Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 Jan 4;12:79. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20349-z

Interface-induced sign reversal of the anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulator heterostructures

Fei Wang 1,2,3,#, Xuepeng Wang 4,#, Yi-Fan Zhao 1,#, Di Xiao 1, Ling-Jie Zhou 1, Wei Liu 2, Zhidong Zhang 2, Weiwei Zhao 3, Moses H W Chan 1, Nitin Samarth 1, Chaoxing Liu 1, Haijun Zhang 4,, Cui-Zu Chang 1,
PMCID: PMC7782489  PMID: 33397964

Abstract

The Berry phase picture provides important insights into the electronic properties of condensed matter systems. The intrinsic anomalous Hall (AH) effect can be understood as the consequence of non-zero Berry curvature in momentum space. Here, we fabricate TI/magnetic TI heterostructures and find that the sign of the AH effect in the magnetic TI layer can be changed from being positive to negative with increasing the thickness of the top TI layer. Our first-principles calculations show that the built-in electric fields at the TI/magnetic TI interface influence the band structure of the magnetic TI layer, and thus lead to a reconstruction of the Berry curvature in the heterostructure samples. Based on the interface-induced AH effect with a negative sign in TI/V-doped TI bilayer structures, we create an artificial “topological Hall effect”-like feature in the Hall trace of the V-doped TI/TI/Cr-doped TI sandwich heterostructures. Our study provides a new route to create the Berry curvature change in magnetic topological materials that may lead to potential technological applications.

Subject terms: Ferromagnetism; Magnetic properties and materials; Surfaces, interfaces and thin films; Topological insulators


Berry curvature connects to exotic electronic phases hence it provides important insights to understand quantum materials. Here, the authors report sign change of the anomalous Hall effect resulted from Berry curvature change at the interface of a topological insulator/magnetic topological insulator heterostructure.

Introduction

The Berry phase is a quantum geometrical phase that has provided deep insights into the topological electronic properties of quantum materials14. Since the Berry phase encodes the adiabatic evolution of occupied eigen wave functions around the Fermi surface in the first Brillouin zone (BZ) of momentum space4,5, it is also important for understanding certain physical phenomena of quantum materials such as the intrinsic anomalous Hall (AH) effect6. In the 1950s, Karplus and Luttinger7 first proposed the idea that an AH effect of intrinsic origin can arise from the properties of the electronic band structure of a material. This connection was reformulated in the language of the Berry phase in the early 2000s6,810. The Berry curvature Ω(k) of the occupied Bloch bands is equivalent to an effective magnetic field in momentum space; this can affect the motion of electrons and gives rise to the AH effect in ferromagnetic (FM) materials6. Therefore, the Hall conductance (σxy) of the intrinsic AH effect in a two-dimensional (2D) FM material can be, in essence, calculated from the Fermi-sea integration of the Berry curvature Ω in its first BZ:

σxy=e22πhBZΩ(k)d2k, 1

where e is the elementary charge, h is the Planck constant, and k is the momentum wavevector. Because the integration of Berry curvature Ω for occupied Bloch bands in the first BZ of a 2D FM insulator equals its Chern number C multiple of 2π, i.e. BZΩ(k)d2k=2πC, σxy is therefore quantized as the following equation:

σxy=e2hC. 2

The experimental realization of the quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) effect in Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 film, confirming Eq. (2) with C = 1, also establishes convincingly that the intrinsic mechanism is solely responsible for the AH effect in magnetic TIs at least when the chemical potential of the sample is tuned near or located in the magnetic exchange gap1118. However, when the chemical potential of magnetic TI is tuned away from the magnetic exchange gap and crosses the bulk bands, it is not clear whether the intrinsic AH effect in magnetic TI is still dominant.

The origin of the AH effect in the metallic regime can be studied by exploring the scaling relationship between the AH resistance (ρyx) and the longitudinal resistance (ρxx). A quadratic dependence (i.e. ρyxρxx2) usually indicates that the AH effect is induced by scattering independent mechanisms, i.e. either intrinsic6 or extrinsic side-jump19, while a linear dependence (i.e. ρyx ∝ ρxx) can only be a result of extrinsic skew scattering20,21. It has been theoretically proposed8 and experimentally demonstrated22,23 that the AH effect in metallic diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs) (e.g. Mn-doped GaAs) is dominated by intrinsic mechanisms invoking the Berry phase6. Since the magnetically doped TI is in principle also a class of DMSs, it is expected that the intrinsic AH contribution is still dominant when the bulk channels are introduced in the magnetic TI. Provided the intrinsic AH contribution is still dominant, it is not clear whether the AH effect and the corresponding Berry curvature Ω in metallic magnetic TIs can be altered.

In this paper, we deposited TI films of different thicknesses on top of the magnetic TI film to form TI/magnetic TI bilayer heterostructures and systematically carried out Hall measurements under different temperatures (T) and different gate voltage (Vg). We observed a quadratic dependence between ρyx and ρxx (i.e ρyxρxx2) in the metallic regime of the magnetic TI samples, demonstrating the scattering independent origin of the AH effect. By tuning the TI thickness and/or the electric gate voltages, the magnitude and the sign of the AH effect for the magnetic TI heterostructures can be changed. We carried out first-principles calculations and attributed this AH effect change to the interface-induced Berry curvature reconstruction, which occurs due to the band structure modulation of the magnetic TI layers induced by built-in electric fields. We then fabricated the magnetic TI/TI/magnetic TI sandwich heterostructures with different dopants and were at first surprised to find a topological Hall (TH) effect-like behavior in the Hall traces. However, our careful analysis of the data shows that this apparent “TH effect” is not a result of the formation of chiral spin textures in the samples but due to the superposition of two AH effects with opposite signs. The interface-induced AH change realized in magnetic TI heterostructures opens a new avenue for systematic studies of the intrinsic AH effect of magnetic topological materials.

Results

Samples structures and intrinsic AH effect in metallic magnetic TI films

The samples used in this work are m quintuple layers (QL) Sb2Te3 with m = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on top of 5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayers and 5 QL Cr-doped Sb2Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 sandwiches. All samples were grown on 0.5-mm-thick heat-treated SrTiO3 (111) substrates in molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) chambers. Electrical transport measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) (2 K/9 T) with the magnetic field applied perpendicular to the film plane. The excitation current used in our measurements is 1 μA. Six-terminal Hall bars with a bottom-gate electrode were used for electrical transport studies. The Hall transport results shown here were anti-symmetrized as a function of the magnetic field and the ordinary Hall effect contributions were subtracted.

We first examined the relationship between the intrinsic AH effect and the integration of Berry curvature Ω of all the occupied Bloch bands in FM materials. As shown in Eq. (1), in the metallic regime of the 2D ferromagnets, the non-quantized Hall conductance σxy can be calculated by integrating the Berry curvature Ω in the first BZ (∫Ω) but with an opposite sign3. When an external magnetic field B is applied perpendicular to the sample, the spontaneously ordered magnetic moments deflects the motion of electrons and the AH effect emerges (Fig. 1a, b). When the internal magnetization M points upward, the mobile electrons move to the high potential side for ∫Ω < 0, so σxy > 0 (Fig. 1a) and the intrinsic AH hysteresis exhibits a positive sign (Fig. 1c). If ∫Ω > 0 in the FM materials, the mobile electrons will move to the lower potential side under positive internal magnetization M, so σxy < 0 (Fig. 1b) and the sign of the intrinsic AH effect becomes negative (Fig. 1d). Therefore, the intrinsic AH effect can be used as an electrical transport probe to detect the Berry curvature Ω of the FM materials.

Fig. 1. Intrinsic anomalous Hall (AH) effect and Berry curvature Ω.

Fig. 1

a, b The intrinsic AH effect formed in the ferromagnetic materials with positive (a) and negative (b) Berry curvature Ω integration of the occupied Bloch bands when the internal magnetization points upward. I is the applied excitation current. ⊕ and Ɵ are hole and electron carriers, respectively. Blue and red colors indicate high and low electrical potentials. c, d The corresponding AH hysteresis in the ferromagnetic materials with positive (c) and negative (d) Berry curvature Ω integration of the occupied bands. The sign and value of the AH effect are determined by the sign and magnitude of Berry curvature Ω integration of occupied bands. The arrows indicate the magnetic field sweep directions. The color bar is for ad. e The plot of the AH resistance at zero magnetic field ρyx(0) as a function of the longitudinal resistance at zero magnetic field ρxx(0) on a log–log scale for three 5 QL Sb2−xVxTe3 samples (x = 0.10, 0.16, and 0.20). The dashed lines are the fits using ρyxρxxα, α = 1.84 ± 0.02, 1.94 ± 0.01, and 1.91 ± 0.02 for x = 0.10, 0.16, and 0.20 samples, respectively.

In order to demonstrate the dominance of the intrinsic AH effect in the metallic regime of magnetically doped TI films, we studied the dependence between ρyx and ρxx in a series of 5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 (Sb2−xVxTe3) samples with different V concentration x (x ≥ 0.10). Figure 1e shows the ρyx under zero magnetic field (labeled as ρyx(0)) versus ρxx under zero magnetic field (labeled as ρxx(0)) curve plotted on a log–log scale in the low-temperature regions (more transport results are shown in Supplementary Note 2). This curve is linearly fitted and gives the scaling exponent α in the formula ρyx(0)ρxxα(0). We found α ~ 1.84 ± 0.02, 1.94 ± 0.01, and 1.91 ± 0.02 for x = 0.10, 0.16, and 0.20 samples, respectively. Since the α values are all very close to 2, we conclude the scattering independent (i.e. the intrinsic and/or extrinsic side-jump) mechanisms are primarily responsible for the AH effect in the metallic magnetic TI films6. However, since the TI materials have strongly spin–orbit coupled bands1,2, the intrinsic contribution is expected to be dominant6, similar to the AH effect in the well-studied magnetic Heusler and half-Heusler metals2426. We will next focus on altering this intrinsic AH effect by adding additional undoped TI layer(s) on top of magnetic TI layers.

Interface-induced AH change in TI/magnetic TI bilayers

Figure 2a–f shows the AH hysteresis loops of m QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer samples with 0 ≤ m ≤ 5. For the m = 0 and m = 1 samples, the sign of the AH hysteresis loops is positive (i.e. ρyx > 0 for M > 0). Under zero magnetic field, ρyx(0) are ~62 and ~7.5 Ω, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Both values are much lower than the quantized value (~25.8 kΩ), indicating that the chemical potential is crossing the bulk valence bands and the sample is located in the metallic regime12,27. When we increase the thickness (m ≥ 2) of the Sb2Te3 layer, the sign of the AH effect reverses and becomes negative (i.e. ρyx < 0 for M > 0). The absolute value of ρyx(0) increases from ~1.2 Ω for the m = 2 sample to ~10 Ω for the m = 4 sample (Fig. 2c–e). With further increase in the thickness m of the undoped TI layer, ρyx(0) decreases due to the introduction of more conduction from the thick undoped TI layer. For the m = 5 sample, the absolute value of ρyx(0) is ~0.5 Ω and the AH hysteresis loop becomes less squared (Fig. 2f).

Fig. 2. Interface-induced sign reversal of the AH effect in TI/magnetic TI heterostructures.

Fig. 2

ae Magnetic field (μ0H) dependence of the Hall resistance ρyx in m QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer heterostructures. m = 0 (a); m = 1 (b); m = 2 (c); m = 3 (d); m = 4 (e); m = 5 (f). The arrows indicate the magnetic field sweep directions. All measurements were taken at T = 2 K. The linear contribution from the ordinary Hall effect was subtracted. g Temperature dependence of the Hall resistance at zero magnetic field ρyx (0) in m QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer heterostructures.

We summarized the temperature dependence of ρyx(0) for these six samples in Fig. 2g. For the m = 0 sample, the temperature dependence of ρyx(0) is monotonic and ρyx(0) becomes 0 at T = 40 K, suggesting the Curie temperature (TC) of 5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 is ~40 K. This temperature dependence is typical in conventional DMS28 and magnetically doped TI samples29,30. For the m = 1 sample, ρyx(0) first increases and then decreases with temperature showing a maximum at T = 15 K. ρyx(0) vanishes at T = 40 K. For the m = 2 sample, as noted above, ρyx(0) < 0 at T = 2 K. With further increase in temperature, the magnitude of ρyx(0) decreases monotonically and becomes zero at T = 8 K. ρyx(0) of the m = 3 sample shows an unusual temperature dependence, specifically it changes its sign from being negative to positive near T = 11 K. In other words, this sample shows a linear Hall trace at T = 11 K. Note that the linear Hall trace observed here does not mean that the FM order is absent because the sample still shows a butterfly magnetoresistance curve (see Supplementary Note 4). Instead, ρyx(0) = 0 at T = 11 K indicates ∫Ω = 0 of the occupied Bloch bands in the 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer sample. For the m = 4 and m = 5 sample, ρyx(0) < 0 in the entire temperature range and its absolute value decreases monotonically with increasing temperature T. We note that the butterfly structure of ρxx in all samples disappears at T = 40 K (Supplementary Fig. 7), suggesting that TC of all these samples is ~40 K and the V atoms in the bottom V-doped TI layer do not diffuse into the top TI layer. We, therefore, concluded the magnitude and the sign changes in these bilayer heterostructures are results of the change in the integration of the Berry curvature ∫Ω. This will be discussed in more detail below based on the gate tuning of the sample.

Figure 3a–e shows the magnetic field (μ0H) dependence of ρyx under different gate voltage Vgs at T = 11 K for the m = 3 sample. As noted above, ρyx shows a linear behavior at Vg = 0 V (Fig. 3c). By applying a negative Vg to introduce hole carriers into the sample, the AH hysteresis with a positive sign appears, suggesting ∫Ω < 0 (Fig. 3a, b). When applying a positive Vg, the electron carriers are introduced, the AH hysteresis with a negative sign appears, suggesting ∫Ω > 0 (Fig. 3d, e). Therefore, the samples tend to show the AH effect with the positive (negative) sign when injecting the hole (electron) carriers. It is interesting to note that our observation here is opposite to that reported in (Bi,Sb)2Te3/Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3 bilayer samples31. Figure 3f shows the 2D color contour plot of ρyx(0) on the T and Vg plane, which is divided into two regions by a dashed line that extends to zero temperature. Positive ρyx(0) is favored at higher T and negative Vg with more hole carriers injected, while negative ρyx(0) is favored at lower T and positive Vg with more electron carriers injected. Therefore, both the magnitude and the sign of ρyx can also be changed by varying the gating voltage.

Fig. 3. Electric field control of the AH change in TI/magnetic TI bilayer heterostructures.

Fig. 3

ae μ0H dependence of ρyx in 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer heterostructure at different gates Vg. Vg = −200V (a); Vg = −100V (b); Vg = 0 V (c); Vg = +100 V (d); Vg = +200 V (e). The arrows indicate the magnetic field sweep directions. All measurements were taken at T = 11 K. The linear contribution from the ordinary Hall effect was subtracted. f 2D color contour plot of ρyx (0) as a function of both T and Vg in 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 bilayer heterostructure.

Theoretical analysis of the interface-induced AH change in TI/magnetic TI bilayers

The magnitude and the sign changes of ρyx induced by varying the thickness of the top undoped TI layer can be interpreted based on the Berry curvature distribution change in the bottom V-doped Sb2Te3 layer, modulated by the built-in electric fields at the interface between the Sb2Te3 and V-doped Sb2Te3 layers. Prior studies have demonstrated that the V dopants in Sb2Te3 can introduce more hole carriers12,32,33. In other words, the chemical potential of the V-doped Sb2Te3 layer compared to that of the Sb2Te3 layer is more deeply buried in the bulk valence bands (Fig. 4a). When an additional Sb2Te3 layer is deposited on top of the 5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 layer to form the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayer heterostructures, additional hole carriers in the V-doped Sb2Te3 layers can move to the Sb2Te3 layers and thus a built-in electric field is created at the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 interface. As a consequence, the chemical potentials of the Sb2Te3 and V-doped Sb2Te3 layers are pulled to the same level (Fig. 4a). The thicker undoped Sb2Te3 layer expects to accept more hole carriers from the V-doped Sb2Te3 layer and thus induce a larger built-in electric field at the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 interface.

Fig. 4. Schematic of the charge transfer between the TI and magnetic TI layers and calculated band structures and Berry curvature distribution of the magnetic TI films under various electric fields.

Fig. 4

a Schematic of the charge transfer through the interface between the Sb2Te3 and V-doped Sb2Te3 layers. The V-doped Sb2Te3 layer has more hole carries than the Sb2Te3 layer. A built-in electric field is generated at the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 interface. b, d, f, h The calculated band structures (left) and corresponding Hall conductance σxy (right) of 5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 films under electric field E = 0 V/Å (b), E = 0.0005 V/Å (d), E = 0.001 V/Å (f), and E = 0.0015 V/Å (h). c, e, g, i The calculated Berry curvature distribution of 5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 under electric field E = 0 V/Å (c), E = 0.0005 V/Å (e), E = 0.001 V/Å (g), and E = 0.0015 V/Å (i). The chemical potential positions are slightly shifted (−30 to 0 to 42 meV) to simulate the influence induced by the charge transfer and/or the gating effect in experiments.

To simulate the effect induced by the built-in electric field at the TI/magnetic TI interface, we carried out first-principles calculations on the electronic band structures and the corresponding AH conductance σxy of 5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 films with Structure II (i.e. two V atoms located at the third outermost Sb layers, see more details and calculated electronic band structures and the Berry curvature distributions for other three kinds of structures in Supplementary Note 8) under different electric fields (Fig. 4b–i). We see that there is no QAH effect regime for all cases. A trivial gap is formed between the bulk conduction and valence bands, where the Hall conductance σxy is zero. We speculate this gap is likely induced by the hybridization between the top and bottom surface states34. We note that the TI/magnetic TI bilayer structures are not suitable for the realization of the QAH effect because one surface state of the undoped TI layer is always not gapped. By adjusting the magnitude of E, we can simulate the observed intrinsic AH effect of the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayer heterostructures with different thicknesses of the undoped Sb2Te3 layers. The calculated AH conductance σxy can be either positive or negative with the chemical potential located at different energy levels (Fig. 4b, d, f, h). The Berry curvature distributions under different E were also calculated with the chemical potential located at different energy levels (i.e. +42, 0, and −30 meV) (Fig. 4c, e, g, i). These energy levels are chosen to be within the range of the Vg-induced chemical potential shift. Our calculations show that the band crossing and/or anti-crossing (by spin–orbit coupling) in the bulk bands can contribute a large Berry curvature, consistent with prior studies9,10. Once the chemical potential shifts away from the crossing and/or anti-crossing bands or the built-in electric field modulates the crossing and/or anti-crossing bands, the Berry curvature would have a significant change, which can correspondingly change the AH conductance σxy including both magnitude and sign.

For the 5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 films without the electric field (i.e. E = 0 V/Å), the spatial inversion is preserved, and the Berry curvature distribution shows an exact hexagonal pattern (Fig. 4c). We found that there is a narrow energy region with a positive AH conductance σxy near the Fermi level which originates from the large negative Berry curvature induced by the appearance of the band anti-crossing in the calculated electronic band structures (Fig. 4b)9,10. Once electric fields are introduced, the spatial inversion symmetry is broken and the Berry curvature distribution consequently loses the hexagonal pattern (Fig. 4e, g, i). We note that the electric field E can evidently tune the position of the band anti-crossing. For example, within the energy region of the positive AH conductance σxy, the gap of band anti-crossing along Γ−Κ′ first close and then reopen under the electric fields, which changes the Berry curvature from negative to positive. Larger electric fields (e.g. E = 0.001 V/Å and 0.0015 V/Å) tunes σxy from being positive to negative (Fig. 4f–i). Therefore, our first-principles calculations demonstrate that the built-in electric fields play a key role in the reconstruction of the Berry curvature and the magnitude and sign change of σxy in Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayer samples.

Next, we discuss whether the chemical potential of Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayer samples in experiments could locate into or near the AH sign reversal region of our first-principles calculations. We made the following rough estimation. From our Hall results, the carrier densities of the m = 0 to m = 5 samples at Vg = 0 V (Fig. 2) are 1.04, 3.54, 5.93, 1.67, 2.46, and 1.74 × 1013 cm−2, respectively. By combining with the calculated density of states of the 5 QL Sb1.9V0.1Te3 films under E = 0 V/Å, we estimated the positions of the chemical potential are ~0.07, ~ 0.13, ~0.19, ~0.09, ~0.11, and 0.09 eV below the top of bulk valence bands. We found that the estimated chemical potentials are slightly higher than the AH sign reversal regime induced by the built-in electric fields except for the m = 2 sample. We attributed this small difference to a reasonable error bar of the estimation. There are two kinds of approximations made in our first-principles calculations. The first approximation is that we do not take the top undoped Sb2Te3 layer into account in our simulation and we assume the carriers uniformly distributed in the undoped Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 heterostructure samples. However, the carrier concentrations in real bilayer samples are different in undoped Sb2Te3 and V-doped Sb2Te3 layers (Fig. 4a), as discussed above. The second approximation is to use the supercell model to simulate the V doping in our calculations, in which V doping atoms are assumed to distribute periodically, thus forming bands near the Fermi energy. A significant portion of bulk valence bands comes from the contribution of V atom d orbitals near the Fermi energy while V atoms in the real V-doped TI samples should be distributed completely randomly and the atomic orbitals from V atoms cannot form bands. This means that some hole carriers that occupied the V atom orbitals should be localized and cannot contribute to the transport measurements. Therefore, it is acceptable to consider that the chemical potential in real samples locates within or near the AH sign reversal region in our theoretical calculations. In our experiments, the m = 0 sample without the built-in electric field always shows a positive AH sign, which further supports our interpretation.

As noted above, the electron from the undoped TI to magnetic TI layers yields a built-in electric field at the interface. This built-in electric field moves the chemical potential of the magnetic TI layer upward and at the same time reconstructs the electronic band structure, as well as the corresponding Berry curvature distribution. We therefore conclude that the interface-induced AH effect change in TI/magnetic TI bilayer sample is indeed from the Berry curvature distribution change. For the m = 4 sample, the AH resistance reaches a maximum value (Fig. 2), so we roughly estimate the effective penetration length of the built-in electric field as 4 QL (i.e. 4 nm) in our TI/magnetic TI bilayer samples. In other words, any undoped TI layer greater than 4 QL will not further contribute to the formation of the built-in electric field, but the better conduction of the thick undoped TI layer will shunt the current going through the bottom magnetic TI layer and thus the AH effect will decrease and finally disappear. Note that some valence bands induced by random V dopants are localized and does not contribute the AH conductance σxy, which should be overestimated in our calculations. Moreover, the carriers in the real samples are inevitably scattered by the impurities and defects and thus have a finite relaxation time6, which would reduce the AH velocity and significantly suppress the intrinsic AH conductance σxy in the dirty limit35. Therefore, the calculated values of σxy here are generally larger than the experimental values shown in Fig. 2.

The temperature dependence of the AH resistance ρyx (Fig. 2f) can also be qualitatively interpreted by the above picture. For the m = 1, 2, and 3 samples, a large number of holes can be thermally excited with increasing temperature in both V-doped and undoped Sb2Te3 layers, thus weakening the electron transfer effect between these two layers, so ρyx of the Sb2Te3/V-doped Sb2Te3 heterostructure will become more similar to the m = 0 sample. The weakening of charge transfer effect explains the sign change of the AH resistance ρyx for the m = 3 sample with increasing temperature. When the temperature approaches towards TC, the magnitude of ρyx always decreases towards zero due to the disappearance of magnetization.

In the following, we discuss the different roles of the growth of the undoped TI layer and the application of the bottom-gate voltage for the AH change in our experiments. By varying the thickness of the undoped TI layer, it mainly affects the magnitude of the built-in electric fields and thus influences the electronic band structures and Berry curvature distribution, while the application of the gate voltage is primarily to induce the chemical potential shift. In addition, the metallic properties of highly hole-doped Sb2Te3 or V-doped Sb2Te3 samples might affect the distribution of the electric fields in TI/magnetic TI bilayer samples, i.e. the built-in electric field in the m QL Sb2Te3/5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 bilayers is very likely located only at the interface regime. Based on the above estimated chemical potential positions of different bilayer samples (Fig. 2) and chemical potential shift of the 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 sample (Fig. 3), we found both values are consistent with our built-in electric field picture, so our theoretical analysis qualitatively explains our experimental results.

Artificial “TH effect” in Cr-doped TI/TI/V-doped TI trilayer samples

Since the Cr-doped TI layer and Cr-doped TI/TI bilayer usually show the AH effect with a positive sign30 (see Supplementary Note 6), the realization of the AH effect with a negative sign in TI/V-doped TI bilayer structures provides us an opportunity to study two decoupled FM orders with opposite AH signs and different coercive fields (μ0Hc). Therefore, we fabricated the 5 QL Cr-doped Sb2Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 sandwich heterostructures (Fig. 5) and systematically studied its Hall traces at different temperatures. In our sandwich heterostructures, the middle 3 QL Sb2Te3 plays the following duo roles: (i) it weakens the interlayer coupling effects between the top and bottom magnetic TI layers; (ii) it drives the bottom V-doped TI shows the AH effect with negative sign, as discussed above. In Hall measurements, the two AH effects with opposite AH signs and different μ0Hc can be added together to form unusual AH hysteresis loops. When the absolute value of ρyx in Cr-doped TI is larger than that of V-doped TI, the AH effect of the Cr-doped TI layer is dominant, and the total AH hysteresis loop shows a positive sign (Fig. 5a), we named this as “Type 1” AH hysteresis loop. When the absolute value of ρyx in Cr-doped TI is less than that of V-doped TI, the AH effect of the V-doped TI layer is dominant, and the total AH hysteresis loop shows a negative sign (Fig. 5b), we named it as “Type 2” AH loop. In both cases, two anti-symmetric humps appear when the external magnetic field μ0H is between μ0Hc1 and μ0Hc2. Here μ0Hc1 and μ0Hc2 are the coercive fields of the top Cr-doped TI and the bottom V-doped TI layers, respectively. A “hump” feature in the AH hysteresis loop can result from the formation of chiral spin textures in samples and is usually known as the TH effect3639. The hump feature observed in our sandwich samples, on the other hand, is the result of the superposition of two AH effects with opposite signs.

Fig. 5. The artificial “TH effect” in magnetic TI/TI/magnetic TI sandwich heterostructures.

Fig. 5

a, b Two types of artificial “TH effect” formed by the parallel connection of two AH effects with opposite signs. Type 1 is constructed by the AH effect with the larger coercive field (μ0Hc) showing smaller ρyx, while Type 2 is constructed by the AH effect with the larger μ0Hc showing larger ρyx. c Schematic for the 5 QL Cr-doped Sb2Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL V-doped Sb2Te3 sandwich sample. d, g μ0H dependence of ρyx of the 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3 bilayer heterostructure measured at T = 2 K (d) and T = 12 K (g). e, h μ0H dependence of ρyx of the 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3 bilayer heterostructure measured at T = 2 K (e) and T = 12 K (h). f, i μ0H dependence of ρyx of the 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3 sandwich heterostructure measured at T = 2 K (f) and T = 12 K (i). The arrows indicate the magnetic field sweep directions.

We performed Hall measurements on the 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3 and 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3 bilayer samples. As discussed above, the former sample does show the AH effect with a negative sign (Fig. 5d, g), while the latter shows the AH effect with the positive sign (Fig. 5e, h), consistent with prior studies29,30 and our theoretical calculations (see Supplementary Note 9). Because the temperature dependences of ρyx in these two bilayer samples are different, both types of AH loops can be realized in the 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3 sample in different temperature regions (see Supplementary Note 6). Since the absolute value of ρyx in 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3 is larger than that of 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3 at T = 2 K, “Type 1” AH loop is observed (Fig. 5f). At T = 12 K, the absolute value of ρyx in 5 QL Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3/3 QL Sb2Te3 is comparable to or less than that of 3 QL Sb2Te3/5 QL Sb1.92V0.08Te3; therefore, “Type 2” AH loop appears (Fig. 5i). All observations here are consistent with our analysis in Fig. 5a, b, confirming that the TH effect-like hump feature observed in our Cr-doped TI/TI/V-doped TI sandwiches is indeed from the superposition of two AH effects with opposite signs. Our findings here, together with two prior studies40,41, suggest humps/dips features along with the AH effect observed in a number of bilayer heterostructure samples might not be induced by the formation of the chiral spin textures in samples31,4245. The TH-like hump feature observed in these bilayer heterostructures is likely also due to the coexistence of two decoupled FM orders. These two FM orders could be different ferromagnetisms in bulk and surface layers31,45 or different ferromagnetisms on two surfaces of the magnetic layer (i.e. SrRuO3)4244.

To summarize, we observed the sign reversal of the AH effect in magnetic TI samples by depositing an undoped TI layer on top to form bilayer heterostructures. Our observation is well interpreted by our first-principles calculations based on the model of charge transfer through the interface between TI and magnetic TI layers. We fabricated the magnetic TI/TI/magnetic TI sandwich sample with different dopants on two surfaces and observed two atypical humps in the AH loops. We demonstrated that the unusual AH hysteresis loops are induced by the superposition of two AH effects with opposite signs rather than the formation of the chiral spin textures in these samples. Our work provides a new route for the “engineering” of the AH effect in magnetic topological materials and insights into the underlying mechanism for the TH effect-like humps observed in inhomogeneous materials.

Methods

MBE growth of magnetic TI heterostructures

The magnetic TI films and heterostructures were grown on heat-treated 0.5-mm-thick insulating SrTiO3(111) substrates using two MBE chambers (Omicron Lab 10 and Vecco Applied EPI 620) with a base pressure of 2.0 × 10−10 mbar. Prior to sample growth, the SrTiO3 substrates are first degassed at ~600 °C for 1 h. High-purity Sb(6N), Te(6N), V(5N), and Cr(5N) are evaporated from Knudsen cells. During the growth of the magnetic TI films, the substrate is maintained at ~240 °C. The flux ratio of Te/(Sb + V/Cr) is set to be >10 to avoid possible Te deficiency in samples. The growth rate of magnetic TI or TI films is around ~0.2 QL/min. Finally, the samples are capped with a 10 nm Te layer to prevent their degradation during the ex situ electrical transport measurements. The V concentration in V-doped Sb2Te3 films is tuned by adjusting the temperature of the V effusion cell. The x = 0.08–0.2 samples correspond to the V cell temperatures from 1440 to 1490 °C. For the Sb1.84Cr0.16Te3 sample, the temperature of the Cr effusion cell is 1160 °C. The Cr and V concentration values in this work are calibrated by the plot in our prior work12.

Electrical transport measurements

All samples for transport measurements were scratched into Hall bar geometries (~1 mm × 0.5 mm)46. The bottom-gate electrode is made by pressing an indium foil on the backside of the SrTiO3 (111) substrate. Note that for all Hall data shown in this paper, unless pointed out, the ordinary Hall term has been subtracted by fitting the linear slope of the Hall data in a high magnetic field regime.

First-principles calculations

The V atom is doped in 2 × 2 × 5 supercell of Sb2Te3 (5 QL thickness) without breaking the spatial reversal symmetry. The concentration of vanadium is about 5% (i.e. Sb1.9V0.1Te3). The lattice parameters and the positions of atoms were fixed as the bulk ones, and we relaxed the dopants and atoms in the nearest neighbor of the dopants with an energy tolerance of 10−5 eV. A 20-Å vacuum layer is placed above the sample. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations are performed via the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) with exchange-correlation energy described by the generalized gradient approximation in the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof parametrization. We set the energy cutoff to ~300 eV for the plane-wave expansion. The van der Waals (vdW) correction is also included with the optB86b-vdW type in the relaxation process. An 8 × 8 × 1 Γ-centered k-mesh is used in structural relaxation with the energy tolerance converged to 10−6 eV. To consider strongly correlated 3d electrons of the V atoms, an LDA + U correction is implemented in the whole calculation with the parameter U = 2.7 eV and J = 0.7 eV. The spin–orbit coupling effect is included in band structure calculations. The AH conductance σxy is calculated in Wannier representation via the Wannier90 code. In the projection from Bloch representation to Wannier representation, considering the computation capability, the Γ-centered k-mesh is set to 5 × 5 × 1. To include the disorder effect in the magnetic TI samples, a 0.03 eV energy range is averaged in the calculated Hall conductance σxy. The maximal energy range is estimated by Erange=ħ2τ=0.09eV, where τ is the relaxation time estimated by the carrier mobility data from experiments and the effective mass of valence band edge from the m = 0 DFT calculations.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank W. D. Wu, D. Xiao, and X. D. Xu for helpful discussions. This work (transport measurements and data analysis) is primarily supported by the DOE grant (DE-SC0019064). The MBE growth of magnetic TI film/heterostructure samples is partially supported by ARO Young Investigator Program Award (W911NF1810198) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative (Grant GBMF9063 to C.-Z.C.). H.Z. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11674165, 12074181, and 11834006), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200007), the Fok Ying-Tung Education Foundation of China (161006), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (020414380149). N.S. acknowledges support from Penn State 2DCC-MIP under NSF grant DMR-1539916. W.Z. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52073075) and Shenzhen Science and Technology Progam (KQTD20170809110344233). F.W., W.L., and Z.Z. acknowledges support from the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFA0206302).

Author contributions

C.-Z.C. conceived and designed the experiment. Y.-F.Z. and D.X. grew the magnetic TI films and heterostructure samples with the help of N.S. and C.-Z.C. F.W., Y.-F.Z., and L.-J.Z. carried out the PPMS transport measurement with the help of M.H.W.C. and C.-Z.C. X.W., C.L., and H.Z. provided the theoretical support and did the first-principles calculations. F.W., X.W., C.L., H.Z., and C.-Z.C. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from H.Z. or C.-Z.C. upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Fei Wang, Xuepeng Wang, Yi-Fan Zhao.

Contributor Information

Haijun Zhang, Email: zhanghj@nju.edu.cn.

Cui-Zu Chang, Email: cxc955@psu.edu.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-20349-z.

References

  • 1.Hasan MZ, Kane CL. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:3045–3067. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qi XL, Zhang SC. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011;83:1057–1110. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weng HM, Yu R, Hu X, Dai X, Fang Z. Quantum anomalous Hall effect and related topological electronic states. Adv. Phys. 2015;64:227–282. doi: 10.1080/00018732.2015.1068524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xiao D, Chang MC, Niu Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:1959–2007. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berry MV. Quantal phase-factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1984;392:45–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald AH, Ong NP. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:1539–1592. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Karplus R, Luttinger JM. Hall effect in ferromagnetics. Phy. Rev. 1954;95:1154–1160. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.95.1154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jungwirth T, Niu Q, MacDonald AH. Anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;88:207208. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.207208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fang Z, et al. The anomalous Hall effect and magnetic monopoles in momentum space. Science. 2003;302:92–95. doi: 10.1126/science.1089408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yao YG, et al. First principles calculation of anomalous Hall conductivity in ferromagnetic bcc Fe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:037204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.037204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chang CZ, et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science. 2013;340:167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1234414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chang CZ, et al. High-precision realization of robust quantum anomalous Hall state in a hard ferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:473–477. doi: 10.1038/nmat4204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Checkelsky JG, et al. Trajectory of the anomalous Hall effect towards the quantized state in a ferromagnetic topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:731–736. doi: 10.1038/nphys3053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kou XF, et al. Scale-invariant quantum anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators beyond the two-dimensional limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:137201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.137201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chang CZ, Li MD. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in time-reversal-symmetry breaking topological insulators. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2016;28:123002. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/12/123002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu CX, Zhang SC, Qi XL. The quantum anomalous Hall effect: theory and experiment. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2016;7:301–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031115-011417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grauer S, et al. Coincidence of superparamagnetism and perfect quantization in the quantum anomalous Hall state. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:201304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kandala A, Richardella A, Kempinger S, Liu CX, Samarth N. Giant anisotropic magnetoresistance in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7434. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berger L. Side-jump mechanism for the Hall effect of ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B. 1970;2:4559–4566. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.4559. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smit J. The spontaneous Hall effect in ferromagnetics-1. Physica. 1955;21:877–887. doi: 10.1016/S0031-8914(55)92596-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smit J. The spontaneous Hall effect in ferromagnetics-II. Physica. 1958;24:39–51. doi: 10.1016/S0031-8914(58)93541-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edmonds KW, et al. Magnetoresistance and Hall effect in the ferromagnetic semiconductor Ga1-xMnxAs. J. Appl. Phys. 2003;93:6787–6789. doi: 10.1063/1.1556110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chun SH, et al. Interplay between carrier and impurity concentrations in annealed Ga1-xMnxAs: intrinsic anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:026601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.026601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shekhar C, et al. Anomalous Hall effect in Weyl semimetal half-Heusler compounds RPtBi (R = Gd and Nd) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:9140–9144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810842115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suzuki T, et al. Large anomalous Hall effect in a half-Heusler antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:1119–1123. doi: 10.1038/nphys3831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Manna K, et al. From colossal to zero: controlling the anomalous Hall effect in magnetic Heusler compounds via Berry curvature design. Phys. Rev. X. 2018;8:041045. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang CZ, et al. Zero-field dissipationless chiral edge transport and the nature of dissipation in the quantum anomalous Hall state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:057206. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.057206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ohno H, et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature. 2000;408:944–946. doi: 10.1038/35050040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chang CZ, et al. Thin films of magnetically doped topological insulator with carrier-independent long-range ferromagnetic order. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:1065–1070. doi: 10.1002/adma.201203493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang CZ, et al. Field-effect modulation of anomalous Hall effect in diluted ferromagnetic topological insulator epitaxial films. Sci. China Phys. Mech. 2016;59:637501. doi: 10.1007/s11433-015-5761-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yasuda K, et al. Geometric Hall effects in topological insulator heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:555–559. doi: 10.1038/nphys3671. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou ZH, Chien YJ, Uher C. Thin-film ferromagnetic semiconductors based on Sb2-xVxTe3 with TC of 177 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005;87:112503. doi: 10.1063/1.2045561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dyck JS, Hajek P, Losit’ak P, Uher C. Diluted magnetic semiconductors based on Sb2-xVxTe3 (0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.03) Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65:115212. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.115212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang Y, et al. Crossover of the three-dimensional topological insulator Bi2Se3 to the two-dimensional limit. Nat. Phys. 2010;6:584–588. doi: 10.1038/nphys1689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shiomi Y, Onose Y, Tokura Y. Effect of scattering on intrinsic anomalous Hall effect investigated by Lorenz ratio. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:054414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.054414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neubauer A, et al. Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:186602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee M, Kang W, Onose Y, Tokura Y, Ong NP. Unusual Hall rffect snomaly in MnSi under pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:186601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kanazawa N, et al. Large topological Hall effect in a short-period helimagnet MnGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:156603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.156603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Huang SX, Chien CL. Extended Skyrmion phase in epitaxial FeGe(111) thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:267201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.267201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fijalkowski KM, et al. Coexistence of surface and bulk ferromagnetism mimics Skyrmion Hall effect in a topological insulator. Phys. Rev. X. 2020;10:011012. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Groenendijk DJ, et al. Berry phase engineering at oxide interfaces. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020;2:023404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Matsuno J, et al. Interface-driven topological Hall effect in SrRuO3-SrIrO3 bilayer. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1600304. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ohuchi Y, et al. Electric-field control of anomalous and topological Hall effects in oxide bilayer thin films. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:213. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02629-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang LF, et al. Ferroelectrically tunable magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin oxide heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 2018;17:1087–1094. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.He QL, et al. Exchange-biasing topological charges by antiferromagnetism. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2767. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05166-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xiao D, et al. Realization of the axion insulator state in quantum anomalous Hall sandwich heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:056801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.056801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from H.Z. or C.-Z.C. upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES