Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jan 22;60(6):1429–1437. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1533128

DNA methylation patterns of adult survivors of adolescent/young adult Hodgkin lymphoma compared to their unaffected monozygotic twin.

Jun Wang 1, David Van Den Berg 1, Amie E Hwang 1, Daniel Weisenberger 2, Timothy Triche Jr 3,4, Bharat N Nathwani 5, David V Conti 1, Kim Siegmund 1, Thomas M Mack 1,6, Steve Horvath 7, Wendy Cozen 1,6
PMCID: PMC7781082  NIHMSID: NIHMS1520179  PMID: 30668190

Abstract

DNA methylation (DNAm) silences gene expression and may play a role in immune dysregulation that is characteristic of adolescent/young adult Hodgkin lymphoma (AYAHL). We used the Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip to quantify DNAm in blood (N=9, mean age 57.4 y) or saliva (N=36, mean age 50.0 y) from long-term AYAHL survivors and their unaffected co-twins. Epigenetic aging (DNAm age) was calculated using previously described methods and compared between survivors and co-twins using paired t-tests and analyses were stratified by sample type, histology, sex, age at sample collection and time since diagnosis. Differences in blood DNAm age were observed between survivors and unaffected co-twins (64.1 vs. 61.3 years, respectively, P=0.04), especially in females (P=0.01); no differences in saliva DNAm age were observed. Survivors and co-twins had 74 (in blood DNA) and 6 (in saliva DNA) differentially methylated loci. Our results suggest persistent epigenetic aging in AYAHL survivors long after HL cure.

Keywords: Hodgkin Lymphoma, AYA, survivors, twins, blood, saliva, DNA methylation

Introduction

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is the most common form of malignant lymphoma affecting people under the age of 30 in developed countries [1, 2] (https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/hodg.html). Monozygotic (MZ) twins of adolescent and young adult (AYA) HL patients (defined as 15–39 years of age at diagnosis) have a ~100-fold risk compared to the general population, while dizygotic (DZ) twins of patients have a ~7-fold risk similar to that for non-twin siblings [3]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic risk variants in the HLA region and in IL13, REL, PVT1, GATA 3, and TCF3 genes that cumulatively explain less than 5% of genetic risk [4, 5]. There are also strong environmental determinants of HL that include high socioeconomic status, fewer opportunities for microbial exposures in early childhood, and infectious mononucleosis (limited to the Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]+ subtype) [6, 7, 8]. These environmental and genetic factors contribute to the development of a T-helper-Type 2 (Th2) immune phenotype associated with susceptibility among AYAHL patients [7, 9, 10], that may persist after treatment and cure.

The cure rate is generally high, especially among AYAHL, but 5–15% still die of their disease or late effects of therapy within 10 years [11, 12]. A European study reported that premature mortality in young people diagnosed with HL had an economic cost to the European Union of €306,628 per HL death, the second highest of any cancer after melanoma [13]. In addition, late effects cause considerable morbidity, including second primary malignancy, cardiovascular disease and pulmonary fibrosis [11]. For example, AYAHL patients treated with chemotherapy only have a 33-fold increased risk of a late onset leukemia and those treated with both chemotherapy and radiation have a 17-fold increased risk of late onset non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [12]. Chronic fatigue, depression and persistent immune dysfunction are also long-term consequences of the disease and its treatment [14, 15, 16]. The biological basis for these persistent abnormalities is largely unknown but may involve chronic inflammation [17, 18, 19].

DNA methylation (DNAm) is an epigenetic change characterized by the covalent addition of a methyl group to cytosines within the CpG sequence context that can regulate gene expression [20]. DNAm patterns in genes can reflect the pathways involved in disease. Heritability analyses suggest that 18–19% of the variance in DNAm across the genome in MZ and DZ twin pairs is due to heritable factors [21, 22]. These estimates significantly decrease as twins age, suggesting that cumulative environmental exposures may make impact on DNAm.

Horvath et al. developed a measure of cellular aging by examining a pattern of hyper- or hypo-methylation in specific genes that reflects cellular aging and functions as an epigenetic clock [23], consistent across most tissue types. DNAm age measured in leukocytes has been shown to predict all-cause mortality in later life, even after adjusting for known risk factors [24, 25] implying a relationship to biological aging. Markers of physical and mental fitness are associated with the epigenetic clock (lower abilities associated with accelerated aging) [26]. Environmental exposures such as tobacco use and occupational chemical exposures may influence global (genome-wide) and gene-specific DNAm in blood or epithelial cells from healthy subjects [27, 28]. Alkylating agents, used in the multi-drug treatment regimen for HL and other cancers, can also affect DNAm [29].

Several specific DNAm changes have been demonstrated in HL tumors [30, 31] and cell lines [32], but DNAm has not been examined in circulating leukocytes of HL patients. Because twins are matched on genome and to a large extent, early life exposures, a comparison between DNAm between MZ twins may be more meaningful than one between unrelated individuals. We previously reported that AYAHL is associated with increased interleukin-6 (IL6) [9] and decreased interleukin-12 (IL12) production [10] using MZ twin pairs and controls. In addition, we showed that a deficit of early life-fecal-oral exposures [7] and lower fecal microbiota diversity [33] were more common in AYAHL survivors compared to their unaffected twins. Here, we compare DNAm patterns in 23,477 CpG loci in long-term AYAHL survivors to those in their unaffected MZ co-twins to determine whether differences in DNAm persist after treatment and cure.

Methods

Study Population

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California and all participants provided signed written informed consent. Twin pairs discordant for AYAHL were recruited from the International Twin Registry, a volunteer-based registry of twins with chronic diseases throughout the U.S. and Canada developed and maintained at USC [34, 35]. Cases were diagnosed from 1961 to 2004, with a mean year of 1982 and a median year of 1981. Medical records pathology reports, and histopathologic slides were requested and reviewed by a single hematopathologist for diagnostic confirmation. Histological subtype, but not Epstein-Barr virus tumor status, was available for the majority of patients.

We collected blood and/or saliva specimens from 138 HL survivors and their unaffected twins. Blood specimens were shipped by overnight courier to USC, and buffy coats were separated and frozen within 24 hours. Saliva specimens were collected in Oragene (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) kits and returned to USC by mail and were stored in a −20 refrigerator until DNA extraction. Both members of 45 monozygotic (MZ) HL-discordant twin pairs had sufficiently large samples for DNAm determination; nine provided blood and 36 provided saliva samples.

DNAm Profiling

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood and saliva samples and was bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA profiling was performed at the USC Epigenome Center Data Production Facility using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation27 (HM27) BeadChip that concurrently interrogates 27,578 CpG loci covering 14,475 genes. Detailed information for the assay is available at www.illumina.com. The DNA samples for each AYAHL survivor and their unaffected MZ twin were placed in adjacent wells on the same beadchip to mitigate beadchip-to-beadchip and well variation.

Statistical Analysis

The DNAm level of each CpG locus was calculated as a beta value, the ratio of signal from the methylated probe relative to the sum of both methylated and unmethylated probes. Beta values range from 0 (unmethylated) to 1 (fully methylated). CpG loci on the X and Y chromosomes, those containing a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within 5 base pairs of the targeted CpG locus and those containing repetitive elements (repeat length ≥10) were eliminated from data, leaving 23,477 loci for analysis. We applied non-specific filtering by variance to remove the bottom 67% CpG loci to gain power; because the results remained essentially the same, we present results without the filtering.

To assess the effect of HL or its treatment on DNAm, DNAm beta value differences between HL survivors and their unaffected twins were assessed in three ways using paired t-tests: 1) mean DNAm across all loci contained in the array (N = 23,477 loci) (i.e. array-wide mean DNAm); 2) DNAm age using the 353 CpG loci previously developed to measure epigenetic aging [23]; and 3) DNAm differences at each individual CpG locus for 23,477 loci. Briefly, DNAm age was calculated using a pipeline based on a discovery and replication set in multiple tissues using the two Illumina Infinium arrays (27K and 450K), identifying 353 hyper- or hypo-methylated CpG island loci (http://labs.genetics.ucla.edu/horvath/dnamage) that strongly predict age (r2 = 0.96). The beta values of the selected loci were weighted and averaged, producing an epigenetic, or DNAm age. The 353 CpG loci comprising the DNAm measure is presented in Supplementary Table 3. All analyses were performed separately for twins providing blood and saliva samples because of the potential difference in leukocyte subset distribution. Array-wide mean DNAm and DNAm age were evaluated among all participants and by age at and time since diagnosis, sex and histology.

It is known that DNA methylation shows substantial variation in different types of leukocytes [36], thus DNAm measured in blood can be confounded by white blood cell composition. Therefore, we applied Houseman’s algorithm [37] which uses DNAm patterns to assess the mean frequency of granulocytes, monocytes and lymphocytes, to determine whether there were differences in the distribution of these leukocyte cell types between saliva and blood samples. However, we did not adjust for the distribution in the main case-control analysis because of the small number of pairs with blood samples.

All analyses were conducted using R software (version 3.3.3). We accounted for multiple comparisons when comparing DNAm differences at each of the 23,477 CpG loci between the survivors and unaffected co-twins using a false discovery rate adjusted p-value [38], with statistical significance considered to be FDR < 0.05.

Results

Demographics are shown in Table 1. The mean and median age at sample collection of the nine pairs with blood samples were 57.4 (SD: 9.8) and 54 (range: 46–79) years, respectively, and 50.0 (SD: 10.3) and 47.5 (range: 31–68) years for the pairs with saliva samples. Fifty-six percent of the pairs who provided samples were male. All AYAHL survivors were in complete remission and essentially cured. The distribution of follow-up time was skewed in the nine pairs providing blood samples, with a mean and median of 27.6 (SD: 12.0) and 34 (range: 8–42) years, but not for the 36 pairs providing a saliva sample (both mean and median = 24.5 years). Among those with classifiable histology, 85% (6/7) of the AYAHL survivors who provided a blood sample and 62% (18/29) of those who provided a saliva sample had tumors classified as the nodular sclerosis (NS) subtype.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Hodgkin lymphoma survivor twins and their unaffected co-twins.

Blood samples N=9 pairs Saliva samples N=36 pairs
Mean SD Mean SD


Age at diagnosis, y 29.9 11.7 25.5 8.1
Age at sample collection, y 57.4 9.8 50 10.3
 Male 58.6 11 50.9 9.6
 Female 56 7.7 49.3 10.8
Years follow-up since diagnosis, y 27.6 12 24.5 8.8
Median Range Median Range


Age at diagnosis, y 26 17–52 23.5 14–44
Age at sample collection, y 54 46–79 47.5 31–68
 Male 54 51–79 47.5 33–68
 Female 56.5 46–65 47 31–67
Years follow-up since diagnosis, y 34 8–42 24.5 3–46
N % N %


Sex
 Male 5 55.6 16 44.4
 Female 4 44.4 20 55.6
Histology
 Nodular sclerosis 6 66.7 18 50
 Other 1 11.1 11 30.6
 Unknown 2 22.2 7 19.4

Differences in array-wide and loci-specific DNAm

HL survivors and their unaffected twins did not differ with respect to array-wide mean DNAm when considered together or stratified by sex, age at diagnosis, age at sample collection, or follow-up time (Supplementary Table 1). Overall, beta DNAm levels were about 4% higher in the DNA from blood compared to saliva specimens.

No CpG loci showed significantly differences in DNAm between AYAHL survivors and their unaffected co-twins at a FDR of 5%. Thus, we reported CpG loci with a mean DNAm beta value differences ≥ 0.05 and P <0.05 (N = 74 and 6 loci among twin pairs providing blood and saliva samples, respectively) (Table 2). Among twin pairs with blood samples, AYAHL survivors had higher mean beta values than their unaffected co-twins for 41/74 loci while unaffected co-twins demonstrated higher average beta values than case twins for 33 loci. Several differentially methylated loci in DNA occurred in genes directly or indirectly related to HL, including TAP1, TLR9, IFNG, RUNX3and all but the TLR9 locus were hypomethylated in survivors compared to unaffected twin controls.

Table 2.

Individual loci1 with significant within pair blood or saliva DNAm difference.

Loci Mean beta difference (Case – Co-twin) P-value Gene ID2 Gene Symbol Located in CpG Island
Twin pairs with blood sample
 cg25298754 −0.058 0.001 79413 ZBED2 no
 cg13500819 −0.078 0.001 51237 MGC29506 no
 cg23667432 −0.063 0.001 250 ALPP yes
 cg00168942 −0.055 0.002 219770 GJD4 no
 cg02196805 −0.056 0.002 1437 CSF2 no
 cg03112433 −0.089 0.003 5218 CDK14 no
 cg16529592 −0.070 0.003 864 RUNX3 no
 cg18087514 −0.113 0.004 8564 KMO no
 cg20289911 −0.054 0.004 83541 FAM110A no
 cg19421752 −0.055 0.004 348932 SLC6A18 yes
 cg03954858 −0.053 0.005 113828 FAM83F no
 cg05824215 −0.070 0.005 1235 CCR6 no
 cg12387247 −0.061 0.005 2208 FCER2 no
 cg20099806 −0.062 0.005 57003 CCDC47 no
 cg07618900 −0.062 0.008 144453 BEST3 no
 cg26227465 −0.056 0.011 3458 IFNG no
 cg09588653 −0.066 0.012 6534 SLC6A7 no
 cg07826255 −0.054 0.012 6442 SGCA no
 cg22062068 −0.062 0.017 27288 RBMXL2 yes
 cg20587168 −0.051 0.017 284382 ACTL9 yes
 cg07330329 −0.064 0.023 79097 TRIM48 no
 cg01281904 −0.067 0.023 4986 OPRK1 yes
 cg24202119 −0.059 0.024 133690 CAPSL no
 cg22586527 −0.073 0.024 55553 SOX6 no
 cg02735486 −0.083 0.026 287 ANK2 yes
 cg18829411 −0.058 0.029 3150 HMGN1 yes
 cg04180953 −0.056 0.029 1823 DSC1 no
 cg16853860 −0.067 0.032 6890 TAP1 no
 cg23228178 −0.060 0.033 23569 PADI4 no
 cg07637239 −0.053 0.034 338567 KCNK18 no
 cg26251865 −0.057 0.037 56269 IRGC no
 cg19850370 −0.051 0.038 8671 SLC4A4 no
 cg02334775 −0.052 0.042 3669 ISG20 yes
 cg06244417 0.054 0.003 2219 FCN1 no
 cg03883348 0.053 0.004 147700 KLC3 yes
 cg10978346 0.068 0.005 8821 INPP4B no
 cg16404106 0.054 0.006 60494 CCDC81 yes
 cg21578541 0.051 0.006 54106 TLR9 no
 cg09573795 0.069 0.006 4487 MSX1 yes
 cg18267381 0.050 0.011 79750 ZNF385D yes
 cg22752533 0.061 0.012 57468 SLC12A5 yes
 cg21750887 0.061 0.013 57094 CPA6 no
 cg22285621 0.074 0.014 54961 SSH3 yes
 cg27553955 0.053 0.014 170850 KCNG3 yes
 cg08349806 0.056 0.014 255027 MPV17L yes
 cg12799895 0.061 0.015 4885 NPTX2 yes
 cg10019507 0.050 0.016 6754 SSTR4 yes
 cg18934187 0.105 0.016 147323 STARD6 no
 cg15309006 0.053 0.017 63928 CHP2 yes
 cg06958829 0.051 0.018 1101 CHAD yes
 cg20483374 0.053 0.020 114902 C1QTNF5 yes
 cg12324629 0.072 0.020 9706 ULK2 yes
 cg15379633 0.088 0.021 9609 RAB36 yes
 cg24777950 0.066 0.022 1511 CTSG no
 cg18640030 0.060 0.024 1392 CRH no
 cg08015496 0.062 0.024 1314 COPA no
 cg12594641 0.072 0.025 130574 LYPD6 yes
 cg26556719 0.062 0.028 56136 PCDHA13 yes
 cg24120841 0.088 0.028 7068 THRB yes
 cg14914852 0.057 0.030 124626 ZPBP2 yes
 cg01615704 0.060 0.030 7851 MALL yes
 cg24474182 0.078 0.030 53829 P2RY13 no
 cg15250507 0.068 0.032 55765 C1orf106 yes
 cg12164282 0.088 0.034 7837 PXDN yes
 cg12163490 0.053 0.036 1009 CDH11 yes
 cg12006284 0.052 0.041 7490 WT1 yes
 cg12788313 0.060 0.046 4485 MST1 no
 cg02240622 0.056 0.046 5330 PLCB2 no
 cg25044651 0.061 0.047 206338 LVRN yes
 cg03958979 0.053 0.047 7101 NR2E1 yes
 cg14576824 0.059 0.047 26750 RPS6KC1 yes
 cg23606023 0.069 0.047 863 CBFA2T3 no
 cg14603345 0.099 0.049 22903 BTBD3 yes
 cg03665457 0.101 0.049 158160 HSD17B7P2 yes
Twin pairs with saliva sample
 cg19096475 0.078 0.0003 79827 ASAM yes
 cg06398181 0.053 0.0003 7776 ZNF236 no
 cg15811427 0.058 0.001 2357 FPR1 no
 cg12461141 −0.058 0.005 10346 TRIM22 no
 cg19319069 −0.060 0.025 7328 UBE2H yes
cg20169062 −0.070 0.046 8988 HSPB3 no
1

Only individual loci with mean intra-pair beta value differences >= 0.05 and paired t-test P < 0.05 were presented.

Among twin pairs with saliva samples, survivors had higher mean beta values than their unaffected co-twins for 3/6 the loci.

DNAm age

HL survivors had older mean blood DNAm age than their unaffected co-twins (+2.8 years, P = 0.04) (Table 3). The age differential persisted when stratified by sex, however, it was only statistically significant among female pairs (females: +2.7 years, P = 0.01; males +2.8 years, P = 0.26). There was a borderline significant difference between HL survivors and their unaffected co-twins among pairs who were older than the median age at sample collection (+2.4 years, P = 0.09). There were no significant differences among the pairs who provided saliva samples, although in each stratum, the AYHL survivor had slightly higher DNAm age compared to their unaffected twin. When mean differences in DNAm age were compared to actual age, the difference was larger in pairs who provided a blood sample (HL survivor + 6.6 years; unaffected twins + 3.9 years), compared to pairs who provided a saliva sample (HL survivor + 3.3 years; unaffected twins + 2.5 years) (Supplementary Figure 1 a and b).

Table 3.

DNAm age in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors and their unaffected co-twins.

Mean DNAm Age (SD)
Blood (N=9 pairs) Saliva (N=36 pairs)


(N = no of pairs) HL Survivors Unaffected co-twin P (N = no. of pairs) HL Survivors Unaffected co-twin P
All pairs 64.1 (9.2) 61.3 (8.1) 0.04 All pairs 53.3 (9.5) 52.6 (9.9) 0.39
Sex Sex
 Females (N = 4) 63.7 (11.9) 61.0 (11.2) 0.01  Females (N = 20) 52.7 (11.1) 52.0 (10.7) 0.52
 Males (N = 5) 64.4 (8.0) 61.6 (6.0) 0.26  Males (N = 16) 54.0 (7.3) 53.3 (9.1) 0.58
Histology Histology
 Nodular Sclerosis (N = 6) 60.6 (9.6) 58.6 (8.5) 0.10  Nodular Sclerosis (N = 18) 54.2 (8.8) 53.5 (10.0) 0.52
 Other (N = 3) 71.0 (1.3) 66.8 (4.1) 0.30  Other (N = 18) 52.3 (10.3) 51.7 (10.0) 0.57
Age at sample collection1 Age at sample collection2
 < Median (N = 4) 59.6 (9.3) 56.4 (6.0) 0.27  < Median (N = 18) 46.6 (7.5) 45.4 (6.4) 0.23
 ≥ Median (N = 5) 67.7 (8.3) 65.3 (7.7) 0.09  ≥ Median (N = 18) 59.9 (6.0) 59.7 (7.2) 0.88
By time since diagnosis3 By time since diagnosis4
 < median (N = 4) 62.6 (10.5) 58.3 (8.2) 0.11  < median (N = 18) 51.0 (10.8) 49.7 (10.8) 0.16
 ≥ median (N = 5) 65.2 (9.2) 63.7 (8.0) 0.31  ≥ median (N = 18) 55.5 (7.7) 55.5 (8.1) 0.98
1

Median age at sample collection among twin pairs with blood sample: 54 y

2

Median age at sample collection among twin pairs with saliva sample: 47.5 y

3

Median years since diagnosis among twin pairs with blood sample: 34 y

4

Median years since diagnosis among twin pairs with saliva sample: 24.5 y

We then assessed the proportion of lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes in HL survivors and unaffected co-twins in blood and saliva samples using Houseman’s algorithm as described above (Supplementary Table 2). Among AYAHL survivors, blood samples had a higher average proportion of lymphocytes and a lower proportion of granulocytes (32.5% lymphocytes and 60.5% granulocytes) compared to saliva samples (17.8% lymphocytes and 73.7% granulocytes), with borderline significant differences.

Discussion

We examined DNAm in long-term AYAHL survivors and used unaffected twins of cancer survivors as genetically and early life-matched controls. We observed an epigenetic age acceleration in AYAHL survivors compared to their unaffected co-twins in every stratum, (sex, age at and time since diagnosis, histological subtype), limited to DNA from blood specimens. Other studies have reported associations between DNAm age and risk of overall cancer risk [39], B-cell lymphoma [40] and lung cancer among women and cancer mortality in later life [41], even after adjusting for known risk factors. Older tumor tissue DNAm age (older than patient age) was observed in various tumor types (e.g. bladder, bone marrow and ovary) [23]. A recent study found that chemotherapy can induce blood DNAm alterations among ovarian cancer patients associated with overall survival [42].

It is clear that survivors of AYA cancer experience an increased risk of serious health conditions associated with aging, including cardiovascular disease, pulmonary fibrosis, gastrointestinal reflux, and second malignancy, with a prevalence of 66%−88% [43], and that they have a life expectancy significantly lower than that of the general population [44]. It is possible that altered DNAm as a result of therapy may contribute to the late health outcomes. In our study, it is notable that the difference in DNAm age in the AYAHL-discordant twin pairs persisted for decades after cure. There are reports that exposure to Vinca alkaloids (i.e. vincristine), alkylation agents (i.e. dacarbazine), bleomycin and radiation, all part of standard AYAHL therapy, may be associated with epigenetic aging [45]. Thus, the most likely explanation for the difference in DNAm age between survivors and their twins is that it is a result of treatment, given that at least 3 of the 4 agents in standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy result in epigenetic modification[46]. Although we did not have detailed treatment information for each patient, the patients were mainly stage I or IIA, with a handful with IIIA, and during the diagnostic period (1961–2004), treatment with radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy was standard for early stage disease [47]. Alternative explanations are that the accelerated epigenetic age is a result of the disease, or an acquired risk factor prior to diagnosis.

In studies of cancer-free individuals, males showed a higher acceleration in epigenetic age in blood compared to females [48]. Our study was too small to assess whether there were gender-specific differences in accelerated aging in AYAHL survivors, although in the pairs that provided blood, there was a suggestion of a stronger effect among females.

There was no difference in array-wide mean DNAm between survivors and matched unaffected co-twins. However, we did find a large number of specific loci that were differentially methylated, largely limited to the nine pairs who provided DNA from blood specimens, (although statistical significance did not survive adjustment for multiple comparisons). We identified 74 and 6 loci with a mean beta value difference of at least 0.05 and P <0.05 among twin pairs with blood and saliva samples, respectively. Three loci (TLR9, TAP1 and IFNG) have been implicated in HL risk in candidate genetic association studies. A TAP1 genetic variant (allele encoding amino acid Ile at residue 333) was associated with familial NS AYAHL in a case-parent trio study [49]. A SNP in TLR9 [50], a gene encoding the toll-like receptor 9 molecule that recognizes unmethylated CpG dinucleotides in bacterial DNA and is important for initiating an innate immune response, has been associated with HL risk in a case-control study conducted in Greece. A SNP in IFNG [51] was associated with susceptibility to HL in a British case-control study. IFNG encodes the Th1 cytokine interferon-γ, an important initiator of the cytotoxic T-cell response, which is often suppressed at diagnosis in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients [52]. Another locus with significantly differential DNAm was RUNX3, which is produced by EBV incorporated into the host genome, and has an important role in EBV-driven B-cell maturation [53]. Because about 30% of AYA HL tumors contain EBV in the nucleus of the tumor cells, RUNX3 could have potential significance for this lymphoma.

The positive results in this study were limited to the DNA obtained from blood samples, with no significant differences in DNA methylation measured from saliva. We found a higher proportion of lymphocytes in blood compared to saliva samples. Because the cell of origin of HL is a post-germinal center B-lymphocyte, it is possible that blood samples better reflect DNAm changes in this setting.

The major advantage of our study is the matched case-control study design of disease-discordant MZ twins, which has several benefits over a standard case-control study. DNAm can be influenced by genetic variation [21, 22]. Moreover, a recent paper suggested that identical epigenetic regions in MZ twins may be due to epigenetic changes acquired prior to embryo cleavage [54], and that these regions can be associated with an increased risk of developing certain cancers. Indeed, epigenetic alterations, including DNAm, are known to interact with somatic mutations during cancer development and progression [55]. Thus, use of an unaffected twin control can control for genetic, and possibly some epigenetic, factors in the assessment of the effect of disease or treatment on DNAm. In addition, the twin-pair design also controls for a variety of potential confounders, particularly for AYAHL late effects, such as early life social (e.g. SES) and/or environmental factors (e.g. microbial exposures). These early life experience may predict blood DNAm of inflammatory genes in young adulthood [56].

One major limitation is that the sample size in this study is small, particularly for participants with blood samples, which limited our ability to correlate DNAm differences with self-reported late outcomes. Because AYAHL is particularly rare (average annual incidence in the U.S. ~2–4/100,000), and MZ twins are uncommon, it is difficult to accumulate large numbers of AYAHL-discordant MZ twins. Another limitation was that we did not separate WBCs into subsets although it is known that DNAm can show substantial variations across different leukocyte lineages [36]. However, using bioinformatics, we were able to determine that the average proportions of lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes between the two sample types differed.

In conclusion, we observed a higher epigenetic age in long-term AYAHL survivors compared to their unaffected co-twins that persisted long after cure. Suggestive within-pair DNAm differences in several loci in HL-related genes were observed. The positive results were restricted to DNA collected from blood samples suggesting that blood specimens may be a more appropriate source for measuring DNAm among HL survivors. Future studies with larger sample sizes and with blood cell-type specific DNAm profiling are important in understanding the role of DNAm in AYAHL survivorship.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Environmental Health Science (1R01ESO15150-01 to TMM) and from the National Cancer Institute (1R03CA110836 to WC), the Leukemia Lymphoma Society (TRL-6137-07 to WC), the Department of Defense Peer-Reviewed Medical Research Program (PR054600 to WC), and the American Society of Hematology Bridge Grant Program (to WC). We would like to thank the participants and staff of the International Twin Registry at University of Southern California for their valuable contributions. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, W.C., upon reasonable request.

Footnotes

Disclosure of interest: Daniel J. Weisenberger is a consultant for Zymo Research Corporation.

References

  • 1.Correa P, O’Conor GT. Epidemiologic patterns of Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Cancer. 1971. September 15;8(2):192–201. PubMed PMID: 5133848; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mueller N, Grufferman S. Hodgkin Lymphopma In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni J Jr., editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Third Edition ed. NYC, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 872–898. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mack TM, Cozen W, Shibata DK, et al. Concordance for Hodgkin’s disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the young-adult form of the disease. The New England journal of medicine. 1995. February 16;332(7):413–8. doi: 10.1056/nejm199502163320701. PubMed PMID: 7824015; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cozen W, Timofeeva MN, Li D, et al. A meta-analysis of Hodgkin lymphoma reveals 19p13.3 TCF3 as a novel susceptibility locus. Nature communications. 2014. June 12;5:3856. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4856. PubMed PMID: 24920014; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4055950. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khankhanian P, Cozen W, Himmelstein DS, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies reveals genetic overlap between Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple sclerosis. Int J Epidemiol. 2016. June;45(3):728–40. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv364. PubMed PMID: 26971321; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5005944. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clarke CA, Glaser SL, Keegan TH, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and Hodgkin’s lymphoma incidence in California. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2005. June;14(6):1441–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0567. PubMed PMID: 15941953; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cozen W, Hamilton AS, Zhao P, et al. A protective role for early oral exposures in the etiology of young adult Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2009. November 5;114(19):4014–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209601. PubMed PMID: 19738032; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2774542. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hjalgrim H, Askling J, Rostgaard K, et al. Characteristics of Hodgkin’s lymphoma after infectious mononucleosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2003. October 2;349(14):1324–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023141. PubMed PMID: 14523140; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cozen W, Gill PS, Ingles SA, et al. IL-6 levels and genotype are associated with risk of young adult Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2004. April 15;103(8):3216–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2860. PubMed PMID: 15070705; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cozen W, Gill PS, Salam MT, et al. Interleukin-2, interleukin-12, and interferon-gamma levels and risk of young adult Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2008. April 1;111(7):3377–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-106872. PubMed PMID: 18077789; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2275007. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castellino SM, Geiger AM, Mertens AC, et al. Morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood. 2011. February 10;117(6):1806–16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278796. PubMed PMID: 21037086; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3056636. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, et al. Second cancer risk after chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a collaborative British cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2011. November 1;29(31):4096–104. doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.34.8268. PubMed PMID: 21969511; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hanly P, Soerjomataram I, Sharp L. Measuring the societal burden of cancer: the cost of lost productivity due to premature cancer-related mortality in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2015. February 15;136(4):E136–45. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29105. PubMed PMID: 25066804; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fisher RI, DeVita VT Jr., Bostick F, et al. Persistent immunologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of advanced Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Intern Med. 1980. May;92(5):595–9. PubMed PMID: 6992672; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ng AK, Li S, Recklitis C, et al. A comparison between long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease and their siblings on fatigue level and factors predicting for increased fatigue. Ann Oncol. 2005. December;16(12):1949–55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi407. PubMed PMID: 16227316; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Punnett A, Tsang RW, Hodgson DC. Hodgkin lymphoma across the age spectrum: epidemiology, therapy, and late effects. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2010. January;20(1):30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2009.09.006. PubMed PMID: 19959029; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collado-Hidalgo A, Bower JE, Ganz PA, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006. May 1;12(9):2759–66. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2398. PubMed PMID: 16675568; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ganz PA, Bower JE. Cancer related fatigue: a focus on breast cancer and Hodgkin’s disease survivors. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2007;46(4):474–9. doi: 10.1080/02841860701367845. PubMed PMID: 17497314; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kurzrock R. The role of cytokines in cancer-related fatigue. Cancer. 2001. September 15;92(6 Suppl):1684–8. PubMed PMID: 11598887; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nature reviews Genetics. 2005. August;6(8):597–610. doi: 10.1038/nrg1655. PubMed PMID: 16136652; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bell JT, Spector TD. DNA methylation studies using twins: what are they telling us? Genome biology. 2012. October 18;13(10):172. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-172. PubMed PMID: 23078798; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3491399. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grundberg E, Meduri E, Sandling JK, et al. Global analysis of DNA methylation variation in adipose tissue from twins reveals links to disease-associated variants in distal regulatory elements. American journal of human genetics. 2013. November 7;93(5):876–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.004. PubMed PMID: 24183450; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3824131. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome biology. 2013;14(10):R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. PubMed PMID: 24138928; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4015143. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marioni RE, Shah S, McRae AF, et al. DNA methylation age of blood predicts all-cause mortality in later life. Genome biology. 2015. January 30;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0584-6. PubMed PMID: 25633388; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4350614. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen BH, Marioni RE, Colicino E, et al. DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: meta-analysis predicting time to death. Aging. 2016. September 28;8(9):1844–1865. doi: 10.18632/aging.101020. PubMed PMID: 27690265; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5076441. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marioni RE, Shah S, McRae AF, et al. The epigenetic clock is correlated with physical and cognitive fitness in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Int J Epidemiol. 2015. August;44(4):1388–96. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu277. PubMed PMID: 25617346; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4588858. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ambatipudi S, Cuenin C, Hernandez-Vargas H, et al. Tobacco smoking-associated genome-wide DNA methylation changes in the EPIC study. Epigenomics. 2016. May;8(5):599–618. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0001. PubMed PMID: 26864933; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hou L, Zhang X, Wang D, et al. Environmental chemical exposures and human epigenetics. Int J Epidemiol. 2012. February;41(1):79–105. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr154. PubMed PMID: 22253299; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3304523. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nyce J. Drug-induced DNA hypermethylation and drug resistance in human tumors. Cancer research. 1989. November 1;49(21):5829–36. PubMed PMID: 2790794; eng. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dhiab MB, Ziadi S, Mestiri S, et al. DNA methylation patterns in EBV-positive and EBV-negative Hodgkin lymphomas. Cellular oncology (Dordrecht). 2015. December;38(6):453–62. doi: 10.1007/s13402-015-0242-8. PubMed PMID: 26350502; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ushmorov A, Leithauser F, Sakk O, et al. Epigenetic processes play a major role in B-cell-specific gene silencing in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2006. March 15;107(6):2493–500. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3765. PubMed PMID: 16304050; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ammerpohl O, Haake A, Pellissery S, et al. Array-based DNA methylation analysis in classical Hodgkin lymphoma reveals new insights into the mechanisms underlying silencing of B cell-specific genes. Leukemia. 2012. January;26(1):185–8. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.194. PubMed PMID: 21818115; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cozen W, Yu G, Gail MH, et al. Fecal microbiota diversity in survivors of adolescent/young adult Hodgkin lymphoma: a study of twins. British journal of cancer. 2013. March 19;108(5):1163–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.60. PubMed PMID: 23443674; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3619077. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mack TM, Deapen D, Hamilton AS. Representativeness of a roster of volunteer North American twins with chronic disease. Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. 2000. March;3(1):33–42. PubMed PMID: 10808239; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cozen W, Hwang AE, Cockburn MG, et al. The USC Adult Twin Cohorts: International Twin Study and California Twin Program. Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. 2013. February;16(1):366–70. doi: 10.1017/thg.2012.134. PubMed PMID: 23218448; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ji H, Ehrlich LI, Seita J, et al. Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors. Nature. 2010. September 16;467(7313):338–42. doi: 10.1038/nature09367. PubMed PMID: 20720541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2956609. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC bioinformatics. 2012. May 8;13:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86. PubMed PMID: 22568884; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3532182. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–230. eng. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zheng Y, Joyce BT, Colicino E, et al. Blood Epigenetic Age may Predict Cancer Incidence and Mortality. EBioMedicine. 2016. March;5:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.008. PubMed PMID: 27077113; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4816845. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dugue PA, Bassett JK, Joo JE, et al. DNA methylation-based biological aging and cancer risk and survival: Pooled analysis of seven prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 2017. December 2. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31189. PubMed PMID: 29197076; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Perna L, Zhang Y, Mons U, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration predicts cancer, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality in a German case cohort. Clinical epigenetics. 2016;8:64. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0228-z. PubMed PMID: 27274774; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4891876. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Flanagan JM, Wilson A, Koo C, et al. Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Induces Methylation Changes in Blood DNA Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017. May 1;23(9):2213–2222. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1754. PubMed PMID: 27663594; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Phillips SM, Padgett LS, Leisenring WM, et al. Survivors of childhood cancer in the United States: prevalence and burden of morbidity. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2015. April;24(4):653–63. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1418. PubMed PMID: 25834148; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4418452. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mohty B, Mohty M. Long-term complications and side effects after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an update. Blood cancer journal. 2011. April;1(4):e16. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2011.14. PubMed PMID: 22829137; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3255242. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nyce JW. Drug-induced DNA hypermethylation: a potential mediator of acquired drug resistance during cancer chemotherapy. Mutation research. 1997. April;386(2):153–61. PubMed PMID: 9113116; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cupit-Link MC, Kirkland JL, Ness KK, et al. Biology of premature ageing in survivors of cancer. ESMO open. 2017;2(5):e000250. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000250. PubMed PMID: 29326844; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5757468. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.DeVita VT Jr., A selective history of the therapy of Hodgkin’s disease. British journal of haematology. 2003. September;122(5):718–27. PubMed PMID: 12930382; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Horvath S, Gurven M, Levine ME, et al. An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease. Genome biology. 2016. August 11;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0. PubMed PMID: 27511193; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4980791. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Harty LC, Lin AY, Goldstein AM, et al. HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and TAP genes in familial Hodgkin disease. Blood. 2002. January 15;99(2):690–3. PubMed PMID: 11781255; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mollaki V, Georgiadis T, Tassidou A, et al. Polymorphisms and haplotypes in TLR9 and MYD88 are associated with the development of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a candidate-gene association study. Journal of human genetics. 2009. November;54(11):655–9. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2009.90. PubMed PMID: 19745833; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Butterbach K, Beckmann L, de Sanjose S, et al. Association of JAK-STAT pathway related genes with lymphoma risk: results of a European case-control study (EpiLymph). British journal of haematology. 2011. May;153(3):318–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08632.x. PubMed PMID: 21418178; eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hjalgrim H, Rostgaard K, Johnson PC, et al. HLA-A alleles and infectious mononucleosis suggest a critical role for cytotoxic T-cell response in EBV-related Hodgkin lymphoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010. April 6;107(14):6400–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915054107. PubMed PMID: 20308568; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2851961. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brady G, Whiteman HJ, Spender LC, et al. Downregulation of RUNX1 by RUNX3 requires the RUNX3 VWRPY sequence and is essential for Epstein-Barr virus-driven B-cell proliferation. Journal of virology. 2009. July;83(13):6909–16. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00216-09. PubMed PMID: 19403666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2698531. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Van Baak TE, Coarfa C, Dugue PA, et al. Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs. Genome biology. 2018. January 9;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1374-0. PubMed PMID: 29310692; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5759268. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010. January;31(1):27–36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. PubMed PMID: 19752007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2802667. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McDade TW, Ryan C, Jones MJ, et al. Social and physical environments early in development predict DNA methylation of inflammatory genes in young adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017. July 18;114(29):7611–7616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620661114. PubMed PMID: 28673994; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5530653. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp1

RESOURCES