Abstract
The Siberian musk deer, Moschus moschiferus, is an Endangered species in South Korea due to its decreasing population size caused by illegal hunting and habitat destruction. In this study, the complete mitochondrial genome of M. moschiferus was determined using next-generation sequencing. Total length of its mitogenome is 16,356 bp in length, encoding 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, two ribosomal RNA genes, and one control region. Its AT contents are 62.4%, which are higher than its GC contents (37.7%) (A, 34.1%; C, 24.9%; G, 12.8%; and T, 28.3%). Phylogenetic relationship of genus Moschus showed topologies similar to those reported in previous studies. Sequence comparison between two M. moschiferus from South Korea indicated high sequence variations with 122 nucleotide differences. These results provide useful information necessary for further phylogenetic studies of Moschus species.
Keywords: Siberian musk deer, Moschus moschiferus, genome, mitochondrion
Siberian musk deer Moschus moschiferus is a species in genus Moschus, small deer-like ruminants have primitive features (Sathyakumar et al. 1993). Although the number of species in genus Moschus is controversial, seven species have been described: M. moschiferus, M. chrysogaster, M. berezovskii, M. anhuiensis, M. leucogaster, M. fuscus, and M. cupreus (Wilson and Mittermeier 2011). Among them, M. moschiferus occurs widely in Korea, Mongolia, Russia, China, and Kazakhstan (Tsendjav 2002). This species is classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN red list due to its continuously decreasing population caused by illegal hunting for musk and substantial habitat loss (Kang and Phipps 2003; Homes 2004; Nyambayar et al. 2015). Woo (1990) reported that the population size in South Korea is fewer than 40 individuals. To conserve this species, it is designated as a Class I Endangered species by Korean Ministry of Environment and a Natural Monument (No. 216) by Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea. In this study, we described the mitogenome of M. moschiferus using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to provide basic genetic information about this species.
A specimen (IN156) of M. moschiferus was collected from Hwacheon-gun, Gangwon-do, South Korea after obtaining permit of related regulation (from the Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea). It was deposited at National Institute of Biological Resources at Incheon, South Korea. Total genomic DNA was isolated from a muscle tissue sample using Genome Wizard Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacture’s instruction. Genomic DNA isolated from the sample was then sequenced using NGS (Hahn et al. 2013). NEXTflex™ Rapid DNA-Seq (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX) and Accel-NGS +2 PCR free kit (Swift Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI) were used to prepare sequencing libraries. The circular mitogenome of M. moschiferus is 16,356 bp in length, encoding 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, two ribosomal RNA genes, and one putative control region (D-loop region). A tandem repeat was not found in the D-loop region. Overall base compositions for A, C, G, and T in this mitogenome were 34.1, 24.9, 12.8, and 28.3%, respectively, with AT contents of 62.4%. Similar to typical vertebrate mitogenome, all genes in mitogenome of M. moschiferus are distributed in the H-strand except ND6 subunit gene and eight tRNAs that are encoded on the L-strand. The mitogenome of M. moschiferus generated in this study was deposited in GenBank under accession number KT337321.
For phylogenetic analyses of genus Moschus, 13 protein-coding genes from seven complete mitogenomes were retrieved from GenBank (Peng et al. 2009; Jang and Hwang 2010; Hassanin et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2013; Zhu et al. 2013; Pan et al. 2015) and edited with Geneious Pro v11.0.2 (Biomatters; Kearse et al. 2012). MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) was used for whole-genome alignment. Phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) was reconstructed using Neighbour-Joining (NJ) method by MEGA 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Phylogenetic relationships among four species of genus Moschus were consistent with the monophyletic pattern reported previously (Pan et al. 2015). Three haplotypes of M. moschiferus clustered in one clade. Interestingly, M. moschiferus (KT337321) in this study was remotely related to other sequences of M. moschiferus (FJ469675 and JN632662). A total of 122 and 102 of nucleotide differences were observed between KT337321 and other two haplotypes of M. moschiferus, FJ469675 and JN632662, respectively. This sequence comparison indicated relatively larger genetic polymorphism within M. moschiferus than that within other Moschus species (32 for M. chrysogaster and 18 for M. anhuiensis). These results will contribute to improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships of genus Moschus species and subspecies of M. moschiferus.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree for four species of Genus Moschus based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes. Bootstrap replicates were performed 5000 times. Numbers on nodes indicate bootstrap value. GenBank accession number of each species used for tree construction is listed after the species name. Aepyceros melampus (JN632592) and Bison bonasus (KX553934) were used as out-group species.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.
References
- Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B.. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads-a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:e129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassanin A, Delsuc F, Ropiquet A, Hammer C, van Vuuren BJ, Matthee C, Ruiz-Garcia M, Catzeflis F, Areskoug V, Nguyen TT, et al. 2012. Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes. C R Biol. 335:32–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homes V. 2004. No licence to kill: the population and harvest of musk deer and trade in musk in the Russian federation and Mongolia. Brussels (BE): Traffic Europe. [Google Scholar]
- Jang KH, Hwang UW.. 2010. Mitochondrial genome of the Korean musk deer Moschus moschiferus (Artiodactyla, Ruminantia, Moschidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 21:65–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang S, Phipps MJ.. 2003. A question of attitude: South Korea’s traditional medicine practitioners and wildlife conservation. Hong Kong: TRAFFIC East Asia. [Google Scholar]
- Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28:1647–1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyambayar B, Mix H, Tsytsulina K.. 2015. Moschus moschiferus The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T13897A61977573. Available from: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T13897A61977573.en [DOI]
- Pan T, Wang H, Hu C, Sun Z, Zhu X, Meng T, Meng X, Zhang B.. 2015. Species delimitation in the genus Moschus (Ruminantia: Moschidae) and its high-plateau origin. PLoS One. 10:e0134183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng H, Liu S, Zeng B, Zou F, Zhang X, Yue B.. 2009. The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii). J Nat Hist. 43:1219–1227. [Google Scholar]
- Sathyakumar S, Prasad SN, Walker S.. 1993. Status of captive Himalayan Forest musk deer Moschus c. chrysogaster in India. Int Zoo Yearbook. 32:32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S.. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0 . Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsendjav D. 2002. Mongolian Musk deer (Moschus moschiferus Linnaeus, 1758). Ulaanbaatar (MN): Jinst Cargana Co. Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Zhu X, Pan T, Meng X, Li C, Zhou L, Zhang B.. 2013. Mitochondrial genome of the Alpine musk deer Moschus chrysogaster (Artiodactyla: Ruminantia: Moschidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 24:487–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA, editors. 2011. Handbook of the mammals of the world. Vol.2 Hoofed mammals. Barcelona (ES): Lynx Edicions. [Google Scholar]
- Woo HC. 1990. The report of the rare and endangered species of mammals in Korea. Bull Korean Assoc Conserv Nat. 10:5–27. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu X, Shi W, Pan T, Wang H, Zhou L, Zhang B.. 2013. Mitochondrial genome of the Anhui musk deer (Moschus anhuiensis). Mitochondrial DNA. 24:205–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

