Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2016 Feb 1;1(1):74–75. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2015.1137830

Complete mitochondrial genome of the Sakhalin nine-spined stickleback Pungitius tymensis (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae)

Takahito Shikano 1, Baocheng Guo 1, Juha Merilä 1,
PMCID: PMC7799693  PMID: 33473414

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome of the Sakhalin nine-spined stickleback Pungitius tymensis was determined using Illumina paired-end sequencing of genomic DNA. The genome sequence was 16 481 bp in length, consisting of 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, two ribosomal RNA genes and a control region. The content and arrangement of the genes were identical to those of other Gasterosteidae species. P. tymensis was phylogenetically positioned with other Pungitius species (P. kaibarae, P. pungitius and P. sinensis) with a clear distinction from them. Nucleotide identity in the 37 genic regions ranged from 94.7% to 94.9% between P. tymensis and the other Pungitius species.

Keywords: Gasterosteidae, genome, mtDNA, Pungitius tymensis


The teleost fishes in the genus Pungitius have become popular model species in ecology and evolutionary biology (Merilä 2013). Although their phylogenetic positioning and affinities relative to other genera within the Gasterosteidae are now well established (Kawahara et al. 2009), the phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic statuses of many Pungitius species are still debated (Keivany & Nelson 2000; Mattern 2007). One of the enigmatic species, sometimes also recognized as a subspecies of P. pungitius (Keivany & Nelson 2000), is the Sakhalin nine-spined stickleback, P. tymensis. Recent studies based on partial mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fragments support its deep phylogenetic divergence from other Pungitius fishes (Bae & Suk 2015; Wang et al. 2015), but further insights to its evolutionary history could be gained with access to its complete mitochondrial genome.

P. tymensis was collected from Hokkaido Island, Japan (43°50′N, 145°05′E). A total of 9.7 million reads were generated from the genomic DNA using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform with 100 paired-end strategy and aligned against the P. sinensis mitochondrial genome (Hwang et al. 2012a) using bwa-0.5.10 (Li & Durbin 2009). Mean sequence coverage across the mitochondrial genome was 40-fold, and all parts of the genome, except for two short regions (15 and 27 bp), had at least one-fold coverage (72.5% with ≥ 20-fold coverage). To fill sequence gaps in the two regions, direct sequencing was performed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products obtained using two primer sets (L-Thr [Takahashi & Goto 2001] and PPCR607 [Wang et al. 2015]; PNADH-F, 5′-GTTGCCTTCTTAACACTTCTTG-3′ and PNADH-R, 5′-AGTTGGTCGTATCGAAATCG-3′), according to the procedures described in Teacher et al. (2011). The consensus sequence of the P. tymensis mitochondrial genome was constructed using SAMtools 1.2 (Li et al. 2009) with manual checking.

The complete mitochondrial genome of P. tymensis is 16 481 bp in length (GenBank Accession No. KU255082, including 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes and a control region. The content and arrangement of the genes were identical to those of other Gasterosteidae species (Miya et al. 2001; Kawahara et al. 2009; Hwang et al. 2012a,b). An incomplete stop codon was observed in four (ND2, COII, ND4 and Cytb) out of the 13 protein-coding genes. The overall base composition of the entire mitochondrial genome was 27.2% for A, 26.4% for T, 17.6% for G and 28.8% for C. The phylogenetic position of P. tymensis in Gasterosteidae fishes was investigated based on the 37 genes (15 582 bp in total) with a maximum-likelihood approach using RAxML v.8.0 (under the GTR + GAMMA model, 37 gene partitions and 100 thorough bootstrap replicates; Stamatakis 2014). P. tymensis was phylogenetically positioned together with other Pungitius species (i.e., P. kaibarae, P. pungitius and P. sinensis) with a clear phylogenetic distinction from them (Figure 1). Nucleotide identity across the 37 genic regions ranged from 94.7% to 94.9% between P. tymensis and the other Pungitius species.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A maximum-likelihood tree inferred from 37 mitochondrial genes among nine Gasterosteidae and an outgroup (Aulorhynchus flavidus) species. Bootstrap support is indicated at nodes. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in brackets.

Acknowledgements

We thank Pekka Ellonen, Laura Häkkinen, Tiina Hannunen, Kirsi Kähkönen, and Sami Karja for help with laboratory and bioinformatic work. The sequencing was conducted at Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Funding information

This study was supported by grants (108601 & 118673) from the Academy of Finland.

References

  1. Bae HG, Suk HY.. 2015. Population genetic structure and colonization history of short ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius kaibarae). Ecol Evol. 5:3075–3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hwang DS, Song HB, Lee JS.. 2012a. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Amur stickleback Pungitius sinensis (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA 23:293–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hwang DS, Song HB, Lee JS.. 2012b. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Amur stickleback Pungitius kaibarae (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA 23:313–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kawahara R, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Near TJ, Nishida M.. 2009. Stickleback phylogenies resolved: evidence from mitochondrial genomes and 11 nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 50:401–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keivany Y, Nelson JS.. 2000. Taxonomic review of the genus Pungitius, ninespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). Cybium 24:107–122. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li H, Durbin R.. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mattern MY. 2007. Phylogeny, systematics and taxonomy of sticklebacks In: Östlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA, (eds) Biology of the three-spined stickleback. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Merilä J. 2013. Nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius): an emerging model for evolutionary biology research. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1289:18–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miya M, Kawaguchi A, Nishida M.. 2001. Mitogenetic exploration of higher teleostean phylogenies: a case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 18:1993–2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30:1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takahashi H, Goto A.. 2001. Evolution of East Asian ninespine sticklebacks as shown by mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 21:135–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Teacher AG, Shikano T, Karjalainen ME, Merilä J.. 2011. Phylogeography and genetic structuring of European nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius)-mitochondrial DNA evidence. PLoS One 6:e19476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang C, Shikano T, Persat H, Merilä J.. 2015. Mitochondrial phylogeography and cryptic divergence in the stickleback genus Pungitius. J Biogeogr. 42:2334–2348. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES