Abstract
Alcohol use disorders are associated with altered stress responses, but the impact of stress or stress hormones on alcohol-associated tissue injury remain unknown. We evaluated the effects of chronic restraint stress on alcohol-induced gut barrier dysfunction and liver damage in mice. To determine whether corticosterone is the stress hormone associated with the stress-induced effects, we evaluated the effect of chronic corticosterone treatment on alcoholic tissue injury at the Gut-Liver-Brain (GLB) axis. Chronic restraint stress synergized alcohol-induced epithelial tight junction disruption and mucosal barrier dysfunction in the mouse intestine. These effects of stress on the gut were reproduced by corticosterone treatment. Corticosterone synergized alcohol-induced expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the colonic mucosa, and it potentiated the alcohol-induced endotoxemia and systemic inflammation. Corticosterone also potentiated alcohol-induced liver damage and neuroinflammation. Metagenomic analyses of 16S RNA from fecal samples indicated that corticosterone modulates alcohol-induced changes in the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota. In Caco-2 cell monolayers, corticosterone dose-dependently potentiated ethanol and acetaldehyde-induced tight junction disruption and barrier dysfunction. These data indicate that chronic stress and corticosterone exacerbate alcohol-induced mucosal barrier dysfunction, endotoxemia, and systemic alcohol responses. Corticosterone-mediated promotion of alcohol-induced intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction and modulation of gut microbiota may play a crucial role in the mechanism of stress-induced promotion of alcohol-associated tissue injury at the GLB axis.
Subject terms: Colon, Gastrointestinal models
Introduction
Alcohol-related diseases (ARD) are the primary health issues across populations worldwide. A common denominator in the pathogenesis of ARD is systemic inflammation1, 2. Alcohol induces inflammatory responses in multiple organs, including the gut, liver, pancreas, and brain1. Gut barrier dysfunction and resulting endotoxemia are crucial steps involved in systemic inflammation in alcohol use disorders (AUD)3. Intestinal dysbiosis, associated with increased production of bacterial toxins, is another essential cofactor in alcohol-associated endotoxemia. The intestinal microbial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is absorbed into the portal circulation and targets the Kupffer cells and hepatocytes in the liver. The LPS-activated liver cells release a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines4–6. Once released into the systemic circulation, LPS targets multiple organs by inducing a systemic inflammatory response. For instance, alcohol induces neuroinflammation potentially by LPS and toll-like receptor 4-dependent mechanism7–10.
The primary component of the intestinal mucosal barrier function is the epithelial tight junction (TJ), which prevents diffusion of LPS from the gut lumen into the mucosa and subsequent absorption into the systemic circulation. The TJ is a multiprotein complex consisting of various proteins, including occludin, claudins, zonula occludens (ZO-1), and cingulin11–13. The TJ protein complex is fastened to the actomyosin belt at the apical end of the epithelial cells. Ethanol and its metabolite, acetaldehyde, synergistically disrupt the intestinal epithelial TJ by involving multiple intracellular signaling mechanisms14–16. TJ disruption is a crucial step involved in alcohol-induced endotoxemia. The adherens junction (AJ) consists of E-cadherin, β-catenin, and other proteins17. It is located beneath the TJ and indirectly regulates the integrity of TJ18.
Only about 20% of alcoholics develop liver disease19. Therefore, the multiple-hit-model is proposed to describe the pathogenesis of alcohol-associated liver disease20. Chronic stress plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of many gastrointestinal and systemic diseases21–24. AUD is highly comorbid with chronic stress disorders25–27. The stress-alcohol interaction studies, so far, have been focused on alcohol use and dependence. Evidence indicates that stress is a trigger for relapse of alcohol use and motivation to drink28. However, specific interactions between the alcohol and stress circuitries are unclear25. A crucial pathway altered during alcohol use and dependence is the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA) axis29. Acute alcohol intake causes a stress-like response that includes a transient increase in plasma cortisol30. In contrast, chronic alcohol use leads to dysregulation of the HPA axis and a sustained elevation of plasma cortisol30. Cortisol causes multiple cellular effects in different tissues by binding to a ubiquitously distributed intracellular glucocorticoid receptor (GR)31. Many studies have addressed the role of stress, glucocorticoids, and glucocorticoid receptors in alcohol use and dependence. However, there is no information available regarding the impact of stress or glucocorticoids on alcohol-induced tissue injury. We hypothesize that chronic stress is a potential a secondary hit in the pathogenesis of alcohol-related diseases, exacerbating alcohol-induced tissue damage. In the current study, we investigated the cross-talk between chronic stress (or corticosterone) and alcohol, leading to synergistic intestinal epithelial permeability, dysbiosis, and systemic responses.
Results
Restraint stress exacerbates alcohol-induced mucosal barrier dysfunction in the mouse intestine
As described above, chronic stress is likely a second-hit in the pathogenesis of alcohol-associated tissue injury. Mice were subjected to chronic ethanol feeding or chronic restraint stress (CRS) alone and ethanol feeding combined with CRS (EtOH + CRS). The diet intake in different groups was matched by pair-feeding. CRS initially caused a significant loss of body weight in pair-fed and ethanol-fed mice, which recovered subsequently (Fig. 1A). Body weights in the EtOH + CRS group, however, remained significantly lower than in the other groups through the course of the experiment. Plasma corticosterone levels were significantly increased by ethanol feeding, and the levels several-fold higher when ethanol feeding was combined with CRS (Fig. 1B). The corticosterone levels were measured at the end of the experiment, and therefore it represents the steady-state concentrations. The plasma corticosterone concentration is likely much higher during restraint stress. Confocal microscopic images show that ethanol and CRS by themselves caused a redistribution of occludin and ZO-1 from the intercellular junctions of the colonic epithelium (Fig. 1C); these effects were more severe in the EtOH + CRS group. Redistribution of TJ proteins by ethanol and CRS was associated with a significant increase in mucosal inulin permeability in the colon (Fig. 1D). The increase in colonic mucosal permeability in the EtOH + CRS group was higher than the sum of ethanol and CRS effects alone. In the ileum, ethanol and CRS alone showed no significant alteration of mucosal permeability (Fig. 1E). However, EtOH + CRS increased inulin permeability by nearly four folds. These data indicate that CRS promotes alcohol-induced gut barrier dysfunction.
CRS enhances alcohol-induced liver damage
Chronic alcohol use causes fatty liver and hepatitis32. We examined the potential influence of chronic stress on alcohol-induced liver injury. Ethanol feeding significantly elevated plasma alanine transaminase (ALT; Fig. 1F) and aspartate transaminase (AST; Fig. 1G). CRS alone caused no effect on plasma levels of ALT or AST, but it significantly enhanced the ethanol-induced increase in these liver enzymes. Images from Oil Red O staining of liver sections showed that ethanol increased lipid deposits in the liver (Fig. 1H), associated with a significant increase in liver triglyceride content (Fig. 1I). CRS caused no significant effect on liver triglycerides, but it potentiated the effects of ethanol on lipid deposition and triglyceride content. Data indicate that CRS synergizes the damaging effects of alcohol on the liver.
Corticosterone promotes alcohol-induced TJ disruption and mucosal barrier dysfunction in mouse colon in vivo
The CRS effect could be mediated by several factors, such as corticosterone and epinephrine. As corticosterone was previously shown to cause intestinal barrier dysfunction, we wanted to determine whether the stress-induced effect was mediated by corticosterone. Hence, the second study was performed to determine whether chronic corticosterone treatment influenced ethanol-induced tissue injury. Bodyweight gains were significantly higher in mice that received ethanol and corticosterone (Fig. 2A), even though the diet intake was maintained similarly in all groups by pair-feeding. Chronic ethanol feeding and corticosterone treatment both elevated plasma corticosterone more than two-fold (Fig. 2B). Plasma corticosterone was measured 24 h after the last injection of corticosterone. Therefore, it is the steady-state concentration of corticosterone. This dose of corticosterone was previously reported to show stress responses33. This steady-state concentration of corticosterone is similar to the corticosterone concentration recorded after CRS (Fig. 1B). The combination of ethanol and corticosterone (EtOH + CORT) caused a four-fold increase in plasma corticosterone. Ethanol, corticosterone, or EtOH + CORT caused no visible morphologic changes in the colonic mucosa (Fig. ). Corticosterone alone did not affect colonic mucosal permeability to inulin, but it significantly potentiated ethanol-induced mucosal permeability (Fig. 2C). The confocal microscopic images showed that corticosterone enhanced the ethanol-induced redistribution of TJ (Fig. 2D) and AJ (Fig. 2E) proteins from the colonic epithelial junctions. These results indicate that corticosterone potentiates alcohol-induced disruption of colonic epithelial barrier function.
Corticosterone potentiates ethanol-induced inflammatory response in the colonic mucosa
Disruption of intestinal epithelial TJ opens the gateway for the influx of bacterial toxins (LPS) from the intestinal lumen into the mucosa, where it stimulates epithelial and immune cells and triggers an inflammatory response. We measured mRNA for different cytokines and the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) as the indicator for inflammatory responses in the colon. Ethanol increased mRNA for tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα; Fig. 3F), interleukin-1β (IL-1β; Fig. 2G), and MCP1 (Fig. 2H). Corticosterone by itself caused a significant reduction of IL-1β, TNFα, and MCP1 mRNA levels; however, it potentiated ethanol-induced elevation of mRNA for these cytokines and chemokine. Ethanol feeding significantly reduced interleukin-10 (IL-10) mRNA levels (Fig. 2I). Corticosterone did not alter IL-10 mRNA, but it potentiated the effect of ethanol. Ethanol or corticosterone alone or together had no significant effect on IL-6 mRNA in the colon (Fig. 2J). These data indicate that corticosterone synergizes alcohol-induced inflammatory responses in the mouse colon.
Exacerbation of alcohol-induced systemic inflammation by corticosterone
A consequence of gut barrier disruption is the absorption of LPS into the portal circulation and subsequent delivery into the systemic circulation, a condition referred to as endotoxemia. The current study shows that ethanol and corticosterone caused a significant elevation of plasma LPS (Fig. 3A). However, EtOH + CORT-induced elevation of plasma LPS levels was synergistically higher than by ethanol or corticosterone alone. Endotoxemia is known to induce inflammatory responses in various organs. Therefore, we measured levels of representative cytokines in plasma as a gauge of systemic inflammation. Ethanol significantly elevated plasma TNFα (Fig. 3B), IL-1β (Fig. 3C), IL-6 (Fig. 3D), and MCP1 (Fig. 3E). Corticosterone by itself caused a significant reduction of plasma TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6; however, it potentiated the ethanol-induced elevation of plasma cytokines. Corticosterone elevated plasma MCP1, but the levels were significantly higher by EtOH + CORT than in EtOH or corticosterone alone. These data indicate that corticosterone enhances alcohol-induced endotoxemia and systemic inflammation.
Corticosterone reinforces alcohol-induced liver damage
Evidence suggests that gut barrier dysfunction and endotoxemia are causal factors in the mechanism of alcohol-associated liver damage. The liver is the first target of portal LPS. LPS exposure has been shown to increase the expression of TLR4 and downstream signaling elements in a variety of tissues34,35. We measured the levels of mRNA for TLR4 and MYD88 in the liver as a marker of LPS exposure. Ethanol feeding significantly elevated both TLR4 (Fig. 4A) and myeloid differentiation primary response-88 (MYD88; Fig. 4B) mRNA in the liver. Corticosterone alone did not affect TLR4 or MYD88 mRNA; however, it enhanced the ethanol-induced elevation of TLR4 and MYD88 mRNA by several folds. Ethanol, but not corticosterone, elevated plasma ALT (Fig. 4C) and AST (Fig. 4D). Corticosterone enhanced the ethanol effect on AST by several folds. Histopathologic analysis indicated that corticosterone increased the severity of ethanol-induced liver injury (Fig. 4E). Corticosterone also enhanced the ethanol-induced elevation of liver triglycerides (Fig. 4F). Data indicate that corticosterone promotes alcohol-associated liver damage.
We assessed the inflammatory responses in the liver by measuring TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP1 mRNA levels. Ethanol feeding significantly increased liver mRNA for TNFα (Fig. 4G), IL-1β (Fig. 4H), interleukin-6 (IL-6; Fig. 4I), and MCP1 (Fig. 4J). Corticosterone by itself caused a significant reduction of TNFα and IL-1β mRNA in the liver. However, corticosterone elevated ethanol-induced increase in liver mRNA for IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP1 by 4–12 fold. Ethanol, corticosterone, and EtOH + CORT caused a similar reduction of IL-10 mRNA in the liver (Fig. 4K). These results indicate that alcohol-induced inflammatory reactions in the liver are enhanced by corticosterone.
Corticosterone potentiates alcohol-induced neuroinflammation
Neuroinflammation and dysregulated HPA axis are implicated in various ARD phenotypes. However, no information is available regarding the impact of the altered HPA axis in alcohol-associated tissue injury. Glucocorticoids have been established as a suppressor of neuroinflammation36,37. However, chronic glucocorticoid treatment is suggested to promote neuroinflammation38,39. We examined the effect of alcohol and corticosterone on cytokine and chemokine expression in the hypothalamus. The data showed that ethanol significantly elevates mRNA for TNFα (Fig. 5A), IL-1β (Fig. 5B), IL-6 (Fig. 5C), MCP1 (Fig. 5D), and chemokine ligand-5 (CCL5; Fig. 5E) in the hypothalamus. Ethanol feeding elevated mRNA for these cytokines and chemokines by 4–50 fold, and corticosterone alone raised mRNA for these cytokines and chemokines by 2–24 fold. Corticosterone induced a robust potentiation of ethanol-induced increase in mRNA for these cytokines and chemokines by 130–4000 fold over basal levels. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor, tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), show anti-inflammatory influences in the brain40,41. Our data show that ethanol feeding significantly reduced BDNF (Fig. 5F) and TrkB (Fig. 5G) mRNA levels in the hypothalamus. Corticosterone did not influence ethanol's effects on TrkB mRNA, but it significantly potentiated ethanol's effect on BDNF mRNA. The mRNA for GR was reduced by ethanol feeding (Fig. 5H), but corticosterone did not affect either in the presence or absence of ethanol. On the other hand, corticosterone and ethanol demonstrated a robust synergy in elevating mRNA for the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1 (CRHR1) gene (Fig. 5I). These data indicate a robust synergy between ethanol and corticosterone in inducing inflammatory responses in the hypothalamus. Ethanol and corticosterone significantly reduced IL-10 mRNA, but corticosterone did not influence ethanol-induced down-regulation of IL-10 expression (Fig. 5J).
Corticosterone sensitizes Caco-2 cell monolayers for ethanol and acetaldehyde-induced TJ disruption and barrier dysfunction
The primary mechanism involved in endotoxemia is the disruption of intestinal epithelial tight junction, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and LPS absorption. In the in vivo studies, it is unclear whether corticosterone directly affects the intestinal epithelium to increase gut permeability or if it was an indirect effect via corticosterone effect on other tissues. To determine the direct impact of corticosterone on the epithelium, we examined the effect of corticosterone (24-h pretreatment) on the ethanol and acetaldehyde (EtOH + AA)-induced TJ disruption and barrier dysfunction in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Our previous study demonstrated that ethanol and acetaldehyde synergistically disrupt TJ in Caco-2 cell monolayers16. In the current study, we used sub-responsive ethanol and acetaldehyde concentrations to evaluate the synergistic effects of corticosterone. Under these conditions, corticosterone or EtOH + AA produced no significant effect on the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) (Fig. 6A) or inulin permeability in sham-treated cell monolayers (Fig. 6B). However, EtOH + AA decreased TER and increased inulin permeability in cell monolayers pre-treated with corticosterone. The confocal microscopic images show that the junctional distribution of TJ and AJ proteins in Caco-2 cell monolayers were unaffected by corticosterone or EtOH + AA. Nevertheless, the corticosterone and EtOH + AA combination induced a robust redistribution of occludin and ZO-1 (Fig. 6C) as well as E-cadherin and β-catenin (Fig. 6D) from the intercellular junctions. The magnitude of these synergistic effects of corticosterone on EtOH + AA-induced junctional disruption and barrier dysfunction was dose-dependent.
Corticosterone modulates alcohol-induced intestinal dysbiosis
The second primary mechanism involved in endotoxemia is the dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota, leading to an increase in the relative abundance of pathobionts and LPS production. Previous studies by metagenomic analyses demonstrated that alcohol consumption leads to significant alteration of the gut microbiota composition42,43. We performed 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing and taxonomic analyses of fecal microbiota to determine whether corticosterone modified ethanol-induced dysbiosis. Alcohol feeding altered the taxonomic composition of fecal microbiota (Fig. 7A). Evaluation of α-diversity by analyzing the Shannon indices at the genus level indicated that ethanol caused a robust decrease in the Shannon index, whereas corticosterone significantly blocked the ethanol-induced reduction in the Shannon index (Fig. 7B). Beta-diversity analysis by Bray–Curtis indicated significant microbial composition differences between different groups (Fig. 7C). Spearman's correlation analysis, displayed as a heat map, confirmed substantial differences among the groups at the genus level (Fig. 7D). Spearman's correlation and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) indicated that ethanol feeding selectively altered numerous genera of bacteria (Fig. 7E); these alterations of gut microbiota were much severe when ethanol feeding was combined with corticosterone treatment (Fig. 7F). The effects of ethanol and corticosterone on the abundance of selected phyla are presented in the Supplemental Information (Fig. S2). Interestingly, corticosterone caused a robust increase in the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Brevundimonas in ethanol-fed mice (Fig. 7G).
We performed network analysis by Spearman’s correlation, which displays taxa likely to co-occur, color-coded by respective experimental groups (Fig. 7H) where node size indicates relative importance, and the lines indicate positive co-associations. Consistent with our other computational approaches, the network data illustrate distinct community membership changes following ethanol feeding. The network data demonstrated that the ethanol-induced changes occurred in clusters, suggesting that community stability or function may be globally altered after ethanol feeding; corticosterone further modulated ethanol-induced changes.
To model the potential changes in microbiota community function, we applied Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unbiased States (PICRUSt) to predict functional differences associated with taxonomic composition in each experimental group. Data displayed as a Spearman’s correlation heatmap indicated significant functional differences between groups (Fig. 8A). Ethanol feeding decreased metabolic pathways involved in amino acid, carbohydrate, and energy metabolism, including oxidative phosphorylation, whereas it increased pathways related to ABC transporters and transcription factors. The combination of corticosterone with alcohol elevated the pathways involved in bacterial secretory systems, protein folding, and ion-coupled transporters. Combination of ethanol and corticosterone induced a robust down-regulation of butyrate-producing bacteria, associated with a dramatic reduction of TCA cycle activity. Data also show that ethanol increased the expression of alcohol metabolic enzymes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase (Fig. 8B), aldehyde dehydrogenase (Fig. 8C), and acetyl-CoA synthetase (Fig. 8D). Corticosterone had no significant effect on ethanol-induced upregulation of the ethanol-metabolic pathway.
Our metagenomic pipeline included Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) sequencing for fungal microorganisms collected from stool samples. In general, Candida spp dominated the mycobiota in this group of animals (Fig. 9A). Despite the limited α-diversity found in the control group as assessed by the Chao1 (Fig. 9B) and Spearman correlation, ethanol feeding decreased fungal diversity further, driven largely by elevations in the relative abundance of Candida spp. Jaccard analysis indicated that β-diversity differed among the different groups (Fig. 9C). The abundance of Candida spp was similarly elevated by ethanol, corticosterone, and EtOH-CORT (Fig. 9D). Interestingly, the abundance of Cladosporium, a mold, was several-fold higher in the EtOH + CORT group than in the other groups.
Discussion
A significant body of evidence indicates that the pathogenesis of ARD involves persistent inflammation and tissue injury by the synergistic actions of alcohol use and a second hit or multiple hits. Gut barrier dysfunction, dysbiosis of gut microbiota, endotoxemia, and systemic inflammation, are key foundational events involved in the pathogenesis of ARD, such as liver disease, pancreatitis, lung injury, and brain damage. A second insult may target any of these events to exacerbate alcohol-induced tissue injury. In the current study, we present evidence of the potential role of chronic stress and the stress hormone corticosterone in aggravating alcohol-induced gut barrier dysfunction, dysbiosis, endotoxemia, and systemic inflammation. The study also provides evidence of an essential role of corticosterone in enhancing the alcohol-induced tissue injury at the Gut-Liver-Brain axis.
Increased gut mucosal permeability due to chronic stress44–47 and alcohol consumption14 has been well documented. Our current study demonstrates that the combination of chronic stress and alcohol consumption synergistically elevates intestinal mucosal permeability by severe disruption of the intestinal epithelial TJ and AJ. Corticosterone is a primary stress hormone that plays an essential role in stress responses. The chronic elevation of corticosterone is associated with severe health problems48,49. The current study indicates that corticosterone, similar to chronic restraint stress, exacerbates alcohol-induced disruption of epithelial junctions and mucosal permeability. This finding suggests that corticosterone is a primary causal factor in the stress-induced promotion of alcohol-associated gut permeability.
The disruption of epithelial barrier function and LPS flux into mucosa leads to mucosal inflammatory responses. The potentiating effects of corticosterone on the ethanol-induced elevation of mRNA for IL-1β, TNFα, and MCP1 suggest that corticosterone exacerbates alcohol-induced inflammatory responses in the intestinal mucosa. The mRNA for anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was reduced by ethanol feeding, which was further potentiated by corticosterone. Therefore, the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and downregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines contribute to ethanol and corticosterone-induced inflammatory responses in the intestinal mucosa. The synergizing effects on barrier dysfunction and LPS absorption are likely responsible for the corticosterone-mediated potentiation of ethanol-induced inflammatory responses. However, we cannot rule out the direct impact of corticosterone on immune and epithelial cells. Glucocorticoids are conventionally anti-inflammatory and known for their application as therapeutics to treat many inflammatory diseases50. Our current study shows that corticosterone by itself does reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. However, in the presence of alcohol, it increases the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.
The alcohol and corticosterone-induced gut barrier dysfunction and intestinal mucosal inflammation were associated with endotoxemia. The elevation of plasma LPS by the combination of alcohol and corticosterone was higher than the sum of the individual effects of alcohol and corticosterone. Alcohol and corticosterone-induced endotoxemia were accompanied by a synergistic elevation of plasma TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, and MCP1. These findings indicate that corticosterone potentiates alcohol-induced endotoxemia and systemic inflammation, although this hormone is known to be anti-inflammatory effects under certain conditions. Once again, these results indicate that corticosterone by itself suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, but it increases these cytokines in the presence of alcohol50.
Two significant mechanisms define the cause of endotoxemia under various pathophysiologic conditions. First, disruption of intestinal epithelial TJ and barrier dysfunction allows diffusion of bacterial toxins from the colonic lumen into the portal circulation. In our in vivo studies, it is unclear whether corticosterone directly targets the intestinal epithelium to promote alcohol-induced gut permeability or indirect mechanisms mediate the response. A recent study demonstrated that ethanol sensitizes Caco-2 cell monolayers to acetaldehyde-induced TJ disruption and barrier dysfunction16. We used this model to determine whether corticosterone directly impact the intestinal epithelium and modulates alcohol-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction. Ethanol and acetaldehyde-induced TJ disruption and permeability in cell monolayers pre-treated with corticosterone, but not in sham-treated cell monolayers, indicated that corticosterone directly sensitizes intestinal epithelium for alcohol-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction.
The second mechanism contributing to endotoxemia and systemic inflammation is intestinal dysbiosis. A significant body of evidence indicates that chronic alcohol use results in intestinal dysbiosis, which contributes to alcohol-induced inflammation and organ damage substantially. Analysis of microbial abundance at the phyla level indicated that alcohol caused intestinal dysbiosis, and corticosterone modulated alcohol-induced dysbiosis. Gut microbial diversity was dramatically reduced by ethanol feeding. Corticosterone treatment partially blocked this effect of ethanol, indicating that corticosterone preserves bacterial diversity in alcohol-fed mice. Although the pair-fed control, ethanol, and ethanol with corticosterone groups shared somewhat similar α-diversity, the distinct β-diversity among these groups indicated substantial variation in microbial populations. This observation was confirmed by taxonomic analysis using Spearman’s correlation, LEfSe scoring, and network visualization. The modulation of bacterial populations by corticosterone in ethanol-fed mice included many genera of bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae, Brevundimonas, Prevotella, and Lactobacillus. Significant functional differences are associated with the taxonomic composition of different groups of mice. Corticosterone upregulated the pathways related to protein folding, bacterial motility, and secretory system. We speculate that corticosterone increases the abundance of pathogenic bacteria, facilitates their invasive properties, and decreases the abundance of probiotics. Furthermore, a striking finding is that ethanol and corticosterone combined resulted in a robust reduction of butyrate-producing bacteria. This effect of ethanol and corticosterone is associated with a dramatic reduction of TCA cycle activity, the metabolic pathway necessary for butyrate production. Butyrate is known to have a mucosal protective role in the gut, and the butyrate prodrug, tributyrin, has been shown to prevent alcohol-induced tissue injury in mice51,52.
The liver is the first target of portal LPS. It is believed that gut barrier dysfunction leading to LPS absorption into the portal circulation is one of the primary factors involved in the pathogenesis of the alcohol-associated liver disease. The liver histopathology analyses, plasma AST activity, liver triglycerides, and cytokine/chemokine expression indicate that CRS and corticosterone aggravate ethanol-induced liver damage. This observation suggests that chronic stress and corticosterone promote the pathogenesis of alcohol-associated steatohepatitis. Although corticosterone by itself increased liver triglyceride, it reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the liver. However, the current data indicate that corticosterone is pro-inflammatory in the liver in the presence of alcohol. Although endotoxemia is a primary factor in systemic tissue injury, the other microbiome-based factors are likely involved in the mechanism of alcohol-associated tissue injury.
Neuroinflammation is one of the hallmark effects of chronic alcohol use53. The inflammatory responses in different brain regions are implicated in multiple phenotypes of AUD, such as addiction, anxiety, memory, and stress response54. The role of gut barrier dysfunction and resulting endotoxemia in alcohol-induced neuroinflammation is poorly understood. Our current study results indicate that chronic ethanol consumption and corticosterone treatment cause mild inflammation in the hypothalamus. However, a combination of ethanol and corticosterone caused a robust increase in the hypothalamic expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. In the normal stress response, corticosterone is released in response to stimulation of the hypothalamus. Corticosterone, in turn, suppresses hypothalamic corticosteroid release by negative feedback inhibition55. The current study indicates that alcohol consumption evokes a robust inflammatory response by the hypothalamus in the presence of corticosterone. The elevation of inflammatory cytokine expression in the hypothalamus by ethanol and corticosterone was associated with reduced GR, BDNF, and TrkB expression; however, corticosterone had no significant influence on these ethanol-induced effects. On the other hand, CRHR1 receptor expression in the hypothalamus was elevated by ethanol and corticosterone with a robust synergy.
GR expression is high in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus56,57. In a normal stress response, stress-induced increase in corticosterone production is terminated eventually by corticosterone-mediated feedback inhibition of PVN and CRH release58,59. A decrease in GR expression by chronic ethanol feeding indicates that the corticosterone-mediated feedback inhibition of the HPA axis is compromised, resulting in sustained elevation of plasma corticosterone. BDNF is expressed in the PVN of hypothalamus and plays an important role in the maintenance of various functions of HPA axis60,61, neuroprotection62, and synaptic plasticity63. Reduced expression of BDNF or TrkB decreased CRH expression and normal HPA functions64. Hence, ethanol-induced suppression of BDNF and TrkB in the hypothalamus may contribute to altered HPA axis and elevated plasma corticosterone. Further studies are needed to understand the interactions between the dysregulated HPA axis and alcohol-associated tissue injury.
The enhancing effects of corticosterone on alcohol effects raise the question of steroid-based therapy in alcohol-associated diseases. Prednisolone is a primary treatment for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis65; however, it offers only a short-term solution. Prednisolone is not useful for intermediate or long-term survival66. The primary mechanism of prednisolone therapy is its anti-inflammatory activity. Data from this study demonstrated that glucocorticoids elevated by alcohol use or administered exogenously caused gut barrier dysfunction, endotoxemia, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ damage. Therefore, it is not surprising that prednisolone is not an effective treatment strategy for the long-term survival of alcohol-associated hepatitis patients.
In summary, our current findings provide evidence of the role of chronic stress and the stress hormone corticosterone in potentiating alcohol-induced pathophysiology in the Gut-Liver-Brain axis. Corticosterone-induced sensitization of the intestinal epithelium for alcohol-induced TJ disruption and gut microbiota modulation are likely mechanisms underlying the stress-induced promotion of alcohol-associated tissue injury.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
Maltose dextrin was purchased from Bioserv (Flemington, NJ, USA). Regular Lieber-DeCarli EtOH diet was purchased from Dyets Inc (Cat# 710260; Bethlehem, PA, USA). Corticosterone, Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG antibodies, and anti-actin antibodies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Anti-ZO-1 antibody, anti-occludin antibody, Hoechst 33342 dye, and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated phalloidin were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Anti-E-cadherin and anti-β-catenin antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA).
Animals and diets
Female C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks old; Harlan Laboratories, Houston, TX, USA) were used for chronic restraint stress and corticosterone treatment studies. All animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the UTHSC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were housed in an institutional animal care facility with 12:12 h light–dark cycles. Animals in all groups had free access to standard laboratory chow and water until the experiments. During the experiments, mice were fed the Lieber-DeCarli liquid diet as described before67.
Stress and ethanol feeding
Animals were fed increasing doses of ethanol (EF) for 4 weeks (0% 2d, 1% 2 days, 2% 2 days, 4% 1 week, 5% 1 week, and 6% 1 week) in Lieber-DeCarli liquid diet as described before67,68. Control mice were pair-fed (PF) iso-caloric maltodextrin. In some groups, PF and EF mice were combined with one of the two types of stressors.
(1) Chronic stress Mice were subjected to chronic restraint stress (CRS) for 2 h daily during ethanol feeding. Non-stressed groups were maintained without food and water for 2 h daily (SHAM). For CRS, mice were physically restrained using the TV150 restrainer (Braintree Scientific, Braintree, MA) for 2 h daily (9–11 AM). Control mice were kept in cages with no food or water for 2 h. Five days after beginning CRS, animals are switched to liquid diet, but the CRS was continued until the day before euthanesia.
(2) Corticosterone treatment PF and EF mice were injected daily with corticosterone (25 mg/kg/day, s.c. for 4 weeks; CORT). Control groups were injected with the vehicle (VEH). Overall, 3 different studies were performed: (1) four wild-type mice—PF + SHAM, PF + CRS, EF + SHAM, and EF + CRS. (2) Four groups of wild-type mice—PF + VEH, PF + CORT, EF + VEH, and EF + CORT. In all experiments, animals were maintained in pairs to facilitate body temperature maintenance and prevent social isolation (an additional stressor).
Gut permeability in vivo
Colonic and ileal mucosal permeability was evaluated as described previously69. At the end of each experiment, mice were intravenously injected with FITC-inulin (100 mg/ml solution; 2 μl/g body weight) via tail vein, and the fluorescence in plasma and intestinal luminal flushing was measured after one hour. Immediately following euthanasia, the ileum and colon were excised and flushed with 3 ml 09% saline. Flushing was briefly homogenized to break the solid contents and centrifuged at 2000×g to collect the supernatant and measure fluorescence in a plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Fluorescence values in the luminal flushing were normalized to fluorescence values in corresponding plasma samples and calculated as the inulin load percentage.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously69. Cryosections (10 μm) were fixed in acetone: methanol (1:1), permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and blocked in 4% nonfat milk in Triton-Tris buffer. Tissue sections were incubated with primary antibodies (mouse monoclonal anti-occludin and rabbit polyclonal anti–ZO-1 antibodies or mouse monoclonal E-cadherin and rabbit polyclonal anti-β-catenin antibodies) for one hour. It was then incubated for another hour with the secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies). Hoechst 33342 dye was added during the last 10 min of incubation. The actin cytoskeleton was stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated phalloidin. The fluorescence was examined using a Zeiss 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany) and processed as previously described68,69. All images for tissue samples from different groups were collected and processed under identical conditions.
RT-PCR
Tissues (ileum, distal colon, liver, and brain regions) were dissected immediately after decapitation and stored at − 80 °C in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Individual tissues were homogenized in TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and RNA was isolated. For the hypothalamus, the brain was removed and placed ventral side up. The curved part of the forceps was pushed down around the hypothalamus was pushed down using curved forceps and gently spooned by pinching it out. Immediately, the tissue was placed in 2 ml tubes with 0.5 ml of RNAlater.
RT-qPCR was performed as described before69. Total RNA (1.5 μg) was used to generate cDNAs using the ThermoScript RT-PCR System for first-strand synthesis (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions were performed using cDNA mix (cDNA corresponding to 35 ng RNA) with 300 nM of primers in a final volume of 25 μl of 2 times concentrated RT2 Real-Time SYBR Green/Rox Master Mix (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) in an Applied Biosystems QuatStudio 6-Flex Real-Time PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cycle parameters were as follows: 50 °C for 2 min, one denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s followed by annealing and elongation at 60 °C. The relative gene expression of each transcript was normalized to GAPDH using the ΔΔCt method. Sequences of primers used for qPCR are provided in Table S1.
Microbiome analyses
Microbiome analyses of fecal samples were performed as described recently70.
DNA extraction and Illumina MiSeq sequencing
Stool samples were resuspended in 500 μL of TNES buffer containing 200 units of lyticase and 100 μL of 0.1/0.5 (50/50 Vol.) zirconia beads. Incubation was performed for 20 min at 37 °C. Following mechanical disruption using ultra-high-speed bead beating, 20 μg of proteinase K was added to all samples, and they were incubated overnight at 55 °C with agitation. Total DNA was extracted using chloroform-isoamyl-alcohol mixture (25:24:1), and total DNA concentration per mg stool was determined by qRT-PCR. Purified DNA samples were sent to the Argonne National Laboratory (Lemont, IL) for amplicon sequencing using the NextGen Illumina MiSeq platform. Blank samples passed through the entire collection, extraction, and amplification process remained free of DNA amplification.
Bioinformatics
Sequencing data were processed and analyzed using QIIME (Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology) 1.9.1 Sequences were first demultiplexed, then denoised, and clustered into sequence variants. For bacteria, we rarified to a depth of 10,000 sequences. Representative bacterial sequences were aligned via PyNAST, with taxonomy assigned using the RDP Classifier. Processed data were then imported into Calypso 8.84 for further analysis and data visualization71. The Shannon index was used to quantify α-diversity72,73. Bray–Curtis analysis was used to quantify β-diversity, and the differences were compared using PERMANOVA with 999 permutations. For fungi, sequences were aligned, and taxonomy was assigned using the UNITE metabarcoding (dynamic setting) database74. Fungal OTUs were rarified at a depth of 300 sequences for α-diversity using Chao1 and β-diversity based on Jaccard dissimilarities at the OTU level75. As with bacteria, beta diversity was then assessed using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). To quantify the relative abundance of taxa between groups76, we utilized ANOVA adjusted using the Bonferroni correction and FDR for multiple comparisons. We used linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe) to test for significance and perform high-dimensional biomarker identification77. Network analysis was generated from Spearman’s correlations. Positive correlations with a false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted, p < 0.05 were presented as an edge. PICRUSt was performed by picking closed OTU tables against GreenGenes, as previously described (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2676). Following pathway prediction, a heat map was generated for the 50 most abundant pathways using Spearman’s correlations. Predictive metagenomics was performed using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt), where abundances of metabolic pathways were then calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and presented in a heatmap or specific alcohol-related enzymes were displayed as ANOVA. (See Citation in comments).
Plasma endotoxin assay
Plasma endotoxin concentrations were measured using the Pierce LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantitation Kit (Cat# 88282; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Liver histopathology
Liver and colon tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, and 8 µm thick paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as described recently69. For steatosis analysis, frozen liver sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich), and rinsed with 60% isopropanol; nuclei were stained with hematoxylin. Stained sections were imaged by a Nikon 80Ti Microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using a 40× objective lens and a color camera.
Plasma transaminase assay
Plasma ALT and AST activities were measured by colorimetric assay using specific kits from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
Triglyceride assay
Liver lipids were extracted by digestion with 3 M potassium hydroxide (in 65% ethanol) at room temperature for 24 h. Liver triglycerides were quantified by the glycerol phosphate oxidase method using an assay kit from Beckman Coulter (Brea, CA, USA).
Cell culture
Caco-2bbe2 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown under standard cell culture conditions as previously described44. Experiments were conducted using cells grown in Transwell inserts (6.5 mm; Corning, Corning, NY, USA) for ten days.
Cell treatments
Cell monolayers were pre-treated with corticosterone (0, 0.5, 1.0, or 10.0 μM) for 24 h, followed by incubation with 100 μM acetaldehyde and 20 mM ethanol for 1–3 h.
Epithelial barrier function
Barrier function was evaluated by measuring transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and inulin permeability as described before69. TER was measured using a Millicell-ERS Electrical Resistance System (MilliporeSigma), and macromolecular permeability was evaluated by measuring the unidirectional flux of FITC-inulin. The basal TER values for Caco-2 cell monolayers were 400–500 Ω/cm2.
Statistical analyses
The differences among multiple groups were first analyzed by ANOVA via GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) as described before69. When statistical significance was detected, Tukey's t-test was used to determine the significance between multiple testing groups and the corresponding controls. Statistical significance was established at 95%.
Microbiota data access
Data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at: https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/SUB7619938/overview.
Supplementary Information
Abbreviations
- AA
Acetaldehyde
- AJ
Adherens junction
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- AUD
Alcohol use disorder
- BDNF
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
- CRHR1
Corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1
- CRS
Chronic restraint stress
- CORT
Corticosterone
- EtOH
Ethanol
- GLB
Gut–liver–brain axis
- GR
Glucocorticoid receptor
- HPA
Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- TJ
Tight junction
- TLR4
Toll-like receptor 4
- TNF
Tumor necrosis factor
- TrkB
Tropomyosin receptor kinase B
- ZO-1
Zonula occludens
Author contributions
P.K.S. and A.S.M. are major contributors to the execution of experiments, data processing, and preparation of figures. K.D. and C.C. have contributed by performing some of the assays for these studies. G.S. performed chronic stress experiments and organized the data from those experiments. J.F.P. analyzed the microbiota data, organized them into figures, and assisted in manuscript preparation. R.K.R. contributed by proposing the idea and hypothesis, designing experimental strategy, supervising the study's execution, data interpretation, and manuscript preparation.
Funding
This study was supported primarily by a Grant from the Veterans Administration I01-BX003014 and partly by NIH Grants R01-AA12307 and R01-DK55532.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Pradeep K. Shukla and Avtar S. Meena.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-80637-y.
References
- 1.Gonzalez-Reimers E, Santolaria-Fernandez F, Martin-Gonzalez MC, et al. Alcoholism: A systemic pro-inflammatory condition. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14660–14671. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patel S, Behara R, Swanson GR, et al. Alcohol and the Intestine. Biomolecules. 2015;5:2573–2588. doi: 10.3390/biom5042573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morris NL, Ippolito JA, Curtis BJ, et al. Alcohol and inflammatory responses: Summary of the 2013 Alcohol and Immunology Research Interest Group (AIRIG) meeting. Alcohol. 2015;49:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2014.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seabra V, Stachlewitz RF, Thurman RG. Taurine blunts LPS-induced increases in intracellular calcium and TNF-alpha production by Kupffer cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1998;64:615–621. doi: 10.1002/jlb.64.5.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thomas P, Lazure DA, Moussa R, et al. Identification of two novel LPS-binding proteins in Kupffer cells: Implications in TNF-alpha production. J. Endotoxin Res. 2006;12:352–357. doi: 10.1177/09680519060120060501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Weinhold L, Schulze-Specking A, Decker K. Signal transduction in endotoxin-stimulated synthesis of TNF-alpha and prostaglandin E2 by rat Kupffer cells: Role of extracellular calcium ions and protein kinase C. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler. 1991;372:829–834. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1991.372.2.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lippai D, Bala S, Petrasek J, et al. Alcohol-induced IL-1beta in the brain is mediated by NLRP3/ASC inflammasome activation that amplifies neuroinflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013;94:171–182. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1212659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pascual M, Montesinos J, Montagud-Romero S, et al. TLR4 response mediates ethanol-induced neurodevelopment alterations in a model of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J. Neuroinflam. 2017;14:145. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0918-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qin L, He J, Hanes RN, et al. Increased systemic and brain cytokine production and neuroinflammation by endotoxin following ethanol treatment. J. Neuroinflam. 2008;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-5-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shukla PK, Meena AS, Rao R, et al. Deletion of TLR-4 attenuates fetal alcohol exposure-induced gene expression and social interaction deficits. Alcohol. 2018;73:73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anderson JM, Van Itallie CM. Physiology and function of the tight junction. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009;1:a002584. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Van Itallie CM, Anderson JM. Architecture of tight junctions and principles of molecular composition. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;36:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rao R. Occludin phosphorylation in regulation of epithelial tight junctions. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2009;1165:62–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rao R. Endotoxemia and gut barrier dysfunction in alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;50:638–644. doi: 10.1002/hep.23009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Samak G, Chaudhry KK, Gangwar R, et al. Calcium/Ask1/MKK7/JNK2/c-Src signalling cascade mediates disruption of intestinal epithelial tight junctions by dextran sulfate sodium. Biochem. J. 2015;465:503–515. doi: 10.1042/BJ20140450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Samak G, Gangwar R, Meena AS, et al. Calcium channels and oxidative stress mediate a synergistic disruption of tight junctions by ethanol and acetaldehyde in CaCo2 cell monolayers. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:38899. doi: 10.1038/srep38899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Coopman P, Djiane A. Adherens junction and E-Cadherin complex regulation by epithelial polarity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016;73:3535–3553. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2260-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campbell HK, Maiers JL, DeMali KA. Interplay between tight junctions and adherens junctions. Exp. Cell Res. 2017;358:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mann RE, Smart RG, Govoni R. The epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Res. Health. 2003;27:209–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsukamoto H, Machida K, Dynnyk A, et al. "Second hit" models of alcoholic liver disease. Semin. Liver Dis. 2009;29:178–187. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhatia V, Tandon RK. Stress and the gastrointestinal tract. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005;20:332–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Melamed S, Shirom A, Toker S, et al. Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: Evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. Psychol. Bull. 2006;132:327–353. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vitetta L, Anton B, Cortizo F, et al. Mind-body medicine: Stress and its impact on overall health and longevity. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2005;1057:492–505. doi: 10.1196/annals.1322.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:926–938. doi: 10.1172/JCI76304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agoglia AE, Herman MA. The center of the emotional universe: Alcohol, stress, and CRF1 amygdala circuitry. Alcohol. 2018;72:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Centanni SW, Bedse G, Patel S, et al. Driving the downward spiral: alcohol-induced dysregulation of extended amygdala circuits and negative affect. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2019;43:2000–2013. doi: 10.1111/acer.14178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vujanovic AA, Lebeaut A, Zegel M, et al. Post-traumatic stress and alcohol use disorders: Recent advances and future directions in cue reactivity. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2019;30:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Becker HC. Influence of stress associated with chronic alcohol exposure on drinking. Neuropharmacology. 2017;122:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stephens MA, Wand G. Stress and the HPA axis: Role of glucocorticoids in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Res. 2012;34:468–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lovallo WR. Cortisol secretion patterns in addiction and addiction risk. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006;59:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vitellius G, Lombes M. Genetics in endocrinology: Glucocorticoid resistance syndrome. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020;182:R15–R27. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Avila MA, Dufour JF, Gerbes AL, et al. Recent advances in alcohol-related liver disease (ALD): summary of a Gut round table meeting. Gut. 2020;69:764–780. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Conrad KL, Louderback KM, Gessner CP, et al. Stress-induced alterations in anxiety-like behavior and adaptations in plasticity in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Physiol. Behav. 2011;104:248–256. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bosisio D, Polentarutti N, Sironi M, et al. Stimulation of toll-like receptor 4 expression in human mononuclear phagocytes by interferon-gamma: A molecular basis for priming and synergism with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Blood. 2002;99:3427–3431. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.9.3427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang P, Han X, Mo B, et al. LPS enhances TLR4 expression and IFNgamma production via the TLR4/IRAK/NFkappaB signaling pathway in rat pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:3111–3116. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Glybina IV, Kennedy A, Ashton P, et al. Intravitreous delivery of the corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide attenuates retinal degeneration in S334ter-4 rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51:4243–4252. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schweingruber N, Reichardt SD, Luhder F, et al. Mechanisms of glucocorticoids in the control of neuroinflammation. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24:174–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dey A, Hao S, Erion JR, et al. Glucocorticoid sensitization of microglia in a genetic mouse model of obesity and diabetes. J. Neuroimmunol. 2014;269:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kelly KA, Miller DB, Bowyer JF, et al. Chronic exposure to corticosterone enhances the neuroinflammatory and neurotoxic responses to methamphetamine. J. Neurochem. 2012;122:995–1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07864.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Han R, Liu Z, Sun N, et al. BDNF alleviates neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of type 1 diabetic mice via blocking the aberrant HMGB1/RAGE/NF-kappaB pathway. Aging Dis. 2019;10:611–625. doi: 10.14336/AD.2018.0707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xu D, Lian D, Wu J, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces inflammation and hippocampal apoptosis in experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. J. Neuroinflam. 2017;14:156. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0930-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen P, Schnabl B. Host-microbiome interactions in alcoholic liver disease. Gut Liver. 2014;8:237–241. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.3.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sarin SK, Pande A, Schnabl B. Microbiome as a therapeutic target in alcohol-related liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2019;70:260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gangwar R, Meena AS, Shukla PK, et al. Calcium-mediated oxidative stress: A common mechanism in tight junction disruption by different types of cellular stress. Biochem. J. 2017;474:731–749. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mazzon E, Crisafulli C, Galuppo M, et al. Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha in ileum tight junction alteration in mouse model of restraint stress. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G488–505. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00023.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mazzon E, Cuzzocrea S. Role of TNF-alpha in ileum tight junction alteration in mouse model of restraint stress. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008;294:G1268–G1280. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00014.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mazzon E, Sturniolo GC, Puzzolo D, et al. Effect of stress on the paracellular barrier in the rat ileum. Gut. 2002;51:507–513. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.4.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Meewisse ML, Reitsma JB, de Vries GJ, et al. Cortisol and post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2007;191:387–392. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Young EA, Abelson J, Lightman SL. Cortisol pulsatility and its role in stress regulation and health. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2004;25:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cruz-Topete D, Cidlowski JA. One hormone, two actions: Anti- and pro-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. NeuroImmunoModulation. 2015;22:20–32. doi: 10.1159/000362724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cresci GA, Bush K, Nagy LE. Tributyrin supplementation protects mice from acute ethanol-induced gut injury. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2014;38:1489–1501. doi: 10.1111/acer.12428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Glueck B, Han Y, Cresci GAM. Tributyrin Supplementation protects immune responses and vasculature and reduces oxidative stress in the proximal colon of mice exposed to chronic-binge ethanol feeding. J. Immunol. Res. 2018;2018:9671919. doi: 10.1155/2018/9671919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Erickson EK, Grantham EK, Warden AS, et al. Neuroimmune signaling in alcohol use disorder. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2019;177:34–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mai N, Prifti L, Rininger A, et al. Endotoxemia induces lung-brain coupling and multi-organ injury following cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. Exp. Neurol. 2017;297:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM. Sensitivity to glucocorticoid-mediated fast-feedback regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is dependent upon stressor specific neurocircuitry. Brain Res. 2000;870:87–101. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02405-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Reul JM, de Kloet ER. Two receptor systems for corticosterone in rat brain: microdistribution and differential occupation. Endocrinology. 1985;117:2505–2511. doi: 10.1210/endo-117-6-2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Reul JM, de Kloet ER. Anatomical resolution of two types of corticosterone receptor sites in rat brain with in vitro autoradiography and computerized image analysis. J. Steroid. Biochem. 1986;24:269–272. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(86)90063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiol. Rev. 2007;87:873–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Osterlund CD, Rodriguez-Santiago M, Woodruff ER, et al. Glucocorticoid fast feedback inhibition of stress-induced ACTH secretion in the male rat: Rate independence and stress-state resistance. Endocrinology. 2016;157:2785–2798. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Castren E, Thoenen H, Lindholm D. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor messenger RNA is expressed in the septum, hypothalamus and in adrenergic brain stem nuclei of adult rat brain and is increased by osmotic stimulation in the paraventricular nucleus. Neuroscience. 1995;64:71–80. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00386-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Minichiello L, Calella AM, Medina DL, et al. Mechanism of TrkB-mediated hippocampal long-term potentiation. Neuron. 2002;36:121–137. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00942-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cowansage KK, LeDoux JE, Monfils MH. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: A dynamic gatekeeper of neural plasticity. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010;3:12–29. doi: 10.2174/1874467211003010012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Martinowich K, Manji H, Lu B. New insights into BDNF function in depression and anxiety. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:1089–1093. doi: 10.1038/nn1971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jeanneteau FD, Lambert WM, Ismaili N, et al. BDNF and glucocorticoids regulate corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) homeostasis in the hypothalamus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:1305–1310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114122109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Patel R, Gossman W. Alcoholic liver disease. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Im GY. Acute alcoholic hepatitis. Clin. Liver Dis. 2019;23:81–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chaudhry KK, Samak G, Shukla PK, et al. ALDH2 deficiency promotes ethanol-induced gut barrier dysfunction and fatty liver in mice. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2015;39:1465–1475. doi: 10.1111/acer.12777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Meena AS, Shukla PK, Sheth P, et al. EGF receptor plays a role in the mechanism of glutamine-mediated prevention of alcohol-induced gut barrier dysfunction and liver injury. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019;64:128–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shukla, P. K., Meena, A. S., Manda, B., et al. Lactobacillus plantarum prevents and mitigates alcohol-induced disruption of colonic epithelial tight junctions, endotoxemia, and liver damage by an EGF receptor-dependent mechanism. FASEB J. 2018:fj201800351R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Pierre JF, Akbilgic O, Smallwood H, et al. Discovery and predictive modeling of urine microbiome, metabolite and cytokine biomarkers in hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:13418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70461-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zakrzewski M, Proietti C, Ellis JJ, et al. Calypso: A user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome-environment interactions. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:782–783. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, et al. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:4399–4406. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4399-4406.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bengtsson-Palme J, Richardson RT, Meola M, et al. Metaxa2 Database Builder: enabling taxonomic identification from metagenomic or metabarcoding data using any genetic marker. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:4027–4033. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science. 2013;341:1237439. doi: 10.1126/science.1237439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, et al. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011;5:169–172. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.