ABSTRACT
Background: The macrophage is an innate immune defense cell involved in pathogen recognition and clearance.
Aim: In view of the diversity of the macrophage phenotype and function, the present study investigated how Enterococcus faecalis infection affects the differentiation, phenotype and cytokine profile of macrophages.
Methods: Murine bone marrow-derived stem cells were co-cultured with E. faecalis before and after differentiation. Macrophage M0 polarization towards M1 or M2 was initiated at day 6 by addition of LPS and INF-γ, or IL-4 and IL-13, respectively.
Results: E. faecalis did not inhibit macrophage differentiation and were identified within macrophages. Viability of the macrophages infected with E. faecalis prior to differentiation was enhanced, evidenced by apoptosis inhibition, as was expression of CD38 and IRF5 proteins, indicators of M1-like polarization. These M1-like macrophages expressed an aberrant cytokine mRNA profile, with reduction in inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-12 and increase in regulatory cytokine IL-10. No changes in TNF-α or TGF-β1 were detected, compared with the control groups. This atypical M1-like phenotype was retained even upon stimulation with growth factors that normally trigger their development into M2 macrophages.
Conclusions: These findings suggested that E. faecalis infection of bone marrow-derived stem cells during differentiation into macrophages induces an atypical M1-like phenotype associated with intracellular bacterial survival.
KEYWORDS: Apoptosis, Enterococcus faecalis, infection, intracellular, macrophage, plasticity
Introduction
Enterococcus faecalis are facultative anaerobic Gram-positive cocci that colonize the human gastrointestinal tract. These bacteria do not cause deleterious effects in healthy individuals. However, by disrupting the host immune response, E. faecalis can enter the bloodstream and spread to different body parts. In immunocompromised individuals, this may result in life-threatening diseases such as meningitis, endocarditis, serious wound infection or urinary tract infection [1]. Because of their virulence factors and ability to form biofilms, E. faecalis can survive in harsh conditions such as hypoxia and resist eradication by antimicrobial agents, ultraviolet light irradiation, acids, alkalis or high temperature [2,3]. Enterococcus faecalis utilize cytolysin (hemolysin/bacteriocin), aggregation substance, surface adhesins, gelatinase or protease, sex pheromones and lipoteichoic acid for survival, interacting with other bacteria and modulating the immune response of their host [4,5].
From a dental perspective, E. faecalis is attributed to the failure of root canal-treated teeth and the emergence of post-treatment secondary infections [6]. E. faecalis has been identified in 4 to 40% in cases with primary endodontic infections, a higher frequency was reported in cases with unhealed periapical lesions. Other studies showed the prevalence of E. faecalis in endodontically treated teeth with periapical infections to range from 24 to 77% [7]. Some reports showed that E. faecalis was the only microorganism found in the root filled teeth with periapical infections [8]. The persistence of periapical infections after root canal treatment and how these bacteria overcomes the host immune response are still not widely explored.
The effect of E. faecalis on macrophages and their modulation of the immune system have been a topic of interest over the last few years [9]. Macrophages are one of the frontline defense cells of the human immune system. They are critical to both acute and resolving immune responses. Upon infection, circulating monocytes are recruited to the site of infection where they differentiate into macrophages and/or dendritic cells. Macrophages are activated into a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype upon recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns derived from the bacteria, via Toll-like receptors present on their surfaces. Macrophages with this phenotype secrete inflammatory cytokines that aid in the phagocytosis of pathogens and activation of T cells [10]. Prior to the discovery of the phenotypic heterogeneity of macrophages, it was believed that macrophages have only a pro-inflammatory role in innate immunological defense [11]. With the advent of the macrophage polarization concept, it is now known that macrophages have a dual role in inflammation. These cells exhibit remarkable plasticity, which enables them to adapt to different functional programs in response to the nature of the cytokines present at the infection microenvironment. In the presence of INF-γ secreted by T helper-type 1 (Th-1) cells and/or lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) derived from the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, macrophages differentiate into the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype that is destined for pathogen recognition and phagocytosis. In the presence of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and/or IL-13 secreted by T helper-type 2 (Th-2) cells, macrophages are polarized into the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype. The M2 macrophages have different subtypes, most of which are involved in wound healing and resolution of inflammation [12]. It is now believed that a continuum of tissue macrophage polarization states exists. These cells are overlapping with each other in terms of gene expression and function in response to a plethora of environmental stimuli [13].
Enterococcus faecalis can survive within macrophages for long periods after infection [14] because of their resistance to phagosome acidification and autophagy inhibition [15]. They have been reported to inhibit apoptotic cell death of macrophages to facilitate their continuous survival [16]. These bacteria also delay wound healing after infection. This may be attributed to suppression of the host immune response, increase in bacterial titer and colonization of the wound surfaces [9,10].
To date, the effect of E. faecalis on macrophage polarization during their differentiation is not entirely understood. Accordingly, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of prolonged infection of macrophage precursors with E. faecalis on macrophage polarization. The rationale for infecting macrophages for longer than 24 h was to emulate the clinical scenario of chronic infection. The cytokine profiles secreted by the differentiated macrophages were also examined to see if they were typical of M1 and M2 lineages. The null hypothesis tested was that prolonged E. faecalis infection of macrophage precursors has no effect on the phenotype of the differentiated macrophages and their cytokine expression profile.
Materials and methods
Murine bone marrow-derived stem cells and macrophage differentiation
Stem cell retrieval from mice and other procedures performed in the study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Augusta University (protocol #2013-0586). At day 0, the tibia and fibula of 9–11-week-old C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were extracted after euthanasia of the animals by CO2 asphyxiation. Cells were collected from the bone marrow by inserting the tip of a short-length 27-gauge needle into the bone ends. The retrieved cells were cultured in Rosewell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 100 μL/mL β-mercaptoethanol (complete medium; Gilbo, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Red blood cells were removed with ACK lysis buffer (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The remaining cells were washed twice, counted and placed into tissue culture dishes. Each dish received a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL of complete medium. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA, USA; 10 ng/mL) was added to induce the differentiation of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) into macrophages. The cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 8 days, with replenishment of the complete medium and M-CSF every three days [17]. Floating cells were discarded during medium change, leaving cells that adhered well to the culture dishes.
Macrophage polarization was initiated at day 6 by supplementing the replenished medium with growth factors according to the type of macrophage to be generated. For naïve macrophages (M0), only M-CSF was added to the medium. For M1 activation from M0, 100 ng/mL of LPS (MilliporeSigma, MO, USA) and 50 ng/mL INF-γ (Miltenyi Biotec) were added to the medium. For M2 activation from M0, 10 ng/ml of IL-4 and 10 ng/ml of IL-13 (Miltenyi Biotec) were added to the medium. The activation factors were added 24 h prior to analysis [17].
Bacterial preparation and infection of BMSCs
Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29,212; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in sterile brain heart infusion broth (Bacto™ Brain Heart Infusion, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and kept in an aerobic chamber for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Infection of BMSCs during differentiating into macrophages (pre-M0 + E. faecalis) was performed at day 0 with multiplicity of infection (MOI; ratio of bacteria to infection target) of 1 via adjusting the bacteria density to 108 cells/mL using an ultraviolet/visible light spectrophotometer (BioMate™ 3S, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at an optical density of 1 at 600 nm. Infection was maintained throughout the study by adding an additional dose of E. faecalis at day 6 with the same MOI. The rationale of using an MOI of 1 was to mimic chronic infection for a prolonged time with a low quantity of bacteria; a similar MOI was used for examining E. faecalis infection of BMSC-derived dendritic cells [18]. Infection of the already differentiated macrophages (post-M0 + E. faecalis) was performed at day 6 with an MOI of 1, to correlate and compare the effect of E. faecalis on macrophages before and after their differentiation. The effects of the M1 and M2 environment on the pre-M0 + E. faecalis were analyzed at day 6. Twenty-four hours prior to analysis, INF-γ and LPS were added to the medium for M1 activation. Likewise, IL-4 and IL-13 were added for M2 activation.
Ultrastructure of E. faecalis uptake by differentiating macrophages
At day 7, pre-M0 + E. faecalis at day 0 were collected by dissociating the adherent cells from the culture dishes and centrifuged. The cell pellet was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide, stained en bloc with 2% uranyl acetate, dehydrated with a graded ethanol series and embedded in epon-araldite resin. Seventy nanometer thick sections were prepared, collected on copper grids and stained with 2% uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate. The stained sections were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM 1230, JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA, USA) at 110 kV and imaged with an UltraScan 4000 CCD camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA).
Bacteria uptake by differentiated macrophages
After 8 days of macrophage culture in complete medium with differentiating factors, M0 macrophages were infected with E. faecalis, labeled with 10 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester [CFSE; eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific]) as reported [19], at an MOI of 1 for 6 h. The CFSE-E. faecalis were added to the M0 macrophages at a cell density of 5 × 105 and kept in the aerobic chamber at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere for 6 h. The macrophages were visualized with a bright field in the video mode to monitor bacteria uptake by endocytosis, using a Zeiss LSM 780 inverted confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
Flow cytometry
The macrophages were collected at day 7 by applying Cell Dissociation Buffer Enzyme-Free, PBS (Gibco) to the adherent cells. The dissociated cells were centrifuged and the cell pellet was re-suspended twice in Flow Cytometry Staining Buffer (Invitrogen). The macrophages were then incubated with the corresponding fluorophore-conjugated antibody (see next paragraph) at the manufacturer’s recommended concentration for 30 min each. Data were acquired using the Analyzer Flow Cytometer (MACSQuant®, Miltenyi Biotec) and analyzed using the MACSQuantify software (Miltenyi Biotec).
The CD11b antibody (anti-mouse, VioBlue, monoclonal; REA592) and the F4/80 antibody (anti-mouse, allophycocyanin (APC), monoclonal; REA126) were used as markers for macrophage differentiation. The CD38 antibody (anti-mouse, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), monoclonal; REA616) was used as the marker for M1 polarization. The EGR2 antibody (anti-mouse, phycoerythrin (PE), monoclonal; REA869) was used as the marker for M2 polarization [20]. All flow cytometry antibodies were acquired from Miltenyi Biotec (REAfinity™ recombinant antibodies).
The effect of E. faecalis on macrophage apoptosis was examined using Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Set PE-Cyanine7 (eBioscience). The macrophages were suspended in 1 x binding buffer and treated with fluorochrome-conjugated Annexin V. The cells were incubated in the dark for 15 min at ambient temperature. Acquired data were analyzed using a flow cytometer and its accompanying software (Miltenyi Biotec).
Real time-polymerase chain reaction
The RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to isolate total ribonucleic acid (RNA) from the macrophages according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the cell pellet was disrupted by adding an appropriate volume of Buffer RLT. Ethanol was added to the lysate and mixed well. The sample was then transferred to an RNeasy Mini spin column placed in a 2 mL collection tube. Contaminants were washed away after binding of the total RNA to the spin column. High-quality RNA was then eluted using 30 μL of RNAse-free water. The purity and concentration of the isolated RNA were evaluated using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 1000 UV-VIS Spectrophotometer and software Ver.3.8.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The RNA was reverse-transcribed to complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Master Mix kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were then placed in VeritiTM 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
TaqMan gene expression primers specific for the IL-1β gene (Mm00434228_m1), TNF-α (Mm00443258_m1), IL-12 (Mm01288989_m1), TGF-β 1 (Mm01178820_m1) and IL-10 (Mm01299386_m1) were employed for analysis by quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The experiment was conducted using a StepOnePlusTM RT-PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Acquired data were normalized against β-actin, analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method and expressed as relative fold changes.
Western blot
The effect of prolonged infection by E. faecalis on macrophage polarization was examined at the protein level using Western blot. This was achieved by analyzing the protein expression of Interferon Regulatory Factor 5 (IRF5), which increases with M1 polarization [21]. Proteins were extracted from the macrophages at day 7 by adding lysis buffer (RIPA buffer) to the cells. The cell lysate was incubated on ice for 20 min. Protein extraction was performed using 5–14% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Protein Gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The extracted proteins were transferred to polyvinylidine difluoride membranes (MilliporeSigma). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-Buffered Saline-Tween (TBST) buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C with IRF5 rabbit monoclonal primary antibodies (E914Z, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:1,000. The membranes were washed in TBST buffer and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibodies for 1 h. The separated proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Clarity Western ECL Substrate, Bio-Rad) and imaged using the ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
Statistical analyses
All experiments were repeated at least three times. Data were tested for their normality and homoscedasticity assumptions prior to the use of parametric statistical methods. One‑way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multi-group comparison. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Tukey test. Student T-test was used for comparison of two groups (GraphPad Prism version 7.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Statistical significance was pre-set at α =.05.
Results
Enterococcus faecalis infects macrophages and localizes within their cytoplasm
Enterococcus faecalis were identified within macrophages retrieved at day 6 (Figure 1 (Ai)). Some appeared engaged in replication (binary fission) within the cytoplasm of the macrophages (Figure 1 (Aii-iv)). Bacterial uptake by differentiated macrophages after 6 h of infection was detected by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 1 (Bi,ii)). Video recording showed phagocytosis of bacteria by the macrophages (Supplementary video). Enterococcus. faecalis did not have any adverse effect on macrophage differentiation, evidenced by a high level of macrophage marker expression (CD11b and F4/80; 96–99.5%), with no significant difference among the seven groups (P = .39; Figure 2(a,b)).
Inhibition of apoptosis in macrophages infected by E. faecalis prior to their differentiation
Enterococcus faecalis-infected BMSCs prior to differentiation (pre-M0 + E. faecalis) showed a significant decrease in the expression of the apoptosis marker Annexin V at day 7. This observation was consistent in all pre-M0 + E. faecalis macrophage groups. However, macrophages that were infected by E. faecalis after their differentiation (post-M0 + E. faecalis) had a significantly higher percentage of a cell population that was positive to Annexin V (Figure 3(a,b); P < .0001).
Enterococcus faecalis shifts macrophage polarization to the M1-like phenotype
To detect the effect of E. faecalis infection on macrophage polarization, the expression of CD38; marker for M1 macrophages and EGR2; marker for M2 macrophages were examined using flow cytometry analysis [20]. Cells expressing CD38+ Egr2− are considered macrophages of the M1-like phenotype, while cells expressing CD38− Egr2+ are considered macrophages of the M2-like phenotype. The results showed that when macrophages were infected with E. faecalis before differentiation (pre-M0 + E. faecalis) or after differentiation (post-M0 + E. faecalis), the infected cells showed a shift in polarization towards the M1-like phenotype where the expression of CD38 was significantly high in all the infected groups in relation to the control groups (Figure 4(a,b); P < .0001), with a very low expression of Egr2 (Figure 5(a,b); P < .0001). These results were consistent in all the infected groups. No significant difference was detected when ‘pre-M0 + E. faecalis’ were exposed to the M1 environment (i.e., pre-M0 + E. faecalis + LPS and INF-γ) or the M2 environment (i.e., pre-M0 + E. faecalis + IL-4 and IL-13).
Interferon Regulatory Factor 5 (IRF5) protein expression which is highly expressed in M1 macrophages was measured via western blotting to confirm the shift of macrophage polarization toward an M1-like phenotype after E. faecalis infection [21]. Significantly higher expression of IRF5 was identified in the M1 control groups as well as in the infection groups (Figure 6(a,b); P < .0001).
Infected macrophages showed aberrant expression of inflammatory cytokines
Analysis of inflammatory cytokines gene expression was performed for the M1 control groups to detect the inflammatory profile of the resultant M1-like macrophage phenotype that occurred after E. faecalis infection. Macrophages infected with E. faecalis on day 6 for 24 h (post-M0 + E. faecalis) exhibited a significant increase in all the inflammatory cytokines examined (P < .0001). However, long-term infection of macrophages prior to their differentiation with E. faecalis (pre-M0 + E.faecalis) showed an atypical inflammatory cytokine profile compared with that expressed by the control M1. This was evidenced by a significant reduction in the mRNA expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-12 (Figure 7(a,b); P < .0001). There was also a significantly higher expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Figure 7(e); P < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the expression of TGF-β1 and TNF-α between the infected M0 macrophages (pre-M0 + E. faecalis) and the control M1 macrophages (Figure 7(c,d)).
Discussion
Enterococcus faecalis is a commensal bacterium residing in the gastrointestinal tract and urinary tract of the human body. This bacterium can be highly pathogenic in certain conditions, such as in immunocompromised patients [22,23]. In addition, E. faecalis is frequently identified in failed root canal treatment with persistent apical periodontitis (i.e. chronic inflammation and destruction of the hard and soft tissues surrounding the root/s of a tooth caused by etiological agents of endodontic infection) [24]. Persistent apical periodontitis occurs when root canal treatment of apical periodontitis has not adequately eliminated infection within the root canal space. Although interactions between E. faecalis and macrophages have been investigated from different perspectives, information is lacking on the effect of prolonged E. faecalis infection on differentiating macrophages.
In the present study, E. faecalis were identified within the cytoplasm of macrophages that were infected prior to their differentiation, as well as in fully-differentiated macrophages infected by E. faecalis. These findings indicate that E. faecalis uptake by macrophages is independent of the stage of cellular differentiation. Previous investigations that utilized TEM to examine macrophages showed similar bacteria internalization [15].
Apparently, macrophage differentiation in terms of typical phenotypic markers was not affected by E. faecalis. Previous studies using different models of infection have reported variable results [9,16]. In the present study, E. faecalis was applied to BMSCs prior to their differentiation and maintained for 8 days. The objective of this “prolonged infection’ model was to mimic clinical conditions where monocytes migrate into a site of chronic infection. Conversely, fully-differentiated macrophages were exposed to E. faecalis for a short time only (i.e. 24 h), similar to the protocol used in other studies [16].
The apoptosis assay employed showed that E. faecalis infection of BMSCs prior to their differentiation into macrophages significantly reduced the apoptotic activity of the subsequently differentiated macrophages. Such a phenomenon has been reported as one of the strategies used by bacteria to survive within macrophages [25]. Maintaining the viability of infected macrophages enables bacteria to utilize the cells as vehicles for their translocation to different parts of the body and aids in spreading the infection [26]. Replication of the intravacuolar E. faecalis within the macrophages is suggestive of their robust survival potential and their ability to avoid destruction by preventing fusion of their encasing vacuoles with intracellular lysosomes [26,27]. Infection of fully-differentiated macrophages with E. faecalis for 24 h did not show the same effect on cellular apoptosis. This suggests potential differences in macrophage behavior according to the stage of differentiation.
Polarization of macrophages into the M1 (classical) or M2 (alternative) phenotype reflects differences in the nature of the environmental milieu, which may be the predominantly inflammatory (M1 state) or the homeostatic (M2 state) [28]. Intracellular bacterial infections can skew macrophages toward the M1 or M2 phenotype to increase their chance of intracellular survival [29]. In the present study, E. faecalis infection of macrophages caused polarization toward an M1-like phenotype, with a strong expression of CD38 and weak expression of EGR2. The IRF5 protein, a specific marker for M1 polarization that promotes macrophage differentiation into the inflammatory subtype [21,30–32], was highly expressed by the infected macrophages. Identification of the IRF5 protein is a more definitive indication of the M1-like macrophage phenotype. This finding is consistent with previous reports that enterococcal infection stimulates macrophages to polarize into the M1 phenotype through activation of the Toll-like receptor/Myeloid differentiation primary response 88/Microtubule associated protein kinase/Nuclear factor-kappa beta signaling pathways [22]. Macrophage polarization into the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype has been reported in bacterial infections involving Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella typhimurium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, salmonella and chlamydial infections [33–35]. Macrophages usually demonstrate plasticity between M1 and M2 subsets, where both phenotypes can transform into each other under different stimulations. Transformation of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype is required for inflammation resolution and healing [36]. In the present study, addition of M2 growth factors to the pre-M0 + E. faecalis (i.e., pre-M0 + E. faecalis + IL-4 and IL-13) did not affect macrophage polarization, which is suggestive of the inhibition of macrophage plasticity. This feature has been seen previously in diabetic mice, in which deterioration in macrophage function resulted in the cells remaining in the M1 polarization state [37].
Polarization toward the M1 phenotype by human and murine macrophages in response to infection is considered a critical protective mechanism. This is associated with the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines to activate the adaptive immune response [29]. A distinctive cytokine expression profile was identified in the present study when E. faecalis infection of the macrophages was initiated prior to their differentiation. Although no noticeable changes were found in the TGF-β1 and TNF-α expression in relation to the control groups, atypical reduction in the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-12 and the significantly higher expression of IL-10 may explain why E. faecalis could alter macrophage polarization into an aberrant M1-like phenotype. This altered functional phenotype may represent a previously-unreported intermediate state within the macrophage phenotypic spectrum, with an inclination toward the M1 side of the spectrum (i.e. M1-like macrophages) [28,38,39]. Interleukin-1β has been shown to have a protective role against microbial infections. This cytokine protects the host against invading pathogens through a cascade of events such as rapid recruitment of neutrophils to the site of infection, activation of endothelial adhesion molecules, stimulation of cytokine production and activation of adaptive immunity [40]. Inhibition of IL-1β production enhances the susceptibility of the host to bacterial infection, a mechanism utilized by some bacteria to overcome the host’s immune response [41]. Interleukin-12 a pro-inflammatory cytokine that links the innate and adaptive immune systems, induces the differentiation of Th-1 cells and activates natural killer cells, thereby protecting the host against infection [42]. Previous studies performed on IL-12 knockout mice reported an increase in the susceptibility of the mice to infection by intracellular pathogens that was caused by defective immune responses [43,44].
Unlike the two aforementioned cytokines, IL-10 is an immunosuppressive cytokine that downregulates the inflammatory immune response and protects the host tissue against the harmful effects of inflammation. However, over-production of this cytokine favors bacterial persistence due to the lack of clearance of the invading pathogens [45]. Production of IL-10 is more destructive to the host in case of intracellular bacterial infections [46]. These results provide insight into the persistence of E. faecalis infection and the resistance to inflammation resolution in E. faecalis-induced medical and dental conditions, including apical periodontitis [47]. Accordingly, the null hypothesis that ‘prolonged E. faecalis infection of macrophage precursors have no effect on the phenotype of the differentiated macrophages and their cytokine expression profile’ has to be rejected.
A realistic limitation of the present study is the divergence that exists between human and murine systems. Because of this diversity, the ideal way to understand human diseases is to perform research on human subjects or human cells. However, from a technical and an ethical point of view, mice may be considered excellent models to study diseases related to humans. Previous studies reported that mice and humans share a significantly high percentage of gene expressions; they also exhibit similarities in many physiological and pathological features [48,49]. This was the basis for the present study to be conducted on murine cells instead of human cells.
Conclusion
The present study was conducted to detect the effect of E. faecalis infection of macrophage precursors on the polarization and inflammatory cytokines profile of the resultant cells. Within the limits of the in vitro study, it may be concluded that early exposure to E. faecalis infection during macrophage differentiation does not prevent the expression of prototypic macrophage markers. Indeed, the viability of macrophages is increased, while induction of an aberrant M1 phenotype with an altered cytokine expression is evident. This aberrant phenotype is resistant to lineage-determining growth factors that, under normal circumstances, trigger their development into M2 macrophages. The plasticity of macrophages is restricted after infection of the macrophage precursors by E. faecalis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The authors deny any conflict of interest associated with this work. M. M. Elashiry’s study at Augusta University was funded by the Egyptian Cultural and Educational Bureau – Washington DC (Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Author contributions
Mohamed Mohamed Elashiry contributed to data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted the manuscript, and gave final approval. Fucong Tian contributed to data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, and gave final approval. Mahmoud Elashiry contributed to data acquisition and interpretation and gave final approval. Rana Zeitoun contributed to data analysis and interpretation and gave final approval. Ranya Elsayed contributed to data analysis and interpretation and gave final approval. Matthew Andrews contributed to data analysis and interpretation and gave final approval. Brian Bergeron critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. Christopher Cutler contributed to conception and design, critically revised the manuscript, and gave final approval. Franklin Tay contributed to conception and design, critically revised the manuscript, and gave final approval.
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.
References
- [1].Selleck EM, Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. Pathogenicity of enterococci. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7. 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0053-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Sava IG, Heikens E, Huebner J.. Pathogenesis and immunity in enterococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:533–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Torres C, Alonso CA, Ruiz-Ripa L, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. of animal origin. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0032-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Madsen KT, Skov MN, Gill S, et al. Virulence factors associated with Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a mini review. Open Microbiol J. 2017;11:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. Friend turned foe: evolution of enterococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:337–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, et al. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32:93–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr., Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod. 2004;30:315–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Hancock HH 3rd, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, et al. Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:579–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Chong KKL, Tay WH, Janela B, et al. Enterococcus faecalis modulates immune activation and slows healing during wound infection. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:1644–1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kumar V. Macrophages: the potent immunoregulatory innate immune cells. In: Macrophage at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. IntechOpen; 2019. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Gordon S, Plüddemann A, Martinez Estrada F. Macrophage heterogeneity in tissues: phenotypic diversity and functions. Immunol Rev. 2014;262:36–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Atri C, Guerfali FZ, Laouini D. Role of human macrophage polarization in inflammation during infectious diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Shapouri-Moghaddam A, Mohammadian S, Vazini H, et al. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6425–6440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Gentry-Weeks CR, Karkhoff-Schweizer R, Pikis A, et al. Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Infect Immun. 1999;67:2160–2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Zou J, Shankar N. The opportunistic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis resists phagosome acidification and autophagy to promote intracellular survival in macrophages. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:831–843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Zou J, Shankar N. Enterococcus faecalis infection activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling to block apoptotic cell death in macrophages. Infect Immun. 2014;82:5132–5142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ying W, Cheruku PS, Bazer FW, et al. Investigation of macrophage polarization using bone marrow derived macrophages. J Vis Exp. 2013;76:e50323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Elashiry MM, Elashiry M, Zeitoun R, et al. Enterococcus faecalis induces differentiation of immune-aberrant dendritic cells from murine bone marrow-derived stem cells. Infect Immun. 2020;88:e00338–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Tuominen-Gustafsson H, Penttinen M, Hytönen J, et al. Use of CFSE staining of borreliae in studies on the interaction between borreliae and human neutrophils. BMC Microbiol. 2006;6:92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Jablonski KA, Amici SA, Webb LM, et al. Novel markers to delineate murine M1 and M2 macrophages. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Weiss M, Blazek K, Byrne AJ, et al. IRF5 Is a specific marker of inflammatory macrophages in vivo. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:245804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Zou J, Shankar N. Roles of TLR/MyD88/MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways in the regulation of phagocytosis and proinflammatory cytokine expression in response to E. faecalis infection. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Giannakopoulos X, Sakkas H, Ragos V, et al. Impact of enterococcal urinary tract infections in immunocompromised - neoplastic patients. J BUON. 2019;24:1768–1775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Alghamdi F, Shakir M. The influence of Enterococcus faecalis as a dental root canal pathogen on endodontic treatment: A systematic review. Cureus. 2020;12:e7257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Zhang W, Lu Q, Dong Y, et al. Rv3033, as an emerging anti-apoptosis factor, facilitates Mycobacteria survival via inhibiting macrophage intrinsic apoptosis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Mitchell G, Chen C, Portnoy DA. Strategies Used by bacteria to grow in macrophages. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0012-2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Lewis ME, Belland RJ, AbdelRahman YM, et al. Morphologic and molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct growth patterns. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:723–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Mège JL, Mehraj V, Capo C. Macrophage polarization and bacterial infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:230–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Schneider A, Weier M, Herderschee J, et al. IRF5 is a key regulator of macrophage response to lipopolysaccharide in newborns. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Krausgruber T, Blazek K, Smallie T, et al. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Corbin AL, Gomez-Vazquez M, Berthold DL, et al. IRF5 guides monocytes toward an inflammatory CD11c+ macrophage phenotype and promotes intestinal inflammation. Sci Immunol. 2020;5:eaax6085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Chacón-Salinas R, Serafín-López J, Ramos-Payán R, et al. Differential pattern of cytokine expression by macrophages infected in vitro with different Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;140:443–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Jouanguy E, Döffinger R, Dupuis S, et al. Casanova J-L. IL-12 and IFN-γ in host defense against mycobacteria and salmonella in mice and men. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;11:346–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Rottenberg ME, Gigliotti-Rothfuchs A, Wigzell H. The role of IFN-gamma in the outcome of chlamydial infection. Curr Opin Immunol. 2002;14:444–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Das A, Sinha M, Datta S, et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:2596–2606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Khanna S, Biswas S, Shang Y, et al. Macrophage dysfunction impairs resolution of inflammation in the wounds of diabetic mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Chávez-Galán L, Olleros ML, Vesin D, et al. Much more than M1 and M2 macrophages, there are also CD169(+) and TCR(+) macrophages. Front Immunol. 2015;6:263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Orecchioni M, Ghosheh Y, Pramod AB, et al. Macrophage polarization: different gene signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. classically and M2(LPS-) vs. alternatively activated macrophages. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Sahoo M, Ceballos-Olvera I, Del Barrio L, et al. Role of the inflammasome, IL-1β, and IL-18 in bacterial infections. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:2037–2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ratner D, Orning MP, Starheim KK, et al. Manipulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 production by Yersinia pestis effectors YopJ and YopM and redundant impact on virulence. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:9894–9905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:133–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Hamza T, Barnett JB, Li B. Interleukin 12 a key immunoregulatory cytokine in infection applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:789–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Teng MW, Bowman EP, McElwee JJ, et al. IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines: from discovery to targeted therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Nat Med. 2015;21:719–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Peñaloza HF, Schultz BM, Nieto PA, et al. Opposing roles of IL-10 in acute bacterial infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016;32:17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Peñaloza HF, Noguera LP, Riedel CA, et al. Expanding the current knowledge about the role of interleukin-10 to major concerning bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Zhang C, Du J, Peng Z. Correlation between Enterococcus faecalis and persistent intraradicular infection compared with primary intraradicular infection: a systematic review. J Endod. 2015;41:1207–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Rosenthal N, Brown S. The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:993–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Justice MJ, Dhillon P. Using the mouse to model human disease: increasing validity and reproducibility. Dis Model Mech. 2016;9:101–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.