Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2017 Dec 7;2(2):915–917. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2017.1413309

Chloroplast genome of the wild tuber-bearing diploid potato relative Solanum chacoense

Kwang-Soo Cho a, Jang-Gyu Choi a, Ji-Hong Cho a, Ju-Sung Im a, Young-Eun Park a, Su-Young Hong a, Tae-Ho Park b,
PMCID: PMC7799535  PMID: 33474034

Abstract

Solanum chacoense is a wild tuber-bearing species belonging to Solanaceae family. The chloroplast genome of the species was completed by de novo assembly using a small amount of whole genome sequencing data. The genome is the circular DNA molecule with a length of 155,532 bp containing 159 predicted genes totally, including 105 protein-coding, 45 tRNA and eight rRNA genes. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis with 26 species in Solanaceae revealed that S. chacoense is the most closely grouped with S. commersonii.

Keywords: Chloroplast, genome, genome sequence, Solanum chacoense


Solanum chacoense is a wild tuber-bearing species originating from Bolivia and a relative to the cultivated potato, S. tuberosum (Hawkes 1990). Because of its importance in several desirable characteristics including resistance to crucial diseases and harmful insects such as late blight (Park et al. 2009), bacterial wilt (Chen et al. 2013, 2016), potato leaf roll virus (Brown and Thomas 1993), common scab (Braun et al. 2017), Colorado potato beetle (Sinden et al. 1980; Molnár et al. 2017), the species has been used for potato breeding. However, the two species are sexually incompatible because of different endosperm balance numbers (EBNs) and ploidy levels of the genomes, with S. chacoense and S. tuberosum reported as diploid and tetraploid with EBN values of 2 and 4, respectively (Johnston et al. 1980; Ortiz and Ehlenfeldt 1992; Cho et al. 1997). It caused that somatic hybridization of the two species has been attempted for breeding and importance to obtain sequence information of chloroplast in potato breeding program has increased (Chen et al. 2013, 2016; Cho and Park 2016; Molnár et al. 2017)

The S. chacoense (PI201846) was provided by Highland Agriculture Research Institute, South Korea. An Illumina paired-end (PE) genomic library was constructed with total genomic DNA according to the PE standard protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq2000 at Macrogen (http://www.macrogen.com/kor/). Low-quality bases with raw scores of 20 or less were removed and approximately 4.7 Gbp of high quality of PE reads were assembled by a CLC genome assembler (CLC Inc, Rarhus, Denmark) (Kim et al. 2015). Principal contigs representing the chloroplast genome were retrieved from the total contigs using Nucmer (Kurtz et al. 2004) with the chloroplast genome sequence of S. commersonii (KM489054) as the reference sequence (Cho et al. 2016). The representative chloroplast contigs were arranged in order based on BLASTZ analysis (Schwartz et al. 2003) with the reference sequence and connected to a single draft sequence by joining overlapping terminal sequences. Chloroplast genes were predicted using DOGMA (Wyman et al. 2004) and BLAST searches.

The complete chloroplast genome of S. chacoense (GenBank accession no. MF471371) was 155,532 bp in length including 25,592 bp inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) regions separated by small single copy (SSC) region of 18,376 bp and large single-copy (LSC) region of 85,972 bp with the typical quadripartite structure of most plastids, and the structure and gene features were typically identical to those of higher plants. A total of 159 genes with an average size of 582 bp were annotated including 106 protein-coding genes with an average size of 762 bp, 45 tRNA genes and 8 rRNA genes. An overall GC content was 37.89%.

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using chloroplast coding sequences of S. chacoense and 25 published species in Solanaceae family by a maximum-likelihood method in MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013). According to the phylogenetic tree, S. chacoense belonged to the same clade in Solanum species as expected, and interestingly, it was most closely grouped with S. commersonii (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of S. chacoense with 25 species belonging to the Solanaceae based on chloroplast protein-coding sequences. Numbers in the nodes are the bootstrap values from 1000 replicates.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

References

  1. Braun SR, Endelman JB, Haynes KG, Jansky SH.. 2017. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to common scab and cold-induced sweetening in diploid potato. Plant Genome. 10. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.10.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown CR, Thomas PE.. 1993. Resistance to potato leafroll virus derived from Solanum chacoense: characterization and inheritance. Euphytica. 74:51–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen L, Guo X, Xie C, He L, Cai X, Tian L, Song B, Liu J.. 2013. Nuclear and cytoplasmic components of Solanum tuberosum + S. chacoense somatic hybrids and three SSR alleles related to bacterial wilt resistance. Theor Appl Genet. 126:1861–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen L, Guo X, Wang H, Xie C, Cai X, He L, Zhou J, Liu J.. 2016. Tetrasomic inheritance pattern of the pentaploid Solanum chacoense (+) S. tuberosum somatic hybrid (resistant to bacterial wilt) revealed by SSR detected alleles. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture. 127:315–323. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho HM, Kim-Lee HY, Om YH, Kim JK.. 1997. Influence of endosperm balance number (EBN) in interploidal and interspecific crosses between Solanum tuberosum dihaploids and wild species. Korean J Breed. 29:154–161. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho KS, Cheon KS, Hong SY, Cho JH, Im JS, Mekapogu M, Yu YS, Park TH.. 2016. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Solanum commersonii and its application to chloroplast genotype in somatic hybrids with Solanum tuberosum. Plant Cell Rep. 35:2113–2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho KS, Park TH.. 2016. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Solanum nigrum and development of markers for the discrimination of S. nigrum. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 57:69–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hawkes JG. 1990. The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. London, UK: Belhaven Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnston SA, den Nijs TP, Peloquin SJ, Hanneman Jr RE.. 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Thero Appl Genet. 57:5–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim K, Lee SC, Lee J, Lee H, Joh HJ, Kim NH, Park HS, Yang TJ.. 2015. Comprehensive survey of genetic diversity in chloroplast genomes and 45S nrDNAs within Panax ginseng species. PLoS One. 10:e0117159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL.. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Molnár I, Besenyei E, Thieme R, Thieme T, Aurori A, Baricz A, Banciu HL. Rakory-Tican. 2017. Mismatch repair deficiency increases the transfer of antibiosis and antixenosis properties against Colorado potato beetle in somatic hybrids of Solanum tuberosum + S. chacoense. Pest Manag Sci. 73:1428–1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ortiz R, Ehlenfeldt MK.. 1992. The importance of endorsperm balance number in potato breeding and the evolutino of tuber-bearing Solanum species. Euphytica. 60:105–113. [Google Scholar]
  14. Park TH, Vleeshouwers VGAA Jacobsen E, van der Vossen E, Visser RGF.. 2009. Molecular breeding for resistance to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): a perspective and cisgensis. Plant Breeding. 128:109–117. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwartz S, Kent WJ, Smit A, Zhang Z, Baertsch R, Hardison RC, Haussler D, Miller W.. 2003. Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res. 13:103–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sinden SL, Sanford LL, Osman SF.. 1980. Glycoalkaloids and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle in Solanum chacoense Bitter. Am Potato J. 57:331–343. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamura K, STecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S.. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL.. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 20:3252–3255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES