Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence

Piergiorgio Floris; Maria Pina Dore; Giovanni Mario Pes

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245006

. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0245006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006

Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence

Piergiorgio Floris ¹, Maria Pina Dore ^2,³, Giovanni Mario Pes ^2,^4,^*

Editor: David Caramelli⁵

PMCID: PMC7785213 PMID: 33400701

Abstract

The discovery early in this century of the exceptional longevity of the Sardinian population has given new impetus to demographic studies of this phenomenon during the classical period. In the 1970s, it was hypothesised that the average mortality rate in Roman Sardinia was lower than in metropolitan Rome itself, postulating an ancient precedent for the remarkable longevity observable nowadays in the island’s population. In the present study, the available evidence was examined in order to test this hypothesis. Literary, juridical, epigraphic, papyrological, anthropological and archaeological sources regarding the population of the Roman Empire, including Sardinia, were retrieved by accessing Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases, as well as regional libraries, regardless of time limitation, and were independently reviewed by the authors. For Roman Sardinia, only funerary epitaphs were retrieved, in contrast with the numerous sources available for the whole Roman Empire. Inscriptions revealing the existence of three alleged nonagenarians, two centenarians, two ultracentenarians and one supercentenarian were found, corresponding to 2% in a total of 381 inscriptions. The majority were located in a highly Romanised rural area of central-western Sardinia. However, the ages reported in the epitaphs may be inaccurate because of the influence of confounders such as age rounding, approximations and/or amplifications, and are unrelated to the total number of inhabitants. In conclusion, the funerary evidence, the only available data from Roman Sardinia, is too weak to estimate the life expectancy of the local ancient population and cannot offer valuable arguments to support the hypothesis that exceptional longevity has been a Sardinian trait since Roman times.

Introduction

The twenty-year-old discovery of the exceptional longevity of people living on the Mediterranean island of Sardinia [1–4] has crowded the literature with studies focusing on the demography of this ethnic group over a wide period of time [5–8]. This trend was somewhat anticipated by the interest in historical demographic research on ancient Sardinians. In the Roman age, that is, from the first century BCE to the third century CE, the publication of studies based on the interpretation of epigraphic data foreshadowed the development of a fruitful line of investigation [9–10]. Robert J. Rowland, Jr., in the 1970s, conjectured that the average rate of mortality in Roman Sardinia was surprisingly lower than that measurable in the population of metropolitan Rome in the same period [9]. Rowland’s hypothesis, therefore, seemed to identify an ancient precedent for a demographic trait, such as longevity, currently observable in Sardinians.

Modern demographic research on Antiquity owes much to the analyses conducted by Karl Julius Beloch towards the end of the 19^th century [11], and by Keith Hopkins since the 1960s [12, 13]. Current developments in this field have proceeded, roughly, since 1980 and have been animated by lively discussions on methodology and the use of sources [14–19]. Indeed, issues about the latter ones are still a subject of discussion among scholars. Walter Scheidel has pointed out that ‘demography critically relies on numbers’ [20]. Unfortunately, the main obstacle in the study of ancient demography lies precisely in the scarcity of data. In fact, there is a severe lack of information on all three components forming the basis of statistical analyses performed on modern and contemporary populations: birth rate, mortality and mobility of people [21]. Some authors have tried to investigate specific population subgroups whose age is sufficiently attested, such as that of the Roman emperors who died of natural causes, finding an unexpected concordance between their age at death and the information predicted by various statistical models [22].

The application to the Roman world of demographic models developed for human societies considered similar, closer in time and better known, has long been an important feature of the debate. In this regard, scholars tend to be divided between more or less sceptical (e.g. Walter Scheidel) and optimistic (e.g. Bruce Frier) approaches [16, 17]. The need to employ other types of sources, such as the scientific archaeology of human remains and the molecular biology of diseases, with the well-known advantages of using novel investigation methods, has been pointed out by Jongman [23].

On this basis, in this study we reviewed all available evidence about Roman Sardinia to answer the following questions: was mortality in Roman Sardinia comparable to that of other regions of the empire? Is it possible that the current longevity of the Sardinian population has its roots in Roman times?

Materials and methods

Search strategy and study selection

In order to accomplish the purpose of the study, a comprehensive search was conducted for any available literary, juridical, epigraphic, papyrological, anthropological or archaeological evidence by accessing multiple databases of the published literature, i.e. Science Direct (http://www.sciencedirect.com/), PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), Scopus (http://www.scopus.com/home.uri) and Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/). All entries were examined, regardless of time or language limitation. Studies were identified using the following search query: ‘Roman Empire’, ‘demography’, ‘mortality’, ‘Sardinia’, ‘Roman Sardinia’, ‘funerary inscriptions’ or a combination thereof using the Boolean operators ‘AND’ and ‘OR’. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines as much as possible. In addition, for the literary and juridical sources we searched in the Digital Latin Library (DLL) (https://digitallatin.org/), in the Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum (CSL) (http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/), and in the Classical Latin Text (http://latin.packhum.org/). For epigraphic and papyrological sources we retrieved data from the Epigraphic Database Roma (EDR) (http://www.edr-edr.it/default/index.php), and the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (CIL) (http://cil.bbaw.de/), as well as the website Papyri Info (http://papyri.info/) which provides material from the Advanced Papyrological Information System (APIS), Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri (DDbDP), Heidelberger Gesamtverzeichnis der griechischen Papyrusurkunden Ägyptens (HGV), and Bibliographie Papyrologique (BP). Lastly, texts from the main Sardinian libraries, including the ones from the University of Cagliari and Sassari were retrieved and consulted. Publications containing descriptions of burial findings in Sardinia were independently and blinded examined by two authors (Floris P and Pes GM) and any resulting discrepancy was discussed among all authors to reach a final consensus. Documentary sources were considered eligible for the analysis on the basis of their reliability and similarity with the demographic structure of better known pre-modern and modern populations of Europe (18^th century), and especially Asia (China), India and Egypt of the 19^th and early 20^th century [16, 20].

Results and discussion

In the preliminary screening we were able to retrieve hundreds of articles, books and ancient inscriptions relating to Roman Sardinia. Articles quoting Sardinia marginally in the context of the Roman Empire, or without providing specific demographic data, were excluded from the analysis. Similarly, anthropological articles, reporting findings on skeletal remains in Sardinia were excluded if they did not encompass the Roman era, or if the age of the bones was not provided. Likewise, articles on Roman epigraphy that did not mention Sardinia were excluded. Following the preliminary screening only funerary epitaphs were retrieved for Roman Sardinia, including the texts of all 390 Latin funerary inscriptions reported by Rowland [9]. Moreover, articles of historical demography, from the end of the 19^th century to the present, reporting data on the average lifespan in Sardinia compared to other regions of the Roman Empire were considered eligible and used to discuss similarities and differences.

Literary sources

Ancient literary sources about mortality in Roman times are the outcome of an élite culture characterised by rhetorical and philosophical purposes [24]. Evidence concerning cases of exceptional longevity is not rare. However, the statistical significance of this information is invalidated by the absence of systematic method, a mixture of references to historical and mythical realities and the pervasive anecdotal and wondrous value that characterises this ancient material. Some of these features are found in a large section of Pliny the Elder’s Naturalis historia (23–79 CE), which focuses on the topic of human life-span (Plin, Nat 7, 49, 153–164). An exemplary case is that of T. Fullonius, from Bologna, who in the census conducted by the emperor Claudius and L. Vitellius in 47–48 CE, declared himself to be 150 years old. Pliny reports that the emperor, intrigued, conducted cross-investigations on other documents relating to Fullonius, confirming the information’s accuracy (Plin, Nat 7, 49, 159). After lingering on some astrological theories, relating to the maximum duration of human life (between 112 and 124 years), criticised by the author precisely for their variety (Plin, Nat 7, 49, 160–162) the antiquarian writer reported the existence of approximately 80 centenarians, ultracentenarians and supercentenarians who would have been identified in the VIII Augustan region of Italy (Aemilia) in the census of 73/74 CE. Pliny also reports that as many as 27 of them declared ages of between 110 and 140 years (Plin, Nat 7, 49, 162–164). Other ancient authors such as Valerius Maximus and Phlegon of Tralles underline with greater emphasis the ‘prodigious’ aspects found in the Plinian passage. The first, in his work Factorum et dictorum memorabilium libri IX, written under Tiberius (14–37 CE), described persons who lived to an advanced age, proposing at the same time examples from reality and myth (Val Max. 9, 13). Phlegon, a freedman of the Emperor Hadrian (117–138 CE), in his Opuscula de rebus mirabilibus et de longaevis, reported a list of centenarians extracted from Roman census lists or literary tradition [25]. Notwithstanding the dubious credibility of the declarations made by these people to the census authorities, these data certainly attest to the presence of extremely old individuals in the Roman age, although they are not useful for statistical purposes.

Juridical evidence

In the Justinian’s Digest, there is a passage from the work ‘Ad legem de vicesima hereditatum’ by the jurist Aemilius Macer (third century CE) that contains a comment concerning an Augustan law of 6 CE establishing a 5% tax on inheritance [26]. The passage mentions two schemes that attracted the attention of demography scholars: the first refers to the famous jurist Ulpian (c. 170–228 CE), while the second, albeit from an unknown epoch and author, is older. The schemes were used to estimate, on average and without distinction of sex, how long a life annuity could last in relation to the beneficiary’s age, hence the definition of Ulpian’s Life Table. Although it is not clear to which kind of people it refers (freeborn, ex-slaves, slaves, all) or how data were collected, it was thought that they–and mostly Ulpian’s scheme–provide reference data to evaluate how long, on average, people of different ages could expect to live in the early third century CE [16, 27]. Among other inaccuracies, the table reveals an obvious gap in life expectancy estimation during early childhood, likely because children did not receive annuities [27]. However, Ulpian’s Table seems to confirm the existence in Roman times of a dramatic infant mortality rate, a feature comparable to other pre-modern populations. Bruce Frier [16] proposed, in this regard, a comparison with Model West Level 2 of the Regional Model Life Tables of Princeton [28] and thus a low life expectancy at birth, around the age of 21 years. Despite the favourable consideration shown by Frier towards Ulpian’s Table, most scholars are inclined to refuse its use to obtain information on the demographic structure of the Roman population [13, 14, 17]. Nonetheless, Robert Woods has recently found elements of contact between his novel demographic tables and Ulpian’s Life Table [29].

Epigraphic evidence

The tens of thousands of funerary inscriptions indicating age at death found in all areas of the Roman world have long been considered an important source for mortality and ‘average’ life expectancy. Many studies carried out in the past used data from funerary inscriptions to draw conclusions about the average age at death of people living in different regions of the Roman Empire. For instance, the Harkness's study, based on the inscriptions contained in the Corpus of Latin Inscriptions, reported the following average age at death in those who survived up to the age of 10 in various regions of the Roman Empire: Rome (29.3), Latium (29.6), Cisalpine Gaul (32.1), Bruttii, Lucania, Campania, Sicily and Sardinia (33.7), Calabria, Apulia and Samnium (34.8), England (36.5), Asia and Greece (36.8), Aemilia, Etruria and Umbria (37.1), Spain (37.8), and Africa (53.3). This early report highlighted the wide heterogeneity of mortality in the different parts of the Roman Empire and, specifically, the relatively longer life span in Sardinia compared with Rome itself [30].

The impressive catalogue of ages at death in the Roman era composed by János Szilágiy between 1961 and 1967 further highlights the interest in this material [31–36]. However, in 1966, Keith Hopkins claimed the inadequacy of funeral inscriptions as sources for demographic research: ‘we cannot tell how much the longevity recorded in African inscriptions is the product of commemoration or of actual longevity’ [12]. Epigraphic data would be influenced, indeed, by uncontrollable socio-cultural and economic confounders [21], related to factors such as age, sex, location and living conditions. Therefore, with the partial exception of Bruce Frier who spared some North African epigraphic samples [16], most scholars consider funerary texts to be unreliable for studies on mortality rate and life expectancy [13, 14, 17, 20, 37–39]. Accordingly, studies carried out in the past on the ages retrieved from epitaphs ‒ like Rowland’s one about Sardinia [9] ‒ did not provide information on population mortality and average life span, but only provided the median lifespan of the people commemorated in the texts [20].

Beyond the doubts regarding the demographic value of the epigraphic age indication, the attention of scholars focused also on their accuracy. First, it is well-known that, in Roman epitaphs, ages that are multiples of 5 are much more frequent than is admitted by statistics [40–42]. This observation led Tim Parkin to wonder whether the average Roman had an exact knowledge of his/her age, and whether at that epoch such a notion was as important to people as it is today [42]. The question was posed even though in many epitaphs biometric data are reported analytically with the indication of the number of years, months, days and even hours lived. In fact, Parkin formulated the hypothesis, perhaps worthy of further verification, that such scrupulous data may be related to the importance that the Romans attached to the celebration of their birthday and with their belief in astrology [42].

In conclusion, it seems better to consider funerary texts as the result of the commemorative practices of a specific area rather than as a faithful reflection of the demographic reality. Although these sources are useless for statistical analyses, their value remains high for social, cultural and economic investigations into commemoration mechanisms.

Papyrological evidence

Papyrological source, which survived the particular climatic conditions of some areas of Egypt, are considered more reliable by Roman demography scholars. They consist of birth and death declarations included in about 300 acts related to provincial censuses, providing information on more than 1,100 people living in the first three centuries CE [16, 17]. Compared to other evidence of Roman provincial censuses, recently studied by Béatrice Le Teuff [43], those from Egypt have an intrinsic demographic value as they are more appropriate for mortality and life expectancy assessments than other evidence of Roman provincial censuses [16, 20]. In addition, Walter Scheidel considered papyri the cornerstone of mortality research [20]. The most exhaustive analyses of these documents have been performed by Roger Bagnall and Bruce Frier [44] and by Walter Scheidel [45], estimating life expectancy at birth in the order of 22.5 years, although it would be hasty to extend their results to the whole Roman Empire [17, 21]. Furthermore, the peculiar geographic and climatic conditions of Egypt, characterised by remarkable internal variability, contributed to the creation of distinctive pathogenic environments probably affecting the mortality and demographic structure of the local population [16, 17, 21].

Archaeological evidence

Palaeodemographic investigations conducted on skeletal remains found in Roman burial sites aim at identifying sex, age at death and characteristics of the physical development of the deceased [46‒49]. Skeletal anthropology also provided valuable information on eating habits, health status, diseases and causes of death [16], and in some cases it provided information on mortality aspects little represented in other types of sources, for example foetuses and children under 5 years of age [50]. However, Walter Scheidel noted at least two factors that make skeletal remains from a specific burial site not representative of local demography: not all members of a given population may have been buried in the same place due to socio-cultural conditioning (age, gender, class); moreover, it seems impossible to measure the impact of migratory phenomena on the formation of the sample [17].

The excavations conducted in the necropolis of the Roman suburbs in recent decades have provided interesting anthropological and demographic data. The distribution of the ages at death shows that most of the deceased are in the age group of 20–49 years, and just over 4% refer to individuals over the age of 50 [51]. In addition, it was observed that most burials pertain to people belonging to lower social classes (slaves, freedmen) and several diseases affecting the population in the imperial age were identified. There are no data related to the age at death of skeletal remains in Sardinia of the Roman epoch, although physical anthropology research provided data for the prehistorical era in several sub-regions of Sardinia as described by Sanna et al. [52].

Methodologies to establish the demographic structure of ancient populations developed by palaeodemographic scholars are certainly promising and, in the future, they will play an important role in filling our knowledge gap.

The comparative approach: Model Life Tables

The shortage of documentary sources, as well as uncertainty about their reliability, have led many scholars to adopt a comparative approach. Accordingly, scholars applied to the Roman Empire sets of demographic tables developed for more recent societies with a demographic structure assumed to be comparable to the Roman. In the 1960s, Keith Hopkins used the U.N. Model Life Tables [12] while afterwards, and up to the present day, the Regional Model Life Tables developed in Princeton since the 1960s by Ansley Coale and Paul Demeny were mostly adopted [13]. Even if specific Model Life Tables are sometimes used (e.g. Model South Level 3 Female, Model West Level 2, 4 or even 6), Model West Level 3 Female (adopted indifferently for men and women) is generally considered by scholars to be the most suitable to represent the Roman population [22].

The framework outlined by Model West Level 3 Female refers to a society characterised by remarkably high infant mortality and a life expectancy at birth of approximately 25 years. Infant mortality rates would have been balanced by equally high birth rates. Therefore, the Roman population would have been composed mostly of young people and adults up to the age of 50, while people over the age of 60 would have been much less numerous, and people over 80 rare [16, 42]. In a recent study, Robert Woods endorsed new sets of tables made in the 1970s, assuming a percentage of childhood deaths lower than usually expected, given the generally high levels of mortality. This would result in higher life expectancy at birth and higher mortality than previously thought for people aged between 15 and 49 years [29].

A specific approach to the use of demographic tables has been made by Bruce Frier since the beginning of 1980s, by using Model Life Tables to test data derived from ancient sources such as Ulpian’s Life Table, skeletal remains found in some funerary sites and data from the Egyptian papyri [27, 44, 53]. Nevertheless, Frier observed that caution is required in the application of the tables to the Roman world, because the overall mortality of this vast area will have been the outcome of the demographic patterns of different regions of the Empire influenced by factors such as time, geography and perhaps individual social status [16]. Walter Scheidel excluded the notion that Model Life Tables can provide a reliable picture of Roman society, which was characterised by high mortality and considerable local variations in causes of death, considering ecology, climate and pathogenic environments as useful elements [21].

Mortality in Roman Sardinia

The identification of the major causes of death in Roman society would be helpful to understand its demographic structure. Under normal conditions, or in the absence of acute events such as the plagues of the second and third centuries CE [54, 55], the impact of infectious diseases on mortality was highly significant [17]. For example, the leading causes of death were malaria, diseases of the respiratory system (e.g. pneumonia and tuberculosis) and water- and food-borne epidemics (e.g. typhoid and cholera dysentery) [16]. However, the vastness and long duration of the Roman Empire make it improbable that identical causes acted everywhere and constantly in the same way. For example, differences existed between the pathogenic environments of the Alps and of the Egyptian marshy regions, and even over much shorter distances such as between rural and urban areas [21]. In the Mediterranean regions, the role of seasonal diseases such as malaria was undoubtedly relevant; in large geographic areas of Sardinia, fever caused by Plasmodium falciparum demanded a strong tribute of human lives [56], and associated malnutrition may have contributed to weakening the resistance of inhabitants, making them more susceptible to additional respiratory and gastrointestinal disorders [56‒58]. Paleochristian funeral inscriptions have proved particularly useful in identifying the seasonal variation of deaths, as they often contain an indication of the day and month of death of the commemorated deceased [59–61]. In areas such as Sardinia, seasonality could be attributable to malaria, although not all Sardinian subregions were equally malarial, causing significant differences in local mortality and life expectancy patterns (Plin, Nat 7, 49, 162–164; Val Max. 9–13) [21]. Unfortunately, the prevalence and influence of malaria among adults in southern Italy including Sardinia remain unknown [62]. Moreover, modifications concerning climate, deforestation, urbanisation and extensive development of trade may have changed the epidemiological peculiarities of some areas over the centuries. On the other hand, these conditions could have been responsible for the spread of malaria or other diseases previously unknown in the West, such as those that caused the great epidemics of the second and third centuries CE [21, 63].

The reconstruction of the demography of Roman Sardinia suffers from all the difficulties described above for the whole Roman world, further worsened by an even lower availability of sources. First of all, the number and density of the island inhabitants is unknown. Karl Julius Beloch estimated that about 300,000 people lived in Roman Sardinia [11], later followed by Piero Meloni and Attilio Mastino [64, 65]. Meloni also suggested as a possible alternative half the number proposed by Beloch. However, both estimates are unverifiable, and it is unlikely that the number of islanders remained stable during the nearly seven centuries in which Sardinia was a Roman province. The demographic consequences of the brutal military operations conducted on the island by Romans in the third and second centuries BCE, the possible effects of the plagues of the second and third centuries CE and the impact of migration flows throughout the seven centuries of Roman rule, are totally unknown [65].

Mortality and average age were calculated in the past mostly on the basis of ages engraved in epitaphs. In the article ‘Mortality in Roman Sardinia’ published in the 1970s, the North American scholar Robert J. Rowland Jr. reported the age at death of 390 Latin epitaphs (132 women and 238 men) dating back between the first and third centuries CE [9]. The weighted average age at death of Sardinians recorded on the inscriptions was 35.8 years (32.2 years for women and 37.6 years for men), i.e. much higher than the 23.4 years calculated for the city of Rome by using the same method. In a recent review of Sardinian data conducted on 381 valuable testimonials and contained in inscriptions datable between the first and third centuries CE [66] (Fig 1A), the number of epitaphs dedicated to children deceased between 0 and 9 years of age was overall 14%, rising up to 28% for young people who died between 10 and 19 years of age, while the percentage for people over 60 years was 18%, and about 4% and 1% for people aged over 80 and over 100, respectively. These results are largely in contrast with both the general framework described for a society with high mortality levels, and with the demographic tables themselves. Results from Sardinian epitaphs showed lower than expected age at death for children, and higher for the elderly, even though the longevity peaks of Roman Africa were not attained.

Epigraphic data can also be used to detect age differences across the island. Whereas in the rural areas of central-western Sardinia (Fig 1B) commemorations of the elderly reached the maximum levels (about 30% and 6% for people over the age of 60 and for individuals aged 100 or more years, respectively, out of nearly fifty valuable ages), in urban areas such as Turris Libisonis (= Porto Torres), the picture was completely different (Fig 1C). More specifically, about 8% of people were over 60 years of age out of almost fifty valuable ages, and no inscription was dedicated to people who died over the age of 69 years.

In the Roman funerary inscriptions of Sardinia dating between the first and third centuries CE, there is mention of three nonagenarians, two centenarians, two ultracentenarians and one supercentenarian (overall about 2% of the 381 testimonies screened). Five of them were found in a region of central-western Sardinia with predominantly rural features. As far as we know, the oldest long-lived person was [T]arcisius son of Tarinci, a man who, according to his funerary inscription (discovered just before 1990 at Filighes in the territory of Ula Tirso) died around the first half of the second century CE at the age of 115 years (EDR142233 EDR = Epigraphic Database Roma, accessed at http://www.edr-edr.it/default/index.php) [67, 68]. The two ultracentenarians are ‘Monioritini’—the name is almost certainly declined—and Belsa, died at 106 and 101 years of age, respectively. The epitaph of the former, perhaps dating to the first half of the first century CE, was also found in the Ula Tirso territory, in an area known as Tilisai [68], while Belsa’s tomb was discovered in the plateau Su Planu ‘e pischinas, a few kilometres away from the villages of Fordongianus and Paulilatino (EDR153075) [68]. In both cases, the names are likely indigenous; owing to this and to the lack of clear hints in the inscriptions, it is impossible to ascertain the gender of the deceased. Despite its more Roman or ‘Romanised’ sound, the name [T]arcisius could nonetheless have had a local origin [66, 68]. The indigenous background of the three centenarians is also presumable from the use (unquestionable for [T]arcisius and probable for the other two) of a particular type of funeral monument, the ‘cippo a capanna’ (hut-shaped tombstone). Nonetheless, the fact that their graves were accompanied by an inscription written in Latin suggests Roman cultural influence. These three testimonies from central-western Sardinia therefore seem to outline a quite precise picture: people from mainly rural areas imbued with the local indigenous background but influenced by Roman culture.

However, only three cases cannot have statistical relevance, and the alleged homogeneity of the picture does not seem to be confirmed by two other epigraphs from the same area mentioning nonagenarians. The first inscription, from Sa Pala ‘e sa Cresia in the territory of Allai, recalls the ninety-one year old Iulia Helpis (EDR132678) [68, 69], while the second one, discovered in Austis, mentions the nonagenarian Ma(rcus) Cornelius Memor [68, 70]. From the onomastic point of view, both persons have little connection with [T]arcisius, Monioritini and Belsa. Despite the uncommon writing of his prænomen, Ma(rcus) Cornelius Memor has a fully Latin name, while Iulia Helpis, with her imperial nomen gentilicium and the Greek cognomen, represents almost an onomastic synthesis of the Graeco-Roman world. Even the social context of the two appears different: Ma(rcus) Cornelius Memor was perhaps an ex-soldier of the Roman garrison stationed in Austis [68, 71], while the status of Iulia Helpis, probably a former mistress or former slave of the man who commemorated her (the text does not allow a definitive conclusion), reflects a clear Roman cultural background.

Evidence of old people is not limited to the central-western part of Sardinia. Two other centenarians are known from inscriptions found in places located at the northern and southern ends of the island. A marble slab containing the epitaph of Disia Mosc(h)is (EDR081178) [72] was found in Capo Testa near Santa Teresa di Gallura in the mid-1980s. The woman, sister of the dedicator Eufrosinus (= Euphrosynus), would have died at 100 years. Although the age of Eufrosinus is unknown, as brother of the deceased he must have been old as well [72]. The onomastic of Disia Mosc(h)is and Eufrosinus has features very similar to those of Iulia Helpis and possibly shared the environment of freedmen and slaves.

The last testimony of a Sardinian centenarian was found in Karales (= Cagliari), the provincial capital, a populous city where the impact of malaria must have been far from negligible. During the 18^th century, in the church of San Lucifero in Cagliari was found a cupa (barrel)—a type of funerary monument widespread in Karales [73] as well as in central-western Sardinia [74, 75]—bearing four epitaphs (EDR086433) [76]. Among the inscriptions, all concerning people from the same family, there is also one for Flavia Eu(h)odia, a woman dead at about (plus minus) 100 years, between the second half of the second and the first half of the third century CE. Indicators such as the imperial Flavian nomen gentilicium, the cognomen of Greek origin and the use of a cupa suggest a servile past of the woman’s family. The plus minus expression, referring to the years lived by Flavia Eu(h)odia, infrequent in inscriptions prior to the third century CE [76, 77], seems to indicate that her sons did not know the exact age of their mother. Finally, the epitaph of L(ucius) Herennius Saturus, who died at the age of 90 years, is engraved in a funerary altar found in the 1950s in Vallermosa, a town not far from Cagliari [78]. The name of the deceased appears to be fully Roman, although some scholars believe that the cognomen Satur(us), in areas heavily imbued with Punic traditions such as southern Sardinia, may represent the translation into Latin of a Punic personal name [66, 79].

The discovery of the exceptional longevity of the population of inner Sardinia at the turn of the 21^st century raised the question of its historical origin and, in particular, of whether it could date back to the epoch of Roman rule. However, ascertaining the connection is difficult due to the scarcity of data relating to the Sardinian population in that period, as well as to the general uncertainty about the demography of the Roman population in Antiquity. In this review, we have examined the few documentary sources available in order to shed light on this problematic question.

Presumably, the Sardinian population in the Roman era overall exhibited characteristics similar to that of the rest of the empire, and comparable to other pre-industrial populations characterised by high mortality and high birth rates. In such conditions, life expectancy at birth likely ranged from approximately 20 to 30 years [12], though the possibility cannot be ruled out that both values, depending on local circumstances, were lower or higher [21]. Although the hypothesis that young people represented an important portion of the inhabitants of the Empire appears acceptable, the same cannot be affirmed for older people. Another factor that might have played a confounding role, and which must be taken into account in deciphering the demography of Sardinia in early centuries CE, is the different extension of Romanisation on the island, which has been documented for coastal areas and inland plains, but from which the central mountainous areas remained largely exempt due to the anti-Roman resistance of indigenous populations (Fig 1A).

Considering the available sources that have been reviewed, the literary, juridical, papyrological ones remain silent, and only the epigraphic and partly the archaeological ones offer a few glimpses about the existence of long-lived individuals in Sardinia. As far as the epigraphic sources are concerned, we reviewed the eight epitaphs spanning over three centuries (1^st-3^rd CE) mentioning cases of extremely old persons. The ages of these long-livers may be inaccurate because of the influence of confounding factors, e.g. rounding, approximations, and/or amplifications, and are not related to the total number of inhabitants. Moreover, the study of these funerary inscriptions in Sardinia has shown a different distribution of the ages at death between the north (the Roman colony of Turris Libisonis) and the central western part of the island, which, apart from the occasional nature of funerary finds, seems to a large extent due to the different value attributed to the elderly in commemorative practices rather than to differences in the underlying demographic structure of the population. Importantly, the demographic weight of these alleged centenarians, ultra-centenarians and supercentenarians on the total population is unknown, because in the Roman world the access to ‘memory’ provided by the funeral inscription was a privilege of the few [76, 80]. These data hardly allow the conclusion of a large prevalence of elderly people of the island. The situation seems analogous to that of some regions of North Africa where epitaphs of old people are so frequent that they suggest the existence of a longevity hot-spot [50]. However, this hypothesis is now debated by scholars, in whose opinion African inscriptions have been altered by the local practices of commemoration, influenced by an extraordinary consideration of the elderly [12, 16, 45]. These explanations are largely plausible even though the question needs further investigation beyond the purposes of this paper.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that, in the pagan funerary inscription of Roman Sardinia, there is not enough evidence to formulate definitive conclusions regarding people who lived beyond the age of 60. Although epitaphs can be of great importance for cultural history, in the absence of reliable demographic data, we cannot confirm that Roman Sardinia was ‘a country of old men’, nor that longevity in Sardinia is a mere extension of a phenomenon present since Roman times.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PRISMA checklist.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(64.5KB, doc)}

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

1.Pes GM. The Sardinian Centenarian Study. Research Workshop on “Genes, Genealogy and Longevity”; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft: Montpellier, France, 1999.
2.Poulain M, Pes GM, Grasland C, Carru C, Ferrucci L, Baggio G, et al. Identification of a geographic area characterized by extreme longevity in the Sardinia island: the AKEA study. Exp Gerontol 2004;39:1423‒1429. 10.1016/j.exger.2004.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Pes GM, Poulain M. Blue zones In: Pachana NA(ed) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, Springer, Singapore: 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4.Poulain M, Buettner D, Pes GM. Blue Zones. In: Rattan SIS(Ed), Encyclopedia of Biomedical Gerontology Elsevier, Academic Press, 2020, vol 1, pp 296–305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5.Caselli G, Pozzi L, Vaupel JW, Deiana L, Pes GM, Carru C, et al. Family clustering in Sardinian longevity: a genealogical approach. Exp Gerontol 2006;41:727‒736. 10.1016/j.exger.2006.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Poulain M, Pes GM, Salaris L. A population where men live as long as women: Villagrande Strisaili, Sardinia. J Aging Res 2011;2011:153756 10.4061/2011/153756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Caselli G, Lapucci E, Lipsi RM, Pozzi L, Baggio G, Carru C, et al. Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality. Demographic Research 2014;31:1275–1296. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.42 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Pes GM, Errigo A, Tedde P, Dore MP. Sociodemographic, clinical and functional profile of nonagenarians from two areas of Sardinia characterized by distinct longevity levels Rejuvenation Res. 2020;23:341–348. 10.1089/rej.2018.2129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Rowland RJ. Mortality in Roman Sardinia. Studi Sardi 1971. –72; 22: 359–368. [Google Scholar]
10.Corda AM. Indagine biometrica sulle iscrizioni latine della Sardegna. Valutazione dei dati, Cagliari 1995 [Google Scholar]
11.Beloch KJ. Die Bevölkerung der griechisch-römischen Welt. Leipzig, Duncker and Humblot, 1886 [Google Scholar]
12.Hopkins K. On the probable age structure of the Roman population. Population studies 1966; 20: 245–264. 10.1080/00324728.1966.10406097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Hopkins K. Graveyards for Historians In: F Hinard (ed), La mort, les morts et l’au-delà, Actes du Colloque (Caen 20–22 Novembre 1985), Caen 1987, pp. 113–126.
14.Parkin TG. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University. Press, 1992 [Google Scholar]
15.Corvisier J-N and Suder W. La population de l’antiquité classique. Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 2000. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00132.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16.Frier BW. Demography. In: Bowman AK, Garnsey P, and Rathbone D (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History XI: The High Empire, AD 70–192, Cambridge, 2000, pp 787–816.
17.Scheidel W. Progress and Problems in Roman Demography. In: W Scheidel (ed), Debating Roman Demography, Brill, Leiden, 2001, pp 1–81.
18.Holleran C and Pudsey A. Introduction studies in ancient historical demography In: C Holleran, A Pudsey (edS), Demography and the Graeco-Roman World: New Insights and Approaches, Cambridge, 2011, pp 1–7
19.Hin S. 2015: Ancient Demography In: Clayman D L (ed) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics New York: Oxford University Press; Online publication. 10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20.Scheidel W. Epigraphy and Demography: Birth, Marriage, Family, and Death. Version 1.0, 2007. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrncom/abstract=1096436
21.Scheidel W. Roman Age Structure: Evidence and Models. The Journal of Roman Studies 2001;91:1–26. 10.2307/3184767 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22.Scheidel W. Emperors, aristocrats, and the Grim Reaper: towards a demographic profile of the Roman elite. Class Quarterly. 1999;49:254–281. 10.1093/cq/49.1.254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Jongman W.M. Demography of the Ancient Roman World. In: Smith C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology Springer, New York, NY, 2014. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1446 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24.Scheidel W. Demography. In: Scheidel W, Morris I and Saller RP (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp 38–86 10.1007/s00292-007-0915-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25.Phlegon, Opuscula de rebus mirabilibus et de longaevis. A Stramaglia (ed), Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Berlin—New York, De Gruyter, 2011 pp 61–92. 10.1515/9783110239058 [DOI]
26.2 ad leg Vig Hered: Dig XXXV, 2, 68 pr, in: Watson A. The Digest of Justinian. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.
27.Frier BW. Roman Life Expectancy: Ulpian’s Evidence. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 1982; 86: 213–251. 10.2307/311195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Coale AJ and Demeny P. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Academic Press, 2nd edition, New York, 1983 [Google Scholar]
29.Woods R. Ancient and Early Modern Mortality: Experience and Understanding. Economic History Review, 2007; 60: 373–399. 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2006.00367.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30.Harkness AG. Age at marriage and at death in the Roman Empire. Trans. Amer. Philol. Assoc. 1896; 27, p. 66. [Google Scholar]
31.Szilágiy J. Beiträge zur Statistik der Sterblichkeit in den westeuropäischen Provinzen des römischen Imperiums, Acta Arch Hung 1961;13:125–155 [Google Scholar]
32.Szilágiy J. Beiträge zur Statistik der Sterblichkeit in der Illyrischen Provinzgruppe und in Norditalien (Gallia Padana), Acta Arch Hung 1962;14:297–396 [Google Scholar]
33.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den Städten Mittel- und Süd-Italiens sowie in Hispanien (in der römischen Kaiserzeit), Acta Arch Hung 1963;15:129–224 [Google Scholar]
34.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen I, Acta Arch Hung 1965;17:309–334 [Google Scholar]
35.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen II, Acta Arch Hung 1966;18:235–377 [Google Scholar]
36.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen III, Acta Arch Hung 1967;19:25–59 [Google Scholar]
37.Duncan-Jones RP. 1990: Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 96–100. [Google Scholar]
38.Saller RP. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp 13–15. [Google Scholar]
39.Hin S. The Demography of Roman Italy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013 [Google Scholar]
40.Duncan-Jones RP. Age-Rounding, Illiteracy and Social Differentiation in the Roman Empire. Chiron 1977; 7: 333–353 [Google Scholar]
41.Duncan-Jones RP. Age-Rounding in Greco-Roman Egypt. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 1979;33:169–177 [Google Scholar]
42.Parkin TG. Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2003 [Google Scholar]
43.Le Teuff B. Les recensements augustéens, aux origines de l’EmpirE Pallas: Revue d’Études Antiques 2014; 96: 75–90. 10.4000/pallas.1179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44.Bagnall RS and Frier BW. The Demography of Roman Egypt 2nd ed, Cambridge, 2006
45.Scheidel W. Death on the Nile: Disease and the Demography of Roman Egypt, Leiden, 2001
46.Buchet L and Séguy I. 2002: La paléodémographie aujourd’hui: bilan et perspectives. Annales de démographie historique. 1: 161–212. 10.3917/adh.103.0161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
47.Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW. Paleodemography: Age Distributions from Skel et al. Samples Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. 10.1002/ajpa.10000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
48.Caussinus H, Courgeau D. Estimer l'âge sans le mesurer en paléodémographie. Population 2010; 65: 117–145. 10.3917/popu.1001.0117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
49.Caussinus H, Courgeau D. A new method for estimating age-at-death Structure In: Séguy I, Buchet L (eds) Handbook of palaeodemography Springer, Dordrecht, 2013, pp 255–286.
50.Lassère J‒ M. Ubique populus. Peuplement et mouvements de population dans l'Afrique romaine de la chute de Carthage à la fin de la dynastie des Sévères (146 av. J. C. - 235 ap J. C.). Paris: Ed du CNRS, 1977 [Google Scholar]
51.Minozzi S, Catalano P, Caldarini C, Fornaciari G. Palaeopathology of human remains from the Roman Imperial Age. Pathobiology. 2012;79(5):268–283. 10.1159/000338097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Sanna E. Il popolamento della Sardegna e le origini dei sardi. CUEC Editrice, 2006. [Google Scholar]
53.Frier BW. Roman Life Expectancy: the Pannonian Evidence. Phoenix 1983; 37: 328–344. [Google Scholar]
54.Lo Cascio E. (ed). L’impatto della “Peste Antonina”, Edipuglia, Bari, 2007
55.Harper K. Il destino di Roma. Clima, epidemie e la fine di un impero. Einaudi, Torino, 2019, pp 125–147, 174–185.
56.Tognotti E. La malaria in Sardegna: per una storia del paludismo nel Mezzogiorno (1880–1950), Franco Angeli, Milano, 1996
57.Sallares R. Malaria and Rome. A History of malaria in Ancient Italy, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York, 93, 2002, pp 123–140. [Google Scholar]
58.Tognotti E. The Spread of malaria in Sardinia: An Historical Perspective In: LS Greene, ME Danubio (eds), Adaptation to malaria: The Interaction of Biology and Culture, Gordon and Breach Pub, Amsterdam, 1997, pp 237–247.
59.Scheidel W. Libitina’s Bitter Gains: Seasonal Mortality and Endemic Disease in the Ancient City of Rome. Ancient Society 1994; 25: 151–175. 10.2143/AS.25.0.2005846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
60.Scheidel W. Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Explorations in Ancient Demography. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Portsmouth, 1996 [Google Scholar]
61.Shaw BD. Seasons of Death: Aspects of Mortality in Imperial Rome. The Journal of Roman Studies 1996; 86: 100–138. 10.2307/300425 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
62.Marciniak S, Prowse TL, Herring DA, Klunk J, Kuch M, Duggan AT, et al. Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 1st-2nd century CE southern Italy. Curr Biol. 2016;26(23):R1220–R1222. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Sallares R. Ecology In: Scheidel W, Morris Iand Saller RP (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp 15–37. 10.1186/1472-6785-7-15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
64.Meloni P. La Sardegna romana. Ilisso, Nuoro, 2012, 90, pp 298–299. [Google Scholar]
65.Mastino A. La Sardegna al centro del Mediterraneo. In S Angiolillo, R Martorelli, M Giuman, AM Corda, D Artizzu (eds), La Sardegna romana e altomedioevale Storia e materiali, Delfino, Sassari, 20, 2017
66.Floris, P. Anziani, centenari e ultracentenari nella documentazione epigrafica della Sardegna romana (in press).
67.Zucca R. Ula Tirso. Un centro della Barbaria sarda, Dolianova, 1999
68.Farre C. Geografia epigrafica delle aree interne della Provincia Sardinia, Sandhi, Ortacesus, 2016
69.Cossu AM. Iscrizioni di età romana dal Barigadu In: A Mastino, P Ruggeri (eds), L’Africa romana Atti del X convegno di studio (Oristano, 11–13 dicembre 1992), Archivio Fotografico Sardo, Sassari, 9, 1994, pp 992–995
70.Ruggeri P. Aùstis: l'epitafio di Cn(aeus) Coruncanius Faustinus. Nuovo Bullettino Archeologico Sardo IV, 1987–1992; nrr. 1, 2, 5. [Google Scholar]
71.Zucca R. Neoneli–Leunelli. Dalla civitas Barbariae all'età contemporanea, Comune di Neoneli, Bolotana, 7, 2003, pp 38–40
72.Porrà F. Un nuovo apporto all’onomastica romana della Sardegna. Annali della Facoltà di Magistero della Università di Cagliari 9, 1985, pp 39–41 [Google Scholar]
73.Floris P. Riflessioni sulle cupae di Karales In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 127–155
74.Farre C. Dai cippi alle cupae: osservazioni sull’evoluzione dei supporti funerari nella Sardegna centro-occidentale. In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 89–104
75.Mastino A, Zucca R. Le cupae della Sardegna, con inediti del Barigadu (sul fiume Tirso). In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 181–200
76.Floris P. 2005: Le iscrizioni funerarie pagane di Karales, Edizioni AV, Cagliari
77.Lassère J‒M. Manuel d’épigraphie romaine, Picard, Paris, 2005
78.Corda AM. Vallermosa: la romanizzazione del territorio. In: Villa Hermosa. Storia e identità di un luogo, Comune di Vallermosa, Vallermosa, 2007, pp 68–69.
79.Frézouls E. Les survivances indigènes dans l'onomastique africaine. In: A Mastino (ed), L'Africa romana. Atti del VII convegno di studio, Sassari (15–17 dicembre 1989), Edizioni Gallizzi, Sassari, 1990
80.Floris P. Considerazioni su alcune questioni biometriche femminili della Sardegna romana. In: Sguardi contemporanei. Studi multidiscliplinari in onore di Francesco Atzeni, a cura di A Floris, L Lecis, I Macchiarella, C Tasca, Morelacchi Editore, Perugia, 2019, pp 151–163.

PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r001

Decision Letter 0

David Caramelli

10 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-23736

Does the Longevity of Sardinian Population Date Back to Roman Times? A Review of the Available Evidence

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pes,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 25 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

David Caramelli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study reviews the literature in order to answer to the question if longevity of the Sardinian population dates back to Roman times.

The authors consider the characteristics and limits of different kinds of sources available for the Roman world (literary sources, juridical evidence, epigraphic evidence, papyrological evidence, model life tables, archeological evidence and causes of death) and then afford the analysis of data on mortality in Roman Sardinia.

My major concern is about the structure of the article, that does not correspond to the criteria for publication of the journal, as it is not a systematic review, nor it presents the results of original research.

However, the topic is potentially interesting for the readers of PLoS one.

My suggestion is to revise the article, slighthly changing the introduction on the evidence available for the Roman age (as suggested below) and realizing a systematic review of the literature on mortality in Roman Sardinia (according to PRISMA guidelines, http://prisma-statement.org/).

General comments

In the introduction, the authors should add a comparative, synthetic comment of the contribution given by the different sources to the knowledge of mortality in the Roman era. Otherwise, they risk to simply confirm in their conclusions (“Our results indicate that […] there is not enough evidence to formulate definitive conclusions ...”) what is already described in the introduction (“the usefulness of literary and epigraphic sources […] is today almost universally denied”, or “most scholars consider funerary texts unreliable for studies on mortality rate and life expectancy”).

I also suggest to introduce a comment on the utility of the information on longevity in the Roman age in order to better understand the environmental and biological correlates of longevity in the present Sardinian population. At this purpose, the discussion should include a comment on the diffusion of the Roman people in the different Sardinian subregions.

Furthermore, the anthropological literature should be considered with much greater attention.

Detailed comments

Abstract

> The abstract describes the background and the conclusions, without giving any information on the methods and the results of the study.

Introduction

> I suggest to remove “in the last quarter of the twenty century” as the information is already clearly present in the same or near sentences.

Mortality during the Roman empire

> The sentence “The scientific and methodological […] the use of sources“ is not very clear to me and should be reformulated.

Literary sources

>The use of multiple words to define concepts (e.g., rhetorical‒philosophical, technical‒statistical, anecdotal/exemplary/wondrous) is sligthly redundant.

> The comment “Even living aside […] scrutinized is unknown” could be better placed at the end of the chapter and joined to the other comment “It can be concluded that Roman age writers perceived longevity cases as extraordinary events and not as a daily reality”. However, the latter observation is not very informative.

Juridical evidence

> The statement “However, Ulpian's Table […] other pre-modern populations” is probably related to the following sentence. In such a case, please add the reference n.16.

Epigraphic evidence

> This chapter does not include demographic information, as done in the previous ones.

> Furthermore, I am quite surprised about the strength of the statement on the inadequacy of funeral inscriptions as sources for demographic research. Although the imprecision of age data undoubtedly hampers statistical analyses, such data can give qualitative information on the age structure of the population, that can be valuable in the absence of more accurate data. Indeed, age heaping is a phenomenon present in our days too (see for example studies on nutritional status in children not registered at birth), and it is considered in order to manage and save the related information.

Papyrological evidence

> If possible, please add some information on mortality or longevity, as in the first paragraphs.

Archeological evidence

> This chapter does not consider the great body of information on demographic, biological and pathological characteristics furnished by the anthropological literature.

> A comment on the imprecision of age of death assessment would be appropriate.

The comparative approach: Model Life Tables

> Please discuss why the Model West Level 3 Female tables (Table 1) are “the most often quoted in the literature” and if this is true also for studies on longevity, where men and women generally show a different trend (with the exception of eastern Sardinia).

Causes of death

> Here, again, the anthropological literature is underscored. Just as an example, consider the article by Minozzi et al. “Palaeopathology of Human Remains from the Roman Imperial Age” (https://doi.org/10.1159/000338097). Some other information, specifically referred to Sardinia, can be retrieved in the book authored by Sanna (Il popolamento della Sardegna e l'origine dei sardi; CUEC, 2006) and in the online archive http://www.anthroponet.it/.

> The conclusions (“in conclusion […] beyond the purposes of this paper”) should be placed under a dedicated chapter summarizing the relevance of the different sources in a comparative way. I also suggest to add a table with the key information deriving from or related to the sources previously discussed.

Mortality in Roman Sardinia

> In this section, the authors refer to a recent review of one of them, mentioned as forthcoming within the references (Floris, P. Forthcoming: Anziani, centenari e ultracentenari nella documentazione epigrafica della Sardegna romana) and it is unclear if the figure 1 is original or comes from that article. The information on the graphic elaboration included in the legend can be given in the appropriate section on authors' contribution.

> The authors should justify why, in their opinion, “epigraphic evidence suggests different trends in the commemorative practices […] than in Turris Libisonis. “

> The sentence “it must be remembered that […], the funerary altar […] was found in the 1950s” should be changed. In fact, it seems that the important fact to be remembered is the year of the altar discovery.

Conclusions

> These conclusions are only related to the last chapter and not consider the first part of the article, that are summarized before. The previous conclusions should be moved here or the title changed.

Figures 2-4. Just a remind that these figures will be shared under an open access licence.

References

> References should be written according to the “Vancouver” style used by PLOS. Actually some references are footnotes.

Reviewer #2: Manuscript "Does the Longevity of Sardinian Population Date Back to Roman Times? A Review of the Available Evidence" in the first part (maybe a little too long compared with the rest) describes the source and the limits of method for estimating the age of death in Roman period, then it focuses the attention on Sardinia Case.

Authors made an important review work, but in my opinion the manuscript needs major revision before publishing.

The most important point is the structure of the manuscript. I suggest to re-organize the manuscript following the structure indicated by Plos One: introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, and eventually Conclusion. Any other paragraphs should be included in the previous cited as subparagraphs.

Second page:

- Financial Disclosure: The are no findings for this study. Maybe authors mean There is no funding.

- Re-organize the abstract, highlighting the aim of the paper and the type of research (review)

Introduction: In my opinion would be useful to write in the introduction all the possible source or statistical estimation for the age of death, while in material and method author should cite the source they consulted for the bibliography (database and keywords, library), since the manuscript is a review of the available literature, we must be sure to have all the available literature.

In Introduction:

- When it is possible, it would appreciate to specify, when authors cite Romans, if is know which part of Roman Empire they are speaking about;

- When authors write that there is a trend to interpret the longevity observed nowadays in Sardinia as a historical extension of intrinsic characteristics of this population documentable in the Roman era, they should cite the source, who gave this interpretation?

The last part of “Causes of death” does not fit well in that paragraph, I suggest to move it in the previous one.

In “mortality of Roman Sardinian”:

- when mortality rates for malaria is cited, author should specify the value;

- Author cite the age of death of Sardinia compared with the one of the city of Rome, are there other data from other part of Roman Empire?

- The sentence: “only three cases are not statistically very significant” is scientifically wrong: a statistic can be significant, highly significant or nor significant, other adjectives are not accepted. Authors could write for example 3 cases not have statistical relevance or similar;

- Only study based on epitaph are mentioned, I presume no other source are available. Authors should specify it.

English must be revised by a native speaker experienced in the field.

Figures: Despite being fascinating, in my opinion figures do not add value or information to the manuscript. Maybe authors could limit the number of figures.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0245006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0

28 Nov 2020

Authors’s responses to Reviewers

Reviewer #1: This study reviews the literature in order to answer to the question if longevity of the Sardinian population dates back to Roman times.

Reply: the structure of the article was completely reshaped according to the Plos ONE criteria and the title was changed as follows “Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence?”

However, the topic is potentially interesting for the readers of PLoS one.

Reply: we have done so.

General comments

Furthermore, the anthropological literature should be considered with much greater attention.

Reply: in the revised version of the manuscript, we moved the second paragraph to the introduction, and added a supplement of the literature on mortality in the Roman Empire that we consider exhaustive (Page 4, lines 74-77; page 5, lines 81-84). In the introduction, the diversity of opinions of various authors on the duration of life in Roman times was emphasized, thus avoiding a predictable statement in the conclusions (Page 4, lines 66-77). In particular, the prevalent negative opinion of scholars about the reliability of epigraphic, funerary sources, etc. for the estimate of mortality was not anticipated in the introduction but developed from the critical analysis of evidence. The discussion includes a comment on the different extension of Romanization in the various subregions of Sardinia (Page 19, lines 407-415).

Detailed comments

Abstract

> The abstract describes the background and the conclusions, without giving any information on the methods and the results of the study.

Reply: methods and results were added to the abstract, that was deeply changed.

Introduction

> I suggest to remove “in the last quarter of the twenty century” as the information is already clearly present in the same or near sentences.

Reply: we did it.

Mortality during the Roman empire

> The sentence “The scientific and methodological […] the use of sources“ is not very clear to me and should be reformulated.

Reply: the sentence was simplified as follows: “Modern demographic research on Antiquity owes much to the analyses conducted by Karl Julius Beloch towards the end of the 19th century [11], and by Keith Hopkins since the 1960s [12, 13]. Current developments in this field go on, roughly, since 1980 and are animated by lively discussions on methodology and the use of sources [14-19].” Page 4, lines 66-69.

Literary sources

>The use of multiple words to define concepts (e.g., rhetorical‒philosophical, technical‒statistical, anecdotal/exemplary/wondrous) is sligthly redundant.

Reply: the use of multiple words is a common expression in the literary field and may refer to complementary aspects of the ancient world. In the revised version we tried to avoid the combination of these terms using the symbol “/” by inserting a conjunction. The word “technical / statistical” was eliminated. See, for instance, page 6, lines 109 and 112.

Reply: in the revised manuscript the last sentence was suppressed.

Juridical evidence

> The statement “However, Ulpian's Table […] other pre-modern populations” is probably related to the following sentence. In such a case, please add the reference n.16.

Reply: we did it.

Epigraphic evidence

> This chapter does not include demographic information, as done in the previous ones.

Reply: in the revised manuscript we added a paragraph on page 8, lines 161-166.

Reply: in the revised manuscript the sentence was suppressed, although the majority of scholars in the field deny the utility of epigraphic data for demographics purposes.

Papyrological evidence

> If possible, please add some information on mortality or longevity, as in the first paragraphs.

Reply: thanks for the kind observation. Data on life expectancy were added to the papyrological section (Page 10, line 205).

Archeological evidence

> This chapter does not consider the great body of information on demographic, biological and pathological characteristics furnished by the anthropological literature.

> A comment on the imprecision of age of death assessment would be appropriate.

Reply: the archaeological evidence section is now more informative and some comments were added (Page 10, lines 222-223; page 11, lines 224-232).

The comparative approach: Model Life Tables

Reply: the main reason for the utility of Model West Level 3 Female is that it fits empirical data better than any other. In the literature this model was adopted irrespectively of sex because in pre-modern societies such as ancient Romans the survival of men and women was similar. A sizable gender gap in survival is appreciable only in populations characterised by some evidence of “longevity”, e.g. survive beyond the age of 60. For these reasons the Model West Level 3 Female cannot be applied to study longevity.

Causes of death

Reply: information on the article by Minozzi et al. and the data for the book of Sanna were included in the Mortality in Roman Sardinia section (Page 11, lines 224-229) and, in general, the anthropological literature was expanded. As regard the table, in Sardinia there are only epigraphic documentation making no possible to compare the relevance of the different sources (Page 11, lines 227-229).

Mortality in Roman Sardinia

> In this section, the authors refer to a recent review of one of them, mentioned as forthcoming within the references (Floris, P. Anziani, centenari e ultracentenari nella documentazione epigrafica della Sardegna romana, in press) and it is unclear if the figure 1 is original or comes from that article. The information on the graphic elaboration included in the legend can be given in the appropriate section on authors' contribution.

Reply: in the revised manuscript, figures 2-4 were suppressed. Only figure 1 was retained.

> The authors should justify why, in their opinion, “epigraphic evidence suggests different trends in the commemorative practices […] than in Turris Libisonis.”

Reply: as for the different commemorative practices, the answer can be found in the specific section of the revised manuscript (Page 19, lines 407-415)

Reply: in the revised version the sentence was removed.

Conclusions

Reply: we did it.

Figures 2-4. Just a remind that these figures will be shared under an open access licence.

Reply: see above (figures 2-4 have been suppressed).

References

> References should be written according to the “Vancouver” style used by PLOS. Actually some references are footnotes.

Reply: in the revised manuscript some quotations from ancient writers have been moved from the reference list directly into the text, within parentheses. In addition, references have been modified according to the Vancouver style.

Reviewer #2: Manuscript "Does the Longevity of the Sardinian Population Date Back to Roman Times? A Review of the Available Evidence" in the first part (maybe a little too long compared with the rest) describes the source and the limits of method for estimating the age of death in Roman period, then it focuses the attention on Sardinia Case.

Authors made an important review work, but in my opinion the manuscript needs major revision before publishing.

Reply: In the revised version, the structure of the manuscript was completely changed according to the instruction of Plos ONE, although the historical nature of the article does not completely fit into a conventional format.

Second page:

- Financial Disclosure: The are no findings for this study. Maybe authors mean There is no funding.

- Re-organize the abstract, highlighting the aim of the paper and the type of research (review)

Reply: The misspelling relating to funding has been corrected. In the abstract it was clearly stated that the paper is a review.

In Introduction:

- When it is possible, it would appreciate to specify, when authors cite Romans, if is know which part of Roman Empire they are speaking about;

Reply: a detailed methodology for source retrieval has been described in the material and methods section (Page 5, lines 91-100; page 6, lines 101-104).

When available, regions of the Roman Empire are specified.

In the present work now is better specified that we tested the hypothesis that the extreme longevity detected in some areas of Sardinia was a phenomenon already present in Roman times, as suggested by the Rowland’s report (Page 4, lines 60-65).

The last part of “Causes of death” does not fit well in that paragraph, I suggest to move it in the previous one.

Reply: we did it.

In “mortality of Roman Sardinian”:

- when mortality rates for malaria is cited, author should specify the value;

Reply: No reliable death rate from malaria is available for Roman Italy as reported in the added reference no. 62.

- Author cite the age of death of Sardinia compared with the one of the city of Rome, are there other data from other part of Roman Empire?

Reply: the average age at death of Sardinia in comparison with other parts of the Empire was included (Page 8, lines 161-168).

Reply: The sentence on statistical significance was changed according to the reviewer's suggestion.

- Only study based on epitaph are mentioned, I presume no other source are available. Authors should specify it.

Reply: this was specified on page 2, line 28-29; page 18, lines 396-398; page 19, lines 421-424.

English must be revised by a native speaker experienced in the field.

Reply: a certification by an English proof-reading service was attached as Supporting Information files.

Figures: Despite being fascinating, in my opinion figures do not add value or information to the manuscript. Maybe authors could limit the number of figures.

Reply: as suggested by the reviewer, figures 2-4 have been suppressed.

PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r003

Decision Letter 1

David Caramelli

14 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-23736R1

Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence?”

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pes,

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

David Caramelli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: I have read the article with renewed interest and believe that it is significantly improved.

The authors have revised the manuscript according to suggestions. However, revision is still necessary, as detailed below.

I understand the difficulty to completely adapt the manuscript to the PRISMA guidelines. However, something more can be done.

Within the section Materials and methods (Search strategy and study selection) more information should be given (e.g., when the bibliographic search was performed, the years considered, the search query). Within the Results, if not a classical flow diagram, the numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions should be added. Also, a brief description of the characteristics of selected studies is necessary. For example, the information included in the abstract “For Roman Sardinia, only funerary epitaphs were retrieved” should result evident from this section. Indeed, it is unclear if the studies discussed in pages 6-18 have been selected for the review or if they are mentioned for comparison. Hence, it is unclear if the Results are overlapped with the Discussion.

Detailed comments

Lines 63-65. This sentence “On this basis […] of this population” is related to the aim ot the review and should be joined with it (lines 85-87).

Line 179. I do not see the reason to write median under quotes. Please explain.

In general. The authors use many terms when refer to the analysis of skeletal remains (scientific archaeology, molecular biology, paleodemography), but strangely never “anthropology” (or skeletal anthropology, or physical anthropology) were the study of such topic is central.

Lines 407-415. According to the authors' answer, this text “includes a comment on the different extension of Romanization in the various subregions of Sardinia”. However I dont see where.

Fig 1. Distribution of Sardinian epitaphs. Please add in the legend and possibly in the figure the information on the northern location of Turris Lisbonis. The same at line 319.

Reviewer #2: The authors addressed all the reviews I suggested and the manuscript is now greatly improved, so it should be considerated accept.

I just sugget to modify some little points more:

- In Introduction: line 70, I suggest to eliminate recently, because a research published in 2007 is not recently in my opinion;

- In Introduction: line 81: the authors name Frier, never mentioned before, I suggest to add a reference here;

- In Discussione, line 393: authors wrote "Although he hypothesis". It is not clear who is he, please substitute with the name.

In Discussione line 408: please add a comma after because, or eliminate the comma after world in line 409

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0245006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1

18 Dec 2020

Authors’s responses to Reviewers

Reviewer #1: I have read the article with renewed interest and believe that it is significantly improved.

The authors have revised the manuscript according to suggestions. However, revision is still necessary, as detailed below.

I understand the difficulty to completely adapt the manuscript to the PRISMA guidelines. However, something more can be done.

Reply: in the revised version of the manuscript the section on materials and methods has been enriched with new information to facilitate the reader in understanding the search strategy. In particular, the following paragraph has been added “In the preliminary screening we were able to retrieve hundreds of articles, books and ancient inscriptions relating to Roman Sardinia. Articles quoting Sardinia marginally in the context of the Roman Empire, or not providing specific demographic data, were excluded from the analysis. Similarly, anthropological articles, reporting findings on skeletal remains in Sardinia were excluded if they did not encompass the Roman era, or the age of the bones were not provided. Likewise, articles on Roman epigraphy that did not mention Sardinia were excluded. Following the preliminary screening only funerary epitaphs were retrieved for Roman Sardinia, including the texts of all 390 Latin funerary inscriptions reported by Rowland [9]. Moreover, articles of historical demography, from the end of the 19th century to the present, reporting data on the average lifespan in Sardinia compared to other regions of the Roman Empire were considered eligible and used to discuss similarities and differences.” (page 6, lines 116-119; page 6, lines 120-126).

On page 5, line 94 it was specified that the search had no time limitation.

Although some articles retrieved from the search did not specifically deal with Sardinia, they were nevertheless cited in the text to clarify some peculiar aspects of demography in Roman times.

According with the manuscript structure of PLOS One Journal, Results and Discussion was combined in one section (page 6, line 115).

Detailed comments

Lines 63-65. This sentence “On this basis […] of this population” is related to the aim ot the review and should be joined with it (lines 85-87).

Reply: Thanks for the suggestion. The sentence has been shortened and moved to the last paragraph of the introduction (page 5, line 82).

Line 179. I do not see the reason to write median under quotes. Please explain.

Reply: Sorry for the mistake, in the revised version the quotes have been suppressed (page 10, line 200).

Reply: as suggested by the reviewer, in the revised manuscript the term “anthropology” has been added accordingly, and now there are 5 occurrences of the word, included one in the abstract (page 2, line 24; page 5, line 90; page 11, line 235; page 12, lines 244 and 249).

Lines 407-415. According to the authors' answer, this text “includes a comment on the different extension of Romanization in the various subregions of Sardinia”. However I dont see where.

Reply: A new sentence was added: “A factor that might have played a confounding role, and which must be taken into account in deciphering the demography of Sardinia in early centuries CE, is also the different extension of the Romanization on the island, clearly documented for coastal areas and inland plains, while the central mountainous areas remained largely exempt due to the anti-Roman resistance of indigenous populations (Figure 1 A)” (page 19, lines 415-419).

Fig 1. Distribution of Sardinian epitaphs. Please add in the legend and possibly in the figure the information on the northern location of Turris Lisbonis. The same at line 319.

Reply: a new figure 1 has been prepared, in which a stylized geographical map has been added displaying (i) the extension of Romanized Sardinia compared to areas relatively less influenced by the Roman rule; (ii) the location of Turris Libisonis in the North of 'island, and (iii) the site of the funerary findings relating to alleged ultra-centenarians and nonagenarians.

Reviewer #2: The authors addressed all the reviews I suggested and the manuscript is now greatly improved, so it should be considerated accept.

Reply: We appreciate your feedback and evaluation very much.

I just sugget to modify some little points more:

- In Introduction: line 70, I suggest to eliminate recently, because a research published in 2007 is not recently in my opinion;

Reply: We agree with the reviewer, and in the revised manuscript the adverb “recently” has been deleted.

- In Introduction: line 81: the authors name Frier, never mentioned before, I suggest to add a reference here;

Reply: The reference to Frier has been quoted (page 5, line 78).

- In Discussione, line 393: authors wrote "Although he hypothesis". It is not clear who is he, please substitute with the name.

Reply: Sorry for the typo about "he hypothesis"; in the revised version it has been corrected with “the hypothesis” (page 19, line 413).

In Discussione line 408: please add a comma after because, or eliminate the comma after world in line 409

Reply: the comma was moved (page 20, line 432).

We hope the revised manuscript will be now suitable for publication in the PLOS One Journal

Sincerely and respectfully

Giovanni Mario Pes, MD, PhD

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Sperimentali

University of Sassari

Viale San Pietro no. 43

I-07100 Sassari

Italy

Phone: +39 347 4539532

E-mail: gmpes@uniss.it

PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r005

Decision Letter 2

David Caramelli

21 Dec 2020

Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence?”

PONE-D-20-23736R2

Dear Dr. Pes,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

David Caramelli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245006.r006

Acceptance letter

David Caramelli

26 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-23736R2

Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence

Dear Dr. Pes:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor David Caramelli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Checklist. PRISMA checklist.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(64.5KB, doc)}

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

[pone.0245006.ref001] 1.Pes GM. The Sardinian Centenarian Study. Research Workshop on “Genes, Genealogy and Longevity”; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft: Montpellier, France, 1999.

[pone.0245006.ref002] 2.Poulain M, Pes GM, Grasland C, Carru C, Ferrucci L, Baggio G, et al. Identification of a geographic area characterized by extreme longevity in the Sardinia island: the AKEA study. Exp Gerontol 2004;39:1423‒1429. 10.1016/j.exger.2004.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref003] 3.Pes GM, Poulain M. Blue zones In: Pachana NA(ed) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, Springer, Singapore: 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref004] 4.Poulain M, Buettner D, Pes GM. Blue Zones. In: Rattan SIS(Ed), Encyclopedia of Biomedical Gerontology Elsevier, Academic Press, 2020, vol 1, pp 296–305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref005] 5.Caselli G, Pozzi L, Vaupel JW, Deiana L, Pes GM, Carru C, et al. Family clustering in Sardinian longevity: a genealogical approach. Exp Gerontol 2006;41:727‒736. 10.1016/j.exger.2006.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref006] 6.Poulain M, Pes GM, Salaris L. A population where men live as long as women: Villagrande Strisaili, Sardinia. J Aging Res 2011;2011:153756 10.4061/2011/153756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref007] 7.Caselli G, Lapucci E, Lipsi RM, Pozzi L, Baggio G, Carru C, et al. Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality. Demographic Research 2014;31:1275–1296. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.42 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref008] 8.Pes GM, Errigo A, Tedde P, Dore MP. Sociodemographic, clinical and functional profile of nonagenarians from two areas of Sardinia characterized by distinct longevity levels Rejuvenation Res. 2020;23:341–348. 10.1089/rej.2018.2129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref009] 9.Rowland RJ. Mortality in Roman Sardinia. Studi Sardi 1971. –72; 22: 359–368. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref010] 10.Corda AM. Indagine biometrica sulle iscrizioni latine della Sardegna. Valutazione dei dati, Cagliari 1995 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref011] 11.Beloch KJ. Die Bevölkerung der griechisch-römischen Welt. Leipzig, Duncker and Humblot, 1886 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref012] 12.Hopkins K. On the probable age structure of the Roman population. Population studies 1966; 20: 245–264. 10.1080/00324728.1966.10406097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref013] 13.Hopkins K. Graveyards for Historians In: F Hinard (ed), La mort, les morts et l’au-delà, Actes du Colloque (Caen 20–22 Novembre 1985), Caen 1987, pp. 113–126.

[pone.0245006.ref014] 14.Parkin TG. Demography and Roman Society. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University. Press, 1992 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref015] 15.Corvisier J-N and Suder W. La population de l’antiquité classique. Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 2000. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00132.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref016] 16.Frier BW. Demography. In: Bowman AK, Garnsey P, and Rathbone D (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History XI: The High Empire, AD 70–192, Cambridge, 2000, pp 787–816.

[pone.0245006.ref017] 17.Scheidel W. Progress and Problems in Roman Demography. In: W Scheidel (ed), Debating Roman Demography, Brill, Leiden, 2001, pp 1–81.

[pone.0245006.ref018] 18.Holleran C and Pudsey A. Introduction studies in ancient historical demography In: C Holleran, A Pudsey (edS), Demography and the Graeco-Roman World: New Insights and Approaches, Cambridge, 2011, pp 1–7

[pone.0245006.ref019] 19.Hin S. 2015: Ancient Demography In: Clayman D L (ed) Oxford Bibliographies in Classics New York: Oxford University Press; Online publication. 10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref020] 20.Scheidel W. Epigraphy and Demography: Birth, Marriage, Family, and Death. Version 1.0, 2007. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrncom/abstract=1096436

[pone.0245006.ref021] 21.Scheidel W. Roman Age Structure: Evidence and Models. The Journal of Roman Studies 2001;91:1–26. 10.2307/3184767 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref022] 22.Scheidel W. Emperors, aristocrats, and the Grim Reaper: towards a demographic profile of the Roman elite. Class Quarterly. 1999;49:254–281. 10.1093/cq/49.1.254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref023] 23.Jongman W.M. Demography of the Ancient Roman World. In: Smith C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology Springer, New York, NY, 2014. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1446 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref024] 24.Scheidel W. Demography. In: Scheidel W, Morris I and Saller RP (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp 38–86 10.1007/s00292-007-0915-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref025] 25.Phlegon, Opuscula de rebus mirabilibus et de longaevis. A Stramaglia (ed), Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Berlin—New York, De Gruyter, 2011 pp 61–92. 10.1515/9783110239058 [DOI]

[pone.0245006.ref026] 26.2 ad leg Vig Hered: Dig XXXV, 2, 68 pr, in: Watson A. The Digest of Justinian. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.

[pone.0245006.ref027] 27.Frier BW. Roman Life Expectancy: Ulpian’s Evidence. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 1982; 86: 213–251. 10.2307/311195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref028] 28.Coale AJ and Demeny P. Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Academic Press, 2nd edition, New York, 1983 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref029] 29.Woods R. Ancient and Early Modern Mortality: Experience and Understanding. Economic History Review, 2007; 60: 373–399. 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2006.00367.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref030] 30.Harkness AG. Age at marriage and at death in the Roman Empire. Trans. Amer. Philol. Assoc. 1896; 27, p. 66. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref031] 31.Szilágiy J. Beiträge zur Statistik der Sterblichkeit in den westeuropäischen Provinzen des römischen Imperiums, Acta Arch Hung 1961;13:125–155 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref032] 32.Szilágiy J. Beiträge zur Statistik der Sterblichkeit in der Illyrischen Provinzgruppe und in Norditalien (Gallia Padana), Acta Arch Hung 1962;14:297–396 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref033] 33.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den Städten Mittel- und Süd-Italiens sowie in Hispanien (in der römischen Kaiserzeit), Acta Arch Hung 1963;15:129–224 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref034] 34.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen I, Acta Arch Hung 1965;17:309–334 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref035] 35.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen II, Acta Arch Hung 1966;18:235–377 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref036] 36.Szilágiy J. Die Sterblichkeit in den nordafrikanischen Provinzen III, Acta Arch Hung 1967;19:25–59 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref037] 37.Duncan-Jones RP. 1990: Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 96–100. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref038] 38.Saller RP. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp 13–15. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref039] 39.Hin S. The Demography of Roman Italy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref040] 40.Duncan-Jones RP. Age-Rounding, Illiteracy and Social Differentiation in the Roman Empire. Chiron 1977; 7: 333–353 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref041] 41.Duncan-Jones RP. Age-Rounding in Greco-Roman Egypt. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 1979;33:169–177 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref042] 42.Parkin TG. Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2003 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref043] 43.Le Teuff B. Les recensements augustéens, aux origines de l’EmpirE Pallas: Revue d’Études Antiques 2014; 96: 75–90. 10.4000/pallas.1179 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref044] 44.Bagnall RS and Frier BW. The Demography of Roman Egypt 2nd ed, Cambridge, 2006

[pone.0245006.ref045] 45.Scheidel W. Death on the Nile: Disease and the Demography of Roman Egypt, Leiden, 2001

[pone.0245006.ref046] 46.Buchet L and Séguy I. 2002: La paléodémographie aujourd’hui: bilan et perspectives. Annales de démographie historique. 1: 161–212. 10.3917/adh.103.0161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref047] 47.Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW. Paleodemography: Age Distributions from Skel et al. Samples Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. 10.1002/ajpa.10000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref048] 48.Caussinus H, Courgeau D. Estimer l'âge sans le mesurer en paléodémographie. Population 2010; 65: 117–145. 10.3917/popu.1001.0117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref049] 49.Caussinus H, Courgeau D. A new method for estimating age-at-death Structure In: Séguy I, Buchet L (eds) Handbook of palaeodemography Springer, Dordrecht, 2013, pp 255–286.

[pone.0245006.ref050] 50.Lassère J‒ M. Ubique populus. Peuplement et mouvements de population dans l'Afrique romaine de la chute de Carthage à la fin de la dynastie des Sévères (146 av. J. C. - 235 ap J. C.). Paris: Ed du CNRS, 1977 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref051] 51.Minozzi S, Catalano P, Caldarini C, Fornaciari G. Palaeopathology of human remains from the Roman Imperial Age. Pathobiology. 2012;79(5):268–283. 10.1159/000338097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref052] 52.Sanna E. Il popolamento della Sardegna e le origini dei sardi. CUEC Editrice, 2006. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref053] 53.Frier BW. Roman Life Expectancy: the Pannonian Evidence. Phoenix 1983; 37: 328–344. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref054] 54.Lo Cascio E. (ed). L’impatto della “Peste Antonina”, Edipuglia, Bari, 2007

[pone.0245006.ref055] 55.Harper K. Il destino di Roma. Clima, epidemie e la fine di un impero. Einaudi, Torino, 2019, pp 125–147, 174–185.

[pone.0245006.ref056] 56.Tognotti E. La malaria in Sardegna: per una storia del paludismo nel Mezzogiorno (1880–1950), Franco Angeli, Milano, 1996

[pone.0245006.ref057] 57.Sallares R. Malaria and Rome. A History of malaria in Ancient Italy, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York, 93, 2002, pp 123–140. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref058] 58.Tognotti E. The Spread of malaria in Sardinia: An Historical Perspective In: LS Greene, ME Danubio (eds), Adaptation to malaria: The Interaction of Biology and Culture, Gordon and Breach Pub, Amsterdam, 1997, pp 237–247.

[pone.0245006.ref059] 59.Scheidel W. Libitina’s Bitter Gains: Seasonal Mortality and Endemic Disease in the Ancient City of Rome. Ancient Society 1994; 25: 151–175. 10.2143/AS.25.0.2005846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref060] 60.Scheidel W. Measuring Sex, Age and Death in the Roman Empire: Explorations in Ancient Demography. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Portsmouth, 1996 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref061] 61.Shaw BD. Seasons of Death: Aspects of Mortality in Imperial Rome. The Journal of Roman Studies 1996; 86: 100–138. 10.2307/300425 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref062] 62.Marciniak S, Prowse TL, Herring DA, Klunk J, Kuch M, Duggan AT, et al. Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 1st-2nd century CE southern Italy. Curr Biol. 2016;26(23):R1220–R1222. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref063] 63.Sallares R. Ecology In: Scheidel W, Morris Iand Saller RP (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp 15–37. 10.1186/1472-6785-7-15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref064] 64.Meloni P. La Sardegna romana. Ilisso, Nuoro, 2012, 90, pp 298–299. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref065] 65.Mastino A. La Sardegna al centro del Mediterraneo. In S Angiolillo, R Martorelli, M Giuman, AM Corda, D Artizzu (eds), La Sardegna romana e altomedioevale Storia e materiali, Delfino, Sassari, 20, 2017

[pone.0245006.ref066] 66.Floris, P. Anziani, centenari e ultracentenari nella documentazione epigrafica della Sardegna romana (in press).

[pone.0245006.ref067] 67.Zucca R. Ula Tirso. Un centro della Barbaria sarda, Dolianova, 1999

[pone.0245006.ref068] 68.Farre C. Geografia epigrafica delle aree interne della Provincia Sardinia, Sandhi, Ortacesus, 2016

[pone.0245006.ref069] 69.Cossu AM. Iscrizioni di età romana dal Barigadu In: A Mastino, P Ruggeri (eds), L’Africa romana Atti del X convegno di studio (Oristano, 11–13 dicembre 1992), Archivio Fotografico Sardo, Sassari, 9, 1994, pp 992–995

[pone.0245006.ref070] 70.Ruggeri P. Aùstis: l'epitafio di Cn(aeus) Coruncanius Faustinus. Nuovo Bullettino Archeologico Sardo IV, 1987–1992; nrr. 1, 2, 5. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref071] 71.Zucca R. Neoneli–Leunelli. Dalla civitas Barbariae all'età contemporanea, Comune di Neoneli, Bolotana, 7, 2003, pp 38–40

[pone.0245006.ref072] 72.Porrà F. Un nuovo apporto all’onomastica romana della Sardegna. Annali della Facoltà di Magistero della Università di Cagliari 9, 1985, pp 39–41 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0245006.ref073] 73.Floris P. Riflessioni sulle cupae di Karales In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 127–155

[pone.0245006.ref074] 74.Farre C. Dai cippi alle cupae: osservazioni sull’evoluzione dei supporti funerari nella Sardegna centro-occidentale. In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 89–104

[pone.0245006.ref075] 75.Mastino A, Zucca R. Le cupae della Sardegna, con inediti del Barigadu (sul fiume Tirso). In: G Baratta (ed), CVPAE Riletture e novità, Fratelli Lega Editori, Faenza, 2018, pp 181–200

[pone.0245006.ref076] 76.Floris P. 2005: Le iscrizioni funerarie pagane di Karales, Edizioni AV, Cagliari

[pone.0245006.ref077] 77.Lassère J‒M. Manuel d’épigraphie romaine, Picard, Paris, 2005

[pone.0245006.ref078] 78.Corda AM. Vallermosa: la romanizzazione del territorio. In: Villa Hermosa. Storia e identità di un luogo, Comune di Vallermosa, Vallermosa, 2007, pp 68–69.

[pone.0245006.ref079] 79.Frézouls E. Les survivances indigènes dans l'onomastique africaine. In: A Mastino (ed), L'Africa romana. Atti del VII convegno di studio, Sassari (15–17 dicembre 1989), Edizioni Gallizzi, Sassari, 1990

[pone.0245006.ref080] 80.Floris P. Considerazioni su alcune questioni biometriche femminili della Sardegna romana. In: Sguardi contemporanei. Studi multidiscliplinari in onore di Francesco Atzeni, a cura di A Floris, L Lecis, I Macchiarella, C Tasca, Morelacchi Editore, Perugia, 2019, pp 151–163.

PERMALINK

Does the longevity of the Sardinian population date back to Roman times? A comprehensive review of the available evidence

Piergiorgio Floris

Maria Pina Dore

Giovanni Mario Pes

Roles

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Search strategy and study selection

Results and discussion

Literary sources

Juridical evidence

Epigraphic evidence

Papyrological evidence

Archaeological evidence

The comparative approach: Model Life Tables

Mortality in Roman Sardinia

Fig 1. Distribution of Sardinian epitaphs.

Conclusion

Supporting information

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Decision Letter 0

David Caramelli

Roles

Author response to Decision Letter 0

Decision Letter 1

David Caramelli

Roles

Author response to Decision Letter 1

Decision Letter 2

David Caramelli

Roles

Acceptance letter

David Caramelli

Roles

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases