Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0243292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243292

Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of enhanced cold tolerance through ROS scavenging in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

Wenbo Mi 1, Zigang Liu 1,*, Jiaojiao Jin 1, Xiaoyun Dong 1, Chunmei Xu 1, Ya Zou 1, Mingxia Xu 1, Guoqiang Zheng 1, Xiaodong Cao 1, Xinling Fang 1, Caixia Zhao 1, Chao Mi 1
Editor: Maoteng Li2
PMCID: PMC7802968  PMID: 33434207

Abstract

Two winter rapeseed cultivars, “NS” (cold tolerant) and “NF” (cold sensitive), were used to reveal the morphological, physiological, and proteomic characteristics in leaves of plants after treatment at -4°C for 12 h(T1) and 24 h(T2), and at room temperature(T0), to understand the molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance. Antioxidant activity and osmotic adjustment ability were higher, and plasma membrane injury was less obvious, in NS than in NF under cold stress. We detected different abundant proteins (DAPs) related to cold tolerance in winter rapeseed through data-independent acquisition (DIA). Compared with NF, A total of 1,235 and 1,543 DAPs were identified in the NSs under T1 and T2, respectively. Compared with NF, 911 proteins were more abundant in NS only after cold treatment. Some of these proteins were related to ROS scavenging through four metabolic pathways: lysine degradation; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; flavonoid biosynthesis; and ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis. Analysis of these proteins in the four candidate pathways revealed that they were rapidly accumulated to quickly enhance ROS scavenging and improve the cold tolerance of NS. These proteins were noticeably more abundant during the early stage of cold stress, which was critical for avoiding ROS damage.

Introduction

Cold temperatures have adverse effects on the growth and development of plants [1]. Winter rapeseed (Brassica napus) is one of the few crop species able to survive frosty winters in temperate regions [2]. However, only strong cold-tolerant cultivars can survive frigid winters, while cultivars with only slight cold tolerance often wither during winters [3]. Plants originating from temperate regions frequently encounter low temperatures in the early spring and late autumn; furthermore, perennial or overwintering crops, such as holly [4], winter wheat [5] and winter rape [2], normally experience cold stress while overwintering. Plants have evolved several mechanisms to adapt to low temperatures, including cold-adapted regulation in physiological, biochemical, and molecular processes [6].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate in plants under cold stress [7]. For example, levels of hydrogen peroxide were more than triple in winter rapeseed under cold stress for 72 h than plants at room temperature [2]. ROS content increased in both indica and japonica rice under cold stress, but the increase was lower in japonica rice compared with indica rice; in addition, significant differences in ROS-related metabolites were detected between these two types of rice [8, 9]. ROS have the janus function of inducing adaptability or producing peroxidative injury to organisms, which primarily depends on the levels of ROS in plants. High levels of ROS are toxic to cells, and low levels permit small increases that can trigger signaling pathways that induce responses among downstream genes and enhance adaptability under biotic and abiotic stress [10].

To assume their signaling roles, ROS must reach certain threshold levels to trigger downstream responsive factors in the signal pathway, while also preventing ROS content from passing the threshold that would cause oxidative damage [11]. Therefore, ROS levels must be tightly regulated by antioxidants: both antioxidase proteins (such as superoxide dismutase, SOD; peroxidase, POD; and catalase, CAT) and non-enzymatic substances (such as quercetin, flavonoids, tryptophan, betaine, and glutathione) contribute to metabolic pathways promoted by enzymatic proteins [10]. In winter rapeseed, the activity of SOD, POD, CAT, and APX was significantly increased to stabilize ROS at an appropriate level under cold stress [2]. ROS permit small increases that can induce the accumulation of downstream cold-responsive proteins and osmotic substances through the MKK6-MAPK3 cascade reaction in plants, thereby enhancing tolerance to cold stress [12, 13].

Proteins can directly affect phenotypes by controlling a series of molecular processes in plants, including signaling transduction pathways, the genic expression process, and secondary metabolic processes [14]. Proteins perform several biological functions, and their abundance depends on transcription and post-transcriptional translation [12]. Nevertheless, transcriptomics analysis has been used to identify different transcriptional genes in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) treated at various cold temperatures. Although genes might be transcribed, their transcription does not necessarily indicate that their corresponding proteins are present [15]. In other words, a high transcriptional level does not necessarily imply the existence of a biological phenotype. Therefore, comparative analysis at the proteomics level is essential for furthering our understanding of cold-tolerance mechanisms in plants.

High-throughput protein sequencing technology, including iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) and DIA (data-independent acquisition), have been widely used for the quantitative comparative analysis of proteomes and the identification of different abundant proteins (DAPs) of plants under various cold temperatures [16, 17]. In jojoba, quantitative proteomic analysis has shown that differentially accumulated proteins are closely associated with cold stress through various molecular processes, such as lipid metabolism and transport, adjustment of the cytoskeleton, and ROS scavenging. In addition, cold-regulated 47 factor and three other candidate proteins might play important roles in cold stress [6]. The molecular basis of cold-tolerance has been assessed by comparing proteomic divergence between two cultivars of winter turnip rape [14]. Furthermore, plant proteomes of many species have been analyzed to reveal cold-tolerance mechanisms [1821].

Under extremely low temperatures, winter turnip rape (Brassica rapa) is the only oil crop that can survive frosts during the winter in the northern region of China. However, winter oilseed rape was not able to overwinter in this region until strong cold-tolerant cultivars were bred by our research group from Gansu Agricultural University. “17NTS57” is currently the most cold-tolerant variety of oilseed rape, as it can survive temperatures as low as -26°C and has an overwintering rate above 90% without snow cover. Comparative proteomic analysis of the strong cold-tolerant variety “NS” is necessary for furthering our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cold tolerance, to identify key cold-responsive genes, and to provide a knowledge base that could be used to breed and improve the cold tolerance of winter rapeseed.

Results

Morphological and physiological responses to cold stress

Seedlings with 5~6 leaves of two cultivars (NS and NF) were cold treated at 4°C for 12 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) to study morphological and physiological responses to cold stress. Leaves are the most sensitive component of plants to cold stress as a consequence of their exposed position. Slight injuries were only present on the lower leaves of NS, but whole NF plants experienced severe dehydration under cold stress (Fig 1A). Activity of SOD, POD, and CAT was used to assess ROS-scavenging ability, soluble sugar, and soluble protein as osmotic regulative substances, while MDA content and conductivity were used to assess the degree of peroxidation in plants under cold stress. The activity of SOD, POD, CAT, and the content of soluble sugar and soluble protein was higher in NS than in NF under cold stress. In contrast, MDA content and relative conductivity were lower in NS than in NF under cold treatment for 12 h and 24 h. Specifically, MDA content in NF was more than two times greater than that in NS, and the relative conductivity of NF was 1.66 times greater than that of NS under cold stress for 12 h. These results suggest that more damage was present in NF after cold treatment for 12 h. This finding was also verified through observations of seedling morphology (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Morphological characteristics and physiological indexes of winter rapeseed seedling under cold stress and room tempareture condition.

Fig 1

(A) Morphological characteristics of NS and NF; (B) Physiological indexes of NS and NF under cold stress and room tempareture. Error bars denote standard error of the mean. Significant differences between various treatments at p ≤ 0.05 are denoted by a various lowercase.

Identification of DAPs using DIA technology

The DAPs between six samples from two varieties (NS and NF) at 4°C for 12 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) and room temperature (T0) as the control were identified and quantified using DIA and LC-MS/MS technology. Consequently, a total of 38804 precursors were produced, and 31042 unique peptides and 14002 proteins were identified with a false discovery rate less than 1% (S1 Table). Among these proteins, a total of 1978 DAPs in NST0_NFT0, 1235 DAPs in NST1_NFT1, and 1543 DAPs in NST2_NFT2 were identified based on the criteria of p < 0.05 for the adjusted p-value and greater than 1 for the log2 base of fold change (S2 Table). The bar charts reflect the number of more- and less-abundant DAPs between the two varieties under cold stress and in the control treatment. Under room temperature, 896 DAPs were more abundant and 1082 DAPs were less abundant in NS than in NF. After 12 h of cold stress, 724 DAPs were more abundant, and 511 DAPs were less abundant, in NS than in NF. Similarly, 452 DAPs were more abundant, and 1091 DAPs were less abundant, in NS than in NF after 24 h of cold stress. In addition, these results indicated that more proteins, along with the added accumulation of cold stress during early stages, were important for enhancing the cold tolerance of NS when the environmental temperature suddenly decreased (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. DAPs between two varieties at three cold-treatments of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus).

Fig 2

(A) Column diagram of the DAPs. (B) Venn diagrams of the DAPs between two varieties, showing the numbers of the overlaps or unique DAPs (left: more-abundance, right: less-abundance). (C) The heat maps showing DAPs accumulation in each group, color change from red to blue represented abundant change from more to little.

By comparing all of the DAPs between the two varieties at three treated time points, the Venn diagram shows the number of more- or less-abundant DAPs as well as specific and commonly abundant DAPs in the different groups(Fig 2B). A total of 1501 DAPs (635 more abundant and 866 less abundant) in NST0_NFT0, 824 DAPs (470 more abundant and 354 less abundant) in NST1_NFT1, and 1461 DAPs (437 more abundant and 1024 less abundant) in NST2_NFT2 were identified. Two common DAPs that were less abundant in NS were present in all treatments, while three DAPs were less accumulated in NS only under cold stress. A total of 470 more-abundant DAPs in NS were exclusively identified at 12 h of cold stress, while 437 more-abundant DAPs in NS were uniquely found at 24 h of cold stress. Four common DAPs that were more abundant in NS were identified at 12 h and 24 h of cold treatment but not under treatment at room temperature. These unique proteins, which showed more accumulation in NS only under cold conditions, appear to play an important role in improving the cold tolerance of winter rapeseed.

GO and KEGG pathway annotations for DAPs

To identify the different DAPs that play a role in the cold responses of the two varieties, we used GO analysis to functionally classify DEGs. These DAPs were divided into three categories of GO: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component (Fig 3; S3 Table). The significant enrichment terms were used to screen DAPs between the two varieties at three cold-treated time points. In NST0_NFT0, higher GO terms were associated with rhythmic process, metabolic process, growth, and multiply, which reflected the characteristic divergence between the two varieties (Fig 3A). In NST1_NFT1, 1235 DAPs were significantly enriched in 46 terms (Fig 3B), while 1543 DAPs were significantly enriched in 45 terms in NST2_NFT2 (Fig 3C). Some of these terms were related to the cold response, such as response to stimulus, signaling and signal transducer activity, antioxidant activity, biological regulation, transcription factors, and metabolic processes.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

GO enrichment analysis of DAPs between two varieties under cold stress for 12 h (B) and 24 h (C), and control treatment (A).

To annotate the functions of proteins, we conducted a pathway enrichment analysis of the DAPs in NST0_NFT0, NST1_NFT1, and NST2_NFT2 based on the KEGG database (Fig 4). In NST0_NFT0, 885 DAPs were significantly enriched in 7 pathways (corrected p < 0.05 and Q < 0.05) (Fig 4A). In NST1_NFT1, 583 DAPs were significantly enriched in 42 pathways (Fig 4B). In NST2_NFT2, 721 DAPs were significantly enriched in 30 pathways (Fig 4C). An additional comparative analysis indicated that four pathways—ko0400: phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis; ko00130: ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis; ko00941: flavonoid biosynthesis; and ko00310: lysine degradation—were common between NST1_NFT1 and NST2_NFT2, and these four pathways were not detected in NST0_NFT0. Further analysis showed that these four pathways were related to the cold response through the production of ROS scavengers. Thus, these four pathways were selected as candidate pathways for additional study.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

KO pathways enrichment analysis of DAPs between two varieties under cold for 12 h (B) and 24 h (C), and control treatment (A).

Identification of DAPs correlated to candidate pathways

A total of 80 and 68 DAPs that were detected in NST1_NFT1 and NST2_NFT2, respectively, were associated with the four candidate pathways. There were 44 common DAPs in T1 and T2, including 34 more-abundant DAPs that were involved in phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis; phenylalanine metabolism; flavonoid biosynthesis; and lysine degradation (Fig 5A; Table 1; S4 Table). These DAPs likely affected the cold resistance of winter rapeseed. After functionally annotating these proteins, we found that the DAPs represented 18 crucial enzymes (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. KO and GO annotation of DAPs in the candidate pathway correlated with cold tolerance of winter rapeseed.

Fig 5

A: the candidate pathway and DAP numbers in each candidate pathway. B: GO annotation of DAPs, numbers in histogram indicate number of DAPs.

Table 1. Candidate proteins from the four pathways associated with cold tolerance of winter rapeseed.

Pathway Common DAP KO id Annotation [EC no.] Fold (NST1/NFT1) Regulation Fold (NST2/NFT2) Regulation q-value
Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis XP_013728819.1 K00766 anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase(trpD)[EC:2.4.2.18] 2.46 Up 0.41 Down 0.00
XP_013676058.1 2.46 Up 0.41 Down 0.00
XP_013722305.1 1.74 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_013653143.1 K00815 tyrosine aminotransferase(TAT)[EC:2.6.1.5] 1.87 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_013718039.2 1.74 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_013657201.1 K01658 anthranilate synthase component II(trpG)[EC:4.1.3.27] 1.62 Up 0.00
XP_022545953.1 1.62 Up 0.00
XP_022565834.1 K01735 3-dehydroquinate synthase(aroB)[EC:4.2.3.4] 1.52 Up 0.00
XP_013661385.1 1.52 Up 0.00
XP_013640777.1 K13832 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase(aroDE)[EC:1.1.1.25] 2.30 Up 0.54 Down 0.00
XP_013726187.1 K14454 aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic(GOT1)[EC:2.1.6.6] 0.50 Down 2.30 Up 0.00
XP_013721995.1 11.31 Up 0.00
XP_013663182.1 2.30 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_013664180.1 K15849 bifunctional aspartate aminotransferase and glutamate(PAT)[EC:2.6.1.78] 2.00 Up 0.00
XP_013707917.2 2.00 Up 0.00
Flavonoid biosynthesis XP_022571603.1 K00487 trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase(CYP73A)[EC:1.14.13.11] 2.00 Up 0.38 Down 0.00
XP_022557738.1 2.00 Up 0.38 Down 0.00
XP_013683255.1 2.00 Up 0.38 Down 0.00
XP_013678442.1 K05278 flavonol synthase(FLS) [EC:1.14.11.23] 1.74 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_022562120.1 1.74 Up 0.47 Down 0.00
XP_013715671.1 2.83 Up 0.00
XP_013743978.1 K13065 shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT) [EC:2.3.1.133] 2.64 Up 0.23 Down 0.00
XP_013692583.1 2.64 Up 0.23 Down 0.00
Lysine degradation XP_013672989.1 K14085 aldehyde dehydrogenase family 7 member A1(ALDH7A1)[EC:1.2.1.31] 0.33 Down 3.48 Up 0.00
XP_013707249.1 K00128 aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+)(ALDH)[EC:1.2.1.3] 2.46 Up 0.00
XP_013745666.1 2.64 Up 0.00
XP_022565853.1 K00626 acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase(atoB)[EC:2.3.1.9] 0.38 Down 1.87 Up 0.00
XP_022550217.1 K14157 alpha-aminoadipic semialdehyde synthase(AASS)[EC:1.5.1.8] 0.38 Down 3.25 Up 0.00
Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis XP_013749046.1 K01904 4-coumarate—CoA ligase(4CL)[EC:6.2.1.12] 1.62 Up 0.00
XP_013723238.1 K00457 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase(HPD, hppD)[EC:1.13.11.27] 0.35 Down 3.73 Up 0.00
XP_013695640.1 0.35 Down 3.73 Up 0.00
XP_013723237.1 0.35 Down 3.73 Up 0.00
XP_013695641.1 0.35 Down 3.73 Up 0.00
XP_013719625.1 K09834 tocopherol cyclase(VTE1, SXD1)[EC:5.5.1.24] 1.62 Up 0.00

“-” means no significant differential-accumulation.

Validation of DAPs and their corresponding genes by qRT-PCR

To further verify the relationship between protein accumulation and the degree of transcription of corresponding genes, 23 DAPs were selected in the candidate pathways using high-throughput sequencing to detect the mRNA levels of their corresponding genes using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) (Fig 6; S5 and S6 Tables). The trends in expression of 21 selected genes were similar to the trends in the accumulation of their corresponding proteins. Two of the selected genes showed the opposite transcriptional pattern to patterns of accumulation of their corresponding proteins, which might be explained by differences in the fate of mRNA as a consequence of post-transcriptional regulation, such as mRNA turnover, translation rate, and translation.

Fig 6. Transcriptional level of selecting corresponding genes of DAPs between two varieties under cold stress.

Fig 6

The datas were shown as averages of three independent biological replicates±SD.*P<0.05,**P<0.01,***P<0.001.

In conclusion, we constructed a model describing how this candidate proteins are involved in cold resistance by mediating the ROS in plants (Fig 7). In this study, the abundance of FLS, trpD and ALDH proteins was significantly higher in NS under cold stress; FLS is a synthase catalyzing the biosynthesis of quercetin. Quercetin is one of the most important products of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and is a highly active non-enzymatic scavenger of ROS. TrpD can catalyze the conversion of anthranilate to tryptophan, and tryptophan can enhance the activity of SOD and GSH-PX as well as suppress the accumulation of MDA. The formation of butyro-betaine, the precursor of betaine, via ALDH catalysis is necessary for ensuring a sufficient supply of betaine, which is a non-enzymatic ROS scavenger that participates in the cold-tolerant pathway of winter rapeseed.

Fig 7. Differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) related to ROS scavenged under cold stress of winter rapeseed.

Fig 7

Numbers and abbreviations of key enzymes are shown in red and blue text, respectively. Three small squares on a line represented three cold treatments, and color change from green to red meaning DAP accumulative level change from high to low. Arrow with line indicated synthetic direction, line ending with a bar indicated suppressive producing.

Discussion

Winter rapeseed is not only an important oilseed crop but also an important winter cover crop. Wind erosion on farmland is severe because of the dry climate in northern China, and the cover that it provides to farmland can generate major ecological benefits by suppressing wind erosion. However, low overwinter survival rate due to low temperatures and frost is one of the major challenges of cultivating winter rapeseed in this region. Improving the cold tolerance of cultivars is critical to the successful overwintering of winter rapeseed. Therefore, there is an urgent need to study the cold tolerance mechanisms of winter oilseed rape [2].

Plants, including winter rapeseed, exposed to cold conditions during the early spring and late autumn, or extremely low temperatures generally during the winter, are damaged as evidenced by the presence of ROS accumulation, membrane rigidification, protein destabilization, metabolic disequilibrium, and the formation of ice crystals in the extracellular and intracellular space [6]. Major crop species that originated from temperate regions, including winter wheat, rye, and winter rapeseed, have evolved complex mechanisms to adapt to and survive in low-temperature conditions (Shi et al. 2018). ROS play vital roles in mechanisms underlying the cold response and in early cold-signaling perception and transduction [7]. ROS produced in plants have janus functions [10], primarily by causing peroxidative damage and inducing the cold response to enhance cold tolerance [8].

To prevent ROS from passing over their threshold and causing peroxide damage, ROS must be tightly regulated and maintained at an appropriate level [22]. For this reason, plants in cold regions have evolved antioxidases, including SOD, POD, CAT, and APX, and non-enzymatic scavengers, such as ascorbic acid and glutathione, to avoid the overaccumulation of ROS under cold stress [12]. In this study, the activity of antioxidases SOD, POD, and CAT was higher in the cold-tolerant variety NS than in NF under cold stress. Antioxidases are an induced-enzyme type; thus, their capacity to scavenge ROS can be improved by slightly increasing the availability of ROS as substrates. In contrast, increased antioxidase activity was able to maintain ROS within a suitable range. The higher activity of antioxidases in NS can better regulate ROS level, both avoiding damage caused by the accumulation of ROS and activating cold-signaling pathways to enhance cold tolerance. MDA content and relative conductivity were lower in NS than in NF under cold stress, indicating that the plasma membrane sustained less damaged by ROS peroxidation in NS—and this was most evident during the early stage of cold stress. These results revealed that the response to cold stress was more rapid and intense in NS, potentially explaining its increased cold tolerance.

DIA is a high-throughput analytical method widely used for proteomic analysis [16]. Compared with iTRAQ, DIA is a novel method for proteomic analysis with higher quantitative accuracy and more sensitivity for detecting low-abundant proteins [16]. In this study, DIA proteomic analysis was used to reveal the cold-tolerant molecular mechanism of winter rapeseed at the proteomic level. We have identified proteins with different abundances between the tolerant NS, the sensitive NF, and the control at both 12 h and 24 h of cold treatment. Compared with the cold-sensitive variety NF, 911 unique DAPs were more abundant only under cold stress in NS, including 470 unique DAPs in the T1 treatment (12 h under cold stress) and 437 unique DAPs in the T2 treatment (24 h under cold stress); furthermore, there were 4 common DAPs in the T1 and T2 treatments. These unique, more highly accumulated DAPs under cold treatment can confer increased cold tolerance to NS. Moreover, more highly abundant DAPs were identified under cold-treatment at 12 h than at 24 h. These results suggest that the early cold response of NS was more rapid and intense.

From a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, 583 DAPs were significantly enriched in 42 pathways under cold treatment for 12 h, and 721 DAPs were significantly enriched in 30 pathways under cold treatment for 24 h. We have selected four common pathways in the T1 and T2 treatments, and 54 DAPs, including 34 more-abundant DAPs, were annotated in four candidate pathways related to the cold response by affecting the ROS-scavenging process: phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis (ko00400); flavonoid biosynthesis (ko00941); lysine degradation (ko00310); and ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis (ko00130). Some products from the four candidate pathways, such as quercetin [22], flavonoids [23], betaine [24, 25], and tryptophan [10], are important metabolites that act as ROS scavengers via antioxidative reactions in vivo.

Essentially, the phenotypes of plant traits are the result of various metabolic processes. Cold tolerance of plants is a complex quantitative trait, and its formation is associated with intricate metabolic processes [3]. ROS-scavenging metabolism is important for improving cold tolerance, including phenylalanine metabolism, flavonoid metabolism, and ubiquinone metabolism. Quercetin is one of the most important products of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and is a highly active non-enzymatic scavenger of ROS [22, 23, 26]. In this study, the abundance of FLS protein was significantly higher in NS under cold stress; FLS is a synthase catalyzing the biosynthesis of quercetin [27]. Other metabolites, such as flavonol, which is an antioxidant, were produced by catalysis of FLS synthase [28]. Similarly, trpD abundance was distinctly increased in NS under cold stress [29]. TrpD can catalyze the conversion of anthranilate to tryptophan, and tryptophan can enhance the activity of SOD and GSH-PX as well as suppress the accumulation of MDA. The formation of butyro-betaine, the precursor of betaine, via ALDH catalysis is necessary for ensuring a sufficient supply of betaine [30], which is a non-enzymatic ROS scavenger that participates in the cold-tolerant pathway of winter rapeseed. The abundance of SOD and CAT was significantly increased in NS. Therefore, we hypothesize that these proteins may play a crucial role in the ROS-scavenging process related to cold tolerance in winter rapeseed.

Methods

Plant materials, cold stress treatment and physiological

The '17NTS57' (abbreviated as “NS,” cold-tolerant, greater than 90% survival rate under −26°C during overwintering) and 'NQF24' (abbreviated as “NF,” cold-sensitive, with a 0% overwintering rate) winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties were used in this study; these varieties were provided by Liu Pro from Gansu Agricultural University (Lanzhou, China). Seedlings were grown in plastic pots until they have six leaves in a climate room at 20°C under a 14 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. For cold stress treatment, the seedlings were placed into a freezing chamber at -4°C for 12 h (treatment 1, T1) and 24 h (treatment 2, T2), and without treatment as the control (CK or T0). Subsequently, the leaves of plants were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Each sample was pooled from three plants, and three biological replicates were conducted. The activity of SOD, POD, and CAT were estimated following the procedures of Zhang et al. [31]. Relative electrolyte leakage (REL) was determined by a digital conductometer DDS11A (Leici Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China) according to Bajji et al [32]. MDA, soluble sugar, and free proline content were measured according to the methods of Yang et al. [33], Buysse et al. [34], and Bates et al. [35], respectively.

Protein extraction

The total proteins of the leaves from each sample were extracted. Samples were ground to power in liquid nitrogen and then dissolved in 2mL of lysis buffer (8 M urea, 2% SDS, 1×Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Ltd. Basel, Switzerland)), followed by sonication for 30 min on ice and centrifugation at 13 000 rpm for 30min at 4°C. The supernatant was then transferred to a fresh tube. For each sample, proteins were precipitated with ice-cold acetone at -20°C overnight. The precipitations were cleaned with acetone three times and re-dissolved in 8 M urea by sonication on ice. Protein quality was determined using SDS-PAGE.

Protein digestion

A BCA Protein Assay Kit was used to determine the protein concentration of the supernatant. Fifty μg proteins extracted from leaves were suspended in 50 μL of solution, was concentrated by adding 1ul of 1 M dithiotreitol at 55°C for 1 h, and was alkylated by adding 5 ul of 20 mM iodoacetamide in the dark at 37°C for 1 h. The sample was then precipitated using 300 ul of prechilled acetone at -20°C overnight. The precipitate was washed twice with cold acetone and was resuspended in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Finally, the proteins were digested with sequence-grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) at a substrate/enzyme ratio of 50:1 (w/w) at 37°C for 16 h.

High PH reverse phase separation

The peptide mixture was re-dissovled in buffer A (buffer A: 20 mM ammonium formate in water, pH 10.0, adjusted with ammonium hydroxide), and was then fractionated by high pH separation using an Ultimate 3000 system (Thermo Fisher scientific, MA, USA) connected to a reverse-phase column (XBridge C18 column, 4.6mm × 250 mm, 5 μm, (Waters Corporation, MA, USA). High pH separation was performed using a linear gradient from 5% B to 45% B over 40 min (B: 20 mM ammonium formate in 80% ACN, pH 10.0, adjusted with ammonium hydroxide). The column was re-equilibrated at the initial condition for 15 min. The column flow rate was maintained at 1mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 30°C. Ten fractions were collected; each fraction was dried in a vacuum concentrator for the following step.

DDA: Nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis

The peptides were re-dissolved in 30 μL of solvent C (A: 0.1% formic acid in water) and analyzed by on-line nanospray LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to a Nano ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). Ten μL of peptide sample was loaded onto the trap column (Thermo Fisher Scientific Acclaim PepMap C18, 100 μm × 2 cm), with a flow of 300 nL/min and subsequently separated on the analytical column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 μm × 15 cm) with a set gradient. The column flow rate was maintained at 500 nL/min with a column temperature of 40°C. An electrospray voltage of 2.1 kV versus the inlet of the mass spectrometer was used.

The mass spectrometer was run under the data dependent acquisition mode and was automatically switched between MS and MS/MS modes. The parameters were as follows: (1) MS: scan range (m/z) = 350–1200; resolution = 120000; AGC target = 500000; maximum injection time = 60 ms; include charge states = 2–6; Filter Dynamic Exclusion: exclusion duration = 30 s; (2) HCD-MS/MS: resolution = 50,000; AGC target = 1000000; maximum injection time = 100 ms; collision energy = 35%; stepped CE = 5%.

Database search

Raw data of the DDA were processed and analyzed by Spectronaut Pulsar 11.0 (Biognosys AG). Pulsar was set up to search the database of UniProt assuming that trypsin was the digestion enzyme. Carbamidomethylation (C) was the fixed modification, And oxidation (M) was the variable modifications.

DIA: Nano-HPLC-MS/MS analysis

The peptides were re-dissolved in 30 μL of solvent C (A: 0.1% formic acid in water) and analyzed by on-line nanospray LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) coupled to a Nano ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA). Ten μL of peptide sample was loaded onto the trap column (Thermo Fisher Scientific Acclaim PepMap C18, 100 μm × 2 cm), with a flow of 300 nL/min and was subsequently separated on the analytical column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 μm × 15 cm) with a set gradient. The column flow rate was maintained at 500 nL/min with a column temperature of 40°C. An electrospray voltage of 2.1 kV versus the inlet of the mass spectrometer was used.

The mass spectrometer was run under data dependent acquisition mode and was automatically switched between the MS and MS/MS modes. The parameters were as follows: (1) MS: scan range (m/z) = 350–1200; resolution = 120,000; AGC target = 500000; maximum injection time = 60 ms;; (2) HCD-MS/MS: resolution = 50,000; AGC target = 1000000; maximum injection time = 100 ms; collision energy = 35%; stepped CE = 5%.

Data analysis

Raw data of the DIA were processed and analyzed by Spectronaut Pulsar 11.0 (Biognosys AG) with default parameters (BGS Factory Settings (default)). After conducting a Student’s t-Test, different expressed proteins were filtered based on the following criteria: Q-value <0.05 and Absolute AVG (Average) log2 ratio>0.58.

Protein functional annotation and enrichment analysis

Proteins were annotated against the GO, KEGG and COG/KOG database to determine their functions. Significant GO functions and pathways were examined within differentially expressed proteins based on P≤0.05.

Total RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA in leaves was extracted per the manufacturer’s instructions (TIANGEN Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.), and RNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis. The RNA was reverse-transcribed per the manufacturer’s instructions (PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser, TaKaRa) to obtain single-chain cDNA. Three replicates were performed for each sample. After measuring the concentration, the cDNA was stored at -20°C. The primers used in real-time quantitative PCR are listed in S5 Table. The Actin gene (Accession ID: 106427432) was used as an internal reference, and the relative expression of each gene was analyzed by the 2-ΔΔCt method [36].

Concluding remarks

In this study, DIA-based proteomic technology was used to investigate the differential proteomics of two winter rapeseed cultivars (NS and NF of B. napus) at -4°C for 12 h (T1), 24 h (T2), and at room temperature (T0). A total of 1978 DAPs in NST0_NFT0, 1235 DAPs in NST1_NFT1, and 1543 DAPs in NST2_NFT2 were identified. We identified a total of 34 shared DAPs that were abundant in NST1_NFT1 and NST2_NFT2 but not in NST0_NFT0. Based on the functional analysis, these 34 proteins may improve the cold tolerance of winter rapeseed by regulating metabolic pathways related to ROS scavenging (namely, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis; flavonoid biosynthesis; lysine degradation; and ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis). Several candidate proteins (FLS, TrpD, ALDH, 4CL, GOT1, atoB, CA4H, and VTE1) related to antioxidants or scavengers may scavenge ROS to improve the cold tolerance of winter rapeseed. In addition, more proteins were more highly accumulated in NS in T1 but not in T2. Thus, the cold response appears to be more rapid and intense in NS than in NF, which might explain why NS is more cold resistant than NF.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Sequencing result data.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. DAPs in NST0_NFT0, NST1_NFT1, and NST2_NFT2.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed cold-related genes of NS and NF.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Candidate pathways and candidate proteins information.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Primer of qRT-PCR.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Candidate proteins information.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer: There are no copyright disputes.

Abbreviations

DAPs

Different abundant proteins

DIA

Data Independent Acquisition

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SOD

Superoxide dismutase

CAT

Catalase

APX

Ascorbate peroxidase

MDA

Malondialdehyde

POD

Peroxidase

SS

Soluble sugar

SP

Soluble protein

ASC

Ascorbic acid

GSH

Glutathione

Itraq

The isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification

MAS

Marker-assisted selection

GO

Gene ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

FLS

Flavonol synthase

VTE1

Naphthoate synthase

CA4H

Trans-cinnamate4-monooxygenase

4CL

4-coumarate—CoA ligase

GB

Glycine betaine

AtoB

Acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase

ALDH

Aldehyde dehydrogenase

TrpD

Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase

TAT

Tyrosine aminotransferase

GOT1

Aspartate aminotransferase, cytoplasmic

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660404), National Key Basic Research and Development Program (2018YFD0100500), University of Gansu Province Scientific Research Achievement Transformation and Cultivation Project (2018D-13), Special Fund for the Construction of Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System of Gansu Province (17ZD2NA016-4); Special funds for the central government to guide local technological development. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Liu JY, Shi YT, Yang SH. Insights into the regulation of C-repeat binding factors in plant cold signaling. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018; 60: 780–795. 10.1111/jipb.12657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu Z, Sun W, Zhao Y, Li X, Fang Y, Wu J. Effects of low nocturnal temperature on photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure of winter rapeseed. Russ J. Plant Physiol. 2016; 63: 451–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu Z, Dong X, Ma L, Sun W, Yang G, Fang Y, et al. Separation and identification of Brassica rapa BrAFP and its gene cloning and expression under freezing stress. Plant breed. 2019; 138: 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gimeno TE, Pías B, Lemos-Filho JP, Valladares F. Plasticity and stress tolerance override local adaptation in the responses of Mediterranean holm oak seedlings to drought and cold. Tree Physiol. 2009; 29: 87–98. 10.1093/treephys/tpn007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valitova J, Renkova A, Mukhitova F, Dmitrieva S, Beckett RP, Minibayeva FV. Membrane sterols and genes of sterol biosynthesis are involved in the response of Triticum aestivum seedlings to cold stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019; 142: 452–459. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gao F, Ma P, Wu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang G. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of the Response to Cold Stress in Jojoba, a Tropical Woody Crop. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019; 20 10.3390/ijms20020243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morales M, Munne-Bosch S. Oxidative stress: A master regulator of plant trade-offs? Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 996–999. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang J, Luo W, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Song S, Chong K. Comparative metabolomic analysis reveals a reactive oxygen species-dominated dynamic model underlying chilling environment adaptation and tolerance in rice. New Phytol. 2016; 211: 1295–1310. 10.1111/nph.14011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang S, Hong Y, Wang Z. Rice and cold stress: Methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci. Rice. 2014; 7: 12 10.1186/s12284-014-0012-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mittler R. ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22: 11–19. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jordan M, Chapman JK, Muhlemann, SR, Gayomba Gloria KM. RBOH-Dependent ROS Synthesis and ROS Scavenging by Plant Specialized Metabolites To Modulate Plant Development and Stress Responses. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019; 32: 370–396. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zeng X, Xu Y, Jiang J, Zhang F, Ma L, Wu D et al. iTRAQ-Based Comparative Proteomic Analysis of the Roots of Two Winter Turnip Rapes (Brassica rapa L.) with Different Freezing-Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19: 4077–4092. 10.3390/ijms19124077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo X, Liu D, Chong K. Cold signaling in plants: Insights into mechanisms and regulation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018; 60: 745–756. 10.1111/jipb.12706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu Y, Zeng X, Wu J, Zhang F, Li C, Jiang J, Wang Y, Sun W. iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Proteome Revealed Metabolic Changes in Winter Turnip Rape (Brassica rapa L.) under Cold Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19: 3346–3352. 10.3390/ijms19113346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He X, Ni X, Xie P, et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses revealed conserved and novel responses to cold and freezing stress in Brassica napus L. G 3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2019; 9: 2723–2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cho KC, Clark DJ, Schnaubelt M, Teo GC, Leprevost FV, Bocik W et al. Deep Proteomics using Two Dimensional Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020, 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhu W, Cheng X, Ren C, Chen J, Zhang Y, Chen Y et al. Proteomic characterization and comparison of ram (Ovis aries) and buck (Capra hircus) spermatozoa proteome using a data independent acquisition mass spectometry (DIA-MS) approach. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nelofer J, Ahmad QH, Vaseem R. Proteomics: A tool to decipher cold tolerance. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2019; 31: 183–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miki Y, Takahashi D, Kawamura Y, Uemura M. Temporal proteomics of Arabidopsis plasma membrane during cold- and de-acclimation. Journal of Proteomics. 2019; 197: 71–81. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J, Wang J, Wang X, Li R, Chen B. Proteomic response of hybrid wild rice to cold stress at the seedling stage. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: 1–22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shi X, Wang X, Cheng F, Cao H, Liang H, Lu J et al. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis of cold stress-induced mechanisms in grafted watermelon seedlings. J. Pro. 2019; 192: 311–320. 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu D, Hu MJ, Wang YQ, Cui YL, Antioxidant Activities of Quercetin and Its Complexes for Medicinal Application. Molecules. 2019; 24: 1–15. 10.3390/molecules24061123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Noratto GD, Kim Y, Talcott ST, Mertens-Talcott SU. Flavonol-rich fractions of yaupon holly leaves (Ilex vomitoria, Aquifoliaceae) induce micro RNA-146a and have anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive effects in intestinal myofribroblast CCD-18Co cells. Fitoterapia. 2011; 82: 557–569. 10.1016/j.fitote.2011.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Giris M, Dogru-Abbasoglu S, Soluk-Tekkesin M, Olgac V, Uysal M. Effect of betaine treatment on the regression of existing hepatic triglyceride accumulation and oxidative stress in rats fed on high fructose diet. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2018; 37: 563–570. 10.4149/gpb_2018005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Heidari R, Niknahad H, Sadeghi A, et al. Betaine treatment protects liver through regulating mitochondrial function and counteracting oxidative stress in acute and chronic animal models of hepatic injury. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018; 103: 75–86. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lesjak M, Beara I, Simin N, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives. J Funct Foods. 2018; 40: 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang B, Halttunen T, Raimo O, Price K, Kallio H. Flavonol glycosides in wild and cultivated berries of three major subspecies of Hippophaë rhamnoides and changes during harvesting period. Food Chem. 2009; 115: 657–664. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Peng X, Wu H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Qiu D, Zhang Z. Transcriptome profiling reveals candidate flavonol-related genes of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum under cold stress. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 687–689. 10.1186/s12864-019-6045-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yang R, Deng L, Zhang L, Yue X, Mao J, Ma F et al. Comparative Metabolomic Analysis of Rapeseeds from Three Countries. Meta. 2019; 9: 161–165. 10.3390/metabo9080161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mao Y, Chen N, Cao M, et al. Functional Characterization and Evolutionary Analysis of Glycine-Betaine Biosynthesis Pathway in Red Seaweed Pyropia yezoensis. Mar Drugs. 2019; 17: 70–76. 10.3390/md17010070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang A, Jiang M, Zhang J, Tan M, Hu X. Mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and acts downstream of reactive oxygen species production in leaves of maize plants. Plant Physiol. 2016; 141: 475–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bajji M, Kinet MK, Lutts S. The Use of the Electrolyte Leakage Method for Assessing Cell Membrane Stability as a Water Stress Tolerance Test in Durum Wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 2020; 36: 61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang A, Dai X, Zhang W. A R2R3-type MYB gene, OsMYB2, is involved in salt, cold, and dehydration tolerance in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2012; 63: 2541–2556. 10.1093/jxb/err431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Buysse J, Roel M. An Improved Colorimetric Method to Quantify Sugar Content of Plant Tissue. J. Exp. Bot. 1993; 267: 1627–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Stress Studies. Plant and Soil. 1997; 39: 205–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Maoteng Li

21 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-23256

Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of enhanced cold tolerance through ROS scavenging in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 05 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Maoteng Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[This work was supported by the National Natural Science

Foundation of China (31660404), National Key Basic Research and Development

Program (2018YFD0100500), University of Gansu Province Scientific Research

Achievement Transformation and Cultivation Project (2018D-13), Special Fund for

the Construction of Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System of Gansu

Province (17ZD2NA016-4).]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 [The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.]

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

5. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 7 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

7. Please upload a new copy of Figure 3 and 4 as the detail is not clear. Please follow the link for more information: https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/" https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/06/looking-good-tips-for-creating-your-plos-figures-graphics/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors reported two winter rapeseed cultivars, cold tolerant and cold sensitive, were used to reveal the morphological, physiological, and proteomic characteristics in leaves of plants after treatment at different temperature points. The candidate pathways of DAPs involved were analyzed and ROS scavenging pathway may play function in rapeseed cold tolerance. The paper is poorly displayed and following items should be modified.

1. The format of references is incorrect, please correct it.

2. The description of Result 2.2, “…identified based on the criteria of p < 0.005 for the adjusted p-value…”, is confused.

3. An obvious descriptive error existed in Methods 4.1, “…store at -80 reaching concentrations thaEach sample….”.

4. Abstract part, the first line, it is should be “cultivars” not “culvers”. It is recommended to find native English speaker to modify the language of the paper.

4. It is confused to understand if the proteomics performed with biological repetition?

Reviewer #2: In this work, the authors performed comparative proteomics analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of enhanced cold tolerance through ROS scavenging in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Although this work is interesting, the manuscript is not well organized, and the data are not well presented. Therefore, the paper needs to be thoroughly revised.

1. The authors must carefully proof-read the manuscript to minimize typographical, grammatical, and bibliographic errors. Some typographical errors, some nonsensical or confusing sentences should be corrected.

2. In Abstract, “Two winter rapeseed culvers, “NF” (cold tolerant) and “NS” (cold sensitive), were used to reveal the morphological, physiological, and proteomic characteristics……”. What does ‘culvers’ mean? ‘culvers’ or ‘cultivars’? Please check the spelling.

3. In Abstract, authors refer to two winter rapeseed culvers “NF” and “NS”, among, “NF” represent cold-tolerant cultivar and “NS” represent cold-sensitive cultivar. However, in Introduction and Methods parts, authors refer to “strong cold-tolerant variety “NS” and '17NTS57' (abbreviated as “NS”, cold-tolerant…) and 'NQF24' (abbreviated as “NF”, cold-sensitive…) winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). These seem to be particularly controversial. Please confirm and explain why?

4. In Plant materials, cold stress treatment and physiological part, authors say “the cold-tolerant variety ‘17NTS57’ beyond 90% survival rate under −26 °C of extreme low temperature during overwintering, please provide data supporting the result or cite the related references.

5. In results part, ‘(figure2B )’ should put it after the sentence ‘By comparing all of the DAPs between the two varieties at three treated time points, the Venn diagram shows the number of more- or less-abundant DAPs as well as specific and commonly abundant DAPs in the different groups.’

6. In general, the technical approaches of RT-qPCR seem fine. However, statistics for figure 6 are not given. Also, statistics for DAGs (real-time quantitative RT-PCR) abundance changes (eg p-values) are not given (not in method and not in legend). What method were used? ANOVA? One or two way? What was the level of significance?

7. Authors selected 23 DAPs for detecting the mRNA levels using qRT-PCR. However, the protein names are not given in figure 6 or in Result part. The protein names are replaced by Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5……

8. In Result part, no any information and sentences related to figure 7. Please add …..!

9. The results lack systematic in-depth analyses. Authors think cold-tolerant rapeseed enhance cold tolerance through ROS scavenging, but no related candidate proteins were in-depth analyzed and studied.

10. Figure quality is too low and the legends need to be reorganized and rephrased.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0243292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243292.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Oct 2020

We have carefully revised and checked the manuscript in accordance with the review comments to make the paper more complete and meet the requirements of the journal.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Maoteng Li

10 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-23256R1

Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of enhanced cold tolerance through ROS scavenging in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 25 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Maoteng Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors modified all the concerns we raised, I think it can be accepted with a minor revision.

1. Please write the full name for the abbreviation of AVG when it first appeared.

2. In methods part, the real-time quantitative PCR, “The Actin gene was used as an internal reference…..”, the accession number for the actin gene used should be listed in the paper.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0243292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243292.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


11 Nov 2020

First of all, and thanks the scholars who reviewed this manuscript for their valuable comments on this paper, thanks the responsible editor of the manuscript for your letter, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have carefully revised and checked the manuscript in accordance with the review comments to make the paper more complete and meet the requirements of the journal.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Maoteng Li

19 Nov 2020

Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of enhanced cold tolerance through ROS scavenging in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

PONE-D-20-23256R2

Dear Dr. Liu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Maoteng Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Maoteng Li

23 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-23256R2

Comparative Proteomics Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of Enhanced Cold Tolerance Through ROS Scavenging in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

Dear Dr. Liu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Maoteng Li

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Sequencing result data.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. DAPs in NST0_NFT0, NST1_NFT1, and NST2_NFT2.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed cold-related genes of NS and NF.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. Candidate pathways and candidate proteins information.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Table. Primer of qRT-PCR.

    (XLSX)

    S6 Table. Candidate proteins information.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES