Abstract
The short ninespine stickleback, Pungitius kaibarae, is a small gasterosteid species complex containing three geographical lineages: ND, NE and SE. Here, complete mitochondrial genomes of these three lineages were analyzed to estimate the genetic differentiation among them and to identify their phylogenetic placement in genus Pungitius. Although the overall genome structure was identical among those three lineages, the genome sizes were slightly different from each other, ranging from 16,489 to 16,500 bp. Upon robust phylogenetic tree inferred by Bayesian algorithm, ND and SE showed relatively higher affinity, and those three lineages formed a monophyletic group with Russian P. tymensis, clearly supporting previous studies
Keywords: Pungitius kaibarae, short ninespine stickleback, divergence time, phylogenetics, gasterosteid
Short ninespine stickleback, Pungitius kaibarae, is a small gasterosteid fish, native to the east coast on the Korean Peninsula, the southeast tip of Russia (Bae and Suk 2015) and northern west coast in Honshu (Japan; Takahashi et al. 2016). On the Korean Peninsula, this species is observed in three geographically separated regions: NE, SE and ND (Bae and Suk 2015). In genetic analyses using mitochondrial and microsatellite loci, a substantial differentiation was detected among those three regional populations (Bae and Suk 2015). We characterized the complete mitochondrial genomes of those three geographical lineages and performed phylogenetic examination using their mitochondrial genomes to estimate the genetic differentiation among them and to identify their phylogenetic placement in genus Pungitius. Genomic DNA was extracted from the fin clips collected from three different localities (NE: Yeongok River, E37°84′70.87′′, N128°81′06.73′′; SE: Hyeongsan River, E35°90′29.04′′, N129°25′86.75′′; ND: Nakdong River, E36°01′81.80′′, N128°97′93.17′′; Bae and Suk 2015). The fish and genomic DNA samples were stored in collection storage at the Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University as the voucher numbers, YUSS552 – −554 and YUSS-PK01 – −03, respectively. The mitochondrial genomes were amplified using the primers designed based on the congeneric complete genomes stored in NCBI and were commercially sequenced on an ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The fragment sequences were assembled to consensus mitochondrial genomes using Geneious v6.05 (Kearse et al. 2012; http://www.geneious.com).
The loci were annotated using MITOS web server (Bernt et al. 2013) and the complete mitogenome sequences were deposited at NCBI GenBank under the accession numbers KY628301, KY628302 and KY628303. The whole sequences of NE, SE and ND were 16,500, 164,090 and 16,489 bp, respectively, and included 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, 22 transfer RNA genes and 2 non-coding regions (OL and D-loop). Every protein-coding gene contained ATG start codon with a single exception in COX1 starting with GTG. Incomplete stop codon with single nucleotide T was detected at three coding genes, COX2, Cytb and ND4. The origin of L-strand (OL) was detected in the cluster of five tRNA genes, with being located between tRNAAsn and tRNACys. The gene arrangement of three mitogenomes was identical to those observed in other Pungitius species (Kawahara et al. 2009; Hwang et al. 2012a, 2012b; Guo et al. 2016a, 2016b; Shikano et al. 2016a, 2016b).
The evolutionary relationship among P. kaibarae lineages and the phylogenetic placement of this complex within genus Pungitius were inferred based on 13 protein-coding and 2 rRNA genes using BEAST2 (Bouckaert et al. 2014) implemented following the parameter setting and time calibration described in Wang et al. (2015). The overall topology was nearly identical to those constructed in previous studies (Bae and Suk 2015; Wang et al. 2015; Takahashi et al. 2016), despite slight differences in the timing of divergence among major clades. In the tree, ND individuals showed relatively higher phylogenetic affinity to SE than NE (Figure 1). P. kaibarae complex formed a monophyletic group with Russian P. tymensis, indicating that three lineages originated from the southward migration (Bae and Suk 2015). Our study may be useful to reconstruct the consensus phylogenetic tree that is essential for the future study of biogeographic dispersal and geographic isolation of these lineages.
Figure 1.
Bayesian inference tree reconstructed using mitochondrial genomes of genus Pungitius, based on the parameter setting and time calibration described in Wang et al. (2015). NCBI GenBank accession numbers were indicated for the data retrieved.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
- Bae HG, Suk HY.. 2015. Population genetic structure and colonization history of short ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius kaibarae). Ecol Evol. 5:3075–3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF.. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ.. 2014. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 10:e1003537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo B, Shikano T, Wang C, Merilä J.. 2016a. Complete mitochondrial genomes of the smooth tail nine-spined sticklebacks Pungitius laevis (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA B. 1:70–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo B, Shikano T, Vukić J, Šanda R, Merilä J.. 2016b. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Ukrainian nine-spined stickleback Pungitius platygaster (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA B. 1:68–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang DS, Song HB, Lee JS.. 2012a. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Amur stickleback Pungitius sinensis (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 23:293–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang DS, Song HB, Lee JS.. 2012b. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Amur stickleback Pungitius kaibarae (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 23:313–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawahara R, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Near TJ, Nishida M.. 2009. Stickleback phylogenies resolved: evidence from mitochondrial genomes and 11 nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 50:401–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28:1647–1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shikano T, Guo B, Merilä J.. 2016a. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Sakhalin nine-spined stickleback Pungitius tymensis (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA B. 1:74–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shikano T, Guo B, Vukić J, Šanda R, Merilä J.. 2016b. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Greek nine-spined stickleback Pungitius hellenicus (Gasterosteiformes, Gasterosteidae). Mitochondrial DNA B. 1:66–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahashi H, Møller PR, Shedko SV, Ramatulla T, Joen SR, Zhang CG, Sideleva VG, Takata K.. 2016. Species phylogeny and diversification process of Northeast Asian Pungitius revealed by AFLP and mtDNA markers. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 99:44–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Shikano T, Persat H, Merilä J.. 2015. Mitochondrial phylogeography and cryptic divergence in the stickleback genus Pungitius. J Biogeogr. 42:2334–2348. [Google Scholar]

