Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2016 Nov 11;1(1):841–842. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1247677

The complete mitochondrial genome of Tringa ochropus (Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae)

Wan Chen a, Chaochao Hu b,✉, Qing Chang c
PMCID: PMC7799479  PMID: 33473649

Abstract

The green sandpiper Tringa ochropus (Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae) is completely migratory with an extremely large distribution range. However, its habitat ecology, and disease spreading are relatively understudied, and the molecular genetics is relatively unclear. In this study, we report the complete mitochondrial genome of T. ochropus, which is a circular molecule of 16,906 bp in length and the A + T content of overall base of the composition of H-strand is 54.88% (A: 31.62%, T: 25.53%, C: 29.47%, G: 13.38%). This study strongly supports the monophyly of Charadriiformes, and division of the order into three major clades, including Lari, Scolopaci, and Charadrii.

Keywords: Mitogenome, Tringa ochropus, charadriiformes


The green sandpiper Tringa ochropus (Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae) is completely migratory with an extremely large distribution range, which have brown wings with little light dots and a delicate but contrasting neck and chest pattern. Recent studies of T. ochropus have paid more attention on habitat ecology, environmental disruption, and disease spreading (Gresíková et al. 1975; Smith et al. 1992; Malekian & Hosseinpour-Mohamadabadi 2015). However, the basic genetics data of T. ochropus are relatively unclear. In this study, we sequenced the complete mitogenome of T. ochropus to better understand the mitogenomic characteristics and its phylogenetic relationships within Charadriiformes.

The muscle specimen of T. ochropus was collected from the Lukou Country, Nanjing, International Airport, Jiangsu Province, China (31°43'47" N, 118°52'26" E). The voucher specimen was preserved in absolute ethanol at Nanjing Normal University (NJNU: Toc-2015017), Nanjing, China. Total DNA was extracted with standard phenol–chloroform methods according to Sambrook and Russell (1989). The complete mitochondrial genome was amplified and sequenced by 13 pairs of primers. Annotations were confirmed by comparing other Charadriiformes species with MITOS-generated annotations (Bernt et al. 2013).

The circular mitogenome of T. ochropus is 16,906 bp in length with 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNAs (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), 22 transfer RNA genes, and a non-coding region. The mitogenome size is well within the range found in Charadriiformes, from 16,357 (Sternula albifrons, GenBank No. KT350612) to 17,135 bp (Vanellus cinereus, KM873665). The overall nucleotide composition was A: 31.62%, T: 25.53%, C: 29.47%, G: 13.38%. The annotated mitogenome of T. ochropus is available online in NCBI (KX668223).

We performed a phylogenetic analysis based on 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) of the available mitogenome sequences of 19 Charadriiformes and two other species, using maximum Bayesian (BI), likelihood (ML) and neighbour-joining (NJ) methods. These sequences were aligned with Clustal X 1.81 (Thompson et al. 1997) with default parameters. Total of 14,120 bp were used for phylogenetic analyses. There were 8447 (59.82%) conserved sites, 4294 (30.41%) parsim-info sites, and 1379 (9.77%) singleton sites. Models of molecular evolution were assessed using MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004), and GTR + I + G model was selected. BI were performed using MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Four Markov Chains Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains were run for 1.0 × 106 generations. Two independent runs were performed to allow additional confirmation of the convergence of MCMC runs. ML and NJ phylogenetic analyses were performed using PAUP v4.0b10 (Swofford 2002), and the relative support of internal nodes was assessed by bootstrap analyses with 1000 replications.

The phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) resolved a well-supported clade of Charadriiformes, in which Tringa appears to be sister group of Scolopax. This result indicates that there is great mitochondrial divergence within the Charadriiformes. Relationships of the order Charadriiformes strongly support the monophyly of Charadriiformes, and division of the order into three major clades including Lari (Laridae, Stercorariidae and Alcidae) and its sister Scolopaci (Scolopacidae and Jacanidae), which is in turn sister to the suborder Charadrii (Charadriidae, Haematopodidae, and Recurvirostridae).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogeny of T. ochropus and closely related 18 mitochondrial sequences constructed using the BI, ML and NJ methods by analyzing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs). Numbers above each branches are the posterior probabilities, ML and NJ bootstrap support. GenBank accession numbers of each species are shown in parentheses.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

  1. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendor M, Stadler PF.. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gresíková M, Sekeyová M, Prazniaková E.. 1975. Isolation and identification of group B arboviruses from the blood of birds captured in Czechoslovakia. Acta Virol. 19:162–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Malekian M, Hosseinpour-Mohamadabadi Z.. 2015. Mercury levels in common (Actitis hypoleucos) and green (Tringa ochropus) sandpipers from west-central Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 94:564–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author at http://www.csit.fsu.edu/∼nylander/, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DJ, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP.. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biol. 61:539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sambrook J, Russell DW.. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Vol. 3 Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith KW, Reed JM, Trevis BE.. 1992. Habitat use and site fidelity of Green Sandpipers Tringa ochropus wintering in Southern England. Bird Study. 39:155–164. [Google Scholar]
  8. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG.. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876–4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES