Skip to main content
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry logoLink to Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
. 2020 Sep 1;69(1):25–34. doi: 10.1369/0022155420954296

Hyaluronan and Its Receptors as Regulatory Molecules of the Endothelial Interface

Kimberly A Queisser 1,*, Rebecca A Mellema 2,*, Aaron C Petrey 3,4,
Editors: Liliana Schaefer, Charles W Frevert
PMCID: PMC7780188  PMID: 32870756

Abstract

On the surface of endothelial cells (ECs) lies the glycocalyx, a barrier of polysaccharides that isolates the ECs from the blood. The role of the glycocalyx is dynamic and complex, thanks to not only its structure, but its vast number of components, one being hyaluronan (HA). HA is a critical component of the glycocalyx, having been found to have a wide variety of functions depending on its molecular weight, its modification, and receptor–ligand interactions. As HA and viscous blood are in constant contact, HA can transmit mechanosensory information directly to the cytoskeleton of the ECs. The degradation and synthesis of HA directly alters the permeability of the EC barrier; HA modulation not only alters the physical barrier but also can signal the initiation of other pathways. EC proliferation and angiogenesis are in part regulated by HA fragmentation, HA-dependent receptor binding, and downstream signals. The interaction between the CD44 receptor and HA is a driving force behind leukocyte recruitment, but each class of leukocyte still interacts with HA in unique ways during inflammation. HA regulates a diverse repertoire of EC functions.

Keywords: angiogenesis, extracellular matrix, glycocalyx, glycosaminoglycan, immune cell recruitment, proteoglycan

Introduction

The endothelium is covered in a dynamic, polysaccharide rich layer which lines the apical surface of endothelial cells (ECs) and extends into the lumen of vessels. The EC surface layer is a unique form of extracellular matrix (ECM) distinct in composition and function from the matrix found in other tissues.1 This ECM is often referred to as the glycocalyx and lies juxtaposed between blood and the endothelial surface. The first ultrastructural visualization of the glycocalyx used the cationic-dye ruthenium red, which binds to acidic and charged polysaccharides producing electron density in the presence of osmium tetroxide.2 Experimental evidence demonstrates that proteoglycans (PGs), glycoproteins, glycolipids, and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) together comprise the glycocalyx, and serve as the functional interface between serum, blood cells, and the endothelium.3,4 New imaging techniques combined with fluorescent probes have been used to specifically label major components of the glycocalyx.5,6 These approaches have been combined with enzymatic degradation of the glycocalyx to determine the relative thickness within the lumen vessels, revealing a much thicker glycan layer in large vessels ranging from 2.2 µm to 11 µm and ranging from 0.1 µm to 3.02 µm in microvessels.3,710 Due to its location, the glycocalyx plays important roles in homeostatic vascular function which when disrupted contribute to disease, such as in atherosclerosis.11,12 In particular, diabetes and dysregulated glucose metabolism is characterized by significant alterations of the glycocalyx and its components.1317 These roles are determined by composition, structure, and relative abundance. Components of the glycocalyx regulate many important physiological processes including outside-in signaling, immune cell recruitment, angiogenesis, and coagulation, together playing a key role in vascular integrity.6,1822

While the specific thickness of the glycocalyx may be dependent on the type of vessel, the major GAG constituents include heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, and hyaluronan (HA).6 Whether the relative abundance of each GAG varies by vessel or tissue requires further study. HA is distinguished from the other GAGs as it is the only non-sulfated GAG in the glycocalyx, and it is not covalently attached to proteins, but rather bound and tethered to the cell surface by HA-binding proteins.23 While other GAGs are synthesized in Golgi compartments as a post-translational modification of a PG core protein, HA synthases embedded in the EC plasma membrane assemble HA at the cell surface and extruded the growing HA polymer directly into the extracellular space. At the cell surface, HA can achieve an extremely high degree of polymerization, reaching a molecular weight >1 mDa. HA is presumed to intertwine through elements of the glycocalyx, and can function as a scaffold capable of forming microdomains for binding and clustering of appropriate receptors.24 At the EC surface, HA is observed as a network covering the luminal surface, intercalated between various PGs forming a “gel-like” layer which acts as a molecular sieve of the luminal capillary.25 Many functions governed by HA depend upon interaction with binding proteins or HA-receptors reviewed comprehensively by Day and Prestwich.26 Of these, Stabilin-2, which was discovered as the liver hyaluronan receptor for endocytosis (HARE) and the lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor (LYVE-1) play key roles in HA turnover in the vascular systems.27,28 A growing body of literature implicates HA production and turnover as dynamic events capable of regulating cellular responses in polymer size and binding-partner-dependent context. While many receptors and binding proteins are known to interact with HA, the functions of HA and its receptors as they pertain to EC behaviors are described in detail in this review.

HA Regulates Endothelial Behavior in Response to Shear Forces

ECs are exposed to dynamic extracellular stimuli at the luminal surface by the flow of blood and its components. Within the glycocalyx, HA and its binding proteins can transmit these extracellular signals via “outside-in” signaling, which functions as a mechanosensory transducer regulating several critical EC behaviors.29 HA synthases are primarily regulated at the level of transcription, and the resulting HA polymer is regulated by the coordinated activity of hyaluronan synthase (HAS), hyaluronidase, substrate availability, and other factors such as reactive oxygen species and ultra-violet light.3033 The HAS enzymes are present at low levels at the plasma membrane until activated in response to various stimuli. Expression of the HAS enzymes and HA abundance varies based upon vessel origin and size.34 In macrovessels, both HAS2 and HAS3 mRNAs are present,35 while only HAS3 is detected in human intestinal microvessels,36 and all three HAS enzymes are present in corneal ECs.37 Despite this heterogeneity, HA synthesis in most vascular and lymphatic ECs is responsive to induction by pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL15, TNF-α, and lipopolysaccharide.38,39 Ablation of HA production in mice by administration of 4-methylumbelliferone (an inhibitor of GAG synthesis) results in widespread EC dysfunction, increased macrophage driven vascular plaque inflammation and atherosclerosis.40

At the EC surface, CD44 tethers HA to the plasma membrane and, through its cytoplasmic tail, interacts with actin-binding ERM proteins.41 Fluid shear stress may then be transmitted via HA-CD44 in the vessel lumen directly to the EC cytoskeleton. For example, in response to shear forces, CD44 activates Rac1 while inhibiting RhoA and promotes localization of adductin-γ to tight junctions strengthening the EC barrier.42 Loss of CD44 leads to increased vessel permeability and release of HA from the EC surface. HA itself can be induced by shear forces, though whether this is regulated by CD44 or other binding proteins is not known. In vitro studies of ECs subject to arterial pulsatile flow conditions promotes increased hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2) expression and HA production via the Akt pathway.43

While flow is capable of inducing HA synthesis, HA and CD44 interactions modulate EC spreading and production of the vasodilator, nitric oxide (NO).44 This is consistent with early implications of the glycocalyx as a regulator of flow-induced vasorelaxation, and with clinical observations indicating that HA destruction at the EC surface in diabetes leads to a decrease in NO production.4548 A dominant mechanism that defines EC dysfunction is reduced constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression. In the context of vascular lesions, continuous exposure of endothelia to high shear can impair NO production, which in turn correlates with the loss of pericellular HA. Femoral arteries perfused with hyaluronidase decreased endothelial NO synthesis, consistent with the aforementioned direct correlation of HA and NO.49 Hyaluronidase treatment of cultured, primary bovine aortic ECs also results in a dramatic loss of shear-induced NO, but does not affect prostacyclin synthesis.50 As hyaluronidase treatment had no effect upon prostacyclin production, these data suggest that the HA-dependent mechanism exists independent of the cellular compartment containing NO production.

Regulation of the Endothelial Barrier

Maintenance of endothelial barrier function is a critical process in which HA plays numerous roles. On the luminal surface of the capillary, HA maintains and controls microvascular permeability by acting as a molecular sieve, restricting access of inflammatory molecules and cells while also regulating endothelial cell–cell junctions. Several studies have demonstrated that treatment with hyaluronidase leads to a permissive capillary barrier allowing plasma proteins to enter tissue resulting in edema and proteinuria.3,10,51 Enzymatic degradation of HA at the EC surface can result in a compromised EC barrier, as small HA fragments can induce blood–brain barrier permeability in a CD44-dependent manner.52 While CD44-null mice do not exhibit elevated vascular permeability at baseline compared with controls, upon histamine challenge, barrier function is significantly compromised in CD44-deficient mice.53 Loss of CD44 leads to a corresponding decrease in platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) and VE-cadherin in cultured ECs and inactivation of the Hippo pathway.54 Restoration of CD44 expression leads to a recovery of both VE-cadherin and CD31 expression as well as barrier function. Loss of CD44 appears to lead to widespread downstream EC dysfunction with impaired formation and maintenance of both adherens and tight junctions. While HA likely plays a role in these observations, its specific role remains to be defined.

Other aspects of barrier function by CD44 have been demonstrated to depend upon its interactions with HA at the EC surface. For instance, high molecular weight (HMW)-HA bound to CD44 recruits the S1P1 receptor into lipid rafts leading to AKT-mediated phosphorylation of S1P1 and enhancement of EC barrier function.55 HA fragments may compete for HMW-HA binding to CD44 leading to downstream activation of the S1P3 receptor via ROCK1/2 and subsequent loss of barrier function.55 Administration of HMW-HA in a rat model of ventilator-induced acute lung injury exhibits protective effects by enhancing EC barrier function and reducing fluid accumulation.56 HA also has been shown to bind angiopoietin-1 and regulate Tie2 receptor signaling in the control of glomerular endothelial barrier function.57

Thrombin is a potent inducer of EC permeability and disrupts the EC barrier by activation of protease activated receptors (PARs). In a similar fashion, the activity of factor VII activating protease is also known as HA binding protein 2 (HABP2), and promotes EC barrier disruption in a mechanism similar to thrombin. Treatment of ECs with HABP2 leads to barrier disruption by activation of PAR-1 and 3. Co-stimulation of ECs with HABP2 and either HMW-HA or HA fragments demonstrates that HMW-HA inhibits HABP2 activity while HA fragments promotes protease activity.58 Thrombin has also been shown to bind to HA and its proteolytic activity can regulate monocyte adhesion to HA in inflammatory settings.59 Whether HA may play a general role in the regulation of PAR activation by thrombin and other proteases requires further study.

Alteration of HA at the EC surface at either the level of synthesis or degradation can control permeability of both transmigrating cells and cytokines and when dysregulated may promote disease.

Control of Angiogenesis and Vascularization

The regulation of EC proliferation, migration, and capillary formation is regulated not only by the activities of well-studied growth factors (e.g., VEGF, fibroblast growth factor [FGF]) but also by components of the ECM, including HA.60 Angiogenesis is initiated by localized release of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors from ECs in response to disease, injury-induced inflammation, hypoxia, and other conditions. Inhibiting HA synthesis through treatment of ECs with 4-MU suppressed proliferation in cultured cells, as well as angiogenesis in a rodent model of endometriosis without significant changes in the number of proliferating or apoptotic cells.61 Large polymers of HA in the range of 106-107 Da support EC homeostasis by inhibiting proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and inflammation, while HA fragments generated by hyaluronidases in turn drive EC proliferation,62,63 migration,64 and secretion of angiogenic factors.65

Control of angiogenic and proliferative responses in ECs by HA depends upon polymer size and differential involvement of at least two HA receptors: CD44 and receptor for HA-mediated motility (RHAMM). Both receptors are present at the EC surface and interact with HA, yet govern different EC functions. Neutralization of CD44 with blocking antibodies suppresses the proliferative effect of HA, while blockade of RHAMM has no effect on proliferation under the same conditions.66 Under steady-state conditions, CD44-HA interactions can suppress EC proliferation and expression of early response genes c-fos and c-jun in an HA-size dependent fashion.67 In this context, small HA oligosaccharides promote proliferation while high-molecular weight polymers demonstrate a suppressive effect.52 Neutralization of HA via a soluble recombinant HA-binding domain of CD44 inhibits EC proliferation, similar to antibody-mediated inhibition, and also led to an inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis in vivo in both chick and murine models.68 It is possible that HA may exert these opposing effects based on whether cellular receptors are engaged in monovalent clusters or in a distributed, polyvalent manner. Furthermore, treatment with either HA oligosaccharides, high-molecular weight HA, or soluble receptor decoys may alter receptor organization at the cell surface.

CD44 and RHAMM also differ in their ability to support EC adhesion to HA. Whereas CD44 promotes HUVEC adhesion to immobilized HA,69 RHAMM does not promote adhesion, but can retain soluble HA at the EC surface.66 This seems in agreement with data suggesting CD44-HA interactions with HA fragments generated during angiogenesis can promote proliferation, as adhesion and spreading are essential in EC proliferation. Both CD44 and RHAMM can support EC migration, and neutralization of either receptor inhibits EC tube formation in vitro. However, examination of a murine neovascularization model, in which vessels form within subcutaneous Matrigel plugs containing bFGF, antibody-mediated neutralization of CD44 shows little effect on vessel formation, while anti-RHAMM inhibits the angiogenic response entirely.66 Modification of HA with the heavy chains of inter-alpha trypsin inhibitor (IαI) promotes CD44 binding70 and mice deficient for IαI also have complete loss of angiogenesis in the matrigel model, but only impaired angiogenesis in a model of bleomycin-induced lung injury.71

CD44 and RHAMM likely act in a synergistic fashion in some contexts but have differential requirements in HA-mediated angiogenesis. In support of this, studies have indeed demonstrated that CD44 and RHAMM work in concert. HMW-HA (~1 mDa) induces activation of PKCδ via CD44, leading to co-localization of RHAMM with ERK, and activation of TGFBR1. Activation of TGFBR1 is independent of smad2, and promotes vessel remodeling by induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and MMP2.72 Single knock down studies of CD44 or RHAMM both inhibit responses to low molecular weight HA induced EC tube formation in matrigel through regulation of differential pathways but share responses via ERK1/2 and cdk1/2. Knock down of CD44 abolishes PKC-α, actin stress fiber formation, and induction of MMP9, whereas knock down of RHAMM appears to lead to activation of glycogen synthase serine kinase 3a.73

HA as a Novel Immune Cell Recruitment Molecule

The presence of a “cable-like” monocyte-adhesive form of HA at the endothelial surface in response to inflammatory stimuli was first reported by de la Motte and colleagues and is implicated as an early event in the progression of inflammatory diseases (Fig. 1).21 Earlier studies from Siegelman and colleagues demonstrated that induction of HA by both TNF-α and IL-1 stimulated ECs from small vessels (but not from large vessels) is capable of mediating leukocyte adhesion23 and sufficient to support rolling adhesions under physiological laminar flow similar to the selectins.74

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Endothelial cells produce adhesive “cable like” hyaluronan in response to inflammatory stimuli. Human lung microvascular endothelial cells were stained for HA (green), CD31(red), and nuclei (blue). (A) Under normal conditions HA is present as a pericellular coat that is non-adhesive. (B) In response to an inciting stimulus (e.g., poly (I:C)), HA synthesis is increased, and HA adopts a “cable-like” adhesive structure. Scale bar indicates 20 μm. Abbreviation: HA, hyaluronan.

CD44, the best studied receptor for HA, is constitutively expressed on leukocytes in an inactive form under resting conditions. On the EC surface, HA acts as a ligand for this receptor, allowing leukocytes to roll on pericellular HA. The interplay between receptor and ligand is not only limited to leukocyte-endothelial cell binding, as it also performs differential roles in leukocyte recruitment and activation.

For T-cells, rolling is not the only CD44-HA interaction during inflammation. Anti-inflammatory HMW-HA has been shown in vitro to upregulate FoxP3 in human regulatory T-cells, as well as upregulate the suppressive ability of these Treg cells.75 While cytotoxic T-cells express the necessary CD44 receptor to bind to and roll along HA surfaces, these cells cannot effectively travel to sites of inflammation without a mechanism that halts their circulation. In vitro studies in liver sinusoids show that CD8+ T-cells require platelets, aggregating to the tissue by HA-CD44 interactions, as docking sites before continuing to roll along the ECM toward the inflamed site.76,77 However, the mechanism for T-cell-platelet docking has not been resolved. While this T cell-platelet interaction has only been scrutinized within liver cells, this platelet CD44-dependent recruitment mechanism likely occurs in many other inflammatory disease states.

While platelets do not bind to HA on the surface of ECs under normal conditions, platelets interact with HA produced by the inflamed vasculature during disease.78 Once bound, platelets translocate hyaluronidase-2 (HYAL2) from within alpha-granules to the platelet surface, and subsequently degrade HA polymers from the cell surface.79,80 HA fragments generated by HYAL2 can stimulate activation of monocytes, macrophages, and ECs presumably through toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4.36,81 This initiates activation of these cells, as well as the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-12, IL-1b, and TNF-a.80 Degradation of HA by platelets has been demonstrated to regulate leukocyte transmigration,78 and may function to control leukocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation in various disease states. In the case of lung inflammation, both TLRs 2 and 4 play crucial roles in the inflammatory response to HA fragments, but the specific contributions of platelets and ECs in this process is not well studied.82

In the context of eosinophils, Ohkawara et al.83 have shown that the interaction of soluble HA and CD44 expressed on eosinophils lead to aggregation of the granulocytes and the release of TGF-B. Eosinophil-derived TGF-B has been implicated in airway remodeling during allergic asthma, and TGF-B at low concentrations can induce eosinophil recruitment; together these suggest that HA-CD44 interactions could be a main driver for inflammatory reactions such as asthma.84,85 This interaction has not yet been studied in neutrophils, but as both cells are granulocytes, there is a high likelihood that neutrophils utilize this same mechanism as well.

Like other leukocytes, neutrophils bind to the endothelium in response to inflammation in part due to CD44-HA interaction, as seen in liver injury. However, the interactions between HA and neutrophils are hardly limited to HA at the EC surface.86 Soluble HA acts as a priming agent of neutrophils, activating GSK-3 pathways, but does not mediate neutrophil aggregation and movement, unlike HMW-HA.87 Recently, Leng et al. proposed that the peptide ECRG4 is released by healthy liver tissue and downregulates the expression of CD44 in neutrophils. During tissue injury or inflammation; however, the concentration of produced ECRG4 decreases, resulting in the increased expression of neutrophil CD44. This regulation, coupled with the HA fragments released during inflammation that activate CD44, possibly recruits active neutrophils to inflamed areas.88

Dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages are unique among the leukocytes as they present extracellular HA on their surface.8991 This HA “coat” allows DCs and macrophages to bind to LYVE-1), a receptor structurally related to CD44, expressed in lymphatic endothelial tissues.89 While CD44 is the predominant HA receptor on vascular ECs, LYVE-1 exists as the principle receptor for pericellular HA in the lymphatic endothelium, where it is located at distinct overlapping junctions of the lymphatic capillaries. This unique expression pattern regulates the entry and migration of antigen-presenting DCs within the lymph node. DCs migrate toward the CCL21 gradient at the surface of the lymphatic vessels where LYVE-1 engages HA present on the DC surface, allowing the DC to dock with lymphatic trans-migratory cup structures which mediate DC adhesion and subsequent entry into the lymphatic system.92,93 In the case of macrophages, LYVE-1 interactions with HA is required for macrophage clearance by the lymphatics and resolution of myocardial infarction.91 Recent studies demonstrate that cortical actin networks regulate LYVE-1 lateral diffusion and receptor clustering in the lymphatic endothelium, supporting the observation that selective engagement of LYVE-1 with HA within the glycocalyx facilitates leukocyte adhesion and transmigration.94 In contrast to LYVE-1 which does not interact with the cytoskeleton but rather appears constrained by it, CD44 binds to the actin cytoskeleton via actin adapter proteins to promote CD44 clustering.41,95 Understanding cues that promote in vivo dynamic clustering which allows LYVE-1 to discriminate HA present on the surface of leukocytes from soluble HA requires further study. Unlike other endothelial beds, LYVE-1 is present in liver and spleen vascular sinuses, but its role in these locations is not established.

In conclusion, the study of HA and its interacting partners with respect to the endothelium in both health and disease has revealed that HA is capable of regulating a diverse repertoire of functions summarized in this review (Fig. 2). The elucidation of HA-dependent mechanisms that regulate EC function is crucial as it has significant roles in health and clear impact upon virtually all inflammatory disease states. Importantly, work discussed in this article highlights the functions of HA beyond that of a structural component of the ECM. While there has been significant emphasis on particular HA receptors such as CD44, more extensive studies are needed to delineate the roles of other HA-binding proteins such as LYVE-1 and HABP2, both of which may play significant roles in vascular disease. A number of elegant studies discussed within this review demonstrate that HA and LYVE-1 interactions are critical regulators of leukocyte egress from tissue during disease. Understanding how LYVE-1 and HA are regulated in the context of chronic inflammatory diseases may provide a unique opportunity to tip the balance in favor of resolution by developing therapeutic strategies to promote LYVE-1 clustering. The endothelium is intimately associated with inflammation, progression, and resolution of disease in essentially all tissues and organs. Although HA has emerged as a novel immune recruitment molecule, it is still not well understood how HA modified with the heavy chains of IαI contributes to disease progression or resolution. Circulating HA levels associate with several inflammatory conditions, as does circulating levels of heavy chain modified HA, suggesting HA is released by the endothelium. The regulatory networks which control HAS expression and HA synthesis have received considerably more study than the corresponding hyaluronidases and represent an important area of future study. Understanding the primary mechanisms by which HA is released from the endothelium either by the activity of hyaluronidases, proteolytic “sheddases” releasing the HA-binding CD44 ectodomain, or direct secretion of HA by HAS enzymes would allow for a more nuanced understanding of how HA regulates immune cell recruitment and EC functions. While glycocalyx degradation can promote immune cell and platelet adhesion to the endothelium, it may also be possible that HA shed into circulation might act as a decoy ligand or act as a signaling molecule for circulating immune cells. From this point of view, further defining the mechanisms by which HA and its binding proteins participate in endothelial regulation may present innovative strategies for vascular pathologies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Critical endothelial cell functions are regulated by hyaluronan (HA). HA plays a role regulating diverse but important endothelial cell behaviors. In response to shear forces (A) HA synthesis is increased and promotes NO production. (B) At endothelial cell junctions, HA participates in signaling responses in barrier integrity mediated by CD44. Upon loss of CD44 and tonic HA signals, PECAM-1 is disrupted leading to barrier dysfunction. (C) HA supports vessel integrity, regulating angiogenesis through overlapping activities with RHAMM and CD44. (D) Under normal conditions, HA is non-adhesive. But in response to inflammation, HA supports leukocyte recruitment to the EC surface. Platelets also interact with HA, and can degrade it generating bioactive HA fragments capable of regulating inflammation. Abbreviations: PECAM-1, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; RHAMM, receptor for HA-mediated motility; EC, endothelial cells.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Carol de la Motte, Dr. Vincent Hascall, and our colleagues in the International Society for Hyaluronan Sciences for their helpful discussions, generosity, and support.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Contributions: KAQ drafted the manuscript and arranged figures; RAM drafted the manuscript and reviewed the manuscript and figures for form; and ACP drafted the manuscript, critically reviewed manuscript and figures for intellectual content and form. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was financially supported by the National Institutes of Health [HL135265] to A.C.P.

Contributor Information

Kimberly A. Queisser, Molecular Medicine Program, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Rebecca A. Mellema, Division of Microbiology & Immunology, Department of Pathology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Aaron C. Petrey, Molecular Medicine Program, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Division of Microbiology & Immunology, Department of Pathology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Literature Cited

  • 1. Manou D, Caon I, Bouris P, Triantaphyllidou IE, Giaroni C, Passi A, Karamanos NK, Vigetti D, Theocharis AD. The complex interplay between extracellular matrix and cells in tissues. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1952:1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Luft JH. Fine structures of capillary and endocapillary layer as revealed by ruthenium red. Fed Proc. 1966;25(6):1773–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gao L, Lipowsky HH. Composition of the endothelial glycocalyx and its relation to its thickness and diffusion of small solutes. Microvasc Res. 2010. December;80(3):394–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Squire JM, Chew M, Nneji G, Neal C, Barry J, Michel C. Quasi-periodic substructure in the microvessel endothelial glycocalyx: a possible explanation for molecular filtering? J Struct Biol. 2001;136(3):239–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Megens RTA, Reitsma S, Schiffers PHM, Hilgers RHP, De Mey JGR, Slaaf DW, Oude Egbrink MGA, Van Zandvoort MAMJ. Two-photon microscopy of vital murine elastic and muscular arteries: combined structural and functional imaging with subcellular resolution. J Vasc Res. 2007. February;44(2):87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Reitsma S, Slaaf DW, Vink H, Van Zandvoort MAMJ, Oude Egbrink MGA. The endothelial glycocalyx: composition, functions, and visualization. Pflugers Arch. 2007;454:345–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gouverneur M, Van Den Berg B, Nieuwdorp M, Stroes E, Vink H. Vasculoprotective properties of the endothelial glycocalyx: effects of fluid shear stress. J Intern Med. 2006;259:393–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grundmann S, Schirmer SH, Hekking LHP, Post JA, Ionita MG, Groot D, de Royen N, van Berg B, van den Vink H, Moser M, Bode C, Kleijn D, de Pasterkamp G, Piek JJ, Hoefer IE. Endothelial glycocalyx dimensions are reduced in growing collateral arteries and modulate leucocyte adhesion in arteriogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2009. September;13(9B):3463–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Reitsma S, Oude Egbrink MGA, Vink H, Van Den Berg BM, Lima Passos V, Engels W, Slaaf DW, Van Zandvoort MAMJ. Endothelial glycocalyx structure in the intact carotid artery: a two-photon laser scanning microscopy study. J Vasc Res. 2011. June;48(4):297–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Van den Berg BM, Vink H, Spaan JAE. The endothelial glycocalyx protects against myocardial edema. Circ Res. 2003. April 4;92(6):592–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Viola M, Karousou E, D’Angelo M, Moretto P, Caon I, De Luca G, Passi A, Vigetti D. Extracellular matrix in atherosclerosis: hyaluronan and proteoglycans insights. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23:2958–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Viola M, Karousou E, D’Angelo ML, Caon I, De Luca G, Passi A, Vigetti D. Regulated hyaluronan synthesis by vascular cells. Int J Cell Biol. 2015;2015:208–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sainio A, Jokela T, Tammi MI, Järveläinen H. Hyperglycemic conditions modulate connective tissue reorganization by human vascular smooth muscle cells through stimulation of hyaluronan synthesis. Glycobiology. 2010;20:1117–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wang G, de Vries MR, Sol WMPJ, van Oeveren-Rietdijk AM, de Boer HC, van Zonneveld AJ, Quax PHA, Rabelink TJ, van den Berg BM. Loss of endothelial glycocalyx hyaluronan impairs endothelial stability and adaptive vascular remodeling after arterial ischemia. Cells. 2020;9:824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sainio A, Takabe P, Oikari S, Salomäki-Myftari H, Koulu M, Söderström M, Pasonen-Seppänen S, Järveläinen H. Metformin decreases hyaluronan synthesis by vascular smooth muscle cells. J Investig Med. 2020;68:383–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vogl-Willis CA, Edwards IJ. High-glucose-induced structural changes in the heparan sulfate proteoglycan, perlecan, of cultured human aortic endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004. April 7;1672(1):36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hiebert LM, Han J, Mandal AK. Glycosaminoglycans, hyperglycemia, and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21:1032–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nieuwdorp M, Meuwese MC, Vink H, Hoekstra JBL, Kastelein JJP, Stroes ESG. The endothelial glycocalyx: a potential barrier between health and vascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005;16:507–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Frati-Munari AC. Medical significance of endothelial glycocalyx. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2013;83:303–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Butler MJ, Down CJ, Foster RR, Satchell SC. The pathological relevance of increased endothelial glycocalyx permeability. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;190:742–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Goligorsky MS, Sun D. Glycocalyx in endotoxemia and sepsis. Am J Pathol. 2020;190:791–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yang Y, Schmidt EP. The endothelial glycocalyx. Tissue Barriers. 2013. January;1(1):e23494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Petrey AC, de la Motte CA. Hyaluronan, a crucial regulator of inflammation. Front Immunol. 2014;5:101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Freeman SA, Vega A, Riedl M, Collins RF, Ostrowski PP, Woods EC, Bertozzi CR, Tammi MI, Lidke DS, Johnson P, Mayor S, Jaqaman K, Grinstein S. Transmembrane pickets connect cyto- and pericellular skeletons forming barriers to receptor engagement. Cell. 2018. January 11;172(1–2):305–17.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fan J, Sun Y, Xia Y, Tarbell JM, Fu BM. Endothelial surface glycocalyx (ESG) components and ultra-structure revealed by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Biorheology. 2019;56(2–3):77–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Day AJ, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronan-binding proteins: tying up the giant. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4585–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Fraser JRE, Laurent TC, Pertoft H, Baxter E. Plasma clearance, tissue distribution and metabolism of hyaluronic acid injected intravenously in the rabbit. Biochem J. 1981;200:415–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Prevo R, Banerji S, Ferguson DJP, Clasper S, Jackson DG. Mouse LYVE-1 is an endocytic receptor for hyaluronan in lymphatic endothelium. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:19420–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tarbell JM, Pahakis MY. Mechanotransduction and the glycocalyx. J Intern Med. 2006;259:339–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hascall VC, Wang A, Tammi M, Oikari S, Tammi R, Passi A, Vigetti D, Hanson RW, Hart GW. The dynamic metabolism of hyaluronan regulates the cytosolic concentration of UDP-GlcNAc. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:14–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Caon I, Parnigoni A, Viola M, Karousou E, Passi A, Vigetti D. Cell energy metabolism and hyaluronan synthesis. J Histochem Cytochem. Epub ahead of print 6 July 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Šoltés L, Mendichi R, Kogan G, Schiller J, Stankovská M, Arnhold J. Degradative action of reactive oxygen species on hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:659–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Monzon ME, Fregien N, Schmid N, Falcon NS, Campos M, Casalino-Matsuda SM, Forteza RM. Reactive oxygen species and hyaluronidase 2 regulate airway epithelial hyaluronan fragmentation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(34):26126–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20554532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lokeshwar VB, Selzer MG. Differences in hyaluronic acid-mediated functions and signaling in arterial, microvessel, and vein-derived human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(36):27641–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10882722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vigetti D, Genasetti A, Karousou E, Viola M, Moretto P, Clerici M, Deleonibus S, De Luca G, Hascall VC, Passi A. Proinflammatory cytokines induce hyaluronan synthesis and monocyte adhesion in human endothelial cells through hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2) and the nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(32):24639–45. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20522558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kessler S, Rho H, West G, Fiocchi C, Drazba J, de la Motte C. Hyaluronan (HA) deposition precedes and promotes leukocyte recruitment in intestinal inflammation. Clin Transl Sci. 2008;1(1):57–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20443819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Usui T, Amano S, Oshika T, Suzuki K, Miyata K, Araie M, Heldin P, Yamashita H. Expression regulation of hyaluronan synthase in corneal endothelial cells. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3261–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mohamadzadeh M, DeGrendele H, Arizpe H, Estess P, Siegelman M. Proinflammatory stimuli regulate endothelial hyaluronan expression and CD44/HA-dependent primary adhesion. J Clin Invest. 1998. January 1;101(1):97–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Vigetti D, Karousou E, Viola M, Deleonibus S, De Luca G, Passi A. Hyaluronan: biosynthesis and signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:2452–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nagy N, Freudenberger T, Melchior-Becker A, Röck K, Ter Braak M, Jastrow H, Kinzig M, Lucke S, Suvorava T, Kojda G, Weber AA, Sörgel F, Levkau B, Ergün S, Fischer JW. Inhibition of hyaluronan synthesis accelerates murine atherosclerosis: novel insights into the role of hyaluronan synthesis. Circulation. 2010. November 30;122(22):2313–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mori T, Kitano K, Terawaki SI, Maesaki R, Fukami Y, Hakoshima T. Structural basis for CD44 recognition by ERM proteins. J Biol Chem. 2008. October 24;283(43):29602–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. DeOre BJ, Partyka PP, Fan F, Galie PA. CD44 regulates blood-brain barrier integrity in response to fluid shear stress. bioRxiv. 2020. January 29 Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.28.924043v1
  • 43. Maroski J, Vorderwülbecke BJ, Fiedorowicz K, Da Silva-Azevedo L, Siegel G, Marki A, Pries AR, Zakrzewicz A. Shear stress increases endothelial hyaluronan synthase 2 and hyaluronan synthesis especially in regard to an atheroprotective flow profile. Exp Physiol. 2011;96(9):977–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yasuda T. Hyaluronan inhibits p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase via the receptors in rheumatoid arthritis chondrocytes stimulated with fibronectin fragment. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(11):1259–67. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20552237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Becker BF, Jacob M, Leipert S, Salmon AHJ, Chappell D. Degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx in clinical settings: searching for the sheddases. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:389–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Satchell SC, Tooke JE. What is the mechanism of microalbuminuria in diabetes: a role for the glomerular endothelium? Diabetologia. 2008;51:714–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lopez-Quintero SV. High glucose attenuates shear-induced changes in endothelial hydraulic conductivity by degrading the glycocalyx. PLoS ONE. 2013. November 18;8(11):e78954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Broekhuizen LN, Lemkes BA, Mooij HL, Meuwese MC, Verberne H, Holleman F, Schlingemann RO, Nieuwdorp M, Stroes ESG, Vink H. Effect of sulodexide on endothelial glycocalyx and vascular permeability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2010. December; 53(12):2646–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mochizuki S, Vink H, Hiramatsu O, Kajita T, Shigeto F, Spaan JAE, Kajiya F. Role of hyaluronic acid glycosaminoglycans in shear-induced endothelium-derived nitric oxide release. Am J Physiol. 2003. August 1;285(2): H722–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Pahakis MY, Kosky JR, Dull RO, Tarbell JM. The role of endothelial glycocalyx components in mechanotransduction of fluid shear stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007. March 30;355(1):228–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Henry CBS, Duling BR. Permeation of the luminal capillary glycocalyx is determined by hyaluronan. Am J Physiol. 1999. August;277:H508–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Al-Ahmad AJ, Patel R, Palecek SP, Shusta EV. Hyaluronan impairs the barrier integrity of brain microvascular endothelial cells through a CD44-dependent pathway. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019. September 1;39(9): 1759–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Flynn KM, Michaud M, Canosa S, Madri JA. CD44 regulates vascular endothelial barrier integrity via a PECAM-1 dependent mechanism. Angiogenesis. 2013. July;16(3):689–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tsuneki M, Madri JA. CD44 regulation of endothelial cell proliferation and apoptosis via modulation of CD31 and VE-cadherin expression. J Biol Chem. 2014. February 28;289(9):5357–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Singleton PA, Dudek SM, Ma SF, Garcia JGN. Transactivation of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors is essential for vascular barrier regulation: novel role for hyaluronan and CD44 receptor family. J Biol Chem. 2006. November 10;281(45):34381–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Liu YY, Lee CH, Dedaj R, Zhao H, Mrabat H, Sheidlin A, Syrkina O, Huang PM, Garg HG, Hales CA, Quinn DA. High-molecular-weight hyaluronan—a possible new treatment for sepsis-induced lung injury: a preclinical study in mechanically ventilated rats. Crit Care. 2008. August 8;12(4):R102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Van Den Berg BM, Wang G, Boels MGS, Avramut MC, Jansen E, Sol WMPJ, Lebrin F, Van Zonneveld AJ, De Koning EJP, Vink H, Gröne HJ, Carmeliet P, Van Der Vlag J, Rabelink TJ. Glomerular function and structural integrity depend on hyaluronan synthesis by glomerular endothelium. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:1886–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Mambetsariev N, Mirzapoiazova T, Mambetsariev B, Sammani S, Lennon FE, Garcia JGN, Singleton PA. Hyaluronic acid binding protein 2 is a novel regulator of vascular integrity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:483–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Petrey AC, de la Motte CA. Thrombin cleavage of inter-α-inhibitor heavy chain 1 regulates leukocyte binding to an inflammatory hyaluronan matrix. J Biol Chem. 2016. November 18;291(47):24324–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27679489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Davis GE, Senger DR. Endothelial extracellular matrix: biosynthesis, remodeling, and functions during vascular morphogenesis and neovessel stabilization. Circ Res. 2005;97(11):1093–107. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16306453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Olivares CN, Alaniz LD, Menger MD, Barañao RI, Laschke MW, Meresman GF. Inhibition of hyaluronic acid synthesis suppresses angiogenesis in developing endometriotic lesions. PLoS ONE. 2016. March 1;11(3): e0152302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Slevin M, Krupinski J, Kumar S, Gaffney J. Angiogenic oligosaccharides of hyaluronan induce protein tyrosine kinase activity in endothelial cells and activate a cytoplasmic signal transduction pathway resulting in proliferation. Lab Investig. 1998;78:987–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. West DC, Hampson IN, Arnold F, Kumar S. Angiogenesis induced by degradation products of hyaluronic acid. Science. 1985;228:1324–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sattar A, Rooney P, Kumar S, Pye D, West DC, Scott I, Ledger P. Application of angiogenic oligosaccharides of hyaluronan increases blood vessel numbers in rat skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103:576–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Takahashi Y, Li L, Kamiryo M, Asteriou T, Moustakas A, Yamashita H, Heldin P. Hyaluronan fragments induce endothelial cell differentiation in a CD44- and CXCL1/GRO1-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280:24195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Savani RC, Cao G, Pooler PM, Zaman A, Zhou Z, DeLisser HM. Differential involvement of the hyaluronan (HA) receptors CD44 and receptor for HA-mediated motility in endothelial cell function and angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:36770–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Deed R, Rooney P, Kumar P, Norton JD, Smith J, Freemont AJ, Kumar S. Early-response gene signalling is induced by angiogenic oligosaccharides of hyaluronan in endothelial cells. Inhibition by non-angiogenic, high-molecular-weight hyaluronan. Int J Cancer. 1997;71(2):251–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9139851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Päll T, Gad A, Kasak L, Drews M, Strömblad S, Kogerman P. Recombinant CD44-HABD is a novel and potent direct angiogenesis inhibitor enforcing endothelial cell-specific growth inhibition independently of hyaluronic acid binding. Oncogene. 2004;23:7874–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lokeshwar VB, Lida N, Bourguignon LYW. The cell adhesion molecule, GP116, is a new CD44 variant (ex14/v10) involved in hyaluronic acid binding and endothelial cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(39):23853–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Zhuo L, Kanamori A, Kannagi R, Itano N, Wu J, Hamaguchi M, Ishiguro N, Kimata K. SHAP potentiates the CD44-mediated leukocyte adhesion to the hyaluronan substratum. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(29):20303–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16702221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Garantziotis S, Zudaire E, Trempus CS, Hollingsworth JW, Jiang D, Lancaster LH, Richardson E, Zhuo L, Cuttitta F, Brown KK, Noble PW, Kimata K, Schwartz DA. Serum inter-α-trypsin inhibitor and matrix hyaluronan promote angiogenesis in fibrotic lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:939–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Park D, Kim Y, Kim H, Kim K, Lee YS, Choe J, Hahn JH, Lee H, Jeon J, Choi C, Kim YM, Jeoung D. Hyaluronic acid promotes angiogenesis by inducing RHAMM-TGFβ receptor interaction via CD44-PKCδ. Mol Cells. 2012;33:563–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Matou-Nasri S, Gaffney J, Kumar S, Slevin M. Oligosaccharides of hyaluronan induce angiogenesis through distinct CD44 and RHAMM-mediated signalling pathways involving Cdc2 and γ-adducin. Int J Oncol. 2009;35:761–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Nandi A, Estess P, Siegelman MH. Hyaluronan anchoring and regulation on the surface of vascular endothelial cells is mediated through the functionally active form of CD44. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:14939–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Bollyky PL, Lord JD, Masewicz SA, Evanko SP, Buckner JH, Wight TN, Nepom GT. Cutting edge: high molecular weight hyaluronan promotes the suppressive effects of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2007;179:744–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Guidotti LG, Inverso D, Sironi L, Di Lucia P, Fioravanti J, Ganzer L, Fiocchi A, Vacca M, Aiolfi R, Sammicheli S, Mainetti M, Cataudella T, Raimondi A, Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza G, Protzer U, Ruggeri ZM, Chisari FV, Isogawa M, Sitia G, Iannacone M. Immunosurveillance of the liver by intravascular effector CD8 + T cells. Cell. 2015. April 23;161(3):486–500. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25892224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Benechet AP, Iannacone M. Determinants of hepatic effector CD8+ T cell dynamics. J Hepatol. 2017;66:228–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Petrey AC, Obery DR, Kessler SP, Zawerton A, Flamion B, de la Motte CA. Platelet hyaluronidase-2 regulates the early stages of inflammatory disease in colitis. Blood. 2019. August 29;134(9):765–75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31262781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Albeiroti S, Ayasoufi K, Hill DR, Shen B, de la Motte CA. Platelet hyaluronidase-2: an enzyme that translocates to the surface upon activation to function in extracellular matrix degradation. Blood. 2015;125(9):1460–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. de la Motte C, Nigro J, Vasanji A, Rho H, Kessler S, Bandyopadhyay S, Danese S, Fiocchi C, Stern R. Platelet-derived hyaluronidase 2 cleaves hyaluronan into fragments that trigger monocyte-mediated production of proinflammatory cytokines. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(6):2254–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19443707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Taylor KR, Trowbridge JM, Rudisill JA, Termeer CC, Simon JC, Gallo RL. Hyaluronan fragments stimulate endothelial recognition of injury through TLR4. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17079–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Yu S, Chen S, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Mascarenhas MM, Garg HG, Quinn DA, Homer RJ, Goldstein DR, Bucala R, Lee PJ, Medzhitov R, Noble PW. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat Med. 2005. November;11(11):1173–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Ohkawara Y, Tamura G, Iwasaki T, Tanaka A, Kikuchi T, Shirato K. Activation and transforming growth factor-β production in eosinophils by hyaluronan. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;23:444–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Luttmann W, Franz P, Matthys H, Virchow JC. Effects of TGF-β on eosinophil chemotaxis. Scand J Immunol. 1998;47:127–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Fattouh R, Jordana M. TGF-β, eosinophils and IL-13 in allergic airway remodeling: a critical appraisal with therapeutic considerations. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2008;7:224–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. McDonald B, McAvoy EF, Lam F, Gill V, de la Motte C, Savani RC, Kubes P. Interaction of CD44 and hyaluronan is the dominant mechanism for neutrophil sequestration in inflamed liver sinusoids. J Exp Med. 2008;205(4):915–27. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18362172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Niemietz I, Moraes AT, Sundqvist M, Brown KL. Hyaluronan primes the oxidative burst in human neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. 2020. May 18;108:705–13. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/JLB.3MA0220-216RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Dorschner RA, Lee J, Cohen O, Costantini T, Baird A, Eliceiri BP. ECRG4 regulates neutrophil recruitment and CD44 expression during the inflammatory response to injury. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaay0518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Jackson DG. Hyaluronan in the lymphatics: the key role of the hyaluronan receptor LYVE-1 in leucocyte trafficking. Matrix Biol. 2019;78–9:219–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Jackson D. Lymphatic regulation of cellular trafficking. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2014;5:258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Lawrance W, Banerji S, Day AJ, Bhattacharjee S, Jackson DG. Binding of hyaluronan to the native lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor LYVE-1 is critically dependent on receptor clustering and hyaluronan organization. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:8014–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Rinaldi E, Baggi F. LYVE-1 is “on stage” now: an emerging player in dendritic cell docking to lymphatic endothelial cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2018;15:663–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Johnson LA, Banerji S, Lawrance W, Gileadi U, Prota G, Holder KA, Roshorm YM, Hanke T, Cerundolo V, Gale NW, Jackson DG. Dendritic cells enter lymph vessels by hyaluronan-mediated docking to the endothelial receptor LYVE-1. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:762–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Stanly TA, Fritzsche M, Banerji S, Shrestha D, Schneider F, Eggeling C, Jackson DG. The cortical actin network regulates avidity-dependent binding of hyaluronan by the lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor LYVE-1. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:5036–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Lokeshwar VB, Fregien N, Bourguignon LYW. Ankyrin-binding domain of CD44(GP85) is required for the expression of hyaluronic acid-mediated adhesion function. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:1099–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry are provided here courtesy of The Histochemical Society

RESOURCES