Abstract
Background: Colistin resistance is a major breach in our last line of defense and without urgent action, we are heading for a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries can once again kill. To the best of our knowledge, the use of the bibliometric analytical technique for examining colistin resistance-related research does not exist in the literature.
Methods: Here, we analyze and present bibliometric indicators of the global literature in colistin resistance research. The Scopus database was searched for articles on colistin resistance. The articles retrieved were analyzed using the bibliometrix R-package.
Results: A total of 1105 publications were retrieved. There was a noticeable increase in the number of publications on colistin resistance research in the past decade. Six journals made up the core zone in colistin research and produced 35.83% of the published articles. The analysis across time-intervals revealed several keywords that had increased or decreased in usage when comparing the interval between 1973-2009 and 2010-2019. Authors’ keywords “Acinetobacter baumanii”, and “ Pseudomonas aeruginosa” were the most frequent encountered during the period of 1973-2009, while “ mcr-1”, “ Enterobacteriaceae”, “ Escherichia coli”, and “ Klebsiella pneumoniae” emerged in the past decade.
Conclusions: There has been a significant growth in publications on colistin resistance in the past decade, suggesting an urgent need for action by different stakeholders to contain this threat of colistin resistance. Keyword analysis revealed temporal changes in the types of keywords used across time-intervals. These findings summarize a general vision on colistin resistance research and will serve as baseline data for future comparative purposes.
Keywords: colistin resistance, mcr-1, keywords, bibliometric analysis
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), antibiotic resistance is one of today's greatest threats to global health, food security, and development 1. The emergence and unprecedented spread of carbapenemases have led to a resurgence in the use of last-line antibiotic colistin as salvage therapy 2– 5.
Colistin or polymyxin E is a polypeptide antibiotic developed in the 1950s. Originally, the antibiotic was isolated from the soil bacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa subsp 6. Though withdrawn from clinical use in the 1980s owing to its significant toxicity, it has been re-introduced for the treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, particularly carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections 4, 5, 7, 8. It acts by interfering with bacterial cell membranes and/or the inhibition of bacterial respiration 9, 10.
In 2016, the first plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, was detected in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae 11. Since then, several variants of mcr-1 and novel families of mcr genes have been identified in a variety of samples 12– 18. Colistin resistance is a major breach in our last line of defense and without urgent action, we are heading for a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries can once again kill.
Bibliometrics is the branch of library science that applies mathematical and statistical techniques to analyze articles, reviews, editorial letters, books, and other documents 19. This is an important tool to assess new trends in scientific research. To the best of our knowledge, the use of the bibliometric analytical technique for examining colistin resistance-related research does not exist in the literature. Here, we analyze and present bibliometric indicators of the global literature in colistin resistance research.
Methods
Literature search
Articles on colistin resistance published in the literature were retrieved from the Scopus database on November 15, 2019. Keywords used for data extraction were obtained from published review articles on colistin resistance 20– 22. The search query used for data extraction was: TITLE-ABS-KEY ("colistin resistance" OR "polymyxin E resistance").
Study selection
Two authors independently performed the literature search using EndNote X9 (Bld 12062) produced by Clarivate Analytics. Papers published between January 1, 1973 and 31 December 2019 were included. After removal of duplicate results, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance to the research question. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus of the two authors. Experimental studies and studies that reported colistin sensitive bacteria were not eligible for inclusion. Searches were restricted to studies published in the English language.
Analysis methods
According to similar previously published bibliometric studies, selected documents were analyzed by different standard indicators including total number of publications, document types, countries/territories, authors, sources, total number of citations, h-index, average number of citations per publication, international collaborations and Bradford division analysis using the bibliometrix R-package 23, 24. Furthermore, graphs were plotted for visualization of co-citation networks and keyword co-occurrence of the text corpus extracted from the title and the abstract fields of the articles 25. Co-citation has been defined as any two items (authors) that have been jointly cited by another item (author). To determine temporal changes in the type of keywords in colistin resistance research, analysis was carried out for two-time intervals of the study period: period 1, representing 1973 to 2009, and period 2, from 2010 to 2019. All data analysis was performed using the open-source bibliometrix R-package 26 on RStudio version 1.2.1335 (Boston, MA). The bibliometrix R-package provides a set of functions for quantitative research in bibliometric, including: (1) data loading and conversion to R dataframe (readFiles(), convert2df()), (2) data analysis (summary() and plot(), citations(), local citations(), Hindex(), lotka(), keywordGrowth(), keywordAssociation()), and (3) data visualization (biblioNetwork(), histNetwork()) 26.
Results
Publications outputs and trends
A total of 1578 non duplicate publications indexed in Scopus were retrieved on November 15, 2019. Of the 1578 studies, 1105 met the inclusion criteria and were used for the bibliometric analysis ( Figure 1) 27. The result of distribution by time indicates that the literature in this field was first published in 1973. A significant increase occurred in the number of publications from 35 in the period 1973-2009 to 1070 in the past decade (P value <0.001). Most of the publications were original research studies ( n = 862; 78.01%), followed by editorial letters ( n = 124; 11.22%), and reviews ( n = 65; 5.88%).
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the selection process of the included studies.
Sources analysis
The top 10 cited papers, their citation frequency and titles are listed in Table 1. The most-cited article ( n = 1632) was written by Liu et al. (2016), followed by papers authored by Olaitan et al. (2014) ( n = 412) and Moffatt et al. (2010) ( n = 336). The top 10 preferred sources for publishing documents on colistin resistance are shown in Table 2. Bradford division analysis shows six sources in the core zone. These six sources are Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, Frontiers in Microbiology, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, and The Lancet Infectious Diseases, which produced 35.83% of the published articles.
Table 1. The top 10 cited papers.
Top ten most cited original articles | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | Year | Source | Title | TC | TCperYear a | |
1 | Liu et al. 11 | 2016 | Lancet Infect Dis | Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance
mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study |
1632 | 544.00 |
2 | Moffatt et al. 28 | 2010 | Antimicrob Agents
Chemother |
Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated
by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production |
336 | 37.30 |
3 | Adams et al. 29 | 2009 | Antimicrob Agents
Chemother |
Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii
associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system |
247 | 24.70 |
4 | Tumbarello et al. 30 | 2015 | J Antimicrob
Chemother |
Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella
pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study |
232 | 58.00 |
5 | Yin et al. 15 | 2017 | MBio | Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in
Escherichia coli |
204 | 102.00 |
6 | Hasman et al. 31 | 2015 | Eurosurveillance | Detection of mcr-1 encoding plasmid-mediated colistin-
resistant Escherichia coli isolates from human bloodstream infection and imported chicken meat, Denmark 2015 |
199 | 49.80 |
7 | Beceiro et al. 32 | 2011 | Antimicrob Agents
Chemother |
Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-
resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system |
195 | 24.40 |
8 | Carattoli et al. 33 | 2017 | Eurosurveillance | Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene
in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016 |
161 | 80.50 |
9 | Capone et al. 34 | 2013 | Clin Microbiol Infect | High rate of colistin resistance among patients with
carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection accounts for an excess of mortality |
160 | 26.70 |
10 | Hussein et al. 35 | 2009 | Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol |
Impact of carbapenem resistance on the outcome of
patients' hospital-acquired bacteraemia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae |
160 | 16.00 |
Top ten most cited review articles | ||||||
1 | Olaitan et al. 36 | 2014 | Frontiers in
Microbiology |
Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: Acquired and
intrinsic resistance in bacteria |
412 | 58.85 |
2 | Cai et al. 37 | 2012 | J Antimicrob
Chemother |
Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical
reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies |
284 | 40.57 |
3 | Poirel et al. 6 | 2017 | Clinical Microbiology
Reviews |
Polymyxins: Antibacterial activity, susceptibility testing,
and resistance mechanisms encoded by plasmids or chromosomes |
241 | 34.42 |
4 | Lim et al. 38 | 2010 | Pharmacotherapy | Resurgence of colistin: a review of resistance, toxicity,
pharmacodynamics, and dosing |
182 | 20.22 |
5 | Yahav et al. 39 | 2012 | Clin Microbiol Infect | Colistin: new lessons on an old antibiotic | 136 | 19.43 |
6 | Barbier et al. 40 | 2013 | Curr Opin Pulm Med | Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated
pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management |
111 | 18.50 |
7 | Ruppe E et al. 41 | 2015 | Ann Intensive Care | Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative
bacilli |
101 | 25.25 |
8 | Bialvaei et al. 42 | 2015 | Curr Med Res Opin | Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance | 91 | 22.75 |
9 | Catry et al. 43 | 2015 | Int J Antimicrob
Agents |
Use of colistin-containing products within the European
Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA): development of resistance in animals and possible impact on human and animal health |
69 | 17.25 |
10 | Sun et al. 44 | 2018 | Trends Microbiol | Towards understanding MCR-like colistin resistance | 65 | 65.00 |
aBy the end of year 2018; TC, total citation.
Table 2. The top 10 sources that published articles in colistin resistance research.
Rank | Sources | Articles | % |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Antimicrobial Agents And Chemotherapy | 126 | 44.37% |
2 | Journal Of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 79 | 27.82% |
3 | International Journal Of Antimicrobial Agents | 73 | 25.70% |
4 | Frontiers In Microbiology | 44 | 15.49% |
5 | Journal Of Global Antimicrobial Resistance | 40 | 14.08% |
6 | Lancet Infectious Diseases | 34 | 11.97% |
7 | Microbial Drug Resistance | 29 | 10.21% |
8 | Infection And Drug Resistance | 23 | 8.10% |
9 | Eurosurveillance | 22 | 7.75% |
10 | Clinical Microbiology And Infection | 20 | 7.04% |
Countries/regions analysis
The top 10 most productive territories included two Asian countries, seven European countries and one country in North America. China dominated the literature in colistin resistance research with 212 items (19.18%), followed distantly by the USA ( n = 166; 15.02%) and France ( n = 120; 10.85%). China also had the highest citation frequency ( Figure 2). International collaboration analysis for active countries is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2. Top 10 countries with the most publications.
Figure 3. International collaboration analysis for top 30 active countries.
Each node in the figure symbolizes a different country’ collaboration with other countries. The node’s diameter corresponds to the strength of collaboration. Links represent international collaboration pathways between countries. Cluster of countries having similar cluster color most probably represents a closely related research group. Links represent the strength of collaboration.
Author analysis
The 1105 publications were written by 5141 authors working on this subject. Author analysis highlighted 0.215 documents per author, 4.65 authors per document, and 7.37 co-authors per document, with a collaboration index of 4.74. A co-citation network of authors showed four clusters: the blue cluster dominated by Liu 2016; the red cluster dominated by Olaitan 2014; the green cluster dominated by Falagas 2005 and the purple cluster dominated by Xavier 2016 ( Figure 4).
Figure 4. The co-citation network map of references from publications in colistin resistance research.
Each node in the network symbolizes a different author’ co-citation. The node’s diameter corresponds to the strength of co-citation. Links represent co-citation pathways between authors. Co-citation network of authors showed four clusters. Links diameter represent the strength of co-citation.
Keywords analysis
Temporal changes in the type of keywords were observed between the period 1 (1973 to 2009) and period 2 (2010 to 2019) ( Table 3).
Table 3. Types of keywords observed in period 1 (1973-2009) and period 2 (2010-2019).
Period 2 (2010 – 2019) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Author keywords (DE) | Articles | Keywords-
Plus (ID) |
Articles | |
1 | Colistin resistance | 232 | Colistin | 1834 |
2 | Colistin | 213 | Antibiotic resistance | 895 |
3 | mcr-1 | 196 | Escherichia coli | 802 |
4 | Escherichia coli | 85 | Nonhuman | 769 |
5 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 80 | Bacterial | 756 |
6 | Acinetobacter baumannii | 63 | Article | 689 |
7 | Antibiotic resistance | 59 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | 598 |
8 | Antimicrobial resistance | 52 | Human | 597 |
9 | Enterobacteriaceae | 51 | Drug resistance | 583 |
10 | Resistance | 45 | Anti bacterial agents | 527 |
Period 1 (1973 – 2009) | ||||
1 | Colistin | 12 | Colistin | 56 |
2 | Acinetobacter baumannii | 5 | Article | 28 |
3 | Cystic fibrosis | 4 | Antibiotic resistance | 26 |
4 | Resistance | 4 | Drug resistance | 26 |
5 | Colistin resistance | 3 | Acinetobacter baumannii | 24 |
6 | Polymyxin | 3 | Bacterial | 22 |
7 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 3 | Nonhuman | 21 |
8 | Acinetobacter | 2 | Anti bacterial agents | 19 |
9 | Antibiotic resistance | 2 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 18 |
10 | Etest | 2 | Humans | 16 |
Discussion
The aim of this study was to analyze the global scientific outputs of colistin resistance research and show the trends and current status in colistin resistance research. The publication trend showed a significant increase in the number of publications, particularly in the past decade, from 2010 to 2019, which corresponds with the peak clinical interest in its use as antibiotic of choice against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. This trend reflects the increasing attention paid by different stakeholders to concerns about colistin resistance worldwide and shows that research aiming to reduce the threat of colistin resistance is gaining attention in the scientific community.
Bradford division analysis showed a high concentration (35.83%) of publications in a few journals, namely Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, Frontiers in Microbiology, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, and The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Four of these six sources are exclusively dedicated to antimicrobials, which is consistent with the global effort against antimicrobial resistance.
China was the leading country for publications related to colistin resistance, contributing 19.18% of all Scopus database articles published during the period of study. This may be due to the widespread use of colistin in animal feedstock and agriculture in China 45. Moreover, the fact that China was the first country where a plasmid-mediated mechanism of colistin resistance, the mobilizable colistin resistance gene-1 ( mcr-1), was reported, may be a contributing factor to China’s commitment 11. The majority of publications on colistin resistance research were produced by high-income countries, with a negligible contribution from low- and middle-income countries, particularly Africa, no countries in which were on the list of the top ten most productive countries. Several previous bibliometric studies of the literature have also reported a similar distribution of research publications in different fields from high-income countries 23, 46, 47. This poor research output from African countries could be due to the lack of funding and poor facilities.
With regards to keywords, the analysis across time-intervals revealed that several keywords have increased or decreased in usage when comparing the interval between 1973-2009 and 2010-2019. This shows a temporal change in the type of keywords. Keywords “ mcr-1”, “ Enterobacteriaceae”, “ Escherichia coli”, and “ Klebsiella pneumoniae”, which were absent from 1973 to 2009, have emerged in the past decade. This could be attributed to the fact that until the first report of mcr-1 gene, colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae was believed to be chromosomally mediated 36. However, since 2016, the mcr-1 gene was reported in Enterobacteriaceae recovered from food, animals, and human specimens in China, and it has subsequently been reported worldwide 11, 48– 53. The wide spread of the mcr-1 dramatically challenges the newly renewed interest in colistin for clinical use and opens a new research topic on colistin. Currently, eight new mcr genotypes ( mcr-2 to mcr-9) have been reported since the discovery of mcr-1 14– 18, 33, 54, 55. Furthermore, colistin-resistant bacteria without prior colistin exposure, possibly due to cross-resistance between colistin and cationic antimicrobials such as LL-37 and lysozyme, have also been reported 56, 57.
Unsurprisingly, the article “ Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism mcr-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study,” published by the Lancet 11 was the most cited article.
Country collaboration in colistin resistance research remains relatively weak. This raises the fundamental question of global collaboration to slow the development and spread of colistin resistance 58. Country collaboration may be the most practical solution to this transmissible plasmid-mediated resistance in the era of globalization, with increased migration, trade and travel. Indeed, horizontal transfer of mcr-mediated colistin resistance is a rapid phenomenon, and can not only occur at a rather high frequency but can also disseminate across different bacterial species. Following its first description, plasmid- mcr has now been reported across all seven continents 59.
Strengths and limitations of research
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to initiate baseline data on bibliometrics in colistin resistance research. The study was not limited by language and a large literature including original articles, reviews, editorial letters and meeting abstracts published over a long period was included. The Scopus database covers the vast majority of online research, particularly broader biomedical research, and it has been established that it is the most user-friendly and easiest tool to use for bibliometric analysis services 60, 61. Furthermore, comprehensive and relatively objective data analysis was performed, which clearly highlighted the past and current status of colistin resistance research and predicted the future research frontier.
However, this global study is characterized by a number of limitations that are inherent in bibliometric analysis 62. The main limitation of the present data is the reliance solely upon the Scopus database, which did not represent all the literature. Despite the fact that the Scopus database is considered an excellent source for bibliometric analysis, there are some journals that contain publications on colistin resistance but are not indexed in Scopus and therefore were not counted. Furthermore, we included papers where colistin resistance or polymyxin E resistance was used in the title or abstract or keywords; that inclusion of search items gives a much lower sensitivity to the search.
Conclusions
There has been a significant growth of publications on colistin resistance in the past decade, suggesting an urgent need for action by different stakeholders to contain this threat of colistin resistance. Unsurprisingly, an article on mcr-1 gene research ranked first among the top ten most cited articles on colistin resistance. Keyword analysis revealed temporal changes in the types of keywords used across time-intervals. These findings summarize a general vision on colistin resistance research and will serve as baseline data for future comparative purposes.
Data availability
Underlying data
Figshare: Full list of included studies .bib. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12673151.v1 27.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Maxime Descartes Mbogning Fonkou (Aix Marseille University) for his collaboration in the preliminary data collection and valuable comments.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
References
- 1. WHO: Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance.Resolution WHA68.7. Agenda item 15.1.2015; [cited 20 May 2020]. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 2. Trecarichi EM, Tumbarello M: Therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Virulence. 2017;8(4):470–84. 10.1080/21505594.2017.1292196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Paul M, Daikos GL, Durante-Mangoni E, et al. : Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(4):391–400. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30099-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhang X, Gu B, Mei Y, et al. : Increasing resistance rate to carbapenem among blood culture isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a university-affiliated hospital in China, 2004–2011. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2015;68(2):115–20. 10.1038/ja.2014.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Theuretzbacher U, Van Bambeke F, Cantón R, et al. : Reviving old antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(8):2177–81. 10.1093/jac/dkv157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Poirel L, Jayol A, Nordmann P: Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(2):557–96. 10.1128/CMR.00064-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Biswas S, Brunel JM, Dubus JC, et al. : Colistin: an update on the antibiotic of the 21st century. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(8):917–34. 10.1586/eri.12.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giamarellou H: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: how to treat and for how long. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36 Suppl 2:S50–4. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Deris ZZ, Akter J, Sivanesan S, et al. : A secondary mode of action of polymyxins against Gram-negative bacteria involves the inhibition of NADH-quinone oxidoreductase activity. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2014;67(2):147–51. 10.1038/ja.2013.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hancock REW, Chapple DS: Peptide Antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(6):1317–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, et al. : Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhao F, Feng Y, Lü X, et al. : Remarkable Diversity of Escherichia coli Carrying mcr-1 from Hospital Sewage with the Identification of Two New mcr-1 Variants. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2094. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. : Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):122. 10.1038/s41426-018-0124-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yang YQ, Li YX, Lei CW, et al. : Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1791–5. 10.1093/jac/dky111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, et al. : Novel Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2017;8(3):e01166–17. 10.1128/mBio.00543-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, et al. : Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(27):30280. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.27.30280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Borowiak M, Fischer J, Hammerl JA, et al. : Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3317–24. 10.1093/jac/dkx327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Carroll LM, Gaballa A, Guldimann C, et al. : Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio. 2019;10(3):e00853–19. 10.1128/mBio.00853-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pritchard A: Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25(4):348–9. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 20. Malchione MD, Torres LM, Hartley DM, et al. : Carbapenem and colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae in Southeast Asia: Review and mapping of emerging and overlapping challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;54(4):381–99. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Barlaam A, Parisi A, Spinelli E, et al. : Global Emergence of Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli in Food Chains and Associated Food Safety Implications: A Review. J Food Prot. 2019;82(8):1440–8. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Granata G, Petrosillo N: Resistance to Colistin in Klebsiella Pneumoniae: A 4.0 Strain? Infect Dis Rep. 2017;9(2):7104. 10.4081/idr.2017.7104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Díaz I, Cortey M, Olvera À,, et al. : Use of H-Index and Other Bibliometric Indicators to Evaluate Research Productivity Outcome on Swine Diseases. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149690. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Venable GT, Shepherd BA, Loftis CM, et al. : Bradford’s law: identification of the core journals for neurosurgery and its subspecialties. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(2):569–79. 10.3171/2015.3.JNS15149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Radhakrishnan S, Erbis S, Isaacs JA, et al. : Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172778. 10.1371/journal.pone.0172778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Aria M, Cuccurullo C: bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959–75. 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yacouba A, Olowo-okere A: Full list of included studies .bib.figshare. Dataset.2020. 10.6084/m9.figshare.12673151.v1 [DOI]
- 28. Moffatt JH, Harper M, Harrison P, et al. : Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(12):4971–7. 10.1128/AAC.00834-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Adams MD, Nickel GC, Bajaksouzian S, et al. : Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):3628–34. 10.1128/AAC.00284-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, De Rosa FG, et al. : Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(7):2133–43. 10.1093/jac/dkv086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hasman H, Hammerum AM, Hansen F, et al. : Detection of mcr-1 encoding plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from human bloodstream infection and imported chicken meat, Denmark 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(49).1–5. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Beceiro A, Llobet E, Aranda J, et al. : Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3370–9. 10.1128/AAC.00079-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Carattoli A, Villa L, Feudi C, et al. : Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(31):30589. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.31.30589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Capone A, Giannella M, Fortini D, et al. : High rate of colistin resistance among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection accounts for an excess of mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(1):E23–E30. 10.1111/1469-0691.12070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Hussein K, Raz-Pasteur A, Finkelstein R, et al. : Impact of carbapenem resistance on the outcome of patients’ hospital-acquired bacteraemia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(4):307–13. 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain JM: Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:643. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cai Y, Chai D, Wang R, et al. : Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(7):1607–15. 10.1093/jac/dks084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lim LM, Ly N, Anderson D, et al. : Resurgence of Colistin: A Review of Resistance, Toxicity, Pharmacodynamics, and Dosing. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30(12):1279–91. 10.1592/phco.30.12.1279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yahav D, Farbman L, Leibovici L, et al. : Colistin: new lessons on an old antibiotic. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(1):18–29. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03734.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Barbier F, Andremont A, Wolff M, et al. : Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: recent advances in epidemiology and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2013;19(3):216–28. 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f27be [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ruppé É, Woerther PL, Barbier F: Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):61. 10.1186/s13613-015-0061-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bialvaei AZ, Kafil HS: Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(4):707–21. 10.1185/03007995.2015.1018989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Catry B, Cavaleri M, Baptiste K, et al. : Use of colistin-containing products within the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA): development of resistance in animals and possible impact on human and animal health. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46(3):297–306. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sun J, Zhang H, Liu YH, et al. : Towards Understanding MCR-like Colistin Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(9):794–808. 10.1016/j.tim.2018.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Huang X, Yu L, Chen X, et al. : High Prevalence of Colistin Resistance and mcr-1 Gene in Escherichia coli Isolated from Food Animals in China. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:562. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Al-Jabi SW, et al. : Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on carbapenem resistance (1986–2015). Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016;15(1):56 10.1186/s12941-016-0169-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Zyoud SH, et al. : Global research output in antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens: A bibliometric analysis (2002–2016). J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;13:104–14. 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Gutiérrez C, Zenis J, Legarraga P, et al. : Genetic analysis of the first mcr-1 positive Escherichia coli isolate collected from an outpatient in Chile. Braz J Infect Dis. 2019;23(3):203–6. 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Sulaiman AAA, Kassem II: First report on the detection of the plasmid-borne colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in multi-drug resistant E. coli isolated from domestic and sewer waters in Syrian refugee camps in Lebanon. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019;30:117–20. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rhouma M, Thériault W, Rabhi N, et al. : First identification of mcr-1/ mcr-2 genes in the fecal microbiota of Canadian commercial pigs during the growing and finishing period. Vet Med (Auckl). 2019;10:65–7. 10.2147/VMRR.S202331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Ageevets V, Lazareva I, Mrugova T, et al. : IncX4 plasmids harbouring mcr-1 genes: Further dissemination. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:166–7. 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Newton-Foot M, Snyman Y, Maloba MRB, et al. : Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 colistin resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. clinical isolates from the Western Cape region of South Africa. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:78. 10.1186/s13756-017-0234-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tarabai H, Valcek A, Jamborova I, et al. : Plasmid-Mediated mcr-1 Colistin Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Black Kite in Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(9):e01266–19. 10.1128/AAC.01266-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. : Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8, in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):122–122. 10.1038/s41426-018-0124-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. AbuOun M, Stubberfield EJ, Duggett NA, et al. : mcr-1 and mcr-2 ( mcr-6.1) variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great Britain from 2014 to 2015. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(10):2745–9. 10.1093/jac/dky272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Napier BA, Burd EM, Satola SW, et al. : Clinical Use of Colistin Induces Cross-Resistance to Host Antimicrobials in Acinetobacter baumannii. mBio. 2013;4(3):e00021–13. 10.1128/mBio.00021-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain JM: Emergence of colistin-resistant bacteria in humans without colistin usage: a new worry and cause for vigilance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47(1):1–3. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.11.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Piffaretti JC: Antibiotic resistance: the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance enhances the need of a proactive one-health approach. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(5):fnw034. 10.1093/femsle/fnw034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Nang SC, Li J, Velkov T: The rise and spread of mcr plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2019;45(2):131–61. 10.1080/1040841X.2018.1492902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, et al. : Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2007;22(2):338–342. 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Kokol P, Vošner HB: Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(1):81. 10.5195/jmla.2018.181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Belter CW: Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2015;103(4):219–21. 10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]