Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2016 Jul 10;1(1):472–474. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2016.1186518

The complete mitochondrial genome of sponge Tethya sp. (Demospongiae, Tethyida, Tethyidae)

Yuan Zhang a,b, Dan Huang a,b, Dexiang Wang a,b,, Shaoxiong Ding b
PMCID: PMC7799499  PMID: 33473525

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome of Tethya sp. was studied. This is the second complete mitochondrial report on the family Tethyidae. The mitochondrial genome of Tethya sp. is 20,582 bp in length, containing 14 protein-coding genes and 25 tRNA genes, with 2 rRNA genes. Our phylogenetic result suggested that Tethya sp. converged well with Tethya actinia, which further verified the morphological result. We anticipate our study to shed light on future molecular studies of demosponges.

Keywords: Demosponge, mitogenome, sponge, Tethya sp.


Sponge systematics is a long-standing issue due to vulnerability to environmental modification which enhancing the difficulty in taxonomy. As a supplementary measure for morphological taxonomy, studies have applied the mitochondrial genome of metazoa as a marker to resolve taxonomic controversies (Gissi et al. 2008). Little information is known about the evolution of sponges. Currently, only one complete mitogenome of Tethya actinia has been reported for the genus Tethya (Lavrov et al. 2005). In this study, we concentrated on exploring an approach of aligning mitochondrial genome with other demosponges to describe the molecular relationships among them.

Tethya sp. was sampled from Gulei Peninsula, Fujian Province, China (117.5928E 23.8015N), in May 2014 and deposited in the Museum of Marine Science and Technology, Xiamen University with the number XMU02001 079. DNA was extracted using guanidinium isothiocyanate with the method adapted from Wilson and Carson (2001) and sequenced with MPS (massive parallel sequencing) Illumina technology. The sample was constructed in a paired-end library with an insert size of 420 bp and was sequenced using a Hiseq2500 (Beijing, China) by PE125 strategy. Sequencing and annotation was performed at Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co. Ltd. Clean reads were assembled by SOAPdenovo (Li et al. 2008, 2010) to produce a single circular form of the complete mitochondrial genome. A whole genome Blast (Altschul et al. 1990) search (E-value ≤1e − 5, minimal alignment length percentage≥ 40%) against 6 databases, KEGG (Kanehisa 1997; Kanehisa et al. 2004; Kanehisa et al. 2006), COG (Tatusov et al. 1997; Tatusov et al. 2003), NR, Swiss-Prot (Magrane & Consortium 2011), GO (Ashburner et al. 2000) and TrEMBL (Magrane & Consortium 2011), was conducted. An alignment of the assembled scaffold for Tethya sp. demonstrated that mitogenome of Tethya actinia (GenBank number: AY320033.1) shared many similarities (86% identity) with our sample. We took the homological mitogenome as reference using the mitochondrial genome annotation (MITOS) server (Bernt et al. 2013) for annotation and BLASTX to improve results. Subsequently, we obtained annotated coding DNA sequences (CDS), transfer RNA genes (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes.

The complete genome of Tethya sp. is 20,582 bp long with 14 protein-coding genes, 25 tRNA genes and 2 rRNA subunits. The base composition of the mitogenome is A (29.79%), T (35.22%), C (11.93%), and G (23.07%), with a GC content of 35.38% (Table 1). The annotated mitogenome has been submitted to NCBI (GenBank accession number KU748128).

Table 1.

Mitochondrial genome organization of Tethya sp.

Name From To Direction Length (bp)
trnF (gaa) 35 107 + 73
rrnS 111 1363 + 1253
trnG (tcc) 1458 1529 + 72
trnV (tac) 1648 1719 + 72
rrnL 1739 4392 + 2654
trnE (ttc) 4505 4576 + 72
nad6 4580 5131 + 552
trnY (gta) 5161 5232 + 72
trnM (cat) 5300 5371 + 72
cox2 5424 6086 + 663
trnL (taa) 6134 6216 + 83
trnK (ttt) 6313 6384 + 72
atp8 6447 6599 + 153
atp6 6897 7418 + 522
trnR (tct) 7463 7535 + 73
cox3 7548 9330 + 783
trnN (gtt) 8361 8432 + 72
cob 8520 9653 + 1134
trnS (gct) 9682 9755 + 74
trnI (gat) 9789 9861 + 73
trnQ (ttg) 9915 9986 + 72
trnW (tca) 10,036 10,106 + 71
atp9 10,245 10,478 + 234
nad4 10,675 11,958 + 1284
trnH (gtg) 12,048 12,120 + 73
trnD (gtc) 12,159 12,230 + 72
nad3 12,334 12,663 + 330
trnR (tcg) 12,797 12,867 + 71
nad4l 12,907 13,158 + 252
cox1 13,299 14,840 + 1542
trnS (tga) 14,991 15,071 + 81
nad1 15,187 16,149 + 963
trnP (tgg) 16,230 16,302 + 73
trnL (tag) 16,463 16,536 + 74
trnC (gca) 16,602 16,673 + 72
trnT (tgt) 16,685 16,757 + 73
trnM (cat) 16,840 16,910 + 71
nad2 17,268 18,179 + 912
nad5 18,522 20,282 + 1761
trnA (tgc) 20,322 20,394 + 73
trnM (cat) 20,445 20,516 + 72

Direction: “+” stands for 5′ to 3′, “−” stands for 3′ to 5′.

In Tethya sp., the arrangement of protein-coding genes and gene contents was completely identical to that of T. actinia. After multiple sequence alignment with other mitogenomes of demosponges by MAFFT (Katoh & Standley 2013), we constructed a phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) using Maximum Likelihood (ML) method in MEGA 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013). The phylogenetic result indicated that Tethya sp. converged well with Tethya actinia, which further verified the morphological result. In conclusion, mitogenome studies of sponges may contribute to a better phylogenetic understanding of demosponges, subsequently influencing the knowledge of molecular evolution of metazoa.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The consensus phylogenetic relationship of Tethya sp. and the other species of Demospongiae as well as Aurelia aurita (a kind of jellyfish) from Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis with 1000 bootstrap. The number on the branches are the bootstrap values for ML. The Genbank accession numbers of each species are shown in the brackets.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Huilong Ou, Dr. Jing Zhao and all the members from sponge laboratory of Xiamen University for sample collection and intellectual advice.

Disclosure statement

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper and have no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This work was funded by the frontier project of China Ocean Mineral Resources R & D Association (DY125-22-QY-18) and Scientific Research Project of Xiamen Southern Ocean Center (grant: 13GYY002NF07, 14CZP039HJ13).

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT. 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nature Genetics. 25:25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G. 2008. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity (Edinb). 101:301–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kanehisa M. 1997. A database for post-genome analysis. Trends Genetics. 9:375–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M. 2006. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:D354–D357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:D277–D280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lavrov DV, Forget L, Kelly M, Lang BF. 2005. Mitochondrial genomes of two demosponges provide insights into an early stage of animal evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1231–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. 2008. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics. 24:713–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X, Shi Z, Li Y, Li S, Shan G, Kristiansen K. 2010. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 20:265–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magrane M, Consortium U. 2011. UniProt knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford). Mar 29;2011:bar009. doi: 10.1093/database/bar009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN. 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 4:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 278:631–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson T, Carson J. 2001. Rapid, high-throughput extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from selective-enrichment culture media . Lett Appl Microbiol. 32:326–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES