Table.
Research | Examples |
---|---|
Measure patients’ skills and interests in using digital health tools. | Understanding health and digital literacy oftarget users is critical to interpreting study results. |
Use mixed-methods studies to determine usability and uptake. | User-centered design of portals will require gathering qualitative data about perceived barriers as well as observational evidence of navigational challenges. |
Tailor portal interface and outreach to reach broad groups of patients, families, and caregivers. | Consider using audiovisual formats for data presentation to improve comprehension across literacy levels; translate tools into languages other than English. |
Study the combination of digital tools with human support. | Initial in-person training and ongoing support can increase digital tool use; greater integration into existing provider and staff workflows will also reinforce patient support in using the tools. |
Reporting | |
Incorporate implementation frameworks. | Frameworks such as RE-AIM may be particularly suited to understand processes and contextual factors that influence patient and caregiver use as well as provider and staff use. |
Emphasize external validity alongside internal validity. | Report how and whether the approach could be tested in new or different populations. |
Report effectiveness and use from multiple viewpoints. | Consider investigating a broader set of stakeholders in digital health research, including caregivers, peers, providers, staff, and system leadership. |
RE-AIM = reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.