Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0244710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244710

Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: Benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

Glaucia Vilar-Pereira 1,#, Leda Castaño Barrios 1,#, Andrea Alice da Silva 2, Angelica Martins Batista 1, Isabela Resende Pereira 1, Otacílio Cruz Moreira 3, Constança Britto 3, Hílton Antônio Mata dos Santos 4,5, Joseli Lannes-Vieira 1,*
Editor: Laurence Coutellier6
PMCID: PMC7785227  PMID: 33400707

Abstract

Memory impairment has been associated with chronic Chagas disease (CD), a neglected tropical disease caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. In degenerative diseases, memory loss has been associated with increased oxidative stress, revealed as enhanced lipid peroxidation, in the cerebral cortex. Benznidazole (Bz), a trypanocidal drug efficient to reduce blood parasite load in the acute and chronic phases of infection, showed controversial effects on heart disease progression, the main clinical manifestation of CD. Here, we evaluated whether C57BL/6 mice infected with the Colombian type I T. cruzi strain present memory deficit assessed by (i) the novel object recognition task, (ii) the open field test and (iii) the aversive shock evoked test, at 120 days post infection (dpi). Next, we tested the effects of Bz therapy (25mg/Kg/day, for 30 consecutive days) on memory evocation, and tried to establish a relation between memory loss, parasite load and oxidative stress in the central nervous system (CNS). At 120 dpi, T. cruzi-infected mice showed memory impairment, compared with age-matched non-infected controls. Bz therapy (from 120 to 150 dpi) hampered the progression of habituation and aversive memory loss and, moreover, reversed memory impairment in object recognition. In vehicle-administered infected mice, neuroinflammation was absent albeit rare perivascular mononuclear cells were found in meninges and choroid plexus. Bz therapy abrogated the infiltration of the CNS by inflammatory cells, and reduced parasite load in hippocampus and cerebral cortex. At 120 and 150 dpi, lipid peroxidation was increased in the hippocampus and cortex tissue extracts. Notably, Bz therapy reduced levels of lipid peroxidation in the cerebral cortex. Therefore, in experimental chronic T. cruzi infection Bz therapy improved memory loss, in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the CNS, providing a new perspective to improve the quality of life of Chagas disease patients.

1. Introduction

Chagas disease (CD), a neglected tropical disease caused by the intracellular protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, afflicts 7–8 million people worldwide, most of them born and resident in Latin America [1]. The 2nd Consensus on Chagas disease estimates that 1.9 to 4.6 million individuals are infected with T. cruzi in Brazil. Ten to thirty years after infection, 20 to 30% of the patients progress to the cardiac form and 5 to 10% to the digestive form of CD [2]. Although a nervous form has been proposed by Carlos Chagas [3], the involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) in CD remains a matter of debate, mainly due to the lack of histopathological evidence [4, 5]. The non-recognition of a nervous form of CD hampers the adoption of more specific approaches, therapeutic strategies, and proposal of consensus to treat CD patients with behavioral alterations. Several studies described CNS impairment and behavioral alterations in chronic CD patients, attributed to left ventricular heart dysfunction, resulting in brain ischemia by hypoperfusion and/or embolic events [6]. A higher frequency of cognitive changes has been observed in patients with Chagas’ heart disease, when compared to patients with other cardiac diseases [7]. Post-mortem analysis of the CNS of CD patients showed cerebral and cerebellar atrophy without neuroinflammation [8]. Later, a computed tomography-based study revealed that the cerebral atrophy was independent of a structural cardiac disease, raising the idea that brain atrophy may represent the main anatomical substrate of cognitive impairment in CD patients [9]. An association between T. cruzi infection and cognitive abnormalities has been detected using the mini-mental state examination score to test elderly CD patients, which were not mediated by CD-related electrocardiographic alterations or digoxin medication [10]. Furthermore, cognitive dysfunction in chronic CD patients has been supported by deficiency in orientation, attention, non-verbal reasoning, information processing and learning [11, 12]. More import, memory loss has been described in chronic chagasic infection [1315].

Acute and chronically T. cruzi-infected rats present memory deficit [16]. Previously, we have described that in chronically T. cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice depressive-like behavior, anxiety and motor coordination disorder occur independently of sickness behavior and neuromuscular disorder [17, 18]. The present study was carried out to evaluate the presence of memory impairment in chronically T. cruzi-infected mice, using the (i) memory habituation test in the open field, (ii) novel object recognition memory task and (iii) aversive shock evoked test. Further, we challenged the contribution of parasite load in the CNS in behavioral alterations, treating chronically infected mice with the trypanocidal drug benznidazole (Bz). Lastly, we investigated the impact of chronic T. cruzi infection and Bz therapy on the grade of CNS tissue lipid peroxidation, a biomarker of oxidative stress associated with memory dysfunction in a neurodegenerative disorder [19, 20].

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Ethics statement

The experimental procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Brazilian National Council of Animal Experimentation (https://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/opencms/institucional/concea/) and the federal law 11.794 (8 October 2008). The Ethical Commission on Animal Use of Fiocruz and Oswaldo Cruz Institute/Fiocruz (licenses LW10/14 and L006/2018) approved all the procedures used in this study. All presented data were obtained from three independent experiments (Experiment Register Book #53 and Book #73, LBI/IOC-Fiocruz).

2.2 Experimental groups, infection by Trypanosoma cruzi, clinical follow-up and obtaining of brain tissue

Experimental check list is described in Author´s Check List (S1 Checklist). Details of experimental protocol are described in Fig 1. Female of 5-7-week-old mice (total of 92 mice) of the C57BL/6 strain (H-2b) were supplied by the Institute of Science and Technology in Biomodels (ICTB) of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) and housed in the Experimental Animal Facility (CEA-CF unit/IOC). Immediately after arrival, mice were housed in polypropylene cages with Pinus sawdust, randomically grouped in 3–5 mice per cage (experiment 1) or 5 mice per cage (experiments 2 and 3). The cages were maintained in microisolators, and mice received grain-based chaw food and water ad libitum. To minimize stress, mice were kept in adaptation for 10–14 days in a plastic igloo-enriched cage, in conditions free of specific pathogens, with light and noise control. After adaptation, mice were infected, treated, and analyzed according to the experimental protocols (Fig 1). Groups were composed as follow: Exp 1 –time point pre-therapy–analysis at 120 dpi (total 12 mice): non-infected controls (5 mice); T. cruzi-infected (7 mice); Exp 2 (total 40 mice): Part 1– time point pre-therapy (analysis at 120 dpi; total 15 mice)—non-infected controls (5 mice); T. cruzi-infected (10 mice); Part 2 –time point post-therapy (analysis at 150 dpi; total 25 mice)—non-infected controls (5 mice); vehicle-treated T. cruzi-infected (10 mice); Bz-treated T. cruzi-infected (10 mice); Exp 3 (total 40 mice): repetition of Exp 2. These groups were formed at mice arrival when cages were numbered and randomically sorted for the experimental infection, analysis at 120 dpi or for treatments. The experimental procedures were performed by different investigators (cited here as initials): housing, cage numbering and experimental group sorting: JLV and IRP; infection: JLV; drug treatments: IRP; mice follow-up and behavior tests: GVP and LCB; Tissue obtaining: GVP, LCB, IRP, JLV; Tissue analysis: AAS, AMB, OCM, HAMS; Data analysis: GVP, LCB, AAS, AMB, IRP, OCM, CB, HAMS, JLV.

Fig 1. Flow chart showing the experimental protocol with the number of animals used, death registered, and mice included in 3 (endpoint registered as “120 dpi”) or 2 (endpoint registered as “150 dpi”) independent experiments.

Fig 1

Mice were infected intraperitoneally with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain suspended in 0.2 mL of sterile saline buffer. The trypomastigote forms used were isolated from a chronic CD patient, currently classified as Type I T. cruzi strain [21] and kept by serial passages in C57BL/6 female mice each 35 days, at the Laboratory of Biology of the Interactions (LBI/IOC). Parasitemia was performed weekly, as previously described [22]. Weekly, death was recorded, and clinical signs analyzed. For clinical follow-up we evaluated external physical conditions (piloerection, apathy, prostration, mobility, posture, aggressive behavior, pain), and body weight loss (which reveals loss of appetite) was assessed using a rodent weighing scale (Sartorius scale, ED623S-OCE, USA). Negative parasitemia (35 to 45 dpi) and any death outside of planned euthanasia or humane endpoints were the exclusion criteria. The humane endpoints criteria were body weight loss (≥ 30% of the initial weight), injuries from fights, pain, posture, ataxia and immobility. According to the experimental protocols, mice were euthanized at the endpoints (120 and 150 dpi), using CO2 inhalation in an appropriate chamber allowing 70% of CO2 saturation for 2–3 minutes, followed by decapitation. The encephala were collected and weighted. Cortex and hippocampus were dissected [23], RNA later (AM7021, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was added, and the tissues immediately stored at -80C for neurochemical assays: lipid peroxidation by evaluation of tissue levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive species and parasite load determination by quantitative PCR.

2.3 Benznidazole treatment

Groups of 7–10 infected animals were treated daily, from 120 to 150 dpi, by gavage with 0.1 mL of vehicle (Veh) apyrogenic vaccine-graded water (BioManguinhos, Fiocruz, Brazil) or 0.1 mL of Veh containing 25 mg/Kg of the trypanocidal medicament Bz (LAFEPE, Brazil), previously shown to be effective in controlling parasitemia and parasitism [24]. As controls, 3–10 sex- and age-matched non-infected (NI) mice were kept concurrently and submitted to Veh administration.

2.4 Conditions of behavioral evaluation

All behavioral tests were conducted between 8:00 am-3:00 pm and recorded using a DSC-DVD810 video camera (Sony, USA). To minimize stress and increase familiarity, all behavioral tests applied to different experimental groups were performed in an environment provided with 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark cycle at a room temperature of 22 ± 2°C and noise level of approximately 40 dB produced by an air conditioner. Different groups of animals were submitted to behavioral tests from 118–120 dpi (referred as 120 dpi) or 149–151 dpi (referred as 150 dpi). No animals were re-tested. When possible, the animals were reused in different tests, aiming to reduce the number of animals used. Behavioral tests were performed from less stressful tests to the more stressful (habituation memory test, novel object recognition memory test, passive aversive shock evoked test, grip strength meter test).

2.5 Habituation memory test

To evaluate the habituation memory, we used the open field apparatus, a white acrylic arena measuring 60 cm x 60 cm. The floor of the apparatus was divided by black grid lines into 49 squares of approximately 8.5 cm each and two imaginary areas—the periphery (40 squares along the walls) and center (9 squares in the central area of the apparatus). In the training session, the animals were carefully placed in the rear left square of the device and left to explore the environment freely for 5 min. Immediately after this time, the animals were returned to the housing cages. The long-term memory test was performed 24-hours after the training, in which the procedure was repeated, and the 5 min session was recorded using a digital video camera (Sony, USA). The apparatus was cleaned with 70% alcohol and dried with gauze between tests. The memory retention was evaluated by counting the number of total lines crossed on the test session [25] and the individual baseline differences were corrected using the change ratio score to compare behavior during initial and final sessions, as follows: number of crossed lines day 2 /(number of crossed lines day 1 + number of crossed lines day 2), as previously described [26].

2.6 Novel object recognition memory task

The one-trial learning or one-trial object recognition task consisted of a sample trial of 5 min duration, in which mice explore two equal objects in a 60 cm x 60 cm open field arena (the same used for the habituation memory test). After a 24-hours intersession interval, a novel object is presented together with one familiar object already explored during the sample trial, for a 5 min duration test session. The apparatus and objects were cleaned with a solution of 70% alcohol and dried to eliminate the odor and trace of the previously tested mouse. This test is based on the innate preference of non-infected normal rodents to explore the novel object rather than the familiar one [27]. This kind of test is derived from the “visual paired-comparison paradigm” used in human and non-human primates and may allow interspecies comparison [28]. The discrimination index (DI) was calculated as follows: time exploring the novel object/(time exploring the novel object + time exploring the familiar object), as previously shown [29].

2.7 Aversive shock evoked test

The procedure was modified from the previously described test [30]. Briefly, the inhibitory avoidance apparatus (EP 104MR, Insight, Brazil) consisted of a 35 x 28 x 50 cm epoxy-painted 2 mm aluminum box with acrylic front door, whose floor consisted of parallel stainless-steel bars (3 mm diam.) spaced 1 cm apart. A 7 cm wide x 2.5 cm high platform was placed on the floor of the box against the wall of the righthand side. In a pre-exposure session, animals were placed on the platform and allowed to explore the box freely for 5 min without foot shock. A training session was carried out 2 hours after pre-exposure, followed by a test session 24-hours after training. For training, animals were placed on the platform and their latency to step down on the grid with all four paws was measured with an automatic device. In training sessions, immediately after stepping down on the grid, the animals received a 3.0-sec scrambled foot shock (0.6 mA), and one to five stimulations were required for memory acquisition. In test sessions, no foot shock was administered, and the step-down latency (maximum 120 sec) was used as a measure of memory retention. An increase in step-down latency during test was taken as an index of improved memory and vice versa.

2.8 Grip strength meter test

Muscle strength was assessed using the grip strength meter (EFF 305, Insight, Brazil), according to manufacturer’s instructions. This noninvasive method, which may disclose a neuromuscular disorder, is based on the natural tendency of mice to grab a horizontal metal bar when slightly pulled by the tail for 2–3 seconds. The bar is attached to a force transducer which measures the traction peak (in gram-force) that is displayed on a digital screen. Data are presented as mean of strength intensity = gram-force (gf)/body weight (g).

2.9 Histopathology

At 150 dpi, non-infected and T. cruzi-infected mice were euthanized, as described in item 2.2. The encephalon was removed, fixed in buffered formalin 10%, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Five μm-thick sections were prepared, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and two sections per encephalon tissue were blindly examined using light microscopy. Representative images were digitized using a Sight DS-U3 color-view digital camera adapted to an Eclipse Ci-S microscope and analyzed with the digital morphometric apparatus NIS Elements BR version 4.3 software (Nikon Co., Japan).

2.10 Determination of parasite load in the CNS by quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Mice were euthanized and encephalon removed and dissected, as described in item 2.2. DNA was extracted from dissected cerebral cortex and hippocampus samples using 1 mL of TRI-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for each tissue (20 mg), 200 μL of chloroform (Merck, USA) were added and incubated for 2 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 x g at 4°C for 15 min, the organic phase and interface were obtained, and the DNA was precipitated by adding 300 μL of 100% ethanol (Merck, USA) and incubated for 3 min. The material was centrifuged at 2000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, and the DNA pellet was washed twice in 1 mL of a solution containing 0.1 M sodium citrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 10% ethanol: incubation for 30 min at room temperature with periodic stirring and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The DNA pellet was suspended in 1.5 mL of 75% ethanol and incubated for 15 min at room temperature with periodic shaking. After centrifugation at 2000 x g for 5 min at 4°C, the supernatant was removed, and the DNA was dried for 10 min. Next, the DNA was dissolved in 100 μL of 8 mM NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Centrifuged at 13000 x g for 10 min and the supernatant aliquoted. The qPCR assays were performed by absolute quantification to estimate the parasite load, based on a standard curve produced from DNA samples extracted from fragments of mouse cortex or hippocampus artificially contaminated with T. cruzi. For this, 20 mg of cortex or hippocampus samples (uninfected mouse) were spiked with 105 T. cruzi trypomastigotes, and DNA was extracted as described. Serial dilutions of 1:10 were carried out using Tris-EDTA buffer to produce the standard curve, ranging from 105 to 1 parasite equivalents, and from 20 to 2 × 10−4 mg mouse cortex or hippocampus equivalents. The qPCR assays were carried out with 5 μL of DNA, using the FastStart Universal Probe Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in a final volume of 20 μL. The amplifications were carried out in a ABI 7500 Fast Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) using 750 nM of Cruzi 1 (Sequence: 5 'AST CGG CTG ATC GTT TTC GA 3’) and Cruzi 2 (Sequence: 5 'AAT TCC TCC AAG CAG CGG ATA 3') primers, 50 nM of Cruzi 3 probe (Sequence: 5’-FAM CAC ACA CTG GAC ACC AA- NFQ-MGB-3’). Concurrently, a TaqMan assay targeting mouse GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase VIC/TAMRA-labelled, Mm99999915g1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to quantify the brain tissue mg equivalents, according to manufacturer´s instructions. Thus, the parasite load was normalized by the tissue mg equivalents, by dividing the T. cruzi quantity by the mass of mice tissue equivalents (cortex or hippocampus). PCR cycling conditions were: 95˚C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95˚C 15s and 58˚C for 1min. To analyze the results, the threshold was set at 0.02.

2.11 Lipid peroxidation evaluation in the CNS

Mice were euthanized and encephalon removed and dissected, as described in item 2.2. The tissue levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) in the cortex and hippocampus were determined by Ohkawa's method [31]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is one of several low-molecular-weight end products of degradation of hydroperoxides and lipid peroxides formed during the oxidation of fatty acids [19, 32]. MDA reacts with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) to form a pink-colored dimeric compound. Dissected cortex and hippocampus were homogenated. Ten percent (w/v) of tissue homogenate was mixed with 8.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 20% acetic acid pH 3.5 and 0.8% TBA, and incubated at 95°C for 1 hour. After incubation, the reaction product was extracted with n-butanol (1:1) and read using a spectrophotometer (Spectra Max M5, Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 532 nm.

2.12 Statistical analysis

The sample size was determined based on the experience of our group and previous studies using the model of experimental chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy; therefore, no formal sample size was calculated. The data of 3 independent experiments were grouped. Data are expressed as arithmetic means ± standard error (SE). Statistical comparisons between groups were carried out by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. All statistical tests were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1 Muscular strength is preserved in C57BL/6 mice chronically infected with the Colombian Trypanosoma cruzi strain

Out of 92 C57BL/6 female mice, 25 were non-infected (NI) controls and 67 were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly monitored for parasitemia, body weight and clinical follow-up (Fig 1). In the first set of experiments, mice were analyzed at 120 dpi (Fig 2A) when 100% of them were alive (Fig 2B), and no mouse was excluded by death outside of planned euthanasia or humane endpoint criteria. At 120 dpi, NI controls and infected mice presented similar physical characteristics and body weight (S1A Fig; 22.7 ± 0.70 in NI mice vs 20.6 ± 2.9 in T. cruzi-infected mice; p > 0.05). After 15 dpi, all infected mice showed circulating parasites, blood parasitism peaked at 42–45 dpi, and at 120 dpi parasitemia was controlled (Fig 2C). In comparison with sex- and age-matched NI controls, T. cruzi-infected mice showed no muscular strength alteration (p > 0.05; Fig 2D). Therefore, chronically Colombian-infected C57BL/6 mice were able to perform behavioral tests based on mobility and body activity.

Fig 2. C57BL/6 mice infected with the Colombian Trypanosoma cruzi strain control parasitemia, survive, and develop chronic phase with preserved muscle strength.

Fig 2

(A) Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms, parasitemia and death were recorded weekly, and the animals were analyzed in the chronic phase of infection (120 dpi). (B) Survival curve (percentage of alive mice). (C) Parasitemia curve (Parasites x 104/mL). (D) The graph shows the results of muscle strength [gram force (gf)/body weight (g)] of T. cruzi-infected mice compared with sex- and age-matched noninfected controls (NI), at 120 dpi. Each experimental group consisted of 5 NI mice and 7–10 T. cruzi-infected mice. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are represented as means ± SE of three independent experiments (15 NI; 27 T. cruzi-infected mice). Data were analyzed using t-Student test.

3.2 Memory dysfunctions and brain atrophy are detected in chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice

Habituation memory was assessed using the open field test and comparing the performance in the first and second day of testing. At 120 dpi, T. cruzi-infected mice and NI controls showed similar discrimination index (p > 0.05; Fig 3A), supporting that habituation memory was preserved. However, the performance of T. cruzi-infected mice in the novel object recognition test revealed reduced discrimination index, supporting loss of object recognition memory (Fig 3B). At 120 dpi, similar numbers of stimulation were required for aversive memory acquisition in the training day (2.5 ± 0.34 in NI mice vs 1.9 ± 0.48 in T. cruzi-infected mice; p > 0.05). Interestingly, the aversive memory was preserved in most of the T. cruzi-infected mice (81%), though in 19% of them latency was reduced in the aversive shock evoked test (Fig 3C). At 120 dpi, no difference was detected in body weight of T. cruzi-infected mice, compared with NI controls (S1A Fig). However, reduced brain weight was observed in chronically T. cruzi-infected mice, in comparison with age-matched NI controls (Fig 3D), suggesting the presence of encephalon atrophy in chronic experimental chagasic infection.

Fig 3. Memory loss in chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

Fig 3

Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms of the Colombian T. cruzi strain and analyzed at 120 dpi, comparing with noninfected controls (NI). (A) The graph shows the discrimination index [number of crossed line day 2 /(number of crossed line day 1 + number of crossed line day 2)] assessed by the open field test used to evaluate habituation memory. (B) The graph shows the discrimination index [time exploring the novel object/(time exploring the novel object + time exploring the familiar object)] evaluated by the novel object recognition test object applied to assess recognition memory. (C) The graph shows the latency (second; sec) measured using the aversive shock evoked test to evaluate aversive memory. (D) The graph shows the encephalon weight (mg). Each experimental group consisted of 5 NI mice and 7–10 T. cruzi-infected mice. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are represented as means ± SE of three independent experiments (15 NI; 27 T. cruzi-infected mice). Data were analyzed using t-Student test (A, B and D) and ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest (C). *, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001, comparing T. cruzi-infected and NI mice.

3.3 Benznidazole therapy beneficially impacts on memory loss in chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice

Chronically infected mice were treated with 25 mg/Kg/day of Bz from 120 to 150 dpi (Fig 4A) to evaluate the impact of Bz therapy on memory loss onset and progression. Survival was of 100% in the groups of Veh- and Bz-treated mice, and no mouse showed sickness scores for humane endpoint. At 150 dpi, Bz therapy did not impact body weight (S1A Fig), when compared to NI controls and Veh-treated infected and likened to T. cruzi-infected mice pre-therapy (at 120 dpi). At 120 and 150 dpi, T. cruzi-infected mice presented increased relative spleen weight, and Bz administration reduced this splenomegaly (S1B Fig), confirming the effectiveness of this therapy [24]. At 150 dpi, in comparison with sex- and age-matched NI controls, memory loss was detected in Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected mice submitted to the open field test (Fig 4B), novel object recognition task (Fig 4C) and shock evoked test (Fig 4D). Bz therapy initiated at 120 dpi prevented the habituation memory impairment (Fig 4B). Importantly, Bz treatment reversed the memory loss assessed by novel object recognition memory task (Fig 4C). The aversive memory loss already detected in a low number of mice (19%) at 120 dpi, progresses to a larger number of mice (34%) at 150 dpi, indicating progressive decline of aversive memory. Notably, Bz therapy initiated at 120 dpi hampered aversive memory loss at 150 dpi (Fig 4D). Therefore, Bz administration to chronically infected mice beneficially affected memory loss.

Fig 4. Memory loss is improved by benznidazole administration to chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

Fig 4

(A) Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms of the Colombian T. cruzi strain and benznidazole (Bz, 0.1 mL gavage; 25 mg/Kg/day) or pyrogen-free water (Veh, 0.1 mL gavage) were administered for 30 consecutive days, from 120 to 150 dpi, when mice were tested. (B) The graph shows the discrimination index [number of crossed line day 2 /(number of crossed line day 1 + number of crossed line day 2)] assessed by the open field test used to evaluate habituation memory. (C) The graph shows the discrimination index [time exploring the novel object/(time exploring the novel object + time exploring the familiar object)] evaluated by the novel object recognition test. (D) The graph shows the latency (second; sec) measured using the aversive shock evoked test to evaluate aversive memory. Each experimental group consisted of 10 NI mice and 10 T. cruzi-infected mice. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are shown as means ± SE and represent two independent experiments. Data were analyzed using ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest. **, p<0.01 and ***, p<0.001, comparing T. cruzi-infected and NI mice; #, p<0.05 and ##, p<0.01, comparing Bz-treated and Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected.

3.4 CNS tissue architecture is preserved in chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice

At 150 dpi, the CNS structures were preserved in age-matched NI control mice. At 150 dpi, the CNS structures were also well-preserved and no signs of tissue damage as hemorrhage and parenchymal blood vessels inflammatory cuffs were detected, though rare inflammatory infiltrates were restricted to meninges in Veh-treated mice (Fig 5A). Importantly, the CNS tissue was devoid of neuroinflammation, as shown in tissue sections of brain areas as cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum (Fig 5A). Further, Bz therapy did not modify the CNS tissue architecture in chronically T. cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice and, moreover, abrogated the sporadic inflammatory infiltrates in meninges (Fig 5A). At 150 dpi, Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected mice showed blood vessels with a few mononuclear leukocytes and rare inflammatory cells infiltrating the choroid plexus, when compared with age-matched NI controls. Again, inflammatory cells were not detected in the choroid plexus of Bz-treated infected mice (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. CNS tissue architecture is preserved in chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

Fig 5

Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms of the Colombian T. cruzi strain and benznidazole (Bz, 0.1 mL gavage; 25 mg/Kg/day) or pyrogen-free water (Veh, 0.1 mL gavage) were administered for 30 consecutive days, from 120 to 150 dpi, when mice were euthanized, tissue collected and fixed. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. (A) Representative sections of cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum areas of noninfected, and Veh-treated and Bz-treated T. cruzi-infected mice. Bar = 100 μm. (B) Representative sections of choroid plexus areas of noninfected, and Veh-treated and Bz-treated T. cruzi-infected mice. Bar = 100 μm. Arrows show infiltration of rare mononuclear inflammatory cells in perivascular areas.

3.5 Therapeutic intervention with benznidazole reduces parasite load in the CNS of chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice

Next, we challenged the influence of parasite load in the CNS in behavioral alterations in chronically infected mice. As expected, 30 days of Bz administration (from 120 to 150 dpi) to chronically Colombian-infected C57BL/6 mice efficiently reduced parasitemia (Fig 6A). Parasite DNA was detected and quantified in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of chronically T. cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice (Fig 6B and 6C). Notably, in comparison with Veh administration, Bz therapy reduced parasite load in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of infected mice (Fig 6B and 6C).

Fig 6. Benznidazole therapy reduces parasitemia and parasite load in the central nervous system of chronically T. cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

Fig 6

Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms of the Colombian T. cruzi strain and benznidazole (Bz, 0.1 mL gavage; 25 mg/Kg/day) or pyrogen-free water (Veh, 0.1 mL gavage) were administered for 30 consecutive days, from 120 to 150 dpi, when parasitemia was analyzed, mice were euthanized, tissue collected, DNA extracted and qPCR performed. (A) Parasitemia levels. Group data for qPCR detection of T. cruzi satDNA in (B) hippocampus and (C) cerebral cortex. Each experimental group consisted of 3 NI mice and 3 randomly sorted T. cruzi-infected mice per experimental group. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are shown as means ± SE and represent two independent experiments. Data were analyzed using ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest. ##, p<0.01 and ###, p<0.001, comparing Bz-treated and Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected.

3.6 Therapeutic intervention with Bz decreases oxidative stress in the cerebral cortex of chronically infected mice

To provide additional mechanistic insights on the beneficial effects of Bz therapy on memory loss, we analyzed the presence of TBARS, as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress, in the CNS of chronically T. cruzi-infected mice. At 120 dpi (pre-therapy point) and 150 dpi (end point of therapy) CNS were collected, dissected, and analyzed. At both time points, increased TBARS levels were detected in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of infected mice, when compared with NI controls (Fig 7A–7B). A representative experiment shows that Bz therapy reduced TBARS levels in the extracts of hippocampus in 2 out of 3 tested infected mice (Fig 7A). Importantly, Bz therapy significantly reduced TBARS levels in the extracts of cerebral cortex of T. cruzi-infected mice (Fig 7B), supporting that Bz therapy reduced the abnormal lipid peroxidation in the CNS of chronically infected mice.

Fig 7. Therapeutic intervention with Bz decreases oxidative stress in cerebral cortex of chronically infected mice.

Fig 7

Mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigote forms of the Colombian T. cruzi strain and benznidazole (Bz, 0.1 mL gavage; 25 mg/Kg/day) or pyrogen-free water (Veh, 0.1 mL gavage) were administered for 30 consecutive days, from 120 to 150 dpi, when mice were euthanized, tissue collected, extracts prepared and TBARS revealed the oxidative stress marker MDA in (B) hippocampus and (C) cerebral cortex. Each experimental group consisted of 3 NI mice and 3 randomly sorted T. cruzi-infected mice per experimental group. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are shown as means ± SE and represent two independent experiments. Data were analyzed using ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest. *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01 and ***, p<0.001, comparing T. cruzi-infected and NI mice; ##, p<0.01, comparing Bz-treated and Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected. &&, p<0.01, comparing Bz-treated and T. cruzi-infected pre-therapy (p-Th; 120 dpi).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we showed that chronically T. cruzi-infected mice present deficits of spatial habituation, novel object recognition and aversive memory recall, in the absence of neuroinflammation but with T. cruzi parasite persistence and increased lipid peroxidation in the CNS hippocampus and cortex. Importantly, Bz therapy interfered beneficially with cognitive impairment in a way related to reduction of parasite load systemically and in the CNS. Further, Bz-therapy decreased the levels of lipid peroxidation in the cerebral cortex.

As consequence of successful interventions targeting vector transmission, most of the CD patients in Latin America are over 45-years old [2] and may be vulnerable to aging-borne behavioral abnormalities [20, 33]. The influence of T. cruzi infection on behavioral alterations, particularly on memory loss, is questioned. Importantly, cognitive and memory impairments have been described in chronic CD patients, mainly detected as disturbs of comprehension and perception, orientation and attention loss, as well as impaired capacity to answer to visual-paired comparison tests [1115]. However, it is a controversial matter as immediate and delayed memory impairment were not detected in patients with Chagas’ heart disease, the main clinical form of CD [7]. Herein, we questioned whether T. cruzi infection may impact memory/learning process in an experimental model of chronic CD. To approach our questions, C57BL/6 mice were infected with low inoculum of blood trypomastigotes of the Colombian type I T. cruzi strain, which allowed immune response to control parasite, host survival and development of the chronic phase of infection [18, 22]. Further, in comparison with age-matched non-infected controls, chronically infected mice did not display neuromuscular disorders assessed by grip strength meter test, and, therefore, suitable as an experimental model to address our issues. Non-infected C57BL/6 mice preserved the abilities to establish and evoke habituation, novel object recognition and aversive shock-evoked memory. However, in age-matched Colombian-infected mice, object recognition memory was impaired, while habituation memory was preserved, at 120 dpi. At this moment, only a low frequency (19%) of mice showed aversive memory impairment, while at 150 dpi object recognition and habituation memories were disrupted, and the frequency of mice with aversive memory impairment was increased (34%). Dissociated memory loss has been reported as a traumatic brain injury outcome, with novel object recognition memory deficit without affecting habituation and aversive memory [34]. Moreover, long-term memory evocation tests showed that in chronically T. cruzi-infected mice disturbs in object recognition, habituation and aversive memory tends to be progressively established, mimicking aspects of memory loss in CD patients [1115]. This progressive decline of memory is a common feature of mnemonic deficits in aging and neurodegenerative disorders [20, 33]. It is important to note that these cognitive abnormalities were simultaneous with cerebral atrophy, as described in patients with chronic CD [9]. Therefore, T. cruzi infection may trigger and/or accelerate an aging-associated process of memory decline, here well reproduced in C57BL/6 mice chronically infected with type I parasite strain.

The association of cognitive impairment and CD is biologically plausible, as severe Chagas’ heart disease frequently shows thromboembolism and congestive heart failure [2]. Conditions leading to oxygen deprivation and injury of the CNS have been associated with behavioral alterations and memory loss [35, 36]. The relation between cerebrovascular resistance evaluated by transcranial Doppler and worse cognitive scores suggests that microembolism may be responsible for a significant proportion of cognitive symptoms in chagasic and non-chagasic patients with congestive heart failure [37]. Acute T. cruzi infection induces cerebral microvasculopathy, with increased leukocyte-endothelium interaction (rolling and adhesion) and microvascular platelet-leukocyte aggregates [38, 39]. However, in chronically Colombian-infected mice, the CNS blood vessels are not activated, being refractory to cell adhesion [39]. Nevertheless, the contribution of heart disease to memory impairment cannot be ruled out as the Colombian-infected C57BL/6 mice present chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy with electrical abnormalities and reduced ventricular function [22, 40], thus limiting the interpretation of our findings. However, in a group of chronic CD patients cognitive impairment was associated with T. cruzi infection, but not mediated by CD-related electrocardiographic abnormalities [10], supporting that these could be dissociated processes.

Administration of the trypanocide drug Bz to chronically infected CD patients reduces parasite load in blood and does not aggravate the disease. However, Bz therapy presents controversial results, with beneficial or no measurable effects, in Chagas’ heart disease outcome [4145]. Bz therapy initiated after parasitemia control, in the early chronic phase of T. cruzi infection, reduced the severity of chronic heart disease at 8 months of infection [46]. When Bz was administered to chronically infected mice to reverse heart disease, the beneficial effects were restricted to improve average heart rate and reduce the frequency of mice with arrhythmias and second-degree atrioventricular blockage [24]. Importantly, administration of the full recommended dose of Bz (100 mg/Kg/day) in the acute phase of experimental Colombian infection prevented depressive-like behavior in the chronic phase of infection [17]. Here, we showed that memory deficits described in chronically infected mice were beneficially impacted by Bz therapy. The administration of reduced Bz dosage, one fourth of the recommended dose [24], initiated at 120 dpi for short period (30 consecutive days) prevented the habituation memory impairment. Moreover, Bz therapy reversed object recognition memory loss and hampered progression of the aversive memory impairment. Therefore, it is the first demonstration that Bz administration ameliorated and, even more, reversed cognitive abnormalities.

In CD patients, the cognitive impairment lacks histopathological evidence and occurs in the absence of neuroinflammation [8, 9]. Nonexistence of neuroinflammation is also a hallmark of experimental chronic T. cruzi infection [39, 47]. Here, we bring evidence that in Colombian-infected C57BL/6 mice, memory impairment occurs in the absence of inflammation in the CNS cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, crucial areas for memory functions [33, 48]. In the adopted experimental model of chronic infection of C57BL/6 mice, rare inflammatory cells were restricted to meninges and choroid plexus, corroborating studies using the Colombian T. cruzi strain for the acute infection of Swiss mice and the chronic infection of C3H/He mice [39, 47, 49, 50]. Although in low numbers and restricted to meninges and choroid plexus, one cannot rule out the participation of these infiltrating mononuclear cells and their products, as cytokines and chemokines, in the cognitive impairment detected in chronically T. cruzi-infected mice.

The T. cruzi parasite DNA was detected in the CNS hippocampus and cortex areas of chronically Colombian-infected mice. Previously, low-grade parasitism was revealed as T. cruzi-antigen positive cells randomically scattered throughout the CNS parenchyma of acute and chronically infected mice [39, 47, 50]. Further, in HIV-infected immunosuppressed chronic CD patients the CNS is the main site of parasitism reactivation [51]. Thus, these data support parasite persistence in the CNS tissue in chronic T. cruzi infection in humans and experimental models, being able to contribute to behavioral alterations, as memory dysfunction. In another neuroinfection, caused by the intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii, behavioral changes as psychomotor alterations and decreased memory performance have been described and related with parasite persistence in the CNS [52]. Therefore, we asked the contribution of parasite persistence in the CNS to memory impairment in the chronic phase of experimental infection, using Bz as trypanocide drug. Previously, we have shown that Bz therapy in the acute T. cruzi infection prevented depressive-like behavior in early chronic infection [17], supporting the idea that T. cruzi infection may trigger behavioral alterations. Here, our data support that administration of a low dose of Bz for a short period to chronically T. cruzi-infected mice showed beneficial effects on memory loss, as prevented habituation memory impairment, reversed the object recognition memory loss, and hampered progression of aversive memory disruption. These beneficial effects were associated with decreased parasitemia, supporting the systemically action of Bz, and reduced parasite load in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex areas, showing the effectiveness of Bz in the CNS parasite control. In the BENEFIT study, in which chronic cardiac CD patients were treated with Bz or placebo, it was shown that the reduction in blood parasite load did not significantly affect the clinical deterioration of the patients [43]. Bz administration to chronically Colombian-infected C57BL/6 mice reduced parasitemia and heart parasite load but showed limited beneficial effects on cardiac disease [24]. Interestingly, in a model of septic shock Bz showed down-regulatory effect on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production selectively linked to the nuclear factor NF-kB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [53]. Further, Bz administration to chronically T. cruzi-infected mice also reduced TNF expression in the heart tissue [24]. Astrocyte-born TNF may contribute to T. cruzi persistence mainly in astrocytes, as parasite-positive spots in the CNS [47, 54]. However, in the CNS TNF expression may be restricted to these parasite-positive areas, where TNF may be rapidly consumed. Since TNF upregulation was undetectable in the CNS of the Colombian-infected mice [17], the effects of Bz on TNF expression in the brain tissue could not be explored. Therefore, besides the direct effect on intracellular parasite forms, the beneficial effects of Bz in reducing the CNS parasite load may reside in disrupting the autocrine cytokine production and, therefore, TNF signaling. Notably, the administration of anti-TNF and pentoxiphyline, a modulator of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) expression, to chronically T. cruzi-infected mice supports that signaling via TNF/TNFR1 may take part in depressive-like behavior [17]. Thus, a point to be further explored is the contribution of TNF/TNFR signaling in T. cruzi infection-associated memory loss. Crucially, there is an emerging comprehension of how dysregulation of cytokine networks is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and memory impairment in humans and animal models [55].

Multiple or sequential processes may contribute to memory deficits in chronically T. cruzi-infected mice. In Alzheimer disease, behavioral changes have been associated with oxidative stress, characterized as augmented lipid peroxidation in the cerebral cortex [19, 32]. Oxidative damage induces a cascade of downstream reactive oxygen species, some transient and other downstream substances that accumulate in the CNS as malondialdehyde, a TBARS that may be detected in tissue extracts [56]. In mice acutely infected with type II T. cruzi strain, reduced response of the CNS endothelial cells to acetylcholine associated to enhanced detection of TBARS, was restricted to the parasitemia peak [38]. Further, in acutely T. cruzi-infected Swiss mice, aversive memory impairment has been shown in association with oxidative stress, revealed as increased cerebral acetylcholinesterase activity [57]. Here, we showed in chronically infected mice a relation of memory loss and enhanced oxidative stress, revealed as increased TBARS in the CNS hippocampus and cortex areas pre-therapy (120 dpi) and in vehicle-treated (150 dpi) mice. In the CNS, this increase in oxidative stress may result of the action of the parasite directly leading to cell death or indirectly inducing production of inflammatory mediators into this tissue. However, one could not exclude the leakage of reactive substances into the CNS parenchyma, since in chronically T. cruzi-infected rats increased TBARS in plasma may unveil a systemic oxidative stress [58]. Administration of Bz (40 mg/Kg/day) elicited oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant machinery in rat hepatocytes, which may contribute to Bz toxicity [59]. However, it does not seem to be the case in our study, since the levels of TBARS were not increased in the hippocampus and showed a significant reduction in the cerebral cortex after 30 consecutive days of Bz therapy, when memory deficits were beneficially impacted. These conflicting data may be explained as Bz is metabolized in liver, the brain is less permeable to orally administered Bz, we used a model of chronic T. cruzi infection in mouse and administered a low dose of Bz, which may reduce the toxic effects of this trypanocidal drug, in accordance with our initial goal [24, 60].

In conclusion, our results support that the nervous form of chronic CD occurs in the absence of neuroinflammation but associated with parasite persistence and increased oxidative stress in the CNS, showing as clinical outcome behavioral changes as long-term memory impairment. Although with some limitations, mostly related to the molecular levels of Bz action in the CNS, our present findings open a new pathway to be explored using Bz in the chronic phase of CD not only aiming to treat the cardiac form, but also to ameliorate cognitive disorders and improve the quality of life of CD patients.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. The arrive essential 10: Author checklist.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Beneficial effect of benznidazole administration on splenomegaly of chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

C57BL/6 mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigotes of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi, and treated with Veh or Bz, as described in legend of Fig 3. (A) Body weight (g). (B) Relative spleen weight (mg/g). Data represent two independent experiments with 3 NI controls and 5 infected mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are shown as means ± SE and were analyzed using ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest. *, p<0.05 and ***, p<0.001, comparing T. cruzi-infected and NI mice; ##, p<0.01, comparing Bz-treated and Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected.

(TIF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro/FAPERJ (E-26/110.153/2013, E-26/202.572/2019, E-26/210.190/2018) and the Brazilian Research Council/CNPq (BPP-304474/2015-0, PDJ- 159084/2014-8, BPP 306037/2019-0, INCTV, National Institute for Science and Technology for Vaccines), Grant PAEF2-IOC/Fiocruz. J. Lannes-Vieira, C. Britto and O. Cruz Moreira are research fellows of the Brazilian Research Council/CNPq and recognized with the grant Scientist (JLV, CB) and Young Scientist (OCM) of the State of Rio de Janeiro/FAPERJ. This study was financed in part by the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior do Brasil” (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization; Chagas Disease (American trypanosomiasis). World Health Organization (WHO); [Internet]. 2019. [Cited 2019 December 10] Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dias JC, Ramos AN Jr, Gontijo ED, Luquetti A, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Coura JR, et al. II Brazilian Consensus on Chagas Disease, 2015. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016; 49Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3–60. 10.1590/0037-8682-0505-2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chagas C. Nova entidade mórbida do homem. Rezumo geral de estudos etiologicos e clinicos. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1911; 3:219–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pittella JE. Central nervous system involvement in Chagas disease: a hundred-year old history. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 103(10):973–978. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Py MO. Neurologic manifestations of Chagas disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011; 11(6):536–542. 10.1007/s11910-011-0225-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silva AA, Vilar-Pereira G, Souza SA, Silva RR, Rocha SM, Lannes-Vieira J. Trypanosoma cruzi-induced central nervous system alterations: From the entry of inflammatory cells to potential cognitive and psychiatric abnormalities. J Neuroparasit. 2010; 1(2010): N100901, 13 pages. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dias JS, Lacerda AM, Vieira-de-Melo RM, Viana LC, Jesus PA, Reis FJ, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy. Dement Neuropsychol. 2009; 3(1):27–33. 10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30100006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alencar A. Encefalopatia crônica chagásica. J Bras Neurol. 1982; 18:7–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oliveira-Filho J, Vieira-de-Melo RM, Reis PS, Lacerda AM, Neville IS, Cincura C, et al. Chagas disease is independently associated with brain atrophy. J Neurol. 2009; 256(8):1363–1365. 10.1007/s00415-009-5105-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lima-Costa MF, Castro-Costa E, Uchôa E, Firmo J, Ribeiro ALP, Ferri CP, et al. A population-based study of the association between Trypanosoma cruzi infection and cognitive impairment in old age (the Bambuí Study). Neuroepidemiology. 2009; 32(2):122–128. 10.1159/000182819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mangone CA, Sica RE, Pereyra S, Genovese O, Segura E, Riarte A, et al. Cognitive impairment in human chronic Chagas' disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994; 52(2):200–203. 10.1590/s0004-282x1994000200008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prost JO, Romero Villanueva H, Morikone AM, Polo G, Bosch AM. Evidencias de compromiso cerebral en el estadio crónico de la enfermedad de chagas obtenidas por medio del potencial p 300 y de electroencefalografía cuantificada. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2000; 58(2A):262–271. 10.1590/s0004-282x2000000200010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jörg ME, Freire RS, Orlando AS, Bustamante AG, Figueredo RC, Peltier YA, et al. Disfunción cerebral mínima como secuela de minigoencefalitis aguda por Trypanosoma cruzi. Prensa Médica Argentina. 1972; 59:1658–1669. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moncada GB, Romero J, Espinoza E, Leal FM. Desarrollo mental en ñinos com infección chagásica crónica. Arch Venez Pueric Pediatr. 1987; 50:106–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pereyra S. Rastreo cognitivo en pacientes con enfermedade de Chagas en estado crónico: estudio preliminar. Rev Neurol Argent. 1992; 17(2):37–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arankowsky-Sandoval G, Mut-Martín M, Solís-Rodríguez F, Góngora-Alfaro JL, Barrera-Pérez M. Sleep and memory deficits in the rat produced by experimental infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 306(1–2):65–68. 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01866-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vilar-Pereira G, Silva AA, Pereira IR, Silva RR, Moreira OC, de Almeida LR, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi-induced depressive-like behavior is independent of meningoencephalitis but responsive to parasiticide and TNF-targeted therapeutic interventions. Brain Behav Immun. 2012; 26(7):1136–1149. 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vilar-Pereira G, Ruivo LAS, Lannes-Vieira J. Behavioural alterations are independent of sickness behaviour in chronic experimental Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015; 110(8):1042–1050. 10.1590/0074-02760150300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McIntosh LJ, Trush MA, Troncoso JC. Increased susceptibility of Alzheimer’s disease temporal cortex to oxygen free radical-mediated processes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997; 23(2):183–190. 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00573-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lananna BV, Musiek ES. The wrinkling of time: Aging, inflammation, oxidative stress, and the circadian clock in neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2020; 139:104832 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, et al. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Second Satellite Meeting. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009; 104(7):1051–1054. 10.1590/s0074-02762009000700021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Silverio JC, Pereira IR, Cipitelli M da C, Vinagre NF, Rodrigues MM, Gazzinelli RT, et al. CD8+ T-cells expressing interferon gamma or perforin play antagonistic roles in heart injury in experimental Trypanosoma cruzi-elicited cardiomyopathy. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8(4):e1002645 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Spijker S. Dissection of Rodent Brain Regions Ka Wan Li (ed.), Neuroproteomics, Neuromethods. 2011: 57: Chapter 2:13–26. Springer Science-Business Media, LLC. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vilar-Pereira G, Pereira IR, Ruivo LAS, Moreira OC, Silva AA, Britto C, et al. Combination chemotherapy with suboptimal doses of benznidazole and pentoxifylline sustains partial reversion of experimental Chagas' heart disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016; 60(7):4297–4309. 10.1128/AAC.02123-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barros D, Amaral OB, Izquierdo I, Geracitano L, Raseira MCB, Henriques AT, et al. Behavioral and genoprotective effects of Vaccinium berries intake in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006; 84(2):229–234. 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bolivar VJ. Intrasession and intersession habituation in mice: from inbred strain variability to linkage analysis. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009; 92(2):206–214. 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dere E, Huston JP, De Souza MAS. The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007; 31(5):673–704. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leger M, Quiedeville A, Bouet V, Haelewyn B, Boulouard M, Schumann-Bard P, et al. Object recognition test in mice. Nat Protocol. 2013; 8(12):2531–2537. 10.1038/nprot.2013.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abad S, Camarasa J, Pubill D, Camins A, Escubedo E. Adaptive Plasticity in the hippocampus of young mice intermittently exposed to MDMA could be the origin of memory deficits. Mol Neurobiol. 2016; 53(10):7271–7283. 10.1007/s12035-015-9618-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Quevedo J, Feier G, Agostinho FR, Martins MR, Roesler R. Consolidação da memória e estresse pós-traumático [Memory consolidation and posttraumatic stress disorder]. Braz J Psychiatry. 2003; 25(Suppl 1):25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979; 95(2):351–358. 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Afonso CB, Spickett CM. Lipoproteins as targets and markers of lipoxidation. Redox Biol. 2019; 23:101066 10.1016/j.redox.2018.101066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matthews BR. Memory Dysfunction. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015; 21(3 Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry):613–626. 10.1212/01.CON.0000466656.59413.29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moonjen VKM, Damiani-Neves M, Bavaresco DV, Pescador BB, Comim CM, Quevedo J, et al. NMDA preconditioning prevents object recognition memory impairment in traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2012; 1466:82–89. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoirisch-Clapauch S, Nardi AE, Gris JC, Brenner B. Mental Disorders and Thrombotic Risk. Semin. Thromb Hemost. 2013; 39(8):943–949. 10.1055/s-0033-1357486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Medicherla CB and Lewis A. The critically ill brain after cardiac arrest. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020; 2020: 10.1111/nyas.14423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jesus PAP, Vieira-de-Melo RM, Reis FJFB, Viana LC, Lacerda A, Dias JS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in congestive heart failure Transcranial Doppler evidence of microembolic etiology. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006; 64(2A):207–210. 10.1590/s0004-282x2006000200007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nisimura LM, Estato V, Souza EM, Reis PA, Lessa MA, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, et al. Acute Chagas Disease Induces Cerebral Microvasculopathy in Mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8(7):e2998 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roffê E, Silva AA, Marino AP, dos Santos PV, Lannes-Vieira J. Essential role of VLA-4/VCAM-1 pathway in the establishment of CD8+ T-cell-mediated Trypanosoma cruzi-elicited meningoencephalitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2003; 142(1–2):17–30. 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00254-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pereira IR, Vilar-Pereira G, Moreira OC, Ramos IP, Gibaldi D, Britto C, et al. Pentoxifylline reverses chronic experimental Chagasic cardiomyopathy in association with repositioning of abnormal CD8+ T-cell response. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9:e0003659 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Viotti R, Vigliano C, Lococo B, Bertocchi G, Petti M, Alvarez MG, et al. Long-Term Cardiac Outcomes of Treating Chronic Chagas Disease with Benznidazole versus No Treatment. A Nonrandomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006; 144(10):724–734. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Machado-de-Assis GF, Diniz GA, Montoya RA, Dias JCP, Coura JR, Machado-Coelho GLL, et al. A serological, parasitological and clinical evaluation of untreated Chagas disease patients and those treated with benznidazole before and thirteen years after intervention. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013; 108(7):873–880. 10.1590/0074-0276130122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Morillo CA, Marin-Neto JA, Avezum A, Sosa-Estani S, Rassi A Jr, Rosas F, et al. Randomized trial of benznidazole for chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(14):1295–1306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rassi A Jr, Marin-Neto JA, Rassi A. Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy: a review of the main pathogenic mechanisms and the efficacy of aetiological treatment following the BENznidazole Evaluation for Interrupting Trypanosomiasis (BENEFIT) trial. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017; 112(3):224–235. 10.1590/0074-02760160334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Soverow J, Hernandez S, Sanchez D, Forsyth C, Flores CA, Viana G, et al. Progression of Baseline Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Chagas Patients Undergoing Antitrypanosomal Treatment. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019; 6:ofz012 10.1093/ofid/ofz012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garcia S, Ramos CO, Senra JF, Vilas-Boas F, Rodrigues MM, Campos-de-Carvalho AC, et al. Treatment with benznidazole during the chronic phase of experimental Chagas' disease decreases cardiac alterations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49(4):1521–1528. 10.1128/AAC.49.4.1521-1528.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Silva RR, Mariante RM, Silva AA, dos Santos AL, Roffê E, Santiago H, et al. Interferon-gamma promotes infection of astrocytes by Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0118600 10.1371/journal.pone.0118600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Eichenbaum H. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in episodic memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017; 18(9):547–558. 10.1038/nrn.2017.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.De Queiroz AC, Castro Filho BG. Estudo do plexo coroide na infeccao chagasica experimental em camundongos. Acta Med. Port. 1985; 6(6):181–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Silva AA, Roffê E, Marino AP, dos Santos PV, Quirico-Santos T, Paiva CN, et al. Chagas' disease encephalitis: intense CD8+ lymphocytic infiltrate is restricted to the acute phase, but is not related to the presence of Trypanosoma cruzi antigens. Clin Immunol. 1999; 92(1):56–66. 10.1006/clim.1999.4716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rocha A, de Meneses AC, da Silva AM, Ferreira MS, Nishioka SA, Burgarelli MK, et al. Pathology of patients with Chagas' disease and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994; 50(3):261–268. 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fekadu A, Shibre T, Cleare AJ. Toxoplasmosis as a cause for behaviour disorders-overview of evidence and mechanisms. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2010; 57(2):105–113. 10.14411/fp.2010.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ronco MT, Manarin R, Francés D, Serra E, Revelli S, Carnovale C. Benznidazole treatment attenuates liver NF-kB activity and MAPK in a cecal ligation and puncture model of sepsis. Mol Immunol. 2011; 48(6–7):867–873. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Silva AA, Silva RR, Gibaldi D, Mariante RM, Dos Santos JB, Pereira IR, et al. Priming astrocytes with TNF enhances their susceptibility to Trypanosoma cruzi infection and creates a self-sustaining inflammatory milieu. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;182 10.1186/s12974-017-0952-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Becher B, Spath S, Goverman J. Cytokine networks in neuroinflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017; 17(1):49–59. 10.1038/nri.2016.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dawn-Linsley M, Ekinci FJ, Ortiz D, Rogers E, Shea TB. Monitoring thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARs) as an assay for oxidative damage in neuronal cultures and central nervous system. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141(2):219–222. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Baldissera MD, Souza CF, Carmo GM, Monteiro SG, Mendes RE, Stefani LM, et al. Relation between acetylcholinesterase and Na+, K+-ATPase activities with impaired memory of mice experimentally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. Microb Pathog. 2017; 111:75–80. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brazão V, Colato RP, Santello FH, Filipin MDV, Toldo MPA, Vale GT, et al. Interleukin-17, oxidative stress, and inflammation: role of melatonin during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Pineal Res. 2015; 59(4):488–496. 10.1111/jpi.12280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pedrosa RC, de Bem AF, Locatelli C, Pedrosa RC, Geremias R, Filho DW. Time-dependent oxidative stress caused by benznidazole. Redox Rep. 2001; 6(4):265–270. 10.1179/135100001101536328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Perin L, Silva RM, Fonseca KS, Cardoso JMO, Mathias FAS, Reis LES, et al. Pharmakokinetics and tissue distribution of Benznidazole after Oral Administration in Mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 61(4):e02410–16. 10.1128/AAC.02410-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Laurence Coutellier

20 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-30457

Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lannes-Vieira,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I have now received reports from two expert referees on your manuscript "Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue". Both reviewers found your work of interest; however, they raised some minor issues that will need to be addressed before further consideration. Mostly, details in the methods and results sections are lacking, and there are some important inconsistencies between reports of findings and explanation of methods. Altogether, the manuscript should be revised for grammar and typos mistakes.

I am enclosing the comments of the referees for a complete description of issues. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by 12/31/2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Laurence Coutellier, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors successfully show that T. cruzi infection leads to impairment of memory that is rescued by Bz therapy compared to non-infected controls. They could however benefit from revising the manuscript to make sure that terms and abbreviations are defined when 1st introduced. A few grammar changes could also be beneficial

Reviewer #2: The authors evaluated the effect of the experimental chronic T. cruzi infection (using a low inoculum of blood trypomastigotes of the Colombian strain) on the memory/learning process of C57BL/ 6 mice submitted or not for BZ treatment. They observed that BZ treatment hampered the progression of the habituation and aversive memory loss and reversed the recognition memory impairment caused by T. cruzi infection. These findings also were followed by reduction of parasitemia, parasite load and oxidative stress in the CNS.

The manuscript in general is well-written. The hypothesis and main research question are clearly presented. Experiments design and results are described in sufficient detail and the discussion are rich and very well elaborated. The results content supports the main conclusion. I will list only minor issues.

1- In methods section (Lines 126-128). Organize better the explanation about the group composition. It is very unclear for the reader.

2- Line 139. The serial passages were performed in which mice?

3- Regarding the qPCR. Did the authors use a murine normalizer primer? (i.e., b-act) How did the authors normalize the data gotten with Cruzi primers?

4- I got confused about the mice ages used in the experiments. In methods section, the authors clearly say they have used female of 5-7-weeks old. When you go to results section, line 360, the authors say “CNS structures were preserved in elderly NI control” but there is no description of the use of elderly mice in the methods nor in the legends. Further up, in the line 418 (discussion section) they mention: “Non-infected elderly C57BL/6 mice preserved the abilities to establish and evoke habituation, novel object recognition and aversive shock-evoked memory” again, these findings were not mentioned in the results and no description of elderly mice in methods nor in the legends. I also thought that these findings could be from the literature. In that case, they must be followed by reference.

5- Results section (Line 306). Rewrite please, very confuse. Also, in line 308 it seems that the authors did not finish the sentence: “…female mice were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly analyzed (Fig 1).” Analyzed for what?

6- Lines 342-344. The information is very unclear. BZ therapy did not impact body weight of which group? It is very confusing for the reader.

7- I missed a better explanation in the results section why the authors evaluated CNS parasite load (lines 375-380). This information is clearer in the discussion section, for example, the authors shortly mentioned they are evaluating the contribution of parasite persistence in CNS to memory impairment. A sentence like this should come in the first paragraph before the authors start to describe the findings in the line 375 to create a link between the previous results and parasite load evaluation.

8- Line 386: Please describe better the experiment. What is difference between 120dpi (pre-therapy) and 150 dpi BZ treatments? It is unclear.

9- Discussion section. Lines 457-458. I do not understand what the authors mean here. Please clarify.

10- Line 511. Fix the punctuation after the word ‘further’.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS review.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 5;16(1):e0244710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244710.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Dec 2020

Answers to reviewers

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-20-30457

Manuscript Title: Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

Dear Editor,

Firstly, we would like to thank the reviewers’ comments

Please find below point-by point answers to reviewers ‘comments.

Best regards,

Joseli Lannes

Reviewer #1:

Minor revisions

1. Line 52 please define Veh-treated infected mice – modified – line 50.

2. Lines 132-135 please define the abbreviations – clarified – line 133.

3. Line 202 please define NI – this sentence was modified – line 204-205 – NI has been previously defined - line 164.

4. Line 360 tell the reader here how you define ‘elderly’ – this was corrected. – line 365.

Thank you for bringing this issue. It was a misinterpretation, and your comment gave us the opportunity to clarify this point. In fact, the animals analysed in the present study were not elderly mice, but “mature adults”. Therefore, the term “elderly” has been withdrawn. We received the animal when they were 5-7-week old, kept for adaptation for 10-14 days. They were infected when 7-9-week-old (2 months - young adults) and analyzed at 120- or 150-days post-infection, (6-7-month-old mice). Thus, our mice were “mature adults”, as described by Flurkey K, Currer JM, Harrison DE. 2007. The Mouse in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research 2nd Edition. Fox JG, et al, editors. American College Laboratory Animal Medicine (Elsevier), Burlington, MA. pp. 637–672.

5. Line 364 kindly check the grammar for ‘tissues section’ sentence – corrected – lines 369-370.

6. Line 416 remind the reader how you determined ‘chronically infected mice did not display neuromuscular disorders’ – the sentence was modified – “…chronically infected mice did not display neuromuscular disorders assessed by grip strength meter test …” – lines 424-425.

7. Line 509 define ‘NF-kB- and MAPK’ – Rewritten “Interestingly, in a model of septic shock Bz showed down-regulatory effect on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production selectively linked to the nuclear factor NF-kB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways” – lines 518-520.

8. Line 520 define ‘TNFR1’ – defined – line 530-531

9. Line 532 define a ‘TBARS’ – It has been defined at line 286 and used several times in the Result and Discussion sections.

Reviewer #2:

1- In methods section (Lines 126-128). Organize better the explanation about the group composition. It is very unclear for the reader. – the description of the data was better organized and improved – lines 123 – 130.

2- Line 139. The serial passages were performed in which mice? – it was rephrased – “…and kept by serial passages in C57BL/6 female mice…” – line 141.

3- Regarding the qPCR. Did the authors use a murine normalizer primer? (i.e., b-act) How did the authors normalize the data gotten with Cruzi primers?

Yes. As explained at the Materials and methods section (subitem 2.10 – line 247-282), a commercial TaqMan system targeting mouse GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase VIC/TAMRA-labelled, Mm99999915g1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to quantify the brain tissue mg equivalents. The cortex or hippocampus mass equivalents were estimated by absolute quantification, using a standard curve generated by the serial dilution of DNA extracted from mouse cortex or hippocampus spiked with T. cruzi. Thus, the parasite load was normalized by the tissue mg equivalents, by dividing the T. cruzi quantity by the mass of mice tissue equivalents (cortex or hippocampus).

In order to clarify the normalization of parasite load, the following sentence was added at lines 279-280, at the new version of the manuscript: “…, by dividing the T. cruzi quantity by the mass of mice tissue equivalents (cortex or hippocampus)”.

4- I got confused about the mice ages used in the experiments. In methods section, the authors clearly say they have used female of 5-7-weeks old. When you go to results section, line 360, the authors say “CNS structures were preserved in elderly NI control” but there is no description of the use of elderly mice in the methods nor in the legends. Further up, in the line 418 (discussion section) they mention: “Non-infected elderly C57BL/6 mice preserved the abilities to establish and evoke habituation, novel object recognition and aversive shock-evoked memory” again, these findings were not mentioned in the results and no description of elderly mice in methods nor in the legends. I also thought that these findings could be from the literature. In that case, they must be followed by reference.

Thank you for bringing this issue. It was a misinterpretation, and your comment gave us the opportunity to clarify this point. In fact, the animals analysed in the present study were not elderly mice, but “mature adults”. Therefore, the term “elderly” has been withdrawn. We received the animal when they were 5-7-week old, kept for adaptation 10-14 days. They were infected when 7-9-week-old (2 months - young adults) and analyzed at 120- or 150-days post-infection, (6-7-month-old mice). Thus, our mice were “mature adults”, as described by Flurkey K, Currer JM, Harrison DE. 2007. The Mouse in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research 2nd Edition. Fox JG, et al, editors. American College Laboratory Animal Medicine (Elsevier), Burlington, MA. pp. 637–672.

There is no available data on elderly T. cruzi-infected mice in the literature. We have planned to approach this idea in the next study, analysing mice after 270 days post-infection (11 month-old mice; middle-aged animals), when most infected mice are still alive (70-80%). However, this study has been postponed by the epidemiological scenario of Covid-19.

5- Results section (Line 306). Rewrite please, very confuse. Also, in line 308 it seems that the authors did not finish the sentence: “…female mice were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly analyzed (Fig 1).” Analyzed for what?

The sentence was rewritten. Lines 310-312 – “Out of 92 C57BL/6 female mice, 25 were non-infected (NI) controls and 67 were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly monitored for parasitemia, body weight and clinical follow-up (Fig 1).”

6- Lines 342-344. The information is very unclear. BZ therapy did not impact body weight of which group? It is very confusing for the reader.

This sentence was rephrased. Lines 347-349 – “At 150 dpi, Bz therapy did not impact body weight (S2A Fig.), when compared to NI controls and Veh-treated infected and likened to T. cruzi-infected mice pre-therapy (at 120 dpi).”

7- I missed a better explanation in the results section why the authors evaluated CNS parasite load (lines 375-380). This information is clearer in the discussion section, for example, the authors shortly mentioned they are evaluating the contribution of parasite persistence in CNS to memory impairment. A sentence like this should come in the first paragraph before the authors start to describe the findings in the line 375 to create a link between the previous results and parasite load evaluation.

Lines 380-381 – the sentence added – “Next, we challenged the influence of parasite load in the CNS in behavioral alterations in chronically infected mice”.

8- Line 386: Please describe better the experiment. What is difference between 120dpi (pre-therapy) and 150 dpi BZ treatments? It is unclear.

These time points of analysis were better described in the Materials and methods section (lines 123-130) and in the Results section (lines 392-394).

9- Discussion section. Lines 457-458. I do not understand what the authors mean here. Please clarify.

We rephrased it – Lines 465-467 – “Bz therapy initiated after parasitemia control, in the early chronic phase of T. cruzi infection, reduced the severity of chronic heart disease at 8 months of infection [46]”.

10- Line 511. Fix the punctuation after the word ‘further’. – corrected. Line 521.

Answers to reviewers

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-20-30457

Manuscript Title: Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

Dear Editor,

Firstly, we would like to thank the reviewers’ comments

Please find below point-by point answers to reviewers ‘comments.

Best regards,

Joseli Lannes

Reviewer #1:

Minor revisions

1. Line 52 please define Veh-treated infected mice – modified – line 50.

2. Lines 132-135 please define the abbreviations – clarified – line 133.

3. Line 202 please define NI – this sentence was modified – line 204-205 – NI has been previously defined - line 164.

4. Line 360 tell the reader here how you define ‘elderly’ – this was corrected. – line 365.

Thank you for bringing this issue. It was a misinterpretation, and your comment gave us the opportunity to clarify this point. In fact, the animals analysed in the present study were not elderly mice, but “mature adults”. Therefore, the term “elderly” has been withdrawn. We received the animal when they were 5-7-week old, kept for adaptation for 10-14 days. They were infected when 7-9-week-old (2 months - young adults) and analyzed at 120- or 150-days post-infection, (6-7-month-old mice). Thus, our mice were “mature adults”, as described by Flurkey K, Currer JM, Harrison DE. 2007. The Mouse in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research 2nd Edition. Fox JG, et al, editors. American College Laboratory Animal Medicine (Elsevier), Burlington, MA. pp. 637–672.

5. Line 364 kindly check the grammar for ‘tissues section’ sentence – corrected – lines 369-370.

6. Line 416 remind the reader how you determined ‘chronically infected mice did not display neuromuscular disorders’ – the sentence was modified – “…chronically infected mice did not display neuromuscular disorders assessed by grip strength meter test …” – lines 424-425.

7. Line 509 define ‘NF-kB- and MAPK’ – Rewritten “Interestingly, in a model of septic shock Bz showed down-regulatory effect on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production selectively linked to the nuclear factor NF-kB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways” – lines 518-520.

8. Line 520 define ‘TNFR1’ – defined – line 530-531

9. Line 532 define a ‘TBARS’ – It has been defined at line 286 and used several times in the Result and Discussion sections.

Reviewer #2:

1- In methods section (Lines 126-128). Organize better the explanation about the group composition. It is very unclear for the reader. – the description of the data was better organized and improved – lines 123 – 130.

2- Line 139. The serial passages were performed in which mice? – it was rephrased – “…and kept by serial passages in C57BL/6 female mice…” – line 141.

3- Regarding the qPCR. Did the authors use a murine normalizer primer? (i.e., b-act) How did the authors normalize the data gotten with Cruzi primers?

Yes. As explained at the Materials and methods section (subitem 2.10 – line 247-282), a commercial TaqMan system targeting mouse GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase VIC/TAMRA-labelled, Mm99999915g1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to quantify the brain tissue mg equivalents. The cortex or hippocampus mass equivalents were estimated by absolute quantification, using a standard curve generated by the serial dilution of DNA extracted from mouse cortex or hippocampus spiked with T. cruzi. Thus, the parasite load was normalized by the tissue mg equivalents, by dividing the T. cruzi quantity by the mass of mice tissue equivalents (cortex or hippocampus).

In order to clarify the normalization of parasite load, the following sentence was added at lines 279-280, at the new version of the manuscript: “…, by dividing the T. cruzi quantity by the mass of mice tissue equivalents (cortex or hippocampus)”.

4- I got confused about the mice ages used in the experiments. In methods section, the authors clearly say they have used female of 5-7-weeks old. When you go to results section, line 360, the authors say “CNS structures were preserved in elderly NI control” but there is no description of the use of elderly mice in the methods nor in the legends. Further up, in the line 418 (discussion section) they mention: “Non-infected elderly C57BL/6 mice preserved the abilities to establish and evoke habituation, novel object recognition and aversive shock-evoked memory” again, these findings were not mentioned in the results and no description of elderly mice in methods nor in the legends. I also thought that these findings could be from the literature. In that case, they must be followed by reference.

Thank you for bringing this issue. It was a misinterpretation, and your comment gave us the opportunity to clarify this point. In fact, the animals analysed in the present study were not elderly mice, but “mature adults”. Therefore, the term “elderly” has been withdrawn. We received the animal when they were 5-7-week old, kept for adaptation 10-14 days. They were infected when 7-9-week-old (2 months - young adults) and analyzed at 120- or 150-days post-infection, (6-7-month-old mice). Thus, our mice were “mature adults”, as described by Flurkey K, Currer JM, Harrison DE. 2007. The Mouse in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research 2nd Edition. Fox JG, et al, editors. American College Laboratory Animal Medicine (Elsevier), Burlington, MA. pp. 637–672.

There is no available data on elderly T. cruzi-infected mice in the literature. We have planned to approach this idea in the next study, analysing mice after 270 days post-infection (11 month-old mice; middle-aged animals), when most infected mice are still alive (70-80%). However, this study has been postponed by the epidemiological scenario of Covid-19.

5- Results section (Line 306). Rewrite please, very confuse. Also, in line 308 it seems that the authors did not finish the sentence: “…female mice were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly analyzed (Fig 1).” Analyzed for what?

The sentence was rewritten. Lines 310-312 – “Out of 92 C57BL/6 female mice, 25 were non-infected (NI) controls and 67 were infected with 100 trypomastigote forms of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi and weekly monitored for parasitemia, body weight and clinical follow-up (Fig 1).”

6- Lines 342-344. The information is very unclear. BZ therapy did not impact body weight of which group? It is very confusing for the reader.

This sentence was rephrased. Lines 347-349 – “At 150 dpi, Bz therapy did not impact body weight (S2A Fig.), when compared to NI controls and Veh-treated infected and likened to T. cruzi-infected mice pre-therapy (at 120 dpi).”

7- I missed a better explanation in the results section why the authors evaluated CNS parasite load (lines 375-380). This information is clearer in the discussion section, for example, the authors shortly mentioned they are evaluating the contribution of parasite persistence in CNS to memory impairment. A sentence like this should come in the first paragraph before the authors start to describe the findings in the line 375 to create a link between the previous results and parasite load evaluation.

Lines 380-381 – the sentence added – “Next, we challenged the influence of parasite load in the CNS in behavioral alterations in chronically infected mice”.

8- Line 386: Please describe better the experiment. What is difference between 120dpi (pre-therapy) and 150 dpi BZ treatments? It is unclear.

These time points of analysis were better described in the Materials and methods section (lines 123-130) and in the Results section (lines 392-394).

9- Discussion section. Lines 457-458. I do not understand what the authors mean here. Please clarify.

We rephrased it – Lines 465-467 – “Bz therapy initiated after parasitemia control, in the early chronic phase of T. cruzi infection, reduced the severity of chronic heart disease at 8 months of infection [46]”.

10- Line 511. Fix the punctuation after the word ‘further’. – corrected. Line 521.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviwers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Laurence Coutellier

16 Dec 2020

Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

PONE-D-20-30457R1

Dear Dr. Lannes,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Laurence Coutellier, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All suggestions have been attended to satisfactorily. May I ask the authors to make sure they have used the same font color throughout the manuscript, and to please attend to line 50 and write vehicle-treated (veh-treated) so the reader knows to expect veh-treated later

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Sandra C Rocha

Acceptance letter

Laurence Coutellier

23 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-30457R1

Memory impairment in chronic experimental Chagas disease: benznidazole therapy reversed cognitive deficit in association with reduction of parasite load and oxidative stress in the nervous tissue

Dear Dr. Lannes-Vieira:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Laurence Coutellier

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. The arrive essential 10: Author checklist.

    (PDF)

    S1 Fig. Beneficial effect of benznidazole administration on splenomegaly of chronically Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57BL/6 mice.

    C57BL/6 mice were infected with 100 blood trypomastigotes of the Colombian strain of T. cruzi, and treated with Veh or Bz, as described in legend of Fig 3. (A) Body weight (g). (B) Relative spleen weight (mg/g). Data represent two independent experiments with 3 NI controls and 5 infected mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Data are shown as means ± SE and were analyzed using ANOVA-Bonferroni posttest. *, p<0.05 and ***, p<0.001, comparing T. cruzi-infected and NI mice; ##, p<0.01, comparing Bz-treated and Veh-treated T. cruzi-infected.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviwers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES