Abstract
Oral cavity is an uncommon site for occurrence of metastasis and usually indicates widespread systemic disease. Primary tumours from the lung most commonly metastasise to oral soft tissues (31.3%) and jaw bones (22%) among men. It is quite challenging to diagnose a solitary metastatic lesion and to determine the site of primary lesion, due to the rarity of these occurrences. This case report describes the jaw bone as a first sign of occult primary lung adenocarcinoma with multiple metastases in 47-year-old man. The patient was treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel, and has completed two cycles till date with a stable clinical course. Diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of jaw is very challenging. The pathologist must have knowledge of ancillary techniques along with clinical, radiological and histological correlation to determine the origin of distant primary.
Keywords: cancer - see oncology, dentistry and oral medicine, lung cancer (oncology), pathology
Background
Metastasis to jaws and oral soft tissues is very uncommon and accounts for 1% of oral malignancies.1 Oral metastasis is the first sign of occult malignancy at a distant site in 25% of cases. Furthermore, oral metastasis is revealed prior to detection of malignancy of distant primary in approximately 20% of cases.1 2 Metastatic lesions arising from carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) pose a diagnostic conundrum in the oral cavity. CUP are heterogeneous group of histologically proven metastatic malignant neoplasms where primary site of tumour remains undefined, even after a wide array of investigations.2 Between 3% and 5% of all newly diagnosed malignant tumours are CUP and they are the third to fourth most common causes of cancer death.2 3
In this case report, we describe a rare case where a metastatic adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the mandible was the first sign of undetected primary malignancy with multiple occult metastases. Furthermore, this case highlights how histopathology and immunohistochemistry of a jaw lesion, in combination with advanced imaging techniques, helped to uncover an occult primary lung ADC.
Case presentation
A 47-year-old male patient presented with bony hard swelling on the left mandible for 3 months. The patient had been smoking 20 cigarettes/day for 30 years. On examination, there was bony hard swelling on the left mandible extending anteroposteriorly from angle of mouth to tragus of ear and superoinferiorly from the zygoma to submandibular region. Intraoral examination revealed fleshy, firm proliferative growth measuring approximately 3×2×1.5 cm on the gingivobuccal complex of left mandibular first premolar to first molar teeth region with associated grade III mobility of the involved teeth (figure 1).
Figure 1.

Clinical presentation of the patient, revealed soft fleshy growth on left alveologingival complex.
Investigations
Orthopantomogram showed radiolucent lytic lesions, ill-defined margins with ‘moth-eaten’ appearance suggestive of osteomyelitis affecting almost the entire mandible. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) showed permeative lytic destruction of the left mandible with periosteal reaction, cortical breach in few areas and erosion of the mandibular alveolar arches extending up to the temporomandibular joint. Significant soft tissue component involving the masticatory space, invading into the muscles of mastication and floor of mouth, was also seen (figure 2).
Figure 2.
Radiological features of the patient. (A) Orthopantomogram showed large, expansile lytic lesion (arrow) involving body and ramus of left hemimandible. (B) Axial bone window (CT) revealed predominantly lytic lesion with speculated (arrow) and multilayered (arrowhead) periosteal reaction. (C) Coronal soft tissue window (CT) showed significant soft tissue component (asterisk) involving masticatory space, invading into the muscles of mastication and floor of mouth.
Differential diagnosis
Radiological differential diagnosis of osteosarcoma, primary intraosseous carcinoma and a metastatic lesion were considered. Histology revealed atypical epithelial cells proliferating in glandular, cribriform arrangement and isolated tumour cells within dense fibrous stroma invading into bone. These glandular structures were lined by cuboidal to columnar cells exhibiting papillary projections in few areas. These cells showed marked nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromatism, and abundant mucous and clear cell differentiation. Histomorphological features were compatible with malignancy of glandular origin (figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3.
Histopathology of the mandibular lesion in low power (10×) revealed (A–C) atypical glandular epithelial cells forming abortive glandular structures and isolated tumour cells and (D) bony invasion by atypical cells, H&E stain.
Figure 4.
Higher magnification of the lesion (40×) showed (A, B) tumour cells with marked nuclear pleomorphism, (C) invading into bone and (D) abundant clear and mucous cell differentiation.
Histological differential diagnosis of malignant salivary gland neoplasms (adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma) followed by metastatic tumours were considered. Tumour cells were immunopositive for pan cytokeratin (CK), CK7, mucin 5AC in few mucus cells and immunonegative for smooth muscle actin (SMA), p40 and CD117. Ki67 proliferation index was approximately 62%. Immunonegativity for SMA, p40, CD117 and negativity for periodic acid–Schiff and mucicarmine stains ruled out mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Further, negative CK20 ruled out other metastatic tumours from unknown primary. Narrowing our list of CUP subset (CK7+, CK20 and male patient), lung ADC was considered as most probable diagnosis (the most common cancer among males with smoking history). However, tumour cells were immunonegative for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and focal patchy positive for napsin (figure 5).
Figure 5.
Immunohistochemistry profile of tumour showed (A) immunopositivity for pan cytokeratin (CK) and (B) CK7. (C) Ki67 proliferation index and (D) focal patchy positivity for napsin.
Skeletal survey and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate whole body bone scan (with single-photon emission CT, figure 6) was performed to determine the primary site of metastasis. CECT chest (figure 7) revealed a conglomerate mass along left main bronchus, bronchial wall thickening extending along hilar lymph node causing collapse of left lung, multiple soft tissue nodules in contralateral lung and pleural nodules. Permeative destruction of right first rib along with infiltration in mediastinal vascular structures was also seen. There was no abnormality in abdomen and pelvis region (liver, kidney, spleen, prostate and urinary bladder). In view of imaging findings of nodules in the lung, a lung biopsy was performed which confirmed ADC of lung as primary lesion.
Figure 6.
Skeletal metastases on 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate whole body bone scan (with single-photon emission CT). Focal increased radiotracer uptake is seen in the left half of mandible, medial end of left clavicle, few bilateral ribs, D8 and D12 vertebra and the neck of left femur.
Figure 7.

Contrast-enhanced CT chest. (A, B) Mediastinal window reveals heterogeneously enhancing mass (* in A) at left hilum with bronchial wall thickening and narrowing of left main bronchus (arrow in A). There is concentric pleural thickening (arrow in B) and pleural effusion (* in B). (C) Lung window shows multiple nodules (arrow) in right lung suggestive of pulmonary metastases. (D) Bone window shows permeative lytic destruction of right first rib (arrow) with soft tissue and lytic sclerotic lesion in medial end of left clavicle (arrowhead), suggestive of bone metastases.
Treatment
The patient was treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), which is one of the standard chemotherapy for both lung ADC and CUP.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient had completed two cycles with a stable clinical course. However, after a period of 2 weeks, the patient succumbed to death.
Discussion
Most metastatic tumours to the orofacial region are detected in the fifth to seventh decade. Ninety per cent of cases involve the jaw bones, especially the mandible. Dissemination to the oral soft tissues is extremely rare and accounts for 0.1% of malignancies.4 The proportion of CUP metastasising to oral region varies from 5% to 17%.5 In autopsy findings, 50%–75% of patients of CUP had lung as the primary site of cancer and most patients with CUP had additional metastatic spread to viscera, bone and brain.6 Spread of lung cancer to the jaw bone (rare) indicates late-stage disease (table 1).7
Table 1.
10-Year review of literature showing lung adenocarcinoma metastasising to jaw bone (2011–2020)
| Author and year | Age (years) |
Sex | Site | Clinical presentation | Radiology | IHC and/or genetic profile | Survival time |
| Abe et al,10 2019 | 76 | M | Palate | Swelling | MRI showed small localised mass on palatal mucosa | CK7+ CK20− TTF− Napsin− KRAS mutations |
4 months |
| Savitri et al,11 2018 | 64 | F | Anterior mandible | Pain | Irregular radiolucent lesion | CK7+ CK20− TTF+ |
Follow-up till 10 months, alive |
| Matsuda et al,6 2018 | 83 | F | Right Mandible | Trismus, swelling, spontaneous pain | Bone destruction in ramus and condyle | CK7+ CK20− TTF+ Napsin+ Thyroglobin− Vimentin+ |
2 year follow-up, alive |
| Rogulj et al,12 2017 | 54 | M | Mandible | – | Osteolytic lesion | – | 1 month |
| Gultekin et al,13 2016 | 72 | M | Right mandible | Pain, swelling | Extensive lytic lesion | CK7+ HMWK− P63− TTF+ |
6 months |
| Rajinikanth et al, 20154 | 60 | M | Right mandible | Swelling | Well-defined osteolytic lesion with periosteal reaction and calcifications | – | NA |
| Dirican et al,14 2014 | 75 | F | Right mandible | Pain, paraesthesia, swelling | – | CK7+ TTF+ EGFR, ALK−, no mutations |
8 weeks |
| Misir et al,15 2013 | 55 | M | Right mandible | Pain, swelling | Ill-defined radiolucent lytic lesion | – | 5 months |
| Hashmi et al,16 2011 | 58 | M | Left mandible | Pain, numb chin syndrome | Ill-defined radiolucency with radio-opaque foci | – | NA |
ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; CK, cytokeratin; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; F, female; HMWK, high-molecular-weight kininogen; IHC, immunohistochemistry; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene; M, male; NA, not available; TTF, thyroid transcription factor.
The pathogenesis of jaw bone metastasis is poorly understood but it is mainly attributed to haematogenous route with Batson venous plexus.6
Lung ADC particularly has been stated to be strongly associated with smoking which also promotes dissemination of disease.5 8 The present case was a known smoker; thus, widespread metastatic disease may be attributed to the smoking habit.
Advancement in imaging, immunohistochemical markers and molecular techniques have proven to be indispensable for diagnosing occult primary malignancies but workup for CUP is still perplexing. Pan CK and CK7/CK20 coordinated expression is used as primary screening panel to narrow down the differential diagnosis which is then confirmed by organ-restricted markers (table 2).
Table 2.
CK7+ CK20– profile in malignancies in male (pan CK+, vimentin–, S100– and LCA–) (modified from Lin and Liu17)
| Lung adenocarcinoma | TTF+ napsin A+ Surfactant A+/– |
| Stomach adenocarcinoma | CEA+ CDX2–/+ MUC1–/+ MUC5AC–/+ |
| Oesophageal adenocarcinoma | CDX2+/– CEA+, CDH17+ MUC1–/+ MUC5AC+/– SATB2- |
| Pancreatic adenocarcinoma | DPC4–/+ CK17±pVHL– Maspin+S100P+ IMP3+MUC5AC+ |
| Thymic carcinoma | CD5±p63+/– PAX8+/– |
| Salivary ductal carcinoma | GATA3+ AR+ GCDFP-15+ |
| Thyroid medullary carcinoma | TTF+ Calcitonin+ CEA+ |
| Thyroid carcinoma (papillary and follicular) | PAX-8+ TTF-1+ Thyroglobulin+ |
AR, androgen receptor; CD5, cluster of differentiation 5; CDH17, cadherin-17; CDX2, caudal-type homeobox 2; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CK, cytokeratin; DPC4, SMAD family member 4; GATA3, GATA binding protein 3; GCDFP-15, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15; IMP3, insulin-like growth factor; LCA, leucocyte common antigen; Maspin, mammary serine protease inhibitor; MUC, mucin; PAX, paired box gene; pVHL, von Hippel-Lindau protein; SATB2, special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2; TTF, thyroid transcription factor.
The expression of CK7+ and CK20– profile in our case was suggestive of lung ADC; thus, its specific markers were employed. TTF-1 and napsin A are quite sensitive and specific markers for lung ADC; their co-expression strongly suggests possibility of lung ADC. However, positivity for both the markers is seen in 70%–80% and 75% of lung ADCs and also in some non-pulmonary carcinomas.9 The present case showed TTF-1 negativity and focal positivity for napsin. Skeletal survey further helped in locating the masses in lungs and excluding other differentials thereby finally diagnosing it as metastasis from primary lung ADC. Molecular techniques have also demonstrated mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase in non-smokers and Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene in smokers with lung ADC. This may help further in characterisation and early diagnosis.4
Treatment in most cases is palliative care aimed at improving quality of life as malignant dissemination to oral cavity usually indicates widespread disease. The treatment options include surgical resection sometimes combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The prognosis is poor with median survival in months.1
Learning points.
Diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of jaw is very challenging due to non-specific symptoms further confounded by presentation of oral symptoms prior to occult primary and no history of previous malignancy.
Clinicians must consider metastatic lesion in differential diagnosis of malignancies especially in older adults and determine the site of primary lesion.
Oral and maxillofacial pathologists must have knowledge of immunohistochemical markers and molecular techniques along with clinical and radiological correlation to determine the origin of distant primary.
Acknowledgments
We would like to sincerely acknowledge Dr Aanchal Kakkar, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, for histopathological analysis of the case and reviewing our manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge Dr Krushna Bhatt, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, for contributing to case history of the patient.
Footnotes
Contributors: DM did conception and design of the case, gave final approval and is the guarantor of manuscript. HK, DM, SM and OB performed acquisition of data (laboratory or clinical/literature search), analysis and interpretation of data collected, and drafting of article and critical revision.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
References
- 1.Hirshberg A, Berger R, Allon I, et al. Metastatic tumors to the jaws and mouth. Head Neck Pathol 2014;8:463–74. 10.1007/s12105-014-0591-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bodner L, Sion-Vardy N, Geffen DB, et al. Metastatic tumors to the jaws: a report of eight new cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E132–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Choi J, Nahm JH, Kim SK. Prognostic clinicopathologic factors in carcinoma of unknown primary origin: a study of 106 consecutive cases. Oncotarget 2017;8:62630–40. 10.18632/oncotarget.16021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rajinikanth M, Prakash AR, Swathi TR, et al. Metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma to the jaw bone. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2015;19:385–8. 10.4103/0973-029X.174624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shen M-L, Kang J, Wen Y-L, et al. Metastatic tumors to the oral and maxillofacial region: a retrospective study of 19 cases in West China and review of the Chinese and English literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:718–37. 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matsuda S, Yoshimura H, Yoshida H, et al. Mandibular metastasis as the first clinical indication of occult lung adenocarcinoma with multiple metastases: a case report. Medicine 2018;97:e0296. 10.1097/MD.0000000000010296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pezzuto A, Morrone M, Mici E. Unusual jaw metastasis from squamous cell lung cancer in heavy smoker: two case reports and review of the literature. Medicine 2017;96:e6987. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ozlü T, Bülbül Y. Smoking and lung cancer. TuberkToraks, 2005: 200–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kandalaft PL, Gown AM. Practical applications in immunohistochemistry: carcinomas of unknown primary site. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:508–23. 10.5858/arpa.2015-0173-CP [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abe M, Watanabe K, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, et al. Identification of a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma of the palate mucosa through genetic and histopathological analysis: a rare case report and literature review. BMC Cancer 2019;19:52. 10.1186/s12885-019-5277-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Savithri V, Suresh R, Janardhanan M, et al. Metastatic adenocarcinoma of mandible: in search of the primary. BMJ Case Rep 2018;11. 10.1136/bcr-2018-227862. [Epub ahead of print: 14 Dec 2018]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andabak Rogulj A, Tomasovic Loncaric C, Muller D, et al. Solid malignant metastases in the jaw bones. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56:705–8. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gultekin SE, Senguven B, Gonul I, et al. Unusual presentation of an adenocarcinoma of the lung metastasizing to the mandible, including molecular analysis and a review of the literature. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg 2007;74:e1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dirican N, Gunes S, Karakaya Y, et al. Mandible bone metastases secondary to pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Med Arch 2014;68:356–8. 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.356-358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Misir AF, Mercan U, Günhan O. Metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma to the mandible: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013;17:253–6. 10.4103/0973-029X.119745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hashmi S, Ahmed SS, Parveen S, et al. Metastatic adenocarcinoma of the mandible-a rare entity. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2011;1:44–6. 10.1016/S2212-4268(11)60011-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin F, Liu H. Immunohistochemistry in undifferentiated neoplasm/tumor of uncertain origin. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1583–610. 10.5858/arpa.2014-0061-RA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





