Abstract
Background
Noninvasive imaging autopsy alternatives for fetuses weighing <500 grams are limited. Microfocus computed tomography has been reported as a viable option in small case series with the potential to avoid an invasive autopsy. Implementation of postmortem microfocus computed tomography in a large cohort as part of routine clinical service has yet been unreported, and realistic “autopsy prevention rates” are unknown.
Objective
This study aimed to describe the range of abnormalities detectable on fetal microfocus computed tomography in a clinical setting and additional findings identified on the antenatal ultrasound and to estimate the invasive autopsy avoidance rate (ie, cases in which imaging was sufficient to deem autopsy unnecessary).
Study Design
A prospective observational case series of all fetuses referred for microfocus computed tomography imaging at a single institution was conducted for 3 years (2016–2019). Imaging was reported by 2 pediatric radiologists before autopsy, with “decision to proceed” based on the specialist perinatal pathologists’ judgment and parental consent. Agreement rates between microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound were evaluated, and where feasible, diagnostic accuracy for microfocus computed tomography was calculated using autopsy as a reference standard.
Results
A total of 268 fetuses were included (2–350 grams body weight; 11–24 weeks’ gestation), with cause for demise in 122 of 268 (45.5%). Of the 122 fetuses, 64 (52.5%) exhibited fetal anomalies. Although 221 of 268 (82.5%) fetuses had consent for invasive autopsy, only 29 of the 221 (13.1%) underwent this procedure, which implied an autopsy avoidance rate of 192 of 221 (86.9%). Complete agreement was present for all brain, thoracic, and abdominal pathologies, whereas sensitivity and specificity for cardiac anomalies were 66.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound agreement was found in 219 of 266 cases (81.9%), with partial agreement in 21 of 266 (7.9%) and disagreement in 26 of 266 (10.5%), mostly because of additional cardiac, soft tissue, or genitourinary findings by microfocus computed tomography, which were not seen on the ultrasound.
Conclusion
Fetal microfocus computed tomography imaging is a viable and useful tool for imaging early gestational fetuses and can avoid the need for invasive autopsy. Confirmation of antenatal diagnoses is achieved in most cases, and additional anomalies may also be detected.
Key words: autopsy, congenital anomalies, diagnosis, microfocus computed tomography, minimally invasive, miscarriage, postmortem, radiology, termination, virtual autopsy
AJOG at a Glance.
Why was the study conducted?
This study aimed to evaluate the use of postmortem fetal microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) as a clinical service for less invasive perinatal autopsies.
Key findings
Fetal anomalies were present in 25% of all micro-CT cases, and micro-CT confirmed the antenatal ultrasound findings in >80% of cases. Additional anomalies were detected on ultrasound in approximately 10% of cases. In almost 90% of cases, the perinatal pathologists did not believe additional invasive autopsy was necessary after micro-CT imaging.
What does this add to what is known?
Micro-CT has already been shown to have a high diagnostic accuracy rate for detecting fetal anomalies. We demonstrate that its application as a clinical imaging service is feasible, providing additional information in early gestation antenatal ultrasound alone, and could potentially avoid the need for invasive autopsies.
Current modern antenatal ultrasound techniques1, 2, 3 and screening tools, such as cell-free DNA,4,5 have led to earlier diagnoses of chromosomal and structural anomalies and earlier terminations of pregnancy (TOPs). Despite the high diagnostic accuracy of these tests, formal perinatal autopsy has traditionally remained the reference standard of care in confirming suspected anomalies, particularly to direct counseling and future pregnancy management.
However, parental acceptability of autopsy is decreasing, and perinatal autopsy at early gestational ages is technically challenging and disfiguring. Tissue breakdown after in utero demise (autolysis and/or maceration) results in a loss of anatomic detail which, combined with delicate dissection, can mean that some diagnoses are hard to determine at autopsy. Furthermore, parents are increasingly opting for noninvasive autopsy alternatives6 because they do not wish for large incisions.7,8 Larger fetuses can be imaged using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques,9,10 but these are nondiagnostic for fetuses weighing below 500 grams (g) body weight (approximately 18 weeks’ gestation),11 even at higher magnetic field strengths,12 because of limited image resolution.
Microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT), combined with an iodinated contrast agent, has been found to be feasible for this purpose,13 imaging ex vivo human fetal brains,14 hearts,15,16 and renal tissue17 at almost histologic resolution. Furthermore, recently published feasibility micro-CT research on imaging whole fetuses suggests high concordance rates compared with conventional autopsy.18 We now offer all bereaved parents the option for micro-CT imaging as part of a routine clinical autopsy service, where appropriate.
In this study, we describe the experience with this modality in terms of diagnostic yield and findings using postmortem fetal micro-CT in a large clinical dataset. Our objectives were to define the clinical diagnostic accuracy rates against an autopsy reference standard (where applicable) to describe findings detected on micro-CT compared with antenatal ultrasound and to estimate the autopsy avoidance rate through this service (ie, cases in which imaging was sufficient to deem autopsy unnecessary).
Materials and Methods
Patient selection
In this single center, prospective study, we reviewed all cases referred for specialist perinatal autopsy over a 3-year period (October 1, 2016 to December 1, 2019). All parents were routinely offered noninvasive imaging methods and standard autopsy as part of a perinatal autopsy investigation (including micro-CT). We included all fetuses measuring <30 cm in crown-heel length (CHL) and <5 kg (based on scanner manufacturer’s recommendations). There were no exclusion criteria.
Tissue preparation
Before micro-CT imaging, all fetuses underwent a skeletal survey (ie, whole body radiography/babygram) and an external examination by 1 of 7 specialist pediatric pathologists (all with >10 years of pediatric pathology experience), including placental examination, where available.19
Fetuses were immersed in a solution of 10% formalin and potassium triiodide (I2KI or Lugol’s iodine; total iodine content of 63.25 mg/mL). Fetuses were stored at room temperature until fully iodinated (for ≥96 hours), rinsed, and dried before micro-CT imaging. After micro-CT, fetuses were “deiodinated” to remove superficial brown skin discoloration (Supplemental Figure 1) by immersion in sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate.18
Microfocus computed tomography examination
Imaging of the fetuses were acquired using 1 of 2 micro-CT scanners located on-site (XTH 225 ST or Med-X Alpha; Nikon Metrology, Tring, United Kingdom), both equipped with a multimetal target. All imaging was undertaken by 1 of 4 trained members of the research team (S.C.S, J.C.H, A.G. or I.C.S). Fetuses were secured within the scanner using foam supports, moisture absorbent wrapping material, and Parafilm M (Bemis Company, Inc, Oshkosh, WI) to ensure mechanical stability. Imaging parameters varied according to fetal size, with X-ray energies and beam current ranging between 60 and 160 kV and 78 and 350 μA, respectively. Exposure times ranged from 88 to 1000 ms, with 1 X-ray frame per projection, with a total number of projections varying between 1066 and 3141.
Projection images acquired by the scanner were reconstructed using modified Feldkamp filtered back-projection algorithms with proprietary software (CTPro3D; Nikon Metrology, United Kingdom) and postprocessed using VGStudio MAX 3.0 (Volume Graphics GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Isotropic voxel sizes varied according to specimen size and magnification, ranging from 18.6 μm to 121.7 μm.
Image analysis
All micro-CT images were evaluated and reported by 2 pediatric radiologists in consensus (O.J.A. and S.C.S., with 15 and 4 years of postmortem pediatric radiological experience, respectively). Radiologists were provided with the gestational age of the fetus, mode of death, and a brief summary of suspected prenatal fetal anomalies, if present (eg, 14 weeks’ gestation, TOP for suspected cardiac abnormality). Radiologists were blinded to the antenatal ultrasound report and images.
Autopsy examination
The decision to perform an invasive autopsy after micro-CT imaging was guided by the imaging findings, parental consent, placental histology findings, and the pathologist’s opinion regarding potential additional benefit of further examination. For example, if the micro-CT findings were normal in the setting of an unremarkable antenatal history or confirmed the antenatal suspicions or indicated marked maceration, which would make further autopsy difficult and potentially futile, then further examination was generally not conducted. However, if there was uncertainty regarding the diagnosis on micro-CT or findings that conflicted with the antenatal examination findings, then the pathologist would take a subjective approach as to the importance of resolving this difference with an autopsy, assuming parental consent was provided, and a placental cause was not present.
All autopsies were conducted in line with the standards set by the Royal College of Pathologists.19 For cases in which consent was provided only for minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), these were conducted through either ultrasound-guided20 or laparoscopic-guided biopsy techniques.21 In our department, a death classification system is not used routinely, although a narrative exploration of findings linked to clinical history is provided in the final autopsy report.
Data collection, analysis, and evaluation
Demographic details (including gestational age, mode of death [ie, termination, miscarriage], postmortem weight, crown rump length, CHL, head circumference, referred maternity unit, parental consent), time for fetal preparation (ie, days spent in iodine solution), date and results of the micro-CT imaging, antenatal ultrasound findings, and subsequent autopsy and placental histology were inputted into an independent database (Microsoft Excel, Seattle, WA).
Imaging and pathology results were all assigned as being normal, abnormal, or nondiagnostic (ie, macerated/degraded tissue) for 8 different body areas (ie, brain, spine, thorax, cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal system, genitourinary system, skeletal system, soft tissue). Free-text comments regarding the specific abnormality of each body part was also documented.
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of micro-CT, we used conventional autopsy (where performed) as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance rates for overall diagnosis and per body part were calculated using exact methods in Microsoft Excel.
We also calculated the agreement rate in diagnoses between the most recent antenatal ultrasound report and the micro-CT findings for fetal structural anomalies. Diagnoses were compared and categorized into cases in which there was full agreement, partial agreement (ie, some pathologies detected, others not seen on ultrasound, or an anomaly identified in the same body area, but not the same type), or complete disagreement. For the purposes of calculating agreement, if there was no discordance in findings (including nondiagnostic cases by either modality), then we regarded the imaging findings to be in agreement. Descriptive statistics using percentages were used.
Results
Demographics
Over the 38-month (approximately 3 years) study period, 268 fetuses who were referred to our institution from 11 different maternity units were imaged. The average gestational age was 16 weeks (range, 11–24 weeks), with body weight of 66 g (range, 3–350 g) and CHL of 14 cm (range, 6–26 cm). Demographic details are summarized in Supplemental Tables 1 and 2. Fetal tissue autolysis and maceration rendered several body parts noninterpretable or nondiagnostic, which included 129 of 268 brains (48.1%) (Supplemental Figure 2), 4 of 268 spines (1.5%), 2 of 268 hearts (0.8%), and 2 of 268 abdomens (0.8%).
Major abnormalities and causes of demise
A cause of fetal demise or primary diagnosis was given in the final autopsy report in 122 of 268 cases (45.5%), with 146 of 268 (54.4%) classified as unexplained. In 12 of 146 unexplained cases (8.2%), the autopsy report stated the presence of chorionic plate or fetal membrane hemosiderosis, which was thought to be a contributing factor rather than a cause of demise, as a marker of previous hemorrhage. In 43 of 268 cases (16.0%), the placenta was not submitted for pathologic examination.
Of the cases with a definitive cause of demise or primary diagnosis, 58 of 122 (47.5%) were caused by placental pathologies. These 58 fetus deaths included 39 (67.2%) caused by chorioamnionitis, 6 (10.3%) by maternal vascular malperfusion, 5 (8.6%) by twin-twin transfusion syndrome (1 of which was caused by twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence), 4 (6.9%) by retroplacental hemorrhage, 2 (3.4%) by chronic villitis, 1 (1.7%) by parvovirus B19 infection, and 1 (1.7%) by dysmorphic placental villi favoring aneuploidy.
In 2 of 122 cases (1.6%), there was a combination of both placental and fetal abnormalities, which included 1 case of chorioamnionitis with trisomy 18 and another with chorioamnionitis in a fetus with a large cystic hygroma and complex cardiac anomalies.
The remaining 62 of 122 (50.8%) fetal deaths caused by anomalies included 15 (24.1%) with predominantly musculoskeletal and soft tissue anomalies, 6 (9.7%) with neurologic anomalies, 13 (20.9%) with multisystem anomalies, 17 (27.4%) with suspected or antenatally diagnosed genetic or trisomy abnormalities, 5 (8.1%) with cardiac anomalies, and 6 (9.7%) with abdominal abnormalities.
Agreement between microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound
In 2 of 268 cases (0.7%), no antenatal ultrasound reports were available for review. In 1 case, the micro-CT was normal, and in the other, a cardiac anomaly (tetralogy of Fallot) was identified.
Of the remaining 266 cases for review, there was a complete agreement in imaging findings for 219 cases (81.9%). These included 188 cases (70.7%) that were normal for both antenatal ultrasound and micro-CT imaging and 31 (11.7%) in which the abnormalities on ultrasound and micro-CT were the same. Partial agreement occurred in 21 of 266 cases (7.9%), with the majority caused by multisystem (14 of 21; 66.7%) and cardiovascular anomalies (4 of 21; 19.0%).
Ultrasound and micro-CT findings disagreed in 26 of 266 cases (10.5%), which included 9 of 26 (34.6%) cases in which the micro-CT was normal but the antenatal ultrasound had identified fetal anomalies. These were mostly because of fetal hydrops (4 of 9; 44.4%) which was not evident at postmortem imaging. There was a disagreement regarding cardiac (3 of 26; 11.5%), soft tissue (3 of 26; 11.5%), and genitourinary (3 of 26; 11.5%) abnormalities in equal proportions.
The findings on ultrasound were either normal or caused by secondary signs such as raised nuchal thickness and oligohydramnios. The summary of these agreement rates by systems is presented in Supplemental Table 3, with a more comprehensive list of the individual diagnoses in Supplemental Table 4.
Autopsy avoidance rate
Overall, 221 of 268 parents (82.5%) consented to both micro-CT imaging and invasive autopsy (eg, minimally invasive, fully invasive, or limited autopsy). After reviewing the results of the micro-CT study, pathologists proceeded with invasive investigations in 29 of 221 cases (13.1%), which resulted in an autopsy avoidance rate of 192 of 221 (86.9%).
In 47 of 268 cases (17.5%), consent was provided for micro-CT imaging and external examination of the fetus only; therefore, an autopsy avoidance rate is not applicable, but availability of micro-CT imaging allowed for a noninvasive internal review that would have otherwise not been possible, with a temporal summary of cases provided in Supplemental Figure 3. Further details on the subtype of consented autopsy and subsequent autopsy performed are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Parental consent | Micro-CT | MIA | Limited autopsy | Full autopsy | Invasive procedure avoided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noninvasive autopsy (NIA) (only external, placental, and micro-CT imaging examination) | 47/268 (17.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
MIA (Ultrasound or laparoscopic-guided biopsies of organs+micro-CT only) | 28/268 (10.4) | 7/28 (25.0) | 0 | 0 | 21/28 (75.0) |
Limited autopsy (dissection of a predefined body part only [eg, heart]+micro-CT) | 4/268 (1.5) | 0 | 3/4 (75)a | 0 | 1/4 (25) |
The limited body part consented for included: | |||||
1 for kidneys and bladders, 1 for heart only, 1 for the heart and lungs, 1 for the head and neck | |||||
Full “invasive” autopsy+micro-CT | 189/268 (70.5) | 0 | 2/189 (1.1) (1 × presacral mass; 1 × heart and lungs only) |
17/189 (8.9) | 170/189 (89.9) |
Total | 268 (100) | 7/268 (2.6) | 5/268 (1.9) | 17/268 (6.3) | 192/221 (86.9) |
Data are presented as number fraction (percentage) unless noted otherwise. The column entitled “invasive procedure avoided” was calculated by subtracting the number of cases that underwent any invasive autopsy from the total number with micro-CT imaging in each category. Denominators for calculating percentages in each row are for the total number of those who consented to each category.
MIA, minimally invasive autopsy; micro-CT, microfocus computed tomography; N/A, not available; NIA, noninvasive autopsy.
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Denotes the “limited autopsy” was confined to the heart (1), heart and lungs (1), and genitourinary system (1).
Diagnostic accuracy
Invasive examinations were performed in 29 of 236 fetuses (12.3%), which included a full conventional autopsy in 17 fetuses (58.6%), an MIA in 7 (24.1%) (this subset has also been reported in previous publications20,21), and a limited autopsy in 5 (17.2%).
Neuropathology was performed in 12 of 29 cases (41.3%), although the brain parenchyma was too autolyzed for any definitive diagnostic conclusion in 4 of 12 cases (33.3%).
Detailed sensitivity and specificity table for each body system in this small subset is outlined in Table 2. Histology was not degraded by the iodination and sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate staining, even when some of the iodination had not been fully reversed by the process. Examples of true positives include thoracoabdominoschisis (Supplemental Figure 4), left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Figure 1), and a presacral mass (Figure 2). Examples of false negatives include a perimembranous ventricular septal defect at autopsy which was missed on micro-CT (Figure 3).
Table 2.
Area of the body | NE autopsy | ND autopsy | ND imaging | TP/FP | FN/TN | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Concordance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nervous system | 22 | 4 | 8 | 1/0 | 0/6 | 100 (20.7–100) | 100 (61.0–100) | 100 (20.7–100) | 100 (61.0–100) | 100 (64.6–100) |
Chest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2/0 | 0/25 | 100 (34.2–100) | 100 (86.7–100) | 100 (34.2–100) | 100 (86.7–100) | 100 (87.5–100) |
Cardiovascular system | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2/2 | 1/22 | 66.7 (20.8–93.9) | 91.7 (74.2–97.7) | 50.0 (15.0–85.0) | 95.7 (79.0–99.2) | 88.9 (71.9–96.1) |
Abdomen (non-GU) | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3/0 | 0/20 | 100 (43.9–100) | 100 (83.9–100) | 100 (43.9 –100) | 100 (83.9–100) | 100 (85.7–100) |
Abdomen (GU) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4/0 | 0/23 | 100 (51.0–100) | 100 (85.7–100) | 100 (51.0–100) | 100 (85.7–100) | 100 (87.5–100) |
Total systems | 34 | 5 | 8 | 12/2 | 1/96 | 92.3 (66.7–98.6) | 98.0 (92.9–99.4) | 85.7 (60.1–96.0) | 99.0 (94.4–99.8) | 97.3 (92.4–99.1) |
Overall diagnosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9/2 | 0/18 | 100 (70.1–100) | 90.0 (69.9–97.2) | 81.8 (52.3–94.9) | 100 (82.4–100) | 93.1 (78.0–98.1) |
Nondiagnostic autopsy cases were excluded from calculations. For the 8 cases in which neuropathology examination of the brain could be performed, 7 were of diagnostic quality for comment on micro-CT imaging (in 1 case, brain imaging was too autolyzed for comment). There was 1 true positive (isolated occipital encephalocele) and 6 true negatives. A high conus medullaris position in 3 cases of caudal regression was not evaluated by pathology. The lungs were examined in 27 of 29 fetuses, of which there were 2 true positives—a thoracoabdominoschisis and a left congenital diaphragmatic hernia. There were no false positives or negatives.
The heart was examined in 27 of 29 fetuses, of which there were 2 false positives (both with suspected ventricular septal defect [VSD] on micro-CT) and 1 false negative, which was normal on imaging but found to have a perimembranous VSD at autopsy. Notably, 2 true positives were identified including 1 hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) with an atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) and another with a hypoplastic aorta with atrial septal defect (ASD).
The genitourinary system was examined in 24 of 29 fetuses. In 1 case, micro-CT revealed a hypoplastic left kidney that was too autolyzed for pathologic examination. There were 3 true positives including 1 case of renal agenesis, 1 horseshoe kidney, and 1 case of multicystic kidneys. There were no false positives or false negatives. The remainder of the abdominal contents (excluding the genitourinary system) was examined at autopsy in 25 of 29 fetuses. There were 4 true positives (1 anorectal malformation, 1 omphalocele, 1 diaphragmatic hernia with thoracoabdominal schisis, 1 presacral mass) and no false negatives or positives.
The numbers in parenthesis under the columns for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and concordance denote 95% confidence interval values.
FN, false negative; FP, false positive; GU, genitourinary; ND, nondiagnostic; NE, not examined; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Comment
Principal findings
In this mixed, unselected fetal population, postmortem micro-CT imaging identified fetal structural anomalies in 25% of referred cases, and an invasive autopsy was deemed unnecessary in almost 90%. Micro-CT confirmed the antenatal ultrasound findings in >80% of cases and revealed additional anomalies in some cases.
In a small subset of cases with invasive autopsy as the reference standard, micro-CT revealed a high diagnostic accuracy rate overall, although this was slightly lower in sensitivity rates of cardiac diagnoses compared with a previously published work18 (66.5% vs 90.5%). This could be because of the fact that autopsy in this study was performed where the pathologist believed there could be an additional value to doing so (as opposed to the previous work where these were done in all cases) and differences in statistical calculations. In this study, we considered any cardiac abnormality that was not seen on micro-CT as inaccurate for cardiac diagnosis overall (per fetus), whereas the previous study assessed 9 cardiac indices per fetus and calculated diagnostic accuracy based on the number of inaccurate indices, rather than describing any abnormal cardiac finding as an overall inaccurate cardiac assessment. Although this method may provide more granular information on cardiac abnormalities, our method provides a more simplistic method for explaining the potential shortfalls of micro-CT in cardiac assessment to the parents.
Clinical implications
This work represents advancement in postmortem imaging services, offering parents who have experienced an early pregnancy loss a diagnostic alternative to conventional autopsy. In the past, these cases would have been offered a binary decision of either an external examination or a full autopsy without other options, despite a recent large study finding that almost 90% of 1000 bereaved parents would prefer some form of less invasive investigation, if available.6 Although alternatives to micro-CT exist, such as ultrahigh-field MRI (eg, 7T and 9.4T MRI22, 23, 24), micro-CT is a more practical solution for a clinical service given the high cost of MRI machinery and longer scanning times. Because of the similarity in equipment and running costs between a micro-CT scanner and a medical CT scanner,25 micro-CT imaging offers a more affordable option for centers wishing to provide comprehensive postmortem imaging services and can be operated by healthcare professionals from different medical backgrounds after a short period (approximately 1–2 months) of dedicated supervised training. Although the staining of the fetus with iodinated solution is 1 drawback of micro-CT imaging, we did not receive any negative parental feedback.16,26 We have demonstrated a change in our clinical practice over 3 years as a result of regular imaging and increased confidence in the imaging results. Although the smallest fetus in this study cohort was at 11 weeks’ gestation, we have previously reported imaging feasibility to be as low as 7 weeks’ gestation,27 thereby widening the possible inclusion case criteria.
Although not the focus of this particular study, in some cases, micro-CT results have made a significant impact in future pregnancy counseling for parents.28 One example was a fetus who was at 16 weeks’ gestation, in whom ultrasound findings had included increased nuchal thickening and suspected cardiac anomaly (tricuspid atresia). The micro-CT revealed a hypoplastic aortic arch, atrioventricular septal defect, renal cortical cysts, and 4-limb polydactyly (undetected in utero), which was confirmed as Bardet-Biedl syndrome on genomic sequencing,28 allowing consideration of preimplantation and early gestation genetic testing in future pregnancies.
Research perspectives
To increase the availability and applicability of micro-CT imaging for multicenter, clinical services, several issues and research avenues still remain to be addressed—these include follow-up studies to measure the actual change to clinical management in future pregnancies (assessing also whether useful additional information over the usual antenatal imaging was provided); alternative (or faster) methods for tissue staining to reduce clinical turnaround times; work surrounding parental views and expectations of the technique (such as adequacy of consenting procedures, information regarding likelihood of nondiagnostic or false results, and best methods of relaying imaging results, potentially using three-dimensional [3D] printing methods to reveal anomalies25); and technological advances for efficient, less costly data storage requirements (micro-CT files generate between 10 and 30 gigabyte [GB] data per case,13 compared with standard CT or MRI generating <1 GB per case). All of these could feed into a larger economic health costing analysis to determine the widespread feasibility of providing this service.
Strengths and limitations
The main limitation of this study includes the observational nature of the work. This is mainly caused by a lack of additional autopsy examinations conducted (including lack of placental evaluation in some cases), thereby reducing the cohort in whom we could accurately calculate micro-CT diagnostic accuracy rates and exclude other nonstructural causes of death. It was not considered ethical to withhold the offer of a micro-CT examination to parents who refused standard autopsy (but who did request postmortem imaging) or to perform the autopsy if the pathologist did not believe there would be an added benefit. Nevertheless, this shows the potential value of micro-CT examination to offer a service for parents who refuse standard autopsy and would traditionally otherwise receive no fetal investigation. In addition, because this was a clinical service, reporting pathologists were aware of the micro-CT imaging findings before any subsequent invasive autopsy, hence directing the investigation. Although the small number of cases and nonblinded fashion of reporting limit an objective measure of diagnostic accuracy, they do provide a realistic reflection of this approach in real-world clinical practice. High-resolution 3D imaging has changed clinical fetal postmortem examination practice, increasing confidence in pathologists to not proceed to formal autopsy in these challenging cases.
Furthermore, some areas of apparent disagreement between micro-CT and antenatal ultrasound findings were unable to be resolved in our study, because formal autopsy was not performed. Although the high resolution and magnification of our imaging technique are superior to first- and second-trimester fetal ultrasound imaging2,29,30 and may be superior to standard autopsy as reported in a previous blinded study,18 we were unable to formally confirm the presence or absence of some of the abnormalities reported.
Finally, micro-CT imaging appropriateness and usefulness may not be generalizable to different populations. It is possible that mothers who have experienced recurrent miscarriages without medical explanation or TOPs or who had abnormal antenatal imaging results may have been more likely to consent to our study. In addition, those from religious or ethnic minority groups may have been more willing to consent to noninvasive imaging in preference to autopsy irrespective of referral criteria.31 Other centers’ population demographics may make micro-CT imaging at these gestations even more desirable.
Conclusion
Our data indicate that postmortem micro-CT imaging for human fetuses as part of a noninvasive autopsy examination is a feasible and growing service, with high diagnostic accuracy rates in a small subset in which autopsy was performed. It can provide additional information over the antenatal imaging results and has resulted in a reduction in subsequent invasive autopsies being performed locally for early gestation fetuses. Further research is required regarding large-scale accuracy studies across different demographic groups and to evaluate potential economic healthcare benefits at a national level.
Footnotes
The authors report no conflict of interest.
S.C.S. is supported by a RCUK/UKRI Innovation Fellowship and Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Training Fellowship (grant no. MR/R002118/1). This award is jointly funded by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). I.C.S. is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (ICA-CDRF-2017-03-53). O.J.A. is funded by an NIHR Career Development Fellowship (NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037).
This article presents independent research funded by the MRC, RCR, and NIHR, and the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NHS, MRC, RCR, NIHR, or the Department of Health, United Kingdom.
The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author and the chief investigator (S.C.S. and O.J.A., respectively) had full access to all the data in the study and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Ethical board approval was granted by the local research ethics committee (London–Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee, reference CE13/LO/1494, awarded December 4, 2013; IRAS ID: 131395). All samples were handled in accordance with the Human Tissue Act 2004. Written parental consent was acquired for all postmortem imaging and subsequent autopsy, where performed.
Cite this article as: Shelmerdine SC, Simcock IC, Hutchinson JC, et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies: experience in >250 human fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:103.e1-15.
Supplementary Data
Supplemental Table 1.
Average | Median | Mode | Range | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gestational age (wk) | 16 | 16 | 16.0 | 11–24 |
Postmortem weight (g) | 66 | 42 | 25.0 | 3–350 |
Head circumference (cm) | 10 | 9 | 11.0 | 4–17 |
Crown-heel length (cm) | 14 | 14 | 20.5 | 6–26 |
Crown rump length (cm) | 10 | 10 | 9.0 | 4–19 |
Time between delivery and immersion in iodine (d) | 8 | 8 | 6.0 | 2–22 |
Time spent in iodine solution (d) | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | 1–17 |
Total time from delivery to imaging (d) | 14 | 13 | 12.0 | 0–48 |
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Supplemental Table 2.
Total number | Percentage (n=268) | |
---|---|---|
Sex | ||
Male | 129 | 48.1 |
Female | 122 | 45.5 |
Indeterminate | 17 | 6.3 |
Mode of death or demise | ||
Termination of pregnancy | 71 | 26.5 |
Miscarriage | 163 | 60.8 |
Intrauterine fetal death | 34 | 12.7 |
Maceration score | ||
0—none | 82 | 30.6 |
1—mild | 34 | 12.7 |
2—moderate | 14 | 5.2 |
3—marked or extensive | 138 | 51.5 |
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Supplemental Table 3.
Micro-CT findings | Antenatal ultrasound results |
||
---|---|---|---|
Agree | Partially agree | Disagree | |
Single-system findings | |||
Brain anomalies | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Spine anomalies | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Cardiovascular anomalies | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Abdominal anomalies | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Genitourinary anomalies | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Soft tissue anomalies | 8 | 2 | 3 |
Musculoskeletal anomalies | 5 | 0 | 2 |
Multisystem anomalies | 9 | 14 | 2 |
Normal micro-CT examination | 188/266 (70.7%) | 0 | 9/266 (3.8%) |
Total | 219/266 (81.9%) | 21/266 (7.5%) | 26/266 (10.5%) |
The full individual list of disorders within each category is presented in Supplemental Table 4. In addition to the abovementioned findings, 2 women did not attend for any antenatal examinations; therefore, n=266.
micro-CT, microfocus computed tomography.
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
Supplemental Table 4.
Micro-CT results | Antenatal ultrasound results |
||
---|---|---|---|
Agree | Partially agree | Disagree | |
Brain anomalies | |||
Absent corpus callosum, interhemispheric cyst | 1 | 1, normal | |
Occipital encephalocele | 1, occipital encephalocele+echogenic kidneys | ||
Spine anomalies | |||
Neural tube defect | 1, partial mole | ||
Spinal cord terminating at T6 | 1, ventriculomegaly | ||
Cardiovascular anomalies | |||
VSD | 1 | 1, oligohydramnios | |
AVSD | 2 | 1, univentricular heart | |
HLHS, VSD | 1 | ||
Tetralogy of Fallot | 1, raised NT | ||
Bilateral SVCs | 1, normal | ||
DORV, ASD | 1, HLHS, AVSD | ||
HLHS, aortic hypoplasia | 1, HLHS | ||
Interrupted aortic arch, VSD | 1, DORV, TGA, VSD | ||
Abdominal anomalies | |||
Omphalocele | 2 | 1, normal | |
Sacrococcygeal teratoma | 1 | ||
Genitourinary anomalies | |||
Bilateral cystic kidneys | 1 | ||
Ambiguous genitalia | 1, normal | ||
Right adrenal cyst | 1, normal | ||
Horseshoe kidney | 1, VM, kidneys not visualized | ||
Soft tissue anomalies | |||
Amniotic band syndrome | 1 | 1, normal | |
Hydropic | 2 | 1, raised NT 1, hydropic+echogenic kidneys |
1, normal |
Arthrogryposis | 4 | ||
Amniotic band syndrome | 1 | ||
Decompressed cystic hygroma | 1, normal | ||
Musculoskeletal anomalies | |||
Four-limb phocomelia, exomphalos, cleft palate | 1 | ||
Thanatophoric dysplasia | 1 | ||
Ectrodactyly of limbs | 1 | ||
Osteogenesis imperfecta | 1 | ||
Fibular dimelia | 1 | ||
Achondrogenesis | 1, hydrops and suspected cardiac anomaly | ||
Chondrodysplasia punctata | 1, normal | ||
Multisystem anomalies | |||
Anencephaly, ectopia cordis | 1 | ||
Craniorachischisis, double inlet left ventricle, omphalocele | 1 | ||
Large AVSD, hepatomegaly, intracranial ventriculomegaly in the setting of trisomy 21 | 1 | ||
Gastroschisis and tetralogy of Fallot | 1 | ||
Asymmetric FGR | 1 | ||
Caudal regression—single lower limb, renal anomalies | 1 | ||
Body stalk anomaly | 1 | ||
Right PFFD, megaphallus, anal atresia, small kidney, cloaca | 1 | ||
Encephalocele, cystic kidneys, polydactyly (Meckel-Gruber syndrome) | 1 | ||
NTD+renal anomalies | 1, raised NT 1, IUD at initial US already |
||
Microcephalic, macerated fetus with right-arm anomaly limbs. | 1, omphalocele, cystic hygroma, microcephaly, right arm anomaly | ||
Micromelic skeletal dysplasia+cystic kidneys | 1, thanatophoric dysplasia | ||
VACTERL—short tibia and fibula, polydactyly of feed, hemivertebrae, renal agenesis, VSD, no aortic arch | 1, hemivertebrae and cardiac anomalies detected only | ||
VACTERL spectrum—vertebral anomalies, spinal dysraphism, left SVC, bilateral renal aplasia, absent bladder, anorectal malformation | 1, anhydramnios; could not visualize bladder and kidneys | ||
Short ribs, hemivertebrae, cystic hygroma, renal cysts, AVSD, small pulmonary arteries | 1, cystic hygroma, dilated renal pelvis, and RVOT | ||
NTD with frontal polymicrogyria | 1, NTD | ||
VM, cystic hygroma, tetralogy of Fallot, crossed fused ectopia of kidneys | 1, cystic hygroma, renal fusion, hemivertebrae, posterior fossa anomalies | ||
Body stalk anomaly and NTD | 1, body stalk anomaly | ||
Micrognathia, cleft palate, dextrocardia, intestinal malrotation | 1, micrognathia, cleft palate, suspected cardiac anomaly | ||
Caudal regression—gastroschisis, absent sacrum | 1, gastroschisis; spine and limbs not visualized | ||
Bardet-Biedl syndrome—cystic kidneys, hypoplastic arch, AVSD, polydactyly | 1, increased NT, tricuspid atresia | ||
Abdominal wall defect, horseshoe kidney, normal heart | 1, exomphalos; suspected complex cardiac anomalies | ||
Caudal regression—diaphragmatic hernia, single kidney, limb anomaly | 1, diaphragmatic hernia, limb anomaly, and possible cardiac defect | ||
Caudal regression—renal agenesis, anorectal malformation, absent sacrum and left lower limb | 1, dysplastic kidneys and left leg anomaly | ||
Normal micro-CT examination | |||
188 | 4, hydrops | ||
1, cleft palate, hydrops, major heart defect | |||
1, VM, small cerebellum | |||
1, cystic hygroma | |||
1, cystic structure adjacent to urinary bladder | |||
1, micrognathia |
ASD, atrial septal defect; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; FGR, fetal growth restriction; HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome; IUD, intrauterine device; micro-CT, microfocus computed tomography; NT, nuchal thickness; NTD, neural tube defect; PFFD, proximal focal femoral deficiency; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction; SVC, superior vena cava; TGA, transposition of the great arteries; US, ultrasound; VACTERL, vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, and limb anomalies; VM, ventriculomegaly; VSD, ventricular septal defect.
Shelmerdine et al. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.
References
- 1.Shah H., Al-Memar M., de Bakker B., Fourie H., Lees C., Bourne T. The first-trimester fetal central nervous system: a novel ultrasonographic perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:220–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Edwards L., Hui L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Syngelaki A., Hammami A., Bower S., Zidere V., Akolekar R., Nicolaides K.H. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54:468–476. doi: 10.1002/uog.20844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Palka C., Guanciali-Franchi P., Morizio E. Non-invasive prenatal screening: a 20-year experience in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;3:100050. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miltoft C.B., Rode L., Bundgaard J.R., Johansen P., Tabor A. Cell-free fetal DNA in the early and late first trimester. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47:228–236. doi: 10.1159/000502179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewis C., Riddington M., Hill M. Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed-methods study with bereaved parents. BJOG. 2019;126:745–753. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lewis C., Hutchinson J.C., Riddington M. Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23:1–104. doi: 10.3310/hta23460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lewis C., Hill M., Arthurs O.J., Hutchinson C., Chitty L.S., Sebire N.J. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG. 2018;125:172–181. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shelmerdine S.C., Arthurs O.J., Gilpin I. Is traditional perinatal autopsy needed after detailed fetal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI? Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:818–829. doi: 10.1002/pd.5448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Norman W., Jawad N., Jones R., Taylor A.M., Arthurs O.J. Perinatal and paediatric post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR): sequences and technique. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20151028. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jawad N., Sebire N.J., Wade A., Taylor A.M., Chitty L.S., Arthurs O.J. Body weight lower limits of fetal postmortem MRI at 1.5 T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:92–97. doi: 10.1002/uog.14948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kang X., Cannie M.M., Arthurs O.J. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3542–3553. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4725-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hutchinson J.C., Shelmerdine S.C., Simcock I.C., Sebire N.J., Arthurs O.J. Early clinical applications for imaging at microscopic detail: microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20170113. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lombardi S., Scola E., Ippolito D. Micro-computed tomography: a new diagnostic tool in postmortem assessment of brain anatomy in small fetuses. Neuroradiology. 2019;61:737–746. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02168-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hutchinson J.C., Arthurs O.J., Ashworth M.T. Clinical utility of postmortem microcomputed tomography of the fetal heart: diagnostic imaging vs macroscopic dissection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:58–64. doi: 10.1002/uog.15764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lombardi C.M., Zambelli V., Botta G. Postmortem microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) of small fetuses and hearts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:600–609. doi: 10.1002/uog.13330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hutchinson J.C., Barrett H., Ramsey A.T. Virtual pathological examination of the human fetal kidney using micro-CT. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:663–665. doi: 10.1002/uog.15859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hutchinson J.C., Kang X., Shelmerdine S.C. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for early gestation fetuses: a validation study against conventional autopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:445.e1–445.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Osborn M., Lowe J., Cox P., Hargitai B., Marton T. Guidelines on autopsy practice: fetal autopsy (2nd trimester fetal loss and termination of pregnancy for congenital anomaly) 2017. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/b20ea503-7799-433c-99160653762f896c/Fetal-autopsy-2nd-trimester-fetal-loss-and-termination-of-pregnancy-for-congenital-anomaly.pdf Available at:
- 20.Shelmerdine S.C., Hutchinson J.C., Ward L. Feasibility of INTACT (INcisionless TArgeted Core Tissue) biopsy procedure for perinatal autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55:667–675. doi: 10.1002/uog.20387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hutchinson J.C., Shelmerdine S.C., Lewis C. Minimally invasive perinatal and pediatric autopsy with laparoscopically assisted tissue sampling: feasibility and experience of the MinImAL procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54:661–669. doi: 10.1002/uog.20211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thayyil S., Cleary J.O., Sebire N.J. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet. 2009;374:467–475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60913-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dawood Y., Strijkers G.J., Limpens J., Oostra R.J., de Bakker B.S. Novel imaging techniques to study postmortem human fetal anatomy: a systematic review on microfocus-CT and ultra-high-field MRI. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2280–2292. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06543-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Votino C., Jani J., Verhoye M. Postmortem examination of human fetal hearts at or below 20 weeks’ gestation: a comparison of high-field MRI at 9.4 T with lower-field MRI magnets and stereomicroscopic autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:437–444. doi: 10.1002/uog.11191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shelmerdine S.C., Simcock I.C., Hutchinson J.C. 3D printing from microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) in human specimens: education and future implications. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20180306. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vickerton P., Jarvis J., Jeffery N. Concentration-dependent specimen shrinkage in iodine-enhanced microCT. J Anat. 2013;223:185–193. doi: 10.1111/joa.12068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shelmerdine S.C., Hutchinson J.C., Kang X. Novel usage of microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) for visualisation of human embryonic development: implications for future non-invasive post-mortem investigation. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38:538–542. doi: 10.1002/pd.5281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shelmerdine S.C., Singh M., Simcock I.C. Characterization of Bardet-Biedl syndrome by postmortem microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:132–134. doi: 10.1002/uog.19190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Akgun H., Basbug M., Ozgun M.T. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and fetal autopsy findings in fetal anomalies terminated in the second trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:457–462. doi: 10.1002/pd.1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rossi A.C., Prefumo F. Correlation between fetal autopsy and prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lewis C., Latif Z., Hill M. “We might get a lot more families who will agree”: Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy. PLoS One. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]