Abstract
Terminalia chebula Retz. (TCR) is a medicinal material commonly used in Mongolian medicine. After consulting the literature at home and abroad, current research on TCR focuses on chemical composition, pharmacodynamics, and fingerprints. The pharmacokinetics of TCR has not been reported. Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) is the main drug-metabolizing enzyme, and its activity may be induced or inhibited by certain drugs, resulting in drug interactions in clinical applications. The objective of this study was to establish a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method that can simultaneously detect multiple probe drugs to determine the effect of TCR on the activities of CYP450 enzymes CYP2C19, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and CYP1A2. Wistar rats (male) were divided into 5 groups according to the randomization principle, namely the control group, the positive group, and the high, medium and low dose group. After 15 days of continuous administration, the mixed probe drug was injected into the vein, and then a small amount of blood was collected from the orbital vein at different time points. After the samples were processed, the blood concentration of each probe drug was measured by the established HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters of each probe drug were calculated using DAS software. Compared with the control group, the plasma clearance (CL) of chlorzoxazone and omeprazole decreased, and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) increased in the TCR group. The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, midazolam, metoprolol, and tolbutamide did not differ significantly. The results indicated that TCR mainly inhibited the activities of CYP2E1 and CYP2C19, but had no effect on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Extra care should be taken when drugs metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 enzymes are used in combination with TCR, as drug-herb interactions may occur. These results can guide the clinical application of related drugs and provide valuable information for drug interactions. The main component that affects enzyme activity may be tannins in the water extract.
Keywords: Terminalia chebula Retz., CYP450, HPLC, cocktail, herb-drug interaction, rat
Introduction
Traditional herbs have been widely used worldwide, and interactions with herbs have been increasingly reported [1]. At present, there are frequent cases of combination of Chinese medicine and Western medicine, and the resulting drug interaction has attracted attention. The pretreatment with Chinese medicine compound Shaoyao Gancao Decoction (SGD) for 2 weeks significantly reduced AUC (area under the curve) and increased CL (plasma clearance) of paclitaxel [2]. In vitro experiments showed that SGD could activate cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and drug transporter multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) promoters and enhance mRNA expression, resulting in accelerated paclitaxel metabolism [3]. Ginkgo biloba combined with warfarin or aspirin may increase bleeding. Combined with thiazide diuretics, it may increase blood pressure, and even cause coma with serotonin antagonists [4]. Studies showed that Ginkgo biloba extract could significantly increase the expressions and activities of CYP2B, CYP3A, and CYP1A [5,6]. Studies showed that the reduction of the blood concentration of cyclosporine induced by St. John’s wort brought about organ rejection, which revealed that St. John’s wort could induce the activities of CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein [7]. Many studies have shown that Chinese herbal medicines can affect the metabolism associated with the drug by changing the activity of drug metabolism enzymes, which is very risky [1,8]. Therefore, it is necessary to study the influence of traditional Chinese medicine on CYP450 enzymes to better guide its clinical application.
Terminalia chebula Retz. (TCR), its ripe fruit used as medicine, is native to India and Myanmar, and distributed in Tibet, Yunnan, Guangdong, and Guangxi [9]. The characteristics and taste of TCR are based on traditional Chinese medicine theory. TCR mainly treats long-term diarrhea and dysentery, blood in the stool and prolapse of the anus, lung deficiency and cough, persistent coughing, sore throat and hoarseness [10]. It contains chemical compounds such as steroids, polyphenols, polysaccharides, and volatile oils [11]. TCR has the largest application ratio and the most extensive function in Mongolian medicine, and has the reputation of being the “king of medicine” in Mongolian herbs [12]. TCR is astringent in Mongolian medicine. It has the effects of regulating qi and supplementing qi, digestion and detoxification, and treatment of poisoning and other diseases [13]. Modern pharmacological studies have shown that TCR extracts have a wide range of functions, including antibacterial, antioxidant, hypoglycemic, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and killing or inhibiting malignant tumor cells. TCR can also be used to relieve the toxicity of aconite [9,14]. After consulting the literature at home and abroad, the research on Mongolian medicine TCR mainly focuses on the chemical composition, pharmacodynamics, and fingerprint. However, no research has been reported on the pharmacokinetics of TCR, so this project intends to study the effect of TCR on CYP450 enzyme activity in rats, which has practical guiding significance for clinical use.
Cytochrome P450s (CYP450s) are the most important Phase I metabolic enzymes. They are able to metabolize many endogenous substances as well as many exogenous substances and they participate in drug interaction [15]. CYP450 activity can be induced or inhibited by exogenous substances, which can change the effectiveness and safety of other drugs, causing severe clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) [8,16]. The main regulator of herbal-drug interaction (HDI) is thought to be the inhibition or induction of specific enzymes, and this effect will occur when herbs and western medicine are administered in combination [17,18]. Therefore, in order to infer potential HDI, it is important to understand whether herbs can inhibit and induce the activity of CYP450 enzymes. Six important CYP isoenzymes (CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, and CYP2D6) were selected in this study because they metabolize many drugs and are major contributors to most known drug metabolism [19]. Studies show that CYPs (1a2, 2c11, 2e1, 2d1, 3a1/2, and 2d2) of rats are homologous to CYPs (1A2, 2C9, 2E1, 2C19, 3A4, and 2D6) of humans [20,21]. Therefore, the results in rats can be inferred to have clinical application in humans.
In order to evaluate the safety of TCR in clinical application, theophylline, chlorzoxazone, tolbutamide, omeprazole, metoprolol and midazolam were selected as CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 specific probe substrates. In this experiment, the effects of TCR on the activities of six CYP450 isoforms in rats were investigated using a probe-drug method combined with HPLC.
Materials and methods
Drug and standard substances
Terminalia chebula Retz. (TCR) was purchased from the Chinese and Mongolian Medical Hospital of Baotou, Inner Mongolia. Theophylline, metoprolol, omeprazole, midazolam, chlorzoxazone, tolbutamide, and tinidazole (all >98%) were obtained from Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Dalian, China).
Animals
Male Wistar rats (200±20 g) were provided by Beijing Si Beifu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. All rats lived in the Cardiovascular Research Laboratory of Baotou Medical College. First they were acclimated for one week, and then the experiment was started. The room temperature was 22°C, and the light and dark were alternated. All experimental procedures were ethically approved by the Experimental Animal Management Committee of Baotou Medical College.
Instrumentation and conditions
In order to analyze mixed probe drugs, this experiment used Ultimate 3000 HPLC, which is equipped with a diode array detector. Tinidazole (the internal standard, IS), theophylline, metoprolol, omeprazole, midazolam, chlorzoxazone, and tolbutamide were separated using Eclipse XDB-C18 (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm, Agilent, USA). The column temperature was 35°C. The mobile phase was acetonitrile (A) and an aqueous solution containing 0.1% phosphoric acid (B), the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the injection volume was 10 µL. The gradient elution procedure is as follows: 0-14 min (12%-31% A); 14-15 min (31%-38% A); 15-17 min (38%-43% A); 17-18 min (43%-50% A); 18-20 min (50%-53% A); 20-25 min (53% A).
Preparation of standard solutions
Theophylline, metoprolol, omeprazole, midazolam, chlorzoxazone, tolbutamide and IS were dissolved in methanol to prepare 0.1485, 0.047, 0.057, 0.03, 0.057, 0.152, and 0.0416 mg/mL of stock solution. The stock solution was serially diluted with methanol to prepare a working solution for each analyte. All solutions were stored at 4°C and allowed to return to room temperature before use. In order to quantify the blood concentrations of the six probe drugs, a standard curve was established for each drug. Concentrations of each probe drug were diluted 4, 10, 20, 40, 100, 200, 1000, and 2000 times.
Pharmacokinetic study
Wistar rats (male, 200±20 g) were used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Forty Wistar male rats were divided into 5 groups according to the randomization principle, the control group, the positive group, the TCR high-dose group, the middle-dose group, and the low-dose group (n = 8). Continuous intragastric administration was provided for 15 days. After 15 days, a cocktail solution containing six probe drugs was injected through the tail vein: theophylline (10 mg/kg), metoprolol (10 mg/kg), omeprazole (10 mg/kg), chlorzoxazone (5 mg/kg), tolbutamide (2.5 mg/kg), and midazolam (5 mg/kg).
After the injection of the mixed probe drug solution, 0.5 ml of blood samples were obtained from eyes at 0.083, 0.167, 0.333, 0.667, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Each sample was centrifuged at 3500 r/min for 10 min, and 200 µL plasma was obtained from the sample.
HPLC was used to detect drugs extracted from plasma samples. To 200 µL of plasma sample, was added 100 µL IS working solution (0.0416 mg/mL) and 2 mL of dichloromethane. After vortexing for 5 minutes, the samples were centrifuged at 3500 r/min for 10 minutes. Then, we carefully transferred 1.2 mL of the organic phase to another glass tube and blowed it dry with nitrogen. The dried material was re-dissolved in 200 µL of methanol and analyzed by HPLC.
Preparation and content determination of TCR
The common method of TCR administration is oral water decoction, so this experiment used distilled water to decoct TCR powder, and then detected the tannin content and gallic acid content in the extract according to the method in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Part Four) [22].
Statistical analysis
Pharmacokinetic parameters of each probe drug were calculated using DAS software (version 3.0), such as T1/2, CL, AUC and Cmax. The SPSS 17.0 statistical software was used to analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters of each probe drug. Analysis of variance was used to compare between groups. P<0.05 was considered to be a significant difference. All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Results
Method validation
HPLC chromatograms and retention times of six probe drugs
HPLC chromatograms of probe drugs are shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1, the retention times were 4.978 min (theophylline), 8.988 min (IS), 10.588 min (metoprolol), 11.208 min (omeprazole), 16.770 min (midazolam), 19.230 min (chlorzoxazone), 22.663 min (tolbutamide). These samples had good separation effect.
Figure 1.

HPLC chromatograms: A. Blank plasma; B. Blank plasma spiked with the cocktail probe drugs and the IS; C. Plasma sample obtained from a rat after intravenous injection of the cocktail probe drugs spiked with the IS; 1. theophylline; 2. IS; 3. metoprolol; 4. omeprazole; 5. midazolam; 6. chlorzoxazone; 7. tolbutamide.
Calibration curve
Table 1 shows the regression types, correlation coefficients, and calibration values for each analyte over a range. The calibration curve shows good linearity and good correlation coefficients at selected concentrations in all analyte samples.
Table 1.
Regression equation and correlation coefficient for six probe drugs
| Probe drugs | Regression equation | Correlation coefficient | Linear range (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theophylline | y = 0.0342x - 0.0021 | 0.9996 | 0.07~37.13 μg/mL |
| Metoprolol | y = 0.0324x + 0.0066 | 0.9998 | 0.02~11.8 μg/mL |
| Omeprazole | y = 0.0297x + 0.0092 | 0.9982 | 0.02~14.3 μg/mL |
| Midazolam | y = 0.2168x + 0.0259 | 0.9998 | 0.01~7. 5 μg/mL |
| Chlorzoxazone | y = 0.0806x + 0.0603 | 0.9994 | 0.02~14.3 μg/mL |
| Tolbutamide | y = 0.0531x + 0.0581 | 0.9949 | 0.07~38.0 μg/mL |
y = peak area ratio of probe drugs vs IS; x = concentration of probe drugs.
Precision and extraction efficiency
The precision of intraday and interday samples were measured to be 7.51% and 7.96% or less at each level, respectively. The value of mean extraction efficiency was measured to be in the range of 86.59-104.58%. Assay performance data are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Precision and extraction efficiency of six probe drugs in rat plasma (n = 5)
| Compound | Concentration (µg/mL) | Intraday precision | interday precision | Extraction efficiency | RSD% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
| x±s | RSD% | x±s | RSD% | ||||
| Theophylline | 37.13 | 36.95±0.48 | 1.29 | 37.17±0.05 | 1.41 | 100.67±2.14 | 2.13 |
| 1.49 | 1.49±0.04 | 2.43 | 1.49±0.04 | 2.43 | 100.50±2.44 | 2.43 | |
| 0.74 | 0.72±0.03 | 3.88 | 0.72±0.03 | 3.88 | 96.46±3.74 | 3.88 | |
| 0.07 | 0.08±0.00 | 3.54 | 0.08±0.00 | 3.54 | 104.58±3.70 | 3.54 | |
| Metoprolol | 11.75 | 11.75±0.09 | 0.74 | 11.76±0.08 | 0.70 | 101.63±2.97 | 2.92 |
| 1.18 | 1.15±0.01 | 0.85 | 1.16±0.00 | 0.64 | 98.05±2.37 | 2.42 | |
| 0.24 | 0.23±0.01 | 6.32 | 0.23±0.01 | 5.11 | 97.48±4.98 | 5.11 | |
| 0.02 | 0.02±0.00 | 4.09 | 0.02±0.00 | 7.96 | 99.62±7.93 | 7.96 | |
| Omeprazole | 14.25 | 14.22±0.07 | 0.52 | 14.32±0.22 | 1.53 | 100.47±1.54 | 1.53 |
| 1.43 | 1.39±0.06 | 4.37 | 1.46±0.04 | 2.41 | 102.22±2.46 | 2.41 | |
| 0.29 | 0.28±0.01 | 4.72 | 0.28±0.01 | 4.72 | 99.11±4.68 | 4.72 | |
| 0.03 | 0.03±0.00 | 4.69 | 0.03±0.00 | 7.14 | 92.85±6.63 | 7.14 | |
| Midazolam | 7.5 | 7.45±0.11 | 1.52 | 7.52±0.05 | 0.61 | 100.56±1.01 | 1.01 |
| 1.5 | 1.49±0.01 | 0.69 | 1.56±0.01 | 0.42 | 103.24±1.96 | 1.90 | |
| 0.75 | 0.72±0.01 | 0.91 | 0.72±0.01 | 0.95 | 97.21±3.34 | 3.43 | |
| 0.02 | 0.01±0.00 | 7.51 | 0.01±0.00 | 7.51 | 94.11±7.07 | 7.51 | |
| Chlorzoxazone | 14.25 | 14.23±0.05 | 0.32 | 14.35±0.05 | 0.33 | 100.51±1.24 | 1.23 |
| 1.43 | 1.36±0.02 | 1.26 | 1.39±0.05 | 3.38 | 97.23±3.29 | 3.38 | |
| 0.29 | 0.28±0.01 | 1.90 | 0.28±0.00 | 1.53 | 99.40±1.52 | 1.53 | |
| 0.03 | 0.03±0.00 | 7.13 | 0.03±0.00 | 7.14 | 88.25±6.30 | 7.14 | |
| Tolbutamide | 38 | 37.49±0.17 | 0.44 | 37.81±0.11 | 0.29 | 101.12±2.16 | 2.14 |
| 3.8 | 3.78±0.06 | 1.60 | 3.80±0.08 | 1.86 | 99.89±1.86 | 1.86 | |
| 0.76 | 0.75±0.02 | 2.10 | 0.76±0.02 | 3.01 | 100.29±3.02 | 3.01 | |
| 0.08 | 0.07±0.00 | 5.43 | 0.08±0.00 | 2.35 | 100.81±2.37 | 2.35 | |
Stability
The plasma samples were placed at room temperature and frozen for 1 week and 3 weeks for stability studies. The results showed that the relative errors of these probe drugs in plasma were <10%, indicating that the plasma sample was stable.
Effects of TCR on CYP450 activity in rats
The probe substrate concentrations in blood samples at different time points were measured by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, metoprolol, omeprazole, midazolam, chlorzoxazone and tolbutamide were calculated by using DAS software. According to the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters, the effects of TCR on the activities of six CYP450 enzymes were assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters included T1/2, Cmax, AUC(0~t), AUC(0~∞), and CL. The pharmacokinetic parameters and mean plasma concentration time curves of the six probe drugs are shown in Table 3 and Figure 2.
Table 3.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of six probe drugs (mean ± SD, n = 8)
| Probe drug | Group | AUC(0~t)/ug·mL-1·h | AUC(0~∞)/ug·mL-1·h | T1/2/h | Cmax/ug·mL-1 | Cl/L·h-1·Kg-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theophylline | Control | 196.77±39.11 | 222.98±32.56 | 8.26±2.18 | 28.32±4.31 | 0.05±0.01 |
| Positive | 159.22±22.94 | 209.08±80.39 | 5.72±2.04 | 28.55±5.50 | 0.05±0.01 | |
| High | 199.47±44.61 | 231.12±34.53 | 9.79±2.15 | 30.92±3.29 | 0.04±0.01 | |
| Medium | 197.40±36.91 | 200.37±38.76 | 7.05±3.06 | 27.29±1.64 | 0.05±0.01 | |
| Low | 195.61±58.30 | 211.81±48.64 | 7.83±3.64 | 25.96±4.34 | 0.05±0.01 | |
| Metoprolol | Control | 2.36±0.62 | 2.50±0.69 | 0.57±0.09 | 2.31±0.31 | 4.21±0.91 |
| Positive | 2.39±0.31 | 2.50±0.27 | 0.50±0.15 | 2.75±0.63 | 4.04±0.45 | |
| High | 2.88±0.51 | 2.98±0.52 | 0.49±0.09 | 3.35±0.80** | 3.45±0.60 | |
| Medium | 2.73±0.30 | 3.00±0.52 | 0.68±0.26 | 2.71±0.42 | 3.42±0.52 | |
| Low | 2.16±0.75 | 2.27±0.75 | 0.52±0.16 | 2.43±0.58 | 4.92±1.82 | |
| Omeprazole | Control | 2.37±0.91 | 2.60±0.88 | 0.22±0.08 | 7.18±2.05 | 4.60±1.68 |
| Positive | 2.27±0.58 | 2.44±0.57 | 0.19±0.04 | 7.17±2.01 | 4.28±0.78 | |
| High | 3.85±1.08* | 4.06±1.11* | 0.22±0.12 | 11.12±3.58* | 2.63±0.70* | |
| Medium | 3.26±0.98 | 3.46±0.90 | 0.21±0.05 | 9.72±2.71 | 3.01±0.59* | |
| Low | 2.36±0.71 | 2.59±0.78 | 0.17±0.04 | 7.42±2.20 | 4.31±1.77 | |
| Midazolam | Control | 2.26±0.65 | 2.28±0.65 | 0.36±0.07 | 2.41±0.37 | 2.32±0.53 |
| Positive | 1.70±0.37 | 1.77±0.36 | 0.37±0.09 | 2.32±0.56 | 2.93±0.58 | |
| High | 2.51±0.54 | 2.66±0.46 | 0.32±0.05 | 3.23±0.69* | 1.93±0.33 | |
| Medium | 2.34±0.50 | 2.38±0.51 | 0.40±0.08 | 2.72±0.60 | 2.18±0.42 | |
| Low | 2.45±0.64 | 2.48±0.64 | 0.39±0.05 | 2.57±0.59 | 2.14±0.56 | |
| Chlorzoxazone | Control | 17.84±4.42 | 20.80±4.33 | 1.06±0.27 | 12.29±3.21 | 0.26±0.05 |
| Positive | 15.69±2.82 | 16.41±2.75 | 0.66±0.27 | 13.67±1.86 | 0.31±0.05 | |
| High | 21.24±5.74 | 26.90±5.08* | 1.16±0.77 | 16.21±3.66* | 0.19±0.04* | |
| Medium | 20.50±4.63 | 22.50±4.91 | 1.05±0.35 | 15.15±3.52* | 0.23±0.05 | |
| Low | 18.24±4.88 | 19.73±5.46 | 0.95±0.26 | 12.61±2.46 | 0.27±0.08 | |
| Tolbutamide | Control | 405.52±95.47 | 459.59±124.09 | 13.32±4.31 | 38.92±8.85 | 0.006±0.002 |
| Positive | 141.53±35.85 | 167.24±51.39 | 6.91±3.13 | 44.03±11.04 | 0.017±0.006 | |
| High | 406.23±69.92 | 560.42±138.27 | 15.17±5.05 | 49.70±9.90 | 0.004±0.001 | |
| Medium | 431.05±77.86 | 521.37±190.74 | 11.34±2.35 | 42.30±6.45 | 0.005±0.001 | |
| Low | 454.91±111.05 | 495.22±140.86 | 12.57±4.56 | 39.83±6.28 | 0.006±0.002 |
Comparing medication groups with the control group;
P<0.05;
P<0.01.
(T1/2, half-life; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; AUC, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve; CL, plasma clearance).
Figure 2.

Mean plasma concentration-time curves for theophylline, tolbutamide, metoprolol, chlorzoxazone, omeprazole, and midazolam.
Effect of TCR on CYP1A2 activity in rats
The activity of CYP1A2 is described by the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline. No significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters was found between the TCR group and the control group (P>0.05), which indicates that TCR has no effect on CYP1A2 activity in vivo.
Effect of TCR on CYP2D6 activity in rats
CYP2D6 activity was evaluated with metoprolol’s pharmacokinetic parameters in different groups. The high and medium dose groups of TCR tended to increase AUC(0~t) and AUC(0~∞), decrease CL, but these pharmacokinetic parameters had no significant differences with the control group (p>0.05). Compared with the control group, the Cmax of the high-dose group was significantly increased (P<0.01). These data indicate that TCR may not affect the activity of CYP2D6.
Effect of TCR on CYP2C19 activity in rats
The pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole in different dose groups were used to evaluate the activity of CYP2C19. The high dose group of TCR significantly increased Cmax, AUC(0~t), and AUC(0~∞), and decreased CL (P<0.05). The medium dose group also significantly decreased CL (P<0.05). These data indicated that TCR could inhibit the activity of CYP2C19.
Effect of TCR on CYP3A4 activity in rats
Midazolam’s Pharmacokinetic parameters were used to describe CYP3A4 activity. The high dose group of TCR significantly increased Cmax (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in AUC, T1/2, and CL between the TCR group and the control group (P>0.05). These results indicated TCR might have no influence on the activity of CYP3A4.
Effect of TCR on CYP2E1 activity in rats
The pharmacokinetic parameters of chlorzoxazone were used to analyze the activity of CYP2E1. Compared with the control group, Cmax, AUC(0~t), and AUC(0~∞) of the TCR high-dose group were significantly increased, and CL decreased significantly (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, medium dose group had significantly increased Cmax (P<0.05) but AUC(0~t), AUC(0~∞) increased and CL decreased, with no significant differences. These data indicated that TCR might inhibit the activity of CYP2E1.
Effect of TCR on CYP2C9 activity in rats
The activity of CYP2C9 was depicted by pharmacokinetic parameters of tolbutamide in different dose groups. There were no significant differences in the various pharmacokinetic parameters between the TCR group and the control group. These data indicated that CYP2C9 activity might not be influenced.
Preparation and content determination of TCR
According to the literature method, the tannin content in TCR extract was 23.2%, and the gallic acid content was 1.67%.
Discussion
The use of herbal medicines as an important component of multi-component therapy has increased steadily over the past decade. Eighty percent of the population in Asian countries use herbs to promote health and treat common diseases, such as inflammation, pain, heart disease, cirrhosis, and central nervous system disease. However, as the use of herbal medicines increased, so did the risk for herb and drug interactions [23]. Herb-drug interactions include pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions. In pharmacokinetic interactions, approximately 65% of drug interactions occur at metabolic sites. Drug-metabolizing enzymes are considered to be the most important interaction sites [24]. Increasing evidence demonstrated that the activity of CYP450 enzymes (including induction and inhibition) was one of the risk factors for drug combination in a patient’s life. As a result, the number of pharmacokinetics studies on safe drug treatments is increasing [25].
Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) is an important metabolic enzyme and is involved in most drug metabolism [26]. Drugs are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. CYP450 is the major enzyme in drug metabolism. It is a superfamily gene, and includes CYP1, CYP2, CYP3 gene family, their subtypes, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 are the main enzymes in drug metabolism [27,28].
CYP2C19 is a clinically important enzyme and is considered to be a major contributor in the formation of active metabolites [29]. It plays a vital role in the metabolism of many therapeutic agents which include proton pump inhibitors (such as pantoprazole and omeprazole), antiepileptic agents, antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel), antidepressants (citalopram), and antifungal agents (voriconazole) [30,31]. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, the medication group had a significant influence on omeprazole’s pharmacokinetic parameters. Compared with the control group, the AUC(0~t), AUC(0~∞), Cmax increased, and the CL decreased (P<0.05) in the medication group. These results indicated that TCR may inhibit the activity of CYP2C19. Herb-drug interactions may occur if TCR is combined with drugs metabolized by CYP2C19, for example, if it is used in combination with clopidogrel. It is unclear whether TCR will increase the adverse effects of clopidogrel (such as bleeding) due to the slower metabolism of clopidogrel in the body and an increase in blood plasma concentration. In clinical applications, if adverse reactions increase, this can be avoided by adjusting the dosing schedule.
The expression of CYP2E1 in the liver is higher than in other organs [32]. Some endogenous substrates are metabolized by CYP2E1, especially acetone and fatty acids (they are rich in the brain). CYP2E1 is also involved in the metabolism of many exogenous compounds, which include acetaminophen, aspartame, anesthetics, oxazolone, nicotine, acetone, phenobarbital, tetrachloride ethanol, and chloroform [33,34]. According to Table 3 and Figure 2, compared with the control group, the AUC, Cmax increased, and CL decreased in the high-dose group (P<0.05). The result indicated that TCR can inhibit the activity of the CYP2E1 enzyme and thereby slow down the metabolism of chlorzoxazone. When drugs metabolized by CYP2E1 are used in combination with TCR, TCR will also slow down the metabolism of these drugs and lead to excessive drug concentrations in vivo, which will cause adverse reactions and even toxic effects. Hence, TCR should be carefully used in clinical practice if it is combined with drugs metabolized by CYP2E1 enzymes. If combined use is needed, the dosing regimen should be adjusted to avoid adverse effects from high concentrations.
CYP1A2 is a very important enzyme in the CYP1A subfamily [35]. It is involved in the metabolism of some xenobiotics in the body and it also plays an important role in the synthesis of cholesterol, steroids, and other lipids [36]. For example, some analgesics and antipyretics, antipsychotics, and cardiovascular drugs require CYP1A2 for metabolism [32,37]. CYP2C9 accounts for about 20% of the total liver CYP content [38]. It can metabolize over 15% of clinically administrated drugs (>100 drugs) and several endogenous compounds [39]. CYP2D6 participates in approximately 15-20% the metabolism of all drugs which include β-blockers, antipsychotics, most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and antitumor agents [40,41]. CYP3A4 can metabolize 40%-50% of drugs in clinical use, such as lipid-lowering statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin and lovastatin), calcium channel blockers, anticoagulant factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and macrolide antibiotics [42]. According to Table 3 and Figure 2, the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, tolbutamide, metoprolol, and midazolam were not significantly different between the control group and the TCR dose group (P>0.05). These results showed TCR did not influence the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. That is to say, the combination of TCR with drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 enzymes may not cause herbal-drug interactions. Therefore, drugs metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9 enzymes are safe to use in combination with TCR.
The chemical composition of TCR is rich and diverse, including phenolic acids, tannins, triterpenoids, aliphatics, flavonoids, volatile oils, amino acids, trace elements, carbohydrates, and so on. Tannins are the main active components of TCR, accounting for about 23.60% to 37.36%, and are the main source of polyphenols [43]. Studies have shown that the content of active ingredients such as gallic acid, chebulinic acid, chebulagic acid, ellagic acid, and 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid are higher in TCR, among which gallic acid is the highest. These ingredients can be absorbed into the blood [44]. In this experiment, the tannin content in the water decoction of TCR was 23.2% and gallic acid content was 1.67%. Many traditional medicines work because of a group of ingredients. It is speculated that tannin may be the main component group affecting enzyme activity.
Conclusion
In this study, the HPLC method was developed to simultaneously measure the concentration of six probe drugs in rat plasma to evaluate the effect of TCR on the activity of six CYP450 isoforms. The results indicated that TCR may inhibit the activities of CYP2C19 and CYP2E1, and had no effect on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9. When drugs metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 enzymes are used in combination with TCR, extra care should be taken as herb -drug interactions may occur. These results can guide the clinical application of related drugs and provide valuable information for drug interactions. The main component that affects enzyme activity may be tannins in the water extract.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Autonomous region-level university student innovation and entrepreneurship training program project (201910127003), the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation (2017MS(LH)0808), and the Inner Mongolia autonomous region university scientific research project (NJZY19193).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Yim D, Kim MJ, Shin Y, Lee SJ, Shin JG, Kim DH. Inhibition of cytochrome P450 activities by sophora flavescens extract and its prenylated flavonoids in human liver microsomes. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2019:2673769. doi: 10.1155/2019/2673769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Y, Huang X, Zhong MZ, Lu RH, Xia ZA, Fan R, Liu B, Huang W, Gan PP. Pretreatment of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction () alters pharmacokinetics of intravenous paclitaxel in rats. Chin J Integr Med. 2017;23:70–75. doi: 10.1007/s11655-016-2619-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feng D, Tang T, Fan R, Luo J, Cui H, Wang Y, Gan P. Gancao (Glycyrrhizae Radix) provides the main contribution to Shaoyao-Gancao decoction on enhancements of CYP3A4 and MDR1 expression via pregnane X receptor pathway in vitro. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:345. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2402-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen XW, Serag ES, Sneed KB, Liang J, Chew H, Pan SY, Zhou SF. Clinical herbal interactions with conventional drugs: from molecules to maladies. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18:4836–4850. doi: 10.2174/092986711797535317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li L, Stanton JD, Tolson AH, Luo Y, Wang H. Bioactive terpenoids and flavonoids from Ginkgo biloba extract induce the expression of hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes through pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated pathways. Pharm Res. 2009;26:872–882. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9788-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Robertson SM, Davey RT, Voell J, Formentini E, Alfaro RM, Penzak SR. Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract on lopinavir, midazolam and fexofenadine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:591–599. doi: 10.1185/030079908x260871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou S, Chan E, Pan SQ, Huang M, Lee EJ. Pharmacokinetic interactions of drugs with St John’s wort. J Psychopharmacol. 2004;18:262–276. doi: 10.1177/0269881104042632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li G, Huang K, Nikolic D, van Breemen RB. High-throughput cytochrome P450 cocktail inhibition assay for assessing drug-drug and drug-botanical interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43:1670–1678. doi: 10.1124/dmd.115.065987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li B, Li X, Fan Y. Research progess on pharmacological action of Terminalia chebula Retz. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2015;34:591–595. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu XH. “King of Medicine”-Terminalia chebula Retz. Forestry of Guangxi. 2015;3:22–23. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang JL, Wang PJ, Yi ZW. Research progress on chemical constituents, pharmacological effects and processing compatibility of Terminalia chebula Retz. Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2016;33:123–126. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang D, Wu GD, Gao HB, Xu JH. Effects of extracts of terminalia chebula on animal gastrointestinal activity and serum levels of motilin. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae. 2013;19:243–246. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bao JY. The king of Mongolian medicine-terminalia chebula Retz. Medical Anthology. 1991;4:58–59. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang XJ, He LJ, Lu Q, Li DY. Pharmacological activity of Terminalia chebula. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 2016;41:4. doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20160412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Varma MV, Lai Y, Kimoto E, Goosen TC, El-Kattan AF, Kumar V. Mechanistic modeling to predict the transporter- and enzyme-mediated drug-drug interactions of repaglinide. Pharm Res. 2013;30:1188–1199. doi: 10.1007/s11095-012-0956-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jin C, Wu Z, Wang L, Kanai Y, He X. CYP450s-activity relations of celastrol to interact with triptolide reveal the reasons of hepatotoxicity of tripterygium wilfordii. Molecules. 2019;24:2162. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang D, Wu GD, Zhang YD, Xu JP, Zhen HT, Li MH. Effects of Digeda-4 Decoction on the CYP450 activities in rats using a cocktail method by HPLC. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1415082. doi: 10.1155/2018/1415082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cheng C, Qian J, Wang Z, Li W, Huang C, Chen M, Dong Y, Lian L, Sun W. Influences of Corydalis decumbens on the activities of CYP450 enzymes in rats with a cocktail approach. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9614781. doi: 10.1155/2019/9614781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rendic S, Guengerich FP. Survey of human oxidoreductases and cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic and natural chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:38–42. doi: 10.1021/tx500444e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Videau O, Pitarque S, Troncale S, Hery P, Thévenot E, Delaforge M, Bénech H. Can a cocktail designed for phenotyping pharmacokinetics and metabolism enzymes in human be used efficiently in rat? Xenobiotica. 2012;42:349–354. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2011.625453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ma YL, Zhao F, Yin JT, Liang CJ, Niu XL, Qiu ZH, Zhang LT. Two approaches for evaluating the effects of galangin on the activities and mRNA expression of seven CYP450. Molecules. 2019;24:1171. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Commission NP. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (Four Sections) Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Choi YH, Chin YW, Kim YG. Herb-drug interactions: focus on metabolic enzymes and transporters. Arch Pharm Res. 2011;34:1843–1863. doi: 10.1007/s12272-011-1106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ding Y, Xu D, Zhang X, Yang H, Geng T, He P, Yao J, Yi S, Xu H, Wu D, Wang X, Jin T. Genetic polymorphisms and phenotypic analysis of drug-metabolizing enzyme CYP2C19 in a Li Chinese population. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:13201–13208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Al-Ramahi R, Jaradat N, Shalalfeh R, Nasir S, Manasra Y, Shalalfeh I, Esam Y. Evaluation of potential drug- herb interactions among a group of Palestinian patients with chronic diseases. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:221. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0764-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ouyang H, Shen J, Huang X, Ma W, Jia Q, Yao G, Tang Z, Zhang D, Sun M, Teye Azietaku J, Hao J, Gao X, Chang Y, He J. Effect of naoxintong capsules on the Activities of CYP450 and metabolism of metoprolol tartrate in rats evaluated by probe cocktail and pharmacokinetic methods. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2019:5242605. doi: 10.1155/2019/5242605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ung YT, Ong CE, Pan Y. Current high-throughput approaches of screening modulatory effects of xenobiotics on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. High Throughput. 2018;7:ht7040029. doi: 10.3390/ht7040029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jin SE, Ha H, Seo CS, Shin HK, Jeong SJ. Expression of hepatic cytochrome P450s in rats administered with Guibi-tang, a traditional herbal formula. Pharmacogn Mag. 2018;13:S822–S827. doi: 10.4103/pm.pm_107_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boulenc X, Djebli N, Shi J, Perrin L, Brian W, Van Horn R, Hurbin F. Effects of omeprazole and genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 on the clopidogrel active metabolite. Drug Metab Dispos. 2012;40:187–197. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.040394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Holmes MV, Perel P, Shah T, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. CYP2C19 genotype, clopidogrel metabolism, platelet function, and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306:2704–2714. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shirasaka Y, Chaudhry AS, McDonald M, Prasad B, Wong T, Calamia JC, Fohner A, Thornton TA, Isoherranen N, Unadkat JD, Rettie AE, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Interindividual variability of CYP2C19-catalyzed drug metabolism due to differences in gene diplotypes and cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase content. Pharmacogenomics J. 2016;16:375–387. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2015.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Garcia-Suastegui WA, Ramos-Chavez LA, Rubio-Osornio M, Calvillo-Velasco M, Atzin-Mendez JA, Guevara J, Silva-Adaya D. The role of CYP2E1 in the drug metabolism or bioactivation in the brain. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:4680732. doi: 10.1155/2017/4680732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hartman JH, Letzig LG, Roberts DW, James LP, Fifer EK, Miller GP. Cooperativity in CYP2E1 metabolism of acetaminophen and styrene mixtures. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;97:341–349. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jiang Z, Jiang X, Li C, Xue H, Zhang X. Development of an IgY Antibody-based immunoassay for the screening of the cyP2E1 inhibitor/enhancer from herbal medicines. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:502. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jiang Z, Gu L, Liang X, Cao B, Zhang J, Guo X. The effect of selenium on CYP450 isoform activity and expression in pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020;196:454–462. doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-01945-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Ahmad MM, Amir N, Dhanasekaran S, John A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Ali BR, Bastaki SMA. Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450-1A2 (CYP1A2) among Emiratis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138:103–141. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lin Y, Wei Y, Hu X, Wu M, Yao J, Ying X, Fu X, Ding M, Qiao L. Evaluation of lentinan effects on cytochrome P450 activity in rats by a cocktail method. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22:296–301. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.31611.7611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Louet M, Labbé CM, Fagnen C, Aono CM, Homem-de-Mello P, Villoutreix BO, Miteva MA. Insights into molecular mechanisms of drug metabolism dysfunction of human CYP2C9*30. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Opdam FL, Modak AS, Mooijaart SP, Louwerens M, de Waal MW, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ. CYP2D6 metabolism in frail elderly compared to non-frail elderly: a pilot feasibility study. Drugs Aging. 2015;32:1019–1027. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0319-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pan X, Ning M, Jeong H. Transcriptional regulation of CYP2D6 expression. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45:42–48. doi: 10.1124/dmd.116.072249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sychev DA, Ashraf GM, Svistunov AA, Maksimov ML, Tarasov VV, Chubarev VN, Otdelenov VA, Denisenko NP, Barreto GE, Aliev G. The cytochrome P450 isoenzyme and some new opportunities for the prediction of negative drug interaction in vivo. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018;12:1147–1156. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S149069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reddy BM, Rao NK, Ramesh M, Rao AVNA, Lin LJ, Lin LZ, Cordell GA. Chemical investigation of the fruits of terminalia chebula. Pharm Biol. 1994;32:352–356. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gao J, Ajala OS, Wang CY, Xu HY, Yao JH, Zhang HP, Jukov A, Ma CM. Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of Terminalia phenolics after intragastric administration of the aqueous extracts of the fruit of Terminalia chebula and a Mongolian compound medicine-Gurigumu-7. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;185:300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
