Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jan 7;84(5):1254–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.058

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2—Advances in psoriatic disease management, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 treatments

Joel M Gelfand a,b,, April W Armstrong c, Stacie Bell d, George L Anesi b,e, Andrew Blauvelt f, Cassandra Calabrese g, Erica D Dommasch h, Steven R Feldman i, Dafna Gladman j,k, Leon Kircik l,m, Mark Lebwohl l, Vincent Lo Re III b,n, George Martin o, Joseph F Merola p, Jose U Scher q, Sergio Schwartzman r, James R Treat s, Abby S Van Voorhees t, Christoph T Ellebrecht a, Justine Fenner l, Anthony Ocon u, Maha N Syed a, Erica J Weinstein n, George Gondo d, Sue Heydon d, Samantha Koons d, Christopher T Ritchlin u
PMCID: PMC7788316  PMID: 33422626

Abstract

Objective

To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Study Design

The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted.

Results

The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus.

Limitations

The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity.

Conclusions

These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.

Key words: biologics, COVID-19, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, SARS-CoV-2, vaccines


Capsule Summary.

  • The National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force produced 27 guidance statements to promote optimal management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic.

  • Shared decision making, adherence to evidence-based treatment, and the urgent use of novel COVID-19 vaccination are recommended. The guidance statements will be updated in accordance with the rapidly evolving science of COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially worsened since the publication of Version 1 of the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) COVID-19 Task Force (TF) recommendations on September 4, 2020.1 In just the ensuing 15 weeks alone, there have been more than an additional 11,100,000 cases and 125,000 COVID-19 deaths in the United States and an additional nearly 50,000,000 cases and more than 800,000 deaths worldwide.2 Similar to the exponential growth of COVID-19 cases, basic biological and epidemiologic knowledge related to this pandemic have expanded dramatically. In just a few months since our initial recommendations, there have been major advances in the understanding of how to prevent and treat COVID-19 as well as a substantial increase in data to inform management decisions for patients with psoriatic disease during the pandemic. Therefore, this TF is providing updated scientifically based guidance to promote optimal management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic.

Methods

The methods have been described in detail previously.1 Briefly, the COVID-19 TF includes physicians, fellows, and senior NPF staff with a variety of expertise relevant to decision making in the pandemic. The TF reviews COVID-19 literature weekly in relation to psoriatic disease and meets every 2 to 4 weeks to address 5 core questions related to the pandemic. Existing recommendations were updated based on evolving science and were approved by unanimous consent. New recommendations were generated by using a modified Delphi process based on the RAND appropriateness method, including 2 rounds of voting with discussion in between.3 (Only 1 round was used for new recommendations that achieved high consensus on the first round.) Panel consensus was determined to be low when 5 or more votes fell into the 1-to-3 rating range with 5 or more votes concurrently falling into the 7-to-9 rating range. Consensus was interpreted as high if all 18 votes fell within a single tertile, with all other combinations considered as moderate levels of consensus. The results were analyzed by the NPF with an independent analysis of the data by a nonvoting member of the TF.

Results

The TF reaffirms the initial 22 guidance statements with updated data and has issued 5 new recommendations (Table I ). The median was within the category of agreement for all new statements, with the number of votes outside the range of agreement being only 2 for the 1 new statement for which agreement was not unanimous. All guidance statements were recommended, 13 with high consensus and the 14 with moderate consensus.

Table I.

NPF COVID-19 TF guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2

Guidance number Guidance statement Level of consensus
1.1 It is not known with certainty if having psoriatic disease meaningfully alters the risks of contracting SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 illness) or having a worse course of COVID-19 illness. Existing data, with some exceptions, generally suggest that patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis have similar rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 outcomes as the general population. Moderate
1.2 The likelihood of poor outcomes from COVID-19 is driven by risk factors such as older age and comorbidities such as chronic heart, lung, or kidney disease and metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity. Patients with psoriatic disease are more prone to these comorbidities, particularly in those with more severe disease. High
2.1 It is not known with certainty if treatments for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis meaningfully alter the risks of contracting SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 illness) or having a worse course of COVID-19 illness. Existing data generally suggest that treatments for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis do not meaningfully alter the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection or having worse COVID-19 outcomes. Moderate
2.2 It is recommended that patients who are not infected with SARS-CoV-2 continue their biologic or oral therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in most cases. Shared decision making between clinician and patient is recommended to guide discussions about use of systemic therapies during the pandemic. (See guidance 2.5 for definition of shared decision making.) High
2.3 Chronic systemic corticosteroids should be avoided if possible for the management of psoriatic arthritis. If patients require chronic systemic corticosteroids for the management of psoriatic arthritis, the dose should be tapered to the lowest dose necessary to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. Chronic systemic corticosteroid use for the treatment of psoriatic disease at the time of acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 may be associated with worse outcomes from COVID-19 illness. It is important to note, however, that corticosteroids may improve outcomes for COVID-19 when initiated in hospitalized patients requiring oxygen treatment. High
2.4 Individuals newly diagnosed with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis or who are currently not receiving treatment should be aware that untreated psoriatic disease is associated with serious impact on physical and emotional health and, in the case of psoriatic arthritis, can lead to permanent joint damage and disability. Shared decision making between clinician and patient is recommended to guide discussions about use of systemic therapies during the pandemic. (See guidance 2.5 for definition of shared decision making.) High
2.5 Providers recommend shared decision making with patients. Shared decision making between clinician and patient should be guided by several factors, including the potential benefits of treatment, the activity of skin and/or joint disease and response to previous therapies, as well as the patient's underlying risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes and ability to maintain measures to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 such as hand hygiene, wearing of masks, and physical distancing as required by pandemic conditions. A review of known benefits of treatment accompanied by acknowledgment of the uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and a discussion of a patient's individual circumstances and preferences should guide decision making. Moderate
3.1 Telemedicine should be offered to manage patients wherever possible when local restrictions or pandemic conditions limit the ability for in-person visits. The following patients can be managed with telemedicine: Patients who are clinically stable and previously started on psoriatic disease treatment. Patients requiring a follow-up visit and refills for medication. New patients without timely access to in-person visits. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who are experiencing a significant flare. If telemedicine visits become inadequate to monitor patients' disease progress or manage new or evolving symptoms or signs of skin and joint disease, clinicians and patients should consider in-person visits. Moderate
3.2 The following patients should be considered for in-person care if pandemic conditions allow (ie, the clinical practice is open to see patients in person) and standard operating procedures are observed (ie, social distancing, hand washing, and masking): Patients at risk for melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer should be seen in person at a frequency consistent with the standard of care for a full skin examination. New patients establishing care. Patients experiencing unstable psoriatic disease/flares. Patients requiring a thorough skin/or joint examination and a full physical examination for rheumatology patients. Moderate
3.3 Providers recommend the recent guidelines published by Lim et al35 on how to optimize safety of office phototherapy for the patients and staff in the setting of the pandemic. See Supplemental Table V for details. High
4.1 Patients should be advised to follow measures that prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2. These preventative measures include the following: to practice good hand hygiene, to maintain physical distancing from nonhousehold members, and to wear a face covering of the nose and mouth when indoors (except in their own home) and when outdoors but unable to maintain physical distancing. Face coverings should not be used in children under 2 years old due to risk of suffocation. See Supplemental Table VI for details. High
4.2 Patients with psoriatic disease should follow measures to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the workplace. If the workplace environment does not allow for the maintenance of prevention measures, a shared decision-making process between the patient and his/her clinician is recommended to determine if specific accommodations are medically necessary, especially for individuals who, due to age or underlying health conditions, are at especially high risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes. Moderate
4.3 Youth with psoriatic disease should follow measures to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 while at school. These measures include maintaining 6 feet of physical distancing, consistently wearing masks if over the age of 2 years, and washing hands frequently. If the school environment is unable to ensure these prevention measures or families believe their child may not be able to adhere to these practices, we encourage discussion with the patient, caregivers, and his/her clinician to collectively develop a learning plan in the best interest and safety of the child. High
4.4. Patients with psoriatic disease should receive the seasonal inactivated (eg, killed) influenza vaccine. While this vaccine will not protect against SARS-CoV-2, influenza vaccine lowers the risk of infection from seasonal influenza, which is of special importance to individual and public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients taking systemic medications for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis should discuss the timing of influenza vaccination with respect to their systemic psoriatic medications with their health care provider in order to optimize the response to the influenza vaccine. High
4.5 Patients with psoriatic disease who do not have contraindications to vaccination should receive an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it becomes available to them based on federal, state, and local guidance. Systemic medications for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis are not a contraindication to the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. If vaccine supply is limited, the TF recommends following the CDC's prioritization guidelines for early vaccination for selected groups based on their comorbidities and work setting (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations-process.html). High
4.6 It is recommended that patients who are to receive an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine continue their biologic or oral therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in most cases. Shared decision making between clinician and patient is recommended to guide discussions about use of systemic therapies during the pandemic. (See guidance 2.5 for definition of shared decision making.) High
4.7 For patients with psoriatic disease deciding whether or not to participate in a COVID-19 therapeutic or vaccine clinical trial, the TF recommends that the decision should be made on a case-by-case basis with shared decision making among the patient, researcher, and provider. High
5.1 Patients with psoriatic disease who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 should monitor their symptoms and discuss the management of their treatments with their health care providers. Moderate
5.2 Patients with psoriatic disease who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 should be prescribed and adhere to evidence-based COVID-19 therapies. Evidence-based therapies∗ currently include supportive care for all patients and the following:
For outpatients:
  • Bamlanivimab for patients meeting specific criteria and who are at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization

  • Casirivimab and imdevimab to be administered together for patients meeting specific criteria and who are at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization

Moderate
For hospitalized patients:
  • Dexamethasone (systemic steroids) for patients meeting specific criteria

  • Remdesivir treatment for patients meeting specific criteria

  • Baricitinib, in combination with remdesivir, for patients meeting specific criteria

The care of the hospitalized patient should include consultation with rheumatologists, dermatologists, and/or infectious disease specialists as medically necessary.
∗Evidence-based therapies are those that have been tested in well-conducted randomized controlled clinical trials and have proven benefit on clinically relevant COVID-19 outcomes.
5.3 Systemic corticosteroids for the management of COVID-19 in patients with psoriatic disease are not contraindicated and should not be withheld due to the concern of potentially flaring psoriasis upon withdrawal of corticosteroids when evidence demonstrates the effectiveness for treating COVID-19 illness. Moderate
5.4.1 Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine are not recommended for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in patients with psoriatic disease outside of a clinical trial. Cases of psoriasis flare have been reported in patients on antimalarial medications, but the clinical significance is not well understood. High
5.4.2 At this time, due to insufficient data to recommend for or against the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with psoriatic disease, the TF recommends convalescent plasma to primarily be used in the setting of a clinical trial. Outside of a clinical trial, its use may be considered on a case-by-case basis with shared decision making between the patient and provider. Moderate
5.4.3 Ivermectin is not recommended for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in patients with psoriatic disease outside of a clinical trial. High
5.5 Resumption of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis treatments held during SARS-CoV-2 infection should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Most patients can restart psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis treatments after complete resolution of COVID-19 symptoms. In those who have had a severe hospital course, shared decision making made on a case-by-case basis is recommended. Moderate
5.6 Patients with psoriatic disease should be aware that infection with SARS-CoV-2 may result in a flare of psoriasis based on case reports. The clinical significance of the risk of COVID-19 flaring psoriasis is not known. Moderate
5.7 Patients with psoriatic disease who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 should follow CDC guidance on home isolation and discuss with their health care providers when they can end home isolation. We recommend waiting a minimum of 10 days after COVID-19 symptom onset, along with fever resolution for 24 hours without antipyretics and improvement in other symptoms, before ending home isolation and returning to work, as patients are unlikely to be infectious after this point. In patients with severe cases of COVID-19 or when psoriasis patients are on medications with immunosuppressive effects, we recommend a case-by-case approach to determining the length of home isolation. Moderate
5.8 Patients with close contact to someone with SARS-CoV-2 infection should quarantine themselves for 14 days after the last contact and discuss the management of their psoriatic disease treatment with their medical provider(s). Moderate

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; mRNA, messenger RNA; NPF, National Psoriasis Foundation; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; TF, Task Force.

Category 1: What are the effects of psoriatic disease itself on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and COVID-19 illness?

Patients with psoriasis are more prone to thrombosis and comorbidities that portend worse COVID-19 outcomes and may be more susceptible to infection, which raised concerns that they could be at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and worse COVID-19 outcomes.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Nevertheless, patients with psoriatic disease appear to have similar rates of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 outcomes as the general population, with multiple new studies from Italy, which primarily focused on patients with psoriasis receiving oral or biologic treatment, supporting our initial recommendation (guidance 1.1).9, 10, 11 Additional new studies of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) nested within cohorts of patients with rheumatic disease also suggest that they have similar rates of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 outcomes as the general population.12, 13, 14 However, the risk of COVID-19 in autoimmune diseases was higher than in control patients (odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-4.58) in a meta-analysis of 7 case-control studies.15

The severity of COVID-19 continues to be primarily driven by risk factors such as current smoking, male sex, older age, and underlying comorbidities (guidance 1.2).16, 17, 18, 19 New data confirm that age, male sex, and pre-existing comorbidities are also important drivers of poor COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis.20

Category 2: What are the effects of psoriasis or PsA treatment on SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 illness?

The evolving literature reaffirms the TF conclusion that treatments for psoriasis and/or PsA do not appear to meaningfully alter the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection or having worse COVID-19 outcomes; therefore, patients who are not infected with SARS-CoV-2 should continue their biologic or oral therapies for psoriasis and/or PsA in most cases (guidance 2.1 and 2.2). COVID-19 hospitalization was more frequent in patients using nonbiologic systemic therapy than in those using biologics (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.2) in a registry of 374 patients with psoriasis from 25 countries.20 A cohort of 6501 patients with psoriasis on biologics at northern Italian centers showed that the standardized incidence ratio of hospitalization and death in patients with psoriasis compared with those in the general population was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.57-1.45) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.07-1.38), respectively.11 In a study of 12,807 patients with psoriasis on biologics from 33 Italian dermatology centers, 26 (0.25%) had confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection (similar to general population in Italy [0.31%]).21 In a study of patients with psoriasis (100 on topical treatment, 80 on biologics) from a single Italian dermatology center, COVID-19 symptoms were more common, but not statistically significant, in the biologic group (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.58-2.58).22 A cohort of 2329 patients with psoriasis on systemic therapy in Spain yielded standardized incidence ratios of 1.58 (95% CI, 0.98-2.41), 1.55 (95% CI, 0.67-3.06), and 1.38 (95% CI, 0.03-7.66) for COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, respectively.23 Finally, a study of a global electronic medical record database that includes information on approximately 53 million people identified no evidence for increased COVID-19 hospitalization for patients prescribed tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) (relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.47-1.14), methotrexate (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.23), or the combination of TNFi/methotrexate (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68-1.22) within 1 year of developing COVID-19.24

Similarly, the use of immunosuppressive/immunomodulating therapy was not associated with an increased risk for COVID-19 in a cohort of 5302 patients with inflammatory bowel disease.25 This finding was supported by the Surveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion (SECURE-IBD) registry, which showed no increase in severe outcomes in patients on TNFi or anti–interleukin (IL) 12/23 monotherapy.26 Patients with rheumatic disease do not appear to be at higher risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection or of developing severe COVID-19 when on anti-TNF therapy.15 , 27 , 28

Nevertheless, uncertainty remains based on the quality of the existing data and lack of detailed analysis of patients at high risk because of age and/or comorbidity; therefore, shared decision making between the clinician and patient is recommended (guidance 2.2, 2.4, and 2.5). Chronic systemic corticosteroids should be avoided, if possible, for the management of PsA, because additional research confirms that their use is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes (guidance 2.3).15 , 29

Category 3: How should medical care be delivered to patients with psoriatic disease to lower their risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 while still ensuring quality of care?

Telemedicine remains a critical option for treating patients with psoriatic disease during the pandemic for appropriate patients (guidance 3.1 and 3.2). The evolving literature suggests that a short interruption of in-person patient-rheumatologist interactions had no major detrimental impact on the disease course of PsA as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.30 Nevertheless, reductions in in-person care during the pandemic may be associated with a delay in diagnosis and treatment of malignancies, including melanoma.31 , 32

Universal masking for staff, clinicians, and patients; restrictions on visitation; and liberal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients are very effective in limiting SARS-CoV-2 spread, with nosocomial transmission exceptionally rare.33 , 34 Therefore, patients should be informed that in-person medical care, including phototherapy (guidance 3.3), can be delivered safely with minimal risk of COVID-19 transmission in the clinical setting when safeguards are maintained.35 , 36 Outbreaks in the clinical setting that have occurred have been due to lack of masking in patient care areas and a lack of distancing among staff while eating unmasked.33 Thus, the TF updated guidance 3.2, emphasizing that standard operating procedures for social distancing, hand washing, and masking be observed in clinical settings.

Category 4: What should patients with psoriatic disease do to protect themselves from becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2?

Patients should follow recommended measures to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 (guidance 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3).37 In cases where measures to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at work or school cannot be maintained, shared decision making is recommended to determine if specific accommodations are medically necessary (guidance 4.2 and 4.3). In the United States, adherence rates with methods to prevent COVID-19 were lowest among adults aged 18 to 29 years (73%) and highest among those aged older than 60 years (86%).38 An international survey of patients with psoriasis found that rates of COVID-19 prevention measures were slightly higher in those receiving biologics for psoriasis than in those receiving nonbiologic systemic therapies.20

Since our first recommendations, the major advance in protection from COVID-19 is the advent of highly effective vaccines using messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, which results in temporary expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in human cells after injection, triggering an immune response (Table II ). The regimen of 2 doses, 21 days apart, for BNT162b2 (manufactured by Pfizer and BioNTech) conferred 95% protection against COVID-19, with an excellent safety profile similar to that of other viral vaccines, and was granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on December 11, 2020, by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).39 , 40 Similarly, the regimen of 2 doses, 28 days apart, for mRNA-1273 (manufactured by Moderna) conferred 94.5% protection against COVID-19 (FDA EUA pending).41 Therefore, the TF recommends that patients with psoriatic disease who do not have contraindications to vaccination should receive an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it becomes available to them (guidance 4.5). Additional vaccine platforms are undergoing testing (Table II).42

Table II.

Vaccine candidates for COVID-19 and available data on vaccination schedule, efficacy, and safety

Vaccine candidate Vaccination schedule Approximate number of individuals in phase 3 Efficacy Safety Status
Pfizer/BioNTech
BNT162b2 (mRNA)39,40
IM injection on days 0 and 21 44,000 95% efficacy in preventing COVID-19 (162 cases in placebo group, 8 in BNT162b2 group)
Severe COVID-19: 9 cases in placebo group, 1 in BNT162b2 group
  • Most common solicited adverse reactions: injection site reactions (84.1%), fatigue (62.9%), headache (55.1%), muscle pain (38.3%), chills (31.9%), joint pain (23.6%), and fever (14.2%)

  • Severe adverse reactions occurred in 0.0% to 4.6% of participants, were more frequent after dose 2 than after dose 1, and were generally less frequent in participants ≥55 years.

  • The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively).

  • Four cases of Bell palsy in the vaccine group compared with no cases in the placebo group, consistent with the expected rate

FDA EUA granted December 11, 2020
Safety monitoring will continue for 2 years after administration of the second dose of the vaccine.
Moderna mRNA-1273 (mRNA)41 IM injection on days 0 and 28 30,400 94.5% efficacy in preventing COVID-19 (90 cases in placebo group, 5 in mRNA-1273 group)
Severe COVID-19: 11 cases in placebo group, 0 in mRNA-1273 group
  • Most common solicited adverse reactions: injection site pain (91.6%), fatigue (68.5%), headache (63.0%), muscle pain (59.6%), joint pain (44.8%), and chills (43.4%).

  • Severe adverse reactions occurred in 0.2% to 9.7% of participants, were more frequent after dose 2 than after dose 1, and were generally less frequent in participants ≥65 years.

  • Unsolicited adverse events possibly related to vaccine:

  • Local lymphadenopathy: 1.1% in the vaccine group and 0.63% in the placebo group

  • Hypersensitivity: 1.5% in the vaccine group vs 1.1% placebo group

  • Frequency of serious adverse events was similar in vaccine and placebo groups (1.0% for both).

  • Four cases of Bell palsy in the vaccine group compared with 1 case in the placebo group

FDA EUA pending
Safety evaluation until day 759 after administration of second dose
AstraZeneca/Oxford
AZD1222 (replication-deficient chimpanzee adenoviral vector
ChAdOx1, containing the SARS-CoV-2 structural surface glycoprotein antigen)42
2-dose regimen, interval to be determined 40,000
Interim data reported on 11,600
62.1% (2 standard doses); 90% (low dose followed by standard dose); overall, 70.4%
Severe COVID-19: 10 cases in placebo group, 0 in AZD1222 group
  • Serious adverse events: 79 in treatment and 89 in control group

  • Adverse events: vaccine (n = 12,021) vs control (n = 11,724)

  • Anaphylactic reaction: 1 (vaccine) vs 0 (control)

Recruiting
Johnson & Johnson
JNJ-78436735 (nonreplicating viral vector)
1 dose IM injection; 5 × 1010 viral particles (Ad26.COV2.S) Up to 60,000 planned (30,000 per group) TBD TBD Recruiting
Novavax
NVX-CoV2373 (nanoparticle vaccine)
2 doses of 5 μg SARS-CoV-2 rS + 50 μg Matrix-M1 adjuvant (coformulated), 1 dose each on days 0 and 21 Up to 30,000 TBD TBD Recruiting
Inovio Pharmaceuticals
INO-4800(DNA vaccine plasmid)
Participants will receive either 1 or 2 1.0-mg ID injections of INO-4800 based on results from phase 2 segment, followed by EP using the CELLECTRA 2000 device on day 0 and day 28 6578 participants TBD TBD Recruiting
Medicago; GlaxoSmithKline; Dynavax
VIR-7831 (plant-based adjuvant vaccine)
VIR-7831 given by intravenous infusion 1360 participants TBD TBD Recruiting

EP, Electroporation; EUA, Emergency Use Authorization; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; ID, intradermal; IM, intramuscular; mRNA, messenger RNA; rS, recombinant spike; TBD, to be determined.

The effect of psoriasis treatment on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines is unknown. Based on a review of the literature, methotrexate treatment with doses commonly used in patients with psoriatic disease lowers the humoral response to seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, and temporary discontinuation of methotrexate for 2 weeks after influenza immunization improves the immunogenicity of the seasonal influenza vaccine.43 , 44 TNFi and tofacitinib do not significantly affect the humoral immune response to influenza vaccination but have been reported to result in both reduced and sufficient immune responses to the pneumococcal vaccine.44, 45, 46, 47, 48 Abatacept,49 ustekinumab,50 and anti–IL-17 treatment51, 52, 53 do not interfere with the immune response to either influenza or pneumococcal vaccination, although large prospective studies of vaccine efficacy are lacking. No data were available at the time of analysis for cyclosporine (as used for psoriasis and other inflammatory diseases), anti–IL-23 biologics, apremilast, or acitretin on the efficacy of any approved vaccine.

Extrapolating from this literature and based on current available evidence, the TF recommends that patients who are to receive an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine continue their biologic or oral therapies for psoriasis and/or PsA during the vaccination period (guidance 4.6). Many trials of COVID-19 treatment and vaccines have excluded patients with immune-mediated diseases or patients taking immune-modulating therapy. The TF encourages the inclusion of patients with psoriatic disease, including those on systemic treatments, in future studies of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments and recommends that patients participate in such experiments based on shared decision making among the patient, researcher, and provider (guidance 4.7).

Category 5: What should patients with psoriatic disease do if they become infected with SARS-CoV-2?

Major advances have occurred in the management of SARS-CoV-2 since Version 1 of the TF recommendations. For outpatients meeting specific criteria and at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19, the use of monoclonal antibodies specifically directed against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 are recommended (guidance 5.2).54, 55, 56, 57, 58 For hospitalized patients meeting specific criteria, in addition to remdesivir and dexamethasone, baricitinib in combination with remdesivir is an option as because reduces recovery time and new infections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 compared to remdesivir alone.59 However, baricitinib had no mortality benefit, can be prothrombotic, and is recommended only when corticosteroids cannot be used.59 , 60 Furthermore, the remdesivir efficacy is modest, and international trials did not find mortality benefit.61 , 62

Additional evidence suggests that hydroxychloroquine is not effective for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19; therefore, the TF emphasizes that its use be restricted to clinical trials (guidance 5.4.1).63, 64, 65, 66, 67 The evidence that convalescent plasma is effective for COVID-19 is limited despite the FDA EUA; therefore, the TF recommends that it be used primarily in clinical trials (guidance 5.4.2).68 , 69 Ivermectin has in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2; however, doses up to 100 times higher than those approved for use in humans would be required to achieve antiviral effects against COVID-19, raising safety concerns even if therapeutic levels could feasibly be achieved.70, 71, 72, 73 Therefore, the TF recommends ivermectin be used only in the setting of a clinical trial (guidance 5.4.3).

Based on limited available data and to be consistent with prescribing information, it may be prudent to hold treatments that target the immune system in the setting of suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, but the ultimate decision should be made case by case. Patients with psoriatic disease should be aware that infection with SARS-CoV-2 may result in a flare of psoriasis, including pustular flares (guidance 5.6).74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81

Patients with psoriatic disease who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 should follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance on home isolation and discuss with their health care providers when they can end home isolation (guidance 5.7; Version 1, Supplemental Table IX available via Mendeley at https://doi.org/10.17632/w5m8jf94m8.2).1 , 82, 83, 84 In the event that someone with psoriatic disease has close contact (Version 1, Supplemental Table X) with an individual with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, he or she should follow local public health authority guidance for the recommended duration of quarantine.1 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a quarantine period of 14 days after last contact with a person who has COVID-19, assuming one remains asymptomatic, but offers an option to shorten quarantine to end after day 10 from last contact or day 7 with appropriately timed diagnostic testing (guidance 5.8).85 Individuals who have had COVID-19 within the past 3 months do not need to quarantine after close contact with someone who is infected, as long as they do not develop symptoms again.86 The decision regarding continuing or holding psoriasis treatments during a period of quarantine should be individualized on a case-by-case basis between patient and provider.

Resumption of psoriasis and/or PsA treatments held during SARS-CoV-2 infection should be decided on a case-by-case basis (guidance 5.5). The persistence of 1 or more symptoms of COVID-19, such as fatigue or joint pain, beyond the acute phase of the illness can occur87 and may complicate the decision to restart psoriasis or PsA medications. Therefore, shared decision making between the patient and provider(s) is recommended (guidance 2.5).

Discussion

The NPF COVID-19 TF guidance statements serve to promote optimal management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic. Several limitations are acknowledged. First, the TF did not formally grade the strength of our recommendations.88 With the exception of guidance statements 4.4, 4.5, 5.2, 5.4.1, and 5.4.2, which are based on large-scale randomized controlled trials, the evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality or quantity. Large-scale, longer-term, population-based studies of patients with psoriatic disease (particularly those with increased COVID-19 risk due to age and/or comorbidity), with appropriate comparator groups, adjustment for relevant confounding variables, and complete ascertainment of clinically important COVID-19 outcomes are urgently needed.89 Second, the guidance is intended to be neither proscriptive nor comprehensive. The ultimate judgment regarding how these recommendations should be followed is best left with the treating clinician and the patient in light of the circumstances presented by the individual patient and the variability and biological behavior of the disease and therapeutics.

The recommendations are a living document that will be updated and amended when necessary by the rapidly evolving science of COVID-19. Readers are encouraged to visit https://www.psoriasis.org/covid-19-resource-center regularly for the latest guidance from the TF to promote optimal care and outcomes for patients with psoriatic disease during the pandemic.

Conflicts of interest

Dr Gelfand has served as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biologics, Novartis Corp, Regeneron, UCB (Data Safety and Monitoring Board), Sanofi, and Pfizer, receiving honoraria; has received research grants (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis Corp, Sanofi, Celgene, OrthoDermatologics, and Pfizer; has received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly by Eli Lilly and Company and Ortho Dermatologics; is a copatent holder of resiquimod for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; and is a deputy editor for the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, receiving honoraria from the Society for Investigative Dermatology. Dr Armstrong has served as a research investigator and/or scientific advisor to Leo, AbbVie, UCB, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Sun, Dermavant, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Regeneron, Dermira, and Modmed. Dr Bell is an employee of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Anesi is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS026372) and has received fees from UpToDate for authoring COVID-19 clinical reference material. Dr Blauvelt has served as a scientific advisor and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma. Dr Calabrese is a speaker for Sanofi-Regeneron and consultant for AbbVie. Dr Feldman has received research, speaking, and/or consulting support from Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, Almirall, Alvotech, Leo Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mylan, Celgene, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatology, AbbVie, Samsung, Janssen, Lilly, Menlo, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Novan, Qurient, National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Advance Medical, Sun Pharma, Suncare Research, Informa, UpToDate, and National Psoriasis Foundation; has consulted for others through Guidepoint Global, Gerson Lehrman, and other consulting organizations; is the founder and majority owner of www.DrScore.com; and is a founder and part owner of Causa Research, a company dedicated to enhancing patients' adherence to treatment. Dr Gladman is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Kircik has served either as an investigator, consultant, or speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Bausch Health Canada, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cellceutix, Celgene, Coherus, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Leo, MC2, Maruho, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Sun Pharma, UCB, Taro, and Xenoport. Dr Lebwohl is an employee of Mount Sinai; receives research funds from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen Research and Development, Leo Pharmaceuticals, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and UCB; and is a consultant for Aditum Bio, Allergan, Almirall, Arcutis, Avotres Therapeutics, BirchBioMed, BMD Skincare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cara Therapeutics, Castle Biosciences, Corrona, Dermavant Sciences, Evelo, Facilitate International Dermatologic Education, Foundation for Research and Education in Dermatology, Inozyme Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Menlo, Mitsubishi, Neuroderm, Pfizer, Promius/Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Serono, Theravance, and Verrica. Dr Martin is a consultant for Almirall, Athenex, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, LEO, Ortho Dermatologic, Pfizer, and UCB and a scientific advisor for Almirall, Athenex, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO, Ortho Dermatologic, Pfizer, and UCB. Dr Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sun Pharma, Pfizer, and EMD Serono. Dr Scher is a consultant for UCB, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi and is supported in part by the Riley Family Foundation and the Beatrice Snyder Foundation. Dr Schwartzman is a speaker for AbbVie, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; owns stock in Amgen, Boston Scientific, Gilead, Medtronic, and Pfizer; is a consultant for AbbVie, Myriad, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB; is a scientific advisory board member for Myriad; and is a board member of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Van Voorhees has been an investigator for Celgene, Lilly, and AbbVie and an advisor/consultant for AbbVie, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Dermira, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Valeant. Dr Syed is supported by a grant from Pfizer. Authors Gondo, Heydon, and Koons are employees of the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Ritchlin reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, and Boehringer Ingelheim, as well as grants from Amgen, UCB, and AbbVie outside the submitted work. Drs Dommasch, Lo Re, Treat, Ellebrecht, Fenner, Ocon, and Weinstein have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

IRB approval status: Not applicable.

Reprints not available from the authors.

References

  • 1.Gelfand J.M., Armstrong A.W., Bell S., et al. National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: version 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1704–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center COVID-19 map. Accessed December 18, 2020. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu
  • 3.Fitch K., Bernstein S.J., Aguilar M.D., Burnand B., LaCalle J.R. Rand Corp; 2001. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yeung H., Takeshita J., Mehta N.N., et al. Psoriasis severity and the prevalence of major medical comorbidity: a population-based study. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:1173–1179. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Takeshita J., Shin D.B., Ogdie A., Gelfand J.M. Risk of serious infection, opportunistic infection, and herpes zoster among patients with psoriasis in the United Kingdom. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:1726–1735. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.01.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gelfand J.M., Dommasch E.D., Shin D.B., et al. The risk of stroke in patients with psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:2411–2418. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ogdie A., Kay McGill N., Shin D.B., et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis: a general population-based cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3608–3614. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garshick M.S., Tawil M., Barrett T.J., et al. Activated platelets induce endothelial cell inflammatory response in psoriasis via COX-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:1340–1351. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.314008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gisondi P., Bellinato F., Chiricozzi A., Girolomoni G. The risk of COVID-19 pandemic in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis receiving systemic treatments. Vaccines (Basel) 2020;8:728. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Talamonti M., Galluzzo M., Chiricozzi A., et al. Characteristic of chronic plaque psoriasis patients treated with biologics in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk analysis from the PSO-BIO-COVID Observational Study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1080/14712593.2021.1853698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gisondi P., Piaserico S., Naldi L., et al. Incidence rates of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis receiving biological treatment: Northern Italy experience. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Costantino F., Bahier L., Tarancón L.C., et al. COVID-19 in French patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: clinical features, risk factors and treatment adherence. Joint Bone Spine. 2020;88:105095. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.105095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Montero F., Martínez-Barrio J., Serrano-Benavente B., et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions: clinical characteristics of poor outcomes. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:1593–1598. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04676-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nuño L., Novella Navarro M., Bonilla G., et al. Clinical course, severity and mortality in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:1659–1661. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akiyama S., Hamdeh S., Micic D., Sakuraba A. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:384–391. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peckham H., de Gruijter N.M., Raine C., et al. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou Y., Yang Q., Chi J., et al. Comorbidities and the risk of severe or fatal outcomes associated with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;99:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKeigue P.M., Weir A., Bishop J., et al. Rapid epidemiological analysis of comorbidities and treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alqahtani J.S., Oyelade T., Aldhahir A.M., et al. Prevalence, severity and mortality associated with COPD and smoking in patients with COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0233147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahil S.K., Dand N., Mason K.J., et al. Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis—insights from a global registry–based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Talamonti M., Galluzzo M., Chiricozzi A., et al. Characteristic of chronic plaque psoriasis patients treated with biologics in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk analysis from the PSO-BIO-COVID Observational Study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1853698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brazzelli V., Isoletta E., Barak O., et al. Does therapy with biological drugs influence COVID-19 infection? Observational monocentric prevalence study on the clinical and epidemiological data of psoriatic patients treated with biological drugs or with topical drugs alone. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e14516. doi: 10.1111/dth.14516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baniandrés-Rodríguez O., Vilar-Alejo J., Rivera R., et al. Incidence of severe COVID-19 outcomes in psoriatic patients treated with systemic therapies during the pandemic: a Biobadaderm cohort analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:513–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yousaf A., Gayam S., Feldman S., Zinn Z., Kolodney M. Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in patients taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or methotrexate: a multicenter research network study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burke K.E., Kochar B., Allegretti J.R., et al. Immunosuppressive therapy and risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27:155–161. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ungaro R.C., Brenner E.J., Gearry R.B., et al. Effect of IBD medications on COVID-19 outcomes: results from an international registry. Gut. 2020 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Veenstra J., Buechler C.R., Robinson G., et al. Antecedent immunosuppressive therapy for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in the setting of a COVID-19 outbreak. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1696–1703. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Michelena X., Borrell H., López-Corbeto M., et al. Incidence of COVID-19 in a cohort of adult and paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases treated with targeted biologic and synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:564–570. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cano E.J., Fuentes X.F., Campioli C.C., et al. Impact of corticosteroids in coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ciurea A., Papagiannoulis E., Bürki K., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the disease course of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:238–241. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Patt D., Gordan L., Diaz M., et al. Impact of COVID-19 on cancer care: how the pandemic is delaying cancer diagnosis and treatment for American seniors. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020;4:1059–1071. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ricci F., Fania L., Paradisi A., et al. Delayed melanoma diagnosis in the COVID-19 era: increased Breslow thickness in primary melanomas seen after the COVID-19 lockdown. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e778–e779. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Richterman A., Meyerowitz E.A., Cevik M. Hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection: lessons for public health. JAMA. 2020;324:2155–2156. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rhee C., Baker M., Vaidya V., et al. Incidence of nosocomial COVID-19 in patients hospitalized at a large US academic medical center. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2020498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lim H.W., Feldman S.R., Van Voorhees A.S., Gelfand J.M. Recommendations for phototherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:287–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gelfand J.M., Hefele B.E. Clinical research after COVID-19: embracing a new normal. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:481–483. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention How to protect yourself & others; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html
  • 38.Hutchins H.J., Wolff B., Leeb R., et al. COVID-19 mitigation behaviors by age group—United States, April–June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1584–1590. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.US Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www-fda-gov/media/144412/download
  • 40.Polack F.P., Thomas S.J., Kitchin N., et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med Med. 2020;383:2603–2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.US Food and Drug Administration FDA briefing document. Moderna COVID-19 vaccine; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www-fda-gov/media/144434/download
  • 42.Voysey M., Clemens S.A.C., Madhi S.A., et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet. 2021;397:99–111. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32661-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Park J.K., Lee Y.J., Shin K., et al. Impact of temporary methotrexate discontinuation for 2 weeks on immunogenicity of seasonal influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:898–904. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Subesinghe S., Bechman K., Rutherford A.I., Goldblatt D., Galloway J.B. A systematic review and metaanalysis of antirheumatic drugs and vaccine immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:733–744. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fiorino G., Peyrin-Biroulet L., Naccarato P., et al. Effects of immunosuppression on immune response to pneumococcal vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1042–1047. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kaine J.L., Kivitz A.J., Birbara C., Luo A.Y. Immune responses following administration of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines to patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving adalimumab. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:272–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Winthrop K.L., Korman N., Abramovits W., et al. T-cell-mediated immune response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) and tetanus toxoid vaccine in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis during tofacitinib treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:1149–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Winthrop K.L., Silverfield J., Racewicz A., et al. The effect of tofacitinib on pneumococcal and influenza vaccine responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:687–695. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Alten R., Bingham C.O., 3rd, Cohen S.B., et al. Antibody response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1082-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Doornekamp L., Goetgebuer R.L., Schmitz K.S., et al. High immunogenicity to influenza vaccination in Crohn’s disease patients treated with ustekinumab. Vaccines (Basel) 2020;8:455. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Furer V., Zisman D., Kaufman I., et al. Immunogenicity and safety of vaccination against seasonal influenza vaccine in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with secukinumab. Vaccine. 2020;38:847–851. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Richi P., Martín M.D., de Ory F., et al. Secukinumab does not impair the immunogenic response to the influenza vaccine in patients. RMD Open. 2019;5:e001018. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gomez E.V., Bishop J.L., Jackson K., Muram T.M., Phillips D. Response to tetanus and pneumococcal vaccination following administration of ixekizumab in healthy participants. BioDrugs. 2017;31:545–554. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0249-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.An EUA for bamlanivimab-A monoclonal antibody for COVID-19. JAMA. Published online December 11, 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Huang Y., Yang C., Xu X.-F., Xu W., Liu S.-W. Structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID-19. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41:1141–1149. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0485-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vangelista L., Secchi M. Prepare for the future: dissecting the spike to seek broadly neutralizing antibodies and universal vaccine for pandemic coronaviruses. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:226. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Regeneron Statement on REGN-COV2 Emergency Use Authorization request; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://investor.regeneron.com/static-files/6feab76b-176d-402d-bf30-d40462e68b7b#:∼:text=Statement%20on%20REGN%2DCOV2%20Emergency%20Use%20Authorization%20Request&text=Under%20our%20agreement%20with%20the,be%20responsible%20for%20their%20distribution
  • 58.Weinreich D.M., Sivapalasingam S., Norton T., et al. REGN-COV2, a neutralizing antibody cocktail, in outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:238–251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kalil A.C., Patterson T.F., Mehta A.K., et al. Baricitinib plus remdesivir for hospitalized adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.National Institutes of Health The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel’s statement on the Emergency Use Authorization of baricitinib for the treatment of COVID-19; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/covid19treatmentguidelines.pdf
  • 61.Beigel J.H., Tomashek K.M., Dodd L.E., et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19—final report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1813–1826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dyer O. Covid-19: remdesivir has little or no impact on survival, WHO trial shows. BMJ. 2020;371:m4057. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Barnabas R.V., Brown E.R., Bershteyn A., et al. Hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Ann Intern Med. Published online December 8, 2020 doi: 10.7326/M20-6519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mitjà O., Corbacho-Monné M., Ubals M., et al. A cluster-randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine for prevention of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:417–427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Effect of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2030–2040. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cavalcanti A.B., Zampieri F.G., Rosa R.G., et al. Hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in mild-to-moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2041–2052. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Skipper C.P., Pastick K.A., Engen N.W., et al. Hydroxychloroquine in nonhospitalized adults with early COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:623–631. doi: 10.7326/M20-4207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Agarwal A., Mukherjee A., Kumar G., Chatterjee P., Bhatnagar T., Malhotra P. Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate covid-19 in adults in India: open label phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial) BMJ. 2020;371:m3939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Simonovich V.A., Burgos Pratx L.D., Scibona P., et al. A randomized trial of convalescent plasma in Covid-19 severe pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:619–629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2031304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Caly L., Druce J.D., Catton M.G., Jans D.A., Wagstaff K.M. The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antivir Res. 2020;178:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Molento M.B. COVID-19 and the rush for self-medication and self-dosing with ivermectin: a word of caution. One Health. 2020;10:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.US Food and Drug Administration FAQ: COVID-19 and ivermectin intended for animals; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www-fda-gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/faq-covid-19-and-ivermectin-intended-animals
  • 73.Barkwell R., Shields S. Deaths associated with ivermectin treatment of scabies. Lancet. 1997;349:1144–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ghalamkarpour F., Pourani M.R., Abdollahimajd F., Zargari O. A case of severe psoriatic erythroderma with COVID-19. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020:1–3. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1799918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kutlu Ö., Metin A. A case of exacerbation of psoriasis after oseltamivir and hydroxychloroquine in a patient with COVID-19: will cases of psoriasis increase after COVID-19 pandemic? Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:13383. doi: 10.1111/dth.13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ozaras R., Berk A., Ucar D.H., Duman H., Kaya F., Mutlu H. Covid-19 and exacerbation of psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13632. doi: 10.1111/dth.13632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gananandan K., Sacks B., Ewing I. Guttate psoriasis secondary to COVID-19. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:e237367. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sachdeva M., Mufti A., Maliyar K., Lytvyn Y., Yeung J. Hydroxychloroquine effects on psoriasis: a systematic review and a cautionary note for COVID-19 treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shakoei S., Ghanadan A., Hamzelou S. Pustular psoriasis exacerbated by COVID-19 in a patient with the history of psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e14462. doi: 10.1111/dth.14462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shahidi Dadras M., Diab R., Ahadi M., Abdollahimajd F. Generalized pustular psoriasis following COVID-19. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34:e14595. doi: 10.1111/dth.14595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mathieu R.J., Cobb C.B.C., Telang G.H., Firoz E.F. New-onset pustular psoriasis in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection causing coronavirus disease 2019. JAAD Case Rep. 2020;6:1360–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Discontinuation of isolation for persons with COVID-19 not in healthcare settings; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html#:∼:text=For%20most%20persons%20with%20COVID,with%20improvement%20of%20other%20symptoms
  • 83.van Kampen JJA, van de Vijver D.A.M.C., Fraaij P.L.A., et al. Shedding of infectious virus in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): duration and key determinants. Preprint. medRxiv. 2020:2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.08.2012531006.08.20125310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Brooks J.T., Butler J.C., Redfield R.R. Universal masking to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission—the time is now. JAMA. 2020;324:635–637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Options to reduce quarantine for contacts of persons with sars-cov-2 infection using symptom monitoring and diagnostic testing; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/more/scientific-brief-options-to-reduce-quarantine.html [PubMed]
  • 86.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention When to quarantine; 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/quarantine.html
  • 87.Carfì A., Bernabei R., Landi F. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324:603–605. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Guyatt G., Oxman A.D., Akl E.A., et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shin D.B., Syed M.N., Gelfand J.M. Commentary. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES