Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Medical Case Reports
. 2021 Jan 5;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02592-6

Clostridium difficile appendicitis in an immunocompromised patient: a case report and review of the literature

Charles Dac Pham 1,, Duong Tommy Hua 1
PMCID: PMC7786947  PMID: 33402156

Abstract

Background

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a common cause of infectious colitis in individuals with prior antibiotic or hospital exposure. Extraintestinal manifestations of C. difficile infections, however, are rare. Here we present a case of C. difficile appendicitis in an immunocompromised patient.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency room for two days of lower abdominal pain associated with nausea and subjective fevers. He otherwise denied having diarrhea or hematochezia. He did not have any recent hospitalizations, nursing home stays, or antibiotic exposure. His past medical history was notable for stage III tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma for which he was status post tonsillectomy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy (cisplatin 4 days prior to presentation). He was afebrile with tenderness to palpation in the bilateral lower quadrants, right greater than left. His white blood cell (WBC) count was 15.6 × 103 cells/μL. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis showed marked edema and inflammation of the cecum and ascending colon as well as an enlarged appendix with surrounding inflammatory changes with a small amount of free fluid in the right paracolic gutter. He was treated non-surgically with antibiotics. He did not clinically improve and on hospital day 3, he developed diarrhea for which C. difficile stool polymerase chain reaction was sent. Repeat CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed which showed progression to pan-colitis and persistent appendicitis. C. difficile testing later resulted positive, for which oral vancomycin was started. The patient markedly improved with medical management alone and was subsequently discharged on oral vancomycin.

Conclusions

Our case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for C. difficile in a patient presenting with both appendicitis and colitis, with prompt diagnosis and treatment being essential.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile, Appendicitis, Extraintestinal, Extracolonic

Background

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is an anaerobic, gram-positive spore-forming bacillus that is commonly found as part of the human colonic flora. It is one of the most common causes of healthcare—associated infections in the United States, with recent estimates suggesting an estimated 450,000 individuals affected annually [1]. While C. difficile infection (CDI) is commonly associated with colitis, extraintestinal manifestations account for just 0.17% of cases, with many of these patients having significant comorbidities, a history of prior antibiotic use, and/or concurrent intestinal involvement [2]. Given the paucity of data, the role of C. difficile in the pathogenesis of extraintestinal infections remains unclear. Here we present a rare case of C. difficile appendicitis in an immunocompromised patient.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency room for two days of lower abdominal pain associated with nausea, non-bilious vomiting, and subjective fevers. He otherwise denied having diarrhea, hematochezia, melena, or dysuria. He did not have any recent hospitalizations, nursing home stays, or antibiotic exposure. He denied recent travel, sick contacts, or dietary changes. His past medical history is notable for stage III tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma for which he was status post tonsillectomy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy (cisplatin 4 days prior to presentation).

He was afebrile (36.9 °C) with a pulse of 110 beats per minute and blood pressure of 134/94 mmHg. Physical exam was notable for a non-distended abdomen, tenderness to palpation in the bilateral lower quadrants (right greater than left), and no rebound or guarding.

Laboratory examination was pertinent for a white blood cell (WBC) count of 15.6 × 103 cells/μL (reference range 4.5–10 cells/μL), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 24 mg/dL (reference range 8–20 mg/dL), creatinine of 1.35 mg/dL (reference range 0.64–1.27 mg/dL), and lactate 2.6 mmol/L (reference range 0.5–2.2 mmol/L). Computed tomography (CT) with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis showed marked edema and inflammation of the cecum and ascending colon as well as an enlarged appendix with surrounding inflammatory changes with a small amount of free fluid in the right paracolic gutter. The patient was fluid resuscitated and started on broad spectrum antibiotics with cefepime and metronidazole. Surgery was consulted due to concern for appendicitis. They deferred surgical intervention given that it was unclear if this represented colitis with secondary inflammation of the appendix rather than a direct appendiceal source. Conservative treatment with antibiotics was recommended with plans for operative management if the patient failed to improve.

On hospital days 1–2, the patient continued to have significant abdominal pain, which started to localize more to the right lower quadrant. He continued to deny any diarrhea and remained afebrile. His WBC count remained elevated, but his creatinine improved after fluids. On hospital day 3, the patient started having diarrhea for which C. difficile testing was sent. Because the patient was not clinically improving, repeat CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast (Fig. 1) was performed which showed progression of his colitis, now extending from the cecum to the rectum as well as findings concerning for appendicitis as seen on the prior CT scan. C. difficile testing was positive for which the patient was started on oral vancomycin. On hospital days 4–6, the patient’s symptoms and exam markedly improved with normalization of his WBC count. Surgery continued to recommend non-surgical management given significant clinical improvement with antibiotics alone. The patient was discharged on hospital day 7 with oral vancomycin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Coronal (a) and sagittal (b) CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast demonstrating enlargement of the appendix with wall thickening and enhancement (red arrows). Periappendiceal inflammation is also present (yellow arrow)

Discussion

Extraintestinal CDI is rare and has been described in only a limited number of reports. Examples of extraintestinal manifestations that have been reported include bacteremia (with one patient having C. difficile isolated in an abdominal aneurysm), intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, cellulitis, reactive arthritis, osteomyelitis, brain abscess, and empyema [2, 3]. Acute appendicitis is another one of the rare extracolonic manifestation of CDI as we have described here in our case. From review of the literature, there have been very few reported cases of C. difficile appendicitis [4-7].

C. difficile has generally been known as a pathogen responsible for colitis, particularly in the setting of prior antibiotic or hospital exposure. Recent chemotherapy is also another important risk factor [8], which was the case in our patient as he was actively undergoing treatment for his tonsillar cancer. It has been hypothesized that the disruption of the gut microbiota allows for the proliferation of toxigenic C. difficile and subsequent infection. C. difficile colitis is a process mediated by bacterial release of Toxins A and B, whose role is to inactivate members of the Rho family of guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), which leads to colonocyte death, inflammation, and loss of the intestinal epithelial barrier function [9]. The pathogenesis of extraintestinal CDI, however, remains unclear. However, given his concurrent pancolitis, it is likely that direct spread of C. difficile from the intestinal lumen resulted in his appendicitis. This is in opposition to C. difficile isolated from distant sites described in other case series, where it is thought that bacterium enters through blood circulation [2].

Two possible mechanisms for C. difficile appendicitis have been suggested: direct infection from the toxin itself versus obstruction of the appendiceal lumen from the adjacent colitis [5]. It is plausible that both of these processes play a role, as the luminal obstruction can lead to ischemia and compromise of the mucosal barrier, resulting in bacterial invasion of the appendix by intraluminal bacteria [10]. When this occurs, a mix of aerobic and anaerobic organisms, particularly Escherichia coli and Bacteroides spp., are typically implicated [11], as opposed to C. difficile which is exceedingly uncommon as detailed in our case.

We should also note that the role of C. difficile in causing extraintestinal infections have been questioned. One case series showed that many isolates were either part of polymicrobial flora or intra-abdominal fluid collections near the colon in the setting of recent fecal spillage [3]. Furthermore, it has been found that not all extraintestinal C. difficile isolates produce toxins [3], which is essential in the pathogenesis of C. difficile colitis as discussed above (therefore, culture, while the most sensitive test for C. difficile infection [8], has largely been replaced by methods that detect toxigenic strains). While it is certainly possible that the patient’s C. difficile colitis (as confirmed by stool PCR testing) and his appendicitis represented distinct and unrelated processes, the clinical presentation, radiographic features, and overwhelming response to C. difficile directed antibiotic therapy suggests that C. difficile was the most likely underlying etiology.

Given the rarity of C. difficile appendicitis, no specific treatment guidelines exist. We performed a literature review to explore the demographics, management, and outcomes of those with C. difficile appendicitis (see Table 1). Using PubMed, we searched for articles with both keywords of “clostridium difficile” and “appendicitis,” which yielded 25 results. We reviewed each individual article further to ensure that the case report was of appendicitis that was attributable to C. difficile. We reviewed a total of six cases of C. difficile appendicitis and found that none of the patients were immunocompromised. Interestingly, five out of the six cases of C. difficile appendicitis involved patients over 50 years-old. All six patients initially survived; however, one had a recurrent episode leading to septic shock and death. Three patients eventually underwent surgical intervention, two of which survived. Management was not specified in two of the cases. As described above, we, in conjunction with our surgical colleagues, opted for medical therapy alone given the patient’s significant clinical improvement. We should note, however, that given the limited number of reported cases, further studies on optimal treatment is still needed.

Table 1.

Literature review of cases of C. difficile appendicitis

Author (Year) Age (yo) Gender Immunocompromised Co-Morbidities Treatment Outcome
Garcia-Lechuz et al. (2001) 53 Male No Hypothyroidism

Imipenem

Appendectomy

Survived
Brown et al. (2007) 72 Male No COPD

Metronidazole

Appendectomy

Survived
Mattila et al. (2013) 97 Female Unknown

Breast cancer

Dementia

Unknown Survived
Mattila et al. (2013) 59 Female No Epilepsy Unknown Survived
Ridha et al. (2017) 30 Male No None

Metronidazole

Levofloxacin

Oral vancomycin

Survived
Coyne et al. (1997) 76 Female No ESRD on HD

1st episode: Metronidazole

2nd episode (4 weeks later): proctocolectomy

1st episode: Survived

2nd episode: death from septic shock

Conclusions

Acute appendicitis is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of CDI. While the exact pathogenesis remains unclear, its significance cannot be overlooked. Our case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for C. difficile in a patient presenting with both appendicitis and colitis, as prompt diagnosis and treatment are essential.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the patient for allowing us to share his case with the medical community.

Abbreviations

C. difficile

Clostridium difficile

WBC

White blood cell

CT

Computed tomography

BUN

Blood urea nitrogen

CDI

C. difficile Infection

Authors’ contributions

CP and DH both contributed to the data collection, literature review, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:825–834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mattila E, Arkkila P, Mattila PS, et al. ExtraintestinalClostridium difficile infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(6):e148–e153. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garcia-Lechuz JM, Hernangomez S, San Juan TP, et al. Extra-intestinal infections caused by Clostridium difficile. ClinMicrobiol Infect. 2001;7:453–457. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ridha A, Safiullah SM, Al-Abayechi S, Ur RehmanNadeem A. Acute appendicitis: an extracolonic manifestation of Clostridium difficilecolitis. Hindawi Case Rep Med. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/5083535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown TA, Rajappannair L, Dalton AB, et al. Acute appendicitis in the setting of Clostridium difficile colitis: case report and review of the literature. ClinGastroenterolHepatol. 2007;5:969–971. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coyne JD, Dervan PA, Haboubi NY. Involvement of the appendix in pseudomembranous colitis. J ClinPathol. 1997;50:70–71. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.1.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martirosian G, Bulanda M, Wojcik-Stojek B, et al. Acute appendicitis: the role of enterotoxigenic strains of Bacteroides fragilisand Clostridium difficile. Med SciMonit. 2001;7(3):382–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(7):e1–e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1539–1548. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1403772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Petroianu A, VillarBarroso TV. Pathophysiology of acute appendicitis. JSM GastroenterolHepatol. 2016;4(3):1062. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386:1278–1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Medical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES