Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2020 Dec 16;26:e925860-1–e925860-7. doi: 10.12659/MSM.925860

Analysis of Serum Markers with Regard to Treatment Procedures in Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer Patients

Edyta Wolny-Rokicka 1,A,B,C,D,E,F,G,, Piotr Petrasz 2,B, Wojciech Krajewski 3,C,G, Sylwia Sulimiera Michalak 4,F, Andrzej Tukiendorf 5,C
PMCID: PMC7805249  PMID: 33326414

Abstract

Background

Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of treatment for locally limited prostate cancer are greatly needed. This knowledge could improve the classification of patients for different methods of treatment and enable better recognition of groups with higher risk of biological recurrence. We prospectively assessed serial blood levels of apoptotic biomarkers and correlated them with response to treatment and clinical factors.

Material/Methods

Blood was collected from 25 patients with prostate cancer before and after surgery, 16 healthy volunteers with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 14 patients with metastasized disease. Immunoenzymatic methods were used to determine circulating apoptotic and inflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), type I receptor (TNFRI), and type II receptor (TNFRII); FAS ligand (FasL); TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRIAL); caspase 8 (Cas8); caspase 9 (Cas9); DNA methylation (metDNA); P-selectin; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The total circulating fragments of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were measured directly in serum.

Results

Peripheral serum prostate-specific antigen increased rapidly together with cfDNA. A negative correlation was noted between tumor volume and TNFRI and TNFRII. Postsurgery P-selectin level was decreased, and metDNA and TNFRII levels were increased. Three comparisons were made between patient groups: surgical vs. BPH; surgical vs. palliative; and palliative vs. BPH. TNFRI, TNFRII, metDNA, P-selectin, Cas8, and FasL were shown to have significant roles.

Conclusions

The study indicated significant roles for cfDNA, both TNF receptors, metDNA, and P-selectin as serum biomarkers in patients with prostate cancer.

MeSH Keywords: Apoptosis Inducing Factor, Caspase 8, Caspase 9, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostatic Neoplasms

Background

Prostate carcinoma (PCa) is the main cause of mortality among men and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality [1]. The treatment strategy for PCa depends on the clinical stage of disease, peripheral serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and the patient’s age. PSA is an organ-specific marker and can vary with several diseases of the prostate gland other than cancer, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis. Consequently, it is difficult to differentiate benign and malignant pathology based on increases in PSA. Furthermore, an estimated 25% of men with PCa do not display elevated levels of serum PSA [2,3]. Researchers have used various PSA figures to improve its clinical utility (age-adjusted PSA range, PSA-velocity, PSA-density, doubling of PSA) [4,5]. PSA testing remains a controversial tool for the early detection of PCa [2,6]. Currently no single serum or urine biomarker is sufficient for highly sensitive and specific detection of PCa and for the differentiation between indolent and aggressive PCa.

Numerous commercially available biomarker tests that use a liquid biopsy for the detection of PCa provide results that qualify patients for prostate biopsy, but PSA cutoff values differ between studies [7]. Presently only 5 of these tests are commercially used (Oncotype Dx Prostate, Prolaris, Decipher, Decipher PORTOS, ProMark) [7]. Therefore, more studies on proper individual use are needed to improve clinical treatment at different stages of disease. Prostate adenocarcinomas are heterogeneous. Based on the architectural pattern associated with the Gleason score, stromogenic, cribriform, and intraductal carcinoma may have more adverse prognostic implications than other grade 4 patterns [8,9]. During metastasis from the primary tumor site, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enter the circulatory system [10,11] and can serve as biomarkers for liquid biopsy. In the bloodstream CTCs manifest by at least 2 mechanisms: (1) epithelial-mesenchymal transition, in which tumor cells lose their epithelial phenotype and acquire mesenchymal traits [12], and (2) elimination of cells by external forces, such as surgery [12]. CTCs are found as apoptotic populations and as specific subpopulations, depending on the stage of the disease. Analysis via blood (i.e., liquid biopsy) enables assessment of tumor transformation and the biology of the tumor [13]. In the future such analyses could reduce the number of unnecessary invasive diagnostic tests (e.g., prostate biopsy) in patients with false-positive PSA, especially in the subgroup of individuals with “gray zone” PSA values. These methods could complement the processes of staging the cancer, with the biomarkers offering valuable information about an individual patient’s disease. In clinical practice, additional tests are necessary and are routinely used to complement imaging tests in choosing the optimal treatment option for patients. Radical treatment methods include surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or a combination of both, sometimes in further combination with hormonotherapy. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonotherapy are also used in palliative treatment. Surgery is a valuable choice of treatment for removing tumors in younger patients with PCa in early clinical stages. RT destroys tumor tissue by killing the tumor cells, and it possibly modulates the patient’s immune response.

Here we describe the situation in which cells actively continue apoptosis after surgery and radiotherapy. This prospective study was intended to assess this modulation and to find any correlation between clinical features and mediators of apoptosis, such as blood/serum-based indicators. In the future, such indicators could provide information about response and resistance factors in therapy.

Material and Methods

Patients characteristics

Thirty-nine patients with PCa and 16 healthy volunteers with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) were recruited by the Urology Department and Radiotherapy Department at the Multidisciplinary Hospital in Gorzow (Poland) and enrolled in this study. Participants were tested with pretreatment biopsies. All patients were clinically diagnosed with PCa confirmed by histopathological examination and categorized according to clinical stage. Among the patients, 25 had prostatectomy procedures (surgical group) and 14 underwent palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases (palliative group). No participants had any other type of tumor. Surgical patients had not undergone chemo- or endocrinological therapy before the surgery. Palliative patients underwent endocrinological therapy. For each patient the following data were collected: clinical stage, Gleason score, serum PSA level, and transrectal ultrasonography-based prostate volume. Peripheral serum was obtained before and after surgery and before radiotherapy. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and healthy volunteers (BPH group). The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Chamber in Zielona Góra No 18/129/2019. Clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients.

PCa (surgical) PCa (palliative) Control – BPH
Patients: Number of patients (%) 25 (64.1) 14 (35.9) 16 (100)

Feature: Average (min–max)

Prostate volume mL 47.12 (30–80) 45.21 (20–84) 59.88 (35–90)
Age years 66.28 (53–82) 69.29 (55–88) 69.44 (51–82)
PSA ng/mL 12.62 (6–67) 103.61 (4.7–616) 3.39 (0.2–11)

Number of patients (%)

Gleason score:
 1–6 12 (48) 3 (21.43)
 7 10 (40) 2 (14.29)
 8–10 3 (12) 9 (64.28)

Pathological stage:
 T1 6 (24) 0 (0)
 T2a 5 (20) 0 (0)
 T2b 8 (32) 0 (0)
 T2c 4 (16) 8 (57.14)
 T3a 2 (8) 2 (14.29)
 T3b 0 (0) 1 (7.14)
 T4 0 (0) 3 (21.43)

Groups of medications use:

 Statin 10 (40) 1 (7.1) 2 (12.5)
 Antidiabetic 5 (20) 2 (14.29) 0 (0)
 Antihypertensive 15 (60) 4 (28.57) 2 (14.29)
 Cardiological 12 (48) 2 (14.29) 0 (0)
 ADT 0 (0) 14 (100) 0 (0)

PCa – prostate cancer; BPH – benign prostatic hyperplasia; PSA – prostate-specific antigen; ADT – androgen deprivation therapy;

Radiotherapy treatment

The radiation procedure was performed using a 6-MV photon beam. Palliative patients received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a conventional hypofractionalization of 4–8 Gy for a total dose of 6–20 Gy.

Blood collection

Blood samples were taken from the median cubital vein between 7: 00 and 8: 00 AM using S-Monovette tubes (Sarstedt, Austria). Within 60 min, they were centrifuged at 1000 g and 4°C for 20 min. Aliquots of serum were stored at −80°C until further analysis.

Apoptotic and inflammatory mediators

Serum tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were determined by R&D Systems kit (USA) and DRG International (USA), and their detection limits were 0.038 pg/mL and 0.001 mg/L, respectively. Tumor necrosis factor type I receptors (TNFRI) and type II receptors (TNFRII) were evaluated by Abcam kits (UK), and their detection limits were 1 pg/mL and 5 pg/mL, respectively. FAS ligand (FasL) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRIAL) as well as caspase 8 (Cas8) and caspase 9 (Cas9) were evaluated by Thermo Fisher kits (USA). The detection limits for FasL, TRIAL, Cas8, and Cas9 were 0.07 ng/mL, 5 pg/mL, 0.1 ng/mL, and 0.4 ng/mL, respectively. DNA methylation (metDNA) was measured by a Cayman kit (USA) with a detection limit of 1.17 ng/mL. P-selectin was determined by DRG Diagnostics (USA) with a limit detection of 0.6 ng/mL. All samples were analyzed in duplicate or triplicate in a single assay to avoid interassay variability. The average intra-assay coefficient of variation for the kits was <5–8%. The total circulating fragments of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were measured directly in serum using a Quant-iTTM DNA high-sensitivity assay kit and a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were analyzed in duplicate, and the mean of the 2 measurements was used as the final value. The intra-assay CV for the Quant-iTTM DNA high-sensitivity assay was <2%.

Statistical analysis

Since a change of concentrations before and after surgical procedure of the analyzed biomarkers over time was assessed, multilevel (hierarchical) modeling was applied [14]. Because random variation in results was expected from the current longitudinal models, additional random effects were structured. In turn, in the intergroup comparisons, due to the nonnormal distribution of morphological factors, the nonparametric Wilcoxon’s test for independent samples was carried out. The computation was performed in the R statistical platform [15]. Similar interpretation of the results obtained by the implemented statistical models was also provided in our previous study [16].

Results

Surgical group

The modifications as morphological changes in apoptotic cell death were analyzed before and after surgery and were compared between advanced and BPH groups. The results showed that hsCRP and P-selectin decreased after surgery: 0.74 mg/L (P=0.00) and 0.90 ng/mL (P=0.01), respectively. TNFRII and metDNA increased significantly after surgery by 34 pg/mL (P=0.04) and 1.6 ng/mL (P=0.02), respectively. The effect of surgery on TNFRI, FasL, TRIAL, Cas8, Cas9, and cfDNA was insignificant. The inclusion of clinical factors in the surgical group resulted in the following changes.

Tumor

An increase in tumor volume by 1 cm3 was associated with decreases in TNFRI and TNFRII by 0.58 pg/mL (P=0.04) and 2.28 pg/mL (P=0.01), respectively. Each increase of PSA by 1 ng/mL was associated with an increase of cfDNA by 4.25 ng/mL (P=0.03).

Age

Cas9 decreased after surgery by 0.35 ng/mL (P=0.0123) for each year of patient age (therefore, in the older population this decrease was more rapid than in younger patients). In the oldest subjects, compared with younger, the cfDNA and TNFRII increased by 7.82 ng/mL (P=0.0372) and 12.6 pg/mL (P=0.0055) per year, respectively.

Medications

Cardiological medications caused an increase in FasL receptor of 0.01 ng/mL (P= 0.01) and a decrease in P-selectin by 4 ng/mL (P=0.0013). Antidiabetic medications caused a decrease in metDNA by 7.24 ng/mL (P=0.0047) and increased TNFRI by 12.9 pg/mL (P=0.0368). Medication-free treatment resulted in increases in Cas8 and metDNA by 0.007 ng/mL (P=0.01) and 4.58 ng/mL (P=0.00). Other factors, including hsCRP, TNF-α, TRIAL, and Cas9, were not affected by the use of medications.

Intergroup results

The statistically significant differences between groups (surgical vs. BPH group, surgical vs. palliative group, palliative vs. BPH group) are presented in Table 2. Additionally, an increase in FasL by 0.67 ng/mL (P=0.008) was found to correlate with an increase in PSA in the palliative group. The other factors were statistically insignificant.

Table 2.

Comparison between groups: surgical vs. benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); surgical vs. palliative; palliative vs. BPH.

Comparison Mean±SD Mean±SD Median Median p-Value
Surgical vs. BPH Surgical BPH Surgical BPH
PSA ng/ml 12.6±13.6 3.4±2.7 8.0 3 p=0.000
hsCRP mg/l 6.7±3.8 5.8±4.9 6.5 3.4 p=0.005
TNFRI pg/ml 57±16.1 86.3±114.8 51.3 55.3 p=0.02
TNFRII pg/ml 1128±150 1368±240 1157 1337 p=0.00
Cas8 ng/ml 0.111±0.004 0.114±0.005 0.109 0.112 p=0.02
Surgical vs. palliative Surgical Palliative Surgical Palliative
PSA ng/ml 12.6±13.6 104±160 8 65 p=0.000
hsCRP mg/l 6.7±3.8 9.1±4.3 6.5 11.3 p=0.05
TNFRII pg/ml 1128±150 1507±248 1157 1485 p=0.00
metDNA ng/ml 69.1±5.8 67.7±6.5 69.2 66.5 p=0.06
P-selectin ng/ml 14.2±4 192±92 13 238 p=0.00
Palliative vs. BPH Palliative BPH Palliative BPH
hsCRP mg/l 9.1±4.3 5.8±4.9 11.3 3.4 p=0.002
P-selectin ng/ml 192±92 14.6±4.8 238 14.2 p=0.000
metDNA ng/ml 67.7±6.5 72.1±5.2 66.5 73.5 p=0.05

SD – the standard deviation; BPH – benign prostatic hyperplasia; PSA – prostate-specific antigen; hsCRP – high sensitivity C-reactive protein; TNFRI – type I receptors, tumour necrosis factor; TNFRII – type II receptors, tumour necrosis factor; Cas8 – caspase 8; metDNA – DNA methylation.

Discussion

The constant process of apoptosis is an important biological phenomenon. When it malfunctions, it can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation resulting in cancer [17,18]. Three main types of changes in apoptosis are observed: (1) activation of caspases, (2) DNA and protein breakdown, and (3) membrane changes and recognition by phagocytic cells [19]. Patients with PCa undergo different treatment modalities that possibly influence cellular immunity in different ways. Radical prostatectomy is a very effective method because the whole organ with the tumor is removed. Surgery and RT result in a type of immunosurveillance for cancer cells. The absence of prostate-associated lymphocytes is one of the possible mechanisms by which this immunosurveillance is avoided [20]. The mechanism of cellular cytotoxicity depends on the particular TNF family. They lead to an activation of the effector caspases pathways in the final stage of apoptosis. This process ends when contact with the target cell is lost, which is synonymous with cell death [21]. Caspases are a family of proteases that play a central role in the processes of apoptosis (e.g., caspase-2, -3, -6, -7, -8, -9, and -10). They are defined as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes due to their proteolytic activity. Caspases are the initiators and the executioners of apoptosis. The initiation pathways form both the intrinsic (mitochondrial) and extrinsic (the death receptor) pathways of apoptosis [22]. The intrinsic pathway begins within a cell. This process is triggered by factors such as genetic damage, hypoxia, severe oxidative stress, and extremely high concentrations of cytosolic Ca2+ [23]. Cas9 is part of a large quaternary protein structure known as apoptosome (made up of cytochrome c, Apaf-1, and Cas9), which activates caspase 3 via cytoplasmic release of cytochrome c [24]. The extrinsic death receptor pathway binds death ligands to death receptors. The activation of TNF-α results from the binding of 2 receptors (TNFRI and TNFRII) on the cell membrane. The best-known death receptors are TNFRI and a related protein Fas (CD95) whose ligands are TNF and Fas ligand (FasL), respectively [25]. After the binding of the death ligand to the death receptor and then to an adaptor protein, a death-inducing signaling complex is created. With the presence of Cas8, a cascade is initiated, leading to apoptosis [22]. Another receptor belonging to the TNF family, TRIAL, has the ability to induce apoptosis in cancer cells, while being nontoxic for physiological cells [26].

The effects of surgery and medication in apoptosis

Within our study sample, an increased volume of the prostate gland correlated with decreases in TNFRI and TNFRII, and an increase in PSA was correlated with an increase in cfDNA. After the removal of the prostate gland, an increase in TNFRII and metDNA and a decrease in hsCRP and P-selectin were observed. With each year of age of the patients, TNFRII and cfDNA increased and Cas9 decreased. The medications taken by patients had the following effects on the status of apoptosis mediators. Antidiabetic drugs caused a decrease in metDNA and an increase in TNFRI, while cardiological drugs led to a decrease of P-selectin and an increase of FasL. No use of medication resulted in an increase in metDNA and Cas8.

Intergroup results

This study investigated the correlation of the inflammation biomarker hsCRP with the existing tumor and its stage. An increase in both TNFRI and TNFRII was observed in the BPH group in comparison with the early-stage and the palliative group. The BPH group also showed an increase of immunoreactions to Cas8 compared with the early-stage group. FasL was correlated with an increased PSA concentration in the palliative group. A study by Rodríguez-Berriguete et al. [27] reached similar conclusions. They observed that tumor expression of TNF-α and TNFRI was significantly correlated with a poor prognosis and with clinicopathological features. BPH is characterized by a fast cell transformation; therefore, within this group, immunoreactions to both TNF-α receptors increased compared with normal prostate glands [28]. In another study, Chadha et al. [29] found that TNFRI and TNF-α are supportive factors alongside PSA in distinguishing men with and without PCa.

cfDNA

A large number of studies have indicated that PCa patients present with higher cfDNA concentrations than controls [3036]. However, other studies have reported nonspecific increases in cfDNA in cancer patients [37,38]. According to the results of our study, surgical patients did not show any significant differences in the concentration of cfDNA, which was similar to findings from van der Pol and Mouliere [39] in a study on early-stage brain tumors. However, higher PSA was correlated with higher cfDNA, which was also found in previous studies [40,41]. Importantly, the current study confirmed that the concentration of cfDNA increases with age. Circulating cfDNA is the fraction of DNA released by tumor cells to the bloodstream, and it is affected by the size of the tumor and its stage and cell type [42,43]. The time from the initiation of cell death to the final cellular fragmentation depends on injurious agents and the apoptotic pathways [44]. In addition, the final concentration of cfDNA in the bloodstream depends on the rate of degradation and clearance [45,46].

MetDNA

Some epigenetic changes are described as conversions in the structure of DNA, with the main change being DNA methylation (hypermethylation and hypomethylation). These disturbances can lead to malignant transformations. In comparisons of the early stages of neoplastic transformation with PCa metastasis, hypomethylation has been observed to prevail in the latter [47]. The methylation pattern and its changes can directly contribute to tissue transformation into cancer [48]. As a consequence of this process, either hypermethylation or hypomethylation takes place [4951]. The measurements of these DNA alterations (methylation or mutations) in blood have been used in the diagnosis of PCa [36,52]. Our findings indicate statistically significant differences between metDNA levels in patients from different groups: early-stage vs. surgery, early-stage vs. palliative, and palliative vs. BPH.

Medication

The study additionally investigated how the use of medications affected metDNA levels. It was observed that the use of antidiabetic drugs resulted in a decrease in the metDNA level compared with no use of medications.

P-selectin

P-selectin (GMP-140, CD62P) is an adhesion molecule localized in platelet granules and in Weibel-Palade bodies of vascular endothelium. P-selectin is induced by inflammatory mediators, and its main task is to bind circulating leukocytes to vascular endothelium during the inflammatory response to activate the processes connected with binding leukocytes to platelets [53]. An increase in P-selectin expression on the surface platelets could be a biomarker in some types of cancer, including breast, lung, kidney, and colon cancers [54,55]. Our current study, as in a previous one [56], showed that the P-selectin level decreased after surgery and increased in the palliative group. Cardiological medications reduced the level of this adhesion molecule.

Conclusions

Various medical studies suggest that defects within apoptotic pathways play a crucial role in carcinogenesis. In this small sample study, we observed that cfDNA, both TNF receptors, metDNA, and P-selectin played a significant role in this process. A larger study could elucidate the exact role of these factors. Monitoring them together with PSA level could be a useful further tool in testing the biochemical recurrence or progression of the disease.

Acknowledgments

We extend gratitude toward B. Morawin, PhD, A. Tylutka, PhD and A. Zembroń-Łacny, PhD for cooperation in this study.

Footnotes

Conflict of interests

None.

Source of support: Multidisciplinary Hospital in Gorzów Wielkopolski and Medical University in Wrocław

References

  • 1.Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richie JP, Catalona WJ, Ahmann FR, et al. Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Urology. 1993;42:365–74. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90359-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mitchell ID, Croal BL, Dickie A, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the role of complexed prostate specific antigen and free/total prostate specific antigen ratio for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;165:1549–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stephan C, Jung K, Diamandis EP, et al. Prostate-specific antigen, its molecular forms, and other kallikrein markers for detection of prostate cancer. Urology. 2002;59:2–8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01449-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heidegger I, Skradski V, Steiner E, et al. High risk of under-grading and -staging in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0115537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alford AV, Brito JM, Yadav KK, et al. The use of biomarkers in prostate cancer screening and treatment. Rev Urol. 2017;19(4):221–34. doi: 10.3909/riu0772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee TK, Ro JY. Spectrum of cribriform proliferations of the prostate: From benign to malignant. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142:938–46. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0005-RA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McKenney JK, Wei W, Hawley S, et al. Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma can be further optimized: Analysis of the relative prognostic strength of individual architectural patterns in 1275 patients from the Canary retrospective cohort. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:1439–56. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Clinical applications of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA as liquid biopsy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(5):479–91. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen LC, Bode AM, Dong ZG. Circulating tumor cells: Moving biological insights into detection. Theranostics. 2017;7(10):2606–19. doi: 10.7150/thno.18588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Camara O, Kavallaris A, Noschel H, et al. Seeding of epithelial cells into circulation during surgery for breast cancer: The fate of malignant and benign mobilized cells. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-4-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salami SS, Hovelson DH, Kaplan JB, et al. Transcriptomic heterogeneity in multifocal prostate cancer. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e123468. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.123468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. Springer; 2002. Available from: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/ [Google Scholar]
  • 15.R Core Team. R:A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.6.3. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.r-project.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wolny-Rokicka E, Brzeźniakiewicz-Janus K, Wydmański J, et al. Analysis of haemostasis biomarkers in patients with advanced stage lung cancer during hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:1876–83. doi: 10.1177/0300060517750976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mohan H. Textbook of pathology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2010. pp. 21–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Merkle CJ. Cellular adaptation, injury, and death. In: Porth CM, Matfin G, editors. Pathophysiology: Concepts of altered health states. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. pp. 94–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC. Robbins and Cotran: Pathologic basis of disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Di Carlo E, D’Antuono T, Pompa P, et al. The lack of epithelial interleukin-7 and BAFF/BLyS gene expression in prostate cancer as a possible mechanism of tumor escape from immunosurveillance. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2979–87. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gołąb J, Jakóbisiak M, Lasek W, Stokłosa T. Immunologia. 7th ed. Warsaw, PWN: 2015. [in Polish] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong RSY. Apoptosis in cancer: From pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:87. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karp G. Cell and molecular biology: concepts and experiments. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2008. pp. 653–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Brenner C. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilisation in cell death. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:99–163. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hengartner MO. Apoptosis: corralling the corpses. Cell. 2000;104:325–28. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00219-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wiley S, Schooley K, Smolak P, et al. Identification and characterisation of a new member of the TNF family that induced apoptosis. Immunity. 1995;3:673–82. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rodríguez-Berriguete G, Sánchez-Espiridión B, Cansino JR, et al. Clinical significance of both tumor and stromal expression of components of the IL-1 and TNF-α signaling pathways in prostate cancer. Cytokine. 2013;64:555–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Miguel MP, Royuela M, Bethencourt FR, et al. Immunoexpression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and its receptors 1 and 2 correlates with proliferation/apoptosis equilibrium in normal, hyperplasic and carcinomatous human prostate. Cytokine. 2000;12:535–38. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1999.0585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chadha KC, Miller A, Nair BB, et al. New serum biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2014;3:72–79. doi: 10.4103/2278-0513.125802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reis IM, Ramachandran K, Speer C, et al. Serum GADD45a methylation is a useful biomarker to distinguish benign vs. malignant prostate disease. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:460–68. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wroclawski ML, Serpa-Neto A, Fonseca FLA, et al. Cell-free plasma DNA as biochemical biomarker for the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer patients. Tumor Biol. 2013;34:2921–27. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feng J, Gang F, Li X, et al. Plasma cell-free DNA and its DNA integrity as biomarker to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with increased serum prostate-specific antigen. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:1023–28. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0491-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ellinger J, Bastian PJ, Haan KI, et al. Noncancerous PTGS2 DNA fragments of apoptotic origin in sera of prostate cancer patients qualify as diagnostic and prognostic indicators. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:138–43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Altimari A, Grigioni AD, Benedettini E, et al. Diagnostic role of circulating free plasma DNA detection in patients with localized prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:756–62. doi: 10.1309/DBPX1MFNDDJBW1FL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Papadopoulou E, Davilas E, Sotiriou V, et al. Cell-free DNA and RNA in plasma as a new molecular marker for prostate cancer. Oncol Res. 2004;14:439–45. doi: 10.3727/0965040041791473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Allen D, Butt A, Cahill D, et al. Role of cell-free plasma DNA as a diagnostic marker for prostate cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1022:76–80. doi: 10.1196/annals.1318.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roth C, Pantel K, Müller V, et al. Apoptosis-related deregulation of proteolytic activities and high serum levels of circulating nucleosomes and DNA in blood correlate with breast cancer progression. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stoetzer OJ, Fersching DM, Salat C, et al. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients by circulating apoptotic biomarkers nucleosomes, DNAse, cytokeratin-18 fragments and survivin. Cancer Lett. 2013;336:140–48. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van der Pol Y, Mouliere F. Toward the early detection of cancer by decoding the epigenetic and environmental fingerprints of cell-free DNA. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:350–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shaw JA, Stebbing J. Circulating free DNA in the management of breast cancer. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2:3. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2013.06.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Seyedolmohadessin SM, Akbari MT, Nourmohammadi Z, et al. Assessing the diagnostic value of plasma-free DNA in prostate cancer screening. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22:331–37. doi: 10.29252/ibj.22.5.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fan G, Zhang K, Yang X, et al. Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in patients with colon cancer: Systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goodall J, Mateo J, Yuan W, et al. Circulating cell-free DNA to guide prostate cancer treatment with PARP inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:1006–17. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ziegler U, Groscurth P. Morphological features of cell death. News Physiol Sci. 2004;19:124–28. doi: 10.1152/nips.01519.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jacobus Bronkhorst A, Ungerer V, Holdenrieder S. The emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019;18:17. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Herbreteau G, Vallée A, Charpentier S, et al. Circulating free tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Clinical application and future perspectives. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:113–26. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nowacka-Zawisza M, Wiśnik E. DNA methylation and histone modifications as epigenetic regulation in prostate cancer (Review) Oncol Rep. 2017;38:2587–96. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Worm J, Guldberg P. DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway to cancer and a promising target for anticancer therapy. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002;32:443–49. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2002.00034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:286–88. doi: 10.1038/nrg2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Robertson KD, Jones PA. DNA methylation: Past, present and future directions. Carcinogenesis. 2002;21:461–67. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Watson RE, Curtin GM, Doolittle DJ, Goodman JI. Progressive alteration in global and GC-rich DNA methylation during tumorigenesis. Toxicol Sci. 2003;75:289–99. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ellinger J, Müller DC, Müller SC, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DNA in serum: A universal diagnostic biomarker for patients with urological malignancies. Urol Oncol. 2012;30:509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Merten M, Thiagarajan P. P-selectin expression on platelets determines size and stability of platelets aggregates. Circulation. 2000;102:1931–36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.16.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dymicka-Piekarska V, Matowicka-Karna J, Gryko M, et al. Relationship between soluble P-selectin and inflammatory factors (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) in colorectal cancer. Throm Res. 2007;120:585–90. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dymicka-Piekarska V, Matowicka-Karna J, Osada J, et al. Changes in platelet CD 62P expression and soluble P-selectin concentration in surgically treated colorectal carcinoma. Adv Med Sci. 2006;51:304–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wolny-Rokicka E, Tukiendorf A, Wydmański J, Zembroń-Łacny A. The potential of the quick detection of selectins using Raman spectroscopy to discriminate lung cancer patients from healthy subjects. J Spectrosc (Hindawi) 2018;2018 78432085. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES