Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2018 Dec 10;20(24):8064–8068. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03734

Direct Primary Amination of Alkylmetals with NH-Oxaziridine

Nicole Erin Behnke 1, Russell Kielawa 1, Doo-Hyun Kwon 2, Daniel H Ess 2, László Kürti 1,*
PMCID: PMC7803087  NIHMSID: NIHMS1614178  PMID: 30525689

Abstract

A method for the primary electrophilic amination of primary, secondary, and tertiary organometallic substrates from a bench-stable NH-oxaziridine reagent is described. This facile and highly chemoselective transformation occurs at ambient temperature and without transition metal catalysts or purification by column chromatography to provide alkylamine products in a single step. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that despite the basicity of alkylmetals, the direct NH-transfer pathway is favored over proton and O-transfer.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1614178-f0007.jpg


Aliphatic amines comprise an important class of compounds that have applications in pharmaceuticals, textiles, agrochemicals, and surfactants.1 Specifically, primary aliphatic amines are valuable targets for organic chemists as their functionality can be found throughout medicinally relevant compounds including those used in the treatment of diabetes and influenza (Figure 1).2

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Representative examples of primary aliphatic amines in pharmaceuticals.

Generally, primary aliphatic amines are prepared through the Gabriel synthesis3, Staudinger reaction4, reduction of nitro- groups5 or nitriles6, or SN2 reactions of alkyl halides. While these methods are well-studied7, our focus was to expand the scope of available synthetic routes for more difficult to access secondary and tertiary carbon systems and to investigate primary alkyl amine formation using umpolung, reversed polarity strategies. Compared to traditional approaches, protocols employing an electrophilic source of nitrogen for direct N-transfer to carbon-centered aliphatic nucleophiles have not been well established. Narasaka et al. demonstrated the two step electrophilic amination of alkyl and aryl Grignard reagents with O-sulfonyloximes to form amine salts.8 While synthetically valuable, the overall transformation requires harsh reaction conditions (i.e. strong acid, reflux temperatures, long reaction times) to remove the protecting group and liberate the amine salt. Alternatively, Vidal et al. showed the use of a protected oxaziridine for NBoc-transfer to alkyl and aryl diorganozinc reagents.9 However, this process is limited by substrate scope, generally low yields, and isolation of the protected instead of free amine.

Recently, work from the Kürti group established the first examples of non-deprotonative primary amination of arylmetals with NH-oxaziridines (Figure 2, A and B).10 These transformations utilize electrophilic amination as a practical process for N-transfer and the direct, transition-metal free synthesis of primary anilines. While these methods are widely applicable and tolerate a range of functional groups, the scope was limited to arylmetal substrates and was initially unsuccessful with more basic alkylmetal substrates under the optimized reaction conditions. In order to expand upon previous findings and increase the diversity of using NH-oxaziridines for primary electrophilic amination, this work focuses on further exploration of the direct amination of alkylmetals (Figure 2: C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Exploring the reactivity of primary amination with NH-oxaziridines.

Additionally, the goal of this study was not only to expand the substrate scope for the synthesis of aliphatic amines on primary carbon atoms, but also to directly access primary amines on more hindered secondary and tertiary carbon centers.

To synthesize these primary amines, we began by altering the reaction conditions from those reported for NH-transfer to arylmetals in order to find an ideal balance between nucleophilicity and basicity (Table 1).10b These preliminary experiments, which modified the reaction temperature and time, produced primary aliphatic amine 2 in good yield and demonstrated a viable pathway for N-transfer from NH-oxaziridines to alkylmetals (Table 1, entry 1). Additionally, through initial experiments, it was discovered that purification by silica gel or basic alumina chromatography strongly binds the product and was unnecessary for isolation of the desired amine. Instead, a simple acid/base workup procedure that initially quenches the reaction with 2 M aqueous HCl and subsequently basifies with 2 M NaOH resulted in good isolated yield of the free amine.

Table 1.

Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Primary Amination of Alkylmetals with NH-Oxaziridine.

graphic file with name nihms-1614178-t0008.jpg
entry[a] oxaziridine solvent catalyst (10 mol %) temp (°C) time (h) yield
1 3 THF none rt 1 64%
2 3 THF none rt 2 78%
3 3 THF none rt 4 82%
4 4 THF none rt 4 <50%b
5 5 THF none rt 4 <30%b
6 6 THF none rt 4 44%
7 3 THF Co(acac)2 rt 6 none
8 3 THF Fe(acac)3 rt 6 trace
9 3 THF Cu(acac)2 rt 6 <40%b
10 3 Et2O none rt 6 83%
11 3 Et2O none 0 6 trace
12 3 Et2O none −78 6 trace
[a]

Reactions were conducted on a 1.0 mmol scale. Grignard (1.0 equiv) was added dropwise to a solution of NH-oxaziridine (1.2 equiv) in solvent (5.0 mL) at indicated temperature and stirred for 1–6 hours. Acid/base workup was conducted for isolation of the free amine.

[b]

Workup conditions did not yield pure products (i.e. 50–60% purity only).

Further optimization of the reaction conditions for NH-transfer is shown in Table 1. First, the impact of the reaction time was studied and the yield of amine 2 increased as the time was extended from 1 to 4 hours (Table 1, entries 1–3). Next, all readily available bench-stable NH-oxaziridines (4–6) which are known to act as exclusive N-transfer agents were evaluated and compared to the results obtained with oxaziridine 3 (Table 1, entry 3 vs. 4–6). Although the desired primary amine 2 was obtained with oxaziridines 4 and 5, we experienced an increased difficulty in isolating it without impurities from the camphor and fenchone by-products. The addition of Co(II), Fe(II), or Cu(II) catalysts examined whether a partially transmetalated system would increase the yield of aminated product and were chosen based on findings from Knochel et al. in the Co(II)-catalyzed electrophilic amination of arylzinc pivalates (Table 1, entries 7–9).11 While Co(II) inhibited the transformation, primary amine 2 was formed with the Fe(III) and Cu(II) catalysts, albeit in yields lower than in the absence of transition metals. Next, the use of Et2O instead of THF as solvent was investigated (Table 1, entry 3 vs. 10). Although the yields were comparable (82% vs. 83%), we found that running the reaction in the more nonpolar solvent, Et2O, produced amine 2 with slightly higher purity. Finally, temperature screens showed that low temperatures (0 °C and −78 °C) hindered the amination pathway and only trace amounts of the product were observed (Table 1, entries 9–11). Overall, the optimization studies revealed that the NH-transfer reaction proceeds with maximum efficiency at ambient temperature and does not require transition metal catalysis or purification by column chromatography.

With the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of NH-transfer from oxaziridine 3 to the primary carbon atoms of organometallic reagents was explored (Scheme 1). The transformation produced good to excellent yields for the corresponding primary aliphatic amines. While most substrates were isolated as free amines, several examples were obtained as the corresponding HCl salts (16, 18, 21) to ease the isolation process. Benzylic amines were produced in high yields (up to 93%) with electron-donating substituents at the ortho-, meta-, and para- positions (Scheme 1: 9–12). The Grignard reagents for substrates 9–11 were prepared in diethyl ether instead of THF; it was experimentally determined that adding the Grignard reagent at −78 °C and allowing the reaction to subsequently warm to room temperature drastically increased the yield and purity of the isolated amine for these substrates.

Scheme 1. Formation of Primary Amines from Primary Organometallic Reagents.

Scheme 1.

[a] Reaction conditions: oxaziridine (1.2 mmol) and Et2O (5.0 mL) were combined in a dry flask under Ar before the dropwise addition of alkyl organometal (1.0 mmol) at rt. [b] Grignard addition conducted at −78 °C before the reaction warmed to rt.

Increasing the length of the chain to two carbons atoms from the phenyl ring continued to produce the primary amines in good yield (Scheme 1: 2, 13–16). Substitutions at the ortho- and meta- positions were well tolerated for these substrates along with both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing functional groups (Scheme 1: 14 vs. 15). Adding substituents to the carbon atom adjacent to the site of NH-transfer furnished the corresponding amine in moderate yield (Scheme 1: 16). Further extension of the carbon chain to three atoms gave the corresponding primary amines in good yield (Scheme 1: 17 and 18). Interestingly, inserting an ether linkage between the phenyl ring and aliphatic chain had little effect on the transformation and the product was isolated in 67% yield (Scheme 1: 19).

As a general trend, increasing the length of the chain from two to four carbon atoms led to a slight decrease in yield (83% vs. 73% vs. 71%) of the corresponding amine, but overall the amination efficiency was unaffected (Scheme 1: 2 vs. 17 vs. 20).

Amination of a completely aliphatic Grignard reagent was also successful (Scheme 1: 21). Interestingly, it was discovered that the amination pathway proceeds with good yield for organozinc substrates in addition to Grignard reagents (Scheme 1: 22). The presence of an electrophilic nitrile functionality was well tolerated under these conditions.

The substrate scope was further expanded to include NH-transfer to alkylmetal substrates on more difficult to access secondary and tertiary carbon atoms (Scheme 2). Amination of the benzylic position of a secondary Grignard reagent produced the corresponding amine in good yield (Scheme 2: 25). Additionally, the primary amination method was also successful for secondary alkyl organozinc and Grignard reagents derived from norborane and adamantane, respectively (Scheme 2: 26 and 27). Compound 26 was isolated as the exo-isomer, which indicates retention of configuration from the commercially available exo-2-norbornylzinc bromide (see SI compound 26’). Finally, primary amination of sterically hindered tertiary organometals proceeded in moderate isolated yield up to 55% for both Grignard and organozinc substrates (Scheme 2: 28 and 29).

Scheme 2. Formation of Primary Amines from Secondary and Tertiary Organometallic Reagents.

Scheme 2.

[a] Reaction conditions: oxaziridine (1.2 mmol) and Et2O (5.0 mL) were combined in a dry flask under Ar before the dropwise addition of alkyl organometal (1.0 mmol) at rt. [b] Grignard addition conducted at −78 °C before the reaction warmed to rt.

Similar to the reactions of aryl Grignard reagents with the fenchone-derived NH-oxaziridine, 10b the addition reactions reported in Schemes 1 and 2 with alkyl organomagnesium and organozinc reagents show significant selectivity for N-attack amination versus protonolysis or O-attack hydroxylation. Therefore, we used density functional theory (DFT) calculations to examine the transition states to determine if this is a result of kinetic selectivity. Calculations were carried out in Gaussian 0912 using M06 and M06-L for energies, geometries and thermochemical analysis.13

We used a dinuclear phenethyl model [(PhCH2CH2)MgBr]2 and a mononuclear secondary adamantyl (C10H16)ZnBr model14 in a continuum SMD15 model for diethylether solvent. Gibbs energies and enthalpies reported are relative to these models and oxaziridine 3. Scheme 3 confirms that the origin of amination preference in these reactions is kinetic, despite the high basicity of alkyl Grignard reagents. With M06–2X/def2-TZVP, the phenethyl N-attack transition state (TS1) is lower in energy than proton transfer (TS2), although on the enthalpy surface this is only a 1.1 kcal/mol difference. The O-attack transition state (TS3) is 7.9 kcal/mol higher in energy. We also calculated this kinetic selectivity with ωB97X-D/def2-TZVP, which a larger 3.6 kcal/mol ΔΔH value between TS1 and TS2.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

M06–2X/def2-TZVP//M06–2X/6–31G**[LANL2DZ for Br] DFT calculated transition-state structures for Phenethyl Grignard N-attack, proton transfer, and O-attack of oxaziridine 3. (kcal/mol)

Similar to the organomagnesium reagents, Scheme 4 depicts the three transition states that showcase kinetic N-attack selectivity. TS4 shows Zn coordination to the N atom of 3 that provides transfer of the adamantyl group from Zn to nitrogen with simultaneous N-O bond cleavage. The ΔH for this process is 12.2 kcal/mol, relative to separated reactants, and leads to the ketone and (C10H16)NHZnBr intermediate. Proton transfer and O-attack are significantly higher in energy. Proton transfer by TS5 has ΔH = 28.6 kcal/mol and O-attack by TS6 has ΔH = 24.7 kcal/mol. We also sampled the ωB97X-D, M06-L, and M06 functionals. All of these functionals suggested that the kinetic selectivity for N-attack versus proton transfer is larger than 4 kcal/mol.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

M06–2X/def2-TZVP//M06-L/6–31G**[LANL2DZ for Zn and Br] DFT calculated transition-state structures for Zn-Adamantyl N-attack, proton transfer, and O-attack of oxaziridine 3. (kcal/mol)

In conclusion, we have developed an operationally simple and mild protocol for the primary electrophilic amination of alkylmetals, a transformation that has been missing from the toolbox of synthetic chemists. This approach utilizes a bench-stable NH-oxaziridine as the nitrogen source and is capable of the efficient electrophilic amination of primary, secondary, and even tertiary alkylmagnesium- and alkylzinc halides. DFT calculations concluded that the N-transfer pathway is more favorable compared to the proton- and O-transfer pathways for both alkylmetal species.

Supplementary Material

SI_Alkylmetals

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank Dr. Zhe Zhou (Rice University) for helpful discussions.

Funding Sources

Rice University

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM-114609-04)

National Science Foundation (CAREER:SusChEM CHE- 1546097)

Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant C-1764), ACS-PRF (Grant 51707-DNI1)

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Experimental details, compound characterization, and NMR spectra. (PDF)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lawrence SA, Amines: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Davies BE, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65 Suppl 2, ii5–ii10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Govorkova EA; Fang HB; Tan M; Webster RG, Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2004, 48, 4855–4863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Herman GA; Stevens C; Van Dyck K; Bergman A; Yi B; De Smet M; Snyder K; Hilliard D; Tanen M; Tanaka W; Wang AQ; Zeng W; Musson D; Winchell G; Davies MJ; Ramael S; Gottesdiener KM; Wagner JA, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 78, 675–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Gibson MS; Bradshaw RW, Agnew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1968, 7, 919–930 [Google Scholar]; b) Corey EJ; Li JJ, Gabriel Synthesis. In Name Reactions for Functional Group Transformations John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 2007; pp 438–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kurti L; Czako B, Staudinger Reaction. In Strategic Applications of Named Reactions in Organic Synthesis, 1 ed.; Academic Press: 2005; pp 428–429. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Orlandi M; Brenna D; Harms R; Jost S; Benaglia M, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 22, 430–445. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Bornschein C; Werkmeister S; Wendt B; Jiao H; Alberico E; Baumann W; Junge H; Junge K; Beller M, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Laval S; Dayoub W; Favre-Reguillon A; Berthod M; Demonchaux P; Mignani G; Lemaire M, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 7005–7007; [Google Scholar]; c) Haddenham D; Pasumansky L; DeSoto J; Eagon S; Singaram B, J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1964–1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Ricci A, Amino Group Chemistry: From Synthesis to the Life Sciences. 1 ed.; Wiley-VCH: 2008; pp 1–54 [Google Scholar]; b) Ciganek E, Org. React. 2009, 72; [Google Scholar]; Erdik E; Daskapan T, Synth. Commun. 1999, 3989. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kitamura M; Suga T; Shunsuke C; Narasaka K, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4619–4621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ghoraf M; Vidal J, Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7383–7385. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Z; Ma Z; Behnke NE; Gao H; Kurti L, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 115–118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Gao H; Zhou Z; Kwon DH; Coombs J; Jones S; Behnke NE; Ess DH; Kurti L, Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 681–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen YH; Grassl S; Knochel P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 1108–1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gaussian 09. Revision B.01, Frisch MJ; Trucks GW; Schlegel HB; Scuseria GE; Robb MA; Cheeseman JR; Scalmani G; Barone V; Mennucci B; Petersson GA; Nakatsuji H; Caricato M; Li X; Hratchian HP; Izmaylov AF; Bloino J; Zheng G; Sonnenberg JL; Hada M; Ehara M; Toyota K; Fukuda R; Hasegawa J; Ishida M; Nakajima Y; Honda Y; Kitao O; Nakai H; T. V; Montgomery JA; Peralta JE; Ogliaro F; Bearpark M; Heyd JJ; Brothers E; Kudin KN; Staroverov VN; Kobayashi R; Normand J; Raghacachari K; Rendell A; Burant JC; Iyengar SS; Tomasi J; Cossi M; Rega N; Millam JM; Klene M; Knox JE; Cross JB; Bakken V; Adamo C; Jaramillo J; Gomperts R; Stratmann RE; Yazyev O; Austin AJ; Cammi R; Pomelli C; Ochterski JW; Martin RL; Morokuma K; Zakrzewski VG; Voth GA; Salvador P; Dannenberg JJ; Dapprich A; Daniels D; Farkas O; Foresman JB; Ortiz JV; Cioslowski J; Fox DJ, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.a) Zhao Y; Truhlar DG, J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 194101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhao Y; Truhlar DG, Theor. Chem. Acc. 2007, 120, 215–241 [Google Scholar]; c) Zhao Y; Truhlar DG, Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 157–167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Weigend F; Ahlrichs R, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 3297–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Feller DJ, J. Comp. Chem. 1996, 17, 1571–1586 [Google Scholar]; f) Schuchardt KL; Didier BT; Elsethagen T; Sun L; Gurumoorthi V; Chase J; Li J; Windus TL, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1045–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a) Abraham MH; Rolfe PH, J. Organomet. Chem. 1967, 7, 35–43 [Google Scholar]; b) Boersma J; Noltes JG, J. Organomet. Chem. 1967, 8, 551–553 [Google Scholar]; c) Rappoport Z; Marek I, The Chemistry of Organozinc Compounds. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marenich AV; Cramer CJ; Truhlar DG, J. Phys. Chem. 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI_Alkylmetals

RESOURCES