Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2020 Dec 28;18(12):e3000739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000739

Increased prostaglandin-D2 in male STAT3-deficient hearts shifts cardiac progenitor cells from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation

Elisabeth Stelling 1,#, Melanie Ricke-Hoch 1,#, Sergej Erschow 1, Steve Hoffmann 2, Anke Katharina Bergmann 3, Maren Heimerl 1, Stefan Pietzsch 1, Karin Battmer 4, Alexandra Haase 5, Britta Stapel 1,¤, Michaela Scherr 5, Jean-Luc Balligand 6, Ofer Binah 7, Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner 1,*
Editor: Cecilia W Lo8
PMCID: PMC7793290  PMID: 33370269

Abstract

Cardiac levels of the signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3 (STAT3) decline with age, and male but not female mice with a cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3 deficiency conditional knockout (CKO) display premature age-related heart failure associated with reduced cardiac capillary density. In the present study, isolated male and female CKO-cardiomyocytes exhibit increased prostaglandin (PG)-generating cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression. The PG-degrading hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase-15 (HPGD) expression is only reduced in male cardiomyocytes, which is associated with increased prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) secretion from isolated male but not female CKO-cardiomyocytes. Reduced HPGD expression in male cardiomyocytes derive from impaired androgen receptor (AR)–signaling due to loss of its cofactor STAT3. Elevated PGD2 secretion in males is associated with increased white adipocyte accumulation in aged male but not female hearts. Adipocyte differentiation is enhanced in isolated stem cell antigen-1 (SCA-1)+ cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) from young male CKO-mice compared with the adipocyte differentiation of male wild-type (WT)-CPC and CPC isolated from female mice. Epigenetic analysis in freshly isolated male CKO-CPC display hypermethylation in pro-angiogenic genes (Fgfr2, Epas1) and hypomethylation in the white adipocyte differentiation gene Zfp423 associated with up-regulated ZFP423 expression and a shift from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation compared with WT-CPC. The expression of the histone-methyltransferase EZH2 is reduced in male CKO-CPC compared with male WT-CPC, whereas no differences in the EZH2 expression in female CPC were observed. Clonally expanded CPC can differentiate into endothelial cells or into adipocytes depending on the differentiation conditions. ZFP423 overexpression is sufficient to induce white adipocyte differentiation of clonal CPC. In isolated WT-CPC, PGD2 stimulation reduces the expression of EZH2, thereby up-regulating ZFP423 expression and promoting white adipocyte differentiation. The treatment of young male CKO mice with the COX inhibitor Ibuprofen or the PGD2 receptor (DP)2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 in vivo increased EZH2 expression and reduced ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation in CKO-CPC. Thus, cardiomyocyte STAT3 deficiency leads to age-related and sex-specific cardiac remodeling and failure in part due to sex-specific alterations in PGD2 secretion and subsequent epigenetic impairment of the differentiation potential of CPC. Causally involved is the impaired AR signaling in absence of STAT3, which reduces the expression of the PG-degrading enzyme HPGD.


Impaired androgen-receptor-signaling due to STAT3-deficiency promotes increased prostaglandin-D2-secretion from male but not female cardiomyocytes; this induces an epigenetic switch in cardiac progenitor cells from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation, associated with reduced cardiac capillary density, increased cardiac white fat deposits and heart failure in aged male but not female mice.

Introduction

Men and women experience quite different cardiovascular disease susceptibility profiles and outcome, a feature that is poorly understood. Further, the effects of biologic sex on health, disease susceptibility, and mortality are vastly understudied [1, 2]. Recent studies showed that genetics contribute to sex-specific differences in fat tissue and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases [3]. Pathophysiologically enhanced cardiac fat content is frequently observed in patients with heart failure, in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD), and after myocardial infarction [46]. In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), increased fat deposits are associated with more severe left ventricular (LV) dilatation and decreased systolic LV function, compared with DCM patients without enhanced cardiac fat [6]. Three different types of fat tissue exist of which brown adipose tissue (BAT), mostly present in embryonic and fetal stages, and beige adipose tissue (BET) present postnatally, utilize glucose and lipids to generate heat, and are associated with improved cardiometabolic health [7]. Brown and beige adipocytes harbor many similar properties, including multilocular lipid droplets, dense mitochondria, and the activation of a thermogenic gene program involving the PR domain containing 16 (PRDM16) protein. PRDM16 is a transcriptional coregulator that controls the development of brown and beige adipocytes and leads to the up-regulation of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), a hallmark of BAT/BET [8, 9]. The third fat type is defined as white adipose tissue (WAT), which stores energy by accumulating fat droplets. WAT is needed as mechanical protection for organs and secretes cytokines and hormones. Extensive WAT formation is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk as it promotes inflammation and alters the immune-endocrine response [10]. WAT-specific gene programs typically up-regulate the zinc finger protein 423 gene (Zfp423, the murine ortholog of the human ZNF423). ZFP423 suppresses the PRDM16-mediated thermogenic program, thereby preventing fat cells from burning energy by keeping white fat cells in an energy-storing state [11]. A change in the proportions of adipose tissues occurs with aging, leading to a decline of BAT/BET and an increase in WAT, which plays a central role in cardiovascular diseases and type II diabetes [10, 12]. Development, maintenance, and activation of the different adipose tissues are guided by genetic factors and epigenetic programs, which regulate the de novo differentiation of adipocytes from progenitor cells, as well as white-to-brown adipocyte transdifferentiation [7]). However, little is known about mechanisms driving the buildup of different fat types in the heart, especially under pathophysiological conditions and whether there are sex-specific differences in these processes.

The cardiac expression and activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3 (STAT3) diminishes with age and is notably reduced in failing hearts from patients with dilatative cardiomyopathy (DCM) or peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) [1316]. Moreover, cardiomyocyte (CM)-specific deficiency of STAT3 conditional knockout (CKO) leads to age-related heart failure and more pronounced cardiac damage and failure in response to ischemic injury and infection in male mice [1719]. Nulli-pari CKO females seem to be protected from age-related heart failure but develop PPCM after breeding [14]. Beside direct protective effects on CMs, CM STAT3 influences also the cardiac cell-to-cell communication by regulating the expression and secretion of paracrine factors, impacting on endothelial cells, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells and endogenous stem cell antigen-1 (SCA-1)+ cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) [17, 2023].

The present study shows that CM-specific STAT3 deficiency leads to an up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2; also known as prostaglandinsynthase-2, PGHS-2) in young male and female CKO mice, thereby promoting the production of the prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) from arachidonic acid. In males, the prostaglandin degrading enzyme hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase (HPGD)-15 expression is under the control of the androgen receptor (AR) for which STAT3 acts as a cofactor [24]. As a consequence, PGD2 secretion from male CKO- CM but not from female CKO-CM is increased which subsequently represses the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), a histone methyltransferase associated with transcriptional repression of the white adipocyte differentiation factor ZFP423 [25]. In turn, erythropoietin (EPO), which is also reduced in CKO hearts, has been shown to enhance endothelial differentiation from CKO-CPC [22], and the present study shows that it suppresses the ZFP423 expression and white adipocyte differentiation from CKO-CPC.

In summary, STAT3-deficiency leads to sex-specific alterations in the CM secretome, which provokes an epigenetic shift in CPC differentiation from endothelial cells toward white adipocytes in male but not female CKO hearts. This process contributes to a decline in capillaries and an increase in WAT deposits with cardiac remodeling and heart failure in aging male but not female CKO mice.

Results

Male but not female CKO mice develop age-related heart failure with increased intraventricular fat accumulation and enhanced inflammation and fibrosis

We previously showed that male and female mice with a CM-specific STAT3 deficiency (alpha MHC [αMHC]-Cretg/+; STAT3flox/flox, CKO) exhibit normal cardiac function and morphology at a young age (3 months). Male but not female mice develop left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction at 6 months of age (S1 and S2 Tables) [14, 17]. As previously shown in part [14, 17], heart failure in aged male CKO mice is associated with reduced cardiac capillary density (reduced number of capillaries/CM and reduced expression of the endothelial marker vascular endothelial [VE]-cadherin), increased fibrosis (increased collagen deposits and collagen (COL) 1A1 expression) and enhanced inflammation (elevated amount of CD45 positive infiltrates and expression of the macrophage marker epidermal growth factor [EGF]-like module-containing mucin-like hormone receptor-like 1 also known as F4/80 or ADGRE1) compared with hearts from age-matched male wild-type [WT] mice (S1A–S1F Fig). Further histological analyses (Oil Red O and perilipin staining) revealed that LV adipocyte content was low with no difference between WT and CKO mice of both sexes at the age of 3 to 4 months (male: Fig 1A and 1B, female: S1H Fig). At 6 months, however, LVs from male but not female CKO mice displayed increased adipocytes content compared with age- and sex-matched controls (Fig 1A and 1B, S1H Fig). Further analyses revealed positive staining for the adipocyte marker perilipin and the white adipocyte marker resistin, while the brown/beige adipocyte marker UCP-1 could not be detected (Fig 1C, S1G Fig). In addition, the triglyceride content was higher in LV tissue from 6-month-old male CKO hearts compared with that in age-matched male WT hearts (Fig 1D).

Fig 1. Male CKO mice with age-related heart failure display increased intraventricular fat accumulation with enhanced inflammation and fibrosis.

Fig 1

(A) Oil Red O staining of adipocytes in LV cryosections counterstained with hematoxylin of 3- or 6-month-old (m) male WT or CKO mice, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Bar graph summarizes the number of adipocytes per section in 3- or 6-month-old male WT (3 m: n = 6; 6 m: n = 12) and CKO (3 m: n = 6; 6 m: n = 7) LVs, * p < 0.05 vs. WT 6 m, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of prilipin (red), resistin (red), or UCP-1 (red) counterstained with WGA-FITC (green) and DAPI (blue) in cryosections of heart tissue (male 6 m CKO mice), scale bars: 25 μM. (D) Quantification of triglyceride content in LV extracts from 6 m male WT (n = 8) and CKO (n = 7) mice, and mean of WT was set at 100%. (E and F) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of HPGD (E) in LVs of 3-month-old male WT (n = 7) and CKO mice (n = 8) and (F) in WT-CM and CKO-CM isolated from 3-month old mice (n = 6 animals per genotype). (G and H) Dot plots summarize COX-2 mRNA levels in (G) LVs of 3-month-old male WT (n = 7) and CKO mice (n = 8) and in (H) WT-CM and CKO-CM isolated from 3-month old mice (n = 6 animals per genotype). (I and J) Measurement of PGD2 levels (assessed by ELISA, normalized to αMHC mRNA levels) in supernatants of (I) male WT-CM and CKO-CM (n = 6 animals per genotype) and in supernatants of (J) isolated adult female WT-CM and CKO-CM (CM isolated and pooled from 3 WT and 2 CKO mice). (K and L) Dot plots depicting PGD2 serum levels (pg/ml) from (K) DCM male patients (N = 24) compared with healthy sex-matched controls (N = 29) and from (L) DCM females (N = 15) and healthy female controls (N = 31). (B–J) All data are mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT, 2-tailed unpaired t test. (K and L) * p < 0.05 vs ctrl, Mann Whitney U test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; COX, cyclooxygenase; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; LV, left ventricular; m, male; PG, prostaglandin; UCP-1, uncoupling protein 1; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; WT, wild-type; αMHC, alpha MHC.

COX-2 expression is increased in male and female CKO cardiomyocytes but reduced HPGD expression and increased PGD2 secretion are only present in male cardiomyocytes

Molecular analyses revealed a sex-specific difference in the expression of the prostaglandin (PG) degrading enzyme HPGD, with less expression in LV tissue from 3- and 6-month-old CKO male mice compared with that from WT male mice (Fig 1E, S2A Fig), while no such difference was visible between CKO and WT female mice (S2B and S2C Fig). Moreover, HPGD expression was also lower in male CKO-CM compared with that in male WT-CM (Fig 1F), while female CKO-CM and WT-CM showed no difference (S2D Fig). COX-2 plays an important role for the synthesis of PGs. Increased COX-2 expression was observed in LV tissue of 3- and 6-month-old male and female CKO mice and in isolated male and female CMs from young (3-month-old) CKO mice compared with respective sex- and age-matched WT controls (Fig 1G and 1H, S2E–S2H Fig). Furthermore, levels of PGD2 were increased in the supernatants of isolated male CKO-CM but not in female CKO-CM compared with sex-matched WT-CM (Fig 1I and 1J).

LV tissue from male patients with end-stage heart failure display higher cardiac CEBPA expression and lower HPGD expression compared with non-failing LV samples from healthy male organ donors

We previously showed that STAT3 is reduced in hearts from patients with end-stage heart failure (15). Here, we observed that LV tissue from male patients with end-stage heart failure due to DCM or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 8) displayed higher mRNA levels of the adipocyte marker CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) (+133 ± 142%, P < 0.05) and a nonsignificant trend to higher COX-2 (+33 ± 91%, not significant) mRNA levels compared with LV samples from healthy male organ donors (n = 6). In addition, HPGD mRNA levels were significantly lower in male failing LV samples (−55 ± 12%, P < 0.05) compared with LV samples from healthy male organ donors.

Serum levels of PGD2 are increased in male patients with heart failure but not in female patients with heart failure

Male patients with heart failure due to idiopathic DCM showed elevated PGD2 serum levels compared with serum from healthy age-matched males, whereas PGD2 serum levels from females with heart failure due to DCM showed no difference compared with serum from healthy age-matched females (Fig 1K and 1L; clinical data of this cohort are shown in S3 Table).

HPGD is reduced and COX-2 increased in STAT3-KD HL-1 cardiomyocytes and both effects are enhanced by testosterone but not by estrogen

It has been reported that HPGD is positively regulated by the AR (26) and that the AR is expressed by HL-1 CMs [27]. We observed that HPGD expression was significantly lower in PBS-incubated HL-1 CMs with a lentiviral STAT3-knockdown (KD) (HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM) compared with PBS-incubated control HL-1 (HL-1-ctrl-CM (S3A and S3B Fig). Testosterone stimulation markedly induced HPGD in HL-1-ctrl-CM (+68 ± 16%), which was attenuated in HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM (+29 ± 9%) (S3B Fig). In turn, COX-2 was higher in HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM without an additional effect of testosterone treatment compared with that HL-1-ctrl-CM (S3C Fig). The treatment with estrogen did not influence HPGD or COX-2 expression of HL-1-ctrl-CM or HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM (S3D and S3E Fig).

CPC isolated from young male CKO mice display increased adipocyte differentiation potential compared with CPC isolated from young male WT mice

Next, we evaluated the differentiation potential of freshly isolated CPC from young WT and CKO male mice for which we previously showed that STAT3 is exclusively deleted in CMs of CKO mice, while its expression is comparable in CPC from CKO (CKO-CPC) and WT mice (22). Freshly isolated CPC showed marked expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) indicative for their mesenchymal stem cell character (Fig 2A and 2B). The lack of preadipocyte factor 1 (PREF-1, highly expressed in the preadipocyte cell line 3T3-L1) expression in CPC confirms that isolated CPC were not contaminated with preadipocytes (Fig 2A and 2B). In vitro cultivation led to spontaneous differentiation into various cell types including endothelial cells and adipocytes, as shown previously [22] (Fig 2C and 2D). The spontaneous adipocyte differentiation was 2-fold higher in male CKO-CPC compared with that in male WT-CPC, despite identical cultivation conditions (Fig 2D and 2E), while no elevated adipocyte differentiation was observed in female WT-CPC and CKO-CPC. After differentiation, male CKO-CPC displayed an up-regulation of the general adipocyte markers CEBPA and fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) (Fig 2F and 2G), and WAT markers ZFP423, lysozyme 2 (LYZ2), and resistin (Fig 2H–2J). The expression of the BAT/BET markers EBF transcription factor-2 (EBF2) and transmembrane protein 26 (TMEM26) was similar in CKO-CPC and WT-CPC (Fig 2K and 2L) and the BAT/BET markers PRDM16 and UCP-1 could not be detected.

Fig 2. Characterization and adipocyte formation of cultivated CPC isolated from young CKO and WT male mice with normal cardiac function.

Fig 2

(A) Flow cytometry (PDGFRα or PREF-1: black; IgG control: red) and (B) qRT-PCR analysis of PDGFRα and PREF-1 in freshly isolated male WT-CPC, n = 3 independent isolations (each isolation consists of 8 to 12 animals). The preadipocyte cell line 3T3-L1 served as a positive and GAPDH as a loading control. (C) IB4 staining of WT-CPC after 4 weeks in culture (IB4, green; DAPI, blue; scale bar: 100 μm). (D) Oil Red O staining visualizes spontaneous differentiation of adipocytes in WT-CPC and CKO-CPC after 4 weeks of cultivation, scale bars: 50 μm. (E) Bar graph summarizing adipocyte counts of Oil Red O positive cells (n = 5 independent isolations; each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (F–H) qRT-PCR detects mRNA levels of adipocyte markers (F) CEBPA, (G) FABP4, and (H) ZFP423 after 4 weeks of cultivation in WT-CPC and CKO-CPC (n = 5 (F and G) and n = 3 (H), independent cell isolations; each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (I and J) qRT-PCR detects mRNA levels of WAT markers (I) LYZ2 and (J) resistin after in vitro cultivation in WT-CPC and CKO-CPC (n = 3 isolations per genotype). (K and L) qRT-PCR detects mRNA levels of BAT/BET markers (K) EBF2 and (L) TMEM26 after in vitro cultivation in WT-CPC and CKO-CPC (n = 3 isolations per genotype). (E–L) Bar graphs represent mean ± SD, mean of WT was set at 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT, 1 sample t test. Underlying data can be found in S1S8 Data and S9 and S10 Figs. BAT, brown adipose tissue; BET, beige adipose tissue; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CKO, conditional knockout; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IB4, isolectin B4; PDGFRα, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha; PREF-1, preadipocyte factor 1; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26; WAT, white adipose tissue; WT, wild-type.

The epigenetic signature of freshly isolated CPC isolated from young CKO males differs from CPC isolated from young WT males

Since adipocyte priming of CKO-CPC was maintained during in vitro cultivation, we analyzed the epigenetic profiles of CKO-CPC and WT-CPC freshly isolated from 3-month-old male mice with normal cardiac function (S1 Table). A genome-wide exploratory methylation profiling by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) revealed a total of 83 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) overlapping with 81 unique genes with a minimum group methylation difference of 0.1 and p < 0.001 (S4A Fig, accession number PRJNA602737). DMRs with hypermethylated regions were detected in genes such as Epas1 and Fgfr2, both known to promote angiogenesis [28, 29] (S4A Fig, Fig 3A and 3B). In turn, regions in the vicinity of the Zfp423 5-UTR (in exon 2, chr8: 87783293–87783352, Wilcoxon p < 5.5 × 10−6) were hypomethylated in CKO-CPC compared with WT-CPC (S4A Fig, Fig 3C). Zfp423 expression is negatively regulated by zinc finger protein 521 (ZFP521) (30), which was slightly hypermethylated in CKO-CPC (Wilcoxon p < 0.02; S4A Fig, Fig 3D). Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed higher mRNA expression of ZFP423 in CKO-CPC compared with that in WT-CPC, while no difference was observed for ZFP521 expression (Fig 3E and 3F). Zfp423 expression can also be regulated by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)2 and BMP4 [30, 31], but no differences were detected in the methylation pattern of these genes, and the mRNA expression of BMP2 and BMP4 in LV heart tissue taken from CKO and WT male mice was similar (Fig 3G and 3H). The mRNA levels of the EZH2 subunit of the PRC2, a histone methyltransferase associated with transcriptional repression of ZFP423 (25), was reduced in freshly isolated CKO-CPC compared with WT-CPC from male mice (Fig 3I). In turn, no alteration in EZH2 or ZFP423 mRNA levels as observed in CKO- and WT-CPC isolated from 3-month-old female mice (Fig 3J and 3K).

Fig 3. Epigenetic analysis of freshly isolated CKO- and WT-CPC.

Fig 3

(A and B) Boxplots with single CpG methylation values for (A) Epas1 (chr17:86759066–86759095) and (B) Fgfr2 (chr7:130728553–130728597). (C) Boxplot with single CpG methylation values in a region overlapping with the 5′-UTR of exon 2 of Zfp423 in CKO-CPC and WT-CPC (chr8: 87783293–87783352). Each group contains 3 samples with methylation values for 6 CpGs within the indicated genomic interval, respectively (n = 18). (D) Boxplot with single CpG methylation of a region approximately 1.5 kb downstream of the second exon of Zfp521 in CKO-CPC and WT-CPC (chr18:13969640–13969667). For each of the 3 samples per group, 3 CpG methylation values in the identified region (n = 9) are shown. (E and F) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels detected by qRT-PCR of (E) ZFP423 and (F) ZFP521 in freshly isolated WT-CPC and CKO-CPC (n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 animals). (G and H) Dot plots summarize (G) BMP2 and (H) BMP4 mRNA levels of WT (n = 7) and CKO (n = 8) LVs. (I) Bar graph summarizes EZH2 mRNA levels detected by qRT-PCR in freshly isolated WT-CPC and CKO-CPC from 3-month-old male (n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 animals). (J and K) Bar graphs summarize (J) EZH2 and (K) ZFP423 mRNA levels detected by qRT-PCR in freshly isolated CPC from 3-month-old female WT and CKO mice (CPC isolated and pooled from 3 WT and 2 CKO mice). (A–D) Differences in methylation values were tested by Wilcoxon test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001. (E–K) Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the mean of WT was set to 100%, * p < 0.05 vs. control, ** p < 0.01 vs. control; (E, F, I–K) 1 sample t test and (G and H) 2-tailed unpaired t test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; WT, wild-type.

Clonally expanded CPC have the potential to differentiate into endothelial cells and white adipocytes

As freshly isolated CPC are generally a heterogenic pool of cells [22], we tested whether the same CPC progenitor cell can differentiate into endothelial cells and adipocytes depending on the microenvironment. Using 2 clonally expanded CPC (cCPC) cell lines [22, 32], we observed that the same passage of cCPC cell lines differentiate into endothelial cells on Matrigel [22, 32] or into adipocytes when adipocyte differentiation media and the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) activator indomethacin [33] were added (S5A and S5B Fig). Adipocyte differentiation led to a reduction in SCA-1 and PDGFRα expression and an up-regulation of the general adipocyte markers CEBPA and FABP4 (S5C–S5F Fig). Further analyses showed the up-regulation of the WAT markers LYZ2 and resistin, while the expression of the BAT/BET markers EBF2 and TMEM26 remained unchanged (S5G–S5J Fig), and PRDM16 and UCP-1 were undetectable.

Retroviral overexpression of ZFP423 induced white adipocyte differentiation in cCPC

Retroviral overexpression of ZFP423 induced white adipocyte differentiation in cCPC as shown by increased Oil Red O staining and enhanced expression of PPARG2, CEBPA, LYZ2, and resistin (S6A–S6G Fig). The expression of the BAT/BET markers EBF2 and TMEM26 remained unchanged (S6H and S6I Fig), and PRDM16 and UCP-1 were not detectable.

PGD2 promotes white adipocyte differentiation of isolated WT-CPC

In order to analyze whether enhanced PGD2 is responsible for increased white adipocyte formation in male CKO hearts, isolated WT-CPC were incubated with PGD2, which induced white adipocyte differentiation (Fig 4A and 4B). This was associated with an early reduction of EZH2 and enhanced ZFP423 expression (Fig 4C and 4D). During cultivation, PGD2 also enhanced expression levels of the adipocyte markers PPARG2, CEBPA, and FABP4 and of the WAT markers ZFP423, LYZ2, and resistin, while the expression of BAT/BET markers (EBF2 and TMEM26) remained unchanged (Fig 4E–4L), and PRDM16 and UCP-1 expression were not detectable.

Fig 4. PGD2 promotes white adipocyte differentiation of male WT-CPC.

Fig 4

(A) Representative picture after Oil Red O staining of isolated WT-CPC treated with PGD2 (1 μM) for 48 h and cultivated for 12 days, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (C and D) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (C) EZH2 and (D) ZFP423 in WT-CPC after treatment with PGD2 for 48 h. (E-H) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (E) ZFP423, (F) PPARG2, (G) CEBPA, and (H) FABP4 in WT-CPC incubated with PGD2 (1 μM) for 48 h and cultivated for 12 days. (I–L) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of the white adipocyte markers (I) LYZ2 and (J) resistin and of the brown/beige adipocyte markers (K) EBF2 and (L) TMEM26 in WT-CPC incubated with PGD2 (1 μM). (C, D, I–L) Data are presented as mean ± SD (WT-CPC isolated and pooled from 6 animals), and the mean of control cells was set to 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control, 1 sample t test. (B, E–H) Data are presented as mean ± SD (WT-CPC isolated and pooled from 3 animals), mean of control cells was set to 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control, 1 sample t test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; LYZ2, lysozyme 2; PGD2, prostaglandin D2; PPARG2, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma isoform-2; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26; WT, wild-type.

PGD2-induced adipocyte differentiation in cCPC that could be prevented by the PGD2 receptor 2 antagonist BAY-u 3405 but not by the PGD2 receptor 1 antagonist BWA868C

The treatment of cCPC with PGD2-induced adipocyte differentiation (Fig 5A and 5H). The PGD2-induced adipocyte differentiation in cCPC could be attenuated by the PGD2 receptor (DP)2 antagonist BAY-u 3405, while incubation with the DP1 receptor antagonist BWA868C did not influence PGD2-induced ZFP423 expression or adipocyte differentiation (Fig 5A–5H).

Fig 5. PGD2 induced adipocyte differentiation from cCPC is abrogated by DP2 antagonist BAY-u 3405 but not by the DP1 antagonist BWA868C.

Fig 5

Bar graphs summarizes (A) EZH2 mRNA expression and (B) ZFP423 mRNA expression of cCPC 48 h after treatment with the DP1 receptor antagonist BWA868C or the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 in indicated concentrations (1 μM and 10 μM) and PGD2 stimulation (100 μM). (C) Representative pictures after Oil Red O staining of cCPC treated with DP receptor antagonists BWA868C (10 μM) or BAY-u 3405 (10 μM) and PGD2 (100 μM) for 48 h and cultivated for 12 days, scale bars: 50 μm. (D) Relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (E–H) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (E) ZFP423, (F) PPARG2, (G) CEBPA and (H) FABP4 in cCPC incubated with DP receptor antagonists and PGD2 (100 μM) for 48 h and cultivated for 12 days. Statistically significant differences between the groups are represented as mean ± SD, n = 3 independent experiments, and the mean of mRNA expression levels of control cCPC were set at 100%, ** p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, * p < 0.05 vs. ctrl, ## p < 0.01 vs. PGD2 and DMSO-treated cCPC, # p < 0.05 vs. PGD2 and DMSO-treated cCPC, 1 sample t test). Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cCPC, clonally expanded CPC; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; DP, PGD2 receptor; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; PGD2, prostaglandin D2; PPARG2, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma isoform-2; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

PGD2 induced adipocyte differentiation from human iPSC

PGD2 treatment for 48 h reduced EZH2 expression and increased ZNF423 expression in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) (S7A and S7B Fig). Prolonged treatment with PGD2 induced also white adipocyte differentiation of iPSC (resistin and Oil Red O staining, S7C and S7D Fig). In addition, ZNF423 and CEBPA expressions were elevated, and EZH2 expression was reduced in PGD2-treated human iPSC compared with control iPSC (S7F–S7H Fig). All aspects of adipocyte differentiation induced by PGD2 in iPSC could be attenuated by BAY-u 3405 (S7E–S7H Fig).

Treatment of young male CKO mice with the COX-inhibitor Ibuprofen or the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 reduced adipocyte differentiation of CKO-CPC

In order to evaluate whether PGD2 is responsible for the enhanced adipocyte differentiation potential of CPC in CKO male mice, young male CKO mice before heart failure onset were treated either with the COX-inhibitor Ibuprofen or the DP2 antagonist BAY-u 3405 in vivo. After 2 weeks of treatment, PGD2 levels were reduced in the supernatants of isolated CKO-CM of Ibuprofen but not BAY-u 3405-treated CKO mice compared with levels in the supernatants of CKO-CM isolated from control CKO mice (Fig 6A and 6B). CKO-CPC isolated from Ibuprofen- or BAY-u 3405-treated CKO mice displayed enhanced EZH2 expression and reduced ZFP423 expression compared with control CKO-CPC (Fig 6C–6F). The spontaneous adipocyte differentiation of CKO-CPC isolated from Ibuprofen or BAY-u 3405-treated CKO mice was abolished compared with CKO-CPC isolated from untreated CKO mice (Fig 6G and 6H).

Fig 6. Ibuprofen and BAY-u 3405 treatment of young male CKO mice enhanced EZH2 expression and reduced ZFP423 expression.

Fig 6

(A and B) Dot plots summarize PGD2 levels in supernatants of CKO-CM isolated from young male CKO mice treated with Ibuprofen (A) or BAY-u 3405 (B) for 2 weeks and in supernatants of control CKO-CM. CKO-CM were isolated from 6 CKO mice treated with Ibuprofen and 6 respective control mice or 6 CKO mice treated with BAY-u 3405 and respective 4 control mice. (C and D) Bar graphs summarize mRNA expression of EZH2 of CKO-CPC isolated from (C) Ibuprofen-treated CKO mice and from control CKO mice or (D) BAY-u 3405-treated CKO mice and from control CKO mice. CKO-CPC isolated and pooled from 6 CKO mice treated with Ibuprofen and 6 respective control mice or 6 CKO mice treated with BAY-u 3405 and respective 4 control mice. (E and F) Bar graphs summarize mRNA expression of ZFP423 of CKO-CPC isolated from (E) Ibuprofen-treated CKO mice and from control CKO mice or (F) BAY-u 3405-treated CKO mice and from control CKO mice. CKO-CPC isolated and pooled from 6 CKO mice treated with Ibuprofen and 6 respective control mice or 6 CKO mice treated with BAY-u 3405 and respective 4 control mice. (G and H) Representative pictures after Oil Red O staining visualizing spontaneous differentiation of adipocytes in CKO-CPC after 4 weeks of cultivation. CKO-CPC isolated and pooled from 6 CKO mice treated with (G) Ibuprofen and 6 respective control mice or 6 CKO mice treated with (H) BAY-u 3405 and respective 4 control mice. scale bars: 50 μm. (A–F) Data are presented as mean ± SD, mean of CKO control was set to 100%, * p < 0.05 vs. control, ** p <0.01 vs. control; (A and B) 2-tailed unpaired t test and (C–F) 1 sample ttest. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; PGD2, prostaglandin D2.

EPO reduces ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation of CKO-CPC

We previously demonstrated that the addition of recombinant murine (rm)EPO to CKO-CPC cultures restored their endothelial differentiation potential (22). Here, we observed that addition of rmEPO to CKO cultures persistently reduced the ZFP423 expression in CKO-CPC (S8A and S8B Fig), which was associated with attenuated adipocyte differentiation, as shown by reduced Oil Red O positive cells and reduced expression of CEBPA and FABP4 (S8C–S8F Fig). However, the addition of rmEPO to isolated CPC for 48 h had no effect on EZH2 expression (S8G Fig).

Discussion

CM-specific STAT3-deficiency in male but not female mice leads to age-related heart failure [14, 17]. Here, we provide evidence that this is caused in part by an impaired AR receptor signaling due to STAT3 deficiency, which leads to a higher secretion of PGD2 by male but not female CKO-CM (Fig 7). PGD2 subsequently induces an epigenetic shift of CPC differentiation from endothelial cells to white adipocytes, thereby promoting WAT deposits in hearts from aging male but not female CKO mice (Fig 7). The shift of CPC toward adipocyte differentiation could be attenuated by the treatment of CKO mice with the COX inhibitor Ibuprofen or the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405, thereby confirming the role of PGD2 for cardiac WAT generation in vivo. Since WAT generation is associated with more severe heart failure (6), these data shed light on sex-specific remodeling processes in the heart that may contribute to age-related heart failure in males.

Fig 7. Scheme explaining how CM STAT3-deficiency leads to enhanced white adipocyte differentiation of CPC in male mice contributing to sex-specific cardiac remodeling.

Fig 7

The present scheme shows in the upper picture (Fig 7A) the WT male and in the lower picture the CKO male cardiac signaling (Fig 7B). Sex-specific regulated pathways with dark red arrows and sex-unspecific regulated pathways with black arrows. CM-specific deficiency of STAT3 (Fig 7B) leads to enhanced expression of COX-2 in male and female mice whereas expression of HPGD is only reduced in male mice likely to result from impaired male-specific hormonal-mediated AR signaling caused by the missing AR cofactor STAT3 in male CKO-CM. This results in increased secretion of PGD2 and of its metabolite PGJ2 only in male CKO-CM. Subsequently, elevated PGD2 levels in the cardiac microenvironment via activation of PGD2-RT2 reduced the expression of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase in CPC leading to reduced DNA methylation of its target gene Zfp423 and with this to enhanced ZFP423 expression. ZFP423 promotes white and suppresses brown/beige adipocyte differentiation of CPC in male CKO hearts. Reduced secretion of EPO from CKO-CM lowers the endothelial differentiation potential of CPC [22] which is associated with hypermethylation of the angiogenic genes Epas1 and Fgfr2. In addition, to the previously shown beneficial effect of treatment of CKO mice with the EPO derivative CERA for endothelial differentiation (22), here we show that EPO also attenuates Zfp423 expression in CKO-CPC. Moreover, treatments of CKO mice with the COX inhibitor Ibuprofen or the PGD2-RT2 antagonist BAY-u 3405 suppress ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation in CKO-CPC, thereby attenuating the endothelial-to-adipocyte shift of CPC. AR, androgen receptor; CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; COX, cyclooxygenase; EPO, erythropoietin; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; PGD2, prostaglandin D2; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3.

PGD2 is generated by multiple enzymatic steps from arachidonic acid, and COX-2 is a rate-limiting enzyme in this process [34]. COX-2 is elevated in CM from female and male CKO mice, an observation that contrasts with findings showing that STAT3 is a direct transcription factor of COX-2 in ischemic preconditioning, where the activation of cardiac STAT3 up-regulates COX-2 in the heart [35]. In fact, beneficial effects of COX-2 in protection of the heart from ischemic injury have been reported also indicating that the use of COX inhibitors may have adverse effects in the setting of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) [36]. In contrast, protective effects of COX-2 inhibition on CMs have also been reported [37]. The present study analyzes pathomechanisms of age-related idiopathic or DCM for which pathomechanisms are different from myocardial infarction or I/R injury as, for example, canonical STAT3 signaling is not or only moderately activated. Our data suggest that inactive STAT3 acts either directly or indirectly as a negative regulator of COX-2, a feature that will be explored in future studies. However, PGs are regulated not only by COX enzymes but also by the PG-degrading enzyme HPGD [38], and here we observed the lower expression of HPGD in male CKO-CM but not in female CKO-CM. In this context, it has been shown that the AR can be activated by different ligands including interleukin (IL)-6 and testosterone [39]. The AR is expressed in CMs from various species including mouse and human [26,40,41], and STAT3 acts as a positive cofactor for AR signaling by directly interacting with amino acids 234 to 558 in the N-terminal domain of the AR [24]. The AR is expressed on HL-1 cells, and indeed, HPGD expression is lower in HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM compared with that in HL-1-ctrl-CM. Moreover, testosterone induced a marked increase in HPGD in HL-1-ctrl-CM, which was blunted in HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM. Thus, both enhanced COX-2 and sex-specific lowered HPGD production finally contribute to enhanced PGD2 production in STAT3-deficient male CMs. This deregulated arachidonic metabolism results in enhanced PGD2 production in CMs which could also be confirmed in vivo as the treatment of CKO male mice with the COX-inhibitor Ibuprofen lowering the PGD2 secretion in CKO-CM. Thus, we provide evidence that enhanced COX-2 and sex-specific reduced HPGD contribute to elevated PGD2 production in male failure prone and failing hearts with low STAT3 expression (Fig 7).

A consequence of the enhanced cardiac PGD2 secretion is an impairment of the endogenous cardiac regeneration potential as it shifts the differentiation potential of the CPC pool from endothelial cells toward white adipocytes. Indeed, isolated CKO-CPC display enhanced white adipocyte and reduced endothelial differentiation. Furthermore, depending on the differentiation conditions, cCPC can differentiate into endothelial cells or into adipocytes. These data indicate that not differences in the CPC populations but reduced STAT3 expression in CMs and subsequent impairment of the cardiac microenvironment, i.e., enhanced PGD2 secretion and the previously reported reduced EPO secretion (22) promote the shift in their differentiation potential. The contribution of PGD2 in this process is demonstrated by the observations that PGD2 is able to induce white adipocyte differentiation in WT-CPC, in cCPC and in human iPSC. The white adipocyte formation by PGD2 is mediated by the DP2 receptor since it could be inhibited by the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 but not by the DP1 receptor antagonist BWA868C. Moreover, since the treatment of CKO mice with the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 reduced the enhanced adipocyte formation of CKO-CPC, the role of PGD2 via its DP2 receptor for the formation of WAT could also be confirmed in vivo.

The effect of increased PGD2 on CPC appears to be longstanding, since isolated CKO-CPC from CKO male hearts maintain their increased white adipocyte differentiation capacity even if kept for several weeks under the same cultivation conditions as WT-CPC isolated from WT hearts.

Indeed, freshly isolated CKO-CPC or PGD2-treated WT-CPC displayed an increased expression of the white adipocyte differentiation factor ZFP423. ZFP423 is a transcription factor controlling preadipocyte determination and maintenance of white adipocyte identity through suppression of the thermogenic gene program [8,10,12,42,43]. ZFP423 overexpression in cCPC was sufficient to induce white adipocyte differentiation confirming the important role of ZFP423 for the adipocyte commitment of CPC. Increased ZFP423 expression in male CKO-CPC was associated with an up-regulation of WAT markers (LYZ2 and resistin) and either unchanged expression (EBF2 and TMEM26) or no expression (PRDM16 and UCP-1) of BAT/BET markers. Finally, and in line with the sex-specific difference in PGD2 production, CPC isolated from female CKO hearts did neither exhibit increased ZFP423 expression nor enhanced adipocyte differentiation.

BMP2, BMP4, and ZFP521 are known regulators of ZFP423, and ZFP521 suppresses the adipocyte lineage by direct transcriptional repression of ZFP423 [30,31]. In the present study, expressions of BMP2, BMP4, or ZFP521 were not altered in male CKO hearts or in freshly isolated male CKO-CPC compared with male WT hearts or WT-CPC, suggesting that these factors are not responsible for the ZFP423 regulation in male CKO-CPC. In turn, PGD2 and its nonenzymatically generated metabolite 15-deoxy-delta(12,14)-prostaglandin-J2 (PGJ2) were reported to decrease EZH2 mRNA and protein expression [44]. EZH2 is a subunit of PRC2 and functions as a histone methyltransferase that is able to control CpG methylation through direct physical contact with DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) [45]. Reduced EZH2 levels in the Zfp423 promoter are associated with lower histone and DNA methylation and higher expression of the Zfp423 gene, which predisposes fetal progenitor cells to adipogenic differentiation [46]. Indeed, in freshly isolated male CKO-CPC, the EZH2 expression was reduced and several DMRs were hypomethylated in the ZFP423 gene compared with male WT-CPC. The role of PGD2 for this epigenetic switch of CPC is supported by the observation that PGD2 stimulation of isolated WT-CPC reduced EZH2 expression and increased ZFP423 expression. In addition, the treatment of young male CKO mice with the COX inhibitor Ibuprofen not only reduced the release of PGD2 from CMs but also enhanced EZH2 and reduced ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation in isolated CKO-CPC. Similarly, the treatment of CKO mice with the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 increased EZH2 and reduced ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation in CKO-CPC further confirming the role of PGD2 for the epigenetic switch of CPC toward adipocyte differentiation. Taken together, these observations extend previous studies reporting that PGD2 suppresses lipolysis in adipocytes and is associated with insulin resistance and body weight gain [47]. This novel aspect of PGD2 is interesting with regard to the controversial roles of PGD2 documented for the cardiovascular system. In fact, it has been shown that PGD2 not only has protective features for example in I/R injury [48] but may also have adverse effects, for example, by inducing CM death [49] and/or vasoconstriction [50].

Beside the hypomethylated Zfp423 gene, male CKO-CPC displayed hypermethylated DMRs in genes promoting angiogenesis (for example, Epas1 and Fgfr2 [28, 29]) consistent with their previously shown lower endothelial differentiation potential [22]. Previous data showed that EPO secretion is reduced in the cardiac microenvironment from male CKO hearts and exogenous EPO restored the endothelial differentiation capacity in male CKO-CPC [22]. The present study found that EPO reduced ZFP423 expression and adipocyte formation from CKO-CPC, suggesting that lower EPO levels in CKO hearts may further promote the shift from endothelial to adipocyte differentiation in CKO-CPC. So far, there is no evidence for a sex-specific regulation of EPO since EPO blood levels in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy remained unchanged [51].

Previous data reported reduced STAT3 in failing human hearts [15], and the present study reveals significantly lower HPGD expression in LV tissue from male patients with terminal heart failure. Moreover, male patients but not female patients with heart failure due to DCM displayed elevated PGD2 serum levels suggesting that sex-specific enhanced PGD2 are also present in humans with heart failure. Furthermore, since PGD2 induced ZFP423 expression and adipocyte differentiation in human iPSC, PGD2 may also shift the differentiation potential of human tissue progenitor cells toward WAT formation.

In conclusion, age-related reduction of CM STAT3 leads to impaired AR receptor signaling and subsequent reduced expression of the PG-degrading enzyme HPGD (Fig 7). This results in a sex-specific increased secretion of PGD2 from CMs in male but not female hearts (Fig 7). Subsequently, PGD2 induces an epigenetic shift in CPC already prior to heart failure, which may hamper vascular regeneration and increase WAT deposits, thereby promoting adverse remodeling and heart failure (Fig 7). Finally, the present data suggest that the COX inhibitor Ibuprofen or the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 may attenuate these remodeling process and, with this, reduce age-related heart failure specifically in males with impaired AR signaling.

Limitation to this study: Although, we could show that COX inhibition and more specifically inhibition of the PGD2 receptor DP2 prevents the enhanced white adipocyte formation of CPC in failure prone CKO male hearts, we have not performed chronic treatment with COX inhibitors or BAY-u 3405 to test whether they would have an impact on age-related heart failure of the DCM phenotype.

Material and methods

Unless otherwise stated, chemicals and reagents were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

Ethics statement—Humans

The local ethics committee of Hannover Medical School approved this study. All patients provided written informed consent. The study conforms to the principles outlined in the declaration of Helsinki.

The study was approved by the MHH local ethic committee (Nr. 1833–2013).

The generation of iPSC cells was approved by the MHH local ethic committee (Nr. 3242–2016).

Ethic statement—Animals

All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the German animal protection law and with European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC and 2010/63/EU for the protection of animals used for experimental purposes. All experiments were approved by the Local Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee and permitted by the relevant local authority for animal protection “Niedersächisisches Landesamt für Verbrauerschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit” (LAVES), application numbers 33.9-42502-04-08/1558,11/0552, 19/3328).

Animal experiments

Mice with a CM-restricted knockout of STAT3 (CKO: αMHC-Cretg/+; STAT3flox/flox) and WT mice (STAT3flox/flox) were generated as previously described [17]. Echocardiography was performed on 3- and 6-month-old lightly sedated mice (isoflurane inhalation 0.5%) using a Vevo 770 (VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada) as described (14).

Ibuprofen and BAY-u 3405 treatment of CKO mice

Male CKO mice in the age of 9 to 10 weeks were treated with Ibuprofen (10 mg/kg bodyweight, Ibuprofen sodium salt, Sigma-Aldrich, dissolved in drinking water) or BAY-u 3405 (10 mg/kg bodyweight, Ramatroban, medchemexpress (Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, United States of America), dissolved in drinking water) for 2 weeks. CKO control animals received drinking water.

Histology and immunostaining

For cardiac morphological analyses, hearts were embedded in Tissue Tek OCT and frozen at −80°C. Interstitial collagen was analyzed in picro-sirius red F3BA-stained sections [17,52]. Inflammation was determined in LV cryosections with an antibody recognizing CD45 (BD Pharmingen 550539, BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA). Capillary density was determined in transversely sectioned LVs by isolectin B4 (Vector, Burlingame, California, USA), counterstained with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA, Vector) and DAPI for nuclear stain [14,52]. For immunostainings using primary antibody recognizing perilipin (#9349, Cell Signaling Technologys, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA), resistin (ab119501, abcam, Cambridge, UK) or UCP-1 (ab10983, abcam, Cambridge, UK) cryosections were fixed in acetone, were washed 3 times with PBS, and blocked with 10% donkey serum and 0.3% Triton in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cryosections were stained with perilipin antibody (1:100), resistin antibody (1:50), or UCP-1 antibody (1:100) overnight at 4°C. Cryosections were washed 3 times, and incubation with the secondary antibody Cy3-anti-rabbit (1,250, Jackson ImmunoResearch, Newmarket, Pennsylvania, USA) and counterstaining with WGA were performed for 2 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with DAPI Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Images were acquired with AxioVert200M microscope, Axiovison software 4.8, Axio Observer 7, and Zen 2.6 pro software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and with SP8 Leica Inverted confocal microscope.

Isolation, characterization, and culture of SCA-1+ cardiac progenitor cells

Isolation of SCA-1+ cells from hearts of 3-month-old mice was performed as described previously [22] and is described in detail in S1 Text.

DNA Isolation for RRBS

The DNA of freshly isolated CKO-CPC and WT-CPC of 3-month-old male mice was prepared using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands).

Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS)

RRBS libraries for a total of n = 6 samples (3 sample pools for CKO mice, 3 sample pools for WT mice, 10 to 12 mice per pool) were prepared using the Ovation RRBS Methyl-Seq System 1–16 with TrueMethyl oxBS (NuGen, Redwood City, California, USA), skipping the oxidation step but otherwise undertaken according to manufacturer’s instructions. The average conversion rate across all samples was estimated to be 97%. Sequencing was performed on a NextSeq500 instrument at the Sequencing Core Facility of the Fritz-Lipmann-Institute Jena. The input DNA and concentration used for library preparation are both given in Table A in S1 Text.

Data analysis of RRBS

Preprocessing

Sequencing yielded between 139M and 171M sequences (Table 1). After clipping using cutadapt [53] (version 1.18; parameters: quality cutoff, 20; overlap, 5: minimum length, 25; -u 7 -a AGATCGGAAGAGC), between 138M and 170M remained (Table 1). Before and after clipping, the quality was inspected using fastqc (v0.11.5).

Table 1. Read numbers and mapping statistics.
Sample Raw reads Clipped reads mapping
Set1 CKO 171274320 170175455 152837610 (89.81%)
Set1 WT 147258040 146432432 131141572 (89.56%)
Set2 CKO 143418782 142616983 127924806 (89.7%)
Set2 WT 139188392 138358371 123566916 (89.31%)
Set3 CKO 158225479 157255130 141428776 (89.94%)
Set3 WT 157426725 156389740 140337521 (89.74%)

CKO, conditional knockout; WT, wild-type.

Read alignment and conversion rates

Using the Bisulfite Analysis Toolkit (BAT; v.0.1) [5456], reads were aligned with segemehl (v0.2.0) [54] to the Mus musculus reference genome GRChm38.p6 using standard parameters of the module “BAT_calling” in mode “-F 1.” For the extraction of conversion rates, we used the module “BAT_calling” with haarz (v0.1.7) [54, 56] and samtools (v1.6). The filtering of resulting vcf files containing the conversion rates was done using the module “BAT_filter_vcf.” On average, mapping rates were approximately 89% (Table A in S1 Text).

Calling of differentially methylated regions

The methylation data obtained from the previous step was summarized using “BAT_summarize” after the adaptation of the source code to allow the processing of mice data (BAT_summarize_mouse). Specifically, the module was called by assigning all 3 WT samples to the control group and all 3 CKO samples to the case group (parameters—in1 Set1_WT_CPC.bedgraph, Set2_WT_CPC.bedgraph, Set3_WT_CPC.bedgraph—in2 Set1_CKO_CPC.bedgraph, Set2_CKO_CPC.bedgraph, Set3_CKO_CPC.bedgraph—groups control, case—h1 WT1, WT2, WT3—h2 CKO1, CKO2, CKO3). The module was run with circos [57] (v0.69–6) and bedGraphToBigWig (v4). The calling of differentially methylated regions was carried out with “BAT_DMRcalling” using metilene (v0.2–8; parameters -a control -b case -z “-m 3 -M 1000 -d 0.01 -v 0.0” -p 1 -d 0.01 -c 3) [58]. In order to increase the sensitivity in the given setup, the minimum amount of CpGs per DMR was reduced to 3, and the distance between CpGs within 1 DMR was increased to 1 kb. Subsequently, the raw metilene output was annotated with the extended ENSEMBL annotation for GRCm38.p6 (v.92) using bedtools intersect (v2.22.1) [59]. For the extension of the gene annotation, all annotated genes were extended at their 5′-end by 5 kb to include the promoter region.

A total of 5 DMRs with an false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p-value were reported. Due to the high homogeneity of the samples and the relatively small size, we decided to analyze 2 sets of regions filtered for 2 different unadjusted p-value criteria. The first set with a minimum group methylation difference of 0.1 and p < 0.001 yielded a total of 83 DMRs overlapping with 81 unique genes. To better inspect the CpG methylation within predicted DMRs (n = 83), we calculated the median methylation for the respective DMRs for each sample and visualized the data using R’s pheatmap function (R version 3.4.1, pheatmap version 1.0.12) with standard parameters for clustering after centering and scaling in the row direction.

Sequencing data of the epigenetic analyses are available under accession number PRJNA602737 in the Sequence Read Archive. Due to the sample size and the exploratory nature of this exercise, we omitted the correction for multiple testing. Pooling the CpG methylation values for all 3 samples in the respective groups was used to confirm or reject methylation differences (Wilcoxon) in CKO-CPC compared with those in WT-CPC.

SCA-1+ cell cloning

SCA-1+ cell cloning was described previously [22,32]. The protocol for clonal expansion of CPC is given in S1 Text.

Retroviral vector-mediated expression of ZFP423

For retroviral vector-mediated expression of ZFP423 the pMSCVFLAG-ZFP423 was used [42]. pMSCVFLAG-ZFP423 was a gift from Bruce Spiegelman (Addgene plasmid # 24764; RRID:Addgene_24764). The plasmid pMSCV-GFP was used for transduction of control cells. For generation of lentiviral supernatants, the ecotropic Phoenix Packaging cell line (kindly provided by G. Nolan, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA) was used [60]. Briefly, 5 × 106 Phoenix packaging cells were seeded on 10-cm plates in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). On the following day, retroviral constructs (5 μg), together with constructs encoding pGagpol (M57) (10 μg) and pEnv K73 (2 μg), were transiently transfected into Phoenix cells by the calcium phosphate transfection method. Six hours after transfection, the media were replaced by DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, and the cells were cultivated overnight. The media were removed and DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS was added and further incubated for 24 h. Supernatants were harvested and filtered through a 40-μm nylon filter and were either directly used for the transduction of CPC or stored at −80°C. Viral supernatants were added to CPC clones for 6 h in the presence of Polybrene (4 μg/ml). Transduction efficiency based on GFP-expression was controlled in all experiments.

Adipocyte differentiation of cCPC and isolated WT-CPC

For adipocyte differentiation, cCPC or isolated WT-CPC were seeded on 0.2% gelatin in DMEM/F12 with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) supplemented with insulin-transferrin, sodium selenite (ITS) (10 μg/ml insulin, 5 μg/ml transferrin, and 5 ng/ml sodium selenite), recombinant human (rh) fibroblast growth factor (FGF) basic (10 ng/ml), and EGF (20 ng/ml). The medium was replaced every 2–3 days. Two days after confluence, adipocyte differentiation was induced in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 μM dexamethasone (G-Biosciences, St. Louis, Montana, USA), 0.5 mM methylisobutylxanthine, 1 μg/ml insulin, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Indomethacin (100 μg/ml) or PGD2 (1 μM) were added to the adipocyte differentiation medium. After 2 days, the adipocyte differentiation medium was removed, and cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 μg/ml insulin. The cells were harvested in TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, USA) for RNA isolation or were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for Oil Red O staining.

Information on stimulation of HL-1 cells are provided in the supplemental methods

Adipocyte differentiation of human iPSC

The protocols for the generation and for the adipocyte differentiation of human iPSC are given in S1 Text.

Treatment of cCPC and human iPSC with DP receptor antagonists

cCPC and human iPSC were incubated with the DP1 receptor antagonist BWA868C and the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 (1 μM and 10 μM in DMSO, both from Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) starting 2 h prior PGD2 treatment. In addition, cells were treated with PGD2 and DMSO. Cells were cultivated for 48 h or for 2 weeks.

Endothelial differentiation of cCPC on Matrigel

The plates were coated with 50 μl/cm2 Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (Corning, New York, USA) at 37°C for 30 min. Clonal CPC (50,000 cells/cm2) were cultivated in endothelial cell growth medium-2 (EGM-2) complete medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) overnight. Cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde.

Isolation of murine adult primary cardiomyocytes and cell culture

Murine adult primary CMs were isolated and cultivated as described previously [61] from 3-month-old WT and CKO mice. Supernatants of adult primary CMs were collected after 48 h, centrifuged at 300g for 10 min to deplete cell fragments and stored at −80°C. Cells were harvested in TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for RNA isolation.

Isolation of RNA and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and cDNA synthesis was performed as described previously [22]. qRT-PCR with SYBR green dye method (Brilliant SYBR Green Mastermix-Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was performed with the AriaMx Real-Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) as described (22). Expression of mRNA levels were normalized using the 2−ΔΔCT method relative to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or 18S. A list of qRT-PCR primers used in this study is provided in the supplemental methods (Tables B and C in S1 Text).

Immunoblotting

Immunoblots were performed according to standard procedures using SDS-PAGE [17] and the STAT3-antibody (#9139, Cell Signaling).

Flow cytometry

A total of 5 × 105 freshly isolated CPC were stained with PREF-1 antibody (AF8277, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) and PDGFRα antibody (17-1401-81, eBioscience, San Diego, California, USA) for 15 min at room temperature. Flow cytometry was performed using the FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences).

Immunocytochemistry

Immunostainings using isolectin B4 (Vector Laboratories, California, USA) were performed according to standard procedures (22). For immunostainings using primary antibody recognizing perilipin (#9349, Cell Signaling) or resistin (ab119501, abcam, Cambridge, UK) cells were washed 3 times with PBS and blocked with 10% donkey serum and 0.3% Triton in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were stained with perilipin antibody (1:100) or resistin antibody (1:50) overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed 3 times, and incubation with the secondary antibody Cy3-anti-rabbit (1:250, Jackson ImmunoResearch) was performed for 2 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with DAPI Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were acquired with AxioVert200M microscope and Axiovison software 4.8, Axio Observer 7, and Zen 2.6 pro software (Carl Zeiss).

Oil red O staining

Oil Red O staining was performed as previously described [22]. A detailed description is provided in S1 Text.

Adipogenesis detection assay

Triglyceride accumulation in LV heart tissue was quantified by an adipogenesis detection assay (Abcam ab102513) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

PGD2 detection in supernatants of adult murine cardiomyocytes

PGD2 levels in the supernatants of primary adult murine CMs were measured using the prostaglandin D2 ELISA kit (Cayman Chemicals, No. 512031) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. PGD2 levels in supernatants of primary adult murine CMs were normalized to αMHC mRNA levels of the cells.

Patient data

All patients (males, N = 24; females, N = 15) enrolled in the study were diagnosed with heart failure due to idiopathic DCM. The sex- and age-matched control collective consisted of healthy males (N = 29) and females (N = 31) who displayed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (>55%), blood pressure, and heart rates.

LV tissues were taken from patients undergoing heart transplantation due to end-stage heart failure caused by DCM or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (DCM/ICM, n = 8). LV tissue from donor hearts not suited for transplantation served as controls (non-failing [NF], n = 6).

Blood tests

Blood samples were collected in S-Monovette tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, for plasma) or clot activator (for serum) in patients with the diagnosis for DCM. Plasma or serum were separated by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 min, and aliquots were stored at −80°C. Laboratory workup was performed as part of routine analysis by hospital laboratories. PGD2 serum levels were measured using the prostaglandin D2 ELISA kit (Cayman Chemicals, No. 512031) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0a and 8.1.2 for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). Normal distribution was tested using the D’Agostino normality test. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison between 2 groups was performed using 1 sample t test or unpaired 2-tailed t test. When comparing more than 2 groups, we used Bonferroni's multiple comparison test after 1-/2-way ANOVA testing. A 2-tailed p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Adipocyte formation in heart tissue of 3- and 6-month-old CKO mice.

(A) Capillary density (upper panel: IB4 (green)/WGA (red) and nuclear DAPI staining (blue), Sirius Red staining (middle panel) and CD45 positive infiltrates (lower panel: brown, co-stained with eosin) of LV cryosections of 6 m male WT or CKO mice, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Capillary density determined as the ratio of capillaries to CMs in transversely sectioned male WT (n = 7) and CKO (n = 5) LVs. (C) Dot plot summarizes VE-cadherin mRNA levels, of male WT (n = 6) and CKO LVs (n = 5), mean of WT was set at 100%. (D) Quantification of fibrosis from WT (n = 6) and CKO (n = 5) LVs in arbitrary units (arb. units). (E) Dot plot summarizes COL1A1 mRNA levels, of male WT (n = 8) and CKO LVs (n = 7), mean of WT was set at 100%. (F) Dot plot summarizes ADGRE1 mRNA levels of male WT (n = 8) and CKO LVs (n = 7), mean of WT was set at 100%. (G) Immunofluorescence staining of perilipin (red), resistin (red), or UCP-1 (red) counterstained with WGA-FITC (green) and DAPI (blue) in cryosections of heart tissue (male 6 m CKO mice), scale: 25 μM. (H) Perilipin staining in LV cryosections of 3- and 6-month-old (m) WT or CKO female (f) mice, perilipin (red), WGA (green), and DAPI (blue): scale bars: 50 μm. (B–F) All data are mean ± SD, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. WT, 2-tailed unpaired t test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; IB4, isolectin B4; LV, left ventricular; UCP-1, uncoupling protein 1; VE, vascular endothelial; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. STAT3 deficiency alters COX-2 and HPGD expression in LVs of aged male CKO mice, whereas in females only COX-2 expression is altered.

(A, E) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (A) HPGD and (E) COX-2 in LVs of 6-month-old male WT (n = 8) and CKO mice (n = 7). (B and F) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (B) HPGD and (F) COX-2 in LVs of 3-month-old female WT (n = 7) and CKO mice (n = 4). (C and G) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (C) HPGD and (G) COX-2 in LVs of 6-month-old female WT (n = 6) and CKO mice (n = 6). (D and H) Dot plots summarize (D) HPGD and (H) COX-2 mRNA levels of isolated adult female WT-CM and CKO-CM (CM isolated and pooled from 3 WT and 2 CKO mice). (A–H) All data are mean ± SD, and WT mean was set at 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT, 2-tailed unpaired t tests. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; COX, cyclooxygenase; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; LV, left ventricular; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. STAT3 deficiency alters COX-2 and HPGD expression in HL-1 CMs.

(A) Representative western blot showing protein expression of STAT3 in HL-1 control (ctrl) and STAT3-KD cells. PS served as a loading control. (B, C) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (B) HPGD and (C) COX-2 in HL-1 cells treated with testosterone (10 nM) for 24 h. (D, E) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (D) HPGD and (E) COX-2 in HL-1 cells treated with estrogen (10 nM) for 24 h. (B–E) Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 4, and the mean of HL-1-ctrl PBS was set at 100%, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. HL-1-ctrl PBS, # p <0.05, ## p <0.01 vs. HL-1-STAT3-KD PBS, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data and S11 Fig. COX, cyclooxygenase; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; KD, knockdown; PS, Ponceau S; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Methylation analysis of freshly isolated CKO- and WT-CPC.

(A) Heatmap of median methylation values in predicted DMRs (n = 83) overlapping with 81 unique genes. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Sequencing data of the epigenetic analyses are available under accession number PRJNA602737 in the Sequence Read Archive. CKO, conditional knockout; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; DMR, differentially methylated region; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Adipocyte differentiation and endothelial cell formation of cCPC expanded from single cells.

(A, B) Differentiation of cCPC expanded from single cells (A) on Matrigel (left panel: phase contrast, right panel: Isolectin B4 staining (green); scale bars indicate 100 μm) and (B) after adipogenic induction (upper left panel: phase contrast; upper right panel: perilipin staining [red], nuclear staining, DAPI [blue]; lower left panel: Oil Red O staining [red]; and lower right panel: perilipin staining [green], nuclear staining, DAPI [blue], Oil Red O staining [red]; scale bars indicate 50 μm). (C–J) mRNA levels of progenitor cell markers ((C) SCA1 and (D) PDGFRα), general adipocyte markers ((E) CEBPA, (F) FABP4), WAT markers ((G) LYZ2, (H) Resistin), and BAT/BET markers ((I) EBF2, (J) TMEM26) in undifferentiated and differentiated cCPC (n = 5 (C–F) and n = 3 (G–J) independent cell culture experiments. Statistically significant differences between the groups are represented as mean ± SD, and the mean of mRNA expression levels of undifferentiated cCPC were set at 100%, ** p <0.01 vs. control, * p < 0.05 vs. control, 1 sample t test). Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cCPC, clonally expanded CPC; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; PDGFRα, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26; WAT, white adipose tissue.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Retroviral overexpression of ZFP423 leads to white adipocyte differentiation of cCPC.

(A) Oil Red O staining of cCPC with retrovirally mediated overexpression of ZFP423. Control cells were transduced with the pMSCV-GFP control virusplasmid, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (C–E) qRT-PCR detects mRNA levels of (C) ZFP423 and of the adipocyte markers (D) CEBPA and (E) PPARγ. (F and G) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the white adipocyte markers (F) LYZ2 and (G) resistin. (H and I) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the brown/beige adipocyte markers (H) EBF2 and (I) TMEM26. (B–I) Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the mean of pMSCV-GFP transduced control cells was set to 100% (n = 6 (B–E) and n = 3 (F–I) independent experiments), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. pMSCV-GFP transduced control cells and 1 sample ttest. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cCPC, clonally expanded CPC; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; LYZ2, lysozyme 2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma isoform; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26;

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Treatment of human iPSC with PGD2 leads to white adipocyte differentiation.

(A and B), Bar graphs summarizes (A) EZH2 and (B) ZNF423 mRNA expression of human iPSC 48 h after PGD2 stimulation (1 μM) and treatment with the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 in indicated concentrations (100 nm, 1 μM and 10 μM) for 48 h. (C and D) Representative pictures after (C) resistin (red) staining and (D) Oil Red O staining of PGD2-treated human iPSC after 12 days; scale bars: 50 μm. (E) Bar graphs summarize the relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (F–H) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (F) EZH2, (G) ZNF423, and (H) CEBPA of PGD2 (1 μM) treated-human iPSC incubated with BAY-u 3405 in indicated concentrations and cultivated for 12 days. N = 3 (A, B, F–H) and n = 6 (E) independent experiments. (A, B, E–H) Bar graphs represent mean ± SD, and the mean of control cells was set to 100%, * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. PGD2 and DMSO-treated cells and 1 sample ttest. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; DP, PGD2 receptor; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell; PGD2, prostaglandin D2; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. EPO supplementation prevents enhanced adipocyte formation in cultivated male CKO-CPC.

(A, B) Bar graphs summarize ZFP423 mRNA levels in isolated male CPC incubated with rmEPO (10 ng/ml) for (A) 48 h or (B) 4 weeks after isolation ((A): n = 3 cell isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 mice per genotype and (B): n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (C) Oil Red O staining visualizes adipocytes in CKO-CPC cultures after 4 weeks of cultivation with or without the addition of rmEPO (10 ng/ml), scale bars: 50 μm. (D) Bar graph summarizing adipocyte counts (n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (E, F) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the adipocyte markers (E) CEBPA and (F) FABP4 after 4 weeks of cultivation (n = 3 independent cell isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (G) Bar graphs summarize EZH2 mRNA levels in isolated CPC incubated with rmEPO (10 ng/ml) for 48 h (n = 3 cell isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 mice per genotype). (A, B, D–G) Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the mean of WT PBS was set at 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT PBS, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. CKO PBS, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EPO, erythropoietin; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; rmEPO, recombinant murine erythropoietin; WT, wild-type.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Figure showing the successive plots and gates that were applied to the FCS files (Fig 2A).

(TIF)

S10 Fig. The uncropped gel for Fig 2B.

(TIFF)

S11 Fig. The uncropped western blot for SFig 3A.

(TIFF)

S1 Data. Numerical raw data.

All numerical raw data are combined in a single excel file, “S1_Data.xlsx,” This file consists of several spreadsheets and each spreadsheet contains the raw data of 1 figure.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 anti-rabbit APC (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S3 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 CD140a (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S4 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 IgG-APC (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S5 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S6 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 Pref-1 APC (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S7 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry AW (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S8 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Wash (Fig 2A).

(FCS)

S1 Table. Cardiac function and dimensions in male 3- and 6-month-old WT and CKO mice.

FS, LVEDD, LVESD, and heart rate (bpm) in 3- and 6-month-old male mice. Data expressed as mean ± SD, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs CKO 3 m, ## p < 0.01 vs WT 6 m, 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. bpm, beats per minute; CKO, conditional knockout; FS, fractional shortening; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; WT, wild-type.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Cardiac function and dimensions in female 3- and 6-month-old WT and CKO mice.

FS, LVEDD, LVESD, and heart rate (bpm) in 3- and 6-month-old female mice. Data expressed as mean ± SD, n.s., 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. bpm, beats per minute; CKO, conditional knockout; FS, fractional shortening; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; WT, wild-type.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Summary of clinical data from DCM patients and healthy sex-matched controls.

NYHA, LVEF, BP, and NT-proBNP were analyzed in routine clinical lab tests. Gaussian distribution was tested by D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus normality test Comparison between the groups was performed using Student t test for Gaussian distributed data (presented as mean ± SD) and the Mann Whitney U test where at least 1 column was not normally distributed (presented as median and range). BP, blood pressure; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Supplemental Methods.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Martina Kasten, Silvia Gutzke, Birgit Brandt, Iris Dallmann, and Tim Kohrn for excellent technical assistance. We thank the research core unit for laser microscopy at the Hannover Medical School and the Core Facility of the Fritz-Lipmann-Institute Jena.

Abbreviations

AR

androgen receptor

ARVD

arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

BAT

brown adipose tissue

BET

beige adipose tissue

BMP2

bone morphogenetic protein 2

BMP4

bone morphogenetic protein 4

cCPC

clonally expanded CPC

CEBPA

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha

CKO

conditional knockout

CM

cardiomyocyte

COX

cyclooxygenase

CPC

cardiac progenitor cell

DCM

dilated cardiomyopathy

DMEM

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

DMR

differentially methylated region

DNMT

DNA methyltransferase

DP

PGD2 receptor

EBF2

early B cell factor 2

EGF

epidermal growth factor

EGM-2

endothelial cell growth medium-2

EPO

erythropoietin

EZH2

enhancer of zeste homolog 2

FABP4

fatty acid binding protein 4

FBS

fetal bovine serum

FCS

fetal calf serum

FDR

false discovery rate

FGF

fibroblast growth factor

FITC

fluorescein isothiocyanate

GAPDH

glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

HL-1-ctrl-CM

PBS-incubated control HL-1

HL-1-STAT3-KD-CM

HL-1 cardiomyocytes with a lentiviral STAT3-KD

HPGD

hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase

IB4

isolectin B4

ICM

ischemic cardiomyopathy

IL

interleukin

iPSC

induced pluripotent stem cell

ITS

insulin-transferrin, sodium selenite

I/R

ischemia/reperfusion

KD

knockdown

LV

left ventricular

LVEF

left ventricular ejection fraction

LYZ2

lysozyme 2

MHC

myosin heavy chain

NaCl

sodium chloride

NF

non-failing, PCR2, polycomb repressive complex 2

PDGFRα

platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha

PG

prostaglandin

PGD2

prostaglandin D2

PGHS-2

prostaglandinsynthase-2

PGJ2

prostaglandin-J2

PPARγ

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma isoform

PPCM

peripartum cardiomyopathy

PRC2

polycomb repressive complex 2

PRDM16

PR-domain containing 16

PREF-1

preadipocyte factor 1

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time PCR

rh

recombinant human

rmEPO

recombinant murine erythropoietin

RRBS

reduced representation bisulfite sequencing

SCA-1

stem cell antigen-1

SD

standard deviation

STAT3

signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3

TMEM26

transmembrane protein 26

UCP-1

uncoupling protein 1

VE

vascular endothelial

WAT

white adipose tissue

WGA

wheat germ agglutinin

WT

wild-type

Zfp423

zinc-finger protein 423

Zfp521

zinc finger protein 521

ZNF

zinc nuclear factor

αMHC

alpha MHC

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files and all files from the genome-wide exploratory methylation profiling by RRBS are available in the Sequencing Read Archive (accession number PRJNA602737).

Funding Statement

This work was supported with financial funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG, HI 842/3-2 to D.H.-K.), by the DFG Clinical Research Group (DFG KFO311, HI 842/10-1 to D.H.-K., HI 842/10-2 to D.H.-K., RI 2531/2-1 to M.R.-H., RI 2531/2-2 to M.R.-H.), by the State of Lower Saxony and the Volkswagen Foundation (VWZN3009 to D.H.-K. and M.R.-H.), Hannover, Germany and by REBIRTH I/II as well as the BMBF project de.STAIR (031L0106D to S.H.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM. Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology: Why Women Are Overrepresented in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2018;138(2):198–205. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, Chandramouli C, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Kaye DM, et al. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(47):3859–68c. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karlsson T, Rask-Andersen M, Pan G, Hoglund J, Wadelius C, Ek WE, et al. Contribution of genetics to visceral adiposity and its relation to cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Nat Med. 2019;25(9):1390–5. 10.1038/s41591-019-0563-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anumonwo JMB, T. Fatty Infiltration of the Myocardium and Arrhythmogenesis: Potential Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Front Physiol. 2018;9:2 10.3389/fphys.2018.00002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Godinez-Valdez VH, Cazares-Campos I, Aranda-Fraustro A, Lopez-Jimenez F, Cardenas M, Marquez MF. Cardiac rupture in a patient with an acute myocardial infarction and extensive fatty infiltration of the heart (“adipositas cordis”). Int J Cardiol. 2012;154(3):e62–4. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.06.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu M, Zhao S, Jiang S, Yin G, Wang C, Zhang Y, et al. Fat deposition in dilated cardiomyopathy assessed by CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(8):889–98. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rui L. Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues in Health and Disease. Compr Physiol. 2017;7(4):1281–306. 10.1002/cphy.c170001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shao M, Gupta RK. Transcriptional brakes on the road to adipocyte thermogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2019;1864(1):20–8. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2018.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shapira SN, Seale P. Transcriptional Control of Brown and Beige Fat Development and Function. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(1):13–21. 10.1002/oby.22334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aldiss P, Davies G, Woods R, Budge H, Sacks HS, Symonds ME. ‘Browning’ the cardiac and peri-vascular adipose tissues to modulate cardiovascular risk. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:265–74. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shao M, Ishibashi J, Kusminski CM, Wang QA, Hepler C, Vishvanath L, et al. Zfp423 Maintains White Adipocyte Identity through Suppression of the Beige Cell Thermogenic Gene Program. Cell Metab. 2016;23(6):1167–84. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Conte M, Martucci M, Sandri M, Franceschi C, Salvioli S. The Dual Role of the Pervasive "Fattish" Tissue Remodeling With Age. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:114 10.3389/fendo.2019.00114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boengler K, Buechert A, Heinen Y, Roeskes C, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Heusch G, et al. Cardioprotection by Ischemic Postconditioning Is Lost in Aged and STAT3- Deficient Mice. Circ Res. 2007;102(1):131–5. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Kaminski K, Podewski E, Bonda T, Schaefer A, Sliwa K, et al. A Cathepsin D-Cleaved 16 kDa Form of Prolactin Mediates Postpartum Cardiomyopathy. Cell. 2007;128(3):589–600. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Podewski EK, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Morawietz H, Lichtenberg A, Wollert KC, et al. Alterations in Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling in patients with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2003;107:798–802. 10.1161/01.cir.0000057545.82749.ff [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stapel B, Kohlhaas M, Ricke-Hoch M, Haghikia A, Erschow S, Knuuti J, et al. Low STAT3 expression sensitizes to toxic effects of beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(5):349–61. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Fuchs M, Kaminski K, Schaefer A, Schieffer B, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is required for myocardial capillary growth, control of interstitial matrix deposition, and heart protection from ischemic injury. Circ Res. 2004;95(2):187–95. 10.1161/01.RES.0000134921.50377.61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jacoby JJ, Kalinowski A, Liu MG, Zhang SS, Gao Q, Chai GX, et al. Cardiomyocyte-restricted knockout of STAT3 results in higher sensitivity to inflammation, cardiac fibrosis, and heart failure with advanced age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(22):12929–34. 10.1073/pnas.2134694100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lindner D, Hilbrandt M, Marggraf K, Becher PM, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Klingel K, et al. Protective Function of STAT3 in CVB3-Induced Myocarditis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:437623 10.1155/2012/437623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Banerjee I, Fuseler JW, Intwala AR, Baudino TA. IL-6 loss causes ventricular dysfunction, fibrosis, reduced capillary density, and dramatically alters the cell populations of the developing and adult heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;296(5):H1694–704. 10.1152/ajpheart.00908.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haghikia A, Missol-Kolka E, Tsikas D, Venturini L, Brundiers S, Castoldi M, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-mediated regulation of miR-199a-5p links cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell function in the heart: a key role for ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(10):1287–97. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hoch M, Fischer P, Stapel B, Missol-Kolka E, Sekkali B, Scherr M, et al. Erythropoietin preserves the endothelial differentiation capacity of cardiac progenitor cells and reduces heart failure during anticancer therapies. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9(2):131–43. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang W, Qu X, Chen B, Snyder M, Wang M, Li B, et al. Critical Roles of STAT3 in beta-Adrenergic Functions in the Heart. Circulation. 2016;133(1):48–61. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ueda T, Bruchovsky N, Sadar MD. Activation of the androgen receptor N-terminal domain by interleukin-6 via MAPK and STAT3 signal transduction pathways. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(9):7076–85. 10.1074/jbc.M108255200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Signaroldi E, Laise P, Cristofanon S, Brancaccio A, Reisoli E, Atashpaz S, et al. Polycomb dysregulation in gliomagenesis targets a Zfp423-dependent differentiation network. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10753 10.1038/ncomms10753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim TH, Park JM, Kim MY, Ahn YH. The role of CREB3L4 in the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45300 10.1038/srep45300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shen JS, Meng XL, Wight-Carter M, Day TS, Goetsch SC, Forni S, et al. Blocking hyperactive androgen receptor signaling ameliorates cardiac and renal hypertrophy in Fabry mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(11):3181–91. 10.1093/hmg/ddv070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matsunaga S, Okigaki M, Takeda M, Matsui A, Honsho S, Katsume A, et al. Endothelium-targeted overexpression of constitutively active FGF receptor induces cardioprotection in mice myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46(5):663–73. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Takeda N, Maemura K, Imai Y, Harada T, Kawanami D, Nojiri T, et al. Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 gene promotes angiogenesis through the transactivation of both vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, Flt-1. Circ Res. 2004;95(2):146–53. 10.1161/01.RES.0000134920.10128.b4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Addison WN, Fu MM, Yang HX, Lin Z, Nagano K, Gori F, et al. Direct transcriptional repression of Zfp423 by Zfp521 mediates a bone morphogenic protein-dependent osteoblast versus adipocyte lineage commitment switch. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34(16):3076–85. 10.1128/MCB.00185-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hammarstedt A, Hedjazifar S, Jenndahl L, Gogg S, Grunberg J, Gustafson B, et al. WISP2 regulates preadipocyte commitment and PPARgamma activation by BMP4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(7):2563–8. 10.1073/pnas.1211255110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.De Pauw A, Andre E, Sekkali B, Bouzin C, Esfahani H, Barbier N, et al. Dnmt3a-mediated inhibition of Wnt in cardiac progenitor cells improves differentiation and remote remodeling after infarction. JCI Insight. 2017;2(12). 10.1172/jci.insight.91810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lehmann JM, Lenhard JM, Oliver BB, Ringold GM, Kliewer SA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(6):3406–10. 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kochel TJ, Goloubeva OG, Fulton AM. Upregulation of Cyclooxygenase-2/Prostaglandin E2 (COX-2/PGE2) Pathway Member Multiple Drug Resistance-Associated Protein 4 (MRP4) and Downregulation of Prostaglandin Transporter (PGT) and 15-Prostaglandin Dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2016;10:61–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bolli R, Stein AB, Guo Y, Wang OL, Rokosh G, Dawn B, et al. A murine model of inducible, cardiac-specific deletion of STAT3: its use to determine the role of STAT3 in the upregulation of cardioprotective proteins by ischemic preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50(4):589–97. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guo Y, Nong Y, Tukaye DN, Rokosh G, Du J, Zhu X, et al. Inducible cardiac-specific overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) confers resistance to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Basic Res Cardiol. 2019;114(5):32 10.1007/s00395-019-0741-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma K, Qiu J, Zhou M, Yang Y, Ye X. Cox-2 Negatively Affects the Protective Role of Propofol against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Induced Cardiomyocytes Apoptosis through Suppressing Akt Signaling. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7587451 10.1155/2019/7587451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang W, Hu Y, Wang X, Wang Q, Deng H. ROS-Mediated 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Degradation via Cysteine Oxidation Promotes NAD(+)-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25(3):255–61. e4. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kanda T, Yokosuka O. The androgen receptor as an emerging target in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2015;2:91–9. 10.2147/JHC.S48956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lonergan PE, Tindall DJ. Androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer development and progression. J Carcinog. 2011;10:20 10.4103/1477-3163.83937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vainio P, Gupta S, Ketola K, Mirtti T, Mpindi JP, Kohonen P, et al. Arachidonic acid pathway members PLA2G7, HPGD, EPHX2, and CYP4F8 identified as putative novel therapeutic targets in prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(2):525–36. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gupta RK, Arany Z, Seale P, Mepani RJ, Ye L, Conroe HM, et al. Transcriptional control of preadipocyte determination by Zfp423. Nature. 2010;464(7288):619–23. 10.1038/nature08816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gupta RK, Mepani RJ, Kleiner S, Lo JC, Khandekar MJ, Cohen P, et al. Zfp423 expression identifies committed preadipocytes and localizes to adipose endothelial and perivascular cells. Cell Metab. 2012;15(2):230–9. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pierron A, Le Pape E, Montaudie H, Castela E, De Donatis GM, Allegra M, et al. PGJ2 restores RA sensitivity in melanoma cells by decreasing PRAME and EZH2. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;73(3):258–61. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;439(7078):871–4. 10.1038/nature04431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang QY, Liang JF, Rogers CJ, Zhao JX, Zhu MJ, Du M. Maternal obesity induces epigenetic modifications to facilitate Zfp423 expression and enhance adipogenic differentiation in fetal mice. Diabetes. 2013;62(11):3727–35. 10.2337/db13-0433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fujimori K, Aritake K, Oishi Y, Nagata N, Maehara T, Lazarus M, et al. L-PGDS-produced PGD2 in premature, but not in mature, adipocytes increases obesity and insulin resistance. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1931 10.1038/s41598-018-38453-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Katsumata Y, Shinmura K, Sugiura Y, Tohyama S, Matsuhashi T, Ito H, et al. Endogenous prostaglandin D2 and its metabolites protect the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury by activating Nrf2. Hypertension. 2014;63(1):80–7. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Koyani CN, Windischhofer W, Rossmann C, Jin G, Kickmaier S, Heinzel FR, et al. 15-deoxy-Delta(1)(2),(1)(4)-PGJ(2) promotes inflammation and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes via the DP2/MAPK/TNFalpha axis. Int J Cardiol. 2014;173(3):472–80. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Asirvatham-Jeyaraj N, Jones AD, Burnett R, Fink GD. Brain Prostaglandin D2 Increases Neurogenic Pressor Activity and Mean Arterial Pressure in Angiotensin II-Salt Hypertensive Rats. Hypertension. 2019;74(6):1499–506. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gagliano-Juca T, Pencina KM, Ganz T, Travison TG, Kantoff PW, Nguyen PL, et al. Mechanisms responsible for reduced erythropoiesis during androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;315(6):E1185–E93. 10.1152/ajpendo.00272.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Shukla P, Klein G, Schaefer A, Stapel B, Hoch M, et al. Continuous glycoprotein-130-mediated signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 activation promotes inflammation, left ventricular rupture, and adverse outcome in subacute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2010;122(2):145–55. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. 2011. 2011;17(1):3. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hoffmann S, Otto C, Kurtz S, Sharma CM, Khaitovich P, Vogel J, et al. Fast mapping of short sequences with mismatches, insertions and deletions using index structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5(9):e1000502 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kretzmer H, Otto C, Hoffmann S. BAT: Bisulfite Analysis Toolkit: BAT is a toolkit to analyze DNA methylation sequencing data accurately and reproducibly. It covers standard processing and analysis steps from raw read mapping up to annotation data integration and calculation of correlating DMRs. F1000Research. 2017;6:1490 10.12688/f1000research.12302.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Otto C, Stadler PF, Hoffmann S. Fast and sensitive mapping of bisulfite-treated sequencing data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2012;28(13):1698–704. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45. 10.1101/gr.092759.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Juhling F, Kretzmer H, Bernhart SH, Otto C, Stadler PF, Hoffmann S. metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res. 2016;26(2):256–62. 10.1101/gr.196394.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010;26(6):841–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pear WS, Nolan GP, Scott ML, Baltimore D. Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(18):8392–6. 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Thackeray JT, Pietzsch S, Stapel B, Ricke-Hoch M, Lee CW, Bankstahl JP, et al. Insulin supplementation attenuates cancer-induced cardiomyopathy and slows tumor disease progression. JCI Insight. 2017;2(10). 10.1172/jci.insight.93098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Di Jiang, PhD

20 Apr 2020

Dear Dr Hilfiker-Kleiner,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Increased prostaglandin-D2 in male but not female STAT3-deficient hearts shifts cardiac progenitor cells from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise and I am writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Apr 22 2020 11:59PM.

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology

During resubmission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF when you re-submit.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

Given the disruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, please expect delays in the editorial process. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience caused and will do our best to minimize impact as far as possible.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Di Jiang, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

Decision Letter 1

Di Jiang, PhD

27 May 2020

Dear Dr Hilfiker-Kleiner,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Increased prostaglandin-D2 in male but not female STAT3-deficient hearts shifts cardiac progenitor cells from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation" for consideration as a Research Article at PLOS Biology. Your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by two independent reviewers.

The reviews of your manuscript are appended below. You will see that the reviewers find the work potentially interesting. However, based on their specific comments and following discussion with the academic editor, I regret that we cannot accept the current version of the manuscript for publication. We remain interested in your study and we would like to consider resubmission of a comprehensively revised version that thoroughly addresses all the reviewers' comments. Importantly, we would like to see evidence that the PGD2-Zfp423 axis is a critical pathway driving adipogenesis in vivo (reviewer 2), and more in-depth analyses of the human tissue samples (reviewer 1, point 3). We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript would be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers.

We appreciate that these requests represent a great deal of extra work, and we are willing to relax our standard revision time to allow you six months to revise your manuscript.We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 6 months.

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Resubmission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this resubmission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Di Jiang, PhD

PLOS Biology

*****************************************************

REVIEWS:

Reviewer #1: The study by Stelling et al. presents interesting results on how STAT3 deficiency drives left ventricular dysfunction during aging in male mice. The authors present clear evidence that a shift from differentiation of progenitor cells from endothelial cells towards adipocytes occurs in aged male STAT3 deficeint mice mainly driven by increased release of prostaglanin D2 due to increased activity of cyclooxygenase 2 and less activity of HPGD. The data are further supported by extensive in-vitro work on progenitor cells which most interestingly keep their phenotype even after long term cultivation. The experiments are well conducted and I have only a few points the authors might want to consider:

1. The release of PGD2 from isolated cardiomyocytes was normalized to total RNA. Why did the authors choose total RNA rather than a cardiomyocyte specific protein (troponin, alphaMHC) to account for cardiomyocyte number? Total RNA could still be derived from contaminating other cells.

2. Did the authors verify the changes obeserved in the immunohistology (figure 1) on capillary density and fibrosis by other techniques (Western blot: CD31, collagen etc)? Both the changes in capillary density and fibrosis (which appears to be very small (1-3%)) are not very impressive and most likely does not account for heart failure development.

3. The human data are interesting but very superficial. I am aware that obtaining human tissue might be complicated but at least the tissue available should be analyzed further: markers for endothelial cell content, adiopocyte content etc. Even more, some data from female heart failure patients would be of interest to proof that these parameters might differ depending on sex.

4. The authors demonstrate that COX2 might be a key protein in age-depnendent or post-partum triggered heart failure development in STAT3-deficiency. Does this mean that the phenotype can be rescued by COX2 inhibition? Did the authors try to treat aged male mice with COX2 inhibitors? In this context, the discussion on COX2 (PMID: 31734378; PMID: 31380437; PMID: 31278427 to name only a few recent studies) on ischemia-reperfusion related cardiac effects (which involves remodelling and heart failure development as well) needs to be extended.

Reviewer #2: Reduced expression and activity of cardiac STAT3 is linked to dilatative cardiomyopathy or peripartum cardiomyopathy; however, the mechanisms underlying pathologic cardiac remodeling triggered upon cardiomyocyte STAT3 inactivation has remained unclear. Here, the authors propose that cardiomyocyte-specific STAT3 deficiency leads increased PGD2

secretion from male cardiomyocyte but not from female cardiomyocytes. Increased PGD2 in the microenvironment then leads to suppression of EZH2 in cardiac progenitor cells (defined here as Sca-1+ positive cells) and subsequent activation of Zfp423, a transcription factor driving adipocyte differentiation. The authors propose that PGD2 driven adipogenesis from the Sca-1+ positive cells drive the ectopic adipocyte accumulation and loss of vascular density.

Overall, the manuscript is well written and the hypothesis is certainly novel and of general interest. The major concern lies in whether the states hypothesis is sufficiently supported by the data on hand. The authors demonstrate convincingly in vitro that PGD2 can activate Zfp423 expression in progenitor cells and promote adipogenesis. What is missing is evidence that this is the critical pathway driving adipogenesis in vivo in this model. In fact, any number of secreted factors from STAT3-deficient cardiomyocytes might influence adipogenesis. As such, the current observations establish associations, but not a clear sense of causality of the phenotype in vivo. For example, does inactivation of PGD2 receptor in Sca-1+ cells rescue the phenotype? Further evidence that this pathway is mediating the phenotype in vivo would strengthen the conclusions.

Decision Letter 2

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

4 Nov 2020

Dear Dr Hilfiker-Kleiner,

Thank you for submitting your revised Research Article entitled "Increased prostaglandin-D2 in male but not female STAT3-deficient hearts shifts cardiac progenitor cells from endothelial to white adipocyte differentiation" for publication in PLOS Biology. I have now obtained advice from the two original reviewers and have discussed their comments with the Academic Editor.

We're delighted to let you know that we're now editorially satisfied with your manuscript. However before we can formally accept your paper and consider it "in press", we also need to ensure that your article conforms to our guidelines. A member of our team will be in touch shortly with a set of requests. As we can't proceed until these requirements are met, your swift response will help prevent delays to publication. Please also make sure to address the data and other policy-related requests noted at the end of this email.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

- a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable

- a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable)

- a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript.

*Copyediting*

Upon acceptance of your article, your final files will be copyedited and typeset into the final PDF. While you will have an opportunity to review these files as proofs, PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling or significant scientific errors. Therefore, please take this final revision time to assess and make any remaining major changes to your manuscript.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Ines

--

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ETHICS STATEMENT:

- Please include the full name of the IACUC/ethics committee that reviewed and approved the animal care and use protocol/permit/project license. Please also include an approval number.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY: IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ

You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797

Note that we do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask that all individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper be made available in one of the following forms:

1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore).

2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication.

Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the following figure panels as they are essential for readers to assess your analysis and to reproduce it:

Fig. 1B, D-L; Fig. 2A, E-L; Fig. 3A-K; Fig. 4B-L; Fig. 5A, B, D-H; Fig. 6A-F; Fig. S1B, C, D, E; Fig. S2A-H; Fig. S3B-E; Fig. S4; Fig. S5C-J; Fig. S6B-I; Fig. S7A, B, E-H; Fig. S8A, B, D-G

NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

Please also ensure that figure legends in your manuscript include information on WHERE THE UNDERLYING DATA CAN BE FOUND, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

Please ensure that your Data Statement in the submission system accurately describes where your data can be found.

Thanks for depositing the sequencing data for epigenetic analyses in SRA - please make sure the data is made publicly available before the manuscript is accepted for production.

For figures containing flow cytometry data, we ask that you provide FCS files and a picture showing the successive plots and gates that were applied to the FCS files.

----------------------------------------------------------

Reviewers’ comments

Rev. 1:

None.

Rev. 2:

The authors have made a good effort to address the concerns with new data. The manuscript is now much better suited for publication.

Decision Letter 3

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

3 Dec 2020

Dear Dr Hilfiker-Kleiner,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Cecilia W Lo, I am pleased to inform you that we will be delighted to publish your Research Article in PLOS Biology.

PRODUCTION PROCESS

Before publication you will see the copyedited word document (within 5 business days) and a PDF proof shortly after that. The copyeditor will be in touch shortly before sending you the copyedited Word document. We will make some revisions at copyediting stage to conform to our general style, and for clarification. When you receive this version you should check and revise it very carefully, including figures, tables, references, and supporting information, because corrections at the next stage (proofs) will be strictly limited to (1) errors in author names or affiliations, (2) errors of scientific fact that would cause misunderstandings to readers, and (3) printer's (introduced) errors. Please return the copyedited file within 2 business days in order to ensure timely delivery of the PDF proof.

If you are likely to be away when either this document or the proof is sent, please ensure we have contact information of a second person, as we will need you to respond quickly at each point. Given the disruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there may be delays in the production process. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience caused and will do our best to minimize impact as far as possible.

EARLY VERSION

The version of your manuscript submitted at the copyedit stage will be posted online ahead of the final proof version, unless you have already opted out of the process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Biology and for your support of Open Access publishing. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide any assistance during the production process.

Kind regards,

Erin O'Loughlin

Publishing Editor,

PLOS Biology

on behalf of

Ines Alvarez-Garcia,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Adipocyte formation in heart tissue of 3- and 6-month-old CKO mice.

    (A) Capillary density (upper panel: IB4 (green)/WGA (red) and nuclear DAPI staining (blue), Sirius Red staining (middle panel) and CD45 positive infiltrates (lower panel: brown, co-stained with eosin) of LV cryosections of 6 m male WT or CKO mice, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Capillary density determined as the ratio of capillaries to CMs in transversely sectioned male WT (n = 7) and CKO (n = 5) LVs. (C) Dot plot summarizes VE-cadherin mRNA levels, of male WT (n = 6) and CKO LVs (n = 5), mean of WT was set at 100%. (D) Quantification of fibrosis from WT (n = 6) and CKO (n = 5) LVs in arbitrary units (arb. units). (E) Dot plot summarizes COL1A1 mRNA levels, of male WT (n = 8) and CKO LVs (n = 7), mean of WT was set at 100%. (F) Dot plot summarizes ADGRE1 mRNA levels of male WT (n = 8) and CKO LVs (n = 7), mean of WT was set at 100%. (G) Immunofluorescence staining of perilipin (red), resistin (red), or UCP-1 (red) counterstained with WGA-FITC (green) and DAPI (blue) in cryosections of heart tissue (male 6 m CKO mice), scale: 25 μM. (H) Perilipin staining in LV cryosections of 3- and 6-month-old (m) WT or CKO female (f) mice, perilipin (red), WGA (green), and DAPI (blue): scale bars: 50 μm. (B–F) All data are mean ± SD, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. WT, 2-tailed unpaired t test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; IB4, isolectin B4; LV, left ventricular; UCP-1, uncoupling protein 1; VE, vascular endothelial; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. STAT3 deficiency alters COX-2 and HPGD expression in LVs of aged male CKO mice, whereas in females only COX-2 expression is altered.

    (A, E) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (A) HPGD and (E) COX-2 in LVs of 6-month-old male WT (n = 8) and CKO mice (n = 7). (B and F) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (B) HPGD and (F) COX-2 in LVs of 3-month-old female WT (n = 7) and CKO mice (n = 4). (C and G) Dot plots summarize mRNA levels of (C) HPGD and (G) COX-2 in LVs of 6-month-old female WT (n = 6) and CKO mice (n = 6). (D and H) Dot plots summarize (D) HPGD and (H) COX-2 mRNA levels of isolated adult female WT-CM and CKO-CM (CM isolated and pooled from 3 WT and 2 CKO mice). (A–H) All data are mean ± SD, and WT mean was set at 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT, 2-tailed unpaired t tests. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; COX, cyclooxygenase; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; LV, left ventricular; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. STAT3 deficiency alters COX-2 and HPGD expression in HL-1 CMs.

    (A) Representative western blot showing protein expression of STAT3 in HL-1 control (ctrl) and STAT3-KD cells. PS served as a loading control. (B, C) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (B) HPGD and (C) COX-2 in HL-1 cells treated with testosterone (10 nM) for 24 h. (D, E) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (D) HPGD and (E) COX-2 in HL-1 cells treated with estrogen (10 nM) for 24 h. (B–E) Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 4, and the mean of HL-1-ctrl PBS was set at 100%, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs. HL-1-ctrl PBS, # p <0.05, ## p <0.01 vs. HL-1-STAT3-KD PBS, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data and S11 Fig. COX, cyclooxygenase; HPGD, hydroxyprostaglandin-dehydrogenase; KD, knockdown; PS, Ponceau S; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription factor-3.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Methylation analysis of freshly isolated CKO- and WT-CPC.

    (A) Heatmap of median methylation values in predicted DMRs (n = 83) overlapping with 81 unique genes. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. Sequencing data of the epigenetic analyses are available under accession number PRJNA602737 in the Sequence Read Archive. CKO, conditional knockout; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; DMR, differentially methylated region; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Adipocyte differentiation and endothelial cell formation of cCPC expanded from single cells.

    (A, B) Differentiation of cCPC expanded from single cells (A) on Matrigel (left panel: phase contrast, right panel: Isolectin B4 staining (green); scale bars indicate 100 μm) and (B) after adipogenic induction (upper left panel: phase contrast; upper right panel: perilipin staining [red], nuclear staining, DAPI [blue]; lower left panel: Oil Red O staining [red]; and lower right panel: perilipin staining [green], nuclear staining, DAPI [blue], Oil Red O staining [red]; scale bars indicate 50 μm). (C–J) mRNA levels of progenitor cell markers ((C) SCA1 and (D) PDGFRα), general adipocyte markers ((E) CEBPA, (F) FABP4), WAT markers ((G) LYZ2, (H) Resistin), and BAT/BET markers ((I) EBF2, (J) TMEM26) in undifferentiated and differentiated cCPC (n = 5 (C–F) and n = 3 (G–J) independent cell culture experiments. Statistically significant differences between the groups are represented as mean ± SD, and the mean of mRNA expression levels of undifferentiated cCPC were set at 100%, ** p <0.01 vs. control, * p < 0.05 vs. control, 1 sample t test). Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cCPC, clonally expanded CPC; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; PDGFRα, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26; WAT, white adipose tissue.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Retroviral overexpression of ZFP423 leads to white adipocyte differentiation of cCPC.

    (A) Oil Red O staining of cCPC with retrovirally mediated overexpression of ZFP423. Control cells were transduced with the pMSCV-GFP control virusplasmid, scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (C–E) qRT-PCR detects mRNA levels of (C) ZFP423 and of the adipocyte markers (D) CEBPA and (E) PPARγ. (F and G) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the white adipocyte markers (F) LYZ2 and (G) resistin. (H and I) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the brown/beige adipocyte markers (H) EBF2 and (I) TMEM26. (B–I) Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the mean of pMSCV-GFP transduced control cells was set to 100% (n = 6 (B–E) and n = 3 (F–I) independent experiments), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. pMSCV-GFP transduced control cells and 1 sample ttest. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. cCPC, clonally expanded CPC; CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EBF2, early B cell factor 2; LYZ2, lysozyme 2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma isoform; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; TMEM26, transmembrane protein 26;

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Treatment of human iPSC with PGD2 leads to white adipocyte differentiation.

    (A and B), Bar graphs summarizes (A) EZH2 and (B) ZNF423 mRNA expression of human iPSC 48 h after PGD2 stimulation (1 μM) and treatment with the DP2 receptor antagonist BAY-u 3405 in indicated concentrations (100 nm, 1 μM and 10 μM) for 48 h. (C and D) Representative pictures after (C) resistin (red) staining and (D) Oil Red O staining of PGD2-treated human iPSC after 12 days; scale bars: 50 μm. (E) Bar graphs summarize the relative quantification of Oil Red O measured by absorbance at 492 nm. (F–H) Bar graphs summarize mRNA levels assessed by qRT-PCR of (F) EZH2, (G) ZNF423, and (H) CEBPA of PGD2 (1 μM) treated-human iPSC incubated with BAY-u 3405 in indicated concentrations and cultivated for 12 days. N = 3 (A, B, F–H) and n = 6 (E) independent experiments. (A, B, E–H) Bar graphs represent mean ± SD, and the mean of control cells was set to 100%, * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. ctrl, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. PGD2 and DMSO-treated cells and 1 sample ttest. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; DP, PGD2 receptor; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell; PGD2, prostaglandin D2; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. EPO supplementation prevents enhanced adipocyte formation in cultivated male CKO-CPC.

    (A, B) Bar graphs summarize ZFP423 mRNA levels in isolated male CPC incubated with rmEPO (10 ng/ml) for (A) 48 h or (B) 4 weeks after isolation ((A): n = 3 cell isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 mice per genotype and (B): n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (C) Oil Red O staining visualizes adipocytes in CKO-CPC cultures after 4 weeks of cultivation with or without the addition of rmEPO (10 ng/ml), scale bars: 50 μm. (D) Bar graph summarizing adipocyte counts (n = 5 independent isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (E, F) qRT-PCR visualizes mRNA levels of the adipocyte markers (E) CEBPA and (F) FABP4 after 4 weeks of cultivation (n = 3 independent cell isolations, each isolation consists of 10 to 12 animals per genotype). (G) Bar graphs summarize EZH2 mRNA levels in isolated CPC incubated with rmEPO (10 ng/ml) for 48 h (n = 3 cell isolations, each isolation consists of 8 to 12 mice per genotype). (A, B, D–G) Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the mean of WT PBS was set at 100%, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. WT PBS, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 vs. CKO PBS, 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Underlying data can be found in S1 Data. CEBPA, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; CKO, conditional knockout; CM, cardiomyocyte; CPC, cardiac progenitor cell; EPO, erythropoietin; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein 4; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; rmEPO, recombinant murine erythropoietin; WT, wild-type.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Figure showing the successive plots and gates that were applied to the FCS files (Fig 2A).

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. The uncropped gel for Fig 2B.

    (TIFF)

    S11 Fig. The uncropped western blot for SFig 3A.

    (TIFF)

    S1 Data. Numerical raw data.

    All numerical raw data are combined in a single excel file, “S1_Data.xlsx,” This file consists of several spreadsheets and each spreadsheet contains the raw data of 1 figure.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 anti-rabbit APC (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S3 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 CD140a (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S4 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 IgG-APC (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S5 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S6 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Sca-1 Pref-1 APC (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S7 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry AW (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S8 Data. FCS file for flow cytometry Wash (Fig 2A).

    (FCS)

    S1 Table. Cardiac function and dimensions in male 3- and 6-month-old WT and CKO mice.

    FS, LVEDD, LVESD, and heart rate (bpm) in 3- and 6-month-old male mice. Data expressed as mean ± SD, * p <0.05, ** p <0.01 vs CKO 3 m, ## p < 0.01 vs WT 6 m, 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. bpm, beats per minute; CKO, conditional knockout; FS, fractional shortening; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; WT, wild-type.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Cardiac function and dimensions in female 3- and 6-month-old WT and CKO mice.

    FS, LVEDD, LVESD, and heart rate (bpm) in 3- and 6-month-old female mice. Data expressed as mean ± SD, n.s., 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. bpm, beats per minute; CKO, conditional knockout; FS, fractional shortening; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; WT, wild-type.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Summary of clinical data from DCM patients and healthy sex-matched controls.

    NYHA, LVEF, BP, and NT-proBNP were analyzed in routine clinical lab tests. Gaussian distribution was tested by D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus normality test Comparison between the groups was performed using Student t test for Gaussian distributed data (presented as mean ± SD) and the Mann Whitney U test where at least 1 column was not normally distributed (presented as median and range). BP, blood pressure; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Text. Supplemental Methods.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal PLoS Biologyfinal.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal PLoS Biologyfinal.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files and all files from the genome-wide exploratory methylation profiling by RRBS are available in the Sequencing Read Archive (accession number PRJNA602737).


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES