Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Dec 26;34:106700. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106700

Investment literacy, social influence and undergraduates’ readiness to invest: dataset from Malaysia

Zairihan Abdul Halim a,, Muhammad Nukman Zolkefli a, Suhal Kusairi a, Safwan Mohd Nor a,b, Nur Haiza Muhammad Zawawi a, Muhammad Najit Sukemi a
PMCID: PMC7804600  PMID: 33490327

Abstract

Since the launch of the InvestSmart™ initiative in 2014, the government agencies in Malaysia have been actively engaging community and university students via their outreach programs to promote investment literacy. Given this background, the state of the investment literacy of Malaysian undergraduates and their readiness to invest is intriguing. Therefore, this article offers a dataset of Malaysian undergraduates’ readiness to invest and the role that investment literacy and social influence play in their readiness to invest. Using a non-probability sampling technique, 500 undergraduate students in Malaysia were engaged to participate voluntarily in this survey. Descriptive statistics are presented in this paper. The dataset provides insights into the current state of investment literacy among Malaysian undergraduates, the sources of information on stock investment, and the readiness of these undergraduates to participate in the stock market.

Keywords: Investment literacy, Stock investment, Demography, Readiness, Young adults


Specifications Table

Subject Financial economics
Specific subject area Financial literacy, stock investment
Type of data Table
How data were acquired Fieldwork and online survey
Data format Raw, processed, descriptive
Parameters for data collection We applied a non-probability sampling procedure, distributing both printed and online form questionnaires to student representatives at different universities, who were contacted before questionnaires were distributed.
Description of data collection Our survey was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020. The questionnaires were distributed through fieldwork and an online form. In total, 500 undergraduate students participated voluntarily in the survey.
Data sources location Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia
Data accessibility With the article

Value of the Data

  • This dataset allows the analysis of the current state of investment literacy and readiness to participate in the stock market of a population of young adults in Malaysia (i.e. undergraduates in Malaysian universities).

  • The dataset will inform the implementation of the National Strategy for Financial Literacy 2019–2023.

  • Useful insights can be extracted from this dataset to assist finance or investment curriculum design at the university level.

  • Researchers may employ this dataset to empirically examine the association between investment literacy, social influence, demographic factors and undergraduates’ readiness to invest.

1. Data Description

Since the official launch in 2014 of the nationwide investment-literacy campaign by Malaysia's capital market authority, the government agencies and professional bodies have been taking the initiative to engage the youth population, including university students, via their outreach programs. We provide a dataset describing investment literacy, sources of information and influence on stock investment, and readiness to participate in stock investment among Malaysian undergraduate students. Questionnaires were distributed online and through fieldwork. A total of 500 undergraduate students enrolled in private and public universities in Malaysia between December 2019 and April 2020 participated voluntarily in the survey.

The dataset has three major groups. Part A contains the demographic data of gender, race, area of study, parents’ combined income and college/university zone. Part B contains investment-literacy scores (gathered through 17 quiz-type questions in the questionnaire) that measure participants’ financial knowledge about stocks, bonds, interest rates, and mutual funds. All responses to the questions in this section were rated with a score of one for a correct response and a score of zero for an incorrect response. Part C contains data on social influence, i.e. the sources of information and influence of stock investment. Part D contains data of the investment readiness index. The questionnaire is provided as a supplementary file. Table 1 presents the frequency distribution of our respondents across demographic background, specifically gender, race, area of study, and parents’ combined income.

Table 1.

Demographic information of respondents (n = 500).

Item Freq (n) Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 219 43.6
Female 281 56.2
Race
Malay 334 66.8
Chinese 106 21.2
Indian 48 9.6
Other 12 2.4
Area of study
Arts, humanities, and social sciences 136 27.2
Business, economics, and management 198 39.6
Engineering and technology 119 23.8
Science and mathematics 40 8
Other 7 1.4
Parents' combined monthly income
Less than RM2,000 144 28.8
RM2,001–RM6,000 208 41.6
RM6,001–RM10,000 86 17.2
RM10,001 and above 62 12.4

Table 2 reports the frequency of participants’ responses to investment-related questions. More than 50% of respondents correctly answered several questions about mutual funds and the risk–reward relationship in stock investing. Participants’ knowledge of the function of the stock market and the effect of increasing interest rates on bonds is rather weak.

Table 2.

Responses to investment-literacy questions (17 items).

Item Correct Answer Freq (n) (%) Incorrect Answer Freq (n) (%)
1. Investment in a stock provides share of ownership in a company. 173 34.6 327 65.4
2. Investment in a bond provides a way for investors to lend money to the company. 211 42.2 289 57.8
3. Every stock market performs the following function: It allows common stock to be traded. 195 39 305 61
4. In general, the higher the risk involved in an investment, the greater the return that the market expects from this investment. 273 54.6 227 45.4
5. Suppose you had RM100 in a savings account and the interest rate was 2% per year. After 5 years, how much do you think you would have in the account if you left money to grow? More than RM102 339 67.8 161 32.2
6. If interest rates rise, what will typically happen to bond prices? They will fall 166 33.2 334 66.8
7. If you hold shares of a company, then: whether you have long-term or short-term holdings, you are ashareholder of the company. 281 56.2 219 43.8
8. Which of the following statements describes the main function of the stock market? The stock market brings people who want to buy stocks togetherwith those who want to sell stocks 218 43.6 282 56.4
9. Normally, which asset has the highest fluctuations over time? Stocks 222 44.4 278 55.6
10. When an investor spreads their money among different assets, the risk of losing money decreases. 238 47.6 262 52.4
11. What happens if you buy a company's stock? You own a part of the company/You can vote on shareholderresolutions 264 52.8 236 47.2
12. A stock mutual fund combines the money of many investors to buy a variety of stocks. True 379 75.8 121 24.2
13. If you were to invest 1,000 in a stock mutual fund, it would be possible to have less than 1,000 when you withdraw your money. True 297 59.4 203 40.6
14. An investment with a high return is likely to be a high-risk investment. True 366 73.2 134 26.8
15. Mutual funds have a sure yield that depends on their previous yield. False 194 38.8 306 61.2
16. In the long term, the value of stocks is more volatile than the value of bonds. True 293 58.6 207 41.4
17. When the general level of interest rates increases, the value of bonds also increases. False 207 41.4 293 58.6
Answered all 17 questions correctly 3 0.6

Table 3 presents the participants’ responses about the sources of information and sources of influence of their stock investments. Our data indicate that friends and the internet are important sources of information and influence for stock investment.

Table 3.

Responses to sources of influence of stock investment (7 items).

Item Never (n) (%) Rarely (n) (%) Sometimes (n) (%) Many times (n) (%) Always (n) (%)
In relation to stock investment, how often you were influenced by, learned from, or discussed with the following:
Parents 101 (20.2) 79 (15.8) 152 (30.4) 124 (24.8) 44 (8.8)
Friends 49 (9.8) 79 (15.8) 182 (36.4) 146 (29.2) 44 (8.8)
Internet 15 (3.0) 41 (8.2) 141 (28.2) 180 (36.0) 123 (24.6)
Public seminar or class 64 (12.8) 69 (13.8) 146 (29.2) 137 (27.4) 84 (16.8)
Financial planner or advisor 94 (18.8) 75 (15.0) 137 (27.4) 102 (20.4) 92 (18.4)

Table 4 reports the mean and standard deviations for the investment readiness index across demographic factors. On average, the male respondents have a higher readiness index than the female respondents. Consistent with Khan et al. [3], across ethnicity, Chinese respondents have a higher degree of investment readiness than other ethnicities. Students enrolled in mathematics and science degrees have the highest average investment readiness index, followed by students enrolled in business, economics, and management degrees. In addition, students from middle to upper middle income backgrounds have a higher average investment readiness index compared to those of other income groups.

Table 4.

Index of investment readiness across demographic background.

Investment Adoption Readiness
Mean Std Dev.
Gender
Female 1.74 1.66
Male 2.25 1.72
Race
Malay 1.84 1.70
Chinese 2.32 1.67
Indian 2.25 1.73
Other 0.92 1.44
Area of Study
Arts, humanities, and social sciences 1.42 1.54
Business, economics,
and management 2.24 1.78
Engineering and technology 1.82 1.57
Science and mathematics 2.75 1.75
Other 2.14 1.68
Parents’ combined monthly income
Less than RM2,000 1.43 1.55
RM2,001–RM6,000 2.12 1.70
RM6,001–RM10,000 2.37 1.80
RM10,001 and above 2.06 1.67

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

The primary data collection was performed through an online and field survey. Using a non-probability sampling technique (snowball sampling), a total of 500 printed questionnaires was initially distributed to identified contacts of selected universities located in the central, east coast, and northern regions of Malaysian peninsular. The response rate was 49.4% or 247 completed questionnaires. For the online survey, we created the questionnaire using the Google form. We contacted student representatives from universities outside regions which were not covered during field work. Using social media platform, we provided these students with a link to the online questionnaire and requested them to share the link to their fellow students at respective universities.

Our questionnaire design follows previous studies. Specifically, 17 quiz-type investment-literacy questions were adapted from Balloch et al. [1] and van Rooij et al. [6]. Items on sources of information about stock investment followed several studies, for example, Gerrans et al. [2] and Liang and Guo [4]. Our measure of readiness index was adapted from previous studies examining technology adoption readiness (e.g. [5]). To construct the investment readiness index, we measured participants’ readiness in terms of personal financial management, acquisition of knowledge and skill to invest in stocks, and their familiarity with trading platforms. An equally weighted index was then constructed from the participants’ responses on five yes/no questions capturing their readiness to invest in stocks, with 0 being ‘not ready at all’ and 5 being ‘most ready’.

Ethics Statement

The questionnaire used for this research was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Universiti Malaysia Terengganu. Informed consent was obtained from all respondents before they participated the survey. Participants were informed that the survey was anonymous.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appear to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support provided by the Ministry of Education Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2018/SS01/UMT/02/7). Data collection assistance by Mohd Izzamuddin Nadin, Eswaran Letchumaman and Muhammad Hafizuddin Muhammad Ali are also acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106700.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (47.7KB, docx)
mmc2.docx (24.8KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Balloch A., Nicolae A., Philip D. Stock market literacy, trust, and participation. Rev. Finance. 2015;19(5):1925–1963. doi: 10.1093/rof/rfu040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gerrans P., Moulang C., Feng J., Strydom M. Individual and peer effects in retirement savings investment choices. Pacific Basin Finance J. 2018;47(C):150–165. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khan M.T.I., Tan S.H., Gan G.G.G. Advanced financial literacy of Malaysian Gen Y investors and its consequences. Margin. 2019;13(1):83–108. 10.1177/0973801018800085. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liang P., Guo S. Social interaction, internet access and stock market participation - an empirical study in China. J. Comparative Econ. 2015;43(4):883–901. 10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thakur R., Srivastava M. Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Int. Res. 2014;24(3):369–392. 10.1108/IntR-12-2012-0244. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Rooij M., Lusardi A., Alessie R. Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financ. Econ. 2011;101(2):449–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (47.7KB, docx)
mmc2.docx (24.8KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES