Abstract
Background
Angiopoietin-like protein 1 (ANGPTL1) has been proved to suppress tumor metastasis in several cancers. However, its extracellular effects on the pre-metastatic niches (PMNs) are still unclear. ANGPTL1 has been identified in exosomes, while its function remains unknown. This study was designed to explore the role of exosomal ANGPTL1 on liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifugation. The ANGPTL1 level was detected in exosomes derived from human CRC tissues. The effects of exosomal ANGPTL1 on CRC liver metastasis were explored by the intrasplenic injection mouse model. The liver PMN was examined by vascular permeability assays. Exosomal ANGPTL1 localization was validated by exosome labeling. The regulatory mechanisms of exosomal ANGPTL1 on Kupffer cells were determined by RNA sequencing. qRT-PCR, Western Blot, and ELISA analysis were conducted to examine gene expressions at mRNA and protein levels.
Results
ANGPTL1 protein level was significantly downregulated in the exosomes derived from CRC tumors compared with paired normal tissues. Besides, exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated liver metastasis and impeded vascular leakiness in the liver PMN. Moreover, exosomal ANGPTL1 was mainly taken up by KCs and regulated the KCs secretion pattern, enormously decreasing the MMP9 expression, which finally prevented the liver vascular leakiness. In mechanism, exosomal ANGPTL1 downregulated MMP9 level in KCs by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway.
Conclusions
Taken together, exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated CRC liver metastasis and impeded vascular leakiness in the liver PMN by reprogramming the Kupffer cell and decreasing the MMP9 expression. This study suggests a suppression role of exosomal ANGPTL1 on CRC liver metastasis and expands the approach of ANGPTL1 functioning.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-020-01816-3.
Keywords: Exosomal ANGPTL1, Colorectal Cancer, Liver metastasis, PMNs, Kupffer cell, MMP9
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common digestive tract malignancies worldwide with high prevalence and mortality [1]. Distant metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-associated death in CRC patients [2]. The 5-year survival rate is 92% for patients with local disease, while it sharply declines to 53 and 11% for patients with regional and distant metastasis [3]. The liver is the most common site of CRC metastasis. It is reported that ≤25% of CRC patients have synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) upon diagnosis, and up to half of CRCs will eventually lead to liver metastasis [4]. Despite advances in surgical technique and targeted therapy, CLM patients’ prognosis is still poor [5]. It is urgent to explore the mechanism of liver metastasis and seek a new strategy for CLM treatment.
In our previous study [6], we found some of the angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs) were downregulated in CRC tissue, among which ANGPTL1 was the most significant one. ANGPTLs are a family of proteins similar to angiopoietins in structure, including ANGPTL1 to ANGPTL8 [7]. They were reported to affect angiogenesis [7], inflammation [8], metabolism disorders [9], hematopoiesis [10], and cancer development [11, 12]. Early studies showed that Angiopoietin-like protein 1 (ANGPTL1) acts as an antiangiogenic factor and a tumor suppressor [13, 14]. ANGPTL1 is downregulated in various cancers [6, 7], and several studies have proved its inhibitory role in tumor growth and metastasis [15–18]. Our previous study also demonstrated that ANGPTL1 overexpression inhibited the migration and invasion of CRC cells, leading to liver metastasis suppression. Besides, low expression of ANGPTL1 was related to poorer prognosis in CRC patients [6].
Nevertheless, previous researches about ANGPTL1’s function limited in primary tumors [6, 16, 18]. As a secretory protein [14], the biological effects of extracellular ANGPTL1 on the metastatic organs are still under investigation. Increasing evidence shows that the primary tumor-secreted factors and exosomes can enhance metastasis by promoting a supportive microenvironment in the metastatic organs, named the pre-metastatic niches (PMNs). The PMNs include several characteristics, such as vascular leakiness, inflammation, and immunosuppression [19]. Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles ranging from 50 to160 nm in size carrying proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids [20]. Recently, tumor-derived exosomes have been reported to be involved in PMNs formation [21, 22]. As the earliest event during PMNs evolution, vascular permeability is always regulated by tumor-derived exosomes [23]. For instance, CRC-derived exosomal miR-25-3p can promote PMNs formation by inducing vascular permeability [24]; breast cancer-derived exosomal miR-105 can destroy vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis [25]. Interestingly, ANGPTL1 has been identified in exosomes derived from saliva [26], urine [27], and ovarian cancer cells [28]. Nevertheless, the function of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC is still unknown.
In this study, we focused on the role of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC metastasis. We studied the protein level of ANGPTL1 in exosomes derived from tumor and normal tissues in CRC patients. Both In vivo and in vitro models were applied to characterize the effects of exosomal ANGPTL1 on CRC liver metastasis and PMNs formation. We demonstrated that exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuates CRC liver metastasis by regulating the kupffer cell secretion pattern and impeding vascular leakiness in the liver PMN.
Methods
Patients and specimens
The clinical CRC and paired normal tissues were obtained from CRC patients (n = 8) in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. This project was approved by the ethical committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Cell culture
The human colorectal cancer cell line SW620 and Human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The ANGPTL1 stably overexpressed cell line (SW620-ANGPTL1) and its control cell line (SW620-Ctrl) were established in the previous study [6]. The Immortalized Mouse Kupffer Cell line (ImKC) was purchased from MilliporeSigma (USA). SW620 cells and HUVECs were cultured in RMPI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Brazil). ImKC were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Brazil).
Exosome collection and characterization
Exosomes were collected by sequential ultracentrifugation. CRC cells were cultured in the exosome-depleted (160,000×g, 16 h) complete medium for 72 h. The supernatants were collected and centrifugate at 500×g for 10 min to remove cell contamination, then at 3000×g for 20 min to remove apoptotic bodies and large cell debris, followed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 20 min to remove large microvesicles. Next, exosomes were collected by 100,000×g centrifugation for 70 min (Beckman Ti70). The exosome pellet was resuspended in 20 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and collected by 100,000×g ultracentrifugation for 70 min (Beckman Ti70). Exosome preparation was verified by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Exosome size was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis using Zetasizer Nano ZSE (Malvern Panalytical, Shanghai, China).
For tissue-derived exosome collection, the CRC tumors and paired normal tissues were cut into 1 mm × 1 mm pieces and cultured in 15 mL of FBS-free RMPI-1640 medium for 24 h. Then the supernatant was harvested for further isolation of exosomes.
Exosome treatment and labeling
Purified exosomes were injected into the mouse retro-orbital venous sinus in a total volume of 100 μL PBS. For in vivo education experiments, mice received 5 μg of exosomes every other day for 21 days. Retro-orbital injection of PBS was used in control groups. For in vitro education, exosomes (10 μg/mL) were added into the culture medium (CM) of ImKC for 3, 6, 12, 24 h. For exosome-tracking experiments, exosomes were labeled using PKH67 membrane dye (Sigma, Shanghai, China), followed by 100,000×g ultracentrifugation for 70 min, and labeled exosomes were resuspended in PBS. In experiments involving the evaluation of exosome incorporation, labeled exosomes were injected retro-orbitally into the mice or added into the CM of ImKC 24 h before immunofluorescence analysis for exosome cells.
Animal model
To analyze the role of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC liver metastasis, we pre-educated the 6–8-week-old scid-beige mice (SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) retro-orbitally with exosomes for 21 days (5μg/100ul, every other day). Then, 2 × 106 SW620 cells were injected into the mice spleen as described in the previous study [29, 30]. A small animal IVIS Lumina Imaging System (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA) was used for liver lesion monitor. All mice were sacrificed at one month, and the livers were harvested for Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and analysis of metastases. For liver macrophage elimination, liposome clodronate was injected via the tail vein in a dose of 0.2 mL/20-25 g as a tool to suppress macrophage function by inducing apoptosis [31]. Liposomes containing PBS were injected as a control. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
In vivo vascular permeability assay
After pre-education with exosomes for 21 days, mice were injected with the recombinant mouse MMP9 (rmMMP9; 50 μg/kg body weight; R&D) intravenously. The rmMMP9 was preactivated using 1 mM aminophenylmercuricacetate (AMPA, Sigma, Shanghai, China) for 2 h at 37 °C. One hour after rmMMP9 injection, FITC-Dextran (~70KD; 100 mg/kg; Sigma, Shanghai, China) was injected through the tail vein. After one hour, mice were sacrificed and perfused with PBS to remove the excess dye. Liver tissues were embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura; Torrance, CA, USA) to make frozen blocks for sectioning and immunofluorescent staining. Stained sections were viewed and photographed with a fluorescence microscope. The intensity of fluorescence was measured using ImageJ software (ImageJ software v1.8.0).
Endothelial permeability
HUVECs (2 × 104) were seeded on transwell filters (0.4 μm pore size; Corning, Shanghai, China). After reaching confluence, HUVECs were treated with CM from ImKC educated by PBS, Ctrl-Exo, or ANGPTL1-Exo (with or without rmMMP9, 100 ng/mL) for 48 h. Then, FITC-Dextran (1 mg/mL) was added to the top well. 40 μL medium in the bottom well was taken for fluorescence measurement every 30 min using a SpectraMax microplate reader (SpectraMax i3, Molecular Devices, USA) at 488 nm excitation and 520 nm emission. The fluorescence intensity represents the passage of FITC-Dextran, which represents the the HUVECs layer permeability.
Small interfering (siRNA) transfection
Mouse MMP9 siRNA was purchased from Tsingke biological technology (Hangzhou, China). The MMP9 siRNA and scramble siRNA were added into the ImKC 24 h after exosome pre-education. The siRNA transfection was performed with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The siRNA sequences were as follows: MMP9 siRNA, 5′-CAAGACAAAGCCUAUUUCUTT-3′ (sense), 5′-AGAAAUAGGCUUUGUCUUGTT-3′ (antisense).
qRT-PCR
Total RNAs were isolated from cells and mouse livers with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and evaluated using NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). qRT-PCR was conducted using a standard SYBR-Green PCR kit protocol (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) with a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Shanghai, China). The primers were synthesized by Tsingke biological technology (Hangzhou, China). The sequences of all primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Genes | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|
Gapdh | GGTGAAGGTCGGTGTGAACG | CTCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTG |
Lif | ATTGTGCCCTTACTGCTGCTG | GCCAGTTGATTCTTGATCTGGT |
Il-1a | CGCTTGAGTCGGCAAAGAAAT | CTTCCCGTTGCTTGACGTTG |
Ccl5 | GCTGCTTTGCCTACCTCTCC | TCGAGTGACAAACACGACTGC |
Csf3 | GCACTATGGTCAGGACGAGAG | GGGGAAATACCCGATAGAGCC |
Mmp9 | TGTCTGGAGATTCGACTTGAAGTC | TGAGTTCCAGGGCACACCA |
Cxcl2 | CCAACCACCAGGCTACAGG | GCGTCACACTCAAGCTCTG |
ZO1 | TTCGTACCTGGCATTGACTGG | TTCGTACCTGGCATTGACTGG |
CLND5 | CTCTGCTGGTTCGCCAACAT | CAGCTCGTACTTCTGCGACA |
RNA sequencing
Total RNA of ImKC cells educated by PBS or exosomes for 24 h in vitro was extracted and subjected to BGI (Huada Genomics Institute Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, China) for RNA sequencing. The DEGseq R package was used to analyze differentially expressed genes based on the conditions of a fold change (FC) ≥ 1 and Q-values ≤0.001. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed to explore the significant pathways. All mRNA sequencing data were uploaded to NCBI (accession number PRJNA656088).
Western blot and ELISA
The tissue lysates were prepared using RIPA lysis buffer, while the cell and exosome lysates were prepared using 3× Loading Buffer. All samples were performed as depicted previously [6]. Exosome proteins were detected with the antibodies as follows: Alix (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), Calnexin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), CD9 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA), ANGPTL1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA), TSG101 (1:1000, Abcam, Shanghai, China), ANGPTL1 (1:1000, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). ImKC proteins were detected with the antibodies as follows: STAT3 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), phospho-STAT3 (Y705) (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), JAK2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), phospho-JAK2 (Y1008) (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), GAPDH (1: 2500, Huabio, Hangzhou, China). HUVECs proteins were detected using the antibodies listed as follows: Claudin-5 (1:1000, Abcam, Shanghai, China), ZO-1 (1:1000, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA). All samples were further incubated with the peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000, Huabio, Hangzhou, China). Bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (YEASEN, Shanghai, China) and scanned via a Tanon 5200 Chemiluminescent Imaging System (Tanon, Shanghai, China). Quantitative analysis of WB was performed with ImageJ software (ImageJ v1.8.0).
In order to detect the protein level in the CM of ImKC through ELISA, cells were cultured in the presence of exosomes (10 μg/mL) for 24 h before supernatants were collected, and the MMP9 level was measured by mouse MMP9 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Immunofluorescence
For histological analysis, tissues were dissected and fixed in a mix of 2% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 20% sucrose solution overnight, followed by embedding and section. Then 6 μm O.C.T. tissue cryosections were stained with antibodies against F4/80 (1:100, eBioscience, Shanghai, China), αSMA (1:500, Abcam, Shanghai, China), CD31 (1:200, Abcam, Shanghai, China), MMP9 (1:200, Abcam, Shanghai, China). Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 555, or 594 were used (1:500, Abcam, Shanghai, China). Fluorescent images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using Zen software (ZEN 3.0).
For ZO-1 detection in HUVECs, cell immunofluorescence was conducted as described previously [32]. Cells were incubated with primary antibody ZO-1 (1:400, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA) at 4 °C overnight. Nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min. Cells were viewed under the Zeiss LSM 710 laser confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using Zen software (ZEN 3.0).
Statistics
All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) or mean ± standard deviation of the mean (SD). Statistical analyses were performed with Student’s t-test for comparisons between two groups and with ANOVA for more than two groups using Prism 8.0. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
ANGPTL1 level was downregulated in CRC derived exosomes
To study the ANGPTL1 expression in CRC-derived exosomes, we first detected the ANGPTL1 protein level in exosomes secreted by CRC tumors (TDEs) and paired normal tissues (NDEs). We collected eight pairs of samples from our oncology center and isolated the tissue-derived exosomes by ultracentrifugation. The characteristic of TDEs and NDEs were accessed by TEM, DLS, and Western Blot (WB) (Fig. 1a-c). We observed a cup-shaped structure in both TDEs and NDEs, with the diameter of most particles around 150 nm. WB analysis of the exosomal proteins showed that ANGPTL1 level was significantly decreased in TDEs than in paired NDEs (P = 0.03, Fig. 1d and e, see the detailed ANGPTL1 index of each sample in additional file 4 Table S1). What is more, the ANGPTL1 level in TDEs varied among CRC patients, indicating the patient heterogeneity of exosomal ANGPTL1 levels. The above results suggested that ANGPTL1 was downregulated in CRC derived exosomes, and exosomal ANGPTL1 may be involved in CRC progression.
Exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated liver metastasis and impeded vascular leakiness in the liver PMN
In our previous study [6], ANGPTL1 overexpression inhibited the migration and invasion of CRC cells and hindered liver metastasis. To further investigate the function of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC, SW620-ANGPTL1 cells were used to enrich the exosomal ANGPTL1. Exosomes were collected from the CM of SW620 (named Ctrl-Exo) and SW620-ANGPTL1 (named ANGPTL1-Exo) through ultracentrifugation (Additional file 1 Fig. S1a and S1b). WB analysis confirmed that ANGPTL1 was abundant in ANGPTL1-Exo (Additional file 1 Fig. S1c).
We then employed an intrasplenic injection mouse model to investigate the role of exosomal ANGPTL1 in liver metastasis. Firstly, SCID-Beige mice were injected retro-orbitally every other day for 21 days with PBS, Ctrl-Exo, or ANGPTL1-Exo in a process that is defined as “education” (Fig. 2a). After that, 2 × 106 SW620 cells were injected into the mouse spleens. The IVIS Lumina imaging system was used to monitor the liver metastasis weekly. At the fourth week, we found the fluorescence intensity in mouse livers was lower in the ANGPTL1-Exo education group, compared with the Ctrl-Exo education group (P = 0.02, Fig. 2b). Then mice were sacrificed, and their livers were harvested for H&E examination (Fig. 2c). The liver macrometastatic burden was measured by lesion areas. We found a heavier metastatic burden in mouse livers educated by Ctrl-Exo than by PBS or ANGPTL1-Exo (PBS vs Ctrl-Exo, P < 0.01; Ctrl-Exo vs ANGPTL1-Exo, P < 0.01; Fig. 2c). The results suggested that exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated liver metastasis induced by tumor-derived exosomes in CRC.
It is known that cancer cells spread through the body in multiple steps [33]. Our intrasplenic mouse model allowed tumor cells to immediately disseminate through the portal circulation after injection [30], making tumor extravasation the first step during liver metastasis. Vascular permeability is one of the most critical factors in this process, and a typical characteristic of PMNs [34]. Furthermore, ANGPTL1 was proved to regulate angiogenesis [7]. Thus, we focused on exosomal ANGPTL1’s function on liver vascular permeability. The effect of Ctrl-Exo and ANGPTL1-Exo on endothelial barriers was then detected in vivo. Mice educated by PBS or exosomes were injected with FITC-Dextran through tail veins. More fluorescence was detected in the liver educated by Ctrl-Exo than by PBS. In comparison, less fluorescence was detected in the liver educated by ANGPTL1-Exo (P < 0.001, Fig. 2d), which indicated that exosomal ANGPTL1 could impede the vascular leakiness in liver PMNs induced by tumor-derived exosomes.
Exosomal ANGPTL1 was mainly taken up by KCs and regulated KCs secretion pattern
To explore the mechanism of how exosomal ANGPTL1 inhibits CRC liver metastasis, we first try to determine the cells that take up CRC derived exosomes in the liver. The PKH67 labeled Ctrl-Exo and ANGPTL1-Exo were injected intravenously. Twenty-four hours post-injection, mouse livers were harvested, and liver frozen sections were analyzed by immunofluorescence. We found the cells which took up exosomes were mainly F4/80 positive, a surface marker of KCs (Fig. 3a). Besides, the labeled exosomes failed to fuse with other cells in the liver microenvironment, such as αSMA+ hepatic stellate cells or CD31+ endothelial cells (Additional file 2 Fig. S2a and S2b). To validate the KC-specific localization of exosomes, we treated the mice with liposome clodronate, known to deplete macrophages, via tail vein injection. We found that 48 h of treatment was enough to ablate most of the F4/80+ cells in the mouse liver (Additional file 2 Fig. S2c). Then, the PKH67 labeled exosomes were injected into the mice. We found no exosome remained in livers after macrophage ablation (Fig. 3b), indicating that KC is the predominant cell taking up CRC derived exosomes. Also, we examined the exosome uptake of KCs in vitro. PKH67 labeled Ctrl-Exo and ANGPTL1-Exo were co-cultured with ImKC and were both taken by ImKC in 2 h (Additional file 2 Fig. S2d) and stably fused into ImKC in 4 h (Fig. 3c).
The above results implied that exosomal ANGPTL1 might inhibit CRC liver metastasis through regulating KCs. To further investigate the effect of exosomal ANGPTL1 on KCs, we educated ImKC with PBS, Ctrl-Exo, and ANGPTL1-Exo in vitro for 24 h and analyzed gene expression by mRNA sequencing. GO enrichment analysis showed that the changing genes between ImKC educated by Ctrl-Exo and ANGPTL1-Exo mainly belonged to the extracellular region (Fig. 3d), which suggested that the secretion pattern of KCs was regulated. Among the top20 genes (Fig. 3e), Mmp9, Lif, Cxcl2, Csf3, Il1a, and Ccl5 were verified by qRT-PCR (Fig. 3f, P < 0.05). The six genes were significantly downregulated in ImKC educated by ANGPTL1-Exo, and all of them were reported to be involved in PMNs formation. Taken together, we found that exosomal ANGPTL1 was mainly taken up by KCs and regulated KCs secretion pattern, which may result in liver PMNs remodeling.
Exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent MMP9 decrease in KCs normalized vascular leakiness induced by CRC derived exosomes
Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) is intimately involved in regulating vascular integrity in PMNs [23]. To explore the effect of exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent MMP9 decrease on vascular leakiness, we first verified the MMP9 downregulation in KCs. The ELISA analysis showed that MMP9 was significantly decreased in the CM of ImKC educated by ANGPTL1-Exo than by Ctrl-Exo (Fig. 4a, P < 0.05). We also confirmed that the MMP9 decrease in ANGPTL1-Exo educated mouse livers (Additional file 3 Fig. S3a and S3b). Next, we accessed the permeability of endothelial monolayer after treatment with the CM of ImKC by measuring the passage of FITC-Dextran (70 KD). We found that the CM of ANGPTL1-Exo educated ImKC significantly decreased fluorescent probe leakiness as compared to the CM of Ctrl-Exo educated ImKC (Fig. 4b). We then silenced MMP9 expression in ImKC by siRNA transfection 24 h after Ctrl-Exo education (Additional file 3 Fig. S3c). The CM from MMP9 silencing ImKC caused less fluorescence passage than scramble siRNA (Fig. 4c), which was consistent with the effect of the CM from ANGPTL1-Exo educated ImKC. Moreover, active rmMMP9 was added into the CM of ImKC educated by ANGPTL1-Exo and resulted in more fluorescent probe passing through the endothelial cell (EC) layer (Fig. 4c). The same tendency was observed in the in vivo vascular permeability assay, and rmMMP9 treatment deteriorated liver vascular leakiness in the mice educated by ANGPTL1-Exo (P < 0.001, Fig. 4d).
Since the tight junction proteins (TJs) were proved to regulate the EC layer permeability [35], we examined the TJs levels in ECs. The results showed that ZO-1 and Claudin-5 was upregulated in HUVECs treated by the CM of ImKC educated by ANGPTL1-Exo than by Ctrl-Exo. The effect was abolished by extra rmMMP9 (Fig. 4e and f). Immunofluorescence analysis also revealed that rmMMP9 dampened the ZO-1 upregulation in HUVEC monolayers after treatment with CM of ANGPTL1-Exo educated ImKC (Fig. 4g). All the above data above indicated that MMP9 was involved in exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent vascular leakiness prevention.
Exosomal ANGPTL1 downregulated MMP9 in KCs by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway
To further investigate how exosomal ANGPTL1 downregulated MMP9 expression in KCs, we conducted KEGG enrichment to analyze the RNA sequencing data. The results showed that the changing genes between ImKC educated by Ctrl-Exo and ANGPTL1-Exo were mainly enriched in IL-17, TNF, Toll-like receptor, and JAK-STAT signaling pathway (Fig. 5a). Since ANGPTL1 was reported to inhibit the JAK2-STAT3 pathway [18], we focused on the effect of exosomal ANGPTL1 on the JAK2-STAT3 pathway. WB analysis showed that ANGPTL1-Exo obviously inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 (Y705) and JAK2 (Y1008) in KCs at 6, 12, 24 h (Fig. 5b and c). MMP9 is known as one of the target genes of STAT3 [36]. To confirm if the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway involved in exosomal ANGPTL1 induced MMP9 downregulation in KCs, the recombinant mouse IL-6 was used to active ImKC, which is a specific activator of STAT3. The WB results showed that IL-6 activated the phosphorylation of STAT3 (Y705) and increased the MMP9 mRNA expression in ImKC educated by ANGTPL1-Exo in 24 h (Fig. 5d). The above data demonstrated that exosomal ANGPTL1 downregulated MMP9 in KCs by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 pathway, which may be the mechanism of exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent vascular leakiness prevention and liver metastasis attenuation.
Discussion
ANGPTL1 has been reported to suppress tumor metastasis in several cancers [7], while its extracellular effects on the PMNs are still unclear. Our present study was intended to determine the function of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC liver metastasis.
In this study, we found that ANGPTL1 expression was downregulated in the exosomes derived from CRC tumor tissues than paired normal colorectal tissues. The exosomes containing more ANGPTL1 proteins attenuated liver metastasis and impeded vascular leakiness. Further exploration showed that exosomal ANGPTL1 regulated the KCs secretion pattern, significantly decreased the MMP9 expression by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 pathway, which in turn normalized vascular leakiness in live PMN (Fig. 5e).
An increasing number of studies have found that ANGPTL1 could be secreted in exosomes. Sinha A et al. identified ANGPTL1 in human ovarian cancer cell-derived exosomes by mass spectrometry [28]. ANGPTL1 was also detected in exosomes derived from human saliva [26] and urine [27]. However, the role of exosomal ANGPTL1 is unknown. Our study demonstrated for the first time that ANGPTL1 expression was downregulated in exosomes derived from CRC tumors than paired normal tissues. It was similar to its differential expression in CRC tumors and normal tissues [6, 37], suggesting a possible suppression role of exosomal ANGPTL1 on CRC progression.
Our functional experiments in mouse models of CRC proved that the exosomal ANGPTL1 upregulation inhibited liver metastasis. Consistently, early studies have proved that ANGPTL1 hindered tumor metastasis in lung cancer [16], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [18], and CRC [6]. But the mechanism varies. Actually, cancer metastasis is a multi-step process [33]. So far, researchers mostly focus on ANGPTL1’s impact on the primary sites, such as tumor invasiveness and mobility inhibition, which prevent tumor cells from invading nearby tissues and moving through the vascular walls [15, 16, 18]. However, we paid our attention to the metastatic organs and found exosomal ANGPTL1 impeded liver vascular leakiness induced by CRC derived exosomes. Growing evidence indicates that exosomes serve as mediators for long-distance cell-to-cell communication and play a pivotal part in PMNs formation [20]. Several studies have shown increased vascular permeability at PMNs, including liver PMN, which is associated with an enhanced metastatic burden [34]. For example, the melanoma-derived exosomes increased the metastatic behavior of primary tumors by inducing vascular leakiness at pre-metastatic sites [38]; breast cancer-derived exosomes destroyed vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis [39]. Thus, it may be reasonable to imply that exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated CRC liver metastasis by preventing liver vascular leakiness. However, whether exosomal ANGPTL1 affected vascular permeability through a direct effect on the endothelial cells or other indirect way is still unknown.
Our study found that KC was the predominant cell that took up CRC-derived exosomes in the liver, which was also approved by Shao Yingkuan et al. [40]. It indicated that exosomal ANGPTL1 possibly remodeled the liver PMNs through KCs. Several studies have correlated KCs with PMNs formation and liver metastasis [41, 42]. Once reprogrammed by tumor-derived exosomes, KCs exert their regurgitation-feeding activity on liver microenvironments via the secretion of cytokines and chemokines [40, 43]. We detected an evident variation of the secretion profile of factors from KCs upon exposure to exosomal ANGPTL1, which influenced the liver PMN formation. Among these changing factors, we attributed MMP9 to exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent vascular leakiness prevention. The ANGPTLs were reported to regulate the expression of MMP9 in osteosarcoma [44] and HCC [45]. Moreover, MMP9 is known to be involved in regulating vascular integrity in PMNs [23]. High levels of MMP9 in the pre-metastatic lung promoted vascular remodeling, while genetic ablation of MMP9 normalized the aberrant vasculature in the lung PMN, impeding cancer metastasis [46]. The above evidence suggested that exosomal ANGPTL1 reprogrammed KC and downregulated its MMP9 expression, thus preventing liver vascular leakiness and hindering CRC liver metastasis.
Like proteins or microRNAs, exosomal cargos can regulate the recipient cells’ physiological activities [47]. We demonstrated that exosomal ANGPTL1 inhibited the JAK2-STAT3 signal pathway, especially hindered STAT3 activation. The exosomal ANGPTL1 dependent MMP9 downregulation was reversed by IL-6 induced STAT3 activation. It indicated that exosomal ANGPTL1 downregulated the MMP9 expression by inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway. Consistently, Qian Yan et al. also found ANGPTL1 repressed the JAK-STAT3 signaling in HCC [18]. There is substantial evidence confirming that the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway is involved in CRC development [48]. STAT3 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) is a critical transcriptional factor identified as a central regulator of tumor metastasis. STAT3 could be activated by IL-6 and promote gene transcription, including MMP9 [36]. Therefore, we implied that exosomal ANGPTL1 might influence liver vascular permeability through the JAK2-STAT3-MMP9 axis.
However, how exosomal ANGPTL1 inhibited the JAK2-STAT3 pathway still needs further investigation. The way that exosomes transfer the content or induce signals may involve ligand-receptor interaction or cytomembrane fusion [20]. Several studies have shown that ANGPTL proteins deliver their signals via integrin receptor-related pathways [16, 18]. The previous study proved that ANGPTL1 interacted with the integrin α1β1 receptor to suppress the downstream FAK/Src-JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway [18]. Besides, ANGPTL1 worked intracellular to represses the Src-JAK-STAT3 signaling [18]. Therefore, we implied that the possible mechanism of exosomal ANGPTL1 inhibiting JAK2-STAT3 pathway might be: (1) ANGPTL1 exists on the exosome membrane and binds the integrin receptors on the KCs membrane, suppressing the downstream JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway; (2) exosomes fuse with the KCs membrane, and ANGPTL1 is released into the cytoplasm, inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 pathway through interaction with molecules involved in the pathway. These questions will be explored in our future research.
Conclusion
This study aimed to explore the function of exosomal ANGPTL1 in CRC liver metastasis. Our experimental results demonstrated that ANGPTL1 was downregulated in CRC derived exosomes. More importantly, exosomal ANGPTL1 attenuated CRC liver metastasis and impeded vascular leakiness. In mechanism, we found exosomal reprogrammed the Kupffer cell and decreased MMP9 expression through inhibiting the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway. These findings suggest a suppression role of exosomal ANGPTL1 on CRC progression, and expand the approach of ANGPTL1 functioning, enriching the mechanisms of CRC liver metastasis.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- CRC
colorectal cancer
- CLM
colorectal liver metastasis
- PMNs
pre-metastatic niches
- PBS
Phosphate buffer saline
- OD
Optical density
- ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- SD
Standard deviation
- SEM
standard error of the mean
- ANGPTL1
Angiopoietin-like protein 1
- HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- PDAC
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- KCs
Kupffer cells
- HUVEC
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells
- ImKC
Immortalized Mouse Kupffer Cells
- TDEs
tumor-derived exosomes
- NDEs
normal tissue-derived exosomes
- TEM
Transmission electron microscopy
- DLS
dynamic light scattering
- rmMMP9
recombinant mouse MMP9
- CM
culture medium
- AMPA
aminophenylmercuricacetate
- EC
endothelial cell
- TJs
tight junction proteins
- KEGG
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- GO
Gene Ontology
- H&E staining
Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Authors’ contributions
Kai Jiang, Haiyan Chen, and Yimin Fang designed and conducted most of the experiments in this study and analyzed the data. They contributed equally to this work. Liubo Chen, Chenhan Zhong, Tongtong Bu, Siqi Dai, Xiang Pan, Dongliang Fu, Yucheng Qian, and Jingsun Wei finished the rest part of the experiments in this study. Kefeng Ding provided guidance for this work and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81772545, 11932017); the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0908200); the Key Technology Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (No. 2017C03017).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments containing patient specimens or data were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and informed consent was obtained from all patients. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Zhejiang, P.R. China).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Kai Jiang, Haiyan Chen and Yimin Fang are co-first authors.
References
- 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH, Stein KD, Alteri R, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:271–289. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Capdevila J, Saura C, Macarulla T, Casado E, Ramos FJ, Tabernero J. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(Suppl 2):S24–S34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen H, Xiao Q, Hu Y, Chen L, Jiang K, Tang Y, Tan Y, Hu W, Wang Z, He J, et al. ANGPTL1 attenuates colorectal cancer metastasis by up-regulating microRNA-138. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017;36:78. doi: 10.1186/s13046-017-0548-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carbone C, Piro G, Merz V, Simionato F, Santoro R, Zecchetto C, Tortora G, Melisi D. Angiopoietin-like proteins in angiogenesis, inflammation and Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):431. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tabata M, Kadomatsu T, Fukuhara S, Miyata K, Ito Y, Endo M, Urano T, Zhu HJ, Tsukano H, Tazume H, et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 promotes chronic adipose tissue inflammation and obesity-related systemic insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009;10:178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kersten S. Regulation of lipid metabolism via angiopoietin-like proteins. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:1059–1062. doi: 10.1042/BST0331059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang CC, Kaba M, Ge G, Xie K, Tong W, Hug C, Lodish HF. Angiopoietin-like proteins stimulate ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:240–245. doi: 10.1038/nm1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sato R, Yamasaki M, Hirai K, Matsubara T, Nomura T, Sato F, Mimata H. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 induces androgen-independent and malignant behavior in human prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2015;33:58–66. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lim SY, Gordon-Weeks A, Allen D, Kersemans V, Beech J, Smart S, Muschel RJ. Cd11b(+) myeloid cells support hepatic metastasis through down-regulation of angiopoietin-like 7 in cancer cells. Hepatology. 2015;62:521–533. doi: 10.1002/hep.27838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim I, Kwak HJ, Ahn JE, So JN, Liu M, Koh KN, Koh GY. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel angiopoietin family protein, angiopoietin-3. FEBS Lett. 1999;443:353–356. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dhanabal M, LaRochelle WJ, Jeffers M, Herrmann J, Rastelli L, McDonald WF, Chillakuru RA, Yang M, Boldog FL, Padigaru M, et al. Angioarrestin: an antiangiogenic protein with tumor-inhibiting properties. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3834–3841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu Y, Liu YJ, Yu Q. Angiopoietin-3 inhibits pulmonary metastasis by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6119–6126. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kuo TC, Tan CT, Chang YW, Hong CC, Lee WJ, Chen MW, Jeng YM, Chiou J, Yu P, Chen PS, et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 1 suppresses SLUG to inhibit cancer cell motility. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1082–1095. doi: 10.1172/JCI64044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen HA, Kuo TC, Tseng CF, Ma JT, Yang ST, Yen CJ, Yang CY, Sung SY, Su JL. Angiopoietin-like protein 1 antagonizes MET receptor activity to repress sorafenib resistance and cancer stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2016;64:1637–1651. doi: 10.1002/hep.28773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yan Q, Jiang L, Liu M, Yu D, Zhang Y, Li Y, Fang S, Li Y, Zhu YH, Yuan YF, Guan XY. ANGPTL1 interacts with integrin alpha1beta1 to suppress HCC angiogenesis and metastasis by inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cancer Res. 2017;77:5831–5845. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peinado H, Zhang H, Matei IR, Costa-Silva B, Hoshino A, Rodrigues G, Psaila B, Kaplan RN, Bromberg JF, Kang Y, et al. Pre-metastatic niches: organ-specific homes for metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:302–317. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Minciacchi VR, Freeman MR, Di Vizio D. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: exosomes, microvesicles and the emerging role of large oncosomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;40:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xie F, Zhou X, Fang M, Li H, Su P, Tu Y, Zhang L, Zhou F. Extracellular vesicles in Cancer immune microenvironment and Cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2019;6:1901779. doi: 10.1002/advs.201901779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaplan RN, Riba RD, Zacharoulis S, Bramley AH, Vincent L, Costa C, MacDonald DD, Jin DK, Shido K, Kerns SA, et al. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature. 2005;438:820–827. doi: 10.1038/nature04186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zeng Z, Li Y, Pan Y, Lan X, Song F, Sun J, Zhou K, Liu X, Ren X, Wang F, et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-25-3p promotes pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5395. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07810-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhou W, Fong MY, Min Y, Somlo G, Liu L, Palomares MR, Yu Y, Chow A, O'Connor ST, Chin AR, et al. Cancer-secreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:501–515. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez-Begne M, Lu B, Han X, Hagen FK, Hand AR, Melvin JE, Yates JR. Proteomic analysis of human parotid gland Exosomes by multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) J Proteome Res. 2009;8:1304–1314. doi: 10.1021/pr800658c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Z, Hill S, Luther JM, Hachey DL, Schey KL. Proteomic analysis of urine exosomes by multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) Proteomics. 2012;12:329–338. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sinha A, Ignatchenko V, Ignatchenko A, Mejia-Guerrero S, Kislinger T. In-depth proteomic analyses of ovarian cancer cell line exosomes reveals differential enrichment of functional categories compared to the NCI 60 proteome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;445:694–701. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang K, Jiao Y, Liu Y, Fu D, Geng H, Chen L, Chen H, Shen X, Sun L, Ding K. HNF6 promotes tumor growth in colorectal cancer and enhances liver metastasis in mouse model. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:3675–3684. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kozlowski JM, Fidler IJ, Campbell D, Xu ZL, Kaighn ME, Hart IR. Metastatic behavior of human tumor cell lines grown in the nude mouse. Cancer Res. 1984;44:3522–3529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zeisberger SM, Odermatt B, Marty C, Zehnder-Fjallman AH, Ballmer-Hofer K, Schwendener RA. Clodronate-liposome-mediated depletion of tumour-associated macrophages: a new and highly effective antiangiogenic therapy approach. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:272–281. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li J, Li Z, Jiang P, Peng M, Zhang X, Chen K, Liu H, Bi H, Liu X, Li X. Circular RNA IARS (circ-IARS) secreted by pancreatic cancer cells and located within exosomes regulates endothelial monolayer permeability to promote tumor metastasis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:177. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0822-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011;147:275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang Y, Song N, Ding Y, Yuan S, Li X, Cai H, Shi H, Luo Y. Pulmonary vascular destabilization in the premetastatic phase facilitates lung metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7529–7537. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ma J, Wang P, Liu Y, Zhao L, Li Z, Xue Y. Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates blood-tumor barrier permeability via ZO-1, occludin and claudin-5. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229:916–926. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dechow TN, Pedranzini L, Leitch A, Leslie K, Gerald WL, Linkov I, Bromberg JF. Requirement of matrix metalloproteinase-9 for the transformation of human mammary epithelial cells by Stat3-C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10602–10607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404100101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fan H, Huang L, Zhuang X, Ai F, Sun W. Angiopoietin-like protein 1 inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cells via suppress Slug expression. Cytotechnology. 2019;71:35–44. doi: 10.1007/s10616-018-0259-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G, Hergueta-Redondo M, Williams C, Garcia-Santos G, Ghajar C, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18:883–891. doi: 10.1038/nm.2753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang S, Song R, Wang Z, Jing Z, Wang S, Ma J. S100A8/A9 in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1298. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shao Y, Chen T, Zheng X, Yang S, Xu K, Chen X, Xu F, Wang L, Shen Y, Wang T, et al. Colorectal cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles establish an inflammatory premetastatic niche in liver metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:1368–1379. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bayon LG, Izquierdo MA, Sirovich I, van Rooijen N, Beelen RH, Meijer S. Role of Kupffer cells in arresting circulating tumor cells and controlling metastatic growth in the liver. Hepatology. 1996;23:1224–1231. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wen SW, Ager EI, Christophi C. Bimodal role of Kupffer cells during colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013;14:606–613. doi: 10.4161/cbt.24593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, Singh S, Zhang H, Thakur BK, Becker A, Hoshino A, Mark MT, Molina H, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:816–826. doi: 10.1038/ncb3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Odagiri H, Kadomatsu T, Endo M, Masuda T, Morioka MS, Fukuhara S, Miyamoto T, Kobayashi E, Miyata K, Aoi J, et al. The secreted protein ANGPTL2 promotes metastasis of osteosarcoma cells through integrin alpha5beta1, p38 MAPK, and matrix metalloproteinases. Sci Signal. 2014;7:ra7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yu H, Zhang H, Li D, Xue H, Pan C, Zhao S, Wang L. Effects of ANGPTL3 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides transfection on the cell growths and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1742–1746. doi: 10.5754/hge10647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yan HH, Pickup M, Pang Y, Gorska AE, Li Z, Chytil A, Geng Y, Gray JW, Moses HL, Yang L. Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells tip the balance of immune protection to tumor promotion in the premetastatic lung. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6139–6149. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, Thery C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:9–17. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.