Skip to main content
FEBS Open Bio logoLink to FEBS Open Bio
. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):35–47. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13032

Delivery of a mitochondria‐targeted antioxidant from biocompatible, polymeric nanofibrous scaffolds

Yasaman Hamedani 1, Rayane Brinck Teixeira 2, Catherine Karbasiafshar 2, Peter Wipf 3,4,5, Sankha Bhowmick 1, M Ruhul Abid 2,
PMCID: PMC7780095  PMID: 33179452

Using electrospinning, we fabricated a biocompatible nanofibrous scaffold with mitochondrial antioxidant JP4‐039. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy tracked an initial burst release of JP4‐039 within the first 20 min followed by a sustained release over 72 h. The released drug reduced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and induced migration and tube formation in human coronary artery endothelial cells, suggesting therapeutic potential of the implants.

graphic file with name FEB4-11-35-g007.jpg

Keywords: biopolymer, drug delivery, electrospinning, endothelial cells, mitochondrial antioxidants, nanofibrous scaffold

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease has been associated with increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Recently, we have shown that a critical balance between cytosolic ROS and mitochondrial ROS is crucial in cardiovascular health and that modulation of mitochondrial ROS helps prevent detrimental effects of cytosolic ROS on endothelial cells (EC) in transgenic animals. Here, we report the development of a controlled delivery system for a mitochondria‐targeted antioxidant, JP4‐039, from an electrospun scaffold made of FDA‐approved biocompatible polymeric nanofibers. We demonstrate that the active antioxidant moiety was preserved in released JP4‐039 for over 72 h using electron paramagnetic resonance. We also show that both the initial burst release of the drug within the first 20 min and the ensuing slow and sustained release that occurred over the next 24 h improved tube formation in human coronary artery ECs (HCAEC) in vitro. Taken together, these findings suggest that electrospinning methods can be used to upload mitochondrial antioxidant (JP4‐039) onto a biocompatible nanofibrous PLGA scaffold, and the uploaded drug (JP4‐039) retains nitroxide antioxidant properties upon release from the scaffold, which in turn can reduce mitochondrial ROS and improve EC function in vitro.


Abbreviations

EC

endothelial cell

EPR

electron paramagnetic resonance

FTIR

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

JP4‐039

4‐[[(3E,5S)‐5‐[[(1,1‐dimethylethoxy)carbonyl]amino]‐7‐methyl‐1‐oxo‐3‐octen‐1‐yl]amino]‐2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐piperidinyloxy

MI

myocardial infarction

PLGA

polylactide‐co‐glycolide acid

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

TFE

2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol

Cardiovascular disease, including ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction (MI), is the leading cause of death in the world. One of the major consequences of MI is death of cardiomyocytes leading to cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, and heart failure [1]. There are major efforts undergoing to improve blood supply to the ischemic myocardium by inducing the growth or sprouting of new blood vessels, that is, angiogenesis, from the existing coronary vessels. Recent work from our laboratory and others showed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a major role in determining coronary vascular endothelial cell (EC) proliferation, migration, and tube formation in vitro [2, 3, 4, 5]. ECs have several intracellular sources for ROS, including membrane‐bound NADPH oxidases, mitochondria, peroxisome, and cytochrome P450 [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Whereas the increase in ROS is believed to be harmful for the cardiovascular system, the use of global antioxidants to eliminate excessive ROS has resulted in increased mortality [13]. A recent report from our laboratory demonstrated that the detrimental effects of a chronic increase in ROS can be abrogated by specific reduction in the levels of mitochondrial ROS in ECs [14]. Although ECs are dependent on glycolysis, not oxidative phosphorylation, for its ATP synthesis, mitochondria play an important role in fatty acid oxidation‐dependent nucleotide synthesis that is required for EC proliferation [15]. Mitochondrial ROS balance is critical for maintenance of membrane potential, which is crucial for mitochondrial function. Thus, regulating mitochondrial ROS in EC insures the optimal function of mitochondria. Taken together, it appears that targeted delivery of antioxidants to mitochondria may help maintain EC health during oxidative stress. Achieving appropriate EC health by modulating mitochondrial ROS would insure coronary angiogenesis in ischemic myocardium and thus would help recover cardiac function in myocardial ischemia or the post‐MI heart. In recent years, there has been a great interest in developing antioxidants which are capable of targeting mitochondria and providing their radical scavenging activity inside the matrix to reduce mitochondrial ROS [16, 17, 18, 19]. JP4‐039 is one such derivative with a delivery core based on the antibiotic gramicidin S, targeting the lipid bilayer of the mitochondrial membrane. JP4‐039 enters the matrix and provides radical and electron scavenging activity by virtue of its nitroxide radical containing 4‐amino‐TEMPO payload [20, 21]. Moreover, JP4‐039 has demonstrated efficacy as a radiation protector and mitigator in quiescent cells [22], in a mouse model of radiation‐induced skin damage by reducing ROS in mitochondria [23], and as radical protector for colony‐forming unit‐granulocyte‐erythroid‐megakaryocyte‐monocytes [24].

Recent studies have shown the critical requirement of basal ROS levels in ECs to provide cardioprotection as well as differentiation and excitation‐contraction coupling for cardiomyocytes [1, 14]. Our previous study using ECs demonstrated that a critical timed reduction in mitochondrial ROS improved endothelial function and proliferation during oxidative stress [14]. Although the exact dosing of the mitochondrial antioxidant drug required in vivo has yet to be established, it is clear that the antioxidant delivery requires a controlled release as opposed to a regular injectable dosage. Therefore, designing a robust and flexible drug delivery system is of paramount importance to maintain an optimal balance between subcellular ROS.

Electrospinning is a versatile nanofabrication technique in which solid fibers can be obtained from polymeric solutions. This technique has been successfully used as a controlled drug delivery system, being able to provide a suitable amount of a desired drug to the target area [25, 26, 27, 28]. The enclosed drug can be released from the nanofibrous scaffolds by desorption from the surface, diffusion into the surrounding media or by degradation of the nanofibrous scaffold. Control over the release of the drug can be obtained by manipulating the morphology of the nanofibers at the nanoscale level, namely, fiber diameter, density of nanopores, and alignment of the fibers, by choosing the proper polymer to electrospin, or by providing externally manipulatable resources in the fibers to be able to externally control the release [29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

In this study, we examined whether electrospinning method to upload JP4‐039 onto an FDA‐approved biocompatible polymer PLGA‐based nanofibrous scaffold will retain the antioxidant property of JP4‐039 when released from the scaffold over a period of time. As a first step, we have successfully encapsulated the mitochondria‐targeting antioxidant JP4‐039 into PLGA 85 : 15 electrospun fibers. We then evaluated the release pattern of the drug, JP4‐039, from the scaffold, the presence and activity of the radical scavenging moiety in the released drug using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). We also examined the effects of the released mitochondrial antioxidant activity JP4‐039 on tube formation in human coronary artery EC (HCAEC) in vitro.

Materials and methods

Polymers and reagents

Polylactide‐co‐glycolide acid (PLGA) Resomer LG 857 (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG Company, Ingelheim, Germany). 2,2,2‐Trifluoroethanol (TFE) > 99% (Sigma‐Aldrich Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). JP4‐039 has been provided by P. Wipf's laboratory in Pittsburgh University and was prepared as previously reported [33]. Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells (HCAEC) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). EGM‐2MV media (Lonza, Morristown, NJ, USA), DPBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Cultrex® basement membrane extract (BME; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). 16‐well chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Electrospinning

A lab‐built electrospinning device was used consisting of a high‐voltage power supply (Glassman Co, EH‐Series, High Bridge, NJ, USA), syringe pump (Braintree Scientific Co, BS‐8000, Braintree, MA, USA), and a flat aluminum plate covered with a thin aluminum foil. All the different parts were enclosed in an environmental‐controlled chamber capable of providing various relative humidity range (16% up to 90%). PLGA with a lactic acid : glycolic acid ratio of 85 : 15 was dissolved in trifluoroethanol (TFE) solvent in 2 wt% concentration to achieve a proper spinnable concentration. Various electrospinning parameters were utilized and adjusted to reach the optimized electrospinning conditions, by which continuous bead‐free fibers can be obtained. The solutions were placed inside of a 1‐mL glass syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA) connected to a flat tip 22‐gauge metal needle. The syringe was placed inside of the flow pump, 17 cm away from the stationary aluminum deposition collector, which was covered by a thin aluminum foil. The flow rate of the solution was set at 0.2 mL·h−1 and the applied voltage to the tip of the needle was 15 kV. The collector was completely grounded. The deposition time was monitored accurately to have samples with the exact thicknesses.

JP4‐039 was dissolved in a PLGA 85 : 15‐TFE solution in 2% concentration and the obtained solution was electrospun via a physical blending method and the fibers got deposited on the aluminum foil by monitoring the deposition time as well as the weight of the deposited scaffold, to reach to the proper thickness.

Scanning electron microscopy

The morphology of the electrospun samples was monitored using Hitachi SU5000 scanning electron microscopy (Hitachi, Clarksburg, MD, USA) at different accelerating voltages of 5–20 kV. Briefly the samples were placed on the double‐sided carbon tape, mounted on the Hitachi scanning electron microscopy stubs, and monitored. The average fiber diameters were measured using imagej software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was utilized to confirm the perseverance of the chemical structure of the polymers and the drug after being exposed to the electrostatic field during electrospinning procedure. The fibrous scaffold, with and without the loaded JP4‐039, was ground finely and mixed with IR‐grade potassium bromide (KBr) in ratio of 5 : 95. The ground mixture powder was then pressed into a pellet for spectral measurements, scanned for 500 times with the resolution of 2 cm−1 against blank KBr pellet as the reference. The FTIR spectra were obtained using Digilab Excalibur FTS3000MX and the Win‐IR Pro Program (Digilab, Hopkinton, MA, USA).

Evaluation of radical scavenging active moiety of the encapsulated JP4‐039

In order to evaluate the perseverance of the radical scavenging activity of JP4‐039 after being exposed to an electrostatic field via electrospinning, Bruker BioSpin's e‐scan electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to detect the triplet nitroxide peaks of the dissolved JP4‐039‐loaded scaffold in TFE. For this purpose, a 50 μL aliquot of the TFE solution in which the JP4‐039‐loaded scaffold was dissolved was placed inside of micropipettes. The micropipette was placed in the quartz EPR tube. The aliquot was scanned 100 times, under the following conditions; 3487 G center field, 0.54 G modulation amplitude, 38.5 mW microwave power, and 2.62 s sweep time. The triplet nitroxide radical peaks were obtained using winepr software and plotted using Microsoft Excel [34].

Calibration curve of JP4‐039

To be able to quantify the amount of the released JP4‐039 from the scaffolds, a calibration curve of the drug was obtained using EPR spectroscopy. Three different series of 11 known concentrations of JP4‐039 (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, and 20 μm) were prepared in TFE and analyzed using Bruker BioSpin's E‐scan EPR spectroscopy. Briefly, a 50‐μL aliquot of each solution was placed inside of a micropipette. The micropipette was placed in the quartz EPR tube. Each of the aliquots was scanned 100 times, under the following conditions; 3487 G center field, 0.54 G modulation amplitude, 38.5 mW microwave power, and 2.62 s sweep time. The triplet nitroxide radical peaks were obtained using winepr software. To get a quantitative measure of the drug, the area below the integral of the 1st derivative graph obtained by winepr software was measured using originpro software. Calibration curve of the drug was then plotted for drug concentration vs area below the peaks [35, 36].

Drug release assay

The drug‐loaded fibrous electrospun mats were removed from the foil and used for drug release assay. For this purpose, scaffolds with the same dimensions and thicknesses (0.25 square cm) were placed in 200 μL PBS (pH 7.2) kept at 37 °C. In different time intervals; 5 min until 72 h, the release medium was collected completely and replaced with fresh PBS. 50 μL aliquots of each of the collected media was analyzed using Bruker BioSpin's e‐scan EPR spectroscopy and winepr software to detect the nitroxide triplet peaks of the released drug. The triplet peaks were quantified to determine the concentration of the released drug using the obtained calibration curve [35, 36].

Measurement of mitochondrial ROS

Mito‐ROS were measured using MitoSOX Red assay as described in the manufacturer's protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In short, JP4‐039 was first dissolved in pure trifluoroethanol (TFE) and then diluted in PBS to a stock solution of 250 µm JP4‐039 in 1% TFE in PBS. The stock solution was then diluted to a final concentration of 5 µm JP4‐039 in EGM2‐MV media. Another solution containing the same amount of vehicle only (no JP4‐039) was diluted in EGM2‐MV media and used as control. HCAECs were incubated with or without 5 μm of JP4‐039 for 1 h and 30 min and subject to Mito‐ROS measurement assay. Data were obtained by measurement of fluorescence in a microplate reader.

Tube formation assay

In order to evaluate whether released JP4‐039 from the electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds was still capable of modulating HCAEC phenotype, in vitro tube formation assay as a function of EC migration and proliferation was performed. In brief, a stock solution containing the released JP4‐039 in PBS was diluted to a final concentration of 5 μm released JP4‐039 using EGM2‐MV media. The stock was obtained in two different experiments; first a 0.5 × 0.5 square centimeter scaffold was kept in 200 µL PBS for 24 h straight to be used as representative of the drug release which contained both initial burst release plus sustained release over a period of 24 h and named as ‘unwashed sample’. Secondly, a 0.5 × 0.5 square centimeter scaffold was placed in 200 µL PBS for 20 min; then, the medium containing the burst release drug was discarded, a fresh 200 µL PBS was added to the scaffold, and the medium containing released drug was collected after 24 h (prewashed sample). In parallel, PBS‐containing released vehicle from scaffolds without JP4‐039 was equally dissolved in the aforementioned media and used as control for both types of ‘pre‐washed’ and ‘unwashed’ samples. HCAECs were plated into a 16‐well chamber slide precoated with Cultrex® basement membrane extract at a density of 1.7 × 104 cells/well (passage 4). Cells were diluted with the EGM2‐MV media containing 5 μm released JP4‐039 for test wells or released vehicle for control wells prior to plating (total of 8 wells per group). Cells were kept in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37 °C and imaged after 3 h using 4× magnification phase contrast in an inverted microscope (Eclipse Ts2; Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). Number of tubes was measured using imagej software.

Scratch assay

HCAEC were plated in a 48‐well plate at a density of 3.2 × 104 cells/well (passage 5) and allowed to grow in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37 °C until full confluency (48 h). Prior to starting the assay, 70 µm stock solutions released from scaffolds in PBS were diluted with EGM2‐MV media to a final concentration of 5 µm released JP4‐039 or an equal volume of released vehicle in 37 °C EGM2‐MV media. Then, a yellow (200 µL) tip was used to make a transversal scratch in the middle of each well. Cell debris was promptly washed with warm EGM2‐MV media and replaced by warm EGM2‐MV media containing either released vehicle or released JP4‐039 from scaffolds (total of 8 wells per group). Cells were kept in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37 °C and imaged after 3 and 6 h using 4× magnification phase contrast in an inverted microscope (Eclipse Ts2; Nikon Instruments Inc.). The scratch area was measured in pixels using imagej software and expressed as the percent decrease in the scratch area relative to the total area [37].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using two‐tailed Student's t‐test considering a P‐value inferior to 0.05 as significant. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Figures and graphs were prepared using Microsoft excel (Figs 2, 3, 4, 5) and graphpad prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) (Figs 1 and 6).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Uploading of mitochondrial antioxidant JP4‐039 onto PLGA polymer by electrospinning. Scanning electron microscopy pictures of (A) blank PLGA 85 : 15 scaffold, (B) JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 scaffold showing continuous bead‐free morphology of the fabricated fibers. Diameter distribution of (C) blank PLGA 85 : 15 and (D) JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 scaffolds demonstrating the uniform fibers with a normal diameter distribution, and reduction in the average fiber diameter by enclosure of the drug from 408.19 ± 3.71 nm to 272.67 ± 2.45 nm. Scale bar represents 10 µm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Fourier transform infrared spectra (FITR) of blank PLGA 85 : 15, JP4‐039 powder, and JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 scaffold. Infrared spectra (A) from 1350 to 1950 cm−1, and (B) from 2500 to 3500 cm−1, demonstrating perseverance of the chemical structure of the drug postexposure to high electrostatic field during the fabrication technique by showing peaks at 3000, 2800, 1680, and 1650 cm−1 and at 1400–1500 cm−1, which correspond to C–H stretching in alkenes, C–H stretching at alkanes, C = O stretching and N–H bonds, N–O of the nitro compound of the drug, respectively, which are all observed in the JP4‐039 spectra and JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA85 : 15 fibers as well.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and calibration curve of JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA85 : 15 nanofibrous scaffolds. (A) EPR spectra of JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 scaffold dissolved in TFE showing nitroxide triplet peaks demonstrating the perseverance of active moiety of the drug after exposure to high electrostatic field in the fabrication technique. (B) Calibration curve of JP4‐039 using EPR spectroscopy to quantify the amount of the release drug from the scaffold by demonstrating a linear trendline correlating EPR spectra to the JP4‐30 concentration and the equation best describing it.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Release pattern of JP4‐039 from the nanofibrous scaffold. Percentage of cumulative release of JP4‐039 from drug‐loaded scaffold (A) up to 3 h (B) and up to 72 h showing an initial burst release of 22.5 ± 0.57% in initial 30 min following a more sustained release of 24.63 ± 0.77% in 3 h and 30.89 ± 0.27% in 72 h.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

JP4‐039 reduces mitochondrial ROS in human coronary artery EC (HCAEC). HCAEC treated with 5 μm JP4‐039 significantly reduces mitochondrial ROS compared to vehicle control as measured by mitoSox assay. HCAECs were used between passages three to six. Data were analyzed using two‐tailed Student's t‐test considering a P‐value inferior to 0.05 as significant. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. n = 4/group; *P < 0.05.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

JP4‐039 released from scaffold increases tube formation in HCAEC. Representative images and graphical results show (A) the number of complete loops formed by HCAEC 3 h after incubation with JP4‐039 that was released from the nanofibrous scaffolds over a period of 24 h (unwashed sample), and (B) HCAEC 3 h after incubation with JP4‐039 that was released from a prewashed (for 20 min to get rid of the initial burst release containing high‐concentration JP4‐039) nanofibrous scaffold (prewashed sample). Two‐tailed Students' t‐test was carried out to determine statistical significance. n = 8; P = 0.001; results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Scale bar represents 100 µm.

Results

JP4‐039 reduces mitochondrial ROS in HCAEC

In order to confirm mitochondrial specificity of the antioxidant activity of JP4‐039, HCAECs were incubated with or without 5 μm of JP4‐039 for 30 min and subject to a mitochondrial ROS measurement assay using the MitoSOX Red reagent as described in the manufacturer's protocol (ThermoFisher Scientific). JP4‐039 reduced mitochondrial ROS levels by 45 ± 14% compared to vehicle control (Fig. 1).

Morphological characterization of electrospun scaffolds

We then analyzed the morphology and the diameter distribution of the electrospun polymeric fibers with and without enclosed JP4‐039 (Fig. 2A–D and Table 1). Scanning electron microscopy pictures of the electrospun polymeric fibers demonstrated that, upon optimizing the process and solution parameters, continuous bead‐free fibers were obtained from the polymeric solutions with or without enclosed JP4‐039. Table 1 shows the electrospinning conditions as well as the average fiber diameter of each scaffold obtained using imagej software. PLGA 85 : 15 polymer (with 85% PLA and 15% PGA) was spun into continuous bead‐free fibers at 2% wt concentration using a flow rate of 0.2 mL·h−1, a voltage of 15 kV and with a capillary to collector distance of 17 cm (Table 1). The fiber diameter of PLGA 85 : 15 without the enlaced drug showed a positive skewed distribution with an average value of 408.19 ± 3.71 nm (Figs 2A,C). When 2% JP4‐039 was incorporated in the solution, the fiber diameter reduced to 272.67 ± 2.45 nm and the distribution became normal comparing to blank PLGA 85 : 15 fibers (Fig. 2B,D). The average diameter of the fibers decreased after loading of the drug, which can be due to changes in the properties of the electrospinning solution, such as the conductivity.

Table 1.

Summary of electrospinning parameters used for fabrication of PLGA 85 : 15 scaffolds with and without JP4‐039.

Polymer–drug Concentration (wt/wt) Flow rate (mL·h−1) Distance (cm) Voltage (kV) Average diameter (nm)
PLGA 85 : 15 2% 0.2 17 15 408.1959 ± 3.71
PLGA 85 : 15/JP4‐039

2% Polymer

2% Drug

0.2 17 15 272.6631 ± 2.4573

Chemical characterization of the electrospun scaffolds

The FTIR spectra of the polymer PLGA, the drug JP4‐039, and the drug‐loaded polymeric scaffolds demonstrated preservation of the chemical structure of the drug and the polymer after electrospinning process (Fig. 3). In the JP4‐039 spectra, the peaks at 3300 cm−1 correspond to the N–H stretching for secondary amines, which can also be seen in the JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA85 : 15 fibers (Fig. 3B). The peaks around 3000 cm−1 correspond to C–H stretching in alkenes and the ones at 2800 cm−1 for alkanes, the ones at 1680 cm−1 and 1650 cm−1 correspond to C=O stretching and N–H bonds, respectively, and the peaks at 1400–1500 cm−1 correspond to the N–O of the nitro compound of the drug which are all observed in the JP4‐039 spectra and JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 fibers as well (Fig. 3A). For PLGA 85 : 15 fibers with and without the drug, the peaks at 2800–3000 cm−1 are related to the C–H stretching of the aliphatic part and OH of the carboxylic part of the polymer (Fig. 3B), and the peaks at 1700–1800 cm−1 correspond to C=O in carboxylic acid, and the peaks at 1450 cm−1 are for CH bending of methyl groups in the structure (Fig. 3A). Therefore, the FTIR spectra confirmed preservation of the chemical structure of JP4‐039 and PLGA 85 : 15 in the JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 fibers postexposure to the electrostatic field during electrospinning method.

Preservation of active moiety of the drug

The EPR spectra of JP4‐039‐loaded scaffold, dissolved in TFE were examined for the presence of nitroxide radicals in the electrospun scaffolds (Fig. 4A). The triplet peaks of the nitroxide radicals of JP4‐039 from the electrospun scaffold showed the presence of the radical scavenging active moiety in the fabricated patches (Fig. 4A). These peaks were identical to the original drug prior to loading onto the electrospun scaffolds, suggesting that the functional moiety of the drug was preserved in the PLGA nanofibrous scaffolds.

Drug release from the electrospun scaffolds

The calibration curve of JP4‐039 was determined using EPR spectroscopy (Fig. 4B). A linear trendline could be plotted for the data and the equation correlating EPR spectra to JP4‐039 concentration was obtained while having R 2 value of 0.97. Using the equation derived from the calibration curve, the release of JP4‐039 from the PLGA 85 : 15 electrospun scaffold was analyzed for up to 72 h. Figure 5A,B shows the release pattern of JP4‐039 from the polymeric scaffolds up to 3 and 72 h, respectively. It was observed that released JP4‐039 had an initial burst release in the first 30 min following a more sustained release in the later hours. 22.5 ± 0.57% of the drug was released in the first 30 min; then till 3 h, it was at 24.63 ± 0.77%. Following this initial 3.5 h, the drug release increased very slowly over time. After 72 h, the cumulative drug release was 30.89 ± 0.27%. Together, these data suggest that JP4‐039 had an initial burst release from the PLGA 85 : 15 fibrous scaffold, followed by a sustained release over prolonged period of time.

JP4‐039 released from the nanofibrous scaffold improved tube formation and wound healing in HCAEC in vitro

In vitro tube formation assay is a measure for EC proliferation and migration. When incubated in the presence of 5 μm JP4‐039 that was released from the scaffolds for over 24 h (‘unwashed sample’), HCAEC demonstrated 18 ± 3% increase in tube formation as compared to the vehicle‐treated HCAEC (released vehicle) (Fig. 6A). Control wells containing released vehicle had an average of 82 ± 1.62 tubes versus 96 ± 2.16 tubes in the wells treated with released JP4‐039 (Fig. 6A). In parallel experiments, another set of JP4‐039‐loaded scaffolds were subject to drug release where JP4‐039 that was released during initial burst release for 20 mins was discarded and the scaffolds were briefly washed, followed by collection of released JP4‐039 for over next 24 h (from > 20 min to 24 h) (‘prewashed samples’). In the presence of 5 µm JP4‐039 from prewashed samples (that lacks the initial burst release), HCAEC demonstrated 25.8% increase in tube formation (Fig 6B). Control wells containing released vehicle had an average of 66 ± 2.0 tubes versus 83 ± 2.4 tubes in the well treated with released JP4‐039 (Fig 6B). These findings suggest that JP4‐039 released from the nanofibrous scaffolds during the initial burst release as well as JP4‐039 released over a prolonged period of time can improve tube formation (i.e., proliferation and migration) in HCAEC significantly. In order to measure migration of EC, a wound healing, also known as scratch assay, was performed using HCAEC treated with 5 μm released JP4‐039 or released vehicle as control (Fig. S1). Released JP4‐039 improved healing (closure of the gap of the ‘scratch’) by 48 ± 8% and 22 ± 5%, after 3 and 6 h of induction of the scratch, respectively, as compared to cells treated with the released vehicle from the scaffold. Taken together, the findings suggest that the released JP4‐039 could enhance proliferation and migration in HCAEC.

Discussion

In the current study, we have demonstrated that FDA‐approved biocompatible polymer PLGA 85 : 15 can be successfully used to fabricate a nanofibrous scaffold containing mitochondrial antioxidant JP4‐039 using electrospinning technique. The drug‐loaded scaffolds had continuous and bead‐free morphology. The chemical structure and functionality of the encapsulated JP4‐039 were conserved during the electrospinning procedure as shown by the FTIR analysis. The active moiety of the encapsulated drug, a nitroxide radical, was conserved in the structure of the released drug from the scaffold as shown by the EPR spectroscopy. Together, these findings suggest that the released drug, JP4‐039, from the scaffold possesses mitochondrial radical scavenging properties. The released drug also improved tube formation and wound healing in HCAEC in vitro suggesting that the reduction in mitochondrial ROS by JP4‐039 released from scaffolds induced EC proliferation and migration.

Electrospinning provides flexibility of delivery for drugs. In the current study, JP4‐039 could achieve up to 20.94 ± 1.49% release in the medium during the first few minutes (~ 20 min for our study) and then increased up to 30.89 ± 0.27% (cumulative) until 72 h followed by a more sustained release for a longer period of time. The burst release in the initial minutes is due to the diffusion of the drug into the surrounding media and the gradual 10% release in 72 h following a more sustained release is due to the degradation of the polymeric scaffold as the main mechanism of release. Therefore, the 70% remainder of the drug would get released from the scaffold over a longer period of time based on the degradation behavior of the polymeric scaffold. It has been reported that PLGA 85 : 15 degrades gradually within 30 weeks. Therefore, JP4‐039‐loaded scaffold would likely be able to provide an initial burst release followed by a sustained release of JP4‐039 for a prolonged period of time.

Electrospinning is a tunable process. The fiber diameter obtained for the current study with loaded JP4‐039 is the result of optimizing various parameters. According to the literature, changes in the electrospinning parameters lead to an alteration in the final fiber morphology. An increase in the flow rate of the solution results in the formation of fibers with larger diameters because, with the same applied voltage, the fiber jet gets stretched less thereby resulting in thicker fibers. In the same way, decreasing the applied voltage when flow rate is kept constant forms larger fibers, since fibers are getting less stretched, and therefore less thinning happens during their flow to the grounded collector. It is expected to get reduced release of the drug from fibers with larger diameters and the same porosity, due to a decrease in the final fiber surface area, although often a combination of morphological changes in the fibers such as diameter and degree of porosity of the fiber would determine the final release pattern [38, 39, 40, 41]. Therefore, it is possible to load desired concentration of the drug and achieve an optimal release pattern by modulating electrospinning and morphological parameters, without requiring to change the total quantity of the polymer used and/or dimension of the scaffold. For instance, as long as the concentration of the drug is below the saturation point in the solution, the initial drug to polymer ratio can be tailored in order to encapsulate a larger amount of the drug inside the fibers and consequently obtain a higher concentration in the released medium. For the applications requiring a drug to be delivered to the tissue promptly, utilization of a polymer with appropriate hydrophilic properties can be used to obtain a faster release behavior [42]. On the contrary, a polymer with a more hydrophobic nature can be used for providing a more sustained release. In summary, electrospinning is a system which is capable of being tuned to provide the required release/delivery pattern of a drug. This is the most exciting advantage of using electrospun polymeric scaffolds as implant‐based drug delivery system.

In previous work by others, JP4‐039 has been enclosed into microneedle assays (MNAs) and used as a radiomitigator for topical delivery in mice exposed to body irradiation, and compared to normal IV injections [43]. In the injection method, JP4‐039's concentration in blood increased and then rapidly decreased after 5 min and was stabilized after 10 min. In contrast, MNAs provided a slow increase in the blood concentration for the first 5 min and then stayed at the same level as IV injection [43]. JP4‐039 has also been injected in mice at 1 mg·kg−1 dosage and incubated with 32D cl 3 murine hematopoietic progenitor cells at 1 μm prior to exposure to irradiation, respectively, and showed a significant increase in the survival rate [44]. In another study, the effect of JP4‐039 has been evaluated in a radiation‐induced skin damage model by applying 50 μL of JP4‐039 with or without the lipid carrier at 30 min, 24 h, and 48 h after irradiation [23]. In the present study, biocompatible, biodegradable JP4‐039‐loaded nanofibrous patches offer the advantage of a high concentration of the drug within the first 3 h followed by a sustained release over the next 72 h. These biocompatible nanofibrous scaffolds capable of releasing an uploaded drug over a prolonged period of time would replace the need for reapplication or multiple injections of the drug. Future in vivo studies will be required to examine whether the implanted nanofibrous patches will deliver JP4‐039 to the impacted area in a sustained and controlled release pattern. Removal of a patch will not be required since FDA‐approved biodegradable polymers (PLGA) have been used for fabrication of the scaffold as the drug reservoir and delivery. Furthermore, as mentioned earlier electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds are tunable, that is, the fibrous structure can easily be manipulated and the required release behavior can be altered depending on the desired treatment [42, 45, 46, 47]. At a functional level, JP4‐039 released from the nanofibrous scaffolds over a period of 24 h improved tube formation (a function of migration and proliferation) (Fig. 6A) and ‘wound healing’ (a measure of migration) in HCAEC (Fig. S1), suggesting the applicability of the fabricated patches in reducing oxidative stress and improving functionality in HCAEC. Our data also confirmed a query whether exclusion of the initial 20 min burst release from 24 h ‘prewashed samples’ of released JP4‐039 would still be functionally active (Fig. 6B). As we learn more about the molecular mechanisms of the complex nature of mitochondrial ROS in modulating EC metabolism and thus recovery in myocardial ischemia, we will need to devise a more precise and temporal modulation of antioxidant release in in vivo setting in future studies. Electrospinning provides this flexibility either through polymer–drug process parameter combination [29, 45, 48, 49, 50], or through controlled release using external actuation. [25, 31, 51]. Needless to mention, PLGA being FDA‐approved and biocompatible, has already marked safe to be used in in vivo assays and clinical settings for many applications which eliminate the concern of toxicity for our JP4‐039‐loaded scaffold [52, 53]. In a study where linezolid‐loaded PLGA scaffold was implanted in rats with bone and soft tissue infection, no sign of toxicity was observed [54]. The PLGA used in that study was a 1 × 1 square centimeter scaffold weighing 12 mg, which is much larger than the scaffolds used in our current study, and showed no signs of toxicity. For our future in vivo studies, based on the concentration requirement of JP4‐039, about 1–3 μg of the drug and 30 μg of polymer scaffold will be needed to obtain a sustained release in mouse models. Thus, we do not anticipate any toxicity to be observed in our in vivo models. Additionally, PLGA and PLGA‐based fibrous scaffolds, due to their biocompatibility, have also been used in other studies for in vivo evaluations [55].

In conclusion, the JP4‐039‐loaded continuous fibrous patches, made from electrospun FDA‐approved biodegradable polymers, are capable of preserving the mitochondrial‐targeting antioxidant activity of the drug and can act as a source to deliver the drug over a prolonged period of time. We reported earlier that reduction in mitochondrial ROS improved EC proliferation in vitro and aortic angiogenic sprouting ex vivo in a transgenic animal model with oxidative stress in vascular endothelium [14]. In the current study, an enhancement in EC proliferation and migration as shown by increased tube formation and wound healing in vitro by the mitochondria‐specific antioxidant drug JP4‐039 released from the nanofibrous scaffolds also supported a positive role for reduction in mitochondrial ROS in HCAEC. Therefore, the JP4‐039‐loaded PLGA 85 : 15 fibrous scaffolds appear to be good candidates for conditions that require prolonged reduction in mitochondrial ROS. In future studies, the activity and efficacy of the drug‐encapsulated biodegradable implants will be evaluated in vivo using animal models of oxidative stress and ischemia.

Conflict of interest

PW is a named inventor on patents held by the University of Pittsburgh covering JP4‐039 composition and use.

Author contributions

YH performed experiments, acquired and analyzed data, and wrote the paper; RBT performed experiments, analyzed data, and cowrote the paper; CK performed data analysis and graphical abstract and edited part of the paper; PW supplied JP4‐039, helped troubleshoot, and edited paper; SB helped with experiments, performed data analysis, and edited the paper; MRA conceptualized the study, supervised experiments, interpreted data, edited, finalized, and submitted the paper.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. JP4‐039 released from scaffold increases wound healing in HCAEC. Representative images and graphical results show the increase in area difference (decrease in wound area) at zero (left panel), three (middle) and six hours (right) after the scratch. Upper panels show HCAEC incubated with Vehicle released from the unloaded scaffolds, and lower panels show HCAEC incubated with JP4‐039 released from the drug‐loaded scaffolds over a period of 24 hours. Bar graphs show statistical analysis of ‘wound healing’ (scratch closure) or gap closure at 3 hours (left) and 6 hours (right) after the induction of the assays. Two‐tailed Students' t‐test was carried out to determine statistical significance. n=8; p=0.0014 (0‐3 hrs), p=0.0076 (0‐6 hrs). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Scale bar represents 100µm.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NHLBI/NIGMS grant 1R01HL133624‐01A1 to MRA. The electron microscopy images in this work were obtained at UMASS Dartmouth using a scanning electron microscope supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1726239. We would like to acknowledge Distinguished Doctoral Fellowship grant provided by office of graduate studies of University of Massachusetts Dartmouth as well as SEED funding provided by University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Graphical abstract created with BioRender.com.

Data accessibility

Data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Muntean DM, Sturza A, Dănilă MD, Borza C, Duicu OM and Mornoș C (2016) The role of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular injury and protective strategies. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Abid MR, Schoots IG, Spokes KC, Wu S‐Q, Mawhinney C and Aird WC (2004) Vascular endothelial growth factor‐mediated induction of manganese superoxide dismutase occurs through redox‐dependent regulation of forkhead and IkappaB/NF‐kappaB. J Biol Chem 279, 44030–44038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Abid MR, Spokes KC, Shih S‐C and Aird WC (2007) NADPH oxidase activity selectively modulates vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 282, 35373–35385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Feng J, Damrauer SM, Lee M, Sellke FW, Ferran C and Abid MR (2010) Endothelium‐dependent coronary vasodilatation requires NADPH oxidase‐derived reactive oxygen species. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30, 1703–1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shafique E, Choy WC, Liu Y, Feng J, Cordeiro B, Lyra A, Arafah M, Yassin‐Kassab A, Zanetti AVD, Clements RT et al (2013) Oxidative stress improves coronary endothelial function through activation of the pro‐survival kinase AMPK. Aging 5, 515–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ozcan A and Öğün M (2015) Biochemistry of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species, pp. 37–58. London: InTech. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kim Y‐M, Kim S‐J, Tatsunami R, Yamamura H, Fukai T and Ushio‐Fukai M (2017) ROS‐induced ROS release orchestrated by Nox4, Nox2, and mitochondria in VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 312, C749–C764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen F, Haigh S, Barman S and Fulton DJR (2012) From form to function: the role of Nox4 in the cardiovascular system. Front Physiol 3, 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bendall JK, Rinze R, Adlam D, Tatham AL, de Bono J, Wilson N, Volpi E and Channon KM (2007) Endothelial Nox2 overexpression potentiates vascular oxidative stress and hemodynamic response to angiotensin II: studies in endothelial‐targeted Nox2 transgenic mice. Circ Res 100, 1016–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen L, Xiao J, Kuroda J, Ago T, Sadoshima J, Cohen RA and Tong X (2014) Both hydrogen peroxide and transforming growth factor beta 1 contribute to endothelial Nox4 mediated angiogenesis in endothelial Nox4 transgenic mouse lines. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842, 2489–2499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ray R, Murdoch CE, Wang M, Santos CX, Zhang M, Alom‐Ruiz S, Anilkumar N, Ouattara A, Cave AC, Walker SJ et al (2011) Endothelial Nox4 NADPH oxidase enhances vasodilatation and reduces blood pressure in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31, 1368–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Datla SR, Peshavariya H, Dusting GJ, Mahadev K, Goldstein BJ and Jiang F (2007) Important role of Nox4 type NADPH oxidase in angiogenic responses in human microvascular endothelial cells in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27, 2319–2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D and Gluud C (2014) Antioxidant supplements and mortality. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17, 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shafique E, Torina A, Reichert K, Colantuono B, Nur N, Zeeshan K, Ravichandran V, Liu Y, Feng J, Zeeshan K et al (2017) Mitochondrial redox plays a critical role in the paradoxical effects of NAPDH oxidase‐derived ROS on coronary endothelium. Cardiovasc Res 113, 234–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schoors S, Bruning U, Missiaen R, Queiroz KCS, Borgers G, Elia I, Zecchin A, Cantelmo AR, Christen S, Goveia J et al (2015) Fatty acid carbon is essential for dNTP synthesis in endothelial cells. Nature 520, 192–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Armstrong JS (2007) Mitochondria‐directed therapeutics. Antioxid Redox Signal 10, 575–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Morin D, Hauet T, Spedding M and Tillement J‐P (2001) Mitochondria as target for antiischemic drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 49, 151–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sluijter JPG, Condorelli G, Davidson SM, Engel FB, Ferdinandy P, Hausenloy DJ, Lecour S, Madonna R, Ovize M, Ruiz‐Meana M et al (2014) Novel therapeutic strategies for cardioprotection. Pharmacol Ther 144, 60–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Smith RAJ, Hartley RC, Cochemé HM and Murphy MP (2012) Mitochondrial pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33, 341–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Escobales N, Nuñez RE, Jang S, Parodi‐Rullan R, Ayala‐Peña S, Sacher JR, Skoda EM, Wipf P, Frontera W and Javadov S (2014) Mitochondria‐targeted ROS scavenger improves post‐ischemic recovery of cardiac function and attenuates mitochondrial abnormalities in aged rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol 77, 136–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wipf P, Xiao J, Jiang J, Belikova NA, Tyurin VA, Fink MP and Kagan VE (2005) Mitochondrial targeting of selective electron scavengers: synthesis and biological analysis of hemigramicidin−TEMPO conjugates. J Am Chem Soc 127, 12460–12461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rajagopalan MS, Gupta K, Epperly MW, Franicola D, Zhang X, Wang H, Kagan VE, Wipf P, Kanai A and Greenberger JS (2009) Potentially lethal damage repair is enhanced by the mitochondria‐targeted nitroxide JP4‐039. Int J Radiat Oncol 75, S550–S551. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Brand RM, Epperly MW, Stottlemyer JM, Skoda EM, Gao X, Li S, Huq S, Wipf P, Kagan VE, Greenberger JS et al (2017) A topical mitochondria‐targeted redox‐cycling nitroxide mitigates oxidative stress‐induced skin damage. J Invest Dermatol 137, 576–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Goff JP, Shields DS, Wang H, Skoda EM, Sprachman MM, Wipf P, Garapati VK, Atkinson J, London B, Lazo JS et al (2013) Evaluation of potential ionizing irradiation protectors and mitigators using clonogenic survival of human umbilical cord blood hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol 41, 957–966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jassal M, Sengupta S and Bhowmick S (2015) Functionalization of electrospun poly(caprolactone) fibers for pH‐controlled delivery of doxorubicin hydrochloride. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 26, 1425–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chen S, Li R, Li X and Xie J (2018) Electrospinning: an enabling nanotechnology platform for drug delivery and regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 132, 188–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hu X, Liu S, Zhou G, Huang Y, Xie Z and Jing X (2014) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for drug delivery applications. J Control Release 185, 12–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hamedani Y, Fazeli N and Barzin J (2017) Production and characterization of gelatine based electro‐spun nanofibers as burn wound dressings. Iranian J of Chemical Eng 14, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Perez RA and Kim H‐W (2015) Core–shell designed scaffolds for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 21, 2–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Han C, Cai N, Chan V, Liu M, Feng X and Yu F (2018) Enhanced drug delivery, mechanical properties and antimicrobial activities in poly(lactic acid) nanofiber with mesoporous Fe3O4‐COOH nanoparticles. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 559, 104–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kim Y‐J, Ebara M and Aoyagi T (2013) A smart hyperthermia nanofiber with switchable drug release for inducing cancer apoptosis. Adv Funct Mater 23, 5753–5761. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ji W, Yang F, van den Beucken JJJP, Bian Z, Fan M, Chen Z and Jansen JA (2010) Fibrous scaffolds loaded with protein prepared by blend or coaxial electrospinning. Acta Biomater 6, 4199–4207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang J and Windbergs M (2018) Controlled dual drug release by coaxial electrospun fibers – impact of the core fluid on drug encapsulation and release. Int J Pharm 556, 363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Frantz M‐C, Pierce JG, Pierce JM, Kangying L, Qingwei W, Johnson M and Wipf P (2011) Large‐scale asymmetric synthesis of the bioprotective agent JP4‐039 and analogs. Org Lett 13, 2318–2321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Davies MJ (2016) Detection and characterisation of radicals using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin trapping and related methods. Methods 109, 21–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Barr DP and Weber RT (2010) Quantitative EPR. Springer‐Verlag, Wien. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cormier N, Yeo A, Fiorentino E and Paxson J (2015) Optimization of the wound scratch assay to detect changes in murine mesenchymal stromal cell migration after damage by soluble cigarette smoke extract. J Vis Exp 106, e53414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Thakkar S and Misra M (2017) Electrospun polymeric nanofibers: new horizons in drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 107, 148–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Goonoo N, Bhaw‐Luximon A and Jhurry D (2015) Drug loading and release from electrospun biodegradable nanofibers. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10, 2173–2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lee J, Yoo JJ, Atala A and Lee SJ (2012) The effect of controlled release of PDGF‐BB from heparin‐conjugated electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds on cellular bioactivity and infiltration. Biomaterials 33, 6709–6720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cui W, Li X, Zhu X, Yu G, Zhou S and Weng J (2006) Investigation of drug release and matrix degradation of electrospun poly(dl‐lactide) fibers with paracetamol inoculation. Biomacromol 7, 1623–1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Yu D‐G, Shen X‐X, Branford‐White C, White K, Zhu L‐M, Annie B and Annie Bligh SW (2009) Oral fast‐dissolving drug delivery membranes prepared from electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone ultrafine fibers. Nanotechnology 20, 55104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Brand R, Erdos G, Epperly M, Dixon T, Franicola D, Falo LD Jr, Wipf P and Greenberger JS (2015) Effective topical delivery of radiomitigator GS‐nitroxide (JP4‐039) by microneedle arrays. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93, E541–E542. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Epperly MW, Pierce JG, Dixon T, Franicola D, Wipf P and Greenberger JS (2008) The mitochondrial targeted GS‐nitroxide JP4‐039 is radioprotective in vitro and in vivo. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72, S82. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chou S‐F, Carson D and Woodrow KA (2015) Current strategies for sustaining drug release from electrospun nanofibers. J Controlled Release 220, 584–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Liao I‐C, Chen S, Liu JB and Leong KW (2009) Sustained viral gene delivery through core‐shell fibers. J Controlled Release 139, 48–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nam S, Lee J‐J, Lee SY, Jeong J, Kang W‐S and Cho H‐J (2017) Angelica gigas Nakai extract‐loaded fast‐dissolving nanofiber based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and Soluplus for oral cancer therapy. Int J Pharm 526, 225–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Illangakoon UE, Gill H, Shearman GC, Parhizkar M, Mahalingam S, Chatterton NP and Williams GR (2014) Fast dissolving paracetamol/caffeine nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. Int J Pharm 477, 369–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Celebioglu A and Uyar T (2019) Metronidazole/hydroxypropyl‐β‐cyclodextrin inclusion complex nanofibrous webs as fast‐dissolving oral drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 572, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Su Y, Su Q, Liu W, Lim M, Venugopal JR, Mo X, Ramakrishna S, Al‐Deyab SS and El‐Newehy M (2012) Controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 and dexamethasone loaded in core–shell PLLACL–collagen fibers for use in bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8, 763–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Li H, Liu K, Williams GR, Wu J, Wu J, Wang H, Niu S and Zhu L‐M (2018) Dual temperature and pH responsive nanofiber formulations prepared by electrospinning. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 171, 142–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Virlan MJR, Mirisescu D, Totan A, Greabu M, Tanase C, Sabliov CM, Caruntu C and Calenic B (2015) Current uses of poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid) in the dental field: a comprehensive review. J Chem 2015, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Schneider D, Weber FE, Grunder U, Andreoni C, Burkhardt R and Jung RE (2014) A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide‐coglycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 25, 150–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Boncu TE, Guclu AU, Catma MF, Savaser A, Gokce A and Ozdemir N (2020) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of linezolid loaded electrospun PLGA and PLGA/PCL fiber mats for prophylaxis and treatment of MRSA induced prosthetic infections. Int J Pharm 573, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Garcia‐Orue I, Gainza G, Garcia‐Garcia P, Gutierrez FB, Aguirre JJ, Hernandez RM, Delgado A and Igartua M (2019) Composite nanofibrous membranes of PLGA/Aloe vera containing lipid nanoparticles for wound dressing applications. Int J Pharm 556, 320–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. JP4‐039 released from scaffold increases wound healing in HCAEC. Representative images and graphical results show the increase in area difference (decrease in wound area) at zero (left panel), three (middle) and six hours (right) after the scratch. Upper panels show HCAEC incubated with Vehicle released from the unloaded scaffolds, and lower panels show HCAEC incubated with JP4‐039 released from the drug‐loaded scaffolds over a period of 24 hours. Bar graphs show statistical analysis of ‘wound healing’ (scratch closure) or gap closure at 3 hours (left) and 6 hours (right) after the induction of the assays. Two‐tailed Students' t‐test was carried out to determine statistical significance. n=8; p=0.0014 (0‐3 hrs), p=0.0076 (0‐6 hrs). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Scale bar represents 100µm.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from FEBS Open Bio are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES