, it can be used to synthesize nano/micro-particles with good physico-chemical properties [29]. In this study, we attempted to develop LMD-PLGA and HMD-PLGA nanoparticles and to examine their in vivo antigiardial activity and to compare it with the data obtained after the treatment with free high (HMD) and low (LMD) and metronidazole doses at 120 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg, respectively.
The study showed an improvement in antigiardial activity using the LMD-PLGA formulation at lower concentration (60 mg/kg) when compared to unloaded LMD. The LMD-PLGA treatment was 100% efficient with the complete elimination of the parasite cysts and trophozoites. The sustained release and prolonged circulation of MDZ-PLGA NPs in addition to improved bioavailability and absorption influenced by the small particle size could have been responsible for this observation. This is similar to a report on curcumin PLGA-encapsulated nanoparticles and on Periglaucine A and Betulinic acid when encapsulated in PLGA NPs [10] which also observed better drug efficacy at lower concentrations when encapsulated with PLGA NPs. The targeted delivery applied using LMD-PLGA may result in a higher concentration of MDZ in intestine, thus simultaneously reducing the total dose administration. So that, cytotoxicity and the probable carcinogenic effects when high concentrations of MDZ were used [30] can be avoided using the LMD-PLGA.
Histopathological examination revealed that preserved villi, reduced chronic inflammatory infiltrate of the lamina propria and the complete elimination of G. intestinalis trophozoites were detected with the LMD-PLGA therapy. Ishak scoring system, a very sensitive system to evaluate liver necroinflammation, was also applied as a very good way to indicate the differences in histological response after applying different forms of therapy and to predict any probable disease progression in liver tissue [17]. Using Ishak, the worst liver condition was observed in (HMD-PLGA) group, this confirmed the hepatotoxic effect of prolonged MDZ high dose that was recorded in earlier studies [31]. On the other hand, the LMD-PLGA administration had a less toxic effect on the liver tissue.
The antibody-mediated clearance of G. intestinalis infections is suggested to involve prevention of trophozoite attachment to the host intestinal epithelium and also changes in the trophozoite morphology which causes their killing [32]. Secretory antibodies like IgM and IgA isotypes are attractive nominees for immune defense against Giardia, because they are secreted in huge quantities into the intestinal lumen and their actions are antigen-specific. Antigiardial IgA is important for controlling and eliminating Giardia infection. Giardia infection leads to a prolonged elevation specific antigiardia IgG response that lasts for many weeks or months [33].
As quantitative and qualitative serum antibody response against G. intestinalis infection could be used to the assess success of new chemotherapy [34]. Analysis by ELISA, of both IgA and IgG serum levels in the infected groups after the different forms of MDZ treatments recorded a significant reduction in OD values from infected mice. The 100% cure rate in LMD-PLGA treated group was associated with the maximal reduction of IgA specific antibody response. The reduction level of IgA in LMD-PLGA treated group was not significantly different from that of HMD treated group. This finding suggests an enhanced and more sustained effect of the tested drug candidate (LMD-PLGA) over a longer time even with minimizing the MDZ dose to its half (60 mg/kg). The reduction of the IgA level was possibly linked to a reduction in antigen load as a consequence of parasite elimination from intestine [34]. In the present study, IgA antibody response to Giardia remained significantly higher than that in the unexposed controls even after the infection has been cleared. This was also reported in previous studies [34,35,36].
In this preliminary study IgG antibody level was significantly elevated after the infection. Such elevation of G. intestinalis specific serum IgG after infection is reported in several previous studies [37,38]. Also, G. intestinalis specific serum IgG was slightly decreased after the different treatments. Jiménez et al. [34] also suggested that the evaluation of specific IgG levels is not a suitable tool for monitoring the humoral response to infection with G. intestinalis after chemotherapy. On the other hand, our result was in disagreement with Priest et al. [39] work which reported that serologic IgG level is correlated better than IgA with Giardia infection condition.
The present work suggested the efficacy of the PLGA NPs as a delivery system that could help in the reduction of MDZ dose for the treatment of G. intestinalis.
In conclusion PLGA NPs were prepared and effectively loaded with LMD (60 mg/kg) and HMD (120 mg/kg). The antigiardial effect of LMD-PLGA and HMD-PLGA NPs were compared to that of free LMD and HMD. The LMD-PLGA nanoparticles could provide a basis for better drug delivery systems rather than free HMD or even HMD-PLGA NPs to make target-specific drugs and may be developed as a promising antigiardial agent that needs further studies.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest.
- Conceptualization: IR, AEA.
- Data curation: NAM.
- Investigation: HN.
- Methodology: AE.
- Supervision: AEA.
- Writing - original draft: NAM.
- Writing - review & editing: NAM.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
The evaluation of the liver necroinflammation level in the different groups according to Ishak grade
References
- 1.Palomo-Ligas L, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez F, Ochoa-Maganda VY, Cortés-Zárate R, Charles-Niño CL, Castillo-Romero A. Identification of a novel potassium channel (GiK) as a potential drug target in Giardia lamblia: Computational descriptions of binding sites. Peer J. 2019;7:e6430. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tejman-Yarden N, Eckmann L. New approaches to the treatment of giardiasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:451–456. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834ad401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Escobedo AA, Almirall P, Chirino E, Pacheco F, Duque A, Avila I. Treatment of refractory paediatric giardiasis using secnidazole plus albendazole: a case series. Infez Med. 2018;26:379–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ansell BR, McConville MJ, Ma'ayeh SY, Dagley MJ, Gasser RB, Svärd SG, Jex AR. Drug resistance in Giardia duodenalis. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:888–901. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu W, Ling P, Zhang T. Polymeric micelles, a promising drug delivery system to enhance bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. J Drug Deliv. 2013;2013:340315. doi: 10.1155/2013/340315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hillaireau H, Couvreur P. Nanocarriers' entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:2873–2896. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0053-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hans ML, Lowman A. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2002;6:319–327. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mahapatro A, Singh DK. Biodegradable nanoparticles are excellent vehicle for site directed in-vivo delivery of drugs and vaccines. J Nanobiotechnology. 2011;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dinarvand R, Sepehri N, Manoochehri S, Rouhani H, Atyabi F. Polylactide-co-glycolide nanoparticles for controlled delivery of anticancer agents. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:877–895. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S18905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mahboob T, Nawaz M, Tian-Chye T, Samudi C, Wiart C, Nissapatorn V. Preparation of Poly (DL-Lactide-co-Glycolide) nanoparticles encapsulated with periglaucine A and betulinic acid for in vitro anti-Acanthamoeba and cytotoxicity activities. Pathogens. 2018;7:62. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7030062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aly EM, Sabry HY, Fahmy ZH, Zalat RS. Efficacy of combination therapy (metronidazole and/or artemether) in experimental giardiasis and its impact on nonenzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers. Parasitol United J. 2014;7:68–74. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Niwa T, Takeuchi H, Hino T, Kunou N, Kawashima Y. Preparation of biodegradable nanoparticles of water-soluble and insoluble drugs with D, L-lactide/glycolide copolymer by a novel spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method, and the drug release behavior. J Control Release. 1993;25:89–98. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Walderich B, Müller L, Bracha R, Knobloch J, Burchard GD. A new method for isolation and differentiation of native Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar cysts from fecal samples. Parasitol Res. 1997;83:719–721. doi: 10.1007/s004360050326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Genkinger JM, Loffredo CA, Singer SM. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of albendazole compared with metronidazole as treatments for infections with Giardia duodenalis . PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blagg W, Schloegel EL, Mansour NS, Khalaf GI. A new concentration technic for the demonstration of protozoa and helminth eggs in feces. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1955;4:23–28. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1955.4.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Drury RAB. Histopathological stains and their diagnostic uses. J Clin Pathol. 1975;2:841. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, Denk H, Desmet V, Korb G, MacSween RNM, Phillips MJ, Portmann BG, Poulsen H, Scheuer PJ, Schmid M, Thaler H. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995;22:696–699. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vivancos V, González-Alvarez I, Bermejo M, Gonzalez-Alvarez M. Giardiasis: characteristics, pathogenesis and new insights about treatment. Curr Top Med Chem. 2018;18:1287–1303. doi: 10.2174/1568026618666181002095314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Walker S. Small animal toxicology. 3rd edition. Can Vet J. 2014;55:844. [Google Scholar]
- 20.National Toxicology Program. NTP 12th report on carcinogens. Rep Carcinog. 2011;12:iii-499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lemée V, Zaharia I, Nevez G, Rabodonirina M, Brasseur P, Ballet JJ, Favennec L. Metronidazole and albendazole susceptibility of 11 clinical isolates of Giardia duodenalis from France. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:819–821. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.5.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bezagio RC, Colli CM, Romera LI, Ferreira ÉC, Falavigna-Guilherme AL, Gomes ML. Synergistic effects of fenbendazole and metronidazole against Giardia muris in Swiss mice naturally infected. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:939–944. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5367-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singh M, Jain G. Development of sodium alginate coated nanoparticles of metronidazole for the treatment of periodontitis. Int J App Pharm. 2019;11:105–110. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kobayashi H, Watanabe R, Choyke PL. Improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects; what is the appropriate target? Theranostics. 2014;4:81–89. doi: 10.7150/thno.7193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lu B, Lv X, Le Y. Chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles for control-released drug delivery. Polymers (Basel) 2019;11:304. doi: 10.3390/polym11020304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fahmy ZH, Aly E, Shalsh I, Mohamed AH. The effect of medium chain saturated fatty acid (monolaurin) on levels of the cytokines on experimental animal in Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia infection. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2014;8:106–114. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pereira M, Atwill ER, Barbosa AP. Prevalence and associated risk factors for Giardia lamblia infection among children hospitalized for diarrhea in Goiânia, Goiás State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2007;49:139–145. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000300002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barzegar-Jalali M, Alaei-Beirami M, Javadzadeh Y, Mohammadi G, Hamidi A, Andalib S, Adibkia K. Comparison of physicochemical characteristics and drug release of diclofenac sodium–eudragit® RS100 nanoparticles and solid dispersions. Powder Technol. 2012;219:211–216. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aina A, Gupta M, Boukari Y, Morris A, Billa N, Doughty S. Monitoring model drug microencapsulation in PLGA scaffolds using X-ray powder diffraction. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24:227–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bendesky A, Menéndez D, Ostrosky-Wegman P. Is metronidazole carcinogenic? Mutat Res. 2002;511:133–144. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(02)00007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Grace EO, Anyabolu AE, Ofoego UC, Okafor IA. A histological studies of the ameliorative effect of turmeric (curcuma longa) on the liver of metronidazole-treated albino wistar rats. World J Pharm Sci. 2015;4:311–320. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jenkins MC, O'Brien CN, Murphy C, Schwarz R, Miska K, Rosenthal B, Trout JM. Antibodies to the ventral disc protein δ-giardin prevent in vitro binding of Giardia lamblia trophozoites. J Parasitol. 2009;95:895–899. doi: 10.1645/GE-1851R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sullivan PB, Neale G, Cevallos AM, Farthing MJ. Evaluation of specific serum anti-Giardia IgM antibody response in diagnosis of giardiasis in children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:748–749. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90442-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jiménez JC, Pinon A, Dive D, Capron M, Dei-Cas E, Convit J. Antibody response in children infected with Giardia intestinalis before and after treatment with secnidazole. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:11–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bajeva UK, Warhust DC. Humoral response in giardiasis. J Commun Dis. 1983;15:256–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hjøllo T, Bratland E, Steinsland H, Radunovic M, Langeland N, Hanevik K. Longitudinal cohort study of serum antibody responses towards Giardia lamblia variant-specific surface proteins in a non-endemic area. Exp Parasitol. 2018;191:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2018.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Birkhead G, Janoff EN, Vogt RL, Smith PD. Elevated levels of immunoglobulin A to Giardia lamblia during a waterborne outbreak of gastroenteritis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1707–1710. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1707-1710.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shukla G, Kaur T, Sehgal R, Rishi P, Prabha V. Protective potential of L. acidophilus in murine giardiasis. Cent Eur J Med. 2010;5:456–463. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Priest JW, Moss DM, Visvesvara GS, Jones CC, Li A, Isaac-Renton JL. Multiplex assay detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies that recognize Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium parvum antigens. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:1695–1707. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00160-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The evaluation of the liver necroinflammation level in the different groups according to Ishak grade


