Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2020 Dec 23;16(12):e1009259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009259

Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration

Passley Hargrove-Grimes 1,2, Anupam K Mondal 1,#, Jessica Gumerson 1,#, Jacob Nellissery 1, Angel M Aponte 3, Linn Gieser 1, Haohua Qian 4, Robert N Fariss 5, Juan S Bonifacino 6, Tiansen Li 1, Anand Swaroop 1,*
Editor: Uwe Wolfrum7
PMCID: PMC7790415  PMID: 33362196

Abstract

Rab-GTPases and associated effectors mediate cargo transport through the endomembrane system of eukaryotic cells, regulating key processes such as membrane turnover, signal transduction, protein recycling and degradation. Using developmental transcriptome data, we identified Rabgef1 (encoding the protein RabGEF1 or Rabex-5) as the only gene associated with Rab GTPases that exhibited strong concordance with retinal photoreceptor differentiation. Loss of Rabgef1 in mice (Rabgef1-/-) resulted in defects specifically of photoreceptor morphology and almost complete loss of both rod and cone function as early as eye opening; however, aberrant outer segment formation could only partly account for visual function deficits. RabGEF1 protein in retinal photoreceptors interacts with Rabaptin-5, and RabGEF1 absence leads to reduction of early endosomes consistent with studies in other mammalian cells and tissues. Electron microscopy analyses reveal abnormal accumulation of macromolecular aggregates in autophagosome-like vacuoles and enhanced immunostaining for LC3A/B and p62 in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors, consistent with compromised autophagy. Transcriptome analysis of the developing Rabgef1-/- retina reveals altered expression of 2469 genes related to multiple pathways including phototransduction, mitochondria, oxidative stress and endocytosis, suggesting an early trajectory of photoreceptor cell death. Our results implicate an essential role of the RabGEF1-modulated endocytic and autophagic pathways in photoreceptor differentiation and homeostasis. We propose that RabGEF1 and associated components are potential candidates for syndromic traits that include a retinopathy phenotype.

Author summary

Endocytosis and autophagy are evolutionarily conserved processes that are essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis. RabGEF1 is a major regulator of the Rab5-GTPase, which participates in key steps during endocytosis and autophagy. We demonstrate that loss of RabGEF1 in mice causes specific developmental defects during photoreceptor outer segment formation, leading to visual dysfunction as early as eye opening followed by retinal degeneration. Rabgef1-/- retina shows a clear reduction in early endosomes as well as accumulation of autophagic vacuoles in developing photoreceptors. Together with transcriptome analysis, our studies suggest a trajectory of cellular events including altered autophagy that precede photoreceptor cell death in the absence of RabGEF1 and establish a critical role of endocytosis and autophagy in retinal development and proteostasis.

Introduction

Despite extensive phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity, functional defects and/or death of photoreceptors are the primary cause of vision impairment in retinal and macular degenerative diseases [13] (https://sph.uth.edu/retnet/). The retinal photoreceptors, rods and cones, are highly metabolically active sensory neurons that are responsible for dim and daylight vision, respectively. Rod and cone photoreceptors initiate vision by photon capture in morphologically distinct modified primary cilia (called outer segments) containing stacks of membranous discs with embedded opsin visual pigment(s) and transmit visual information to inner retina neurons through ribbon synapses [4,5]. Differentiation of these structurally and functionally unique cells in the developing mammalian retina spans a long period (3–4 weeks in mice and several months in humans) and is dictated by a select subset of transcriptional regulatory proteins [6,7]. Circadian-controlled shedding and subsequent renewal of outer segment discs are critical for functional maintenance of photoreceptors and involve extensive membrane turnover, polarized protein transport and stringent control of all facets of intracellular trafficking [8]. Not surprisingly, genetic defects affecting outer segment biogenesis and ciliary transport processes constitute almost one-third of all inherited retinal diseases [912].

Endocytosis is an essential evolutionarily conserved process for internalization of extracellular molecules, signal transduction and turnover of plasma membrane components, which are critical for maintaining cellular functions and homeostasis [1316]. Distinct steps of the endocytic pathway occur in specific subcellular compartments and involve a number of small GTPases and associated proteins; of these, Rab (Ras-Related Proteins in the Brain) proteins and their effectors are implicated in almost all aspects of this intricate process [17]. Like other small monomeric GTPases of the Ras superfamily, Rabs are ubiquitously expressed binary molecular switches, cycling between an inactive GDP-bound state in the cytosol and an active GTP-bound state on vesicle membranes [17,18]. The cycle of Rab activation involves the recruitment of a wide array of effector molecules to control vesicular trafficking within the endocytic pathway including but not limited to vesicle budding, motility, tethering and fusion [19,20]. Dysfunction of Rabs or their effectors results in diverse clinical phenotypes affecting nearly all tissues and organ systems [21,22]. Mutations in two of the Rab family proteins, Rab27 and Rab28, have been associated with retinal dystrophies [23,24]. Notably, Rab28 is required for turnover of endocytosed proteins and for lysosomal delivery of protein cargo in Trypanosoma brucei [25]. However, the relationship of Rabs and their effectors to endocytosis has not been explored in the retina.

Studies in Xenopus retina provided the first direct evidence of endocytosis in vertebrate rod photoreceptors to presumably recover and recycle molecular components from the inner segment plasma membrane [26]. In later studies, synaptic vesicle endocytosis was also demonstrated in Salamander cone photoreceptors as a likely mechanism to maintain neurotransmitter release at a high physiological rate [27]. Additionally, maintenance of rhabdomeres (outer segment-like structures) in Drosophila photoreceptors reportedly requires endocytosis [28]. However, we currently have a poor understanding of the endocytic pathway and its relevance in the mammalian retina, especially, in photoreceptors.

Advances in next generation sequencing technology have permitted transcriptome profiling of different tissues and cell types even at a single cell level. Taking advantage of the published transcriptome datasets (https://neicommons.nei.nih.gov/#/analysis), we identified the endocytic regulator Rabgef1 as the only Rab-associated gene showing increasing expression during retinal development. Herein we show that the Rabgef1-/- retina exhibits little visual function at eye opening in mice, with relatively fast photoreceptor degeneration due to compromised biogenesis of outer segment discs and accumulation of autophagosome-like vesicles within the inner segment region. Based on immunostaining and retinal transcriptome analysis, we propose a likely cellular sequence of events including decreased autophagic flux that lead to photoreceptor cell death in the absence of RabGEF1. Our studies provide direct support for the centrality of RabGEF1, and consequently its target Rabs, in endocytic and/or autophagic events during functional maturation and homeostasis of retinal photoreceptors. We suggest that RabGEF1 and related components should be considered as candidates for human retinopathies and/or syndromes that include a photoreceptor degeneration phenotype.

Results

Rabgef1 expression during retinal differentiation

We examined the expression of all Rabs and related effector proteins in transcriptome datasets of developing mouse retina [29,30] from embryonic day 11 (E11) to postnatal day 28 (P28) and identified Rabgef1 as the only Rab-associated gene that showed increasing expression from P6 onwards (S1 Table). RabGEF1 functions during endocytosis as a GEF of Rab5 through formation of an obligatory and tight physical complex with Rabaptin-5 [3133] (Fig 1A). When activated by the RabGEF1-Rabaptin5 complex, Rab5-GTP interacts with a variety of effector proteins including tethering factors such as Early Endosomal Antigen 1 (EEA1) and SNARE proteins such as Syntaxin13, leading to heterotypic fusion of clathrin-coated vesicles with early endosomes or homotypic fusion of early endosomes with each other [14,34] (Fig 1A). Activation of Rab5 by RabGEF1 promotes initial stages of the endocytic pathway, propelling cargoes along degradation or recycling routes [20]. Expression of Rabgef1 transcripts in the developing mouse retina paralleled the trajectory of rod and cone photoreceptor differentiation [35,36] (Fig 1B). In situ hybridization experiments revealed Rabgef1 mRNA in all retinal cell types, with strong expression noted within the outer nuclear layer (ONL) of photoreceptors (Fig 1C). Immunoblot analysis of mouse retinal extracts demonstrated the peak of RabGEF1 protein expression at P14 (at the time of eye opening), when photoreceptor outer segment formation and synaptogenesis are proceeding rapidly (Fig 1D and S1A Fig).

Fig 1. Spatiotemporal expression of Rabgef1 in the mouse retina.

Fig 1

(A) A schematic showing conserved functions of Rab5/RabGEF1 in endocytosis and autophagosome closure. (B) Rabgef1 expression in developing whole retina or flow-sorted rod and S-cone-like photoreceptors (identified from RNA-seq data in [30,36]). Nrl-GFP mice enabled purification of rod photoreceptors (Rods), whereas Nrl-GFP mice crossed with the cone-only Nrl-/- mice allowed sorting of S-cone-like photoreceptors [63]. (C) In situ hybridization profile of postnatal (P)21 control and Rabgef1-/- (KO) retina. Red/white punctate dots represent single Rabgef1 mRNA molecules. Arrow indicates high Rabgef1 transcripts in photoreceptor layer. Scale bar = 20 μm. ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer. (D) Immunoblot analysis of P4 –P28 control and Rabgef1-/- P14 retinal lysates probed with anti-RabGEF1 antibody. The total protein loading control is included in S1 Fig. (E) Immunohistochemistry of P14 control and Rabgef1-/- retinal sections using anti-RabGEF1 antibody. Arrows indicate high RabGEF1 expression in photoreceptor inner segments and synaptic terminals. Only non-specific background staining (punctate dots), also observed in control, is detected in Rabgef1-/- retinal sections. DAPI was used for visualizing nuclei. Scale bar = 20 μm.

To elucidate the function of RabGEF1 in the mammalian retina, we examined Rabgef1-/- (knockout, KO) mice [37] through postnatal development and later ages. As predicted, RabGEF1 protein was undetectable in the KO retina by immunoblotting (Fig 1D) and immunohistochemistry (Fig 1E). In contrast, RabGEF1 expression was readily detectable by immunoblotting of control retinas (Rabgef1+/+, Rabgef1+/-) (Fig 1D). RabGEF1 protein was also evident in photoreceptor inner segments and synaptic terminals in the outer plexiform layer (OPL) by immunostaining of control retinas (Fig 1E), though non-specific background staining was also observed in both control and KO samples.

Loss of RabGEF1 results in photoreceptor degeneration

Histology was performed for control and Rabgef1-/- mouse retina from developing (P10) to mature stages (P45). At early stages, retinal development appeared normal in Rabgef1-/- mice and was indistinguishable from littermate controls (Fig 2A and S1B Fig). However, the retina of P21 KO mice showed signs of thinning, and specific cell loss was evident within the ONL. Rapid loss of photoreceptors continued with age, and only 1–2 rows of cells remained in the ONL by P45 (Fig 2A and S1 Fig). While rod outer segments were noticeably shorter by P21 as indicated by rhodopsin immunostaining (S2 Fig). Cones, bipolar, amacrine, horizontal and ganglion cells appeared to be largely unaffected in the KO retina at P21 based on immunostaining of cell-type specific markers (S2 Fig). Notably, S-opsin staining was dramatically reduced at P45 (S2 Fig, right panel). As predicted, immunostaining of ribeye (a marker of photoreceptor synaptic ribbons) was progressively reduced in the OPL, and GFAP reactivity (a marker of activated Müller glia) was elevated in Rabgef1-/- retina due to photoreceptor degeneration (S2 Fig).

Fig 2. Rapid photoreceptor degeneration and loss of visual function in Rabgef1-/- mice.

Fig 2

(A) H&E staining of developing control and Rabgef1-/- retina, showing near complete ablation of photoreceptors (ONL) by postnatal day 45. Scale bar = 50 μm. ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. (B, C) ERG stimulus intensity-amplitude functions in the control and KO mice reared in a 12h light/12h dark cycle and measured at postnatal day 15 and 21 (P15, P21), respectively. (D) ERG stimulus intensity-amplitude functions in control and Rabgef1-/- mice born and raised in the dark. Dark-reared Rabgef1-/- mice have similar ERG stimulus intensity-amplitude functions as animals reared in cyclic light. Asterisks indicate p-value < 0.05 (*), <0.01 (**) and <0.001 (***) as determined by a t-test using Prizm software. In panels B and C, n = 7–10 per genotype and in D, 2–3 per genotype. Error bars indicate SD.

We performed electroretinogram (ERG) recordings to test for visual function. Rabgef1-/- retina showed diminished responses to light stimuli compared to littermate controls at different ages (Fig 2B and S3 Fig). The dark-adapted (scotopic) a-waves reflecting rod photoreceptor function, and the corresponding b-waves originating from inner retina neurons, were dramatically reduced as early as P15 in the mutant retina (Fig 2B), demonstrating functional deficits in rod phototransduction and in synaptic transmission to inner retinal neurons despite apparently normal morphology (see Fig 2A). Compared to littermate controls, Rabgef1-/- retina also showed significantly reduced light-adapted (photopic) b-waves, indicating a compromised cone-mediated visual response. By P21, rod responses (scotopic) were barely detectable in KO retina, and cone responses (photopic) were greatly reduced (Fig 2C and S3 Fig). Notably, at least half of the rods remain at this age in the KO retina as indicated by ONL thickness (Fig 2A), suggesting a functional defect in rods beyond the underlying cell loss. In a number of retinal degeneration models, cell loss is accelerated by light exposure. To determine whether the decline in visual function in Rabgef1-/- mice was similarly exacerbated by light, ERGs were recorded from animals reared in the dark from birth. No significant effect of dark rearing was detected on rod or cone photoreceptor function in the KO retina (Fig 2D), and ERG traces were comparable to animals reared under standard cyclic lighting (S3 Fig). Thus, visual function decline in the Rabgef1-/- retina is independent of light exposure.

Outer segment biogenesis is compromised in the Rabgef1-/- retina

Immunohistochemical analysis of P14 Rabgef1-KO retina showed correct localization, yet reduced staining, of key outer segment proteins including rhodopsin, cyclic nucleotide gated channel α and β subunits (Cnga and Cngb) and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase β (Pde6b) (Fig 3A), suggesting that photoreceptor dysfunction at this early stage (see Fig 2B) cannot be solely attributed to mis-trafficking of phototransduction proteins. Immunoblotting of retinal proteins corroborated the immunohistochemical data and revealed a decrease in many outer segment proteins in Rabgef1-KO samples compared to littermate controls (Fig 3B).

Fig 3. Reduced immunostaining of outer segment proteins in the Rabgef1-/- retina.

Fig 3

(A) Immunohistochemistry of P15 retinas using antibodies against proteins of the phototransduction cascade and proteins required for outer segment integrity. Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI. ONL, outer nuclear layer; OS, outer segments. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B) Immunoblots of proteins from retinal lysates through development, from P6—P14. Rabgef1-/- retinal lysate protein levels appear reduced at all developmental stages compared to littermate controls. γ-tubulin and Histone H3 are used as loading controls. 40 μg of protein loaded per lane.

To determine why the Rabgef1-KO retina exhibits a dramatically reduced visual response at early developmental timepoints despite correct localization of phototransduction proteins, we performed ultrastructural analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Around the time of eye opening (P14), we noted fewer, stunted and disorganized outer segments in the Rabgef1-/- retina compared to controls (Fig 4A). Furthermore, at higher magnification, large electron-dense and amorphous aggregates contained within vacuoles with the appearance of autophagic organelles (black arrowheads) were consistently detected in the inner segments of many photoreceptors in P14 KO retinas (Fig 4B). Additional TEM analysis of Rabgef1-/- retinas revealed the presence of these aggregates in a few photoreceptors as early as P10 (S4 Fig), with progressive and rather dramatic increase in both rods and cones by retinal maturity around P22 (Fig 4C and S4 Fig). Overall, these results indicate that the loss of Rabgef1 specifically leads to early cellular defects in outer segment biogenesis, with concomitant accumulation of amorphous aggregates within the inner segments before photoreceptor degeneration is evident by histology.

Fig 4. Loss of Rabgef1 causes accumulation of amorphous, electron-dense structures in the photoreceptors.

Fig 4

(A) Transmission electron micrographs of control and Rabgef1-/- retinas at around eye opening (P14). White box highlights accumulation of amorphous, electron-dense structures in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptor inner segment regions. (B) Magnification of white boxed area in panel A and an image at the same magnification but in P22 Rabgef1-/- retina (C), demonstrating the accumulation of electron-dense deposits in photoreceptor cytoplasm (black arrowheads).

Loss of RabGEF1 results in reduction of early endosomes

To investigate whether RabGEF1also functions in the endocytic pathway in the mammalian retina, we performed co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify its interacting proteins using P14 mouse retina extracts. As predicted, RabGEF1 was immunoprecipitated from control retinal extracts with anti-RabGEF1 antibody but not with control IgG (Fig 5A). Re-probing of the immunoblot revealed co-immunoprecipitation of Rabaptin-5 with RabGEF1, consistent with their coordinated function in endocytosis. We then performed mass spectrometry analysis of the anti-RabGEF1 and IgG-immunoprecipitated proteins from control and KO retinal lysates. Our analysis confirmed an interaction between RabGEF1 and Rabaptin-5 (also known as Rabep1) in a 2:1 stoichiometry (Fig 5B), similar to previously published data [32,33]. We also observed an interaction of RabGEF1 with the Rabaptin-5 paralog Rabep2. Neither Rabaptin-5 nor Rabep2 were detected by co-immunoprecipitation of control retina extract with rabbit IgG or from Rabgef1-/- retinal lysate with anti-RabGEF1 antibody (Fig 5B). Together, these data suggest that RabGEF1 exerts a conserved endocytic function in the mammalian retina as shown in other somatic cell types.

Fig 5. Conserved endocytic function of RabGEF1 in the retina.

Fig 5

(A) Immunoblot analyses of Rabbit-IgG and anti-RabGEF1 pulldown (PD) protein complexes (from 40 μg retinal lysate) with antibodies against RabGEF1 and Rabaptin5. Input was 3% of the protein from the control P21 mouse retinal lysate. Rabbit-IgG served as a negative control. (B) Mass spectrometry analysis of RabGEF1 co-immunoprecipitated proteins from P21 control and Rabgef1-/- retinas. RabGEF1 binds to Rabaptin-5 in a 1:2 ratio respectively (n = 2). (C) Immunohistochemistry with anti-EEA1 antibody on control and Rabgef1-/- retinal slices. Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI. IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer. Scale bar = 20 μm. Boxed areas indicate regions of retina that were quantified, also shown at larger scale in S5B Fig. (D) Quantitative measurements of EEA1-positive endosomes at P10, 12 and 14 control and Rabgef1-/- individual z-stack images of the inner segment regions. (E) Immunoblot of control and Rabgef1-/- P14 retinal lysates probed with anti-EEA1. Anti-beta-actin was used as a loading control. There is no significant difference between EEA1 protein amounts in control and Rabgef1-/- retinal lysates Asterisks indicate p-value < 0.05 (*) and < 0.01 (**) as determined by t-test using Prizm software. In panels D and E, n = 3 biological replicates. Error bars indicate SD.

RabGEF1 is known to be an activator of the Rab5 subfamily. Immunoblot analysis did not show any change in expression of Rab5 in the KO retina (S5A Fig). To evaluate whether Rab5 is functional, we examined control and KO retina by immunostaining for early endosomal antigen 1 (EEA1), a direct effector of activated Rab5-GTP associated with endocytic vesicles during the process of fusion [38]. Interestingly, EEA1+ puncta were present throughout photoreceptor inner segments (white arrows) and in OPL (Fig 5C and S5B Fig) of developing control and Rabgef1-/- retina (P10, P12, P14). However, much less EEA1 immunoreactivity (representing reduced membrane association or fewer endocytic vesicles) was detected in the photoreceptor inner segments of KO retina compared to controls. Quantification revealed a significant reduction in the number of EEA1+ vesicles in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors compared to littermate controls (Fig 5D and S5B Fig). This reduction in EEA1-positive endosomes is likely not due to reduced expression of the EEA1 protein, as immmunoblotting detected similar levels in control and KO retina extracts (Fig 5E). These results suggest a significant loss of EEA1+ early endocytic vesicles, probably causing perturbation of endocytic fusion in the Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors.

Autophagy is altered in Rabgef1-KO photoreceptors

The endocytic machinery in general [16] and RabGEF1 and Rab5 in particular [39,40] play important roles in modulating autophagy. A reduction in early endosomes and existence of vacuoles with electron-dense aggregates in KO photoreceptors suggested autophagy alterations in the absence of RabGEF1. We therefore performed immunohistochemical staining of P10 to P21 control and KO retinas using an antibody to the autophagy marker, microtubule light-chain 3, isoforms A and B (LC3A/B). We observed the presence of LC3A/B-positive autophagosomes specifically in the photoreceptor layer of the KO retina (white arrows) as early as P12, with progressive increase and wider distribution throughout the cell at later stages (Fig 6A). Lower magnification images of LC3A/B staining revealed that autophagosomes in KO retina were restricted to a subset of photoreceptors (ONL and IS layers) and were undetectable in other retinal cell types (Fig 6B). Immunoblot analysis of retinal lysates also indicated an increase in the lipidated, membrane-bound LC3A/B-II form in the Rabgef1-/- retina (Fig 6C). LC3A/B+ autophagosome structures were not observed in control retina at any developmental stage examined. Moreover, accumulation of LC3A/B+ autophagosomes and/or electron dense structures were not detected in other mouse models of retinal degeneration including the Rhodopsin T17M, Rd1, and Rds mutants (S5C and S5D Fig), suggesting a specific autophagic alteration in Rabgef1-KO retina unrelated to other mechanisms of photoreceptor cell death.

Fig 6. Loss of Rabgef1 leads to autophagy defects in the retinal photoreceptors.

Fig 6

(A) Immunohistochemistry of control and Rabgef1-/- retinas using anti-LC3A/B antibody. Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar = 20 μm. ONL, outer nuclear layer; IS, inner segment. (B) Low magnification images of anti-LC3A/B staining in P17 retina. Scale bar = 20 μm. INL, inner nuclear layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. (C) Immunoblot of P12 and 14 control and Rabgef1-/- retinal lysates probed with antibody to LC3A/B (upper panel). Lower arrowhead indicates increase in the LC3A/B-II lipidated form in Rabgef1-/- retinas. For quantification of LC3A/B-II level, P12 and P14 band intensities were combined and normalized to γ-tubulin (lower panel). (D) Left panels show low-magnification images of anti-p62 staining in P17 retina. Scale bar = 50 μm. Right panels show the same sections imaged at high magnification using Airyscan (AS*). Scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Transmission electron micrographs of Rabgef1-/- photoreceptor inner segments at P17 immunolabeled with anti-p62/immunogold or immunogold without primary antibody. Arrowheads indicate anti-p62 immunolabeling in electron-dense deposits. Scale bar = 500 nm. (F) Immunoblot of P14 control and Rabgef1-/- retinal lysates probed with antibody to p62. β-actin was used as a loading control.

Immunostaining for the autophagy cargo adapter marker p62 (also known as SQSTM1) demonstrated a similar pattern with positive labeling restricted to the photoreceptor layer of KO retina (Fig 6D). High-resolution imaging of p62 staining using the Zeiss LSM880 Airyscan microscope (Fig 6D, right panels) showed a localization pattern reminiscent of the electron-dense structures observed in TEM images (see Fig 4). To determine whether these structures were indeed autophagic vacuoles, post-embedding immunoelectron microscopy was performed with anti-p62 antibody. Indeed, we observed p62 immunogold labeling associated with electron-dense amorphous deposits in the inner segments of KO photoreceptors (Fig 6E). p62 immunostaining was not detected in photoreceptors of control retina by either confocal or electron microscopy. Immunoblot analysis of control and KO retinal protein lysates revealed no appreciable difference in p62 (Fig 6F), probably because p62 accumulation was limited to a subset of photoreceptor cells.

We then isolated vesicular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retinas. Mass spectrometry analysis of these fractions identified 1176 proteins in the control and 1085 in the KO, with significant differences between the two fractions (S6A Fig and S2 Table). Quantitative comparison and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed the absence of or a significant decrease in many proteins associated with phototransduction (such as Gnat1/2, Pde6a, Grk1 and Sag), mitochondrial homeostasis (including Atp5l, Atp5h, Dlat, Cisd1), and synaptic transmission (e.g., Syn1, Syn2, SV2a, SV2b, Snap25) in the KO vesicle fraction (S6B and S6C Fig and S2 Table).

Transcriptome profiling identifies early changes in developing Rabgef1-/- retina

To gain insights into early cellular changes resulting from the loss of RabGEF1, we performed comparative analysis of Rabgef1-KO versus control retinal transcriptomes at three key developmental ages: P6, P10 (before degeneration is evident), and P14 (when photoreceptors show ultrastructural and visual function defects but without cell loss). Differential expression (DE) analysis identified global expression changes as a prelude to photoreceptor degeneration, with a total of 2469 significant DE genes that could be categorized to specific cellular pathways including phototransduction, mitochondria, oxidative stress and endocytosis (Fig 7A). We then performed Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG and Reactome pathway analysis of DE genes (Fig 7B). Several genes associated with phototransduction and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation showed consistently lower expression at early stages (P6 and P10) of photoreceptor differentiation in the KO retina (Fig 7C). We note that the expression of these genes increases during normal development of photoreceptors [36]. We also observed altered expression of a number of oxidative stress response genes at the three stages examined (S7 Fig). Interestingly however, autophagy-associated genes were not differentially expressed in the transcriptome analysis (S8 Fig). Nevertheless, higher expression of lysosomal and early endosomal genes in the P14 Rabgef1-KO retina (Fig 7E) indicates an adaptive response to decreased protein recycling and degradation. The transcriptomic analysis of Rabgef1-KO retina thus highlights multiple cellular and developmental processes that are impacted by the absence of RabGEF1 before photoreceptor degeneration is evident after eye opening (P14).

Fig 7. Transcriptomic changes in the Rabgef1-/- retina.

Fig 7

(A) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in pairwise comparisons of age-matched control (WT) and Rabgef1-/-(KO) retina. The annotation block indicates whether differentially expressed genes are part of Mitochondria (Mitocarta), Phototransduction, Oxidative stress response pathway, and/or Endocytosis pathways. (B) Functional enrichment plot of differentially expressed genes for each time point. Colored shapes represent the source of pathways or gene groups: Gene Ontology Biological Processes (BP; gold square), Gene Ontology Cellular Component (CC; grey diamond), KEGG (purple triangle), or Reactome (blue circle). Only top 10 most significant (by p-value) pathways are plotted. (C) Early changes in Rabgef1-/- retina at P6. Volcano plots show differential expression of phototransduction and OXPHOS genes at P6, soon after rod photoreceptor birth. Red and blue labels in volcano plots denote gene over- and under- expression with significance, respectively. (D) Volcano plots showing continued downregulation of phototransduction and OXPHOS genes in Rabgef1-/- retina at P10. (E) Volcano plots showing significant upregulation of lysosomal and early endosome related genes in Rabgef1-/- retina at P14. (F) A possible model of photoreceptor cell death in mouse retina lacking RabGEF1, illustrating the centrality of its function in endocytosis and autophagy during normal development and homeostasis.

Discussion

Internalization of macromolecules and recycling or turnover of membrane components by endocytosis are critical for diverse cellular functions that maintain homeostasis. Rab5 and its regulators RabGEF1 and Rabaptin-5 are required for the biogenesis of early endosomes [41], which then deliver cargo macromolecules to recycling or degradation pathways [20]. In addition to promoting Rab5 activity as a GEF, RabGEF1 also binds ubiquitin [42] and its recruitment to the early endosome is controlled by ubiquitination [43]. Notably, the function of RabGEF1 has been investigated primarily in cell culture systems [32,42,44]. Only a few studies have been performed in vivo; specifically, the absence of RabGEF1 in mast cells and epidermal keratinocytes was demonstrated to contribute to skin inflammation in Rabgef1-KO mice [37,45]. Here, we implicate, for the first time, a critical function of RabGEF1 during photoreceptor maturation in the developing mammalian retina. The loss of RabGEF1 leads to severe defects in outer segment maintenance and phototransduction likely due to a decrease in protein recycling and membrane turnover caused by reduction in early endosomes marked by the Rab5-GTP effector protein EEA1. Concurrent to and/or followed by these events in developing photoreceptors, we demonstrate microscopically evident accumulation of macromolecular aggregates at P14 (eye opening) likely resulting from altered autophagy, which we propose leads to relatively fast photoreceptor cell death.

Developmentally regulated expression, concordant with photoreceptor morphogenesis [6] and significant loss of visual function in Rabgef1-/- mice as early as eye opening (P14/P15), implied a major contribution of RabGEF1 to functional maturation and survival of retinal photoreceptors. We were intrigued by the photoreceptor-specific impact of RabGEF1 loss despite the ubiquitous nature of its function in endocytosis. Photoreceptor cell death was minimal at P14 and was only becoming evident by P21. Ectopic accumulation of outer segment proteins was not detected in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors; instead, slower biogenesis of outer segments appeared to result from reduced amount of OS bound proteins that reach their destination. Structural defects and reduced expression of phototransduction proteins can account only in part for disproportionately severe deficits in rod and cone function (both a- and b-wave) at P15 and P21. Dark rearing that slows photoreceptor degeneration in several retinal disease models (e.g., those with dominant rhodopsin mutations or with loss of the visual arrestin) did not have any impact on visual responses of Rabgef1-/- mice. Another possible contributor to visual function defects could be a decrease in endocytosis leading to perturbation of synaptic transmission from photoreceptors to bipolar neurons. Rab5 is essential for synaptic vesicle endocytosis and recycling [46]. A quantifiable and significant reduction in EEA1-positive puncta (without a change in EEA1 protein itself) representing early endosomes in Rabgef1-/-photoreceptor inner segments is consistent with decreased endocytosis upon knockdown of Rab5 isoforms [41]. The almost 3-fold decrease in several synaptic proteins in the vesicle fraction of KO retina (see S2 Table) is likely reflective of reduced endocytosis as well.

Reduced endocytosis, however, cannot satisfactorily explain the relatively fast death of photoreceptors in the absence of RabGEF1. We were intrigued by the accumulation of large amorphous electron-dense material within autophagosome-like structures observed upon ultrastructural analysis of Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors as early as eye opening in P14 retina. We wondered whether RabGEF1 loss leads to dysregulation of autophagy in photoreceptors. Both endocytosis and autophagy involve fusion of membrane vesicles to lysosomes for degradation and utilize many similar components associated with cell signaling and trafficking [47,48]; this convergence has implicated a regulatory crosstalk between these two evolutionarily conserved transport pathways that control cellular homeostasis. Rab5 directly regulates autophagosome formation in the canonical autophagy pathway [39,49]. However, its association with the autophagy marker LC3 is also implicated in endocytic removal of β-amyloid in a mouse Alzheimer’s disease model [50]. Notably, siRNA-mediated silencing of Rabgef1 is shown to result in enhanced autophagy in C. elegans [51] and the involvement of the ubiquitin-binding domain is suggested to be responsible for RabGEF1’s ability to switch back and forth between endocytic and autophagic functions [52]. Our results demonstrating enhanced LC3 immunoreactivity in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors strongly implicate a direct role of Rab5 and RabGEF1 in maintaining normal autophagic homeostasis [53].

At present, we cannot conclude whether the autophagy phenotype of the Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors reflects increased autophagy initiation or decreased autophagy flux. A distinction between these two possibilities would require pharmacologic manipulations (e.g., bafilomycin A1 treatment) that are only feasible in cell culture systems. Increased autophagy initiation could be a response to the accumulation of internalized proteins that cannot recycle back to the plasma membrane or traffic to lysosomes via late endosomes. This interpretation would be in line with the enhanced autophagy observed upon silencing of Rabgef1 in C. elegans [51]. On the other hand, decreased autophagic flux could result from the involvement of Rab5 and RabGEF1 in autophagosome biogenesis [39,49]. The increased immunostaining of p62-positive aggregates in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors observed in our studies would be most consistent with this latter possibility, since p62 itself is degraded by autophagy. We note that aggregates of p62 and LC3 visualized by immunofluorescence staining in the Rabgef1-/- retina were detected only in a subset of photoreceptors and that the immunoblot analysis of p62 and LC3 protein levels was performed with total retinal extracts. p62 and LC3 aggregates in Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors reflect undigested autophagosomes, and the total amount of the two proteins might not be dramatically altered in the whole retina. Further autophagic flux experiments will be required to elucidate the underlying defects in the process. In any event, we hypothesize that reduced endocytic trafficking and accumulation of membrane components in autophagic vesicles disrupts normal physiological functions leading to death of photoreceptor cells (Fig 7F). Consistent with this hypothesis, temporal transcriptomic profiling of KO retina reveals early changes in the gene expression associated with phototransduction and ciliary proteins resulting in aberrant photoreceptor maturation. We also uncovered dysregulation of genes associated with mitochondria, which could contribute to enhanced oxidative stress in photoreceptors prior to cell death. Augmented expression of endosomal and lysosomal genes is likely indicative of a photoreceptors’ compensatory response in an attempt to eliminate accumulated protein aggregates. We note that disruption of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway followed by abnormal mitochondrial turnover in rod photoreceptors has been suggested to cause early retinal degeneration in mice carrying a mutation in the Cln6 gene (Cln6nclf) [54].

In conclusion, our studies uncover a direct and critical role of RabGEF1 in the endocytic and autophagic pathways during functional maturation of mammalian photoreceptors and demonstrate that the loss of RabGEF1 leads to photoreceptor developmental defects and relatively fast retinal degeneration likely because of compromised recycling and proteostasis. We suggest that Rabgef1 and other endocytosis/autophagy-associated effector genes should be considered as candidates for syndromic diseases that include photoreceptor dysfunction or degeneration.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All procedures involving the use of mice were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Eye Institute (ASP #650) and performed in accordance with the Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

Animals

BALB/cJ mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Germantown, MD, USA). Rabgef1-/- mice have been described previously [37]. Rabgef1+/- males (from Dr. S. Galli, Stanford University) were crossed to wildtype BALB/cJ females to refresh the colony. We used intercrosses of heterozygous mice (KO mice were not viable on BL/6 background) after genotyping using the following: shared primer (6505) 5’- TTA GAG GAG GTT GTG AGC TGCCAT-3’; wildtype primer (6506) 5’- TGC AGC TTA CTC AGG CAT GGA AGA-3’; and mutant primer (6534) 5’-GAC GTG CTA CTT CCA TTT GTC ACG -3’. The PCR was performed as follows: Step 1. 94°C for 60 sec. Step 2. 94°C for 15 sec. Step 3. 66°C for 60 sec. Step 4. 72°C 90 sec. Repeat steps 2, 3, and 4 for 35–40 cycles, depending on concentration of starting DNA. Step 5. 72°C 10 min. Step 6. 4°C. It should be noted that the Rabgef1 PCR reaction required 0.5M Betaine (Sigma) and 3% DMSO by volume, in order to stabilize the DNA within the reaction. The mutant band is 1 kb in size, while the wildtype is 840 bp. Original founders were negative for Rd1 and Rd10 mutant alleles that are sometimes present within inbred mouse strains. Male and female mice were used equally in all experimental procedures and maintained on a normal 12 h light/dark cycle (unless otherwise noted) with unlimited access to food and water. Both heterozygous and wildtype littermates were used as controls.

Electroretinogram (ERG) recordings

The mice were dark-adapted overnight and prepared for recording under dim-red illumination. The pupils were dilated by topical administration of tropicamide (1% wt/vol, Alcon) and phenylephrine (2.5% wt/vol, Alcon). Proparacaine hydrochloride (0.5% wt/vol, Alcon) was applied for topical eye anesthesia. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) by I.P. injection of 0.1 mL/10 g body weight of anesthetic solution (1 mL of 100 mg/mL ketamine and 0.1 mL of 100 mg/mL xylazine in 8.9 mL 1X PBS). Body temperature was maintained at 37°C on a heating platform. Gonioscopic Prism solution (2.5% wt/vol, Hypomellose Ophthalmic Demulcent solution, Alcon) was applied to each eye, and gold wire loop electrodes were placed on corneas, with the reference electrode placed in the mouth. Flash ERG recordings were taken simultaneously from both eyes using an Espion E2 Visual Electrophysiological System (Diagnosys). Rod and mixed rod-cone ERG responses were recorded at increasing light intensities over the range of 0.0001–10 cd‧s/m2 under dark adapted conditions. The stimulus interval between flashes varied from 5 s at the lowest stimulus strengths to 60 s at the highest ones. Two to ten responses were averaged depending on flash intensity. The mouse was then light adapted for photopic responses for 2 minutes in the Ganzfeld dome. Recordings were carried out at light intensities over 0.3–100 cd‧s/m2 under a background light that saturates rod function. Twenty to 30 responses were averaged. ERG signals were sampled at 1000 Hz and recorded with a 0.3 Hz low-frequency and 300-Hz high frequency cutoffs. The a-wave amplitude was measured from the baseline to the negative peak, and the b-wave was measured from the a-wave trough to the maximum positive peak. To compare ERG data between control and Rabgef1-/- animals at each intensity, we first averaged the ERG amplitude data for the two eyes of each mouse and then averaged the data for all mice within a single group (e.g., genotype). Statistical values were calculated using Prism Software with one two-tailed unpaired t-test performed per row. P values were computed with more power, assuming that all rows are sampled from populations with the same scatter (SD). Multiple comparisons were corrected for using the Holm-Sidak method to calculate statistical significance. * (0.033), ** (0.002), *** (<0.001).

Histology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

For standard histology, mice were euthanized, the anterior segment was removed before fixing eyecups in 4% glutaraldehyde in 1X PBS for 30 min. Eyecups were then transferred to 4% PFA in 1X PBS until being embedded in glycol methylacrylate. Sections were cut 5-micron thick, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 brightfield microscope. For TEM, eyes were fixed in PBS-buffered glutaraldehyde (2.5% at pH 7.4) and PBS-buffered osmium tetroxide (0.5%) and embedded in epoxy resin. Thin 90 nm sections were collected on 200-mesh copper grids, dried for 24 h, and double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were viewed and photographed using a JEOL JM-1010 electron microscope.

For TEM immunolabeling, eyes were enucleated, incised at the limbus and fixed by immersion in cold 2% paraformaldehyde in 1X PBS for 1 hour. Anterior segment and lens were dissected. Eye cups were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30% - 85% ethanol) on ice. Eye cups were transferred to LR White Resin (medium grade) (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield PA) for 1 hr then transferred to fresh LR White resin and infiltrated for 18 hours at 4 C. Eye cups were transferred to embedding molds containing fresh LR White and air was evacuated from molds to facilitate polymerization. The resin was polymerized for 24 hours at 60 C. A Leica UC6 ultramicrotome and diamond knife were used to cut thin sections which were collected on nickel grids. Sections were blocked in 5% normal goat serum diluted in EM ICC buffer (20mM Tris, 135 mM NaCl, 0.1% BSA, 0.05% Tween-20 pH 7.3) and immunolabeled with rabbit anti-P62 antibody (Abcam Cat #109012) at 8.6ug/ml diluted in EM ICC buffer for 2 hr at room temperature. Primary antibody was omitted from negative control samples. Grids were washed repeatedly and incubated in goat anti-rabbit 20nm gold (Abcam Cat # 27237) diluted 1:20 in EM ICC buffer for 1 hr, washed repeated and fixed for 5 min in 2% glutaraldehyde, washed in distilled water and allowed to dry. Grids were stained with 1% uranyl acetate for 18 minutes and Reynold’s lead citrate for 5 minutes. Grids were imaged on either a JEOL 1010 or JEOL 1200 EX II.

Immunoblot and immunoprecipitation

Immunoblotting was performed as described [55] using antibodies listed in S3 Table. Images are representative of at least three biological replicates. Densitometric analysis was performed using either ImageJ or Image Lab (BioRad) by normalizing proteins to β-actin, γ-tubulin, or total protein. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired t-test within the Prism Program.

The Dynabeads (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) protocol was used for immunoprecipitation studies. Briefly, 5μg Rabex5/RabGEF1 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was covalently conjugated to 1 mg of Dynabeads and incubated overnight with retina extracts at 4°C. After removing the supernatant, beads were washed with cold immunoprecipitation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 40 mM Tris-HCL pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 10% Glycerol with 1X Complete Protease Inhibitors (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) three times for 10 min each time. Beads were then washed with Dynabeads reagent, LWB, 3X for 10 mins minimum each time. Bound proteins were eluted in 20–40 μl of EB (elution buffer) from the Dynabeads kit and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Whole eyes were either frozen immediately in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) solution (Tissue Tek, Sakura, USA) (for fresh-frozen sections) or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30–60 min, followed by overnight cryoprotection in 30% sucrose in 1X PBS, and then embedded in OCT. The anterior segment was dissected from fixed eyes prior to embedding. Fresh frozen cryosections were post-fixed for 2–5 min with 4% PFA, and all cryosections were permeabilized and blocked with 5% Donkey Serum in 1X PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for at least 30 min at room temperature before incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibody concentrations and reaction conditions can be found in S3 Table. After antibody incubations, slides were washed for 30–60 min at room temperature with 1X PBS, mounted using Southern Biotech Fluoromount media (Birmingham, AL, USA), and viewed on a confocal laser scanning microscope unless otherwise indicated (Zeiss, Model 700 or 880 with Airyscan, Jena, Germany).

EEA1 (early endosomal antigen 1) quantitation in photoreceptors

Confocal images of EEA1-stained retina sections were collected in 4 slice Z-stacks with an interval of 0.5 μm, thus sampling from 2μM thickness of tissue. Image stacks were converted to grayscale and cropped to the photoreceptor inner/outer segment area where the bulk of the photoreceptor cellular machinery is located. EEA1-positive puncta were counted from individual slices using ImageJ.

In Situ hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions [Advanced Cell Diagnostic Biosystems (ACD), fluorescence protocol; Newark, CA, USA]. Specific probes were designed by ACD against the 3’ and 5’ untranslated regions of Rabgef1 transcript.

Preparation of vesicle fractions from mouse retina

Vesicle fractions enriched for autophagosomes were isolated from retinas of Rabgef1-KO and control mice using density gradient centrifugation, as described [56] with modifications suggested by Dr. S. Azadi. Briefly, 20 retinas of P14-P19 mice were homogenized in 500 μl of cold HEPES buffer (50mM each of HEPES, TES, Tricine, 100 mM NaCl, 10mM KCl, 1mM each of KH2PO4 and Na2SO4, 5mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2) pH 7.6 using a motorized pestle. After adding additional 500 μl of cold HEPES buffer, the suspension was passed 10 times through a 20G needle and incubated at 37°C for 3 h with 50 μM Vinblastine. This step blocks the translocation of autophagosomes to lysosomes. The sample was cooled and diluted three times with a hypotonic buffer (10mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) to lyse the cells and centrifuged for 5 min at 1400xg to remove nuclei and cell debris. The supernatant was treated with 0.5 mM of GPN (Glycyl-L-Phenylalanyl 2-naphthylamine) at 37°C for 10 min to disrupt and break the lysosomes. The sample was then centrifuged at 4000xg for 2 min to remove the remaining nuclear debris. The supernatant was loaded on top of a discontinuous Nycodenz gradient (2.9 ml of 22.5% at the bottom/ 6.7 ml of 9.5% in the middle/ 3.1 ml of the supernatant sample on the top) and centrifuged for 1 h at 28,000xg at 4 degrees. Two bands were collected, one at the interface between the sample and 9.5% Nycodez, and the other at the 9.5% and 22.5% interphase. The fractions containing partially purified autophagosomes were analyzed by immunoblotting and subjected to mass spectrometry.

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis

For proteome analysis, immunoprecipitated proteins were reduced, alkylated and trypsin digested as previously described [57]. Desalted tryptic peptides were analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer coupled with a UltiMate 3000-nLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data files were processed with Proteome Discoverer (v2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific) software, using Mascot v2.5.1 (Matrix Sciences) search node for peptide/protein identification. Target Decoy was used to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR) of peptide spectrum matches, set to a p-value <0.05 [58]. Geneset enrichment analysis with fold change ratio of peptide spectral match counts between KO and WT retina was performed as described in the RNA seq analyses section below.

RNA-seq analyses

Total retinal RNA was used for preparing libraries for RNA-seq, and the data was analyzed using Mus musculus annotations v84 from Ensembl as described [30,59]. Gene abundance were processed with edgeR and limma in R for normalization and differential expression tests between age-matched WT and Rabgef1-KO samples. A standard p-value cut off of 0.1 was used to qualify differentially expressed genes. Genelist enrichment was done with the gProfileR (v0.6.7) [60] package, whereas gene set enrichment analysis was performed using fgsea (v1.8.0) [61]. Reference pathway annotations for geneset enrichment analysis were obtained from ConsensusPathDB [62], GSKB (http://ge-lab.org/gskb/) and manually curated genelists for selected pathways, as described [30]. Additionally, R packages (tidyverse, pheatmap, eulerr and ggrepel) were used for analysis and visualization with custom scripts.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

(A) Total protein loading control (left panel) for RabGEF1 immunoblot shown in Fig 1D, and quantification of total RabGEF1 expression (right panel). (B) Quantification of outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness and inner and outer segment (IS-OS) length from hematoxylin and eosin stained sections.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Immunohistochemistry of control (Ctrl) and Rabgef1-/- (KO) littermate retinas at P10, P12 and P21 using cell type-specific antibody markers.

Rho (Rhodopsin, a marker of rods), Cone Arr (Cone arrestin, a marker of cones), PKC-α (a marker of ON-bipolar cells), Calbindin (a marker of Horizontal, Amacrine, and some Ganglion cells), GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein, marker of Müller glia stress), and Ribeye (a marker of photoreceptor ribbon synapses). Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI to visualize nuclei. OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 20 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Raw electroretinogram (ERG) traces from Rabgef1-KO and control animals.

Representative traces are shown at increasing light intensities for pairs of control and Rabgef1-KO animals. Reduced function is indicated by smaller a-wave (first negative peak) and b-wave (positive peak). The a- and b-wave peaks are labelled in the top left trace for reference.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Additional replicate transmission electron micrographs of Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors from P10 to P22 showing accumulation of amorphous proteolytic aggregates as development proceeds.

Scale bar = 2 μm.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Characterization of the Rabgef1-/- retina.

(A) Expression of Rab5 protein in Control (Con) and Rabgef1-KO (KO) animals at P14. (B) Representative EEA1 immunohistochemistry images used for quantification shown in Fig 5C and 5D. (C) Immunohistochemistry of anti-LC3A/B on Rhodopsin T17M mutant 6-week-old littermates. There is no visible accumulation of autophagosomes marked by LC3A/B. Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI. ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer. Scale bar = 20 μm. (D) TEM-acquired images of Rd1 and Rds mouse models of retinal degeneration.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Altered vesicular cargo composition in enriched fractions of Rabgef1-KO retina.

(A) Summary of proteins identified from mass spectrometric analysis of vesicle enriched sub-cellular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retina. The Venn diagram also shows how many of the detected proteins are annotated in endocytosis or autophagy pathways. (B) Cargo proteins enriched in control samples, ranked by decreasing order of enrichment (logFC Control/Rabgef1-/-). Proteins of Autophagy, Endocytosis, Mitocarta [64], Synapse and Phototransduction are highlighted in specific colors as described in the legend, or colored black if annotated in multiple categories. Proteins not belonging to the aforementioned groups are colored grey. (C) Enrichment plots for significant under enrichment of Phototransduction and Mitochondrial outer membrane gene sets as observed in gene set enrichment analyses of vesicular cargo from control and Rabgef1-/- retinas.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Dysregulation of oxidative stress response genes in the Rabgef1-KO retina.

Volcano plots summarize significant differential expression of genes associated with the oxidative stress response pathway at P6, P10, and P14. Each point represents a gene where labelled or colored red and blue denote significant over-expression and under-expression in Rabgef1-KO vs WT comparisons, respectively.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Transcriptional status of autophagy associated genes at different timepoints preceding Rabgef1-/- related degeneration.

Genes participating in distinct stages of autophagy, namely: Turning on the pathway, Initiation of autophagosome biogenesis, Building the autophagosome, and Fusing autophagosome with lysosome, were obtained from [65], and investigated for their activity in the Rabgef1-KO retina. Volcano plots are arranged in a grid of time versus stage of autophagy, and a point in the volcano plots represents a single gene where colors red and blue denote significant over-expression and under-expression in Rabgef1-KO vs WT comparisons, respectively.

(TIF)

S1 Table. RNA-expression of Rab family genes in mammalian retina (E11-P28) and isolated flow-sorted photoreceptors (P2-P8).

Gene-level quantification in counts per million (CPM; average of biological replicates) of Rabs and associated GEFs, GAPs and co-factors in the mouse retina, and flow sorted photoreceptors (FSPR)—rod and S-cone-like. Rabgef1 is highlighted and in bold to indicate its characteristic gene expression pattern during photoreceptor development. Data was extracted from Kim et al. 2016.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Mass spectrometry based proteomic characterization of endosomal vesicular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retina (n = 20 pooled P14-P19 retinas per genotype).

All identified protein species are listed with peptide spectral match (PSM) counts from control and Rabgef1-/- samples. Fold change is calculated by dividing PSM counts from Rabgef1-/- samples to controls.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Resource table listing all antibodies used within the study.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. Mindy Tsai, See-Ying Tam and Stephen Galli at Stanford University for providing the Rabgef1+/- mice and for technical advice during the study, to Megan Kopera and the NEI Genome Engineering Core for re-derivation of the Rabgef1-/- line. We acknowledge Ximena Corso-Diaz, Thad Whitaker and Christie Campla for technical advice. We thank Dr. Seifolla Azadi for retinal vesicle isolation protocol, Dr. Christopher K. E. Bleck, NHLBI Electron Microscopy Core and Dr. Mones Abu-Asab, NEI Electron Microscopy Core for access to TEM facilities. This study utilized the high-performance computational capabilities of the Biowulf Linux cluster at National Institutes of Health (http://biowulf.nih.gov).

Data Availability

Raw and processed RNA seq datasets from this study have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession GSE138672. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE138672).

Funding Statement

These studies were supported by Intramural Research program of the National Eye Institute (ZIAEY000450 and ZIAEY000546 to AS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Wright AF, Chakarova CF, Abd El-Aziz MM, Bhattacharya SS. Photoreceptor degeneration: genetic and mechanistic dissection of a complex trait. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(4):273–84. Epub 2010/03/10. 10.1038/nrg2717 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Broadgate S, Yu J, Downes SM, Halford S. Unravelling the genetics of inherited retinal dystrophies: Past, present and future. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;59:53–96. Epub 2017/04/02. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.03.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verbakel SK, van Huet RAC, Boon CJF, den Hollander AI, Collin RWJ, Klaver CCW, et al. Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:157–86. Epub 2018/03/30. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lamb TD, Collin SP, Pugh EN Jr. Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(12):960–76. Epub 2007/11/21. 10.1038/nrn2283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.May-Simera H, Nagel-Wolfrum K, Wolfrum U. Cilia—The sensory antennae in the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;60:144–80. Epub 2017/05/16. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.05.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Swaroop A, Kim D, Forrest D. Transcriptional regulation of photoreceptor development and homeostasis in the mammalian retina. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(8):563–76. Epub 2010/07/22. 10.1038/nrn2880 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brzezinski JA, Reh TA. Photoreceptor cell fate specification in vertebrates. Development. 2015;142(19):3263–73. Epub 2015/10/08. 10.1242/dev.127043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pearring JN, Salinas RY, Baker SA, Arshavsky VY. Protein sorting, targeting and trafficking in photoreceptor cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;36:24–51. Epub 2013/04/09. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Estrada-Cuzcano A, Roepman R, Cremers FP, den Hollander AI, Mans DA. Non-syndromic retinal ciliopathies: translating gene discovery into therapy. Human molecular genetics. 2012;21(R1):R111–24. 10.1093/hmg/dds298 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rachel RA, Li T, Swaroop A. Photoreceptor sensory cilia and ciliopathies: focus on CEP290, RPGR and their interacting proteins. Cilia. 2012;1(1):22 Epub 2013/01/29. 10.1186/2046-2530-1-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bujakowska KM, Liu Q, Pierce EA. Photoreceptor Cilia and Retinal Ciliopathies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(10). Epub 2017/03/16. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028274 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bachmann-Gagescu R, Neuhauss SC. The photoreceptor cilium and its diseases. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2019;56:22–33. Epub 2019/07/02. 10.1016/j.gde.2019.05.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schmid SL, Sorkin A, Zerial M. Endocytosis: Past, present, and future. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(12):a022509 Epub 2014/11/02. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jovic M, Sharma M, Rahajeng J, Caplan S. The early endosome: a busy sorting station for proteins at the crossroads. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(1):99–112. Epub 2009/11/20. 10.14670/HH-25.99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grant BD, Donaldson JG. Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(9):597–608. Epub 2009/08/22. 10.1038/nrm2755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tooze SA, Abada A, Elazar Z. Endocytosis and autophagy: exploitation or cooperation? Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(5):a018358 Epub 2014/05/03. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wandinger-Ness A, Zerial M. Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(11):a022616 Epub 2014/10/25. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muller MP, Goody RS. Molecular control of Rab activity by GEFs, GAPs and GDI. Small GTPases. 2018;9(1–2):5–21. Epub 2017/01/06. 10.1080/21541248.2016.1276999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(8):513–25. Epub 2009/07/16. 10.1038/nrm2728 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Galvez T, Gilleron J, Zerial M, O'Sullivan GA. SnapShot: Mammalian Rab proteins in endocytic trafficking. Cell. 2012;151(1):234–e2. Epub 2012/10/02. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seixas E, Barros M, Seabra MC, Barral DC. Rab and Arf proteins in genetic diseases. Traffic. 2013;14(8):871–85. Epub 2013/04/10. 10.1111/tra.12072 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.D'Adamo P, Masetti M, Bianchi V, More L, Mignogna ML, Giannandrea M, et al. RAB GTPases and RAB-interacting proteins and their role in the control of cognitive functions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46 Pt 2:302–14. Epub 2014/01/15. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seabra MC, Ho YK, Anant JS. Deficient geranylgeranylation of Ram/Rab27 in choroideremia. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995;270(41):24420–7. Epub 1995/10/13. 10.1074/jbc.270.41.24420 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roosing S, Rohrschneider K, Beryozkin A, Sharon D, Weisschuh N, Staller J, et al. Mutations in RAB28, Encoding a Farnesylated Small GTPase, Are Associated with Autosomal-Recessive Cone-Rod Dystrophy. American journal of human genetics. 2013;93(1):110–7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lumb JH, Leung KF, Dubois KN, Field MC. Rab28 function in trypanosomes: interactions with retromer and ESCRT pathways. Journal of cell science. 2011;124(Pt 22):3771–83. Epub 2011/11/22. 10.1242/jcs.079178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hollyfield JG, Rayborn ME. Endocytosis in the inner segment of rod photoreceptors: analysis of Xenopus laevis retinas using horseradish peroxidase. Experimental eye research. 1987;45(5):703–19. Epub 1987/11/01. 10.1016/s0014-4835(87)80119-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Hook MJ, Thoreson WB. Rapid synaptic vesicle endocytosis in cone photoreceptors of salamander retina. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32(50):18112–23. Epub 2012/12/15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1764-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pinal N, Pichaud F. Dynamin- and Rab5-dependent endocytosis is required to prevent Drosophila photoreceptor degeneration. Journal of cell science. 2011;124(Pt 9):1564–70. Epub 2011/04/14. 10.1242/jcs.082115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoshino A, Ratnapriya R, Brooks MJ, Chaitankar V, Wilken MS, Zhang C, et al. Molecular Anatomy of the Developing Human Retina. Developmental cell. 2017;43:763–79. Epub 2017/12/14. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.029 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brooks MJ, Chen HY, Kelley RA, Mondal AK, Nagashima K, De Val N, et al. Improved Retinal Organoid Differentiation by Modulating Signaling Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analyses with Development In Vivo. Stem cell reports. 2019;13(5):891–905. Epub 2019/10/22. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stenmark H, Vitale G, Ullrich O, Zerial M. Rabaptin-5 is a direct effector of the small GTPase Rab5 in endocytic membrane fusion. Cell. 1995;83(3):423–32. Epub 1995/11/03. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90120-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Horiuchi H, Lippe R, McBride HM, Rubino M, Woodman P, Stenmark H, et al. A novel Rab5 GDP/GTP exchange factor complexed to Rabaptin-5 links nucleotide exchange to effector recruitment and function. Cell. 1997;90(6):1149–59. Epub 1997/10/10. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80380-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Z, Zhang T, Wang S, Gong Z, Tang C, Chen J, et al. Molecular mechanism for Rabex-5 GEF activation by Rabaptin-5. eLife. 2014;3 Epub 2014/06/25. 10.7554/eLife.02687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bucci C, Parton RG, Mather IH, Stunnenberg H, Simons K, Hoflack B, et al. The small GTPase rab5 functions as a regulatory factor in the early endocytic pathway. Cell. 1992;70(5):715–28. Epub 1992/09/04. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90306-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carter-Dawson LD, LaVail MM. Rods and cones in the mouse retina. II. Autoradiographic analysis of cell generation using tritiated thymidine. J Comp Neurol. 1979;188(2):263–72. Epub 1979/11/15. 10.1002/cne.901880205 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim JW, Yang HJ, Brooks MJ, Zelinger L, Karakulah G, Gotoh N, et al. NRL-Regulated Transcriptome Dynamics of Developing Rod Photoreceptors. Cell reports. 2016;17(9):2460–73. Epub 2016/11/24. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tam SY, Tsai M, Snouwaert JN, Kalesnikoff J, Scherrer D, Nakae S, et al. RabGEF1 is a negative regulator of mast cell activation and skin inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(8):844–52. Epub 2004/07/06. 10.1038/ni1093 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Simonsen A, Lippe R, Christoforidis S, Gaullier JM, Brech A, Callaghan J, et al. EEA1 links PI(3)K function to Rab5 regulation of endosome fusion. Nature. 1998;394(6692):494–8. Epub 1998/08/11. 10.1038/28879 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou F, Zou S, Chen Y, Lipatova Z, Sun D, Zhu X, et al. A Rab5 GTPase module is important for autophagosome closure. PLoS genetics. 2017;13(9):e1007020 Epub 2017/09/22. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yamano K, Wang C, Sarraf SA, Munch C, Kikuchi R, Noda NN, et al. Endosomal Rab cycles regulate Parkin-mediated mitophagy. eLife. 2018;7 Epub 2018/01/24. 10.7554/eLife.31326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zeigerer A, Gilleron J, Bogorad RL, Marsico G, Nonaka H, Seifert S, et al. Rab5 is necessary for the biogenesis of the endolysosomal system in vivo. Nature. 2012;485(7399):465–70. Epub 2012/05/25. 10.1038/nature11133 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mattera R, Tsai YC, Weissman AM, Bonifacino JS. The Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rabex-5 binds ubiquitin (Ub) and functions as a Ub ligase through an atypical Ub-interacting motif and a zinc finger domain. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(10):6874–83. Epub 2006/01/13. 10.1074/jbc.M509939200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mattera R, Bonifacino JS. Ubiquitin binding and conjugation regulate the recruitment of Rabex-5 to early endosomes. The EMBO journal. 2008;27(19):2484–94. Epub 2008/09/06. 10.1038/emboj.2008.177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Carney DS, Davies BA, Horazdovsky BF. Vps9 domain-containing proteins: activators of Rab5 GTPases from yeast to neurons. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16(1):27–35. Epub 2005/12/07. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.11.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Marichal T, Gaudenzio N, El Abbas S, Sibilano R, Zurek O, Starkl P, et al. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor RABGEF1 regulates keratinocyte-intrinsic signaling to maintain skin homeostasis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2016;126(12):4497–515. Epub 2016/11/08. 10.1172/JCI86359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sudhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annual review of neuroscience. 2004;27:509–47. Epub 2004/06/26. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131412 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mahapatra KK, Panigrahi DP, Praharaj PP, Bhol CS, Patra S, Mishra SR, et al. Molecular interplay of autophagy and endocytosis in human health and diseases. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2019;94(4):1576–90. Epub 2019/04/17. 10.1111/brv.12515 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Birgisdottir AB, Johansen T. Autophagy and endocytosis—interconnections and interdependencies. Journal of cell science. 2020;133(10). Epub 2020/06/06. 10.1242/jcs.228114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ravikumar B, Imarisio S, Sarkar S, O'Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC. Rab5 modulates aggregation and toxicity of mutant huntingtin through macroautophagy in cell and fly models of Huntington disease. Journal of cell science. 2008;121(Pt 10):1649–60. Epub 2008/04/24. 10.1242/jcs.025726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Heckmann BL, Teubner BJW, Tummers B, Boada-Romero E, Harris L, Yang M, et al. LC3-Associated Endocytosis Facilitates beta-Amyloid Clearance and Mitigates Neurodegeneration in Murine Alzheimer's Disease. Cell. 2019;178(3):536–51 e14. Epub 2019/07/02. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dwivedi M, Sung H, Shen H, Park BJ, Lee S. Disruption of endocytic pathway regulatory genes activates autophagy in C. elegans. Mol Cells. 2011;31(5):477–81. Epub 2011/05/28. 10.1007/s10059-011-1035-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Szatmari Z, Sass M. The autophagic roles of Rab small GTPases and their upstream regulators: a review. Autophagy. 2014;10(7):1154–66. Epub 2014/06/11. 10.4161/auto.29395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8(4):445–544. Epub 2012/09/12. 10.4161/auto.19496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.von Eisenhart-Rothe P, Grubman A, Greferath U, Fothergill LJ, Jobling AI, Phipps JA, et al. Failure of Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathways in Rod Photoreceptors Causes the Early Retinal Degeneration Phenotype Observed in Cln6nclf Mice. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;59(12):5082–97. Epub 2018/10/30. 10.1167/iovs.18-24757 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Campla CK, Mast H, Dong L, Lei J, Halford S, Sekaran S, et al. Targeted deletion of an NRL- and CRX-regulated alternative promoter specifically silences FERM and PDZ domain containing 1 (Frmpd1) in rod photoreceptors. Human molecular genetics. 2019;28(5):804–17. Epub 2018/11/18. 10.1093/hmg/ddy388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stromhaug PE, Berg TO, Fengsrud M, Seglen PO. Purification and characterization of autophagosomes from rat hepatocytes. The Biochemical journal. 1998;335 (Pt 2):217–24. Epub 1998/10/08. 10.1042/bj3350217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stoehr A, Yang Y, Patel S, Evangelista AM, Aponte A, Wang G, et al. Prolyl hydroxylation regulates protein degradation, synthesis, and splicing in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(3):346–58. Epub 2016/04/21. 10.1093/cvr/cvw081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;604:55–71. Epub 2009/12/17. 10.1007/978-1-60761-444-9_5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Roger JE, Hiriyanna A, Gotoh N, Hao H, Cheng DF, Ratnapriya R, et al. OTX2 loss causes rod differentiation defect in CRX-associated congenital blindness. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2014;124(2):631–43. Epub 2014/01/03. 10.1172/JCI72722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Raudvere U, Kolberg L, Kuzmin I, Arak T, Adler P, Peterson H, et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W191–W8. Epub 2019/05/09. 10.1093/nar/gkz369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sergushichev AA, Loboda AA, Jha AK, Vincent EE, Driggers EM, Jones RG, et al. GAM: a web-service for integrated transcriptional and metabolic network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W194–200. Epub 2016/04/22. 10.1093/nar/gkw266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Herwig R, Hardt C, Lienhard M, Kamburov A. Analyzing and interpreting genome data at the network level with ConsensusPathDB. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(10):1889–907. Epub 2016/09/09. 10.1038/nprot.2016.117 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Akimoto M, Cheng H, Zhu D, Brzezinski JA, Khanna R, Filippova E, et al. Targeting of GFP to newborn rods by Nrl promoter and temporal expression profiling of flow-sorted photoreceptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(10):3890–5. Epub 2006/03/01. 0508214103 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0508214103 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Calvo SE, Clauser KR, Mootha VK. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1251–7. Epub 2015/10/10. 10.1093/nar/gkv1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Walker SA, Ktistakis NT. Autophagosome Biogenesis Machinery. Journal of molecular biology. 2020;432(8):2449–61. Epub 2019/11/11. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.027 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory S Barsh, Uwe Wolfrum

8 May 2020

Dear Anand, 

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Loss of endocytosis-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor RABGEF1 causes defects in photoreceptor outer segment biogenesis leading to retinal degeneration' to PLOS Genetics.

Our apologies for the delay in reaching a decision, which was due to difficulty securing reviewers, compounded (as you know) by an unfortunate lapse on the part of PLOS to track important manuscript correspondence. Although the lapse took place in the middle of the pandemic, that is not a sufficient excuse, and we apologize (again) for the delay.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by three external peer reviewers. The reviewers' recommendations are minor revision, reject, and major revision. As you will see, while the reviewers find the work interesting, they express substantial concerns that cast doubt on the strength of the novel conclusions that can be drawn at this stage. Rab5 should be the main target for RABGEF1/Rabex5, but data on rab5 in the retina and especially photoreceptor cells are lacking in the present study. While Rab5 functions are well known for the RPE related to the phagocytosis machinery for Rod outer segments, neither the expression profile nor the function of rab5 the vertebrate neuronal retina or photoreceptor cells has been established. Therefore, it seems questionable whether the available knowledge about the effects of the absence of RABGEF1 really originates from photoreceptor cells, since the OMICs data are from the entire retina. In any case, additional functional data are necessary to enlighten the link between RABGEF1-related defective endosome function and autophagy in the present retinal degeneration model.

Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Uwe Wolfrum

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Comments to the Authors:

Reviewer #1: This authoritatively-written manuscript, presents evidence that depletion of Rabgef1 adversely affects photoreceptor outer segments and leads to retinal degeneration in murine mutants. Analysis of transcriptome data implicated Rabgef1 as a candidate and via experiments that extend from expression analysis, histology, electroretinography and immunohistochemistry, to TEM, IPs, MS etc., the authors demonstrate that Rabgef1 loss induces profound outer retinal phenotypes. Notably, these data are presented in a thoughtful and linear manner. The results are important and are expected to represent the foundation for future studies investigating the role of Rabgef1 in ocular disease.

I was unable to discern any scientific weaknesses to the data presented, and offer the following minor suggestions for textual revisions, that may enhance the publication.

1. Scope exists to enhance the background regarding the roles of Rabs, both by including a diagram/cartoon illustrating the inter-relationship of Rabs, Gefs and Gaps; and by earlier description of paralogs that induce retinal dystrophies. Although Rab27 and 28 are mentioned in the final paragraph of the discussion, more comprehensive review of this gene network would be beneficial for PLoS Genetics’s diverse readership.

2. Although Rabgef1 heterozygous mice likely represent the closest model for human disease, their phenotype is unreported. Inclusion of a description would be of value, unless this would complicate a follow up study focusing on the human genetics of Rabgef1 mutation.

Reviewer #2: Using transcriptomics data, the authors have identified Rabgef1 as the only rab-associated protein that is upregulated during photoreceptor development. Given the importance of Rab function in photoreceptor function, they studied a rabgef1 knockout mouse. They find that rabgef1 knockout mice undergo retinal degeneration, although the mechanism of this retinal degeneration remains unclear. Since rabgef1 is a GEF for rab5, they suggest a mechanism related to a reduction in rab5 activity, which is supported by the reduction in EEA1 punctae that they claim to observe, however they don’t actually present any data on rab5 in their study. Furthermore, the link between the apparent reduction in EEA1 punctae and the interesting observation of LC3-labeled punctae and EM autophagosomes is unclear. The transcriptomic and proteomic data presented in figures 6 and 7 do not help to clarify the story. Overall, the rabgef1 knockout phenotype is interesting and the observation of increase LCA3-labeled punctae is also very interesting, but the story seems to stop at a descriptive and correlative level, and thus feels incomplete.

A general weakness is the use of whole retinal lysate for various experiments to test the specific role of RABGEF1 in photoreceptor development, despite its wide expression pattern in many retinal cell types. The RNA-seq data also stem from total retinal RNA, thus hindering specific relevance to photoreceptors.

Specific points:

Page 7, paragraph 2-It would be useful to have some quantification of the photoreceptor phenotype, possibly an actual measurement of outer segment length.

Page 8, paragraph 2 (Figure 5)-The authors claim there was much less EEA1 immunoreactivity in the KO than in the control. It would be useful for the authors to mention how this quantification was done. If it was performed on a single Z-slice, as is suggested, was the same Z-slice used for both conditions, and how was it chosen? Is it possible that the knockout has EEA1 in a different retinal slice than the wild type? Also it would be useful for the authors to show the full western blot from Figure 5E.

Figure 6-The increase in LC3A/B-labeled punctae in the knockout is striking. Perhaps the authors could show the full western blot from Figure 6C, to confirm the specificity of their antibody?

Page 9, paragraph 2-the authors looked at endosomal vesicular fractions, which they argued should be enriched in autophagosomes, and observed a decrease in phototransduction proteins and mitochondrial homeostasis proteins in their Rabgef1 knockouts relative to the controls. If there were an increase in autophagosomes, wouldn’t you expect the opposite? But then again, does this quantification really mean anything, given the decrease in number of photoreceptors in the knockout? At what age was the quantification performed?

Overall, the proteomic and transcriptomic analysis in Figure 6 and 7 don’t seem to add much to the paper, and don’t really help to explain the phenotype. The most striking result in the study is the increase in LC3A/B labeled punctae in Figure 6. It would be interesting to know, however, whether the objects, claimed to be autophagic structures (Fig. 4), can be labeled with an autophagic marker, such as LC3.

Reviewer #3: On early endosomes, activation of Rab5 is catalyzed by the GEF Rabex5 complexed with the effector Rabaptin5 contributing to early endosome generation and trafficking.

In the current paper, with the title ‚Loss of endocytosis-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor RABGEF1 causes defects in photoreceptor outer segment biogenesis leading to retinal degeneration‘, Hargrove-Grimes et al show, that loss of Rabgef1/Rabex5 in mice resulted in a failure of sufficient early endosome production and endosome trafficking leading to an upregulation of autophagy in the retina and defects of retinal photoreceptor morphology. Using the RABGEF1 KO mouse, the authors show that RABGEF1 is necessary for rod photoreceptor function and maintenance. As cause for progressive degeneration starting after P14, the authors discuss defects in endosome formation leading to an increase in autophagosome formation suggesting autophagy malfunction.

The study suggests an essential role of the endocytic machinery in photoreceptor outer segment biogenesis and function as absence of Rabex5 resulted in an almost complete loss of both rod and cone function early on.

Thes study is shedding light on the importance of the endocytic machinery in delivering cargo for ciliary trafficking of photoreceptors towards outer segment generation. As such I regard it as principally well suited to be published in PLoS Genetics.

There are some criticisms which should be addressed before publication:

A general shortcoming of the study is its focus on rod photoreceptors, disregarding the cones. The manuscript would greatly increase significance, if the cone phenotype would be analyzed after loss of Rabgef1/Rabex5 in mice. Please include data cone opsin trafficking and cone behavior. Is for example cone death a primary event or a consequence of rod death (secondary cone degeneration)

Figure 3 shows the reduction of rhodopsin but there is no data on cone opsins. What is the situation there, given that both a and b wave are greatly reduced?

Figure 1B: A negative control either using a sense probe or the P21 KO would be helpful to distinguish between background and specific staining.

Figure 3B and corresponding text: The blots suggest a delay in protein expression, which does not fit to the discussed ‘decreased recycling of membrane proteins’. In the transcriptome dataset a downregulation of phototransduction genes. How do the authors explain/discuss this early effect of RABGEF1-KO, which happens before photoreceptor-specific RABGEF1 expression is upregulated?

Figure 5C: In P10 samples, more EEA1 staining seems to be in the ONL, which was not quantified. Is there a mis-localization of EEA1-positive endosomes which results in less positive endosomes in the IS? It would be good to highlight the area taken for measurements for Figure 5D. A close-up of the selected area showing single EEA1-positive endosomes is needed to strengthen data shown in 5D. In the Figure legend title there is a typo with RABGEG1 instead of RABGEF1.

Suppl. Table S1 and S2: Please state which stages were used (P21?) in the legend.

Rabex5/RABGEF1 and other components of the endocytic pathway may however, be as essential for overall development of a vertebrate organisms, that they may not show up as potential candidates for diseases that include retinopathy phenotypes.

Suppl. Table S2, Figure 5B and Figure 6D-F and corresponding methods section: How many replicates did you measure? If only one, at least two more biological replicates should be prepared and statistically validated.

Figure 6D-F: How did you perform the isolation of vesicular fractions? This part is missing in the method section.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Gregory S Barsh, Uwe Wolfrum

29 Oct 2020

* Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. *

Dear Anand,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Loss of endocytosis-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in developing photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Uwe Wolfrum

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

The authors have addressed the minor points from reviewer and most of the critical concerns from reviewer 2 and 3 the reviewers. Reviewer 2 accepted to review the revised version and states that most of her/his concerns can been ruled out, now and that the revised manuscript has very much improved. I agree with this and would like to extend this to the criticisms of the 3rd reviewer, who insisted on a major revision, but unfortunately did not re-examine the revised manuscript.

The 3rd reviewer asked for further comments on the cone phenotype in Rabgef1-/- mice. The authors added immunostaining for cone arrestin in a supplement figure, but do not mention or comment the results in the text of the manuscript. I suggest comment the findings on cone staining in a revised version.

I also agree that the new title reflects their findings better. Nevertheless, I suggest shortening of the title.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #2: Comments:

The authors have addressed some of the critical concerns, and the paper is very much improved.

I agree with the main conclusions that 1) Rabgef1KO leads to photoreceptor defects. 2) These defects appear to be related to reduced EEA1+ early endosomes and accumulation of LC3+ autophagosomes.

I have some remaining concerns, with respect to the new Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.

Fig. 6B & C are inconsistent with each other: Fig.6C, western blot, shows barely any difference in LC3A/B – I & II between control and KO animals at P12 and P14; especially if the slight increase for the KO in the tubulin loading control is accounted for. This is inconsistent with the IF result (panel B), which shows absolutely no LC3A/B signal in the control retina in any retinal cell layers, and yet there is a significant signal in the photoreceptor layer of the KO retina, thus indicating a large control v KO difference.

The IF and immunoEM of p62 is striking. But, especially given the inconsistency in A and B, a western blot should be given for p62.

The increase in both LC3 and p62 is difficult to explain, so that the newly added p62 results may be confusing. However, the authors have been careful in their language, suggesting only "altered autophagy", so the result is not overstated.

The transcriptome analysis figure (Fig.7) does not strongly support the autophagy-related conclusions and perhaps should not be left as a main figure.

Fig. 7B: It appears that the strongest changes are at P6, and in functions related to cell-cycle regulation.

Fig. 7C,D,E: Many of the highlighted genes, while suggesting significant differential expression (pValue < 0.05, -Log10 >1.3), are, nevertheless, not changed much, as their LogFC values are mostly below 0.75 (Log2=0.75), which means there is less than a 2-fold change.

Supplemental Fig. S5B is not mentioned anywhere in the manuscript.

Supplemental Fig. S5C two-colored image on the left does not seem to match the single-colored image on the right – there is clear red signal in at least 2-3 places in the image on the left, yet none is seen in the right image.

Supplemental Fig. S8: if I understood it correctly, the y-axis is showing the –log10 calculation of respective pValue for each of the differentially expressed genes, between Ctrl and KO retinas, highlighted in the graph. If that is the case, most of the genes listed here were not actually differentially expressed between the two genotypes: pValue of 0.05 would yield a –log10 value of around 1.3. Therefore, anything below 1.3 would not be considered significantly differentially expressed. Only 4 or 5 genes in the autophagosome-related pathways were differentially expressed at P6 and perhaps only 1 at P10 and none at P14. I don’t think the gene expression data is very convincing here. The perturbation of autophagy in the KO animal could be real, but it is possible that this is more reflected at the protein level rather than the transcriptome level.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Decision Letter 2

Gregory S Barsh, Uwe Wolfrum

9 Nov 2020

Dear Anand,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Uwe 

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Uwe Wolfrum (guest editor): The authors have responded to all the criticisms of reviewer 2 regarding the revision of the manuscript and myself, including the criticism of reviewer 3. I also appreciate that the authors followed my suggestion and shortened the title of the manuscript. From my point of view, there is nothing left to prevent publishing the manuscript in PLOSGenetics.

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-20-00073R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory S Barsh, Uwe Wolfrum

3 Dec 2020

PGENETICS-D-20-00073R2

Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration

Dear Dr Swaroop,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Loss of endocytosis-associated RabGEF1 causes aberrant morphogenesis and altered autophagy in photoreceptors leading to retinal degeneration" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Nicola Davies

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    (A) Total protein loading control (left panel) for RabGEF1 immunoblot shown in Fig 1D, and quantification of total RabGEF1 expression (right panel). (B) Quantification of outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness and inner and outer segment (IS-OS) length from hematoxylin and eosin stained sections.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Immunohistochemistry of control (Ctrl) and Rabgef1-/- (KO) littermate retinas at P10, P12 and P21 using cell type-specific antibody markers.

    Rho (Rhodopsin, a marker of rods), Cone Arr (Cone arrestin, a marker of cones), PKC-α (a marker of ON-bipolar cells), Calbindin (a marker of Horizontal, Amacrine, and some Ganglion cells), GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein, marker of Müller glia stress), and Ribeye (a marker of photoreceptor ribbon synapses). Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI to visualize nuclei. OS, outer segment; IS, inner segment; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. Scale bar = 20 μm.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Raw electroretinogram (ERG) traces from Rabgef1-KO and control animals.

    Representative traces are shown at increasing light intensities for pairs of control and Rabgef1-KO animals. Reduced function is indicated by smaller a-wave (first negative peak) and b-wave (positive peak). The a- and b-wave peaks are labelled in the top left trace for reference.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Additional replicate transmission electron micrographs of Rabgef1-/- photoreceptors from P10 to P22 showing accumulation of amorphous proteolytic aggregates as development proceeds.

    Scale bar = 2 μm.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Characterization of the Rabgef1-/- retina.

    (A) Expression of Rab5 protein in Control (Con) and Rabgef1-KO (KO) animals at P14. (B) Representative EEA1 immunohistochemistry images used for quantification shown in Fig 5C and 5D. (C) Immunohistochemistry of anti-LC3A/B on Rhodopsin T17M mutant 6-week-old littermates. There is no visible accumulation of autophagosomes marked by LC3A/B. Retinal sections were counterstained with DAPI. ONL, outer nuclear layer; INL, inner nuclear layer. Scale bar = 20 μm. (D) TEM-acquired images of Rd1 and Rds mouse models of retinal degeneration.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Altered vesicular cargo composition in enriched fractions of Rabgef1-KO retina.

    (A) Summary of proteins identified from mass spectrometric analysis of vesicle enriched sub-cellular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retina. The Venn diagram also shows how many of the detected proteins are annotated in endocytosis or autophagy pathways. (B) Cargo proteins enriched in control samples, ranked by decreasing order of enrichment (logFC Control/Rabgef1-/-). Proteins of Autophagy, Endocytosis, Mitocarta [64], Synapse and Phototransduction are highlighted in specific colors as described in the legend, or colored black if annotated in multiple categories. Proteins not belonging to the aforementioned groups are colored grey. (C) Enrichment plots for significant under enrichment of Phototransduction and Mitochondrial outer membrane gene sets as observed in gene set enrichment analyses of vesicular cargo from control and Rabgef1-/- retinas.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Dysregulation of oxidative stress response genes in the Rabgef1-KO retina.

    Volcano plots summarize significant differential expression of genes associated with the oxidative stress response pathway at P6, P10, and P14. Each point represents a gene where labelled or colored red and blue denote significant over-expression and under-expression in Rabgef1-KO vs WT comparisons, respectively.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Transcriptional status of autophagy associated genes at different timepoints preceding Rabgef1-/- related degeneration.

    Genes participating in distinct stages of autophagy, namely: Turning on the pathway, Initiation of autophagosome biogenesis, Building the autophagosome, and Fusing autophagosome with lysosome, were obtained from [65], and investigated for their activity in the Rabgef1-KO retina. Volcano plots are arranged in a grid of time versus stage of autophagy, and a point in the volcano plots represents a single gene where colors red and blue denote significant over-expression and under-expression in Rabgef1-KO vs WT comparisons, respectively.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. RNA-expression of Rab family genes in mammalian retina (E11-P28) and isolated flow-sorted photoreceptors (P2-P8).

    Gene-level quantification in counts per million (CPM; average of biological replicates) of Rabs and associated GEFs, GAPs and co-factors in the mouse retina, and flow sorted photoreceptors (FSPR)—rod and S-cone-like. Rabgef1 is highlighted and in bold to indicate its characteristic gene expression pattern during photoreceptor development. Data was extracted from Kim et al. 2016.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Mass spectrometry based proteomic characterization of endosomal vesicular fractions from control and Rabgef1-/- retina (n = 20 pooled P14-P19 retinas per genotype).

    All identified protein species are listed with peptide spectral match (PSM) counts from control and Rabgef1-/- samples. Fold change is calculated by dividing PSM counts from Rabgef1-/- samples to controls.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Resource table listing all antibodies used within the study.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Hargrove-Grimes Response to Reviewers-09042020 Final.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Hargrove-Grimes Plos Genetics Response Revision 11072020.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Raw and processed RNA seq datasets from this study have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession GSE138672. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE138672).


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES